ISRAELITES ARE NOT
And so it is written, The first man Adam was
made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit. 1 Corinthians
SONS OF ADAM SEPARATED FROM SONS OF
ISRAELITES PUNISHED BY
SOWING THEM WITH SONS OF ADAM
Deu 32:8 When the most High
divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the
bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.
Deu 32:8 When the most High5945 divided5157 to the nations1471 their inheritance, when he separated6504
the sons1121 of Adam,120 he set5324 the bounds1367 of the people5971 according to the number4557 of
the children1121 of Israel.3478
Note that the Hebrew word
"sheniy" [#8145], which means "other", is not in either of the above
verses. Just as "sheniy" appears in the following verse, if Israelites
actually considered themselves to be "sons of Adam or "seed of man ", they
would have written "with the other [sheniy] seed of Adam" :
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house
of Judah with the seed of man, and with the seed of beast.
31:27 Behold,2009 the days3117 come,935 saith5002 the LORD,3068 that I will sow2232 (853) the house1004 of
Israel3478 and the house1004 of Judah3063 with the seed2233 of man,120 and with the seed2233
Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will sow the house of Israel and the house
of Judah with the seed of Adam, and with the seed of Ish.
Gen 4:19 And Lamech took unto him
two wives: the name of the one was Adah, and the name of the other
Gen 4:19 And Lamech3929 took3947 unto him two8147 wives:802 the name8034 of the one259 was Adah,5711 and the name8034 of the other8145
Because "sheniy" is
conspicuously absent from both verses, there can be no doubt that Israelites can't consider themselves to be
GOD ORDERS ISRAELITES
TO DESTROY SONS OF ADAM
20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; [namely], the Hittites, and the Amorites, the Canaanites, and the
Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD thy God hath commanded thee:
Ezra 9:1 Now when these things
were done, the princes came to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the
Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands,
doing according to their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the
Ammonites, the Moabites, the Egyptians, and the Amorites.
25:17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:
For they vex you with their wiles, wherewith they have beguiled you in the matter of Peor,
and in the matter of Cozbi, the daughter of a prince of Midian, their sister, which was
slain in the day of the plague for Peor's sake.
ADAMITES ARE THY FOES
The LORD offered David 3 choices as
punishment for numbering the sons of Israel:
1Ch 21:12 Either three years' famine; or three months
to be destroyed before thy foes, while that the sword of thine enemies overtaketh thee; or else three days the sword
of the LORD, even the pestilence, in the land, and the angel of the LORD destroying
throughout all the coasts of Israel. Now therefore advise thyself what word I shall bring
again to him that sent me.
1Ch 21:13 And David said unto Gad, I am in a great
strait: let me fall now into the hand of the LORD; for very great are his mercies: but let me not fall into the hand of man
By saying "let me fall now into
the hand of the LORD" David accepted "three days of the sword of the LORD".
He rejected "three years of famine" and "three months to be
destroyed before thy foes" by saying "let me not fall into the hand of
Adam". Is it Adam who would would have caused the famine? No. It's
Adam who were "thy foes" who would have had three months to destroy Israel.
The LORD then sent a plague upon Israel and seventy thousand men fell.
VERSUS SPIRITUAL BODY
The 12th chapter of 1 Corinthians
compares opposites to opposites: corruption vs. incorruption, dishonor vs. glory,
weakness vs. power, etc. But you cannot understand how "natural" could be
considered to be the opposite of "spiritual" until you realize from Paul's allegory
in Galatians 4 that "natural body" is Ishmaelites [and allegorically all
non-Israelites] and "spiritual body" is Israelites:
15:44 It is sown a natural body; it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.
The Greek word "psuchikos"
[#5591] from which "natural" man is translated is also defined as
From G5590; sensitive that is, animate
(in distinction on the one hand from G4152, which is the higher or renovated
nature; and on the other from G5446, which is the lower or bestial nature): -
Thus Paul is making a comparison
between the bestial Adam created in Genesis 1:27 and the living soul Adam formed
in Genesis 2:7, which are two very different accounts:
JESUS IS NOT EVERYTHING
- God in the flesh.
