Thomas Sowell on Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Impeach Ruth Bader Ginzberg "There is no reason to believe that the admission of women capable of all the activities required of VMI cadets would destroy the Institute rather than enhance its capacity to serve the 'more perfect Union'."
"We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the constitution." A. Lincoln
Jeffrey Rose, The New Republic: "If the Court ... enacts the Equal Rights Amendment by judicial fiat, it would transform the legal status of women." Anita K. Blair, Independent Women's Forum, on Justice Ginsburt: "Would a 'truly equal option' for boys, as the Post suggests, cure New York's constitutional problem? Well, what real-world school board would vote to subsidize a program that teaches boys 'self-esteem' and limits their athletics and sports programs to those enjoyed by the girls across the street? Yet, if educators fashioned a parallel program aimed at boys' needs and tried to exclude girls, they would flunk skeptical scrutiny, which disallows any justification based on 'generalizations' about either sex."
Cathy Young on "women have special 'ways of
Editorial in Washington Times: "Here
we now have two of the most eminent legal minds in the country - one of them a Supreme
Court Justice - falling back on that old and utterly unacceptable excuse for wrong
doing: ignorance of the law." Justice Scalia Speaks the Plain Truth: "Today, however,
change is forced upon Virginia, and reversion to single sex education is prohibited
nationwide, not by democratic processes but by order of this Court. Even while bemoaning
the sorry, bygone days of "fixed notions" concerning women's education, see
ante, at 18-19, and n. 10, 20-21, 25-27, the Court favors current notions so fixedly that
it is willing to write them into the Constitution of the United States by application of
custom built 'tests.' This is not the interpretation of a Constitution, but the creation
of one." Northwestern University
judicial ethics specialist Steven Lubet on Justice
Ginsburg:"The statute is pretty clear," Mr. Lubet said after Insight sent him
lists of Mr. Ginsburg's holdings and cases involving those companies. "At least in
some of these cases, it appears that Justice Ginsburg should have disqualified
N.O.W.: VMI now considered "poor
loser" for not giving women special privileges.
At the University of Virginia: ''There's nothing as effective
in sharpening a majority opinion as a good defense. I went through nine drafts. . . . My
original opinion was good, quite good, but much better with Justice Scalia's dissent.''
Women need families, not "equal protection".
Opinion| Survey: Lies or Opinions?| Justice Ginzberg's Background| Syllabus| UVa Speech| Biography| Ginzberg & Gays| Picture| VMI Forum| Dissenting Opinion| Excerpts from Dissenting Opinion| Guestbook| Phyllis Schaffley on VMI
Modified Thursday, May 23, 2013
Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party