Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

The modern day Galileos are beginning to have their
day with the public. Thank God for the internet.

                                              Scott




--- "Thomas R. Ascher" <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose>
wrote:

> From: "Thomas R. Ascher"
> <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose>
> To: "AB" <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose >
> Subject: Fw: The Nonexistent �Auschwitz Gas
> Chambers� of Debor
> ah Lipstadt and Robert Jan van Pelt,  Part II
> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:16:21 -0700
>
>
> UH OH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: <http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose>
> Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 21:54:28 EST
> To: <undisclosed-recipients:;>
> Subject: The Nonexistent �Auschwitz Gas Chambers� of
> Deborah Lipstadt and
> Robert Jan van Pelt, Part II
>
> Dear Michael,
>
>
> The importance of the article is this.  Even if we
> give the
> Exterminationists
> the benefit of the doubt and assume what they say
> about the operation of the
> "gas chambers" is 100% correct, they still present
> us with an impossible
> scenario.  This article is one more nail in the
> coffin of the Holocaust
> ideology.
>
>
> Paul Grubach
> http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose
>
>
> START:
>
> March 2006
>
> The Nonexistent �Auschwitz Gas Chambers� of Deborah
> Lipstadt and Robert Jan
> van Pelt, Part II
>
> By Paul Grubach  
>
> Preliminary note: This essay is dedicated to
> Holocaust revisionist scholar
> Dr. Robert Faurisson.  He was the first to point out
> the chemical and
> toxicological impossibility of these Auschwitz gas
> chamber stories.
>
> Section one
>
> In early 2005, Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt
> published her widely
> admired History on Trial: My Day in Court with David
> Irving.1  The book is
> her
> version of events surrounding the high-profile, 2000
> libel trial in which
> British
> historian David Irving sued Lipstadt for labeling
> him a �Holocaust denier.�
> During the duration of the trial, the media
> spotlight fell upon the ongoing
> battle between revisionist and traditional views of
> the Jewish tragedy
> during
> W.W.II.  In her publication, she put forth in
> laymen's terms that everyone
> could understand, straightforward reasons as to why
> one should reject
> Holocaust
> revisionist theories and accept the existence of the
> homicidal Auschwitz gas
> chambers.
>
> In Part I of this two part series, we rebutted a
> portion of Lipstadt�s
> critique of Fred Leuchter, the American gas chamber
> expert who carried out
> the first
> ever forensic study of the alleged Auschwitz gas
> chambers.  We saw that,
> although Leuchter�s pioneering report had its
> shortcomings, its findings
> were essen
> tially corroborated by the more thorough and
> exacting scientific study of
> the
> former Max Planck Institute chemistry doctoral
> candidate, Germar Rudolf.
>
> Both reports found only minuscule traces of hydrogen
> cyanide gas (HCN)
> residue in samples taken from the walls and floors
> of the alleged homicidal
> Auschwitz gas chambers.  Yet, very large amounts of
> HCN residue were found
> in samples
> taken from the non-homicidal disinfestation
> chambers, where HCN was used
> only
> to delouse mattresses, clothing and other
> belongings.  If the structures in
> question were actually used as homicidal gas
> chambers, one would expect to
> find
> a considerable HCN residue buildup, somewhat
> comparable to that found in the
> non-homicidal disinfestation chambers.  In both
> reports the conclusions are
> the
> same.  The alleged homicidal gas chambers never
> existed.
>
> Here in Part II, we will examine the technique and
> operation of the alleged
> Auschwitz gas chambers as put forth by Professor
> Lipstadt and one of her
> main
> expert witnesses, Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt, and then
> ask the questions: �Is
> this
> scientifically possible?SDid the gas chambers ever
> exist?�
>
> Section II
>
> In her attempt to prove that the Auschwitz gas
> chambers existed, Lipstadt
> critiques the report of Holocaust revisionist and
> gas chamber expert
> Leuchter.  