- Son of God.
- Son of man.
- Son of Adam.
- Pure Israelite sacrifice to God.
- Last Adam.
Those who believe Jesus is God in
the flesh must believe that He "created" Adam120 in Genesis 1:27 or
"formed" Adam121 in Genesis 2:7, ruling out Jesus as the "last Adam"
as that would require them to believe that God created Himself. Those who believe
Jesus was the Son of God cannot also maintain that Jesus was the "second Adam"
because that would require them to believe that the only son of God was made into
[read: ginomai] a quickening spirit. Had this been a reference to Jesus being
"born" as a quickening spirit, the Greek word "gennao" [#1080] would
have been used as it was in Matthew 1:16:
Mat 1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary,
of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
This is the only verse in the entire
Holy Bible which judeochristians can point to and claim that Jesus was the "last
Adam", a concept missing from every book of the Old Testament and all other books of
the New Testament. Furthermore, as an Israelite, it would be an insult to Him to
refer to Him as an Adamite, son of Adam, or son of man.
The Iranians and Afghans claim to be Aryans. Our own dictionaries say that they're
Aryans. Even Webster has the following definition for Aryans:
"3 : of or relating to Indo-Iranian or its speakers"
Aryans are "white". They're even "whiter" than us. I lived there 13
months and was shocked to see how Iranians have been protrayed in our jewsmedia as muds
[but what else should we expect from the jews?].
They're Adamites. And it's clear as daylight to me that they're not Israelites. Even
though they're "white", they're so radically different from us racially,
intellectually, culturally, and in so many other ways, that I've never believed that we
could possibly have a common ancestor.
Before Iran, I lived in Germany for 9 years and was surprised at how so many Americans
accept the notion that Germans are Aryans. I never met a single German who ever made such
a ludicrous statement. Germans know who the Aryans are. So why don't we?
There ARE some similarities in the language, but that's where the similarities end. The
word "German" is the Assyrian word for "Judah", which makes sense as a
small part of the Tribe of Judah was taken captive by the Assyrians [search the internet
for Behistun Rock in Iran to see just how proud King Darius was to have captured them].
The Assyrians were Adamites too, but they were certainly nothing like the Israelites.
The Egyptians were Adamites. And they were so different racially from the Israelites that
even after 4 centuries of captivity in Egypt, Moses was able to identify each Israelite
man over the age of 20 by pedigree, family, and tribe. The offspring of any Israelites who
married Egyptians were the mixed multitude who didn't survive the 40 year trek across the
desert. And all of the following races were Adamites:
Deuteronomy 20:16 But of the cities of these people, which the LORD thy God doth give
thee [for] an inheritance, thou shalt save alive nothing that breatheth:
Deuteronomy 20:17 But thou shalt utterly destroy them; [namely], the Hittites, and the
Amorites, the Canaanites, and the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites; as the LORD
thy God hath commanded thee:
There's speculation that Canaan was a descendant of one of Noah's wives who was a
descendant of Cain, in which event he would not be a pure Adamite--but he would still be a
descendant of Adam [and it's not clear how someone could be a pure descendant of Adam,
anyway]. If there's a single verse which claims that these other races above were not
Adamites, I'd sure like to see it.
People claim that it was ok for Israelites to marry Midianites, who were also Adamites.
But look at how many verses command the Israelites to totally destroy them:
Num 25:17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:
Num 31:3 And Moses spake unto the people, saying, Arm some of yourselves unto the war, and
let them go against the Midianites, and avenge the LORD of Midian.
Num 31:7 And they warred against the Midianites, as the LORD commanded Moses; and they
slew all the males.
