What the Catholic Church says and reality are two opposite points on the moral compass
By their fruits ye shall know them
Six of the eight states where 50 percent or more of the public supports gay
marriage are the states with the highest proportion of Catholics, ranging from
Rhode Island at 46 percent to New York and California at 37 percent. Meanwhile,
the eight states most opposed to gay marriage include six of the seven with the
lowest proportion of Catholics, from Alabama at six percent to North Carolina
at nine percent. In other words, support for same-sex marriage is directly
related to the proportion of Catholics in a given state





Ø The Roman Catholic Church Behind All this NEVER Apologized to those Sodomized By its Priests
Ø SAT Math and Verbal Scores by Sex and Race.
Ø Two Decades of SAT Math and Verbal Scores by State.
Ø 1988 Abortion Rates by State.
Ø Deaths, Crimes, and Murder Rates by State.
Ø Original Excel Spreadsheet Which Correlates this Data
Ø Gaussian Curves of Catholics vs. Protestants
Ø Latest SAT Scores by Sex and Race for North Dakota
Ø Same Pattern Seen in PISA scores
Ø Same Pattern Seen in TIMSS scores
Ø Catholic Population by State
Ø How the Catholic Church Sodomized America
Ø Letter to Parish Priests
This HATEFUL “church” must GO!!!
• 85% of Mississippi voters amend state constitution in 2001
• 76% of Texas voters pass Proposition 2
• 71.6% of Kentucky voters amend state constitution
• 70% of Nebraska voters amend state constitution with
Initiative 416
• 69.4% of Nevada voters amend state constitution
• 68% of Alaska’s voters amend state constitution
• 66% of Hawaii legislators amend state constitution, 69% of
voters endorsed that amendment
• 61.4% of California voters pass Proposition 22 on March 7,
2000, then again 53% pass Proposition 8 in November 2009
• 57% of Oregon voters reject the National Gay and Lesbian
Task Force and amend their state constitution
• 53.4% of Colorado Voters amend state constitution on
November 3, 1993
• Oklahoman voters made it a crime for a public official to
issue gay marriage licenses
• FEDERAL DOMA law passed on September 21, 1996 ends gay
marriage
• “Voters in Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan,
Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah all
approved anti-same-sex marriage amendments by double-digit margins”, per CNN
• “Focus On the Family” reported that 35 states had already
passed DOMA laws prior to California voters passing Proposition 8 in a
landslide victory, making that 36 states
• Voters in Maine and Washington reject their legislator’s
initiatives to recognize gay marriage
• 40% of Canadian voters want to recognize gay marriage
• Seven states have laws that define marriage as a legal union
between a man and woman, deny recognition of same-sex marriages solemnized in
other states, and make same-sex marriage a violation of public policy. These
states are Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and
Missouri
• Six states define marriage as a union between a man and
woman and deny recognition of same-sex marriages solemnized in other states.
These states are Alaska, Florida, Indiana, Nebraska, South Dakota, and West
Virginia
• Four states deny recognition of same-sex marriages
solemnized in other states and make such marriages a violation of public
policy. These states are Idaho, Louisiana, Montana, and South Carolina
• Three states-Colorado, Kansas, and Tennessee-define marriage
as a legal union between a man and women and make same-sex marriage a violation
of public policy
• The 15 remaining states have laws that contain only one
provision rather than a combination of those discussed above
• Only three of the 37 DOMA states use the federal definition
of a "spouse" as a member of the opposite sex who is legally married
as husband or wife. These states are Florida, North Dakota, and Texas
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2002/olrdata/jud/rpt/2002-R-0957.htm
87% of the American Jewish Committee support gay marriage
Federal statistics reveal that across the nation, from state to state, there’s a huge difference in social pathology, with murder rates varying 6 fold, abortion rates varying 8 fold, SAT scores varying 228 points, marriage rates varying 72%, and divorce rates varying 21%. The states with the highest percentage of Catholics (i.e., Rhode Island with 59%, and Massachusetts with 43%) do very poorly in all these areas, whereas the states with the least percentage of Catholics (i.e., North Dakota with 22%, Iowa with 17%, and Utah with 8%) are at the opposite end of the spectrum.
Where you would expect Catholic states to have the lowest abortion rates because of opposition to abortion by the Catholic Church, the abortion rates in ALL of these states are the highest in the country, with the rate in New York (38% Catholic) being 8 times higher than the rate in South Dakota (20% Catholic). Where you would expect the marriage rate in Catholic states to be the highest, their rates are actually the lowest, with non-Catholic states like Utah (8.3% Catholics) having a marriage rate 73% higher than Catholic states like New York. With the putative Catholic opposition to divorce, you’d expect to see a clear and distinct difference between states in this area, but relative to the low marriage rates of the predominately Catholic states, there’s no such distinction. As a percent of the number of marriages, divorces in the most Catholic state Rhode Island (with 59% Catholics) are on par with the least Catholic state Utah (with 8% Catholics). And even here, Utah wins because their marriage rate is 48% higher than Rhode Island anyway.
