Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.

"With this very small change in the Hebrew writing, and the
word can be changed from Syrian to Edomite! Think of it this
way, syRian or eDomite. By this above slight change, the
Hebrew 'r' sound is changed to a 'd' sound."

Thou shalt not abhor a Syrian; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.

 

God hates Esau and Edomites, not Syrians, because God's holy people are descendants of Jacob through his Syrian wife Rebekah:

Gen 25:20 And Isaac was forty years old when he took Rebekah to wife, the daughter of Bethuel the Syrian of Padanaram, the sister to Laban the Syrian.

The LORD thy God even commanded Israelites to refer to themselves as Syrians:

Deu 26:5 And thou shalt speak and say before the LORD thy God, A Syrian ready to perish [was] my father, and he went down into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and became there a nation, great, mighty, and populous:

The King James translators confused the issue by translating the Hebrew word "arammiy" [#761], from which Syrian was translated, as "Aramitess":

1Ch 7:14 The sons of Manasseh; Ashriel, whom she bare: ([but] his concubine the Aramitess bare Machir the father of Gilead:

 

 

Deuteronomy 23:7

Have you ever wondered about this verse and its seemingly
contradiction to what the rest of the Scriptures say about
Edom. Well many of us have and we present the following from
Pastor Clifton A. Emahiser, 1012 N. Vine Street, Fostoria,
Ohio 44830; Phone No. (419) 435-2836.

 

THE DEMISE OF EDOM

 

As I promised you in my last teaching letter #22, I am going to clear up and document the problem with Deuteronomy 23:7. As I told you before, there are approximately 27,000 translation errors in our present Bibles. Some various translations by various translators have attempted to clean up many of these discrepancies, but the errors are very numerous and overwhelming. The translation of Deuteronomy 23:7 is one them. I will start by quoting this passage:

 

Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.

 

From this verse it would appear that we should welcome all Edomites into our congregations with open arms and with no questions asked, and that we are somehow guilty of some dire contemptible sin for even thinking an evil thought against them. I ask you: Is this not the impression, which seized upon you when you read this passage for the first time? Remember the guilty, dirty, condemning feeling, which came over you for even giving the Edomites, the slightest hint of disparaging thought, that somehow Yahweh might suddenly kill you in your very tracks for even blinking your eye? If this has been your reaction when reading this passage in the past, forget it, for that is not what this verse is saying — not even remotely. I happened on this verse many years ago when I listened to a presentation by an Identity speaker making reference to the Edomites and using this verse as one of his points. At the time, I decided to look into the Hebrew meaning of the word for myself. I found the Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance Of The Bible assigned the term “Edomite” the Hebrew word #130 which says:

 

#130 ... Ed�m�y, ... Ed�wm�y, ed-o-mee’; patronymic [derived from father’s name] from 123; an Edomite, or descendant from (or inhabitant of) Edom: — Edomite. See 726.

 

Inasmuch as I didn’t want to overlook anything important, and I felt there was something desperately wrong with this passage, I decided to check on the word #726 which had the following to say:

 

#726 ... Ar�wm�y, ar-o-mee’; a clerical error for 130; an Edomite (as in the margin): — Syrian.

 

At once this struck me (and this was about 15 years ago), for if the proper rendering was “Syrian” instead of “Edomite”, it would make all the difference in the world. Over the years, since that time, I have pointed this clerical error out to many people of our persuasion. At the time, I knew this made more sense if Deuteronomy 23:7 were to read Syrian rather than Edomite for the Syrians were Abraham’s relatives, in which case this verse would read:

 

Thou shalt not abhor a Syrian; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.

 

Over the years, I have been satisfied that the word should have been Syrian instead of Edomite. I remember one party gave me a challenge and indicated that it was only a clerical error, and really didn’t mean anything. I finally came to the conclusion that it would be a hard proposition to prove and decided not to push the point openly any further. That is, until recently, when I was preparing for this lesson, I accidentally discovered what the clerical error was. I will now reveal to you how I made this discovery. As I had decided to take up the topic of Esau, I was in the process of reading anything and everything I could find on the subject. I was reading along in The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, volume E-J, page 24, under the subtitle Edom when I read this:

 

... there are places where, because of the similarity between the letters $ (d) and 9 (r), the text has wrongly read /9 !, “Aram” (i.e., Syria), and /*29!, Arameans” (i.e., Syrians), for /$!, “Edom”, and /*2$!, “Edomites”, such as II Kings 16:6; II Chr. 20:2, where the KJV has followed the MT, but the RSV has followed an emended text.

 

Note: I have followed the Hebrew characters as faithfully as I know how to do on my computer — I may have made a mistake. I will enclose my documentation on page 8 of this issue so you can check against my references. The main thing to notice here is the “similarity between the letters $ (d) and 9 (r).” You can see very readily, that a very small slip of the pen can change the word from Edomite to Syrian, or Syrian to Edomite. I will enlarge these two Hebrew letters and place them side-by-side so you can observe the difference in them:

 

9  $

 

Just this very small change in the Hebrew writing, and the word can be changed from Syrian to Edomite!!! Think of it this way, syRian or eDomite. This above slight change changes the Hebrew “r” sound changed to a “d” sound. What we have here so far is: the Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance Of The Bible pointing out that there is a clerical error, and, The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible pointing out the nature of the error. The Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible is actually making references to two other passages, but the principal here is the same. I will also include the Hebrew alphabet from the Wilson’s Old Testament Word Studies on page 8 of this issue so you can check the phonetic sounds of these two letters. When we find discrepancies of this nature in Scripture, we are going to have to prove them by the context of the entire Bible. Deuteronomy 23:7, with the use of the term Edomite, definitely is not in scriptural context, but with the term Syrian, it is very much in context, for it fits perfectly. With all of this, we are at a loss to know whether this is an honest scribal error or a deliberate piece of sabotage by the enemy. A very short reference to the problem of confusing Syria with Edom, or confusing Edom with Syria is alluded to in The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, volume 2, page 204 that says:

 

... in 2 Kings 16:6, “Edom” should read for “Aram”...

 

Let’s check this out in two different versions to get an idea of the nature of this error. Notice the underlined words in 2 Kings 16:6 in each version:

 

King James Version

At that time Rezin king of Syria recovered Elath to Syria, and Drave the Jews from Elath: and the Syrians came to Elath, and dwelt there unto this day.

