Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

Mona Charon

 

The unmistakable similarity between Mona Charon’s name and Ariel Sharon’s is something we must bear in mind when reading what this witch says about Ron Paul.  Both will burn in Hell for an eternity, and neither deserve a second of our time.  So why am I wasting seconds of my valuable time to write about it?  Because in this land of the free, home of the brave, fear of the jews will keep ANYONE from saying even one disparaging word about either of them.

Yet the vast majority of Americans wildly disagree with the atheist ideology advanced by these Talmud-munching deists.  So why do they not speak out?  Why are tens of millions of Americans as silent as church mice when the topic comes up?  Why do jews like Sharon and Charon have a license to STEAL, accompanied with a license to CENSOR, coupled with a license to DENY the Word of God, inbred with a license to PROHIBIT our own children from saying a simple prayer to God in buildings built by US, not jews?

The following statement is so vacuous and mind-numbing that it’s almost impossible to pick a place to start to critique it.  Only a small child would fail to grasp what Ron Paul meant so completely, except that would be an insult to the small children I know, because they DO grasp it.  And so do the 91% of Americans who want school prayer restored, and the 94% who demand that Bush be impeached, and the 90% who know the jews did 911.  The ONLY people who MIGHT accept such a farcical statement at face value are the 6% [including ALL jews] who are too STUPID to understand that impeachment is not a right—it’s a duty of a constitutional society to do so. 

Why do JEWS have such a CRIMINAL instinct that they’d insult a WHITE man who simply stands for principles, in the SAME breath they LIE and claim that he does NOT stand for principles?  BECAUSE THEIR MIND AND CONSCIENCE ARE DEFILED—there’s NO other explanation:

“Ron Paul is inconsistent. Though he calls himself a man of principle and is apparently admired as such by his ardent fans, his principles seem somewhat elastic. He rails against the Bush administration for its supposed assault on civil liberties, yet when he was asked at one of the debates whether Scooter Libby deserved a pardon, he said no. ‘He doesn't deserve one because he was instrumental in leading the Congress and the people to support a war that we didn't need to be in.’ Notice that he didn't say it was because Libby was guilty of committing a crime. No, because Libby argued for a policy with which Paul disagreed, he deserved to serve time in prison. Ron Paul, the libertarian, who presumably values liberty above all, is willing to deprive someone else of his because of a policy disagreement?”

http://www.whereistheoutrage.net/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/scooter%20libby.jpg

 

To claim that Ron Paul does NOT believe that Libby should have been imprisoned for BOTH, lying AND getting us into an illegal war, is:

1.       To ignore every other word he‘s ever spoken.

2.       To ignore that getting us into an ILLEGAL war is a FAR more serious CRIME than simply lying.

3.       To ignore that it was his LIES which led to this ILLEGAL war.

4.       To ignore that depriving us of our civil liberties is even a WORSE CRIME than this war.

5.       To ignore that those who participated in this deprivation of our civil rights deserve THE DEATH PENALTY, not simply criticism from Ron Paul.

6.       To ignore that depriving CRIMINALS like Libby of their civil rights is PRECISELY what OUR law demands of us.

7.       To ignore that putting these CRIMINALS behind bars, or worse, is the ONLY way our civil liberties WILL be restored.

To refer to Ron Paul’s position on this ILLEGAL, undeclared, unconstitutional, unpopular, murderous, filthy, deadly, HATED war as simply a “policy disagreement” is to refer to the bomb we dropped on Nagasaki as a fly swatter.  This was not Libby’s “policy”—this is the policy of the entire administration which NINETY FOUR PERCENT OF AMERICANS WANT TO IMPEACH.

 

From this point forward, this unprincipled filthy cunt deserves nothing but our uttermost contempt.  If you search this web site, you’ll not find any woman ever referred to as a cunt.  In fact you won’t find this word on the web site AT ALL.  This is a word we’ve reserved expressly for Mona Charon.

