The modern day Galileos are beginning to have their
day with the public. Thank God for the internet.

                                              Scott




--- "Thomas R. Ascher" <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose>
wrote:

> From: "Thomas R. Ascher"
> <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose>
> To: "AB" <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose >
> Subject: Fw: The Nonexistent �Auschwitz Gas
> Chambers� of Debor
> ah Lipstadt and Robert Jan van Pelt,  Part II
> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:16:21 -0700
>
>
> UH OH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose>
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:54:28 EST
> To: <undisclosed-recipients:;>
> Subject: The Nonexistent �Auschwitz Gas Chambers� of
> Deborah Lipstadt and
> Robert Jan van Pelt, Part II
>
> Dear Michael,
>
>
> The importance of the article is this.  Even if we
> give the
> Exterminationists
> the benefit of the doubt and assume what they say
> about the operation of the
> "gas chambers" is 100% correct, they still present
> us with an impossible
> scenario.  This article is one more nail in the
> coffin of the Holocaust
> ideology.
>
>
> Paul Grubach
> http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose
>
>
> START:
>
> March 2006
>
> The Nonexistent �Auschwitz Gas Chambers� of Deborah
> Lipstadt and Robert Jan
> van Pelt, Part II
>
> By Paul Grubach  
>
> Preliminary note: This essay is dedicated to
> Holocaust revisionist scholar
> Dr. Robert Faurisson.  He was the first to point out
> the chemical and
> toxicological impossibility of these Auschwitz gas
> chamber stories.
>
> Section one
>
> In early 2005, Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt
> published her widely
> admired History on Trial: My Day in Court with David
> Irving.1  The book is
> her
> version of events surrounding the high-profile, 2000
> libel trial in which
> British
> historian David Irving sued Lipstadt for labeling
> him a �Holocaust denier.�
> During the duration of the trial, the media
> spotlight fell upon the ongoing
> battle between revisionist and traditional views of
> the Jewish tragedy
> during
> W.W.II.  In her publication, she put forth in
> laymen's terms that everyone
> could understand, straightforward reasons as to why
> one should reject
> Holocaust
> revisionist theories and accept the existence of the
> homicidal Auschwitz gas
> chambers.
>
> In Part I of this two part series, we rebutted a
> portion of Lipstadt�s
> critique of Fred Leuchter, the American gas chamber
> expert who carried out
> the first
> ever forensic study of the alleged Auschwitz gas
> chambers.  We saw that,
> although Leuchter�s pioneering report had its
> shortcomings, its findings
> were essen
> tially corroborated by the more thorough and
> exacting scientific study of
> the
> former Max Planck Institute chemistry doctoral
> candidate, Germar Rudolf.
>
> Both reports found only minuscule traces of hydrogen
> cyanide gas (HCN)
> residue in samples taken from the walls and floors
> of the alleged homicidal
> Auschwitz gas chambers.  Yet, very large amounts of
> HCN residue were found
> in samples
> taken from the non-homicidal disinfestation
> chambers, where HCN was used
> only
> to delouse mattresses, clothing and other
> belongings.  If the structures in
> question were actually used as homicidal gas
> chambers, one would expect to
> find
> a considerable HCN residue buildup, somewhat
> comparable to that found in the
> non-homicidal disinfestation chambers.  In both
> reports the conclusions are
> the
> same.  The alleged homicidal gas chambers never
> existed.
>
> Here in Part II, we will examine the technique and
> operation of the alleged
> Auschwitz gas chambers as put forth by Professor
> Lipstadt and one of her
> main
> expert witnesses, Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt, and then
> ask the questions: �Is
> this
> scientifically possible?SDid the gas chambers ever
> exist?�
>
> Section II
>
> In her attempt to prove that the Auschwitz gas
> chambers existed, Lipstadt
> critiques the report of Holocaust revisionist and
> gas chamber expert
> Leuchter.  
