John 8:31 Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed;

It's unfortunate that those who claim that kikes ever "believed on" Jesus quote just this one sentence and ignore the context of the rest of this chapter.  If they were to just read ten more seconds, they'd know that this is precisely the chapter where Jesus identifies kikes as NOT being of His GOD, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob:

Joh 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.

Joh 8:48 Then answered the Jews, and said unto him, Say we not well that thou art a Samaritan, and hast a devil?

Had they read at least this far, they would already know that these were non-Israelites who instantly rejected Jesus as soon as they understood what He expected them to "believe". 

John 10:33 The Jews answered him and in John 10:42 "And many believed on him there". [Same context]

Yes, same context, and same misrepresentation of Scripture.  Or even worse, if the entire sentence were to be presented, even the feeble minded could have an appreciation for just how alien kikes are to Israelites like Jesus--AND US:

Joh 10:33 The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God.

As Jesus said previsously, "this did not Abraham".  These kikes are just who Jesus said they are--children of the devil, who Jesus gave ONE more chance:  if they don't believe Him, at least believe "the works".  But they rejected even THAT:

Joh 10:38 But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him.

It's particularly egregious to quote John 10:42 "and man believed oh him there" as if though this is a reference to the kikes in John 10:33.  It is NOT:

Joh 10:40 And went away again beyond Jordan into the place where John at first baptized; and there he abode.

Joh 10:41 And many resorted unto him, and said, John did no miracle: but all things that John spake of this man were true.

Joh 10:42 And many believed on him there.

It was ONLY Israelites, of the House of ISRAEL, who "believed on him there".  There were no kikes there.

John 12:11 Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away and believed on Jesus.

Reading only two sentences prior to this verse, we see a number of interesting things about these kikes:

  1. They didn't come for Jesus' sake.
  2. They heard Lazarus was there.
  3. They wanted to put Lazarus to death.
  4. The REASON they wanted to put Lazarus to DEATH was to prevent them from believing on Jesus.

Joh 12:9 Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus' sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom he had raised from the dead.

Joh 12:10 But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death;

Joh 12:11 Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.

Considering how successful these kikes were at torturing, imprisoning, and murdering Israelites, it would have been a piece of cake for them to keep fellow kikes from believing Jesus.

John 12:42 Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him. At Pentecost the apostles were addressing "Jews".

Another half-verse.  Another half-truth.   The REST of this verse shows that the Israelites who believed on Jesus were so afraid of the kikes called Pharisees that they couldn't even admit it.  Sounds familiar, yes?:

Joh 12:42 Nevertheless among the chief rulers also many believed on him; but because of the Pharisees they did not confess him, lest they should be put out of the synagogue:

"And all that believed were together" -[Acts 2:44]..

So all the Saduccees and Pharisees were there too?

Acts 4:4 Howbeit many of them which heard the word believed; and the number of the men was about five thousand. [The people being addressed were "Jews"!].

Again, the next 4 sentences tell us that the people being addressed were Israelites, not kikes, and that the kike leaders were flaming mad about it:

Act 4:5 And it came to pass on the morrow, that their rulers, and elders, and scribes,

Act 4:6 And Annas the high priest, and Caiaphas, and John, and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of the high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem.

Act 4:7 And when they had set them [read: Israelites] in the midst, they asked, By what power, or by what name, have ye done this?

Act 4:8 Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel,

Acts 10:45 And they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because that on the Gentiles also was poured.

There were circumcised and uncircumcised Israelites.   The word "gentiles" can be a reference to Israelites of the House of Israel in one verse, then to everyone BUT them in the next verse.  Neither of these terms imply a person is or is not a kike.  To presume that those who believed in Acts 10:45 were kikes is contrary to common sense.