CUNT:

“Ron Paul is historically challenged. He argues that by embracing isolationism, he fits within a Republican tradition stretching back to Eisenhower ‘who stopped the Korean War’ and including Nixon ‘who stopped the war in Vietnam.’ Let's recap. Eisenhower threatened to use nuclear weapons against China. It was the Eisenhower administration that had a hand in toppling Iran's Mohammad Mossedegh (an intervention that Paul has elsewhere cited as causing the U.S. grief 25 years later when the Islamists took power). Eisenhower also intervened in Guatemala, Cuba (planning for the Bay of Pigs began during his tenure) and Lebanon.

“Nixon, an isolationist? Most observers, whatever they may make of detente with the USSR and the opening to China, agree that Nixon was an emphatic internationalist. For the record, he intervened in many countries including Chili, Peru and Cambodia. And he saved Israel by resupplying her during the Yom Kippur war. Neither his successes nor failures grew out of a Paulesque policy of ‘minding our own business."’

 

WHO, other than this cunt and her fellow lowest 6% of the intelligentsia of this putative Christian nation could fail to grasp that Doctor Paul’s VERY POINT was that we SUPPORT politicians when they DO call for isolationism, as BUSH himself did, and we REJECT those who don’t.  When Nixon PROMISED to get out of Vietnam, WE SUPPORTED HIM.  When he refused to do so, we HATED him.  When Bush claimed he wanted a limited role for government, we SUPPORTED him.  When he attacked Iraq, NINEY FOUR PERCENT WANTED TO IMPEACH HIM.  It’s a very simple formula which even the simplest of minds should grasp.

Yet this cunt with a room temperature iq will never grasp that she doesn’t any more moral authority to claim that “Ron Paul is historically challenged” than she does to critique our neighbor’s cat’s poo, or to claim that Christopher Columbus was “geographically challenged”, or that Newton was “scientifically challenged”.  It’s an insult to children [or at least WHITE children] for such a cunt to be referred to as “childlike”.

CUNT:

“Ron Paul is unserious. Suggesting that you will eliminate the IRS, the CIA, the FBI and other government agencies within weeks of taking office is ridiculous. These are bumper stickers, not serious reform proposals.”

 

The 91% who voted in favor of Ron Paul in Florida [leaving the other 11 candidates who support the IRS only 9% to share amongst themselves] understood PRECISELY what Ron Paul said, which is that it would be his POSITION that this should be done, but that he would have MUCH opposition from MANY corners.  He’s even admitted that people like Charon who object would LOVE to kill him for taking that position.  To reduce his entire political platform to a mere bumper sticker doesn’t require a childlike mind—it requires a totally empty cunt mind.

CUNT:

“Ron Paul is too cozy with kooks and conspiracy theorists. As syndicated radio host Michael Medved has pointed out, Ron Paul's newspaper column was carried by the American Free Press (a parent publication of the Hitler-praising Barnes Review). Paul may not have been aware of this. But though invited by Medved to disavow any connection, Paul has so far failed to respond.”

When this hypocritical cunt stands up and insults Gore for appearing on the front cover of Rolling Stone Magazine with an erection, only THEN should we take such awkward criticism seriously.  All this means is that support for Ron Paul is so widespread that EVERY type of organization and individual supports him AND his long-held, unmistakable, well understood, historical, constitutional principles.

IM084051.jpg (47589 bytes)

 

CUNT:

“Ron Paul is the favorite candidate of a number of racist, neo-Nazi and conspiracist websites. While Paul cannot be held accountable for the views of cranks and kooks, he can disavow their support and return their checks. He received $500 from Don Black, the proprietor of Stormfront.org and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. He has not yet returned it”

 

This calls for EQUAL TIME.  We DEMAND, not just suggest, that ANYONE who received ANY contribution from AIPAC:

1.       CONTRIBUTE it to a CHRISTIAN charity, immediately

2.       REVOKE every vote they placed on behalf of AIPAC’s interests.

3.       DISAVOW every single thing AIPAC stands for or ever stood for.

4.       APOLOGIZE to the American people for permitting AIPAC to lead them into this ILLEGAL war.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20071116/cm_uc_crmchx/op_54409

 

Too Close to Kooky [Ron Paul]

Yahoo News ^ | Nov 16 2007 | Mona Charen

 