> �Had Irving done some research,� she writes, �he
> might have discovered
> Leuchter�s mistaken assumption that it took 3,200
> parts of HCN per million
> to kill
> humans, when in fact it took far less.  On the basis
> of this wrong
> calculation,
> Leuchter had contended that the residue from such a
> large amount of gas
> [would
> have necessitated that] the Sonderkommandos bodies
> chambers.�2
>
> In order to give the reader the appropriate
> perspective, let us recreate
> Lipstadt�s scenario.  The intended victims (one to
> two thousand) were jammed
> into
> the gas chamber.  The deadly hydrogen cyanide was
> circulated throughout the
> chamber, and the victims were murdered.  The
> ventilation systems removed the
> residual HCN.  Now it was time for the inmates to go
> into the chamber and
> remove
> the bodies for cremation.  She asserts that it was
> wrong for Leuchter to
> claim
> that the Sonderkommandos would have had to wait
> twenty-four hours before
> entering the chamber.  This claim and others were
> wrong, Lipstadt insists,
> �because it actually took only 10 percent of what
> Leuchter had assumed was
> necessary
> to kill humans.�    She claims this is Leuchter�s
> fundamental mistake<�the
> assumption that it took far more gas to kill humans
> than to kill vermin,
> when,
> in fact, the reverse was true."3
>
> Simply put, much more gas was used in a
> non-homicidal disinfestation than in
> a homicidal gassing.4
>
> The assertions of the late Jean-Claude Pressac--a
> widely respected expert on
> the Auschwitz gas chambers whose work attempted to
> refute the Holocaust
> revisionists--undermines Lipstadt.  Pressac claimed
> that 12 to 20 grams per
> cubic
> meter is the concentration of the HCN allegedly used
> in a homicidal gassing,
> while 2 to 5 grams per cubic meter was the
> concentration used in a
> non-homicidal
> disinfestation/delousing.5  Contradicting Lipstadt,
> Pressac is claiming that
> a
> greater gas concentration would have been used to
> kill humans than that ne
> eded to kill vermin in a delousing.  Once again,
> Pressac�s claim contradicts
> Lipstadt, which suggests that she and her fellow
> promoters of the Holocaust
> ideology change their story according to the
> propaganda needs of the moment.
>
> Enter Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt, a professor of
> architecture at the University
> of Waterloo, Canada.  He is widely considered to be
> the foremost expert on
> the
> technique and operation of the alleged Auschwitz gas
> chambers.  In
> connection
> with the defense of Professor Lipstadt at the
> Irving-Lipstadt libel trial in
> London from January to April 2000, van Pelt
> testified as an expert witness
> on
> these alleged instruments of mass murder.  It is
> readily apparent that
> Lipstadt relies heavily on the work of van Pelt in
> her attempt to prove the
> existence
> of the Auschwitz gas chambers.  So, any critique of
> Lipstadt�s theories must
> also be a critique of van Pelt.
>
> In his magnum opus, van Pelt makes three important
> claims in regard to the
> technique and operation of the homicidal gas
> chambers.  First, most of the
> deadly hydrogen cyanide gas released into the
> chamber was absorbed by the
> victims�
> bodies.  
>
> Contradicting Holocaust revisionist claims, he
> insists that the ventilation
> systems of the gas chambers were efficient enough to
> remove virtually all of
> the remaining HCN after a mass gassing so that the
> Sonderkommandos could
> enter
> the chambers within a very short time after the
> death of all of the victims
> in
> order to do their work.  In van Pelt�s own words:
> �The situation in the gas
> chambers was different.  With its powerful
> ventilation system and with the
> fact
> that most of the hydrogen cyanide was absorbed by
> the victims� bodies, the
> time [needed to ventilate the gas chambers so the
> Sonderkommandos could
> safely
> enter them to remove the bodies] could be reduced to
> twenty minutes.�6
>
> Finally, he claims that David Olere, a French-Jewish
> deportee to Auschwitz
> in
> 1943, is one of the most important eyewitnesses to
> the operation of the gas
> chambers.  In his own words, the sketches of Olere
> �provide a very important
> visual record of the design and operation of the gas
> chamber and
> incinerators of
> Crematorium 3S�7  Indeed, throughout his entire
> study he attempts to
> demonstrate that Olere is a credible eyewitness by
> showing how his sketches
> are
> consistent with physical evidence.