Jdg 6:3 And [so] it was, when Israel had sown, that the Midianites came up, and the
Amalekites, and the children of the east, even they came up against them;
Jdg 6:14 And the LORD looked upon him, and said, Go in this thy might, and thou shalt save
Israel from the hand of the Midianites: have not I sent thee?
Jdg 6:16 And the LORD said unto him, Surely I will be with thee, and thou shalt smite the
Midianites as one man.
Jdg 7:23 And the men of Israel gathered themselves together out of Naphtali, and out of
Asher, and out of all Manasseh, and pursued after the Midianites.
Jdg 7:24 And Gideon sent messengers throughout all mount Ephraim, saying, Come down
against the Midianites, and take before them the waters unto Bethbarah and Jordan. Then
all the men of Ephraim gathered themselves together, and took the waters unto Bethbarah
Psa 83:9 Do unto them as [unto] the Midianites; as [to] Sisera, as [to] Jabin, at the
brook of Kison:
Why did the LORD want the Midianites dead? Because they were Adamites.
Esau was an Adamite. But God hated Esau. Ishmael was an Adamite. But God excluded him and
his descendants from His everlasting covenant. Lot was an Adamite. But God cut him out of
the everlasting covenant. Moabites and Ammonites were Adamites. But God specifically
prohibited them from even being in the territory:
An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their
tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD forever:
If you can find a verse which says it's ok for an Israelite to marry an Adamite, you
need to post it here quickly. I don't believe there is any such thing. And I believe that
your suggestion that "every creature" refers to Adamites--would make a fool of
God who said to destroy them, not preach to them.
The phrase "son of man" is translated from 8 different Hebrew words, which were
all proper nouns. In the original Hebrew, you could distinguish between "ben
Adam" and "ben Ish" because people knew who Adam and Ish were. But when
this appears in English as simply "son of man", we can no longer detect the
distinction. It's certainly not acceptable for an Israelite to marry a "ben
ish". But in reality, I don't know of a single "ben Adam" which God didn't
command us to destroy, so why would we presume that it would be ok to marry them?
Adam Was Not The First Man
And so it is written, The
first man Adam was made a living
soul; the last Adam was
made a quickening spirit, 1Co 15:45
So God created Adam
in his [own] image, in
the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. Genesis 1:27
And the LORD God formed Adam of the dust of the ground, and
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and Adam became
a living soul. Gen 2:7
Gen 34:25 And it came to pass on the third day, when they were sore,
that two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, Dinah's brethren, took each man his sword,
and came upon the city boldly, and slew all the males
Gen 34:25 And it came to pass1961 on the third7992
day,3117 when they were1961 sore,3510 that two8147 of the sons1121 of
Jacob,3290 Simeon8095 and Levi,3878 Dinah's1783 brethren,251 took3947 each man376 his sword,2719 and came935 upon5921 the city5892 boldly,983 and slew2026 all3605 the males.2145
Exo 13:15 And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly let us go, that
the LORD slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the
firstborn of beast: therefore I sacrifice to the LORD all that openeth the matrix, being
males; but all the firstborn of my children I redeem.
Exo 13:15 And it came to pass,1961 when3588 Pharaoh6547 would hardly7185 let us go,7971 that the LORD3068
slew2026 all3605 the firstborn1060 in the land776 of Egypt,4714 both the firstborn4480, 1060 of man,120 and the
firstborn1060 of beast:929 therefore5921, 3651 I589 sacrifice2076 to the
LORD3068 all3605 that openeth6363 the matrix,7358 being males;2145 but all3605 the firstborn1060 of
my children1121 I redeem.6299
Willie Martin email@example.com
Adam Was Not The First Man
(1) Question: Were there people before
Adam and Eve?
Answer: This question is almost always
asked whenever atheists and agnostics are trying to confound or confuse a New Christian!
It comes from a reading of:
"So God created man in his own image,
in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed them,
and God said unto them. Be fruitful, and multiply, and REPLENISH the earth..."