> �Had Irving done some research,� she writes, �he
> might have discovered
> Leuchter�s mistaken assumption that it took 3,200
> parts of HCN per million
> to kill
> humans, when in fact it took far less.  On the basis
> of this wrong
> calculation,
> Leuchter had contended that the residue from such a
> large amount of gas
> [would
> have necessitated that] the Sonderkommandos bodies
> chambers.�2
>
> In order to give the reader the appropriate
> perspective, let us recreate
> Lipstadt�s scenario.  The intended victims (one to
> two thousand) were jammed
> into
> the gas chamber.  The deadly hydrogen cyanide was
> circulated throughout the
> chamber, and the victims were murdered.  The
> ventilation systems removed the
> residual HCN.  Now it was time for the inmates to go
> into the chamber and
> remove
> the bodies for cremation.  She asserts that it was
> wrong for Leuchter to
> claim
> that the Sonderkommandos would have had to wait
> twenty-four hours before
> entering the chamber.  This claim and others were
> wrong, Lipstadt insists,
> �because it actually took only 10 percent of what
> Leuchter had assumed was
> necessary
> to kill humans.�    She claims this is Leuchter�s
> fundamental mistake<�the
> assumption that it took far more gas to kill humans
> than to kill vermin,
> when,
> in fact, the reverse was true."3
>
> Simply put, much more gas was used in a
> non-homicidal disinfestation than in
> a homicidal gassing.4
>
> The assertions of the late Jean-Claude Pressac--a
> widely respected expert on
> the Auschwitz gas chambers whose work attempted to
> refute the Holocaust
> revisionists--undermines Lipstadt.  Pressac claimed
> that 12 to 20 grams per
> cubic
> meter is the concentration of the HCN allegedly used
> in a homicidal gassing,
> while 2 to 5 grams per cubic meter was the
> concentration used in a
> non-homicidal
> disinfestation/delousing.5  Contradicting Lipstadt,
> Pressac is claiming that
> a
> greater gas concentration would have been used to
> kill humans than that ne
> eded to kill vermin in a delousing.  Once again,
> Pressac�s claim contradicts
> Lipstadt, which suggests that she and her fellow
> promoters of the Holocaust
> ideology change their story according to the
> propaganda needs of the moment.
>
> Enter Dr. Robert Jan van Pelt, a professor of
> architecture at the University
> of Waterloo, Canada.  He is widely considered to be
> the foremost expert on
> the
> technique and operation of the alleged Auschwitz gas
> chambers.  In
> connection
> with the defense of Professor Lipstadt at the
> Irving-Lipstadt libel trial in
> London from January to April 2000, van Pelt
> testified as an expert witness
> on
> these alleged instruments of mass murder.  It is
> readily apparent that
> Lipstadt relies heavily on the work of van Pelt in
> her attempt to prove the
> existence
> of the Auschwitz gas chambers.  So, any critique of
> Lipstadt�s theories must
> also be a critique of van Pelt.
>
> In his magnum opus, van Pelt makes three important
> claims in regard to the
> technique and operation of the homicidal gas
> chambers.  First, most of the
> deadly hydrogen cyanide gas released into the
> chamber was absorbed by the
> victims�
> bodies.  
>
> Contradicting Holocaust revisionist claims, he
> insists that the ventilation
> systems of the gas chambers were efficient enough to
> remove virtually all of
> the remaining HCN after a mass gassing so that the
> Sonderkommandos could
> enter
> the chambers within a very short time after the
> death of all of the victims
> in
> order to do their work.  In van Pelt�s own words:
> �The situation in the gas
> chambers was different.  With its powerful
> ventilation system and with the
> fact
> that most of the hydrogen cyanide was absorbed by
> the victims� bodies, the
> time [needed to ventilate the gas chambers so the
> Sonderkommandos could
> safely
> enter them to remove the bodies] could be reduced to
> twenty minutes.�6
>
> Finally, he claims that David Olere, a French-Jewish
> deportee to Auschwitz
> in
> 1943, is one of the most important eyewitnesses to
> the operation of the gas
> chambers.  In his own words, the sketches of Olere
> �provide a very important
> visual record of the design and operation of the gas
> chamber and
> incinerators of
> Crematorium 3S�7  Indeed, throughout his entire
> study he attempts to
> demonstrate that Olere is a credible eyewitness by
> showing how his sketches
> are
> consistent with physical evidence.