>
> Jean-Claude Pressac also claimed that the drawings
> of Olere that will be
> examined in this article are an important visual
> record of the operation of
> the
> homicidal gas chambers.8  And last but not least,
> Deborah Lipstadt attempts
> to
> convince her readership that Olere is a credible
> eyewitness by showing how
> his
> claims are consistent with the physical evidence.
> In this regard, she
> refers
> to the �drawings by Sonderkommando  David Olere,
> who, upon liberation
> sketched
> the gas chambers.  
>
> The sketches, Robert Jan [van Pelt] noted, were
> fully corroborated by the
> architectural plans in the Auschwitz Central
> Construction Office and the
> aerial
> photos.�9
>
> Thus, Lipstadt, Pressac and van Pelt claim that
> Olere is perhaps the most
> important eyewitness to the alleged mass gassings,
> and his sketches,
> paintings
> and drawings provide the world with an accurate
> description of the technique
> and
> operation of the Auschwitz gas chambers.  But is
> this so?  Professor van
> Pelt�s omission and inclusion suggest otherwise.
>
> Let us begin with van Pelt�s omission.  In his book
> van Pelt published some
> of Olere�s more important sketches regarding the
> structure and operation of
> the
> alleged gas chambers, but failed to include one of
> his most important
> drawings.  It is the painting showing the
> Sonderkommmandos opening the gas
> chamber
> door and pulling the bodies out after a mass
> gassing.  In the painting, the
> inmates are shirtless, and they are not wearing any
> gas masks, rubber gloves
> or
> protective suits.  Before proceeding, the reader is
> strongly urged to view
> and
> study the sketch in question.  It is online at the
> address in this footnote.
> Scroll down to �Document 30.�10
>
> Pressac includes this painting in his book because
> it allegedly is an
> important visual record of the operation of the gas
> chambers.  In regard to
> this
> matter, he wrote: �The fragment of furnace shown on
> the left, beyond the two
> arrows, is purely symbolic (there was no furnace in
> the basement) and spoils
> a
> scene which would have been irreproachable without
> this addition Oto make it
> better.��  Pressac is clearly saying that this
> sketch is an accurate picture
> of
> what happened, even though it does contain one
> purely symbolic item.11
>
> This is a strange omission on the part of van Pelt.
> That is to say, he
> writes
> a book about the operation of the gas chambers, yet
> omits to include a
> sketch
> of �how-it-really-happened.�  For here we have an
> alleged sketch of
> �how-it-really-was� after a mass gassing, when the
> Sonderkommandos watch
> and supervision of Nazi guards--opened the door of
> the gas chamber to remove
> the
> victims
>
> Perhaps one reason that van Pelt failed to include
> this most important
> sketch
> is because he may have realized it could not have
> happened the way Olere
> claimed it did.  Herewith.
>
> Authoritative industrial sources confirm the extreme
> danger surrounding the
> use of HCN.  Poisoning can easily occur by
> inhalation or skin absorption.12
>
> Leuchter spoke of the dangers surrounding the
> handling of just one (!)