 

The Modern Language Bible: The New Berkeley Version in Modern English

At that time Rezin king of Syria regained Elath for Edom, clearing the Jews completely out of Elath. So the Edomites came back to Elath and lived there to this day. (Underlining mine)

 

Now let’s try the other passage (2 Chronicles 20:2) mentioned by The Zondervan Pictorial Encyclopedia of the Bible, volume 2, page 204 quoted above on this same type of error of getting Syria mixed up with Edom:

 

King James Version

Then there came some that told Jehoshaphat, saying, There cometh a great multitude against thee from beyond the sea on this side of Syria; and, behold they be in Hazazontamar, which is Engedi.

 

Revised Standard Version

Some men came and told Jehoshaphat, “A great multitude is coming against you from Edom, from beyond the sea; and behold they are in Hazazon-tamar” (that is, En-gedi).

 

You can see very readily, from the two translations on each of these two verses, how great an error can come from a slight change in the Hebrew letters. If we are truly interested in Bible history, these passages can really be confusing if we didn’t know someone had made an error and how the text should really read. Now we know something that is absolutely not true about Esau-Edom. If Yahweh says that He hates Esau and all of his progeny, we, being kinsman to Him, have the same right. As a matter of fact, to hold back this hatred and keep it within us, can and will make us mentally and physically ill.

"And I HATED ESAU, and laid his mountains and his heritage
waste for the dragons of the wilderness. Whereas Edom saith,
We are impoverished, but we will return and build the
desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, They shall
build, but I will throw down; and they shall call them, The
border of wickedness, and, THE PEOPLE AGAINST WHOM THE LORD
HATH INDIGNATION FOR EVER." (Malachi 1:3-4)

"And Edom said unto him, Thou shalt not pass by me, lest I
come out against thee with the sword...And he (Edom) said,
Thou shalt not go through. And Edom came out against him
with much people, and with a strong hand. Thus Edom refused
to give Israel passage through his border: wherefore Israel
turned away from him." (Numbers 20:18-21)


Edomites

[EE dum ites] descendants of Edom, or ESAU; an ancient
people who were enemies of the Israelites. During the days
of Abraham, the region which later became the home of the
Edomites was occupied by more than one tribe of
non-Israelite peoples. When Esau moved to this region with
his family and possessions, the HORITES already lived in the
land Genesis 36:20.

Edom and Israel after Kadesh Barnea. After the years of
wilderness wandering, Moses wanted to lead Israel northward
to Canaan across Edom into Moab. The king of Edom, however,
refused them passage (Numbers 20:14-21), forcing them to
bypass Edom and Moab through the desert to the east (Judges
11:17-18. Later in the journey northward to Abel Acacia
Grove in the plains of Moab across from Jericho (Numbers
33:48-49), Balaam prophesied that Israel would one day
possess Edom.  (Numbers 24:18).

From the Conquest Until the Division. In dividing the land
of Canaan after the conquest, Joshua established Judah's
border to the west of the Dead Sea and to the border of Edom
(Joshua 15:1,21). During the reign of Saul, Israel fought
against Edom (1 Samuel 14:47). But Edomites at times served
in Saul's army (1 Samuel 21:7; 22:9).

David conquered Edom, along with a number of other adjacent
countries, and stationed troops in the land (2 Samuel
8:13-14). In later years, Solomon promoted the building of a
port on the northern coast of the Red Sea in Edomite
territory. He also built a smeltery nearby as a significant
part of his developing copper industry. (1 Kings 9:26-29).

After the Division. During the time of the Divided Kingdom,
a number of hostile encounters occurred between the nations
of Judah or Israel and Edom. During Jehoshaphat's reign,
Edomites raided Judah but were turned back. (2 Chronicles
20:1, 8). An attempt to reopen the port at Ezion Geber
failed (1 Kings 22:48); and the Edomites joined forces with
those of Judah in Jehoshaphat's move to put down the
rebellion of Mesha of Moab. (2 Kings 3:4-5) During the reign
of Joram, Edom freed herself of Judah's control (2 Kings
8:20-22), but again came under Judah's control when Amaziah
assaulted and captured Sela, their capital city. Edom became
a vassal state of Assyria, beginning about 736 B. C.

Edom the Place of the Nabateans. After the downfall of
Judah in 586 B. C., Edom rejoiced (Psalm 137:7). Edomites
settled in southern Judah as far north as Hebron. Nabateans
occupied old Edom beginning in the third century B. C.,
continuing their civilization well into the first century A.
D. During the period from about 400-100 B. C., Judas
Maccabeus subdued the Edomites and John Hyrcanus forced them
to be circumcised and then made them a part of the Jewish
people. The Herod family of New Testament times was of
Edomite stock.

Since no written Edomite records have been found, knowledge
of the Edomites comes mainly from the Bible, archaeological
excavations of their ancient cities, and references to Edom
in Egyptian, Assyrian and Babylonian sources. (from Nelson's
Illustrated Bible Dictionary) (Copyright (C) 1986, Thomas
Nelson Publishers)


Edomites

E'DOMITES (e'do-mits). The descendants of Esau, who settled
in the S of Palestine and at a later period came into
conflict with the Israelites (Deuteronomy 23:7); frequently
called merely Edom (Numbers 20:14-21; 24:18; Joshua 15:1; 2
Samuel 8:14); etc.)

Country. Edom ("Idumaea," KJV) was situated at the SE
border of Palestine (Judges 11:17; Numbers 34:3) and was
properly called the land or mountain of Seir (Genesis 36:8;
32:3; Joshua 24:4; Ezekiel 35:3, 7, 15). The country lay
along the route pursued by the Israelites from Sinai to
Kadesh-barnea and thence back again to Elath (Deuteronomy
1:2; 2:1-8), i.e., along the E side of the great valley of
Arabah. On the N of Edom lay the territory of Moab, the
boundary appearing to have been the "brook Zered."
(Deuteronomy 2:13-14, 18).

The physical geography of Edom is somewhat peculiar. Along
the western base of the mountain range are low calcareous
hills. These are succeeded by lofty masses of igneous rock,
chiefly porphyry, over which lies red and variegated
sandstone in irregular ridges and abrupt cliffs with deep
ravines between.

