"do american voters really want a president who is afraid to defend himself
against aggressive lies and misrepresentations? that seems to be what these gop
My thoughts exactly.
I'm beginning to hate these putative "Republicans" even more than Democrats.
If you see what Trump ACTUALLY said in the tape of his conversation, he was VERY
complimentary of this prostitute. Even so, what ALL of these CRITICS say about
Trump is a billion times more deplorable to us deplorables, than Trump's tweet
is, much less his original COMPLIMENT.
To me, this completely disqualifies them from uttering one more racist slur.
Not a single one of them EVER said anything about Trump which was even close to
being as complimentary as his PRAISE of former Miss USA who called her "the most
beautiful woman I have ever seen".
She DID get fat just like Hillary did--and Trump's mild criticism doesn't even
begin to address the epidemic of obesity which kills 440 THOUSAND Americans each
year, which Hillary and her supporters [and ALL the mediots] will do EVERYTHING
to ignore and obfuscate. The average American male is now four times as kiley to
die of obesity as an Ethiopian is to die of malnutrition.
Gluttony is A SIN, and this putative Christian nation not only has the First
Amendment Right to Political Free Speech to call a fat person FAT, an ugly woman
UGLY, and a glutton a sinner, but more importantly we have a DUTY to do our .amnest
to eliminate this scourge on humanity (or at least on Americans), something we
will never let political correctness get in the way of stopping.
How Dyslexic Can Women Voters Get?
How dyslexic it is for so many American women to claim that they will vote
for a woman who protected a serial rapist for decades because she will now morph
into something that will finally do something positive for women.
If you love to be serially raped in every way, she's your gal.
Even the most avid Trump HATERS are confronted with ONLY these two "FACTS"?
1) That when Hillary claimed that she never even saw the national security
agreement that we now know her own signature is on, that she was lying?
2) That when Hillary claimed that she never even saw the national security
agreement that we now know her own signature is on, that she didn't even know
what she was signing (much less did she appreciate the tremendous danger of
placing her signature on such a vital document, much less that this made her
patently unqualified to hold any office, much less did she understand that her
word is her bond).
BUT there is a third and far more sinister and far more damaging scenario to
our national security than even this: that the FBI issued her a security
clearance that virtually no congressmen and very few presidents would have been
able to qualify for. And that IF Bill Clinton actually ever did get such a
security clearance, that when he was impeached for lying to Congress, that
clearance was revoked just as easily as and even quicker than his license to
practice law was revoked. And that the spouse of one who lost his security
clearance in such an infamous (and unprecedented) scandal, should NEVER HERSELF
even be considered for a national security clearance. Only this explains the
quixotic and lacadasical and amazingly slow response by the FBI to date: we are
asking them to indict themselves.
1.000 Reason Hillary Was DENIED a Security Clearance
There are more than one thousand PUBLICLY KNOWN reasons that the FBI should
never have granted the security clearance that the FBI now claims that her very
own signature is on--the one she claims she never signed, much less ever saw,
much less understood, much less ever agreed to obey or abide by.
So who's lying here? Either Hillary is lying, or the FBI is lying. We can't
just chalk this up to some undisclosed--OR MORE PROPERLY, actively
concealed--mental problem Hillary has with her memory as her supporters now seek
to do--our national security is AT STAKE.
it's not impossible that it's the FBI who is lying. It's entirely possible
that someone got her to sign such an important document without disclosing to
her what the documents are--my own wife does such things. it's not impossible
that someone forged her signature--a very good reason for the FBI to refuse to
What IS impossible is that a woman who just proved that she CAN remember her
lines in a debate watched by85 to 100 million deplorables, and who had the
stamina to visit hundreds of countries and threw her signature all over the
planet, SIMPLY FORGOT what a national Security Agreement is--much less how her
signature got on it.
A security clearance can and will be denied for almost all the rest of us
deplorables for reasons far less serious than her one thousand crimes. Mine was
almost denied because I failed to disclose a chance meeting i had at the Korean
DMZ WITH A Chechoslovakian Army Colonel because he might have been a 'communist'
and any and all meetings like that must be reported immediately. The fact that
it happened when i was a civilian, a decade before, made no difference.
