The Global Warming Religion

 

 

According to modern science the Earth has been around 4 billion years. During that time we have had massive floods and earthquakes, volcanoes which heated up the entire planet, and ice ages with one as recently as 4,000 years ago.

To walk in at the last second of that lifetime and declare that you KNOW its life is being threatened, based on measurements that were made in less than 0.000000025% of that lifetime, with no way to compare it to the data during the REST of that 4 billion year lifetime, is NOT SCIENCE--it's pure quackery.

It's like walking into the last four seconds of the four hour movie "Gone With the Wind", hearing Brett say "frankly, my dear, I don't give a .amn", and claiming to be an expert on the Civil War.

That's even too conservative. The last 4 seconds of that movie is 0.028% of the movie. The last 100 years of our 4 billion year old planet is 0.0000025% of that lifetime. So to put it  into perspective, you must divide that 4 seconds by 11,200.  Since there were 10 syllables spoken in that four seconds, this works out to 0.09% of a single vowel, so the proper analogy would be that the" theory" of global warming is equivalent to claiming you can become an expert on the Civil War by hearing far less than a single vowel from Brett.

 

Furthermore, we know that most so called scientists LIED about the data, threw out data which didn't fit THEIR curve, lamented in "private" emails [read: PUBLIC as ell], that we were actually experiencing global cooling--and that the polar bears are still there.

Orange County, California, which has enough open land to grow our own food without having to rely on outside sources, as well as to have many state, county, and federal parks, as well as 30 miles of open beach, with a population of 3.15 million and on an area of 948 square miles, has a population density of 985 per square mile. At that population density, Texas with 261,797 square miles, could "house" 257,870,045 people, and Alaska with 571,951 square miles could "house" another 563,371,735 people

At 18,645 people per square mile, Singapore has a population density 19 times greater, so at that rate, Texas could "house" 4.9 billion and Alaska another 10.7 billion, for a total of 15.6 billion, more than twice the current world population. If this many people can be housed into a part of the Earth which is less than 0.5% of the Earth's 197 million square miles, then there is MUCH MORE room for expansion than that Global Warming Religion claims, and there could not possibly be any limit to ANY our our natural resources--not air, not water, not electricity, not gas, and not even trees and polar bears.

On TOP of that, the Earth's atmosphere is 60 miles thick, and almost all the human created pollution is confined to the first one mile of it with no logical explanation for how that much of it could climb to 60 miles. Not even jet aircraft which operate at 7 miles could possibly produce pollution which reaches 60 miles up.

years. During that time we have had massive floods and earthquakes, volcanoes which heated up the entire planet, and ice ages with one as recently as 4,000 years ago.

To walk in at the last second of that lifetime and declare that you KNOW its life is being threatened, based on measurements that were made in less than 0.000000025% of that lifetime, with no way to compare it to the data during the REST of that 4 billion year lifetime, is NOT SCIENCE--it's pure quackery.

It's like walking into the last four seconds of the four hour movie "Gone With the Wind", hearing Brett say "frankly, my dear, I don't give a .amn", and claiming to be an expert on the Civil War.

That's even too conservative. The last 4 seconds of that movie is 0.028% of the movie. The last 100 years of our 4 billion year old planet is 0.000000025% of that lifetime. So to put into perspective, you must divide that 4 seconds by 1.1 million.

Furthermore, we know that most so called scientists LIED about the data, threw out data which didn't fit THEIR curve, lamented in "private" emails [read: PUBLIC as ell], that we were actually experiencing global cooling--and the polar bears are still there.

 




Bart_R  Chr1st1an3 days ago

Red FREAKING herring is a logical fallacy. Try to stick to relevant points of discussion.

Airquotes doesn't make science not science. It just makes for more logical appeal to emotion fallacy. Try to stick to facts and not play on feelings.

The last glaciation finished climbing up to the Holocene warm interglacial 11,000 years ago. You are perhaps citing the date of the end of the Holocene Optimum over 4,000 years ago when temperatures began a cooling slide that took only 100 years of fossil waste dumping to reverse. That makes human influence 40 times stronger than natural.

Your Argumentum ad Ignoratio is not persuasive. It's just more logical fallacy.

And what you do claim to 'know'? Proven false in eight separate inquiries in three countries.

Why do you prefer to embrace lies and fallacy?

I suspect it's because of GLUE: the group you think of yourself as belonging to leading to logical fallacy to hide your ulterior agenda (usually fear, hate or greed), and escalation to counter what you see as an attack on you by information.

Tell us, is it hate, fear or greed?

see more

 




Chr1st1an  Bart_R2 days ago

I think you now hold the record for the largest number of errors and ad hominens packed into one paragraph. Your global warming religion cannot possibly be so important to you that you would insist that my post could only be due to "hate, fear or greed".

Yet you didn't even compliment me for my Gone With the Wind analogy.

Is it because you are not capable of understanding it--just as you're not capable of understanding that my concern is the exact opposite of " hate, fear or greed"?

 




Bart_R  Chr1st1an2 days ago

Be wrong on your own time.

Pay what you owe.

 

Jacob Israel

5:11 AM (5 hours ago)
to me

0.000000025

Divide by 560 mlillion, not 1.1 million

4 seconds / 560 million = 0.0000007 seconds.

= 714 thousand Nanoseconds

A precise comparison would be the last 0.0000007 seconds of Gone With the Wind, not the last 4 seconds.

This would be far less than one vowel from Rhett Butler.