Many people have become agnostics because
of the supposed conflict between the Bible and science. In truth, there is no conflict at
all between a correct translation of the Bible and really proven science, not just
Men have theorized for years about the
possibility of the coexistence of another race of human beings upon the earth during the
time of Adam. It must be recognized that there is considerable evidence to show that the
earth was not only inhabited by a race(s), but as a result of the earth becoming void and
without form, that race or races were apparently destroyed. But first let's look at the
1). to make full or complete AGAIN,
as by furnishing a NEW SUPPLY.
2). to supply AGAIN...or the
3). of PEOPLE. (New World
Dictionary of the American Language, Second Edition page 1205)
Jeremiah the Prophet refers briefly to the
existence of such a race(s), but he states that, as a result of the earth becoming void
and without form, that race(s) were apparently destroyed.
"I beheld the earth, and, lo, it was
without form, and void; and the heavens, and they had no light. I beheld the mountains,
and, lo, they trembled, and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld, and, lo, THERE WAS
NO MAN...I beheld, and, lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness, and ALL THE CITIES
THEREOF WERE BROKEN DOWN AT THE PRESENCE OF THE LORD, AND BY HIS FIERCE ANGER...For
this shall the earth mourn, AND THE HEAVENS ABOVE BE BLACK..." (Jeremiah
Job also makes reference to a past age, a
"For enquire...OF THE FORMER
AGE, and prepare thyself to the SEARCH OF THEIR FATHERS." (Job 8:8)
Job then relates:
"For want and famine they were
solitary; fleeing into the wilderness IN FORMER TIME DESOLATE AND WASTE."
"THERE IS NO REMEMBRANCE OF FORMER
THINGS..." (Exodus 1:11)
"Then the earth shook and trembled;
the foundations also of the hills moved and were shaken, because he was wroth. There went
up a smoke out of his nostrils, and fire out of his mouth devoured: coals were kindled by
it. He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet. And he rode
upon a cherub, and did fly: yea, he did fly upon the wings of the wind. He made darkness
his secret place; his pavilion round about him were DARKWATERS and thick clouds of
the skies. At the brightness that was before him his thick clouds passed, hail stones and
coals of fire. The Lord also thundered in the heavens, and the Highest gave his voice:
hail stones and coals of fire. Yea, he sent out his arrows, and scattered them; and he
shot out lightnings, and discomfited them. Then the channels of waters were seen, and the
foundations of the world were discovered at thy rebuke, O Lord, at the blast of the breath
of thy nostrils." (Psalms 18:715)
"...LET THEM SHEW THE FORMER
THINGS..." (Isaiah 41:22)
"REMEMBER THE FORMER THINGS
OF OLD...AND FROM ANCIENT TIMES..." (Isaiah 46:910)
Then Isaiah relates a most revealing
statement from God:
"For, behold, I CREATE NEW HEAVENS
(NOTE: a plural heavens: more than one) AND A NEW EARTH: AND THE FORMER SHALL
NOT BE REMEMBERED, nor come into mind." (Isaiah 65:17)
Then we have God's Law to confirm the
existence of people other than Adam. Cain's wife, which is another question in itself.
"And Cain went out from the presence
of the Lord... And Cain knew his wife..." (Genesis 4:1617)
Now most "Ministers" will repeat
that old, old, worn out statement, one which cannot stand a close inspection, hence the
instincts of the atheists and agnostics to that fact, giving them more fuel for the
consternation they are causing the New Christian: "Cain's wife was his
Choosing to completely ignore God's Law
concerning this situation.