> victim
> that was poisoned by HCN in a gas chamber: �You go
> in.  The inmate has to be
> completely washed down with chlorine bleach or with
> ammonia.  The poison
> exudes right out through his skin.  And if you gave
> the body to an
> undertaker,
> you�d kill the undertaker.  You�ve got to go in;
> you�ve got to completely
> wash
> the body.�13
>
> Bill Armontrout, expert witness at the second Ernst
> Zundel trial in Toronto
> and warden of the Missouri State Penitentiary, which
> includes an execution
> gas
> chamber, confirms the danger: �One of the things
> that cyanide gas does, it
> goes in the pores of your skin.  You hose the body
> down, see.  You have to
> use
> rubber gloves, and you hose the body down to
> decontaminate it before you do
> anything [else].�14
>
> In his capacity as warden, Armontrout was personally
> responsible for
> carrying
> out executions by the use of cyanide gas, and he was
> accepted as an expert
> witness in a court that was hostile to Holocaust
> revisionism.15
>
> Armontrout revealed to the Toronto court the safety
> precautions necessary to
> prevent those who handled the dead criminal's body
> from being poisoned by
> the
> deadly HCN themselves: �The ventilation fan ran for
> approximately one hour
> before two officers equipped with Scott air-packs
> (self-contained breathing
> apparatus which firemen use to enter smoke-filled
> buildings) opened the
> hatch of
> the gas chamber and removed the lead bucket
> containing the cyanide residue.
> The
> two officers wore rubberized disposable clothing and
> long rubber gloves.
> They
> hosed down the condemned man's body in the chair,
> paying particular
> attention
> to the hair and the clothing because of the cyanide
> residue, then removed
> him
> and placed him on a gurney where further
> decontamination took place.�16
>
> Real life tragic incidents corroborate Leuchter�s
> and Armontrout�s claims.
>
> Twenty-three year-old Scott Dominguez descended into
> a tank that once held
> hydrogen cyanide, and later phosphoric acid, in
> order to clean it. When this
> unfortunate worker began chipping away at the
> chemical film and hosing it
> down
> with water, hydrogen cyanide gas was produced.
>
> Just like the workers in Olere's drawings who
> supposedly removed the corpses
> from the Auschwitz gas chambers or the hair and gold
> from the teeth of
> gassed
> victims, Mr. Dominguez was not working with any
> safety equipment--no gas
> mask
> or protective suit. He was overcome by the HCN and
> had to be carried away by
> emergency firefighters. This hapless man suffers
> from permanent brain damage
> because of his exposure to HCN.17
>
> Another tragic incident involving firemen during a
> rescue operation further
> supports Leuchter�s and Armontrout�s assertions.  In
> June 1995, there was a
> dramatic accident in a cave in the French city of
> Monterolier.  Three
> children
> lit a fire in a cave, and threw an unexploded bomb
> they found from W.W.I
> that
> contained hydrogen cyanide gas into the fire.  The
> bomb exploded and
> released
> the deadly HCN.  It killed the children and also
> four firemen that came to
> the
> rescue.  According to a Professor of Physical
> Chemistry, Louis Soulie, the
> deaths of the children and firemen, and even the
> fireman who was wearing a
> gas
> mask, were due to the fact that hydrogen cyanide
> dissolves in the sweat and
> penetrates the body through the skin, where it
> causes poisoning.18
>
> Let us repeat: One French fireman was wearing a gas
> mask, but he perished
> because the HCN dissolved in his sweat and
> penetrated his body.  Even six
> days
> after their deaths, a cyanide concentration twice as
> high as the lethal dose
> was
> detected in the blood of the corpses.19
>
> Finally, there is the incident of suicide by cyanide
> poisoning that took
> place at Grinnell College, Iowa.  A student
> committed suicide by swallowing
> so
> much potassium cyanide that the fumes from his body
> sickened nine people,
> all of
> whom had to be taken to a hospital.  The potassium
> cyanide reacted with the
> water in his body to produce cyanide gas.  The fumes
> that emitted from his
> body
> were so disturbing, that the residence hall where
> the tragic incident took
> place, and the hospital where the student's body was
> taken, had to be aired
> out.20  Keep in mind these are fumes that exuded
> from just one body.
> Imagine the
> fumes exuding from one to two thousand bodies that
> were allegedly poisoned
> by
> HCN in the Auschwitz gas chambers!
