Our kikes have argued ad infinitum that it's just and fair to lynch [read: assassinate] a duly elected official of a foreign nation whose populace poses ZERO threat to the average American, that torturing members of this populace and even their parents is justified, that the pristine principles of the US Constitution, including free exercise of religion, must take second place to this "war on terror", and that lynching is one of the most acceptable and humane forms of assassination [er, execution].
Never mind that the entire world, including ALL of our former allies, now HATES us with an unbridled passion--let's accept this at face value.
Never mind that the trial of Saddam never produced a SINGLE American killed, tortured, imprisoned, nor even disrespected by Saddam or even one Iraqi.
Never mind that ZERO evidence exists that he even supported [much less perpetrated] 911 nor still held the weapons of mass destruction which WE profited from by selling to HIM.
Never mind that not a SINGLE one of the 650,000 Iraqi children, women, nor men we killed in this "undeclared war" was EVER proven to be behind 911, was EVER proven to have so much as cursed one of our soldiers much less killed American civilians, nor was EVER proven to have even SEEN these weapons of mass destruction.
Ditto for the 1.5 million mostly women and children who died as the result of our blockade of food, medicine, and clean water.
Never mind that not a SINGLE Iraqi allegedly killed by Saddam was ever proven to NOT deserve execution in his internal Iraqi civil war, that we NEVER disputed that Iraq's murder rate was LESS than ONE SIXTEENTH of what it was in our own nation's capitol, the District of Columbia, when our nation's fearless white leaders first attacked Iraq and studiously ignored the genocide of the White Race right outside their back window.
Never mind that WE killed 217 Iraqis for every one of the 3,000 soldiers THEY supposedly killed in Iraq--nor that 3,000 soldiers is the number you'd expect to be killed in a war this size JUST from accidents and friendly fire.
Let's accept the lowered standard of proof, the new era of assassination of former allies, the humanity of lynching, genocide of entire populaces, dissolving our own constitutions and religious rights, as just and fair.
What other former allies or enemies deserve such treatment?
What about Ariel Sharon who we KNOW KILLED 32 American soldiers on the USS Liberty? This is not idle speculation. Every single eye witness confirms it. If Saddam deserved to be lynched for killing NO Americans, then Ariel deserves to be lynched, post mortem of course, 32 times, once for each US Sailor who the WORLD knows HE killed.
What about Donald Rumsfeld whose ramrodding of aspartame onto an unwilling and unsuspecting populace [US] resulted in the killing and maiming of millions of Americans?
What about the Emperor of Japan--a pagan--who was PROVEN to be the mastermind behind Pearl Harbor and our entry into W.W.II, who has the blood of 264 million FELLOW CHRISTIANS [not merely several million alien enemy foreign Muslims] on his hands, NONE of whose family, staff, nor close relatives were EVER punished for this "day of infamy". Isn't it time for his neck tie party? Isn't the statute of limitations for genocide--NEVER? If our kikes are so worried about getting justice for several alien enemy foreign Muslims, then CERTAINLY we who foot the bill for this disgrace deserve justice for the 264 MILLION fellow Christians around the world who died as a DIRECT result of the Emperor's strategies and policies?
Under our new standard of justice, how much more severely should WE punish a foreign leader who was DIRECTLY responsible for the death a fellow Christian, than we punish a foreign leader for killing an alien enemy foreign Muslim? Most Americans care so little about what happens to Muslims that they see little sense in having 3,000 of OUR soldiers die in order to supposedly protect Muslims. It would be extremely conservative to estimate that, to a just Christian nation, the death of a fellow Christian is one hundred times as egregious as the death of an alien enemy foreign Muslim, making the Emperor's crime against us worthy of 26.4 billion neck tie parties. If we hanged him one thousand times a day, it would take more than 7,200 years to finally hang him enough to meet our new standard of justice. Would drawing and quartering him a thousand times be more humane?
Surely you can think of a few others who deserve this justice.
The author, a veteran of the "it became necessary to destroy the village in order to save it" war, lived in a Muslim nation for 13 months and never once met a Muslim he didn't have the greatest respect for. The point is not to degrade Muslims, but to put into perspective the infinite hypocrisy of our failure to protect our own, while pretending [ala. Vietnam] that the only way to protect Muslims is to kill them.