A real unexpected outcome of evaluating these statistics is the much lower murder rates in ALL the least Catholic states relative to ALL the most Catholic states. For decades now, the murder rates in non-Catholic states like Vermont, Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota have been lower than 1 per 100,000 population, contrasted to rates greater than 5 in ALL these mainly Catholic states. In 1994, compared to North Dakota, the murder rate in New York was 55 TIMES higher, in Rhode Island was 20 TIMES higher, and in Massachusetts was 17 TIMES higher.
If the abortion rate of the entire nation were equivalent to South Dakota, there would be 1,256,693 fewer abortions every year. Conversely, if it were equivalent to primarily Catholic New York, there would be 944,000 MORE. If the marriage and divorce rates of the entire nation were equivalent to that of Catholic free Tennessee, there would be 832,000 MORE marriages and fewer divorces. Conversely, if it were equivalent to a Catholic state like Massachusetts, there would be 416 thousand FEWER marriages and the divorce rate would INCREASE. If the murder rate in the entire nation were equivalent to North Dakota in 1994, there would be only 560 murders annually, a reduction of 25,520 murders. Conversely, if it were equivalent to a Catholic state like New York, there would be 6,090 MORE, and if it were equivalent to Catholic-influenced Washington, DC, there would be 176,900 MORE.
If SAT scores for the entire nation were equivalent to Iowa’s score of 1,221, we’d score the highest in the world on both TIMSS and PISA. But if they were equivalent to Rhode Island’s score of 993, we’d score between Israel and Africa. If Catholics in the mostly Protestant states are not positively influenced by the higher education quality and solid moral values of the Protestants around them, and if Protestants in the mostly Catholic states are not adversely influenced by the lower education quality and abject moral depravity of the Catholics around them, then this 264 SAT point gap (93 in math, 97 in Reading, and 74 in writing) between Whites in Iowa which is 17% Catholic and whites in Rhode Island which is 60% Catholics, is FAR, FAR greater than we might ever imagine.
Ignoring for a moment the high percentage of jews in Rhode Island who skew the scores of Whites by a much larger margin than you could ever have conceived of, and ignoring that Rhode Island’s low high school graduation rate means that the lowest scoring one third of their students are not even included, simple algebra presents the following probable scenario:
X = SAT math score of Protestants
Y = SAT math score of Catholics
Rhode Island: .6Y + .4X = 519
Iowa: .17Y + .83X = 612
X = (519 - .6Y)/.4
.17Y + .83(519 - .6Y)/.4 = 612
.17Y + 1076.925 – 1.245Y = 612
1.075Y = 464.925
Y = 432.5
X = (519 - .6Y)/.4
X = (519 - .6 * 432.5)/.4
X = 648.8
So what appears to be only a 93 SAT math point gap between White Protestants and White Catholics is in reality a 216 point gap!
Whew! The same applies to writing and reading skills in the same proportion.


ALL of the Murder Capitols of the World are in the US, in CATHOLIC cities! Compared to Christians in mostly Protestant states, pagans in mostly Catholic states are six TIMES more likely to murder even though they have five TIMES as many police per capita, 8 TIMES more likely to have an abortion even though this "church" claims it opposes abortion, 21% more likely to divorce even though they are 50% less likely to marry in the first place, and have SAT scores 228 points lower even though they spend FIVE TIMES as much per student for "education", not even counting the 40% of the students in states like Delaware who aren’t included in SAT scores because they never even graduate from high school?" While the vast majority of the voters in the 35 mostly Protestant states, plus now Texas and California, have banned sodomite marriages, the mostly Catholic states, including Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Connecticut, and New York, have sugar coated this issue by calling it “gay rights” and “legalized” the abomination called “gay marriages”. The close vote in California, 52% for banning sodomy and 48% opposed, is due to the high percentage of Catholics in the state, 28.8%, demonstrating that Catholicism’s influence adversely affects twice as many of the population as their actual church membership.

