Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

 
Feminists have convinced some of us that “equal protection” was always meant to apply to women, or even that it is the reason the Constitution exists.  With this assumption behind them, Patricia Ireland now says:
 Many Christian pastors and activists think the gospel's
 message is that women and men are equal in the sight of God, that
 women should exercise God-given free will over our own lives and that
 none of us needs the Promise Keepers's high priests pressing their
 fundamentalist political agenda.
This is a bald faced lie and Patricia Ireland will never find a single scripture in the Bible to support that statement.  The Bible describes a workable family structure with the father as the head of the family, and Patricia Ireland the homosexual stands for just the opposite.  If she continues to misquote Biblical scripture, what makes her so sure we won’t ultimately apply it properly in dealing with her?

The Fourteenth Amendment which contains the phrase “equal protection” was ratified in 1868--almost 130 years ago--with the intent of giving newly freed slaves citizenship and not to undermine family structure by providing women “equal protection”.  The Fifteenth Amendment  was ratified in 1870 and gave slaves but not women the vote.  If either amendment was meant to apply to women, either would have specifically stated so (and they probably would not have been ratified), but neither one did and women did not have the vote nor did the term “equal protection” apply to women at the time these amendments were ratified.  People at the time were very sensitive about the role of women described in the Bible which was protected under the First Amendment right to “free exercise [of religion]”.

THE COURT HELD IN THE 1874 TERM THAT A STATE COULD CONSTITUTIONALLY RESTRICT THE FRANCHISE TO MEN.  WHILE THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS RELIED UPON, THE THRUST OF THE OPINION WAS DIRECTED AT THE PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES CLAUSE WITH A SUBSIDIARY REFERENCE TO THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE, MINOR V. HAPPERSETT, 21 WALL.  162.
This ruling makes it clear that the “equal protection” clause did not apply to women after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment and at least until  ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment.  But even the Ninteenth Amendment which gave women the right to vote in 1920 did not apply the term “equal protection” to women: WHEN THE NINETEENTH AMENDMENT WAS RATIFIED GIVING WOMEN THE RIGHT TO VOTE, IT WAS ASSUMED BY MOST CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERTS THAT THERE WAS NO RELIEF BY WAY OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE OF THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, Justice Douglass, Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 US 112 (Dec. 21, 1970)
Thus it is clear that even giving women the right to vote in 1920 still did not apply the term “equal protection” to women.  To do so would have undermined one of the most important tenets of the religions of 86% of North Americans--establishment of the father as the head of the family.  It would have violated the spirit and intent of those who ratified the Fourteenth Amendment.  It would have broken with 130 years of Constitutional tradition.  And now we know--it would have caused social chaos: IT WAS MUCH LATER, INDEEDNOT UNTIL THE 1961 TERM-- NEARLY A
CENTURY AFTER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT WAS ADOPTED-- THAT DISCRIMINATION AGAINST VOTERS ON GROUNDS OTHER THAN RACE WAS STRUCK DOWN, Justice Douglass, Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 US 112 (Dec. 21, 1970).
AND NOW YOU KNOW, GENTLEMEN.  Without a mandate from “we the people”, without the required Constitutional amendment, without regard to the very important precepts of the First Amendment right to “free exercise [of religion]”, contrary to 161 years of Constitutional tradition, and quixotically reversing 93 years of consistent support of the spirit and intent of “we the people” through the Fourteenth Amendment, these judicial activists suddenly changed courses on us, and created social havoc in the process:
 

Since the 1960s:

The divorce rate more than doubled.
The murder rate tripled while the solution rate for murders declined from 92% to 63%.
The value of the dollar declined almost to a quarter of its previous value by the Consumer Price Index and by 10 times by the gold standard (from $38/oz to $380/oz).
More has been spent on welfare than the entire asset value of every Fortune 500 corporation and every acre of farm land combined.
The percent of the world's autos supplied by the U.S. declined from 60% to 20%.
The prison population increased four fold to a rate 5 times that of China who we accuse of human rights abuses.
The average weight of an American increased 25 pounds.
SAT scores declined 98 points.
The percent of fatherless children increased from 17.5% to 39%.

Since the 1970s:

GDP per worker declined 70% by the gold standard.
The savings rate dropped to less than 2% (versus 25% in Japan).
The public debt increased 8 fold making the U.S. is the largest debtor nation in world history.
Even with more than 1.6 million abortions each year and "the pill" the illegitimacy rate still increased five fold.
Cocaine use rose 45% in spite of the world's strictest"drug war".
Criminal justice system expenditures increased 10 fold and now exceed the budget for national defense.
The trade deficit increased from being in the black to $123 Billion in the red.
Government spending as a percent of the average American's income exceeds 42% and is rising, compared to 27% in Japan and 32% in the U.S. 3 decades ago.
Drunk driving arrests are up 5 fold while the motor vehicle fatality rate increased from 30% lower than Germany's to 45% higher in the same period.
Health services costs are up 8 fold and just the paperwork required to meet government regulations costs 3% of GDP.
The amount of time PER DAY that children watch TV increased from 5 hours to 7 hours
The number of the world's Top 50 Banks which were U.S. declined from 22 to only three (with assets of $570 Billion while 24 are Japanese with assets of $12,000 Billion)
The number of lawyers increased to 70 times more than Japan (while Japan has 4 times as many engineers).
The ratio of manufacturing employees to government employees declined from 2.5:1 to less than 1:1.
Total US "Personal Savings" are $212 Billion while Japan has $22,000 Billion (that is $22 Trillion) just in their "Postal Savings Account".
"a 560% increase in violent crime, a 419% increase in illegitimate births, a 3000% increase in single-parent households, and a drop of almost 80 points in SAT scores." (source: The Guardian).
 

 

 
 FATHERS' MANIFESTO Home Page
 
 
For comments or for more information email manifesto@christianparty.net, or search the Web 
 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party