>
> In order to give the reader the appropriate
> perspective, let us recreate van
> Pelt�s alleged scenario.  The intended victims (one
> to two thousand) were
> jammed into the gas chamber.  The deadly hydrogen
> cyanide was circulated
> throughout the chamber, and the victims were
> murdered.  The victims� bodies
> absorbed
> the vast majority of the deadly gas and
> lungs of the victims.  The ventilation systems
> quickly removed the residual
> HCN.
>  Now it was time for the inmates to go into the
> chamber and remove the dead
> bodies for cremation.
>
> Once again, let us give van Pelt the benefit of the
> doubt bodies absorbed the vast majority of the
> deadly HCN gas.  Here we have over
> one
> thousand dead bodies being saturated with deadly HCN
> hair,
> noses, mouths, on their skin, in their lungs.  As
> Bill Armontrout points
> out,
> the HCN exudes from the victims' bodies.
>
> The Sonderkommandos enter the gas chamber to remove
> the bodies.  According
> to
> one of van Pelt�s most important eyewitnesses, David
> Olere, the inmates who
> removed the bodies from the chambers wore no gas
> masks, protective suits or
> rubber gloves to protect them from the inhalation or
> skin absorption of HCN.
> They did not even have shirts on!
>
> The heavy labor of removing the thousand bodies from
> the chambers causes the
> Sonderkommandos to sweat.  People who are sweating
> are even more prone to
> absorb the deadly HCN through the skin.
>
> As the evidence points out, the victims' bodies
> exude the deadly HCN why the body of someone who has
> died from HCN poisoning must be hosed down
> and
> rigorously decontaminated.   In neither Pressac�s
> nor van Pelt�s
> authoritative tomes is there any mention that each
> victim�s body was hosed
> down and
> thoroughly decontaminated after a mass gassing, nor
> is this process included
> in any
> of Olere�s �true-to-life� sketches.
>
> We return to the operation of the gas chambers.  The
> Sonderkommandos enter
> the chambers to remove the bodies.  They perspire
> because of the hard labor.
> This makes them even more prone to absorb the deadly
> HCN gas that exudes
> from
> the mass of dead bodies in the gas chamber.  As
> Professor Soulie points out,
> the
> firemen died from HCN absorbed by their sweat, even
> though one of them was
> wearing a gas mask.  Dr. van Pelt�s most important
> eyewitness, David Olere,
> claims in his sketches that the Sonderkommandos were
> shirtless and they wore
> no
> rubber gloves, nor did they wear any gas masks.
> This makes them extremely
> prone
> to HCN poisoning by way of skin absorption and
> inhalation.
>
> As we saw in the incident of the suicidal student
> from Grinnell College, the
> fumes from just one body were toxic enough to cause
> nine people to go to the
> hospital.  Imagine the toxicological impact of one
> to two thousand dead
> bodies,
> all exuding the deadly HCN, upon the Sonderkommandos
> and Nazi guards who
> were
> wearing no gas masks or protective suits.  It would
> have been overwhelming!
>
> Thus, the important sketch of Lipstadt and van
> Pelt�s most important
> eyewitness, David Olere, contains a chemical and
> toxicological
> impossibility.  
> Although his discussion of this matter is somewhat
> vague, van Pelt seems to
> implicitly realize that the Sonderkommandos would
> have--at the very least!--
> needed gas
> masks to enter the gas chamber after they opened the
> door to remove the
> bodies.21  In this particular sketch, the inmates
> removing the bodies and
> the Nazi
> guards supervising those executions are not wearing
> any gas masks. The
> inmates
> dragging the dead bodies are even shirtless!
>
> Perhaps this is the reason that van Pelt failed to
> publish this most
> important drawing of Olere.  He may have realized
> that the sketch of his
> most
> important eyewitness to the operation of the gas
> chambers contained a
> physical
> impossibility.  In other words, he may not have
> published this most
> important sketch
> because he did not want to give Holocaust
> revisionists ammunition to use
> against the Auschwitz gas chamber story.
