The Biggest, Most Inviduous Feminist Lie of All Time
shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth
I had an interesting chat with women's aid[WA]. I
only spent about 5 minutes on the phone but got an absolute wealth of information. I
pretended to be a brother of a woman who was suffering domestic violence at the hands of
her boyfriend. I told the woman that my sister was worried about being a FDA[ getting the
right to all the nice, free, houses] if she moved into woman's aid. The woman laughed and
told me that that wasn't a problem and that her rights would be better if she moved in
with them because she would still be FDA but now she would have WA's help also. Then I
asked her, but what about the child, I said that my sister was worried that he would get
the child. She said that's not a problem, just to bring the child along and they would
help her apply for residence. She also said that benefits wouldn't be a problem, which
definitely is true..
One out of three women lie about paternity
From the Sunday Times 2000-06-11: "More than 250,000 tests a year are now conducted in America, and about 15,000 in Britain.... roughly 30% of men taking the tests discover that they are not the fathers of the children they regarded as their own. In the wider community, social scientists say up to 1 in 20 children are not the offspring of the man who believes himself to be their father".
one out of five women lie about paternity
QUOTE: Figures released by the agency after a freedom of information request reveal that since 1998 3,034 men have been found to have been falsely accused by women of being the father out of 15,909 who have taken the test
skitt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: Child Support Agency forced to pay back wrongly accused men
David Hencke, Westminster correspondent Monday November 28, 2005 The Guardian - http://www.guardian.co.uk/child/story/0,7369,1652379,00.html The Child Support Agency has had to refund hundreds of thousands of pounds in maintenance payments to more than 3,000 men after DNA tests revealed that they had been wrongly named by mothers in paternity suits. One in six men who took a DNA test to challenge claims by women that they were the fathers of their children were cleared by the results, according to official figures disclosed by the agency. Under CSA rules, men must start paying maintenance the moment they are named by mothers as the father of the child. They can challenge the ruling by asking for a DNA test but have to pay for it themselves. Figures released by the agency after a freedom of information request reveal that since 1998 3,034 men have been found to have been falsely accused by women of being the father out of 15,909 who have taken the test. The CSA has not recovered money from any of the mothers. Refunds to the wrongly accused men have come from the taxpayer. Frank Field, former social security minister and Labour MP for Birkenhead, said yesterday: "The situation in the CSA is getting so absurd that even Lewis Carroll would have rejected it as a script for Alice in Wonderland." The revelation comes as the agency faces yet another government review, ordered by Tony Blair. Last week it emerged that the agency had failed five of the seven performance targets set by ministers, has a backlog of 350,000 cases and is still chasing 100,000 fathers who will not pay maintenance. It has also failed to register 150,000 fathers on benefit who fail to pay any money - because it cannot get the information from Jobcentre Plus. Concerns were raised by Mr Blair again in an interview with the Sunday Live programme on Sky News yesterday. Emphasising his determination to reform the agency, he said there were "basic design problems" that needed to be addressed. "We inherited this system, we made changes to it that have undoubtedly simplified it, but even though I made those changes seven years ago, I think I'm right in saying that over half the cases of the CSA are still under the old system," said Mr Blair. "There has got to be a change, because otherwise if you are not careful, you end up spending more and more money." Under a deal negotiated with Cellmark, which provides DNA tests for the CSA, men who agree to pay for a test in advance pay �194.13. It goes up to �257.58 if they pay for it afterwards. The normal commercial charge is �495. Fathers who are cleared of paternity receive a refund for the DNA test and all maintenance they
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On
Behalf Of Ken Wiggins
To all involved.
What I find interesting is my now ex- used (effectively) the exact the same statement in open court: "...if he doesn't have money his family does." First of all, not true; secondly, huh??? Ironically, my argument was and remains that she was allowed to conceal her assets, despite California being a community property state, but I suffered from imputed income.
Dead Beat Moms
Mothers are 1/6th as likely as fathers to be ordered to pay "child support", pay an average amount of "child support" only two thirds of what fathers pay, are twice as likely as fathers to fail to pay anything at all, and make less than 4% of total child support payments due. Mothers are 14 times as likely as fathers, mothers without husbands present are 7 times more likely than married mothers, and black mothers are 5 times more likely than White mothers, to receive AFDC. More than half of mothers who receive food stamps are separated or never married and have 10% more children per household than married families. Women as a group receive $98 billion more back from the IRS in tax credits than they pay in taxes and half of women-owned firms have annual receipts of less than $10,000 with average receipts one fourth of men-owned firms, making Small Business Administration loans another hidden source of welfare for mothers.