|
Ranking |
Percentage of Catholics per State
population
|
State |
Number
of Catholics
|
|
1 |
59.2% |
Rhode Island |
640,274 |
|
2 |
42.7% |
Massachusetts |
4,865,216 |
|
3 |
41.1% |
New Jersey |
3,605,265 |
|
4 |
38.7% |
Connecticut |
1,357,992 |
|
5 |
37.6% |
New York |
7,433,366 |
|
6 |
29.9% |
Illinois |
3,867,102 |
|
7 |
29.4% |
Pennsylvania |
3,614,694 |
|
8 |
29.2% |
Texas |
6,742,690 |
|
9 |
29.0% |
Wisconsin |
1,605,155 |
|
10 |
28.8% |
California |
10,906,992 |
|
11 |
27.7% |
Nevada |
661,300 |
|
12 |
26.1% |
Louisiana - 2005 total |
816,260 |
|
13 |
24.0% |
New Hampshire |
314,471 |
|
14 |
22.2% |
North Dakota |
145,789 |
|
15 |
21.9% |
Washington, D.C. |
575,824 |
|
16 |
21.5% |
Minnesota |
1,093,533 |
|
17 |
21.4% |
New Mexico |
494,449 |
|
18 |
21.4% |
Nebraska |
375,808 |
|
19 |
20.5% |
Michigan |
2,064,103 |
|
20 |
20.5% |
South Dakota |
154,435 |
|
21 |
19.0% |
Vermont |
118,000 |
|
22 |
18.5% |
Ohio |
2,128,619 |
|
23 |
18.3% |
Delaware |
230,000 |
|
24 |
17.1% |
Iowa |
494,698 |
|
25 |
16.9% |
Maryland |
517,679 |
|
26 |
15.7% |
Arizona |
908,123 |
|
27 |
15.1% |
Kansas |
406,916 |
|
28 |
15.1% |
Maine |
193,228 |
|
29 |
14.7% |
Missouri |
835,581 |
|
30 |
14.7% |
Colorado |
666,213 |
|
31 |
12.7% |
Florida |
2,265,450 |
|
32 |
12.3% |
Indiana |
767,349 |
|
33 |
12.1% |
Oregon |
432,170 |
|
34 |
12.1% |
Montana |
110,409 |
|
35 |
12.0% |
Washington State |
745,614 |
|
36 |
11.3% |
Hawaii |
143,240 |
|
37 |
10.4% |
Idaho |
148,100 |
|
38 |
9.7% |
Kentucky |
387,062 |
|
39 |
9.7% |
Wyoming |
49,121 |
|
40 |
8.7% |
Alaska |
55,643 |
|
41 |
8.3% |
Utah |
200,000 |
|
42 |
8.1% |
Virginia |
620,399 |
|
43 |
5.1% |
Georgia |
441,749 |
|
44 |
4.6% |
Oklahoma |
160,878 |
|
45 |
4.6% |
West Virginia |
82,749 |
|
46 |
4.0% |
Mississippi |
117,942 |
|
47 |
3.9% |
North Carolina |
336,738 |
|
48 |
3.9% |
Arkansas |
107,524 |
|
49 |
3.7% |
South Carolina |
157,450 |
|
50 |
3.4% |
Alabama |
153,939 |
|
51 |
3.2% |
Tennessee |
190,684 |




The reason Rhode Island scores 228 SAT points lower than Iowa can’t be completely explained by race (a higher percentage of “minorities”), because SAT scores for Whites in Iowa are 192 points higher than for “whites” in Rhode Island. It can’t be due to lack of education spending, because Rhode Island spends three times MORE per student for education than Iowa.
http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/North_Dakota_CBS_08.pdf
|
Rhode Island |
New York |
Mass |
Iowa |
North Dakota |
|
|
SAT reading total |
495 |
491 |
514 |
608 |
594 |
|
SAT math total |
498 |
508 |
525 |
613 |
604 |
|
SAT reading Whites |
516 |
520 |
529 |
614 |
607 |
|
SAT math Whites |
519 |
533 |
537 |
613 |
610 |
|
|
|||||
|
SAT SCORES MINUS 480 |
Rhode Island |
New York |
Mass |
Iowa |
North Dakota |
|
SAT reading total |
15 |
11 |
34 |
128 |
114 |
|
SAT math total |
18 |
28 |
45 |
133 |
124 |
|
SAT reading Whites |
36 |
40 |
49 |
134 |
127 |
|
SAT math Whites |
39 |
53 |
57 |
133 |
130 |
The following tables were created without taking into consideration the argument that the only reason for the hundreds of points gaps in SAT scores between mostly Catholic states and mostly Protestant states is that the percent of students who take the test varies from 4% in the highest scoring states to 81% in the lowest scoring states. While this is partially true, it is not the complete answer. For example, eight states, Texas, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Maryland, Hawaii, Nevada, and West Virginia, all score within 10 points of each other (between 474 and 484), yet the percent who took the SAT test varied from 17% in West Virginia to 80% or more in Connecticut and Massachusetts. And the spread in SAT scores of the 6 states where less than 6% take the test was from 523 to 592, or 69 points, almost a full standard deviation.
