John Birdman Birdbrain BryantJohn Birdbrain Bryant's Expose of David Irving is an Expose of John Birdbrain Bryant
Prior to reading the following page, Birdman Bryant appeared to be a fair and objective observer, writer and researcher! However, his request "above all to remove the anti-Jewish remarks which, whether true or not, are inappropriate in the present context", coupled with his acceptance of the insult of the real scientists who did the real research which Einstein plagiarized as "half-mad anti-Semitic ones during the Nazi years", confirmed the worst suspicions: Birdman is very likely a birdbrain jew.
However, his following statement is a WARNING to us all about how invasive the jew infiltration of the US actually is:
There is NO SUCH THING. A jew wouldn't be caught dead "upholding the glory of the white race". It's a known fact that jews DETEST the "White Race", "Cacuasians", Israelites, and anything else to do with the "white race", who they are taught from birth, sunup to sundown "prefer sex with cows". Note the lower case 'w' and the lower case 'r' that Birdbrain uses in reference to HIS putative race, proof that Birdbrain himself thinks that he's one of "God's Chosen People".
Do not trust another word this jew writes. EVER!
We do NOT EVER need "a number of people in the pro-white movement who are Jewish", and they will NEVER, EVER be "more than welcome as far as I am concerned".
Some of us almost trusted some of his writings, but got suspicious when he caved in on his almost complete research behind the MORON Einstein. Now we know why.
Here's another paragraph which PROVES, once and for all, that Birdbrain is a jew:
The creme de la creme of Birdbrain's jewery is his following statement on his home page:
Nobody but the jew could have the chuzpah to assert that the concept of "free speech" incorporates his "right" to use profane language in a public forum where our children are present, at the very same moment that he implores us "above all to remove the anti-Jewish remarks which, whether true or not, are inappropriate in the present context"!
You're a KIKE, Birdman!
KIKE! KIKE! KIKE!
Exposing David Irving
Here are the FACTS regarding Einstein which Birdbrain "missed"
Also, since this link is now missing http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-EinsteinWasAFraud-Correspondence.html you can see a permanent, indelible copy at www.archive.org, at this url: http://web.archive.org/web/20030211173510/http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Others/Others-EinsteinWasAFraud-Correspondence.html
Correspondence on "Einstein Was a Fraud"
To whom it may concern:
Thanks for your inquiry to the Niels Bohr
Library. I have looked at the article in question. It is completely without value. Of
course it is true that Einstein built on the work of his predecessors, and in his work, as
in the work of all scientists, one can easily trace ideas that were already present in one
or another form. Even the greatest scientific work consists largely of combining,
rethinking and clarifying concepts that are in the air. Einstein actually went
considerably beyond this. The paper has too many errors to be worth detailed analysis. Let
me just mention the first extremely ignorant error in it. This is the statement that
Maxwell already showed the constancy of the speed of light. Einstein's great contribution
(well, one of his many great contributions) was the fantastic hypothesis that the speed of
light is constant in all reference frames--something Maxwell literally could not conceive,
something that all other physicists of his time and down to Einstein's found almost
unthinkable, and yet something which every experiment has shown to be completely true.
To: Pastor VS Herrell From: John Bryant Re: Einstein article CC: various
Yesterday I sent an email message to about 10 experts in the history of science and/or relativity theory asking them to read the article Einstein Was a Fraud. I have received just 2 responses, both negative, tho one respondee seemed not to have read the article. The other response is given below. I am going to publish it along with the article, and I welcome your response, if you care to make one (If you do not, I will note the fact). I now have less confidence that the article is correct, so I urge you to put your article in proper scholarly form, to seek properly qualified individuals who will support you (or correct your errors), and above all to remove the anti-Jewish remarks which, whether true or not, are inappropriate in the present context. -jb
A Perspective on Jews and 'Haters'
By John "Birdman" Bryant
One of the most important facts of history -- and, for that matter, one of the most neglected -- is that whites built Western civilization, that Western civilization stands as the apex of human social creation, and that while some other races have successfully imitated Western civilization (eg, the Japanese) or have built civilizations notable for their sophistication (eg, the Incas and Chinese), none of these races has come close to equaling on their own what whites have accomplished. Yet today, in every area of the world from America and Europe to Australia, South Africa and Zimbabwe, the white race is under unremitting attack by the political left, whose advocacy of 'multiculturalism', unrestricted immigration, 'affirmative action' and similar policies, along with the constant media defamation of whites as 'racist', 'prejudiced', 'intolerant' and 'haters' is resulting in the slow genocide of whites, and the slow culturacide and return to barbarism of Western civilization. And in all this warfare against whites and their civilization there is one curious and profound fact that no person with half a brain can possibly ignore: The Left is -- and has always been -- principally led and significantly populated by a single tiny ethnic minority: Jews.