"The nakedness of thy sister, the
daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born
abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover...The nakedness of thy father's wife's
daughter, begotten of thy father, she is thy sister, thou shalt not uncover her
nakedness." (Leviticus 18:9, 11)
"And if a man shall take his sister,
his father's daughter, or his mother's daughter, and see her nakedness, and she see his
nakedness; it is a wicked thing; and they shall be cut off in the sight of their people:
he hath uncovered his sister's nakedness; he shall bear his iniquity." (Leviticus
I can just hear the atheists and agnostics
cry out: "But Cain has already broken God's Law once, so why wouldn't he do so a
second time." and well he might; and there is ample evidence that he did sin time and
time again, But now a second, third and even a fourth person must consent to his'
breaking of God's Law.
His sister, his father (Adam) and his
mother (Eve) must also consent to this violation of God's Law, not just Cain: Which would
be consistent with the period of time involved, this would do violence to the Scriptures.
Thus this answer is completely unacceptable.
Thus, the only logical answer to the
question is: Not only were there people on earth before, (Genesis 1:2) BUT THERE WERE
OTHERS PRESENT WHEN GOD, FORMED A MAN TO TILL THE GROUND, AND WHO
WAS FIRST CALLED ADAM IN Genesis 2:19.
Therefore, it is clear for all to see,
that the Judeo-Christian clergy say that Adam and Eve were the first man and woman, but
the Bible doesnt, it merely says Adam was the first White Man. Lets look at
Many mistranslation in the King James
Bible obscure much of the truth; for example Genesis 1:1-2:
In the beginning, Yahweh created the
heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form and void and darkness was upon the
face of the deep.
In the Hebrew it says, Now the earth
HAD BECOME chaotic and empty. (See Rotherhams emphasized Bible) Some early
catastrophe had wrecked the earth, which was not without form and void before that. This
was a judgment of Yahweh on earlier civilizations, for their wickedness. Jeremiah 4:23-27
gives a vision and we state it again to be sure you remember it:
I beheld the earth and lo, it was
without form and void; and the heavens and they had no light. I beheld the mountains and
lo, they trembled and all the hills moved lightly. I beheld and lo, there was no man and
all the birds of the heavens were fled. I beheld, and lo, the fruitful place was a
wilderness and ALL THE CITIES THEREOF WERE BROKEN DOWN at the presence of Yahweh and by
His fierce anger. For this hath Yahweh said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet will I
not make a full end.
Therefore we do find buried ruins of
cities older than Adam and skeletons which has been dated by several means as being
several thousands of years older than Adam. The Bible itself tells us about this.
Next the Bible tells us about the creation
of MEN, IN THE PLURAL in Genesis 1:26-28 saying:
Male and female created he THEM and
Yahweh told these people, Be fruitful and multiply and REPLENISH the earth.
Plenish is an obsolete English word
meaning to fill. You cannot REPLENISH what was never plenished, or filled, before. In
Genesis chapter 2, we find THE ADAM (in the singular) formed. The Hebrew word
aw-dawm, rendered Adam in English, is from a root word meaning TO SHOW BLOOD IN THE FACE
or OF A RUDDY COMPLEXION, a word obviously not applicable to the dark races, which we also
know from scientific evidence to be much older than the White Race. Bible scholars know
And Adam called his wifes name
Eve because she was the mother of all living, is a later interpolation, which was
not in the earlier manuscripts. (See Moffetts Translation)
Genesis chapter 4 records the birth of
Cain and Abel. In the Hebrew, the wording suggests that they were twins. No other child of
Eve is mentioned until the birth of Seth, when Adam was 130 years old. Certainly this was
long after the birth of Cain and Abel, most scholars say this was over 100 years later.
Yet, when Cain killed Abel, and in punishment was driven out of the land, he complained to
Yahweh in Genesis 4:14:
Any one that findeth me shall slay
Upon being sent away, Cain found many
other people, for Genesis 4:17 records Cain not only married a wife, but built a city. You
dont build a city for just two people. These were the pre-Adamic races, mentioned in
the latter part of Genesis chapter 2.
There is no getting around it, for there
are many people who, upon reading this study will cry out You didnt tell us
where Cain got his wife; therefore he must have married his sister or some such
nonsense. So we will show you where Cain got his wife, and it was from these
Where Did Cain Get His Wife?