>
> But it gets even worse for Lipstadt and van Pelt.
> Let us now turn to a
> sketch of David Olere that van Pelt did include in
> his book shows
> the Sonderkommandos inside of the gas chamber after
> a gassing collecting the
> hair and gold teeth.  Alongside of the
> Sonderkommandos is a Nazi guard, only
> part of his leg and jackboot showing.  Once again,
> the Sonderkommandos are
> not
> wearing any gas masks, rubber gloves, or protective
> suits to protect them
> from
> the deadly HCN that would have exuded from the
> bodies of the over one
> thousand
> victims.  Before proceeding, the reader is strongly
> urged to view and study
> the sketch under discussion.  It is online at the
> address in this
> footnote.22  
>
> We return to the assertions of the expert witness,
> warden Bill Armontrout.
> The body of a gassed criminal is hosed down and
> decontaminated, and
> especially
> close attention is paid to the hair, as it is here
> that much of the deadly
> HCN
> collects.  Yet, in Olere�s sketch, we see the
> Sonderkommandos gloves, gas masks or protective
> suits pile of victims!  
>
> Remember, van Pelt claims that the vast majority of
> the deadly gas was
> absorbed by the victims� bodies victims
> and ultimately kill the Sonderkommandos who
> collected the hair and gold
> teeth!   Nowhere in van Pelt�s tome is it mentioned
> that each and every body
> was
> hosed down and decontaminated before the hair and
> gold in the teeth were
> removed.  Nor does the �how-it-really-happened�
> sketch of Olere show the
> Sonderkommandos decontaminating each
> and every body, which would have been necessary to
> prevent poisoning from
> the
> ocean of deadly HCN that would have exuded from the
> over one thousand dead
> bodies.    
>
> We return to Lipstadt.  She is saying that because
> only 320 parts per
> million
> (10% of what Leuchter claimed) was necessary to kill
> humans, the ventilation
> systems could have removed the residual gas quickly,
> and the inmates could
> have entered the chambers a very short time after
> the homicidal gassings to
> remove the victims for cremation.  All would have
> run relatively smoothly.
>
> Dr. van Pelt claims that 300 parts per million of
> HCN is lethal to humans,
> and allegedly, this is the concentration the Nazis
> used in the gas
> chambers.23  
> The 300 parts per million necessary to kill humans
> is a little less than the
> Lipstadt�s threshold of 320 parts per million.  This
> suggests that even
> small
> amounts of gas that would have exuded from the skin,
> nose, mouth, and hair
> of
> one (!) dead body could have killed any
> Sonderkommando, or any of the Nazi
> guards that allegedly supervised those executions.
>
> Even worse for the Lipstadt/van Pelt scenario, the
> amount of HCN exuding
> from
> each of the over one thousand bodies would have, in
> the end, accumulated to
> an ocean of gas to poison both the Sonderkommandos
> and the Nazi guards by
> skin
> absorption or inhalation.
>
> At the risk of sounding redundant, let us again
> recreate the gassing
> scenario
> of Lipstadt and van Pelt in order for the reader to
> clearly understand the
> chemical and toxicological impossibility of the
> operation of the Auschwitz
> gas
> chambers.  One thousand to two thousand victims are
> herded into the gas
> chamber.  The doors are closed, and the deadly HCN
> is circulated throughout
> the
> chamber.  The gas murders the victims.  As van Pelt
> claims, their bodies
> absorb
> most of the gas.  The residual, remaining amount is
> extracted from the
> chamber by
> the powerful ventilation systems.
>
> The door of the gas chamber is opened.  According to
> the most important
> eyewitness, David Olere, the inmates who entered the
> chamber to remove the
> bodies
> for cremation wore no gas masks, rubber gloves or
> protective suits to
> protect
> them from HCN poisoning by way of inhalation or skin
> absorption.  The
> inmates
> that entered the chamber to collect the hair of the
> victims wore no gas
> masks,
> rubber gloves, or protective suits to protect them
> from poisoning by way of
> inhalation or the skin absorption of the deadly HCN.