The latter strata give the mountains their most striking
features and remarkable colors. The average elevation of the
summit is about two thousand feet above the sea. Along the
eastern side runs an almost unbroken limestone ridge, a
thousand feet or more higher than the other. This ridge
sinks down with an easy slope into the plateau of the
Arabian Desert. Although Edom is thus wild, rugged, and
almost inaccessible, the deep glens and flat terraces along
the mountainsides are covered with rich soil, from which
trees, shrubs, and flowers now spring up luxuriantly.


People. The Edomites were descendants of Esau, or Edom, who
expelled the original inhabitants, the Horites. (Deuteronomy
2:12) A statement made in Genesis 36:31) serves to fix the
period of the dynasty of the eight kings. They "reigned in
the land of Edom before any king reigned over the sons of
Israel;" i.e., before the time of Moses, who may be regarded
as the first virtual king of Israel. (cf. Deuteronomy
33:4-5; Exodus 18:16-19). It would also appear that these
kings were elected. The chiefs ("dukes," KJV) of the
Edomites are named in (Genesis 36:40-43) and were probably
petty chiefs or sheikhs of their several clans.

History. Esau's bitter hatred toward his brother, Jacob,
for fraudulently obtaining his blessing appears to have been
inherited by his posterity. The Edomites peremptorily
refused to permit the Israelites to pass through their land.
(Numbers 20:18-21) For a period of 400 years we hear no more
of the Edomites. They were then attacked and defeated by
Saul. (1 Samuel 14:47)

Some forty years later David overthrew their army in the
"Valley of Salt," and his general, Joab, following up the
victory, destroyed nearly the whole male population (1 Kings
11:15-16) and placed Jewish garrisons in all the strongholds
of Edom. (2 Samuel 8:13-14)

Hadad, a member of the royal family of Edom, made his
escape with a few followers to Egypt, where he was kindly
received by Pharaoh. After the death of David he returned
and tried to excite his countrymen to rebellion against
Israel, but failing in the attempt he went on to Syria,
where he became one of Solomon's greatest enemies. (1 Kings
11:14-22)

In the reign of Jehoshaphat (875 B.C.) the Edomites
attempted to invade Israel in conjunction with Ammon and
Moab but were miraculously destroyed in the valley of
Beracah. (2 Chronicles 20:22, 26) A few years later they
revolted against Jehoram, elected a king, and for half a
century retained their independence. (2 Chronicles 21:8)

They were then attacked by Amaziah, and Sela, their great
stronghold, was captured (2 Kings 4:7; 2 Chronicles
25:11-12) Yet the Israelites were never again able to
completely subdue them. 2 Chronicles 28:17)

WHEN NEBUCHADNEZZAR BESIEGED JERUSALEM THE EDOMITES JOINED
HIM AND TOOK AN ACTIVE PART IN THE PLUNDER OF THE CITY AND
slaughter OF THE ISRAELITES. THEIR CRUELTY AT THAT TIME
SEEMS TO BE SPECIALLY REFERRED TO IN (Psalm 137).

IT WAS ON ACCOUNT OF THESE ACTS OF CRUELTY COMMITTED
AGAINST THE ISRAELITES  IN THE DAY OF THEIR CALAMITY THAT
THE EDOMITES WERE SO FEARFULLY DENOUNCED BY THE LATER
PROPHETS. (Isaiah 34:5-8; 63:1-4; Jeremiah 49:17;
Lamentations 4:21; Ezekiel 25:13-14; Amos 1:11-12; Obadiah
8-10, 15


On the conquest of Judah, the Edomites, probably in reward
for their services during the war, were permitted to settle
in southern Palestine and the whole plateau between it and
Egypt; but at about the same time they were driven out of
Edom proper by the Nabateans.

For more than four centuries they continued to prosper. But
during the warlike rule of the Maccabees they were again
completely subdued and even forced to conform to Jewish laws
and rites and submit to the government of Jewish prefects.

THE EDOMITES WERE THAN INCORPORATED INTO THE JEWISH NATION,
AND THE WHOLE PROVINCE WAS OFTEN TERMED BY GREEK AND ROMAN
WRITERS "IDUMAEA."

Immediately before the siege of Jerusalem by Titus, twenty
thousand Idumaeans were admitted to the Holy City, which
they filled with robbery and bloodshed. From this time the
Edomites, as a separate people, disappear from the pages of
history. Scriptural indications that they were idolaters (2
Chronicles 25:14-15, 20) are amply confirmed and illuminated
by discoveries at Petra. For a discussion of the degrading
practices of Edomite religion, see George L. Robinson, The
Sarcophagus of an Ancient Civilization. (bibliography: D. N.
Freedman and E. F. Campbell, eds., Biblical Archaeologist
Reader 2 (1964): 51-58; T. C. Vriezen, Oudtestament Studien
14 (1965): 330-53; N. Glueck, The Other Side of Jordan
(1970); D. J. Wiseman, ed., Peoples of Old Testament Times
(1973), pp. 229-58). (from New Unger's Bible Dictionary)
(originally published by Moody Press of Chicago, Illinois.
Copyright (C) 1988.)

There always seems to be someone writing on a subject for
which they really haven't done their research. In preparing
this lesson, I ran into a good example of such a person.
Actually another person got the information from the
Internet. No doubt, there may be a vast amount of
information on the Internet, but it would appear we need to
be very careful with some of the things being promoted from
such a source. Generally, if we will examine what is being
advanced, we can see through the subterfuge. While many
times it's just a matter of ignorance there are other times
when the writer has an agenda. This article has the title
"The Chronology Of Egypt And Israel," and was downloaded
from
http://bilbicalstudies.qldwide.net.au/chronolgy_of_egypt_and_Israel.html.
On page 12, the writer seems to be a David K. Down, P.O. Box
341, Hornsby, NSW.

On page one, the writer lays his premise. He points to 1
Kings 6:1 to establish the Exodus at 1445 B.C. He then
refers to a Dr. Immanual Velikovsky who supposedly makes the
claim that Egyptian history is 600 years to old. This is
what is said on page one:

"... Dr. Immanual Velikovsky's claims that the fault lies,
not with the Biblical information, but with the generally
accepted chronology of Egypt, and that the Egyptian dates
need to be reduced by some 600 years at the time of the
Exodus. This would mean that the ruling dynasty of Egypt at
the time of the Exodus would be the 13th dynasty, rather
than the 18th or 19th dynasty as is now generally believed,
and the Pharaohs who ruled at the time of Joseph and Moses
were the Kings of the 12th dynasty. When this system is
adopted there is found to be remarkable agreement between
the histories of Egypt and Israel."

