Richard Ochs does a great job of critiquing born againism or the born again movement and the error made by Nicodemus when he asked Jesus must a man be born again when he is oldbut then turns right around in the following statement and makes exactly the same mistake Nicodemus made, a statement Jesus would correct just as He bluntly and sternly corrected Nicodemus:
<<<You may protest that this makes God the ultimate determiner of who is saved. To this the apostles and prophets with one voice cry, "Amen!" "Salvation is from the Lord." Christians, as John puts it in the opening chapter of his gospel, are people, "who were born not of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." (John l:13) That's why we give thanks to God when someone is converted.>>>
Heres the key to what Jesus said to Nicodemus:
John 3:6 That which is begotten of the flesh is flesh; and that which is begotten of the Spirit is spirit.
Who was begotten of the flesh in Pauls allegory in Galatians 4? Ishmael, and allegorically all non-Israelites. Who was begotten of the spirit in his allegory? Israelites. What this means is that if a person is begotten of two Israelite parents, theyre begotten of the spirit, and if theyre begotten of two Ishmaelite parents (or allegorically two non-Israelite parents), theyre begotten of the flesh. It also means that if a person is begotten of one Israelite parent and one Ishmaelite parent, then they are also begotten of the flesh and that they and their descendants can never be begotten of the spirit.
Did Nicodemus ever understand what Jesus meant? Probably not. And neither does Richard Ochs.
As this may have been spoken in Aramaic, written at one time in ancient Hebrew, translated into ancient Greek, translated again into modern Greek, translated into KJV English, and now is being evaluated from the perspective of modern English, its easy enough to see why so many people have lost track of the significance of this one simple statement made by Jesus. But this is the only possible meaning of what Jesus said. He disputed precisely the notion that Richard Ochs parrots from Nicodemus above, the precise mistake made by those he aptly critiques.
Richard R. Ochs
There is much
talk these days about the rapid growth of the cults. Jehovah's Witnesses,
Christian Science, Mormonism, the
combined effect of all these groups is overshadowed by a movement that in the
last few years has grown to include over 30% of the
Born-againism has permeated fundamentalist denominations as leaven in dough, and expanded into the culture at large. Candidates espouse it in order to get votes, entertainers use it to attract crowds, pro-football players proclaim it to give respect to their Sunday afternoon brutality, and the business world promotes it in order to make money. Even the secular press, radio and T.V. have found it fashionable to occasionally slip the little words "born again" into their speech and print.
That the world has jumped on the Born-again bandwagon in order to exploit it is sad but not surprising. We really shouldn't expect anything else from the spiritually blind worldling. The real tragedy is that the whole mess was spawned and spread by the "Church" and is now lauded as a great revival of Christianity.
The truth is
that much of contemporary evangelicalism, like the
course it was, and without this there is no true Christianity. But error cloaked in Biblical terms is still error. In the case of the current "born-again" movement, Scriptural terminology is being used to teach just the opposite of its original meaning.
The great doctrine of man's need for regeneration (i.e. miraculous new birth) is being presented in a way that denies the very point it is supposed to teach. Stated simply the error is this -that men are "born-again" as a result of something "~" do. This something may be going forward" at the close of an evangelistic message, making a "decision" for Christ, or "repenting" and "believing" the gospel. Whatever the requirement that is put before the sinner, the impression is given that sinful man himself is the one who brings about his regeneration.
The sad results of such a teaching can be seen all around us. Evangelists who believe that men, dead in sin, can and will turn to God if the right kind of emotional and psychological inducement is presented, push and pressure lost people into making "decisions."
What ever is necessary to get people to come forward, or raise their hand, or sign a card, is tried by today's "soul winners." Highly emotional meetings, prolonged appeals, repeated musical choruses, and even the deceitful tactic of having counselors strategically placed in the audience to come forward at the time of the "appeal" -all smack of the techniques of crowd psychology.