>
> Jean-Claude Pressac also claimed that the drawings
> of Olere that will be
> examined in this article are an important visual
> record of the operation of
> the
> homicidal gas chambers.8  And last but not least,
> Deborah Lipstadt attempts
> to
> convince her readership that Olere is a credible
> eyewitness by showing how
> his
> claims are consistent with the physical evidence.
> In this regard, she
> refers
> to the �drawings by Sonderkommando  David Olere,
> who, upon liberation
> sketched
> the gas chambers.  
>
> The sketches, Robert Jan [van Pelt] noted, were
> fully corroborated by the
> architectural plans in the Auschwitz Central
> Construction Office and the
> aerial
> photos.�9
>
> Thus, Lipstadt, Pressac and van Pelt claim that
> Olere is perhaps the most
> important eyewitness to the alleged mass gassings,
> and his sketches,
> paintings
> and drawings provide the world with an accurate
> description of the technique
> and
> operation of the Auschwitz gas chambers.  But is
> this so?  Professor van
> Pelt�s omission and inclusion suggest otherwise.
>
> Let us begin with van Pelt�s omission.  In his book
> van Pelt published some
> of Olere�s more important sketches regarding the
> structure and operation of
> the
> alleged gas chambers, but failed to include one of
> his most important
> drawings.  It is the painting showing the
> Sonderkommmandos opening the gas
> chamber
> door and pulling the bodies out after a mass
> gassing.  In the painting, the
> inmates are shirtless, and they are not wearing any
> gas masks, rubber gloves
> or
> protective suits.  Before proceeding, the reader is
> strongly urged to view
> and
> study the sketch in question.  It is online at the
> address in this footnote.
> Scroll down to �Document 30.�10
>
> Pressac includes this painting in his book because
> it allegedly is an
> important visual record of the operation of the gas
> chambers.  In regard to
> this
> matter, he wrote: �The fragment of furnace shown on
> the left, beyond the two
> arrows, is purely symbolic (there was no furnace in
> the basement) and spoils
> a
> scene which would have been irreproachable without
> this addition Oto make it
> better.��  Pressac is clearly saying that this
> sketch is an accurate picture
> of
> what happened, even though it does contain one
> purely symbolic item.11
>
> This is a strange omission on the part of van Pelt.
> That is to say, he
> writes
> a book about the operation of the gas chambers, yet
> omits to include a
> sketch
> of �how-it-really-happened.�  For here we have an
> alleged sketch of
> �how-it-really-was� after a mass gassing, when the
> Sonderkommandos watch
> and supervision of Nazi guards--opened the door of
> the gas chamber to remove
> the
> victims
>
> Perhaps one reason that van Pelt failed to include
> this most important
> sketch
> is because he may have realized it could not have
> happened the way Olere
> claimed it did.  Herewith.
>
> Authoritative industrial sources confirm the extreme
> danger surrounding the
> use of HCN.  Poisoning can easily occur by
> inhalation or skin absorption.12
>
> Leuchter spoke of the dangers surrounding the
> handling of just one (!)