This is a question that has caused a lot
of controversy in Christians and one which they have avoided for centuries; especially the
JudeoChristians because most of them do very little if any serious Bible study. They
simply let some socalled member of the clergy tell them what is what.
Since Cain was banished to the land of
Nod, after his brother's murder, and before Eve gave birth to her third son Seth (Compare
Genesis 4:817 with Genesis 4:25), then there was as yet only one (supposed) descendant of
Adam on earth, and this was the reprobate Cain. We know that Cain had a wife, and evidence
would indicate that he had taken a female from among the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, ONE OF THE
After the birth of his first son, Enoch,
Cain built a city (Genesis 4:17). THERE CAN BE NO CITY WITHOUT INHABITANTS AND THOSE WHO
INHABITED THE CITY WHICH HE BUILT WERE OBVIOUSLY THE INHABITANTS OF THE LAND OF NOD, the
same creating that had been given to Adam as servants in the Garden of Eden. They were
driven forth with Adam, and became wanderers, which is the meaning of the word NOD. These
were a numerous people who had been CREATED (Genesis 1:27) before the FORMATION of Adam.
Before Cain was driven forth from the
presence of God, he complained:
"My punishment is greater than I can
bear, Behold, Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy
face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall
come to pass that everyone that findeth me shall slay me." (Genesis 4:1314)
A fugitive from whom? Certainly not his
father and mother, Adam and Eve! From who then would he be forced to flee? And to whom did
he refer when he spoke about "everyone that findeth me shall kill me?" It would
be none other than the inhabitants of the land of Nod, and these inhabitants, we believe
were THE OTHER RACES, THE BEAST OF THE FIELD.
So God put a mark upon Cain(we are not
told what it was) and gave a command that whosoever slew Cain, his vengeance would fall
seven fold. (Possibly Cain was made to resemble the people of Nod). In any case, he was
able to assemble enough people to build a city and the female he took as his wife, was not
a descendant of Adam.
A very expressive term can be found in the
book of Jude, in the New Testament, when he describes the great sin of Sodom as
"going after strange flesh." That is a very descriptive term. The Sodomites were
given to every imaginable sexual perversion, just as they are today (See Genesis 19:19),
and it was for this fifth that they were eliminated. These Sodomites were Canaanites (See
Genesis 10:1519). It is most significant that Cain, is mentioned in this context in Jude
Note that Jude first mentions the angels
which kept not their first estate. These may or may not have been the "sons of God
who married daughters of men." (There is a great deal of argument on this among Bible
Then Jude speaks of the Sodomites who were
destroyed for the same wickedness; "going after strange flesh." These as brute
BEASTS CORRUPT THEMSELVES, he says, and pronounces:
"Woe unto them, because they have
gone in the way of Cain." (Jude 611)
Thus the wickedness of Cain, the
wickedness of the Sodomites, all appear to be similar. All these filthy dreamers defiled
themselves by filthy sexual intercourse with "strange flesh." (Verse 8) The
civilization of Cain was very wicked and was completely wiped out by the flood. The fate
of Sodom is known to every Bible reader.
When Jeremiah wrote concerning the
Babylonian captivity of the Judahites, he said:
"And now I have given all these lands
into the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, My servant; and the BEASTS OF THE
FIELD, have I given him also to serve him." (See Jeremiah 27:6)
when prophesying of the destruction of Babylon, he wrote,
"O Lord, Thou hast spoken against
this place, to cut it off, that none shall remain in it, neither MAN OR BEAST, but it
shall be desolate forever." (Jeremiah 51:62)
This prophecy was fulfilled ages ago, and
it is most significant to find that the ancient ruins of Babylon abound with fourfooted
animals but that MEN, and the BEASTS OF THE FIELD, THE OTHER RACES, ARE COMPLETELY ABSENT
FROM THIS AREA.