If you will remember, this is similar to the position which
F. David Fry took in his book "Hebrew Sages of Ancient Egypt
(A Revised Discipline In Antiquity)," which I spoke about in
lesson #31. I must point out again, people like Fry and
David K. Down quoted above failed to check out the
archaeological finds which have been made at Jericho. The
following is what I said concerning this in that lesson:

"Finds at Jericho prove beyond all doubt that Fry cannot be
correct. If you know your Bible story of Jericho, it will be
remembered that after the Israelites destroyed it, Joshua
placed a curse on it that it would never again be occupied."
With this in mind, let's read "The Thompson Chain-Reference
Bible," "Archaeological Supplement," page 1802, �1990:

"On the outskirts of the old city mound Garstang discovered
a cemetery where he opened scores of graves that yielded
quantities of pottery vessels, considerable jewelry, and
about 170 scarab beatles. In these tombs he found pottery
>from the Early Middle, and Late Bronze periods, but only a
few shards of Mycenian ware ... The Egyptian scarabs can be
dated with certainty since they mention various pharaohs by
name and represent each of them from Thutmose III, another
that of Amenhotep II, who was depicted as an archer,
corresponding well with his tomb records in Egypt. The
series of dated scarabs end with the two royal seals of
Amenhotep III ... Nothing else in the tombs suggests later
dates."

As Joshua had placed a curse on anyone who might try to
rebuild and occupy Jericho (Joshua 6:26), this is very good
evidence that these 18th Egyptian pharaohs lived before
Jericho was destroyed by the Israelites under Joshua's
command. This evidence alone blows Fry and Down clean out of
the water.

On pages 7-9 Down postulates that the Egyptian Queen
Hatshepsut was the Queen of Sheba; that somehow Queen
Hatshepsut was contemporary with Solomon. It makes one
wonder how any of Queen Hatshepsut's scarabs ended up 450
years previous to Solomon's time in the ruins of Jericho,
doesn't it? I thought maybe the next thing that Down might
contend was that Pharaoh Ramesses II, the Great, was
contemporary with Alexander the Great, or maybe even the
same person. Who knows how such a mind reasons.

Then on page 9, Down tries to identify Shishak of Egypt (1
Kings 11:40; 14:25-26) as "Thutmosis." Although he didn't
say which Thutmosis, he could only mean Thutmosis III. Here
is a good example of starting with a false premise, and then
trying to build on it. I hope you are beginning to see how
important it is that we be careful in our research in order
to get things in their proper sequence. So much for that.

God of the Day vs. God of the Night

It seems that Egypt may have had their version of
Genesis 3:15. there have been and are two classes of people
in the world in an all-out opposing WAR with each other;
namely, the children of light and the children of darkness.
There seems to be evidence of this in Egypt. To show you
this, I will quote from "Cleopatra's Needles," by E.A.
Wallis Budge, pages 80-83:

"One of the most important temples rebuilt, or more
probably founded by Amenemhat I, was the great temple that
he dedicated to the Sun-god of Heliopolis, in his forms of
Her-em-aakhu ... i.e., Horus on the eastern or morning
horizon, and Atem ... i.e., the Sun-god on the western or
evening horizon. The city of Heliopolis, called in Egyptian
Anu Meht ... i.e., the 'Northern Anu' to distinguish it from
Anu rest ... the 'Southern Anu' or Hermonthis, which lies a
few miles to the south of Thebes, was one of the oldest
cities in Egypt. From time immemorial Helioplois formed the
terminus of the caravan roads from the north, west and
south, and was in consequence a flourishing trade center.
(No wonder the Hyksos wanted it]. It is probable that it was
the capital of the 'kings of the North,' i.e., Lower Egypt,
in predynastic times. It was home of many cult (belief
systems), first and foremost among which was the cult of the
Sun-god, whose various forms were, in early times, called
Khepera, Atem, etc.

"The Hebrews called the city 'On' or 'Aven' (Genesis 41:45,
50; Ezekiel 30:17) and 'Beth Shemesh,' (Jeremiah 43:13), or
'House of the Sun,' and it will be remembered that Joseph
married a daughter of Potipherah (in Egyptian ..
Pa-ta-pa-Ra, 'The gift of Ra'), a priest of On (Genesis
41:45, 50; 46:20). There was a famous well or fountain at
Heliopolis in which, according to tradition, the Sun-god Ra
bathed his face when he rose for the first time on the
world. This well is still to be seen at Matariyah, which the
Arabs call 'Ain ash-Shems,' i.e., 'Fountain of the Sun.'

"It is stated in the Apocryphal Books that the Virgin Mary
rested by this well, and drew from it the water with which
she washed the clothes of her Child, and that wherever the
water fell balsam-bearing plants sprang up; drops of oil
made from them were always mixed with the water used in
baptizing Christians ... The priests of Heliopolis were
famed for their leaning, and they were a very powerful body
at all times. Little is known of them or of their god Ra ...
under Dynasties I-III, but the name of their god forms part
of the praenomen of Neb-ka-Ra, a king of the IIIrd dynasty,
and it also appears in the names Khaf-Ra and Men-kau-Ra,
kings of the IV Dynasty. The first three kings of the Vth
Dynasty were sons of a high priest of Ra, and from this
time, onwards each Pharaoh bore a special name as the 'son
of Ra.'

"Several of the kings of the Vth Dynasty built great
'sun-temples' on the west bank of the Nile at Abu Gurab and
Abusir, and the object of the cult was a monolith, probably
of sandstone, in the form of a short obelisk resting on a
plinth of pedestal in the form of a truncated pyramid. That
the priests of Ra. were able to seize the throne of Egypt,
and the priests of Ra. were able to seize the throne of
Egypt and to set, first, members of their corporation and,
next, their nominees upon it in succession makes it clear
that they were predominant among the priesthood of that
country ... Ra. was the god of the day and of this world,
and his power was believed to be supreme and absolute; all
the other great gods were regarded as forms of him. But when
his priesthood attempted to force his cult upon all
Egyptians in the South as well as upon those in the North,
they found it most difficult to accomplish, because the
people generally worshiped the ancient, and perhaps
Indigenous, God Osiris ... Asar, or Asari, the god of the
night, the Underworld and death. A GREAT STRUGGLE TOOK PLACE
BETWEEN THE PRIESTHOOD OF RA AND THE PRIESTHOOD OF OSIRIS,
and in the end the supposed powers of Ra and the extent of
his dominion were curtailed ..."