> victim
> that was poisoned by HCN in a gas chamber: �You go
> in.  The inmate has to be
> completely washed down with chlorine bleach or with
> ammonia.  The poison
> exudes right out through his skin.  And if you gave
> the body to an
> undertaker,
> you�d kill the undertaker.  You�ve got to go in;
> you�ve got to completely
> wash
> the body.�13
>
> Bill Armontrout, expert witness at the second Ernst
> Zundel trial in Toronto
> and warden of the Missouri State Penitentiary, which
> includes an execution
> gas
> chamber, confirms the danger: �One of the things
> that cyanide gas does, it
> goes in the pores of your skin.  You hose the body
> down, see.  You have to
> use
> rubber gloves, and you hose the body down to
> decontaminate it before you do
> anything [else].�14
>
> In his capacity as warden, Armontrout was personally
> responsible for
> carrying
> out executions by the use of cyanide gas, and he was
> accepted as an expert
> witness in a court that was hostile to Holocaust
> revisionism.15
>
> Armontrout revealed to the Toronto court the safety
> precautions necessary to
> prevent those who handled the dead criminal's body
> from being poisoned by
> the
> deadly HCN themselves: �The ventilation fan ran for
> approximately one hour
> before two officers equipped with Scott air-packs
> (self-contained breathing
> apparatus which firemen use to enter smoke-filled
> buildings) opened the
> hatch of
> the gas chamber and removed the lead bucket
> containing the cyanide residue.
> The
> two officers wore rubberized disposable clothing and
> long rubber gloves.
> They
> hosed down the condemned man's body in the chair,
> paying particular
> attention
> to the hair and the clothing because of the cyanide
> residue, then removed
> him
> and placed him on a gurney where further
> decontamination took place.�16
>
> Real life tragic incidents corroborate Leuchter�s
> and Armontrout�s claims.
>
> Twenty-three year-old Scott Dominguez descended into
> a tank that once held
> hydrogen cyanide, and later phosphoric acid, in
> order to clean it. When this
> unfortunate worker began chipping away at the
> chemical film and hosing it
> down
> with water, hydrogen cyanide gas was produced.
>
> Just like the workers in Olere's drawings who
> supposedly removed the corpses
> from the Auschwitz gas chambers or the hair and gold
> from the teeth of
> gassed
> victims, Mr. Dominguez was not working with any
> safety equipment--no gas
> mask
> or protective suit. He was overcome by the HCN and
> had to be carried away by
> emergency firefighters. This hapless man suffers
> from permanent brain damage
> because of his exposure to HCN.17
>
> Another tragic incident involving firemen during a
> rescue operation further
> supports Leuchter�s and Armontrout�s assertions.  In
> June 1995, there was a
> dramatic accident in a cave in the French city of
> Monterolier.  Three
> children
> lit a fire in a cave, and threw an unexploded bomb
> they found from W.W.I
> that
> contained hydrogen cyanide gas into the fire.  The
> bomb exploded and
> released
> the deadly HCN.  It killed the children and also
> four firemen that came to
> the
> rescue.  According to a Professor of Physical
> Chemistry, Louis Soulie, the
> deaths of the children and firemen, and even the
> fireman who was wearing a
> gas
> mask, were due to the fact that hydrogen cyanide
> dissolves in the sweat and
> penetrates the body through the skin, where it
> causes poisoning.18
>
> Let us repeat: One French fireman was wearing a gas
> mask, but he perished
> because the HCN dissolved in his sweat and
> penetrated his body.  Even six
> days
> after their deaths, a cyanide concentration twice as
> high as the lethal dose
> was
> detected in the blood of the corpses.19
>
> Finally, there is the incident of suicide by cyanide
> poisoning that took
> place at Grinnell College, Iowa.  A student
> committed suicide by swallowing
> so
> much potassium cyanide that the fumes from his body
> sickened nine people,
> all of
> whom had to be taken to a hospital.  The potassium
> cyanide reacted with the
> water in his body to produce cyanide gas.  The fumes
> that emitted from his
> body
> were so disturbing, that the residence hall where
> the tragic incident took
> place, and the hospital where the student's body was
> taken, had to be aired
> out.20  Keep in mind these are fumes that exuded
> from just one body.
> Imagine the
> fumes exuding from one to two thousand bodies that
> were allegedly poisoned
> by
> HCN in the Auschwitz gas chambers!
>
> In order to give the reader the appropriate
> perspective, let us recreate van
> Pelt�s alleged scenario.  The intended victims (one
> to two thousand) were
> jammed into the gas chamber.  The deadly hydrogen
> cyanide was circulated
> throughout the chamber, and the victims were
> murdered.  The victims� bodies
> absorbed
> the vast majority of the deadly gas and
> lungs of the victims.  The ventilation systems
> quickly removed the residual
> HCN.