From these facts, we can only conclude
that the BEASTS OF THE FIELD are indeed a servant race, distinct and separate from the
Adamic creation of God, but who have a special place and calling in God. They are vocal,
intelligent, capable of prayer, and repentance. The pure Negro stock is a servant order,
as are the angels in heaven.
The Garden of Eden was not a plantation of
ordinary trees and shrubs. Yahweh did nothing so foolish as to make a special creation,
just to have a man to wield shovel and pruning shears, when He already had millions of
pre-Adamites available for this type of work. We are told that the Garden of Eden
contained the tree of the knowledge (or experience) of good and evil. No tree of the
forest has any knowledge or experience of either good or evil. Ezekiel chapter 31 says,
Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon, with fair branches and a shadowing
bough and of an high stature; Therefore his height was exalted above all the trees of the
field and his boughs were multiplied and his branches became long; all the fowls of heaven
made their nests in his boughs and under his branches did all the beasts of the field
bring forth their young and under his shadow dwelt all great nations. THE CEDARS IN THE
GARDEN OF YAHWEH could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs and the
chestnut trees were not like his branches; NOR ANY TREE IN THE GARDEN OF YAHWEH WAS LIKE
UNTO HIM IN HIS BEAUTY. I have made him fair by the multitude of his branches: SO THAT ALL
THE TREES OF EDEN THAT WERE IN THE GARDEN OF YAHWEH ENVIED HIM.
Obviously, the trees in the garden of
Yahweh in Eden were family trees of races and nations who admired and envied the early
Assyrian empire. These made up the garden that Adam was to cultivate. Satan had been what
we might call the superintendent of this planet, to rule it in obedience to Yahwehs
will, until he forfeited his position by rebellion against Yahweh.
Adam was sent to take his place. It was
Adams job to rule the various nations and races of the earth as Yahwehs
representative here, educating them in Yahwehs laws and enforcing obedience to those
laws. These other races and nations had been here long before Adam. Therefore the Bible
makes it unmistakably clear we are not all descended from Adam and Eve, for there were
other races on earth, already old, already numerous, when Adam was formed.
Among these other races there are several
who are simply pre-Adamic and one at least, which is satanic. If you will read the third
chapter of Genesis, you will notice that, immediately after the fall of Adam, when Yahweh
required them to answer what they had done, Yahweh condemned Satan. The word mistranslated
serpent is the Hebrew word naw-khash, which literally means enchanter or magician.
No doubt Satan still possessing angelic
powers, was able to be an enchanter or magician. It is certain the one who seduced Eve was
no mere scaly snake wriggling along on the ground. Seduced Eve, for this is what she
admitted in the original Hebrew. Cain was the son of this seduction. The Bible uses the
word begat with monotonous regularity but, the first time the Bible ever says Adam ever
begat anyone is Genesis 5:3 where it says,
And Adam lived an hundred and thirty
years and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image: and called his name
To get back to Genesis 3:15, Yahweh said
I will put enmity between THEE and
the WOMAN and between THY SEED and HER SEED.
The same Hebrew word for seed is used in
both cases. Therefore, it is clear for all those who understand the English language, that
Satan was to have just as literal seed, or descendants, as Eve. Yahwehs own word
being pledged to his, we must expect to find it actually happening and we do. Yahshua tell
us of it.
In Matthew 13:38-39 explaining the parable
of the tares among the wheat Yahshua says,
THE FIELD IS THE WORLD; THE GOOD
SEED ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM: BUT THE TARES ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE
WICKED ONE: THE ENEMY THAT SOWED THEM IS THE
In John 6:70-71 Yahshua had been talking
with His twelve disciples and we read:
Yahshua answered them, Have not I
chosen you twelve and ONE OF YOU IS A DEVIL? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon:
for he it was that should betray him being one of the twelve.