Posted on 11/17/2007 6:56:56 PM PST by camerakid400

 

Memo to: Ron Paul supporters

Subject: Your e-mails

Okay, enough is enough. Like every other journalist in America, and who knows, maybe the world or even the universe, I've been deluged with your letters and e-mails. So I've done as you asked and taken a closer look at your candidate. Here is what I've found:

1. Ron Paul is inconsistent. Though he calls himself a man of principle and is apparently admired as such by his ardent fans, his principles seem somewhat elastic. He rails against the Bush administration for its supposed assault on civil liberties, yet when he was asked at one of the debates whether Scooter Libby deserved a pardon, he said no. "He doesn't deserve one because he was instrumental in leading the Congress and the people to support a war that we didn't need to be in." Notice that he didn't say it was because Libby was guilty of committing a crime. No, because Libby argued for a policy with which Paul disagreed, he deserved to serve time in prison. Ron Paul, the libertarian, who presumably values liberty above all, is willing to deprive someone else of his because of a policy disagreement?

2. Ron Paul is historically challenged. He argues that by embracing isolationism, he fits within a Republican tradition stretching back to Eisenhower "who stopped the Korean War" and including Nixon "who stopped the war in Vietnam." Let's recap. Eisenhower threatened to use nuclear weapons against China. It was the Eisenhower administration that had a hand in toppling Iran's Mohammad Mossedegh (an intervention that Paul has elsewhere cited as causing the U.S. grief 25 years later when the Islamists took power). Eisenhower also intervened in Guatemala, Cuba (planning for the Bay of Pigs began during his tenure) and Lebanon.

Nixon, an isolationist? Most observers, whatever they may make of detente with the USSR and the opening to China, agree that Nixon was an emphatic internationalist. For the record, he intervened in many countries including Chili, Peru and Cambodia. And he saved Israel by resupplying her during the Yom Kippur war. Neither his successes nor failures grew out of a Paulesque policy of "minding our own business."

3. Ron Paul is unserious. Suggesting that you will eliminate the IRS, the CIA, the FBI and other government agencies within weeks of taking office is ridiculous. These are bumper stickers, not serious reform proposals.

4. Ron Paul is too cozy with kooks and conspiracy theorists. As syndicated radio host Michael Medved has pointed out, Ron Paul's newspaper column was carried by the American Free Press (a parent publication of the Hitler-praising Barnes Review). Paul may not have been aware of this. But though invited by Medved to disavow any connection, Paul has so far failed to respond.

Paul has appeared on the Alex Jones radio program not once, not twice, but three times. Jones is the sort who believes that black helicopters are coming to impose a police state on America. He is quite concerned about the Bohemian Grove, the Bilderbergers, the federal election system (it's rigged, of course) and so on. Naturally, he believes that 9/11 was an inside job. Ron Paul has even appeared in a Jones film, "Endgame," the point of which is apparently that the Bilderbergers are plotting to control the world. They've already got Europe (through the European Union) and now are on the verge of securing America by means of a North American union that would unite Mexico, the United States and Canada.

Even if Paul says nothing insane in this film, his appearance alone calls his judgment into question. I have not seen "Endgame," but I have heard a tape of Paul on the Jones program just after the 2006 election. Jones asked the congressman whether the victory for the Democrats wasn't a "rejection of neo-fascist imperialism." Paul replied, "Yeah . . . This was a healthy election as far as I'm concerned."

Ron Paul is the favorite candidate of a number of racist, neo-Nazi and conspiracist websites. While Paul cannot be held accountable for the views of cranks and kooks, he can disavow their support and return their checks. He received $500 from Don Black, the proprietor of Stormfront.org and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. He has not yet returned it.

Moreover, Paul seems to be playing a sly game with his conspiracy-minded fans. He does not explicitly endorse the crazier theories out there, but he hints at dark forces in the U.S. government threatening our liberties, he inveighs against the "neo-cons" (shorthand for Jews in some circles) and he gives aid and comfort to the paranoid by appearing on their favorite radio shows.

No, Ron Paul is not my candidate. Not for president. He might make a dandy new leader for the Branch Davidians.

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party