But if the above is true, it does not necessarily follow that most Jews wish to see the genocide of the white (gentile) race or the end of Western civilization. Most have probably not connected the dots between their politics and the behavior of their ethnic brethren on the one hand and the demise of whites and the West on the other. But whatever the guilt or innocence of ordinary Jews in this matter, the facts cannot be denied: The Jewish establishment -- ie, the organizations which claim in some sense to 'represent' Jewish people and which are supported by them -- are irreconcilably leftist, and thus hostile to basic American and Western values -- free speech (the Left wants to make 'hate speech' a crime), national self-determination (the Left supports world government), the right of association (the left supports 'anti-discrimination' laws), the right to keep and bear arms (the Left supports 'gun control'), honest money (the Left supports government fiat currency), free markets (the Left wants 'fair trade' and 'economic justice') -- and are actively working to extinguish these values. And with 85-90% of the Jewish electorate voting leftist in America and probably similarly in other countries, there is no doubt that, speaking generally, the Jews represent a significant danger to the West.
But since Jews are intelligent, and in fact significantly more intelligent than whites, and since leftism has proved itself a failure everywhere and in every respect, we have to ask, Why are the Jews still leftists, and still leaning on the throttle of the engine which is carrying Western civilization over the cliff to oblivion? The answer may be partly their group cohesiveness, which makes them more inclined to act in the interest of the group, and thus to trust the leftist/socialist ethic over the Western individualist one. It may be due to their leaders, who influence them in a leftist direction. It may be due to the general influence of the leftist media, which now dominate the West, and which just so happen to be under largely Jewish control. And it may be, as Prof Kevin Macdonald has suggested, that leftism is good for Jews, because while it destroys Western culture, it allows Jews to become even more dominant over what remains.
But if 90% of Jews are leftist, 10% are not, and that 10% could be -- and in fact often has been -- more than useful to the white racial/Western cultural struggle. For example, some of the most important libertarians have been Jews -- 'Mr Libertarian' Murray Rothbard, Nobelist Milton Friedman, LP Vice-Presidential candidate Nancy Lord, libertarian popularizer Ayn Rand, and many others. Again, whites would be out in left field (snicker, chortle) without the numerous Jews who have exposed their brethren's anti-gentilism, including Israel Shahak, Benjamin Freedman and Norman Finkelstein, to name only three who are familiar. Furthermore, Holocaust revisionism has depended significantly on Jews, including David Cole, who secured an on-camera confession from curator Franczek Piper that the Auschwitz 'gas chambers' were fakes, Liberty Lobby lawyer Mark Lane, who has consistently secured legal victories in leftist attacks on revisionism, John Sack, who has just broken into the conventional media with a long revisionist article in Esquire, and Third Reich historian David Irving, the one-man London blitzkrieg, who is half-Jewish. Even Nazism, whose official policy was to regard Jews as inferiors and undesirables, was shot thru with Jews, from the Jews and mischlings (persons of mixed white and Jewish parentage) who made up a sizeable number of Hitler's generals, to Hitler himself, who was probably the grandson of a Rothschild.
It has often been alleged by the Left that those involved in the attempt to preserve the white race and Western culture are 'haters', implying not merely persons inclined to an exaggerated emotional reaction to their opponents, but to irrational and pathological ones. However, given the full frontal assault on whites and their culture by the Left, a full head of hatred for both the Left and the mangy minority garbage which is one of the Left's most important tools of destruction could hardly be inappropriate, much less exaggerated, irrational or pathological. Nevertheless, the charge of 'haters' is false, particularly in regard to Jews themselves; for while supporters of the white race and Western culture may harbor a perfectly rational degree of fear and distrust toward Jews, I think it may reasonably be asserted that movement people actually have considerable positive feelings for Jews in the sense of respecting (if not envying) them for their intelligence, industry, wealth, power and -- yes -- beauty, tho these positive feelings hardly do anything to alleviate the concern that Jewish leftists are going to complete the destruction that they seem hell-bent on accomplishing.
There are two points here that I am driving at. The first is that it is high time for people in our movement to acknowledge their positive feelings for Jews, and to stop behaving so as to fuel the charge of 'haters' which has been used against us so effectively by the Left. The second point is that we must not merely openly embrace the Jews who will give us help, but we must cultivate that help. We can do this in part by pointing to self- interest: that we -- Jew and gentile -- will all be poorer -- both economically and culturally -- without Western civilization and the white race, and that this culture is of prime value to Jews because it has allowed them to thrive as no other civilization on earth. But there is another argument from self-interest to which we can and must direct Jewish attention: If Jews, who constitute less than 3% of the population, continue to threaten the other 97%, then they are doing little more than requesting a genuine Holocaust -- an event from which -- once the sleeping white giant awakens -- there are unlikely to be many 'survivors'.