Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 
 

IWF Home Page

About IWF

Calendar of Events

Issues

Publications

Speakers/Op-Eds

The Women's Quarterly

Join IWF

Op-Ed - 01/01/97
Single Sex Education

Who Should Decide About Single-Sex Education? 

Anita K. Blair

The Post's editorial "Junior High and VMI" (Sept. 7) raises some strong issues concerning the fate of the Young Women's Leadership School in East Harlem and other single-sex education experiments after the Supreme Court decision against the Virginia Military Institute. Regrettably, that decision provides powerful support to opponents of those programs. 

The American Civil Liberties Union, the National Organization for Women and others argue that the East Harlem school, as a public program, may not exclude any qualified individual merely based on his or her sex. The VMI decision says exactly that, and it allows no excuses based on what girls or boys of any age or situation want or need. 

Most people trust the media's assurances that the Supreme Court's recent ruling affects only VMI and The Citadel. Few, it seems, have actually read Justice Ginsburg's 41-page opinion. In fact, Justice Ginsburg in VMI crafted a new Equal Protection standard, "skeptical scrutiny," which applies to all state laws and state actions classifying persons by gender.  

Formerly, states could treat men and women differently if the practice was "substantially related to important governmental objectives." Now, to survive skeptical scrutiny, states must demonstrate "an exceedingly persuasive justification" for treating the sexes differently. Specifically, no justification will be found persuasive if it relies on "overbroad generalizations about the different talents, capacities or preferences of males and females."  

How does this test work? In the VMI case, the lower courts credited expert testimony that single-sex schools are pedagogically valid and effective because of developmental differences between male and female adolescents. Justice Ginsburg excluded all such testimony, saying, "State actors controlling gates to opportunity, we have instructed, may not exclude qualified individuals based on 'fixed notions concerning the roles and abilities of males and females.'"  

Would a "truly equal option" for boys, as the Post suggests, cure New York's constitutional problem? Well, what real-world school board would vote to subsidize a program that teaches boys "self-esteem" and limits their athletics and sports programs to those enjoyed by the girls across the street? Yet, if educators fashioned a parallel program aimed at boys' needs and tried to exclude girls, they would flunk skeptical scrutiny, which disallows any justification based on "generalizations" about either sex. 

The Post's editorial ended with a prayer that the courts - George Will calls them "our robed masters" - will "find room for" some single-sex educational programs. The Constitution was originally intended to let the people, through their elected representatives, decide such matters. Indeed, the people of New York, Virginia and elsewhere, including countless parents and teachers, support having the option of public single-sex education for their daughters and their sons.  

As dissenting Justice Scalia predicted, and the East Harlem case illustrates, the VMI decision makes it legally impractical and financially impossible to establish single-sex programs in public systems. The majority of justices who voted against VMI were unmoved by facts, experience, logic or common sense. We might as well pray, burn hecatombs and sacrifice some youths. Maybe then the High Court in Washington will heed us, the people. 

Ms. Blair is Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Independent Women's Forum and author of its amicus curiae brief in the Supreme Court case, supporting Virginia and VMI. She is also a member of the VMI Board of Visitors.

 
Want to contact us? Email us at info@iwf.org or call 1-800-224-6000. 
 
Opinion| Survey: Lies or Opinions?| Justice Ginzberg's Background| Syllabus| UVa Speech| Biography| Ginzberg & Gays| Picture| VMI Forum| Dissenting Opinion| Excerpts from Dissenting Opinion| Guestbook| Phyllis Schaffley on VMI
 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party