>  The Nazi guards that
> supervised these executions wore no gas masks or
> protective suits.
>
> The Sonderkommandos are confronted with one to two
> thousand bodies, all
> saturated with deadly HCN.  They do their work with
> no gas masks, rubber
> gloves or
> protective suits.  According to van Pelt, the vast
> majority of the gas was
> absorbed by the victims� bodies, only to exude from
> those same bodies and
> poison
> anyone who was not wearing a gas mask, protective
> suit and rubber gloves.
>
> One of the important points here is this.  Even if
> we give Lipstadt and van
> Pelt the benefit of the doubt, and assume that all
> of their assertions on
> the
> operation of the �gas chambers� are all correct,
> their gas chamber operation
> scenario is still virtually impossible.
>
> If, without gas masks, rubber gloves and protective
> suits, it is extremely
> dangerous to handle just one (!) body saturated with
> the deadly HCN; if only
> one
> dead body saturated with the deadly HCN can exude
> enough toxic fumes to send
> nine people to the hospital, it would be almost
> impossible to handle one to
> two thousand dead bodies saturated with HCN without
> gas masks, protective
> suits
> and rubber gloves.
>
> The inmates in Olere�s sketches that allegedly
> handled those one to two
> thousand dead bodies without gas masks, rubber
> gloves, and protective suits
> would
> have been poisoned by way of inhalation or skin
> absorption.  The physical
> evidence provided by the three examples of HCN
> poisoning incident, the Grinnell College suicide,
> and the children in the cave
> incident important
> eyewitness puts forth an impossible scenario.
>
> It does no good to counter the revisionists by
> saying: �Well, the drawings
> of
> David Olere are just symbolic of what really
> transpired.  He was engaging in
> Oartistic license� when he depicted the
> Sonderkommandos with no gas masks,
> rubber gloves and protective suits.�  If this is so,
> then his sketches are
> not an
> accurate representation of the operation of the gas
> chambers.  And, Dr. van
> Pelt�s claim that Olere�s sketches provide a very
> important visual record of
> the operation of the gas chamber of Crematorium 3 is
> not true.
>
> Furthermore, it does no good to counter the
> revisionists by saying: �Well,
> the Nazis didn�t care about the lives of the
> Sonderkommandos, so they did
> not
> have to use the safety precautions of gas masks,
> protective suits and rubber
> gloves.�  Quite the contrary.  The Nazi guards that
> allegedly supervised
> those
> executions had to make certain that the
> Sonderkommandos quickly removed all
> of
> the bodies to make room for the next batch of
> victims.  Thus, they would
> have
> had to make certain that the inmates stayed alive at
> least long enough to
> �get
> the job done.�  That is, in order for them to stay
> alive long enough to
> complete the job, they would have had to wear gas
> masks and protective
> suits.  
> Furthermore, in order to protect the lives of the
> Nazi guards that allegedly
> supervised those executions, it would have been
> necessary for them to wear
> gas masks
> and protective suits.
>
> Finally, let us assume that what Jean-Claude Pressac
> claimed is the truth.
> The Sonderkommandos that entered the gas chambers
> after a mass gassing wore
> gas
> masks.24  Even if we assume this to be so, the
> �Auschwitz gas chamber������� story
> is still impossible.  This still leaves open the
> fact that HCN poisoning can
> occur by skin absorption.  Nowhere in sketches of
> Olere or in the
> authoritative tomes of van Pelt or Pressac is it
> ever claimed that the
> Sonderkommandos
> wore rubber gloves or protective suits to protect
> them from the skin
> absorption
> of the ocean of deadly HCN that would have exuded
> from the myriad of bodies
> in
> the gas chambers.  