So there are significant differences between the academic skills of states which cannot be explained by different levels of test taking, or different percentages of students who take SAT.
Why would WHITES in Rhode Island, 70% of whose students take SAT, score only 519 in SAT math while WHITES in Connecticut, 81% of whose students take SAT, score 14 points higher, or 533. And why would they score 13 points lower in SAT verbal (516 vs. 529)? What else can explain it other than the difference in the way Catholic and Protestant schools teach their students—OR a difference in the quality of the students in the first place?
Ignoring for a moment that SAT scores DO correlate inversely state by state with the percent of students who take the test, the only way the 81% of Connecticut’s students who take the test could have scored 13-14 points higher than the 71% of the Rhode Island students who take the test is if Protestants score significantly higher than Catholics:
|
Math |
Verbal |
||
|
Protestants |
559.0 |
554.0 |
|
|
Catholics |
491.8 |
489.4 |
|
|
67.2 |
64.6 |
131.8 |
If we were to take into account that Whites in Rhode Island SHOULD have scored higher than Whites in Connecticut because only 70% of the students there take SAT, compared to 81% in Connecticut, this gap between White Catholics and White Protestants would have been even bigger than 132 SAT points, consistent with the huge gap between White Catholics and White Protestants illustrated at age 13 in NAEP math scores. (286 for North Dakots vs. 275 for Rhode Island, a difference of 5 IQ points at the 8th grade level).
Voila!
Since SAT scores DO decrease by 1.8 points for each 1% increase in the percent of test takers in the state, Rhode Island SHOULD have scored 20 points HIGHER than Connecticut in both SAT verbal and math, rather than 13 and 14 points lower, which means the REAL gap between the states is 33 SAT verbal points and 34 SAT math points. And the only way to explain this is if the SAT point gap between Catholics and Protestants is 328 points rather than “only” 132 points:
|
Math |
Verbal |
||
|
Protestants |
618.0 |
611.0 |
|
|
Catholics |
450.0 |
450.8 |
|
|
168.0 |
160.2 |
328.2 |




There
are too many notable exceptions to the rule (that SAT scores increase
strictly as a result of the decrease in the percent of high school students
taking the test) to rely too heavily on this rule. A simple correlation
of the scores with the percent of test takers indicates that this is about 10,
to a maximum of 20, percent of the reason for the wide variation in scores (240
SAT points, from 867 in DC to 1107 in North Dakota) from state to state.
The
smallest percent of students taking the test, 4%, is in Utah and Mississippi,
but their scores are nowhere close to similar--there's a difference just
between these two states of 23 points in SAT math and 17 points in SAT verbal.
More than twice as many students, 9%, take the test in
Minnesota, but they score 39 points higher than Mississippi in math and 10
points higher in verbal. 12% of the students in Tennessee take the test, yet
they score higher in both verbal and math than Mississippi. Clearly
there's something more at work here than simply a difference in the number of
students taking the test.
The
same notable exceptions hold true in the states where the highest percentage of
students take the test. Maine's low SAT math score of 469 and verbal
score of 427 has been blamed on the fact that 68% of their students take the
test. But 80% of Massachusetts' students take the test and they
score 8 and 3 points higher, respectively. And 70% of New Hampshire's students
take the test and score 22 and 17 points higher respectively. 74% of New
York's students take the test and, even though they DO score 8 points lower
than Maine in verbal, they score 4 points higher in
math. Only 53% of DC's students take the test so they ought to score
HIGHER than the above states, but they score LOWER than Maine, 24 in math and
15 in verbal. Similarly, 51% of the students in Oregon take the test, but
they score 54 points higher in math and 36 points higher in verbal than
students in DC where a similar percentage of students take the test.
This
is not to say that there is NO correlation between the percent of test takers
in a state and their average SAT scores, just that it's a relatively minor
factor relative to others (education spending, environment, race, health, tax
rate, types of teachers, amount of central government control, attitude,
genetics, and religion, to name a few).