>  Now it was time for the inmates to go into the
> chamber and remove the dead
> bodies for cremation.
>
> Once again, let us give van Pelt the benefit of the
> doubt bodies absorbed the vast majority of the
> deadly HCN gas.  Here we have over
> one
> thousand dead bodies being saturated with deadly HCN
> hair,
> noses, mouths, on their skin, in their lungs.  As
> Bill Armontrout points
> out,
> the HCN exudes from the victims' bodies.
>
> The Sonderkommandos enter the gas chamber to remove
> the bodies.  According
> to
> one of van Pelt�s most important eyewitnesses, David
> Olere, the inmates who
> removed the bodies from the chambers wore no gas
> masks, protective suits or
> rubber gloves to protect them from the inhalation or
> skin absorption of HCN.
> They did not even have shirts on!
>
> The heavy labor of removing the thousand bodies from
> the chambers causes the
> Sonderkommandos to sweat.  People who are sweating
> are even more prone to
> absorb the deadly HCN through the skin.
>
> As the evidence points out, the victims' bodies
> exude the deadly HCN why the body of someone who has
> died from HCN poisoning must be hosed down
> and
> rigorously decontaminated.   In neither Pressac�s
> nor van Pelt�s
> authoritative tomes is there any mention that each
> victim�s body was hosed
> down and
> thoroughly decontaminated after a mass gassing, nor
> is this process included
> in any
> of Olere�s �true-to-life� sketches.
>
> We return to the operation of the gas chambers.  The
> Sonderkommandos enter
> the chambers to remove the bodies.  They perspire
> because of the hard labor.
> This makes them even more prone to absorb the deadly
> HCN gas that exudes
> from
> the mass of dead bodies in the gas chamber.  As
> Professor Soulie points out,
> the
> firemen died from HCN absorbed by their sweat, even
> though one of them was
> wearing a gas mask.  Dr. van Pelt�s most important
> eyewitness, David Olere,
> claims in his sketches that the Sonderkommandos were
> shirtless and they wore
> no
> rubber gloves, nor did they wear any gas masks.
> This makes them extremely
> prone
> to HCN poisoning by way of skin absorption and
> inhalation.
>
> As we saw in the incident of the suicidal student
> from Grinnell College, the
> fumes from just one body were toxic enough to cause
> nine people to go to the
> hospital.  Imagine the toxicological impact of one
> to two thousand dead
> bodies,
> all exuding the deadly HCN, upon the Sonderkommandos
> and Nazi guards who
> were
> wearing no gas masks or protective suits.  It would
> have been overwhelming!
>
> Thus, the important sketch of Lipstadt and van
> Pelt�s most important
> eyewitness, David Olere, contains a chemical and
> toxicological
> impossibility.  
> Although his discussion of this matter is somewhat
> vague, van Pelt seems to
> implicitly realize that the Sonderkommandos would
> have--at the very least!--
> needed gas
> masks to enter the gas chamber after they opened the
> door to remove the
> bodies.21  In this particular sketch, the inmates
> removing the bodies and
> the Nazi
> guards supervising those executions are not wearing
> any gas masks. The
> inmates
> dragging the dead bodies are even shirtless!
>
> Perhaps this is the reason that van Pelt failed to
> publish this most
> important drawing of Olere.  He may have realized
> that the sketch of his
> most
> important eyewitness to the operation of the gas
> chambers contained a
> physical
> impossibility.  In other words, he may not have
> published this most
> important sketch
> because he did not want to give Holocaust
> revisionists ammunition to use
> against the Auschwitz gas chamber story.
>
> But it gets even worse for Lipstadt and van Pelt.