It appears that the early Egyptian dynasty kings, their
names being "sons of Ra.," was symbolic for "sons of light."
On page 92 of this same book we are told that Thothmes I
looked favorably on the priesthood at Heliopolis. Thothmes I
(Tuthmosis I) was still of unmixed royal blood. This is what
the passage says:

"... Thothmes I was the first king who set up obelisks in
Thebes, and in view of the later religious history of the
XVIIIth Dynasty his actions seem to show that he was
favorably disposed to the doctrines of the priesthood of
Heliopolis, and that he wished to link the cult of Ra. with
that of the Theban god amen. As Usertsen I had set up a pair
of obelisks before the house of Ra at Hellopolis, so
Thothmes I set up a pair before a pylon of the temple of
Amen.

"The obelisk that is still standing is about 90 feet high,
and is in a good state of preservation ... A single column
of inscription originally occupied the middle of each of the
four faces, and from these texts we learn that Thothmes I
dedicated 'two great obelisks' ... to his father Amen-Ra. On
the pieces of the fallen obelisk the cartouches of Thothmes
III are found, and because of this some have argued that
this obelisk was made by Thothmes III and not by Thothmes I,
but the inscription of the latter on the standing obelisk
speaks distinctly of two obelisks, and the official Anni
states in his biography that he superintended the erection
of two obelisks. It is probable that Thothmes I died before
his inscriptions were cut on the second obelisk and that it
was usurped by Thothmes III ..."

Page 169:

"Horus of the Double Crown, Beloved of Ra, King of the
South and the North, Men-kheper-Ra. The monuments of the
gods the lover, supplying with meat and drink the altar of
the souls of Heliopolis making to be satisfied their
Majesties at the two seasons (i.e., morning and evening).
This [is] with them with life [and] serenity for hundreds of
thousands of the Set Festival, many, great, sons of Ra.,
Thothmes, governor of the god, of Ra.-Harakhtes beloved,
living for ever."

We should not be surprised that Thothmes I looked favorably
on the priesthood of Heliopolis, for the Bible tells us that
a pharaoh gave Joseph his wife. (Genesis 41:45) But, if you
will remember, Thothmes III (Tuthmosis III) was not of pure
royal blood. This is the same Tuthmosis III that Queen
Hatshepsut prevented from gaining the throne for a number of
years, after which he tried to destroy all memory of her.
HERE AGAIN, WE SEE GENESIS 3:15 AT WORK BETWEEN THE TRUE
ROYAL BLOOD OF THE PHARAOHS OF EGYPT AND THE CORRUPTED BLOOD
OF THE ENEMY GAINING THE THRONE. It is obvious, that if we
can't understand the Satanic seedline, we can understand
neither Bible nor history. In other words, there are a lot
of people walking around in a lopsided dream-world of
universal religion.

Ben of the Ben

In the last lesson (#41), we discussed the subject of
the"Ben Stone," many times referred to as the "benben." I
will now repeat part of a quote I used in that lesson from
"Cleopatra's Needles," by E.A. Wallis Budge, page 8:

"At a period which is so remote that no date can be
assigned to it, the people of Anu (the On of the Hebrews and
the Heliopolis of the Greeks) had as the object of their
cult a stone, which was thick at the base and tapered to a
point at the top, and much resembled in shape the funerary
stelae found in the tombs of Tcha, or Tchat, and other early
kings at Abydos. This stone was called Ben, and in the texts
of the 6th Dynasty its determinative resembles a small
obelisk ... i.e., a short, thick shaft surrounded by a
little pyramid ... Why this Ben Stone was sacred, or how it
acquired its sanctity, is not known ..."

If the priesthood at Heliopolis were Shemites, which we can
be fairly assured they were, we really shouldn't be
surprised at such a stone called the "benben." In the Hebrew
the term "ben" means "son." The Hebrew term "ben" is #1121
in the Strong's Concordance. It is used in Genesis 3:16,
"thou shalt bring forth children;" genesis 4:25, "and she
bare a son;" Genesis 30:1, "Give me children or else I die;"
Exodus 34:7, "visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the
children, and upon the children's children;" Proverbs 13:22,
"leaveth an inheritance to his children's children;"
Ecclesiastes 2:3, "sons of men (Adam)" and 1 Kings 20:35,
"sons of the prophets."

What is interesting is that the Egyptian hieroglyphic sign
for "ben" is a man's foot up to just below the knee.
Therefore, I believe we can be sure that it has something to
do with a man or mankind. It would seem that a man's
footsteps could surely represent a man's life, (or a woman's
for that matter). When there are two feet in the
hieroglyphics, it is then "benben." It appears that it might
be saying "sons of sons," or possibly "children of
children." This sounds to me like the genealogy of a family,
is it possible the "Ben Stone" is sacred, as it represents
the Almighty's family or posterity?

The "Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies," explains the
term "ben," in its various forms, as follows on page 404:

"SON. 1 ... a son by whom parents are built up and families
increased; also a son by adoption, Exodus 2:10; by creation
and preservation, as the angels, Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7; by
regeneration, as the faithful Psalm 73:15; Proverbs 14:26;
who are loved, sanctified and blessed of God as their
Father, Exodus 4:22; Deuteronomy 14:1; Isaiah 1:2; Jeremiah
3:19; Hosea 11:1. The young of any creature, Metaph., the
branch is a son with respect of the tree, Psalm 80:15; the
scholar with respect to his master (sons of the prophets),
an arrow with respect to the bow or quiver, Job 41:38; corn
with respect to the threshing-floor, Isaiah 21:10; a hill is
the son of oil with respect to fertility, Isaiah 5:1; a
wicked person is a son of Belial or wickedness; a person
guilty of a capital crime is a son of death, 1 Samuel 20:31.
Any man is said to be a son in respect to the years of his
age, a son of two, & etc. 2 ... a son, from the idea of
begetting, being born; the common word for son in Chaldee,
but in Hebrew only poetic ... 3 ... to make affinity by
marriage ... to be son-in-law ... 4 ... to beget; to bear
... a child ... 5 ... progeny, offspring ... condition of a
son. 6 ... posterity, son's son." (I.e., benben, my
observation)

The Ashet Tree

Of particular interest are the inscriptions found on the
obelisks of Queen Hatshepsut where affectionate mention is
made to an "Ashet tree." Wallis Budge makes reference to the
"Ashet tree" three times in his book "Cleopatra's Needles,"
on the following pages:

Page 95: "Marked out for him the lord of the gods of the
Set festival on the Ashet tree; the son of Ra., Thothmes
diademed like Ra., beloved of Amen-Ra. Ka-mut-f, endowed
with life for ever."