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0005099.html
|
Number of abortions |
Abortion occurrence rate1 |
|||||
|
State |
1996 |
1992 |
1988 |
1996 |
1992 |
1988 |
|
Alabama |
13,826 |
17,450 |
18,220 |
14 |
18.2 |
18.7 |
|
Alaska |
2,139 |
2,370 |
2,390 |
15 |
16.5 |
18.2 |
|
Arizona |
11,016 |
20,600 |
23,070 |
11 |
24.1 |
28.8 |
|
Arkansas |
5,882 |
7,130 |
6,250 |
11 |
13.5 |
11.6 |
|
California |
280,1802 |
304,230 |
311,720 |
39 |
42.1 |
45.9 |
|
Colorado |
9,710 |
19,880 |
18,740 |
11 |
23.6 |
22.4 |
|
Connecticut |
14,094 |
19,720 |
23,630 |
20 |
26.2 |
31.2 |
|
Delaware |
4,482 |
5,730 |
5,710 |
26 |
35.2 |
35.7 |
|
District of Columbia |
13,674 |
21,320 |
26,120 |
(3) |
138.4 |
163.3 |
|
Florida |
80,040 |
84,680 |
82,850 |
27 |
30.0 |
31.5 |
|
Georgia |
35,790 |
39,680 |
36,720 |
20 |
24.0 |
23.5 |
|
Hawaii |
4,916 |
12,190 |
11,170 |
19 |
46.0 |
43.0 |
|
Idaho |
1,022 |
1,710 |
1,920 |
4 |
7.2 |
8.2 |
|
Illinois |
53,613 |
68,420 |
72,570 |
20 |
25.4 |
26.4 |
|
Indiana |
13,341 |
15,840 |
15,760 |
10 |
12.0 |
11.9 |
|
Iowa |
7,6024 |
6,970 |
9,420 |
12 |
11.4 |
14.6 |
|
Kansas |
10,685 |
12,570 |
11,440 |
19 |
22.4 |
20.1 |
|
Kentucky |
7,000 |
10,000 |
11,520 |
8 |
11.4 |
13.0 |
|
Louisiana |
11,865 |
13,600 |
17,340 |
12 |
13.4 |
16.3 |
|
Maine |
2,615 |
4,200 |
4,620 |
9 |
14.7 |
16.2 |
|
Maryland |
12,363 |
31,260 |
32,670 |
10 |
26.4 |
28.6 |
|
Massachusetts |
29,293 |
40,660 |
43,720 |
21 |
28.4 |
30.2 |
|
Michigan |
30,208 |
55,580 |
63,410 |
14 |
25.2 |
28.5 |
|
Minnesota |
14,193 |
16,180 |
18,580 |
13 |
15.6 |
18.2 |
|
Mississippi |
4,206 |
7,550 |
5,120 |
7 |
12.4 |
8.4 |
|
Missouri |
11,629 |
13,510 |
19,490 |
10 |
11.6 |
16.4 |
|
Montana |
2,763 |
3,330 |
3,050 |
15 |
18.2 |
16.5 |
|
Nebraska |
5,214 |
5,580 |
6,490 |
14 |
15.7 |
17.7 |
|
Nevada |
6,965 |
13,300 |
10,190 |
20 |
44.2 |
40.3 |
|
New Hampshire |
2,3004 |
3,890 |
4,710 |
8 |
14.6 |
17.5 |
|
New Jersey |
31,860 |
55,320 |
63,900 |
18 |
31.0 |
35.1 |
|
New Mexico |
5,033 |
6,410 |
6,810 |
13 |
17.7 |
19.1 |
|
New York |
152,991 |
195,390 |
183,980 |
37 |
46.2 |
43.3 |
|
North Carolina |
33,554 |
36,180 |
39,720 |
20 |
22.4 |
25.4 |
|
North Dakota |
1,291 |
1,490 |
2,230 |
9 |
10.7 |
14.9 |
|
Ohio |
36,530 |
49,520 |
53,400 |
15 |
19.5 |
21.0 |
|
Oklahoma |
6,7694 |
8,940 |
12,120 |
10 |
12.5 |
16.2 |
|
Oregon |
13,767 |
16,060 |
15,960 |
20 |
23.9 |
23.9 |
|
Pennsylvania |
38,004 |
49,740 |
51,830 |
15 |
18.6 |
18.9 |
|
Rhode Island |
5,437 |
6,990 |
7,190 |
24 |
30.0 |
30.6 |
|
South Carolina |
9,326 |
12,190 |
14,160 |
11 |
14.2 |
16.7 |
|
South Dakota |
901 |
1,040 |
900 |
6 |
6.8 |
5.7 |
|
Tennessee |
17,989 |
19,060 |
22,090 |
15 |
16.2 |
18.9 |
|
Texas |
91,470 |
97,400 |
100,690 |
21 |
23.1 |
24.8 |
|
Utah |
3,639 |
3,940 |
5,030 |
8 |
9.3 |
12.8 |
|
Vermont |
2,139 |
2,900 |
3,580 |
16 |
21.2 |
25.8 |
|
Virginia |
25,770 |
35,020 |
35,420 |
16 |
22.7 |
23.7 |
|
Washington |
26,138 |
33,190 |
31,220 |
21 |
27.7 |
27.6 |
|
West Virginia |
2,470 |
3,140 |
3,270 |
6 |
7.7 |
7.5 |
|
Wisconsin |
13,673 |
15,450 |
18,040 |
12 |
13.6 |
16.0 |
|
Wyoming |
208 |
460 |
600 |
2 |
4.3 |
5.1 |
|
Total |
1,221,585 |
1,528,930 |
1,590,750 |
20 |
25.9 |
27.3 |

o



Let’s not take the extreme examples
like Rhode Island and Utah who are the most Catholic and least
Catholic states, and on the opposite ends of the scale on abortion rates,
but instead compare this data for Massachusetts which is 43% Catholic and has
an abortion rate of 30.6 to that for Montana which is 12% Catholic and has an
abortion rate about half of that, or 16.5.