Even after all these social transfer payments, four out of five mothers receiving AFDC still live below the poverty level compared to only one out of eight mothers who don't receive AFDC and female householders are still five times more likely to live in poverty than married couples.
Government makes a lousy husband and father
Dead Beat GOVERNMENT
The Biggest Feminist Lie
The biggest feminist lie of all times, misleadingly referred to by feminists as "child support", is killing children--lots of them--and the feminists could care less. The promise of "child support" is a huge financial incentive to many mothers, sometimes providing "incomes" more than three to ten times greater than if they competed in the labor force. Thus eight out of ten divorces are filed by women, greatly increasing divorce and giving the US the distinction of having achieved and sustained the world's highest divorce rate, bar none, for several decades now. Anti-male judicial bias by courts places more than nine out of ten of these children of divorce into the custody of their mothers, precisely where the government knows from the NIS-3 Study that they are more than three times more likely to be fatally abused [read: murdered]. This factor alone kills thirty times as many children as the most wildly successful gun control laws could ever hope to save from guns.
"Child Support" Increases Child Abuse
NIS-3 shows that women are responsible for four out of five fatal child abuse cases. The majority of the male perpetrators are step-fathers, boyfriends, and strangers, leaving women responsible for thirty two times as many fatal child abuse cases as biological fathers. Yet fatal child abuse is only one ninth of the total increase in homicide rates of fatherless children, and the increase in total homicides is only one seventh of the total increase in overall mortality rates due to divorce.
There is only one thing that enables so many children to be removed from the safest environment possible, their biological fathers, to be killed in such record numbers--the payment of "child support".
Seventy two thousand lives/year would be saved if American fathers didn't pay "child support"
Before this money grab by feminists was called "child support", it was called "alimony". And before fathers were financially penalized for the privilege of having their children removed from them, less than six percent of the nation's children lived in fatherless households. Women entered law and became the majority voter in the 1960s, "child support" was created, and two out of five of our nation's children will be sleeping in a fatherless household tonight. Had this rate of fatherlessness not increased [read: had American fathers not consented to paying "child support"] there would be twenty three million fewer fatherless children now. Because fatherless children have a forty percent higher premature mortality rate than children raised in families, independent of the fact that children of divorce are more likely to divorce themselves, seventy two thousand of these twenty three million fatherless children will die prematurely each year, year after year.
Each year, 4,252 will die from circulatory disease, 4,712 will die from cancer, 10,075 will die from respiratory disease, 5,593 will die from diabetes, 7,853 will die from accidents, 10,764 will commit suicide, 9,615 will be murdered, 11,645 will die from cirrhosis, and 7,163 will die from a combination of other causes. Over the next 30 years, ten percent of these twenty three million fatherless children will have died PREMATURELY due to all causes of death.
Total nationwide "child support" collections are now $12 billion per year. The statistical data shows the undisputed correlation that for each $522 in "child support" collected, one additional fatherless child dies prematurely. The causal link is abundantly documented in the "One Page Stories of the Signatories to the Fathers' Manifesto"
Societal costs and losses would be $571 billion/year less if American fathers didn't pay "child support"
Total "child support" collections in the US are $12 billion per year. The administrative costs of collecting it are $3.3 billion, leaving "net child support collected" of $8.7 billion. Of 1.8 million Criminal Justice System employees, 630,000 are directly involved in some aspect of "child support" collections--divorce, custody hearings, incarceration, police, judges, courts, clerks, jailers, prison employees, etc., at an annual cost of $63 billion. It is conservatively estimated that the negative economic incentive to twenty million fathers paying "child support" reduces their average incomes of $43,000 by twenty five percent, which reduces GDP by $215 billion. Total government costs are forty two cents of each wage, so this $215 billion reduction in GDP reduces tax collections by $90 billion. The legal fees, counsellors, psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and other costs paid directly by fathers is estimated by Bill Harrington, US Commissioner on Families, to be $200 billion per year.
The total real costs and losses resulting directly from "child support" collections are $571 billion per year, which is sixty six times greater than the actual amount of "net child support collected" each year. Just the Criminal Justice System costs exceed "net child support collected" by seven times, productivity losses exceed it by twenty four times, loss in tax revenues exceeds it by ten times, and divorce fees and costs exceed it by twenty three times.