Page 105: "Her father, Amen, hath established her great
name, Maat-ka-Ra, on the Holy Ashet tree, being united to
life, stability and serenity. The son of Ra, the counterpart
of Amen, Hatshepsut, beloved of Amen-Ra, the king of the
gods ... this beautiful [and enduring] monument ... which
she made (i.e., dedicated) to him on the first day of the
Set Festival, she doing this that life might be given to her
for ever.

Pages 170-171: "Horus of the Double Crown, Bull mighty of
Ra beloved, King of the South and the North, Men-Kheper-Ra.
Established Father Tem his name great of cartouches with
enduring sovereignty in the Great House of Anu, when he gave
to him the throne of God [and] the rank of Khepera, the son
of Ra., Thothmes, righteous governor, of the Souls of
Heliopolis beloved, given life forever ... Horus of the
Double Crown, Bull mighty crowned by Truth, King of the
south and the North, Men-Kheper-Ra. Multiplied for him the
Lord of the gods ... Set knowing that his son was I, flesh
producing from Neb-er-tcher, the son of Ra. Thothmes,
governor of Heliopolis, of Ra.-Harakhthes beloved, living
for ever."

Undoubtedly, if the priesthood at Heliopolis was of the
House of Shem, it would be safe to conclude that the "Set
Festivals" were the celebration of Seth as their patriarch,
and the "Holy Ashet tree" could possibly represent the Seth
family tree. For some confirmation that this might be true,
I will now quote from a book entitled "The World of the
Past," edited by Jacquetta Hawks, chapter 2, "Greece and
Crete," "The Bronze Age of Hesiod:"

"The Greek poet Hesiod wrote his Works and Days in the
eighth century B.C. In it he divides human history into five
Ages. His pre-archaeological idea of a Bronze Age preceding
an Iron Age probably owes something to genuine folk memory

'Then Zeus the father again made humankind,
A breed of bronze, far differently designed,
A bred from the Ash-tree sprung, huge-limbed and dread,
Lovers of battle and horror, no eaters of bread,
Their hearts were hard, their adamant hearts: none stood,
To meet their power of limbs and their hardihood,
And the swing of the terrible arms their shoulders bore.
Bronze were their arms, bronze the armour they word,
And their tools; for no dark iron suppled their needs ...'"

Often we wonder where some of our family names came from;
the name "Ash" being one of them. Checking my phone book
there are several, including Ashburn and Ashcraft. Are these
names more ancient than we imagine? Could the Tribe of
Asher, for instance, be named after the "Ash-tree" family of
Seth? Out of many varieties of ash, there is one named
Oleace�, which is related to the OLIVE TREE, producing a
single winged seed; a most useful tree as regards to rapid
growth and production of lumber, and being distinguished for
its height, shape, and graceful foliage. Ash wood is hard,
stiff and especially strong, and mainly used for shovel,
hoe, and rake handles. It is also used for spears, boat oars
and baseball bats. No doubt, a great wood for "battle-ax"
handles. How fitting a tree to represent our people. Does
all this seem to exemplify the Adam-man?

Another point worth mentioning which the poet Hesiod puts
forth is: not all peoples were created at the same time;
that there was a separate creation of a SPECIAL KIND of man.
Do you notice how this "differently designed" man is
described similar to Jeremiah 51:20 as: "my battle axe and
weapons of war ... ?"

Herodotus on the "Phoenix"

I shall address Herodotus' version of the "phoenix bird"
story. Before I do, however, I would like to show some of
Herodotus' other deductions. Once we observe some of his
conclusions, caution might be advisable. Let's go back to
"Cleopatra's Needles," by E.A. Wallis Budge, page 9, for his
reported version:

"The home of this bird was someplace in Arabia, and a
phoenix visited Heliopolis at the close of every period of
500 years. Towards the end of his life he built a nest in
Arabia to which he imported the power of generation, so when
he died another phoenix arose out of it. When the new
phoenix had grown up he went to Heliopolis and burned his
father, whose ashes he burned in the temple of the Sun-god
there."

On February 21, Educational channel 30, WGTE, Toledo, Ohio,
ran a program entitled "Lost City of the Pyramids." It was
about a city some archaeologists had found where the workers
were housed during the construction of the Great Pyramid at
Giza. As the story developed, with archaeological evidence,
they established with little doubt that Herodotus' account
of the building of the pyramids lacked credibility. The
following are excerpts of the narration of that program:

"The most common myth about the pyramid builders is that
they were slaves. This view made popular by Hollywood
actually dates back to the Greek historian Herodotus. He
visited Egypt 2700 years after the pyramids had been
finished, and was told by his guide that slaves had provided
the labor. With no contradictonary evidence this view has
persisted, and it is still offered in modern-day guidebooks
... Egyptologist Mark Lehner believed evidence of large
scale food production was an important clue ...

"Hundreds of bread molds and numerous baking pits indicated
food preparation on a vast scale. Archaeologists had the
first sign that the site was the base for a large
undertaking ... elsewhere on the site, other bones were
found that indicated a healthy and diverse diet ... our
animal bone specialist tells us there is an awful lot of
cattle, and cattle is very expensive meat; came from the
provinces. And a lot of the cattle we are finding here is
prime cut and under two years of age. So, everything about
our site suggests its expensive.

"Far from the image of starving laborers surviving on
rations, this site has revealed a work force who drank beer,
and ate baked bread, fresh fish, and expensive cuts of prime
beef. From the tombs in the town a picture was emerging of a
construction project manned by a large number of workers who
were well fed and highly organized ... The equal numbers of
men and women, and the proportion of children, including
babies as young as two months, suggested to the scientists
that they were examining whole families ... As hoped, the
DNA proved conclusively that there were complete families
living in the city of the pyramid builders. This was no work
camp, but a thriving social community ... The high standard
of medical care the laborers of the plateau enjoyed makes it
quite unlikely that they were slaves ...