IF religion is the ONLY factor, THEN
we can determine just what it is about Catholic states that they have such a
high abortion rate using some relatively simple algebra:
X = abortion rate of Catholics
Y = abortion rate of Protestants
.43X + .57Y = 30.6
.12X + .88Y = 16.5
Y =(30.6 -
.43X)/.57
.12X + .88(30.6 - .43X)/.57 = 16.5
.12X + 47.24 - 0.6639X = 16.5
0.5439X = 30.74
X = 56.5
Y = (30.6 - .43X)/.57 =(30.6 - .43 * 56.5)/.57 = 11.0
What this tells us is that
Catholics are almost SIX TIMES more likely than Protestants to have
abortions, that if there were no Catholics in Montana they would have an abortion
rate of 11.0 (one third less than it is today), and that if there were no
Protestants in Massachusetts they would have an abortion rate of 56.5, almost
double what it actually is.
And what this tells us is that
Catholics would self-destruct if there weren't Protestants around to coddle,
help, subsidize them and manage their affairs for them. Such an abortion
rate, coupled with their low pregnancy rate, would mean the end of their
race in a hurry [hallelujah!].
But what exactly is it about this chosen race that
they think we owe them so much? This hints that all of our social pathologies
can be traced back to THEM rather than the jews, so I would say we owe them nothing but a sharp
stick in the eye.
[Several of the above charts were
based on false information that Illinois is one of the most Catholic
states. Once the correct information is
entered, namely that only 29% of Illinois residents are Catholics, correlation
reaches a much higher level in all aspects, highlighting the role of the
Catholic Church in all manner of social pathology in this country]
|
State |
Catholics % State population |
Murder per 100k |
Abortions per 1,000 women age 15-44 1988 |
Marriages per 1,000 population |
Per Capita Health Care Cost |
||||
|
Rhode Island |
0.59 |
3 |
30.6 |
7 |
6,193 |
72.3 |
6.5 |
295.6 |
336 |
|
Massachusetts |
0.43 |
3 |
30.2 |
6.1 |
6,683 |
72.1 |
5.2 |
285.7 |
279 |
|
New Jersey |
0.41 |
5 |
35.1 |
5 |
5,807 |
84.5 |
5.2 |
299.7 |
283 |
|
Connecticut |
0.39 |
3 |
31.2 |
5.5 |
6,344 |
79.3 |
5.8 |
264.9 |
296 |
|
New York |
0.38 |
5 |
43.3 |
7 |
6,535 |
62.5 |
5.8 |
274.7 |
166 |
|
Pennsylvania |
0.29 |
6 |
18.9 |
4.7 |
5,933 |
79.1 |
7.3 |
290.9 |
237 |
|
Texas |
0.29 |
6 |
24.8 |
7.4 |
4,601 |
66.8 |
6.6 |
284.2 |
406 |
|
Illinois |
0.30 |
6 |
26.4 |
5.8 |
5,293 |
76.3 |
7.4 |
292.8 |
293 |
|
New Hampshire |
0.24 |
1 |
17.5 |
7.3 |
5,432 |
77.7 |
5.3 |
284.6 |
108 |
|
North Dakota |
0.22 |
1 |
14.9 |
6.5 |
5,808 |
83.1 |
6 |
257 |
159 |
|
South Dakota |
0.21 |
1 |
5.7 |
8.3 |
5,327 |
74.5 |
7.2 |
233.1 |
92 |
|
Iowa |
0.17 |
1 |
14.6 |
6.9 |
5,380 |
82.5 |
5.3 |
248.8 |
168 |
|
Maine |
0.15 |
1 |
16.2 |
7.9 |
6,540 |
74 |
6.9 |
300.7 |
101 |
|
Montana |