IT WAS DENIED
did not complete the highest level of security training required by the
State Department for proper handling of the government's most secret documents,
according to information obtained under the Freedom of Information Act by The
Daily Caller News Foundation.
The State Department released 46 pages of documents that detailed information
from when Clinton joined the State Department as secretary of state in 2009.
There are no documents that show Clinton completed the SCI training course, but
documents show that two of her top aides did.
A document signed by Clinton's chief of staff at the time Cheryl Mills and
deputy chief Huma Abedin showed they both completed training on handling
"Special Compartmented Information" when they joined the department. Mills and
Abedin signed documents on Jan. 29 and 30 that showed they "Completed SCI
Classified documents in the SCI category cover the nation's highest guarded
secrets, including material gained through intelligence operations including
"human assets," spies who are embedded in foreign governments.
The Daily Caller said it made the Freedom of Information Act request because of
the investigation into Clinton's handling of classified information when she was
secretary of state.
Retired Col. Jim Waurishuk, former U.S. Central Command deputy director for
intelligence, said it's standard to get training done when an official takes
"It's hard to believe, particularly as it was her first year in office as
secretary of state. The standard process is you will get all your security
indoctrination done immediately upon taking office," Waurishuk said.
"I don't care if you're a GS-1 or a private or a four-star general or President
of the United States. You're going to go through your security indoctrination,
particularly in the position of secretary of state."
Only authorized individuals can view SCI documents, and then only in a "Special
Compartmented Information Facility." All smartphones, audio and video recorders,
personal laptops, hard drives, writable CDs, MP3 players, and iPods are banned
in the facility.
Hillary "Fact Checker"
Bull shit piled higher and deeper
Fox News has never EVER dared to let their media whores let a single TRUTH about
Trump pass by their lugubrious lips.
To cover their previous LIES they make more lies out of whole cloth, and then
spin ever more lies, until they are so wound up in their underwear that their
eyes are literally bulging out when TRUTH finally slams them into cognitive
Not a single one of them understands Trump, much less economics, much less how
to "fact check" his FACTUAL statements.
simple FACT according to the obamabation web site itself that there are FIVE
U.S. cities whose murder rates have consistently exceeded 82 murders per 100,000
population PER YEAR, which makes the "war" in Iraq about as dangerous as a girl
scout cookie. Out of 300,000 soldiers, over 23 years, we have OFFICIALLY lost a
total of around 4,000 soldiers--an annual rate per 100,000 of 58.
A resident of Democrat controlled D.C. (or Detroit or Compton or New Orleans or
Gary) is 42% more likely to be brutally murdered than a soldier is to die on the
battlefield in Iraq.
Black Lives Matter? Then Why not DO SOMETHING about it?
Since young American Black males are 100 to 1,000
times more likely to be murdered than just about any
other demographic group, IF BLM did care about
Blacks, they would demand that their murderers be
brought to justice, not given a million excuses like
he first presidential debate took place Monday night at Hofstra University in
Hempstead, New York. Who do you think came out on top?
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Hillary Clinton
tops the list of "anti" candidates in a poll that asks Americans who
they would most want to keep out of the White House, The Washington Times
reported on Tuesday.
more stories like
Forty-percent of Americans said they would vote against Clinton, a New York
Democrat, according to a Fox 5-The Washington Times-Rasmussen Reports poll.
Clinton scored more than twice the total of the No. 2 "anti"
pick, Republican Rudy Giuliani, the former New York mayor.
"Hillary Clinton is better known than any (other) presidential
candidate on either side. She has a lot of people who love her and a lot of
people who hate her" said pollster Scott Rasmussen.
Sixty-four percent of Republicans and more than half of adult men under 40
said they would use their vote against Clinton, the poll found.
Giuliani drew the strongest opposition from Democrats, with 30 percent saying
they would vote to bar him from the presidency, according to the poll.
Among the other candidates, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama also scored
double-digit opposition with 11 percent saying they would consider using their
vote against him, The Washington Times said.
Republican Mitt Romney, a former Massachusetts governor, rounded out the
leading "anti" candidates with seven percent opposition, the survey
The poll of 1,000 adults, taken December 11 to 12, has a margin of error of
five percentage points.