"Why, for instance, spend time and effort looking after
slaves? If this was simply slave labor, then another slave
can be brought in ... The evidence continued to build: their
tombs; the food the workers ate; and the medical care they
received all suggest a community that was treated as
something of an elite ... In his account, the Greek
historian Herodotus was clear; he had recorded that it had
taken 100,000 slaves 30 years to build the great Pyramid of
Khufu, but the picture that was emerging from the excavation
was a vastly different one. The discoveries had already
proved Herodotus wrong once. The pyramid builders had
clearly not been slaves. Would the findings now reveal that
he was also wrong about the number of workers and the
methods they had used."

As the story turned out, at least according to this
program, Herodotus was wrong on that score too. It was
estimated by a Dr. Craig Smith, a modern engineering
consultant, that it would have been more likely 20,000 men
working 20 years to build the Great Pyramid. What does this
have to do with the phoenix? It shows that if Herodotus was
wrong about the building of the Great Pyramid, he could be
wrong about the phoenix bird story also. In researching this
topic, I can see where Herodotus might have been relying too
much on his contemporary Egyptian folk tale. When we realize
that Herodotus was investigating the story 2700 years after
the fact, it's hard to imagine how much the story might have
been corrupted by his time. Again this is something I will
have to take up in the next lesson. I will tell you this,
though: there seems to be a connection between the "phoenix
bird" of Heliopolis and the Phoenicians, and we've only
gotten a good start on this thing.

I have been getting all kinds of reports of various
teachings being introduced into Identity circles. For the
life of me, I can only wonder where all this garbage is
coming from. Furthermore, the enemy is really blasting away
on television employing every possible avenue to promote his
multicultural program. The tide of interracial relationships
and marriages is rising steadily. It is evident that we are
under attack from without and within. I must warn you,
everyone who is spouting Israel Identity is not necessarily
a friend. Have you ever wondered what "Jewry's" Luciferin
priesthood means in Protocol No. 14 which says:

"Our philosophers will discuss all the shortcomings of the
varius beliefs of the non-Jews. But no one will bring under
discussion our faith from its true point of view since this
will be learned by none save ours, who will never dare
betray its secret?"

If there were ever a belief system the enemy would want to
infiltrate and destroy, it would be the Israel Identity
message. There are some now who are ashamed of this name
designation. If it was good enough for John Wilson and
Edward Hine, it's good enough for me, and I shall continue
to use it.

(I agree, I still use it, and I am not afraid of what the
enemy calls us, or how they try to demonize us; for I know
that my God: Yahweh reigns in all things and that they
cannot do anything without His permission.)

The so-called "Christian" television has joined the enemy
in their agenda of promoting race-mixing. I caught one of
John Hagee's programs which I later tried to record when it
was rebroadcast. In my at5tempt to record him, I missed his
pro-interracial remarks. I did get his last few word where
he said this:

"We're (meaning all races) one in the spirit, and if that's
too liberal for your red-neck theology, hit the door, we
need your seat."

I also managed to get his remarks on the "Jews" when he
stated:

"... The third kind of hatred or enmity, mentioned in
Scriptures, is anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism is the hatred of
the Jewish people. The Romans called the Jewish religion
barbaric superstition. Why? Because the Jewish people
circumcise their sons on the eighth day, according to the
Commandment of God to enter into the Covenant.

"The Romans looked at what God told the Jewish people to
do, and called it barbaric superstition. God called it a
Covenant relationship. The Jews considered the Gentiles as
unclean because they were polytheist; they had hundreds of
gods, as did the Romans. They believed that; they ate
swine's flesh which made them unclean. And, they were in
general, and I'm talking about the Gentiles, and his word
Gentile, was the word goyim, which in the King James is
translated heathen. So when you read the word heathen in the
King James version, your picture is right beside it, cause
that's us. The heathen were sexual; were sexually immoral.
All you have to do is read Acts 15 and 1st Corinthians to
understand what Paul was trying to get the Gentiles to do.

"Anti-Semitism is alive and well in America. Let me tell
you this: Genesis 12:1 and 3 says: 'I will bless those that
bless you, and I will curse those who curse you.' If
something within you resents the Jewish people, that
something is a demon spirit. The Jewish people, according to
the Word of God, are the apple of God's eye. The nation of
Israel is the object of God's affection, for David said: 'He
that keepth Israel (and the phrase 'keep' was a military
term), he that defends Israel neither slumbers nor sleeps.'
Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and Jesus Christ were all Jews.
How can Christians praise the dead Jews of the past and hate
the Jews living across the street? You cannot do that. It is
not possi8ble to say: 'I'm a Christian' and be an
anti-Semite. Anti-Semitism is sin, and as sin, it damns the
soul. If anti-Semitism is in your thought, is in your
speech, is in your nature, get it out, because the judgment
of God will come to you ..."

I don't have to tell you, there is no doubt about it, that
Hagee is in bed with the enemy! He is aiding and abetting
them in a time of WAR! Folks, we are living in dangerous
times.

There does not seem to much doubt that Hagee will be one of
these:

"Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. Not every
one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the
kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father
which is in heaven. Many will say to me in that day, Lord,
Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name
have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful
works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you:
depart from me, ye that work iniquity." (Matthew 7:20-23)

Today (August 7, 2001), there was a professed "teacher" on
"Christian television." He started talking about the
Abrahamic Covenant, and how the whole human race is offered
salvation through it. He repeated this "whole human race'
doctrine three times. Each time he quoted a Scripture he
used it out of context. When he quoted Genesis 3:15, the
only subject he discussed was that "Christ" was the seed of
the woman. However, he never so much as mentioned the seed
of the serpent. He went through the usual routine of nominal
or Judeo-"Churchianity," trying to prove the Law was done
away with.

Here was a man trying to present himself as an authority on
the Word of Yahweh, and does not have the slightest iota of
what it is all about. When we consider characters of this
man's nature, and the perilous danger our race is in today,
we can begin to realize our dilemma. People like this have
nothing to offer in our time of need. They are only working
against us; against the Almighty and His Kingdom. They are
no good to themselves nor anyone else, and at judgment they
will stand empty-handed before Yahweh.