0.12 |
2 |
16.5 |
7.3 |
5,080 |
75.8 |
7 |
250.5 |
185 |
|
Utah |
0.08 |
1 |
12.8 |
8.6 |
3,972 |
76.7 |
4.5 |
192.9 |
325 |
|
State |
Catholics As % of
State Population |
Murder per 100k |
Abortions per 1,000 women age 15-44 1988 |
NAEP Math Score for Whites |
SAT Math 1994 |
Amount by Which SAT Score Is Higher Than 400 pts |
Marriages per 1,000 Population |
Divorce as Percent of Marriages |
|
Rhode Island |
59.20% |
3 |
30.6 |
275 |
463 |
63 |
7 |
41.3 |
|
Massachusetts |
42.70% |
3 |
30.2 |
283 |
477 |
77 |
6.1 |
36.6 |
|
New Jersey |
41.10% |
5 |
35.1 |
478 |
78 |
5 |
57.6 |
|
|
Connecticut |
38.70% |
3 |
31.2 |
288 |
477 |
77 |
5.5 |
49 |
|
New York |
37.60% |
5 |
43.3 |
283 |
473 |
73 |
7 |
39.5 |
|
Illinois |
29.91% |
6 |
26.4 |
560 |
160 |
5.8 |
43.7 |
|
|
Pennsylvania |
29.40% |
6 |
18.9 |
461 |
61 |
4.7 |
49.8 |
|
|
Texas |
29.20% |
6 |
24.8 |
285 |
474 |
74 |
7.4 |
43.7 |
|
New Hampshire |
24.00% |
1 |
17.5 |
491 |
91 |
7.3 |
46.3 |
|
|
North Dakota |
22.20% |
1 |
14.9 |
286 |
592 |
192 |
6.5 |
36.6 |
|
South Dakota |
20.50% |
1 |
5.7 |
563 |
163 |
8.3 |
36.9 |
|
|
Iowa |
17.10% |
1 |
14.6 |
285 |
583 |
183 |
6.9 |
39.7 |
|
Maine |
15.10% |
1 |
16.2 |
285 |
469 |
69 |
7.9 |
44.8 |
|
Montana |
12.10% |
2 |
16.5 |
287 |
536 |
136 |
7.3 |
51.5 |
|
Utah |
8.30% |
1 |
12.8 |
279 |
563 |
163 |
8.6 |
46.7 |
|
State |
Catholics % State population |
SAT less 400 pts |
Marriages per 1,000 population |
Divorce as percent marriage |
Incarceration Rate Blacks |
||||
|
Illinois |
30% |
|
560 |
160 |
5.8 |
43.7 |
8656 |
223 |
2,020 |
|
Rhode Island |
59% |
275 |
463 |
63 |
7 |
41.3 |
9903 |
191 |
1,838 |
|
Massachusetts |
43% |
283 |
477 |
77 |
6.1 |
36.6 |
10693 |
201 |
1,635 |
|
New Jersey |
41% |
|
478 |
78 |
5 |
57.6 |
12981 |
190 |
2,352 |
|
Connecticut |
39% |
288 |
477 |
77 |
5.5 |
49 |
10788 |
211 |
2,532 |
|
New York |
38% |
283 |
473 |
73 |
7 |
39.5 |
12930 |
174 |
1,627 |
|
Pennsylvania |
29% |
|
461 |
61 |
4.7 |
49.8 |
9979 |
305 |
2,792 |
|
Texas |
29% |
285 |
474 |
74 |
7.4 |
43.7 |
7104 |
667 |
3,162 |
|
New Hampshire |
24% |
|
491 |
91 |
7.3 |
46.3 |
8860 |
289 |
2,666 |
|
North Dakota |
22% |
286 |
592 |
192 |
6.5 |
36.6 |
7727 |
267 |
2,683 |
|
South Dakota |
21% |
|
563 |
163 |
8.3 |
36.9 |
6949 |
470 |
4,710 |
|
Iowa |
17% |
285 |
583 |
183 |
6.9 |
39.7 |
7631 |
309 |
4,200 |
|
Maine |
15% |
285 |
469 |
69 |
7.9 |
44.8 |
9534 |
262 |
1,992 |
|
Montana |
12% |
287 |
536 |
136 |
7.3 |
51.5 |
7331 |
433 |
3,569 |
|
Utah |
8% |
279 |
563 |
163 |
8.6 |
46.7 |
5008 |
392 |
3,588 |
This author would not ordinarily anticipate that an increase in the incarceration rate would result in a decrease in crime, except for the fact that a decrease in the incarceration rates for both Whites and Blacks results in an INCREASE in crime rates from state to state.






