Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

xmas3.gif (5351 bytes)

Unconstitional, Anti-Christ "Family Law" Acts

bullet

Court of Judiciary is unconstitutional and it was not in our 1901 Alabama constitution and it was deceptfully put in 1973 without a vote of the people.

bullet

None of the "family law acts" implemented in every state between 1970 and 1973 were ever voted on by the people nor debated by the legislatures.

bullet

"The husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform thereto" was displaced with "Husband and wife contract towards each other obligations of mutual respect, fidelity, and support".

bullet

"The husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform thereto." Ohio General Code of 1910

bullet

New Mexico marriage laws provided that "[t]he husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform thereto." NMSA 1953, �57-2-2 (1907) (repealed 1973); see also NMSA 1953, �57-4-3 (1927) (repealed 1973) (granting husbands the exclusive right to manage and control personal property shared by their wives under the state's community property laws).

bullet

Husband as Head of Family. The husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living and the wife must conform thereto. Section 1652 (32 Okla. St. Ann. ?2). Title 32 O.S. 2 (1971), provides: "The husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living and the wife must conform thereto."

bulletMont. Rev. Code Ann. � 36–102 (1947): Rights of husband as head of family. "The husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform thereto."

 

 

For 2,000 to 5,000 years it was understood by hundreds of millions of Christians worldwide that the father is the head of the family, so what changed in 1973 that caused men and women to both view this role differently?

"Many of these early laws were repealed or amended in direct response to the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment in 1972. See, e.g., 1973 N.M. Laws, ch. 58, � 1 (revising the definition of "unlawful discriminatory practice" under the New Mexico Human Rights Act, NMSA 1978, � 28-1-7 (1995), to expand prohibitions on sex discrimination)"

"The state statute alleged to have been drawn in question by appellant as repugnant to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was 7996 of the Ohio General Code of 1910 providing that "The husband is the head of the family. He may choose any reasonable place or mode of living, and the wife must conform thereto." The Probate Court was said to have upheld that section as establishing the legal domicile of the children with their father and, on that basis, to have upheld the Wisconsin decree as validly depriving their mother of her custody over her children, although the Wisconsin court never obtained personal jurisdiction over her."

The California Family Law Act of 1970

If American men were familiar with the "family law" they are subjected to upon marriage, they would never, ever apply for a "marriage license".  This "family law" doesn't even pass the first stage of the smile test--no lawyer in the land can look in the mirror and think about any section in the "family law" without seeing himself smile.  The passage of this law in 1970 caused an immediate 38.5% jump in the number of divorces in California, more divorces than there had been marriages just 9 years earlier, in 1961.

The following is from http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/fam/7880%2D7884.html

7883. If a person personally served with a citation within this state as provided in Section 7880 fails without reasonable cause to appear and abide by the order of the court, or to bring the child before the court if so required in the citation, the failure constitutes a contempt of court.

7884. (a) Unless requested by the child concerning whom the petition has been filed and any parent or guardian present, the public shall not be admitted to a proceeding under this part. (b) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), the judge may admit those persons the judge determines have a direct and legitimate interest in the particular case or in the work of the court.

This is in direct contravention to the US Constitution and its amendments which state:

AMENDMENT I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

AMENDMENT VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and
district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district
shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of
the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the
witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his
defense.

17522. (a) Notwithstanding any other law, if any support obligor is delinquent in the payment of support for at least 30 days and the local child support agency is enforcing the support obligation pursuant to Section 17400, the local child support agency may collect the delinquency or enforce any lien by levy served on all persons having in their possession, or who will have in their possession or under their control, any credits or personal property belonging to the delinquent support obligor, or who owe any debt to the obligor at the time they receive the notice of levy.

AMENDMENT V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury,
except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor
shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in
jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case
to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be
taken for public use without just compensation.

horizontal rule

http://www.1upinfo.com/country-guide-study/algeria/algeria68.html
Algeria

Family Code

The real battleground over the status and rights of women has been the family code, a set of legal provisions regulating marriage and the family. Debated between those who wanted family life organized along Western secularist lines and those who favored a family structure conforming to Islamic principles and ethics, the code was proposed, discussed, and shelved at least three times over a period of two decades before being adopted into law in 1984. In one instance, in 1981, the code's provisions provoked vehement opposition from female members of the National People's Assembly and street demonstrations by women in Algiers, both almost unprecedented events in Algeria.

Although some of the 1984 code's provisions are more liberal than those of the 1981 version, the code essentially reflects the influence of Islamic conservatives. The family unit is "the basic unit of society"; the head of the family is the husband, to whom the wife owes obedience. According to the sharia, a Muslim woman may not marry a non-Muslim; polygyny is permitted under certain conditions (although it is rarely practiced); and women do not inherit property equally with men. A woman cannot be married without her consent, and she may sue for divorce in specified circumstances, including desertion and nonsupport. Custody of children under age seven in divorce cases passes to the wife but reverts to the husband when the children are older. Divorce rates have risen steadily since independence, but divorce remains much easier for men than for women.

Data as of December 1993

horizontal rule

RETAKING AMERICA RADIO SHOW on WELJ- 90.9FM
with host Kelly McGinley
12-1 central time Mon. - Fri. or
listen live 24 hours on the Internet @
www.retakingamerica.com
Call us toll free at 866-2RETAKE-(866-273-8253)
or in the Mobile area at 251-342-1360
email me @retakingamerica@aol.com

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge."  Hosea 4:6a


Dear Listener's and Supporter's:

Well as most of you already know, Chief Justice Roy Moore's trial is tomorrow Wednesday, November 12, 2003.  Please be in much prayer for this trial.   The Re-Taking America team will be leaving this afternoon for Montgomery.  Kelly has filed another lawuit as of yesterday,  because the
Court of Judiciary is unconstitutional and it was not in our 1901 Alabama constitution and it was deceptfully put in 1973 without a vote of the people.  I hope that you have made calls to the members of the Court of Judiciary to let them know that we want our 1st amendment held up and that we do not want our election of Chief Justice Roy Moore overturned.  There is an Alabama Save The Ten Commandment Rally in Mobile today, Tuesday, November 11, 2003.  The rally will be at First Baptist Church of Tillman's Corner, 5660 Three Notch Road, Mobile, Alabama. 

4:30 p.m. Pastor's Briefing
5:30 p.m. News Conference
6:30 P.M. Prayer Rally

I hope that you will make plans to attend this rally.  You may also plan to come to Montgomery and make a stand outside the Alabama Judicial Building, 300 Dexter Avenue, where the trial will be held.  They are only allowing 200 people in, but they are calling for those to come and make a stand outside the building in support and to pray!  In Montgomery, Alabama on Wednesday, November 12, 2003:

8:00 a.m. News Conference Alabama Judicial Building
                                                 300 Dexter Avenue
2:00 p.m. Pastors Briefing Taylor Road Baptist Church
                                             1685 Taylor Road
4:00 p.m. News Conference Alabama Judicial Building
6:30 p.m. Prayer Rally Heritage Baptist Church
                                      1849 Perry Hill Road

You might be asking "What can I do to help in this battle of Truth?"  You may be one that can pray, or you may be one that can come to Montgomery and make a stand, or you may be one that can help financially.  If you like what Re-taking America stands for -TRUTH, please prayerfully consider supporting our cause!

Re-Taking America
P.O. Box 160094
Mobile, AL  36616-0094

"All that is necessary for the forces of evil to win in the world is for enough good men to do nothing."   Edmund Burke



God Bless You In Learning the Truth!
Kelly McGinley

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party