"WOE BE UNTO THE PASTORS THAT DESTROY AND SCATTER THE SHEEP
OF MY PASTURE! ... Therefore thus saith the LORD God of
Israel AGAINST THE PASTORS THAT FEED MY PEOPLE; YE HAVE
SCATTERED MY FLOCK, AND DRIVEN THEM AWAY, AND HAVE NOT
VISITED THEM: BEHOLD, I WILL VISIT UPON YOU THE EVIL OF YOUR
DOINGS ... For the land is full of adulterers; for because
of swearing the land mourneth; the pleasant places of the
wilderness are dried up, and their course is evil, and their
force is not right. For both prophet and priest are profane;
yea, IN MY HOUSE HAVE I FOUND THEIR WICKEDNESS ...Wherefore
their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the
darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein: for I
WILL BRING EVIL UPON THEM, EVEN THE YEAR OF THEIR VISITATION
... I HAVE SEEN FOLLY IN THE PROPHETS ... THEY PROPHESIED IN
BAAL, AND CAUSED MY PEOPLE ISRAEL TO ERR. I HAVE SEEN ALSO
IN THE PROPHETS ... AN HORRIBLE THING: THEY COMMIT ADULTERY,
AND WALK IN LIES: THEY STRENGTHEN ALSO THE HANDS OF
EVILDOERS, THAT NONE DOTH RETURN FROM HIS WICKEDNESS: THEY
ARE ALL OF THEM UNTO ME AS SODOM, AND THE INHABITANTS
THEREOF AS GOMORRAH. Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts
concerning the prophets; BEHOLD, I WILL FEED THEM WITH
WORMWOOD, AND MAKE THEM DRINK THE WATER OF GALL: FOR FROM
THE PROPHETS ... IS PROFANENESS GONE FORTH INTO ALL THE
LAND. Thus saith the LORD of hosts, HEARKEN NOT UNTO THE
WORDS OF THE PROPHETS THAT PROPHESY UNTO YOU: THEY MAKE YOU
VAIN: THEY SPEAK A VISION OF THEIR OWN HEART, AND NOT OUT OF
THE MOUTH OF THE LORD. THEY SAY STILL UNTO THEM THAT DESPISE
ME ... Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in
fury, even a grievous whirlwind: IT SHALL FALL GRIEVOUSLY
UPON THE HEAD OF THE WICKED... I HAVE NOT SENT THESE
PROPHETS, YET THEY RAN: I HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO THEM, YET THEY
PROPHESIED. BUT IF THEY HAD STOOD IN MY COUNSEL, AND HAD
CAUSED MY PEOPLE TO HEAR MY WORDS, THEN THEY SHOULD HAVE
TURNED THEM FROM THEIR EVIL WAY, AND FROM THE EVIL OF THEIR
DOINGS... I HAVE HEARD WHAT THE PROPHETS SAID, THAT PROPHESY
LIES IN MY NAME ... WHICH THINK TO CAUSE MY PEOPLE TO FORGET
MY NAME BY THEIR DREAMS ... AS THEIR FATHERS HAVE FORGOTTEN
MY NAME FOR BAAL ... THEREFORE, BEHOLD, I AM AGAINST THE
PROPHETS ... THAT STEAL MY WORDS EVERY ONE FROM HIS
NEIGHBOUR. BEHOLD, I AM AGAINST THE PROPHETS ... BEHOLD, I
AM AGAINST THEM THAT PROPHESY FALSE DREAMS ... AND CAUSE MY
PEOPLE TO ERR BY THEIR LIES, AND BY THEIR LIGHTNESS; YET I
SENT THEM NOT, NOR COMMANDED THEM: THEREFORE THEY SHALL NOT
PROFIT THIS PEOPLE AT ALL ... THEREFORE, BEHOLD, I, EVEN I,
WILL UTTERLY FORGET YOU, AND I WILL FORSAKE YOU, AND THE
CITY THAT I GAVE YOU AND YOUR FATHERS, AND CAST YOU OUT OF
MY PRESENCE: AND I WILL BRING AN EVERLASTING REPROACH UPON
YOU, AND A PERPETUAL SHAME, WHICH SHALL NOT BE FORGOTTEN."
(Jeremiah 23:1-40)

 

(Exo 15:15) Then the chiefs of Edom were terrified; the leaders of Moab were seized by trembling; all the dwellers of Canaan were melted.

(Exo 15:16) Terrors and dread fell on them; by the greatness of Your arm; they are silent as a stone, until Your people pass through, O Jehovah, until pass through the people whom You have bought.

 

(Num 20:18) And Edom said to him, You shall not pass through me, lest I come out with the sword against you.

(Num 20:19) And the sons of Israel said to him, We shall go in the highway; and if we drink of your waters, our cattle and us, then I shall give their price. Only let me pass through on my feet; there shall be no speech.

 

(Num 20:21) And Edom refused to allow Israel to pass over through his border. And Israel turned away from him.

 

(Num 24:18) And Edom shall be a possession; and Seir shall be a possession, for his foes; but Israel shall do mightily.

(Num 24:19) And one out of Jacob shall rule, and will destroy the survivors from Ar.

 

(1Ch 18:12) And Abishai the son of Zeruiah had killed eighteen thousand of the Edomites in the Valley of Salt;

(1Ch 18:13) and he put command posts in Edom, and all the Edomites were servants to David. And Jehovah preserved David wherever he went.

 

(2Ch 21:9) And Jehoram passed over with his chiefs, and all the chariots with him; and it happened that he rose up by night and struck the Edomites who were coming all around him; and the commanders of the chariots.

(2Ch 21:10) And Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah to this day. Then Libnah revolted at that time from under his hand, because he had forsaken Jehovah, the God of his fathers.

 

(2Ch 25:14) And it happened, after Amaziah came in from smiting the Edomites, that he brought in the gods of the sons of Seir and made them stand as gods for himself; and bowed himself before them, and burned incense to them.

(2Ch 25:15) And the anger of Jehovah glowed against Amaziah, and he sent a prophet to him; and he said to him, Why have you sought the gods of the people that have not delivered their people out of your hand?

 

(2Ch 28:17) And again the Edomites had come and struck Judah, and had seized a captivity.

(2Ch 28:18) And the Philistines had raided against the cities of the low country, and of the south of Judah, and captured Beth-shemesh and Aijalon, and Gederoth, and Shocho and its daughter villages, and Timnah and its daughter villages, and Gimzo and its daughter villages, and dwelt there.

 

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party