> Let us now turn to a
> sketch of David Olere that van Pelt did include in
> his book shows
> the Sonderkommandos inside of the gas chamber after
> a gassing collecting the
> hair and gold teeth.  Alongside of the
> Sonderkommandos is a Nazi guard, only
> part of his leg and jackboot showing.  Once again,
> the Sonderkommandos are
> not
> wearing any gas masks, rubber gloves, or protective
> suits to protect them
> from
> the deadly HCN that would have exuded from the
> bodies of the over one
> thousand
> victims.  Before proceeding, the reader is strongly
> urged to view and study
> the sketch under discussion.  It is online at the
> address in this
> footnote.22  
>
> We return to the assertions of the expert witness,
> warden Bill Armontrout.
> The body of a gassed criminal is hosed down and
> decontaminated, and
> especially
> close attention is paid to the hair, as it is here
> that much of the deadly
> HCN
> collects.  Yet, in Olere�s sketch, we see the
> Sonderkommandos gloves, gas masks or protective
> suits pile of victims!  
>
> Remember, van Pelt claims that the vast majority of
> the deadly gas was
> absorbed by the victims� bodies victims
> and ultimately kill the Sonderkommandos who
> collected the hair and gold
> teeth!   Nowhere in van Pelt�s tome is it mentioned
> that each and every body
> was
> hosed down and decontaminated before the hair and
> gold in the teeth were
> removed.  Nor does the �how-it-really-happened�
> sketch of Olere show the
> Sonderkommandos decontaminating each
> and every body, which would have been necessary to
> prevent poisoning from
> the
> ocean of deadly HCN that would have exuded from the
> over one thousand dead
> bodies.    
>
> We return to Lipstadt.  She is saying that because
> only 320 parts per
> million
> (10% of what Leuchter claimed) was necessary to kill
> humans, the ventilation
> systems could have removed the residual gas quickly,
> and the inmates could
> have entered the chambers a very short time after
> the homicidal gassings to
> remove the victims for cremation.  All would have
> run relatively smoothly.
>
> Dr. van Pelt claims that 300 parts per million of
> HCN is lethal to humans,
> and allegedly, this is the concentration the Nazis
> used in the gas
> chambers.23  
> The 300 parts per million necessary to kill humans
> is a little less than the
> Lipstadt�s threshold of 320 parts per million.  This
> suggests that even
> small
> amounts of gas that would have exuded from the skin,
> nose, mouth, and hair
> of
> one (!) dead body could have killed any
> Sonderkommando, or any of the Nazi
> guards that allegedly supervised those executions.
>
> Even worse for the Lipstadt/van Pelt scenario, the
> amount of HCN exuding
> from
> each of the over one thousand bodies would have, in
> the end, accumulated to
> an ocean of gas to poison both the Sonderkommandos
> and the Nazi guards by
> skin
> absorption or inhalation.
>
> At the risk of sounding redundant, let us again
> recreate the gassing
> scenario
> of Lipstadt and van Pelt in order for the reader to
> clearly understand the
> chemical and toxicological impossibility of the
> operation of the Auschwitz
> gas
> chambers.  One thousand to two thousand victims are
> herded into the gas
> chamber.  The doors are closed, and the deadly HCN
> is circulated throughout
> the
> chamber.  The gas murders the victims.  As van Pelt
> claims, their bodies
> absorb
> most of the gas.  The residual, remaining amount is
> extracted from the
> chamber by
> the powerful ventilation systems.
>
> The door of the gas chamber is opened.  According to
> the most important
> eyewitness, David Olere, the inmates who entered the
> chamber to remove the
> bodies
> for cremation wore no gas masks, rubber gloves or
> protective suits to
> protect
> them from HCN poisoning by way of inhalation or skin
> absorption.  The
> inmates
> that entered the chamber to collect the hair of the
> victims wore no gas
> masks,
> rubber gloves, or protective suits to protect them
> from poisoning by way of
> inhalation or the skin absorption of the deadly HCN.
>  The Nazi guards that
> supervised these executions wore no gas masks or
> protective suits.
