Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

xmas3.gif (5351 bytes)

 

Thomas Sowell on Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Impeach Ruth Bader Ginzberg "There is no reason to believe that the admission of women capable of all the activities required of VMI cadets would destroy the Institute rather than enhance its capacity to serve the 'more perfect Union'."  

horizontal rule

 "We, the people, are the rightful masters of both congress and the courts -  not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow men who pervert the constitution." A. Lincoln

Justice Scalia "This is not the interpretation of a Constitution, but the creation of one." Linda Bridges  "... Constitutional law as it is taught and practiced today has nothing to do with the Constitution. It is derived almost entirely from four words of one clause of one amendment: "due process" and "equal protection"." Justice Douglas "... nearly a century after the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted ... discrimination against voters on grounds other than race was struck down."  In other words, the "equal protection" clause of the 14th Amendment was not intended to apply to women when it was written, and it did not apply to them for a century. 
 

 
 

Robert H. Bork:  "That was the reason for the Equal Rights 
Amendment, which provided that it should be primarily the function 
of the judiciary to define and enforce equality between the sexes.The amendment, we were assured, did not mean that no distinctions 
whatever may be made between men and women, that women must, 
for instance, be conscripted for combat duty or that unisex 
bathrooms are required. Yet it was proposed that the Supreme 
Court rather than Congress or the state legislatures make the 
necessarily detailed and sensitive political choices to write a gender 
code for the nation. In that sense, the amendment represented less a 
revolution in sexual equality than a revolution in our attitudes about 
constitutional methods of government." 

Jeffrey Rose, The New Republic: "If the Court ... enacts the Equal Rights Amendment by judicial fiat, it would transform the legal status of women." Anita K. Blair, Independent Women's Forum, on Justice Ginsburt:  "Would a 'truly equal option' for boys, as the Post suggests, cure New York's  constitutional problem? Well, what real-world school board would vote to subsidize a program that teaches boys 'self-esteem' and limits their athletics and sports programs to those enjoyed by the girls across the street? Yet, if educators fashioned a parallel program aimed at boys' needs and tried to exclude girls, they would flunk skeptical scrutiny, which disallows any  justification based on 'generalizations' about either sex."

horizontal rule

Cathy Young on "women have special 'ways of knowing'".

horizontal rule


Tom DeLay on impeaching judges.

horizontal rule


Phyllis Schlafly on VMI The massive government lawsuit against VMI ... was a no-holds-barred fight to feminize VMI waged by the radical feminists and their cohorts in the Federal Government.

bulletOn Impeaching Judges
bulletOn Feminism

horizontal rule

Editorial in Washington Times:  "Here we now have two of the most eminent legal minds in the country - one of them a Supreme Court Justice - falling back on that old and utterly unacceptable excuse for wrong doing: ignorance of the law." Justice Scalia Speaks the Plain Truth:  "Today, however, change is forced upon Virginia, and reversion to single sex education is prohibited nationwide, not by democratic processes but by order of this Court. Even while bemoaning the sorry, bygone days of "fixed notions" concerning women's education, see ante, at 18-19, and n. 10, 20-21, 25-27, the Court favors current notions so fixedly that it is willing to write them into the Constitution of the United States by application of custom built 'tests.' This is not the interpretation of a Constitution, but the creation of one." Northwestern University judicial ethics specialist Steven Lubet on Justice Ginsburg:"The statute is pretty clear," Mr. Lubet said after Insight sent him lists of Mr. Ginsburg's holdings and cases involving those companies. "At least in some of these cases, it appears that Justice Ginsburg should have disqualified herself."
Profile of Ruth Bader Ginzberg The editorial simply focuses on the continued "nanying" of VMI by Judith Keith, the self-appointed VMI-overwatch poster girl of the Justice Department. In the wake of the Supreme Court decision, Keith has bombarded VMI with imperious requests for information which descend to the nth degree of trivia.

horizontal rule


Justice Ginsburg Supports Confiscation of Private Property: With this reasoning (regarding her ruling on confiscation laws) we would still have slavery, police-beating confessions and many other rights violations. Justices Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsberg in their concurring opinions also wrote baffling opinions.  Thomas reasoned that "the federal Constitution does not prohibit everything that is intensely undesirable." Ginsberg said the court was not supporting "an experiment to punish innocent third parties." If this decision does not punish innocent third parties, then what does?

N.O.W.:  VMI now considered "poor loser" for not giving women special privileges.

horizontal rule


Cartoon Guy Waving!ROLL CALL, GUYS!  Wake up.  She rules in favor of gays and against VMI.  Hello.
 

At the University of Virginia: ''There's nothing as effective in sharpening a majority opinion as a good defense. I went through nine drafts. . . . My original opinion was good, quite good, but much better with Justice Scalia's dissent.''

horizontal rule


The Feminist War Against Men -- Robert Rosenthal on Janet Reno, the affirmative action Attorney General

horizontal rule

Federal Impeachment Process
Educating Our Children Why the US ranks at the BOTTOM in math and language education and at the TOP in education spending.

horizontal rule

Women need families, not "equal protection".

horizontal rule

View the Guestbook

 

Opinion| Survey: Lies or Opinions?| Justice Ginzberg's Background| Syllabus| UVa Speech| Biography| Ginzberg & Gays| Picture| VMI Forum| Dissenting Opinion| Excerpts from Dissenting Opinion| Guestbook| Phyllis Schaffley on VMI

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party