>
> The reader is asked to recall the story of the four
> firemen who perished
> from
> the skin absorption of HCN, in spite of the fact
> that one of them was
> wearing
> a gas mask.  The reader should simply consider the
> devastating toxic effect
> upon the Sonderkommandos, all wearing gas masks,
> when they put their bare
> hands
> into the HCN saturated hair and mouths of the over
> one thousand victims.
> Poisoning by skin absorption would have occurred,
> because they never
> decontaminated each body and they wore no protective
> suits or rubber gloves.
>
> What I reveal here is nothing new.  As far back as
> the 1970s, Holocaust
> revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson revealed to the
> world the chemical and
> toxicological impossibility of this Auschwitz gas
> chamber legend.
>
> Ironically, it is, I believe, a very favorable sign
> for the future of
> Holocaust revisionism that most of the Western power
> elites refuse to debate
> the
> Holocaust revisionists, but only resort to name
> calling, threats of career
> destruction and jail sentences.  It suggests to the
> world that Holocaust
> revisionism
> cannot be defeated with evidence and reason.  The
> opponents of revisionism
> are
> intellectually impotent, and they cannot defeat
> revisionism with facts,
> evidence and logic.  The �Holocaust� is a weak and
> flimsy ideology that
> needs
> special laws, threats of career destruction and jail
> sentences to protect
> it.
>
>  
> Footnotes
>
>  
>
> Deborah E. Lipstadt, History on Trial: My Day in
> Court with David Irving
> (HarperCollins Publishers, 2005).
>
> Ibid, p.122.
>
> Ibid, pp. 122, 131.
>
> Ibid. p.36.
>
> Jean-Claude Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and
> Operation of the Gas Chambers
> (Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, 1989), pp.16, 18, 31.
> Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0011.htm
>
> Robert Jan van Pelt, The Case for Auschwitz:
> Evidence from the Irving Trial
> (Indiana University Press, 2002), p.275.
>
> Ibid, p.173.
>
> Pressac, p. 493.  Scroll down to Documents 30 and
> 31.  Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Lipstadt, p. 140.
>
> Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Pressac, p.493.  Scroll down to Document 30.
> Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Zyklon for Pest Control: Information brochure of the
> German Society for Pest
> Control on the use of its insecticide Zyklon B.  
> Reprinted in Frederick A.
> Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The
> Leuchter Reports: Critical
> Edition (Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005), pp.
> 75-88.  Online:
> http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tlr/
>
> Stephen Trombley, The Execution Protocol (Crown
> Publishers, 1992), p.98.
>
> Ibid., p.102.
>
> Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die?:
> Report of the Evidence
> in
> the Canadian OFalse News� Trial of Ernst Zundel<1988
> (Samisdat Publishers,
> 1992), p.351.  Online:
>
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html
>
> Ibid., p.352.  Online:
>
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html
>
> Department of Justice National News Release, 10 May
> 1999.  Reprinted in
> Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report: Expert Report on
> Chemical and Technical
> Aspects
> of the OGas Chambers� of Auschwitz (Theses &
> Disserations Press, 2003),
> pp.18-19.  Online:
> http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2.  For a list
> of
> other
> articles on this matter, see the references in
> footnote 20 on p.19 of
> Rudolf.
>
> See the article about this in Rudolf, p.20.  Online:
> http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2
>
> Ibid.
>
> See Rudolf, pp. 17-18.  Minnesota State University,
> Mankato Reporter, Online
> Edition, 10 October 1998, �Suicide fumes sicken nine
> Iowa students.�
> Online:
> http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2
>
> Robert Jan van Pelt, p.275.
>
> Pressac, p.493. Scroll down to Document 31.  Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Robert Jan van Pelt, p.362.
>
> Pressac, p.16.  Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0016.htm
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Peace is patriotic!
> Michael Santomauro
> Editorial Director
> 253 West 72nd street #1711
> New York, NY 10023
> http://www.tadp.org/
> Available for Talk-Radio interviews 24hours
> 212-787-7891
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The QUESTION:
> To subscribe and grow with knowledge or
> to unsubscribe and Die Stupid?
> Send an E-mail to:
> http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>