You should read carefully John chapter 8
where Yahshua told those who hated him,
YE ARE OF THE DEVIL AND THE LUSTS
FOR YOUR FATHER YE WILL DO...He that is of God heareth God's words: ye therefore hear them
not, because YE ARE NOT OF GOD. (John 8:44, 47)
He was not being vulgarly abusive in
either of these cases, for He never resorted to name calling so His statement was
precisely accurate. He did call some of them serpents, children of vipers, which was
accurate. Long before this, they had adopted THE SERPENT as a symbol of Satan. This is why
their tradition had given the word naw-khash the translation serpent, when it really means
enchanter. Yahshua therefore was telling them that they were of their father the devil (or
serpent, fi they preferred that word). In this He was simply stating a biological fact
with scientific precision and identifying the persons of this ancestry.
Whenever someone tells you the Bible is in
conflict with what modern science has proven true, dont you believe it. The things
many Judeo-Christian preachers teach are in conflict with scientific truth, as we all
know, but these preachers are equally in conflict with the Bible. Go back to the Bible,
not to any man made doctrines and double check it for accuracy of translation. You will
find what the Bible really says, in its original languages, is accurate and with a
precision our scientists have not yet achieved.
evidence that descendants of "chay" and descendants of "adam" are two
Gen 1:2 And the
earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit
of God moved upon the face of the waters.
Gen 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth after
his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after
his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Gen 1:25 And God430 made6213 (853) the beast2416 of the earth776 after his kind,4327 and cattle929 after their kind,4327
and every thing3605 that
creepeth7431 upon the earth127 after his kind:4327 and God430 saw7200 that3588 it was good.2896
Note that the word
"beast" is translated from the Hebrew word "chay" and that it would be
more accurate to translate it as man, or a non-Adamite human, and that it's the word
"cattle" which is translated from the Hebrew word "behemah" which
would be more accurate if it were translated as beast:
H2416 -- chay -- khah'ee
H2421; alive; hence raw (flesh); fresh (plant, water, year), strong;
also (as noun, especially in the feminine singular and masculine plural) life (or
living thing), whether literally or figuratively: - + age, alive, appetite, (wild) beast,
company, congregation, life (-time), live (-ly), living (creature, thing), maintenance, +
merry, multitude, + (be) old, quick, raw, running, springing, troop.
H929 -- behe^ma^h -- be-hay-maw'
From an unused
root (probably meaning to be mute); properly a dumb beast; especially any
large quadruped or animal (often collectively): - beast, cattle.
The way this Scripture SHOULD
read is: "And God made the man of the earth after his kind, and beast after
their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it
was good." In the following Scripture, the word "man" is
translated from the Hebrew word Adam, and should never have been translated as man.
Gen 1:26 And
God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
This Scripture SHOULD read:
And God said, Let us make Adam in our image, after our likeness: and let them have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and
over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
From H119; ruddy, that is, a human being (an
individual or the species, mankind, etc.): - X another, + hypocrite, + common sort,
X low, man (mean, of low degree), person.
Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created
he him; male and female created he them.
Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Gen 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed
every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would
call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the name thereof.
Jos 3:16 That the waters4325 which came down3381 from above4480,
4605 stood5975 and rose up6965 upon a259 heap5067 very3966 far7368 from the city5892 Adam,4480,
121 that834 is beside4480, 6654 Zaretan:6891 and those that came down3381 toward5921 the sea3220 of the
plain,6160 even the salt4417 sea,3220 failed,8552 and were cut off:3772 and the people5971 passed over5674 right against5048 Jericho.3405
Jos 3:17 And the priests3548 that bore5375 the ark727 of the covenant1285
of the LORD3068 stood5975 firm3559 on dry ground2724 in the midst8432 of Jordan,3383 and all3605 the
Israelites3478 passed over5674 on dry ground,2724 until5704,
834 all3605 the people1471 were
passed5674 clean8552 over5674 (853) Jordan.3383