) Copyright 2007 Reuters. Reuters co
Hillary Directed Waco
There are NO Statutes of Limitations on MURDER!
Saturday Feb. 10, 2001; 11:32 a.m. EST
Tripp: Hillary Directed Waco, Bill Abused Monica
Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vince Foster to resolve the 1993 Waco
stand-off in a move that led to the deaths of more than 80 men, women and
children, former White House aide Linda Tripp charged in an interview Friday
Tripp also alleged that Monica Lewinsky was more of a victim of Bill Clinton's
sexual predations than the former White House intern has publicly acknowledged.
Appearing on CNN's Larry King Live, Tripp suggested that Foster, at Mrs.
Clinton's direction, transmitted the order to move on the Branch Davidian's
Waco compound, which culminated in a military-style tear gas attack on the
The compound burst into flames hours later as federal troops used a U.S. Army
tank to ram the building and insert flammable gas.
Tripp described Foster's demeanor as "dignified, decent, caring,
smart" during his early days at the White House. But when Waco happened,
she said, "that's when I first knew that Vince was falling apart."
Foster was found shot to death in a Virginia park three months later.
Tripp said she was with the former deputy White House counsel when the news of
the Waco assault broke on television.
"A special bulletin came on showing the atrocity at Waco and the children.
And his face, his whole body slumped, and his face turned white, and he was
absolutely crushed knowing, knowing the part he had played."
"And he had played the part at Mrs. Clinton's direction," charged
Tripp was stunned by the contrast between Foster's heartfelt emotion at the
Waco tragedy and what she observed from Mrs. Clinton.
"Her reaction, on the other hand, was heartless," Tripp told King,
adding, "I can only tell you what I saw."
When asked how the decision to move on Waco was transmitted, Tripp said,
"Foster, Mrs. Clinton, (deputy Attorney General) Webb Hubbell, (Attorney
General) Janet Reno."
Tripp's new charge corroborates allegations first leveled in the 1999
documentary on the deadly confrontation, "Waco: A New Revelation."
In the film, director Michael McNulty included the account of former House Waco
investigator T. March Bell.
"One of the interesting things that happens in an investigation is that
you get anonymous phone calls," Bell explains in the film.
"And we in fact received anonymous phone calls from Justice Department
managers and attorneys who believe that pressure was placed on Janet Reno by
Webb Hubbell, and pressure that came from the first lady of the United
At the film's premier, Bell told NewsMax.com that phone logs obtained by House
investigators indicated that Mrs. Clinton, Foster and Hubbell worked on Waco
"Those phone logs were Webb Hubbell's phone logs. There were calls from
the first lady and Vince Foster to Webb Hubbell's office" during the Waco
crisis, he said.
Bell said Mrs. Clinton grew more and more impatient as the Waco standoff came
to dominate the headlines during the early months of the Clinton
administration. It was she, Bell's source claims, who pressured a reluctant
Janet Reno to act.
Reno, on the other hand, was not enthusiastic about launching the assault, said
Bell. "Give me a reason not to do this," she is said to have begged
In another explosive revelation, Tripp charged that the president's relationship
with Monica Lewinsky included an element of abuse.
"This was abuse of a child," she told King. "Don't ever believe
that this was consensual sex. And [Clinton] went to extraordinary lengths to
cover that up.
The former White House insider said that the-then 21-year-old Lewinsky was
"a mixed-up, unstable, volatile child," who became emotionally
overwhelmed by her involvement with Clinton.
"Monica is 21 going on 14 on a good day," Tripp said.
In 1998, Tripp told investigators that Lewinsky's private descriptions of her
encounters with Clinton included the infliction of pain.
"I don't mean abusive," Tripp said. "I mean very over the top,
out of control, physically powerful, where he would repeatedly say to Monica,
'I'm not hurting you, am I?' And essentially he was, but she didn't say he
White House steward Bayani Nelvis is said to have feared the president was
physically abusing Lewinsky was well, telling a co-worker that she appeared
"shaky and in shock" after one sex session. (See: Monica's 'Juanita
In an interview last year, Tripp told King that she believed Clinton was
involved with other women at the White House and that the behavior was ongoing.
King declined to follow up.
The CNN host did not revisit the topic during his conversation with Tripp