>
> The Sonderkommandos are confronted with one to two
> thousand bodies, all
> saturated with deadly HCN.  They do their work with
> no gas masks, rubber
> gloves or
> protective suits.  According to van Pelt, the vast
> majority of the gas was
> absorbed by the victims� bodies, only to exude from
> those same bodies and
> poison
> anyone who was not wearing a gas mask, protective
> suit and rubber gloves.
>
> One of the important points here is this.  Even if
> we give Lipstadt and van
> Pelt the benefit of the doubt, and assume that all
> of their assertions on
> the
> operation of the �gas chambers� are all correct,
> their gas chamber operation
> scenario is still virtually impossible.
>
> If, without gas masks, rubber gloves and protective
> suits, it is extremely
> dangerous to handle just one (!) body saturated with
> the deadly HCN; if only
> one
> dead body saturated with the deadly HCN can exude
> enough toxic fumes to send
> nine people to the hospital, it would be almost
> impossible to handle one to
> two thousand dead bodies saturated with HCN without
> gas masks, protective
> suits
> and rubber gloves.
>
> The inmates in Olere�s sketches that allegedly
> handled those one to two
> thousand dead bodies without gas masks, rubber
> gloves, and protective suits
> would
> have been poisoned by way of inhalation or skin
> absorption.  The physical
> evidence provided by the three examples of HCN
> poisoning incident, the Grinnell College suicide,
> and the children in the cave
> incident important
> eyewitness puts forth an impossible scenario.
>
> It does no good to counter the revisionists by
> saying: �Well, the drawings
> of
> David Olere are just symbolic of what really
> transpired.  He was engaging in
> Oartistic license� when he depicted the
> Sonderkommandos with no gas masks,
> rubber gloves and protective suits.�  If this is so,
> then his sketches are
> not an
> accurate representation of the operation of the gas
> chambers.  And, Dr. van
> Pelt�s claim that Olere�s sketches provide a very
> important visual record of
> the operation of the gas chamber of Crematorium 3 is
> not true.
>
> Furthermore, it does no good to counter the
> revisionists by saying: �Well,
> the Nazis didn�t care about the lives of the
> Sonderkommandos, so they did
> not
> have to use the safety precautions of gas masks,
> protective suits and rubber
> gloves.�  Quite the contrary.  The Nazi guards that
> allegedly supervised
> those
> executions had to make certain that the
> Sonderkommandos quickly removed all
> of
> the bodies to make room for the next batch of
> victims.  Thus, they would
> have
> had to make certain that the inmates stayed alive at
> least long enough to
> �get
> the job done.�  That is, in order for them to stay
> alive long enough to
> complete the job, they would have had to wear gas
> masks and protective
> suits.  
> Furthermore, in order to protect the lives of the
> Nazi guards that allegedly
> supervised those executions, it would have been
> necessary for them to wear
> gas masks
> and protective suits.
>
> Finally, let us assume that what Jean-Claude Pressac
> claimed is the truth.
> The Sonderkommandos that entered the gas chambers
> after a mass gassing wore
> gas
> masks.24  Even if we assume this to be so, the
> �Auschwitz gas chamber� story
> is still impossible.  This still leaves open the
> fact that HCN poisoning can
> occur by skin absorption.  Nowhere in sketches of
> Olere or in the
> authoritative tomes of van Pelt or Pressac is it
> ever claimed that the
> Sonderkommandos
> wore rubber gloves or protective suits to protect
> them from the skin
> absorption
> of the ocean of deadly HCN that would have exuded
> from the myriad of bodies
> in
> the gas chambers.  
>
> The reader is asked to recall the story of the four
> firemen who perished
> from
> the skin absorption of HCN, in spite of the fact
> that one of them was
> wearing
> a gas mask.  The reader should simply consider the
> devastating toxic effect
> upon the Sonderkommandos, all wearing gas masks,
> when they put their bare
> hands
> into the HCN saturated hair and mouths of the over
> one thousand victims.
> Poisoning by skin absorption would have occurred,
> because they never
> decontaminated each body and they wore no protective
> suits or rubber gloves.