Those who do come forward (or raise their hand, or sign a card) are then coached into believing that God has come into their lives, and that they are now "saved!" Deep down, though, they know that nothing has really happened. The evangelist has done something, the lost person has done something, but God has done nothing. There has been no miracle!
The person may give mental assent to the doctrine of the new birth and try to rejoice in it, but there has been no supernatural passing from death to life. (Eph.2:4-5)
This is why most of the "converts" of this kind of "born-againism " show no real zeal for God, and many fall away completely after a month of two. That some people are brought into the kingdom in these situations is no doubt true. But it is in spite of these methods, not because of them. If we turn to the section of Scripture most often quoted regarding the new birth we find the Lord teaching just the opposite of the modern "soul-winner. "
In the third chapter of John's Gospel, Jesus tells Nicodemus, "You must be born again." What did the Lord mean by this statement? First of all, it should be noted that Jesus said nothing of any action or decision that Nicodemus must make, nor did He even tell him to repent and believe the gospel. As a matter of fact, Jesus was not telling Nicodemus to do~anything! "You must be born again" was not a command Nicodemus was to obey; it was simply a statement of fact.
his blindness, misunderstood this statement and asked how anyone could do such
a thing as that -a man "cannot enter a second time into his mother's womb
and be born, can he"? To this, Jesus said in effect, "I'm not talking
about your doing anything, I'm talking about God doing
something." "I'm talking about the Spirit of God coming and
miraculously generating life in you. You, being flesh can only produce flesh.
Only the Spirit of God can produce the spiritual birth you must have in order
to enter the
The modern evangelist's techniques and teachings are conspicuously absent in this account. The Lord gave Nicodemus no "Four Spiritual Laws," nor any instructions of "How to be Born Again," and He certainly used on manipulative tricks. He was concerned to emphasize just one thing. Regeneration is a miraculous work of God's Spirit.
We can, and must, tell men to turn from their sins and believe the Gospel, but in doing this we should realize that when a man does repent and believe, it is the result of God's prior regenerative working within him. If this were not the case, if man must actually initiate his own salvation, then it would be impossible to escape the conclusion that men do not need regeneration at all, but possess in themselves, an innate goodness which causes them to seek after God. Though it be ever so slight, this goodness is then the ultimate reason why one man is saved and another is lost. But the apostle Paul clearly teaches the contrary when he writes:
There is none righteous, not even one;
There is none who understands,
There is none who seeks for God..
There is none who does good,
There is not even one. (Rom.3:10-12)
Here Paul states plainly that there is no "spark of goodness" in man that causes him to respond to the gospel. In fact, man, blinded by sin and Satan, does not even understand the gospel. He is in total rebellion against God and His truth. If regeneration were contingent upon man first desiring God, no one would ever be born again, for "there is none who seeks God."
Moreover, if man must ultimately be given credit for coming to God, Christianity is turned into just one more of the world's man-centered religions or cults which teach salvation by works. All such man- centered systems offer a false hope, for it is simply impossible for sinful man to make himself different than he is -he needs a new heart, he needs to be "born again!"
Again, it should be stressed that we are certainly to tell men to seek God. We must tell them to believe and receive Christ. But these commands will fall on spiritually deaf ears unless God first generates life through the inward workings of His Holy Spirit.
You may protest that this makes God the ultimate determiner of who is saved. To this the apostles and prophets with one voice cry, "Amen!" "Salvation is from the Lord." Christians, as John puts it in the opening chapter of his gospel, are people, "who were born not of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." (John l:13) That's why we give thanks to God when someone is converted.
We know that God has graciously wrought a miracle -the sovereign, supernatural miracle of the new birth.
This truth should give us confidence to present the pure gospel, knowing that it is not up to us to somehow maneuver and manipulate men into Christianity. It should also bring us to our knees before the God Who is sovereign in salvation. Only He can remove the heart of stone and give a new heart. Only He can give life to the dead. Only He deserves the blessing, glory and honor.