Well, at least we now know, Willie, that Kirk is a kike.

 

Nobody else is this dumb.

 

Of course he won't comprehend the following, but we need to set the record straight, anyway for those who might accept  anything Kirk says at face value.  Kirk claims that the "The Bible does NOT mention race once", which is not only in error, but it is a flat out LIE to anyone who's ever opened the cover of a Holy Bible:

  1. It mentions jews 244 times, and jews were and are a race.
  2. It mentions Israelites 18 times, and Israelites were and are a RACE.
  3. It mentions Moabites 18 times, and Moabites were a RACE.
  4. It mentions Ammonites 19 times, and Ammonites were a RACE.
  5. It mentions Ethiopians 27 times, and Ethiopians were a RACE.
  6. It mentions the Canaans 91 times, and they were a RACE.
  7. It mentions Egyptians 87 times, and they were a RACE.
  8. It mentions Hebrews 22 times, and Hebrews were a RACE (though jews were not Hebrews, because they were not descendants of Eber).

 

(Deu 23:3) An Ammonite5984 or Moabite4125 shall not enter935 into the congregation6951 of the LORD3068; even to their tenth6224 generation1755 shall they not enter935 into the congregation6951 of the LORD3068 for5704 ever5769:

Moabite:  the designation of a tribe descended from Moab, the son of Lot (Gen_19:37).

 

(Jer 13:23) Can the Ethiopian3569 change2015 his skin5785, or the leopard5246 his spots2272? then may3201 ye also do good3190, that are accustomed3928 to do evil7489. accustomed: Heb. taught

Canaan

(1.) The fourth son of Ham (Gen_10:6). His descendants were under a curse in consequence of the transgression of his father (Gen_9:22-27). His eldest son, Zidon, was the father of the Sidonians and Phoenicians. He had eleven sons, who were the founders of as many tribes (Gen_10:15-18).

This fact is IMPOSSIBLE for a Christian to miss.

 

John Knight

 


----- Original Message -----

From: Willie Martin

To: ChristianPatriot@yahoogroups.com

Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:23 AM

Subject: Re: [ChristianPatriot] Re: mamzer = bastard = Strong's #4464


  John can you believe it, I gave kirkz the kike a list of books to
read, but he is too illerate to read them, and still thinks the Khazar
jews are Israelites. Boy what a dumb bunny. 

kirkz@nettaxi.com wrote:
>
> John,
>     "Heathens" were unbelievers. The Jews/Israelites were believers.
> The verse states is in regard to believers conceiving children with
> unbelievers under God's covenant with Israel.
>      The Bible does NOT mention race once. Salvation never has nor
> does have anything to do with race.
>      KZ
>
> --- In ChristianPatriot@y..., "Christian Party" <tcffc2000@y...>
> wrote:
> >
> > Kirk,
> >
> > The LEAST you could do before you make such STUPID statements is
> look in
> > Strong's Concordance, where you would have found that the
> word "heathen" is
> > translated from the Greek word "ethnos", which is Strong's #1484,
> which
> > means RACE, not religion:
> >
> >
> > ======================
> > 1484  ethnos  eth'-nos:  probably from 1486; a race (as of the same
> habit),
> > i.e. a tribe; specially, a foreign (non-Jewish) one (usually, by
> > implication, pagan):--Gentile, heathen, nation, people.
> > ======================
> >
> >
> > "Heathen" has nothing to do with religious belief, other than the
> fact that
> > different RACES practice different religions.
> >
> > Had The Holy Bible intended to refer to *religious belief*, it
> would have
> > used the word "pagan", which is "one who is not a Christian, a
> Mohammedan,
> > nor a jew" or "a person who worships false gods".
> >
> > There is a very distinct difference here which cannot be ignored,
> especially
> > since "bastard" is defined as "mongrel", which is defined by
> Webster as:
> >
> > MONGREL, a. [See Mingle.] Of a mixed breed; of different kinds.
> >
> > A mondgrel can be of any religion, or of  no religion, so you
> cannot claim
> > that "heathen" even implies "religious orientation" [to use a
> lemming term].
> > http://fathersmanifesto.com/bastard.htm
> >
> > John Knight
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <kirkz@n...>
> > To: <ChristianPatriot@y...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 11:57 PM
> > Subject: [ChristianPatriot] Re: mamzer = bastard = Strong's #4464