Excel spreadsheet


The following are highlights from the above murder statistics for 1994 showing vividly the difference between Catholic and non-Catholic states, cities, and countries.




Even the National Assessment of Education Progress, or NAEP, shows a huge 21 point gap in math scores between all the Catholic states and all the mostly Protestant states, a 12 IQ point gap as early as 13 years of age.
There is no other way to explain why 13 year olds in Montana which is only 12% Catholics would score 12 NAEP math points higher than 13 year olds in Rhode Island which is 59% Catholic, other than that Protestants score much higher than Catholics, namely 27 NAEP math points higher. Obviously this difference is MUCH greater by the 12th grade, just as it is in TIMSS.
|
NAEP Math |
|
|
Protestants |
290.3 |
|
Catholics |
263.0 |
|
Difference |
27.3 |
If we compare Rhode Island to North Dakota, then the difference between 8th Grade White Protestants and 8th Grade White Catholics must be more in the range of 32 points rather than only 27 points. No wonder NAEP won’t release the 12th Grade scores for Whites on a state to state basis.
|
NAEP Math |
|
|
Protestants |
293.0 |
|
Catholics |
261.2 |
|
Difference |
31.8 |

The Netherlands which is only 30% Catholic scored the highest (564), and Brazil which is 75% Catholic scored the lowest (378)




With Washington, DC, being the only “state” which has spent even more per student for “education” [which in reality is welfare dressed up in sheep’s clothing] than New York and New Jersey, it would be expected that blacks in DC, who constituted as much as 81% of the population as of late, would score higher than blacks elsewhere. INSTEAD, they scored 5 points lower than blacks nationwide in NAEP Math, and even lower than blacks in Mozambique who spend almost NOTHING for education.



|
Rank |
State |
Graduation
Rate |
|
43 |
Alabama |
60.7 |
|
39 |
Alaska |
63.6 |
|
31 |
Arizona |
70.0 |
|
28 |
Arkansas |
71.8 |
|
29 |
California |
71.0 |
|
25 |
Colorado |
72.5 |
|
6 |
Connecticut |
79.3 |
|
44 |
Delaware |
60.7 |
|
46 |
District of Columbia |
58.9 |
|
47 |
Florida |
57.5 |
|
49 |
Georgia |
56.3 |
|
38 |
Hawaii |
63.7 |
|
9 |
Idaho |
77.8 |
|
14 |
Illinois |
76.3 |
|
23 |
Indiana |
73.0 |
|
3 |
Iowa |
82.5 |
|
16 |
Kansas |
75.0 |
|
32 |
Kentucky |
69.7 |
|
45 |
Louisiana |
60.6 |
|
21 |
Maine |
74.0 |
|
20 |
Maryland |
74.4 |
|
27 |
Massachusetts |
72.1 |
|
36 |
Michigan |
66.4 |
|
8 |
Minnesota |
79.0 |
|
42 |
Mississippi |
60.8 |
|
18 |
Missouri |
74.7 |
|
15 |
Montana |
75.8 |
|
10 |
Nebraska |
77.8 |
|
50 |
Nevada |
55.9 |
|
11 |
New Hampshire |
77.7 |
|
1 |
New Jersey |
84.5 |
|
48 |
New Mexico |
56.7 |
|
40 |
New York |
62.5 |
|
37 |
North Carolina |
66.2 |
|
2 |
North Dakota |
83.1 |
|
13 |
Ohio |
76.5 |
|
30 |
Oklahoma |
71.0 |
|
33 |
Oregon |
69.0 |
|
7 |
Pennsylvania |
79.1 |
|
26 |
Rhode Island |
72.3 |
|
51 |
South Carolina |
52.5 |
|
19 |
South Dakota |
74.5 |
|
41 |
Tennessee |
62.2 |
|
35 |
Texas |
66.8 |
|
12 |
Utah |
76.7 |
|
4 |
Vermont |
81.2 |
|
17 |
Virginia |
74.9 |
|
34 |
Washington |
68.2 |
|
24 |
West Virginia |
72.8 |
|
5 |
Wisconsin |
80.6 |
|
22 |
Wyoming |
74.0 |
|
U.S. |
69.6 |
To download this data in
Microsoft Excel format, click here.
Click here to go back to the SSTI Weekly
Digest for this table.
Highest percentage of Catholics per state population.