>
> What I reveal here is nothing new.  As far back as
> the 1970s, Holocaust
> revisionist scholar Robert Faurisson revealed to the
> world the chemical and
> toxicological impossibility of this Auschwitz gas
> chamber legend.
>
> Ironically, it is, I believe, a very favorable sign
> for the future of
> Holocaust revisionism that most of the Western power
> elites refuse to debate
> the
> Holocaust revisionists, but only resort to name
> calling, threats of career
> destruction and jail sentences.  It suggests to the
> world that Holocaust
> revisionism
> cannot be defeated with evidence and reason.  The
> opponents of revisionism
> are
> intellectually impotent, and they cannot defeat
> revisionism with facts,
> evidence and logic.  The �Holocaust� is a weak and
> flimsy ideology that
> needs
> special laws, threats of career destruction and jail
> sentences to protect
> it.
>
>  
> Footnotes
>
>  
>
> Deborah E. Lipstadt, History on Trial: My Day in
> Court with David Irving
> (HarperCollins Publishers, 2005).
>
> Ibid, p.122.
>
> Ibid, pp. 122, 131.
>
> Ibid. p.36.
>
> Jean-Claude Pressac, Auschwitz: Technique and
> Operation of the Gas Chambers
> (Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, 1989), pp.16, 18, 31.
> Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0011.htm
>
> Robert Jan van Pelt, The Case for Auschwitz:
> Evidence from the Irving Trial
> (Indiana University Press, 2002), p.275.
>
> Ibid, p.173.
>
> Pressac, p. 493.  Scroll down to Documents 30 and
> 31.  Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Lipstadt, p. 140.
>
> Online: http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Pressac, p.493.  Scroll down to Document 30.
> Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Zyklon for Pest Control: Information brochure of the
> German Society for Pest
> Control on the use of its insecticide Zyklon B.  
> Reprinted in Frederick A.
> Leuchter, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf, The
> Leuchter Reports: Critical
> Edition (Theses & Dissertations Press, 2005), pp.
> 75-88.  Online:
> http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/tlr/
>
> Stephen Trombley, The Execution Protocol (Crown
> Publishers, 1992), p.98.
>
> Ibid., p.102.
>
> Barbara Kulaszka, ed., Did Six Million Really Die?:
> Report of the Evidence
> in
> the Canadian OFalse News� Trial of Ernst Zundel<1988
> (Samisdat Publishers,
> 1992), p.351.  Online:
>
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html
>
> Ibid., p.352.  Online:
>
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/dsmrd/dsmrd31armontrout.html
>
> Department of Justice National News Release, 10 May
> 1999.  Reprinted in
> Germar Rudolf, The Rudolf Report: Expert Report on
> Chemical and Technical
> Aspects
> of the OGas Chambers� of Auschwitz (Theses &
> Disserations Press, 2003),
> pp.18-19.  Online:
> http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2.  For a list
> of
> other
> articles on this matter, see the references in
> footnote 20 on p.19 of
> Rudolf.
>
> See the article about this in Rudolf, p.20.  Online:
> http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2
>
> Ibid.
>
> See Rudolf, pp. 17-18.  Minnesota State University,
> Mankato Reporter, Online
> Edition, 10 October 1998, �Suicide fumes sicken nine
> Iowa students.�
> Online:
> http://vho.org/GB/Books/trr/1.html#1.2
>
> Robert Jan van Pelt, p.275.
>
> Pressac, p.493. Scroll down to Document 31.  Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0493.htm
>
> Robert Jan van Pelt, p.362.
>
> Pressac, p.16.  Online:
> http://www.mazal.org/Pressac/Pressac0016.htm
>
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Peace is patriotic!
> Michael Santomauro
> Editorial Director
> 253 West 72nd street #1711
> New York, NY 10023
> http://www.tadp.org/
> Available for Talk-Radio interviews 24hours
> 212-787-7891
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The QUESTION:
> To subscribe and grow with knowledge or
> to unsubscribe and Die Stupid?
> Send an E-mail to:
> http://email.email.secureserver.net/view.php?folder=INBOX&uid=17625#Compose
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party