The Greatest Hoax on Earth
"Jews have an IQ of 115"!
This is something this author has always accepted at face value, without ever once questioning it, until it seemed to be repeated once too often. Then J. Phillipe Rushton made a comment which finally broke the stupor. After reading and re-reading the following comment from Professor Rushton, it was time to fully research the claim:
How did a group which our own immigration policy determined 80% of to be "feeble minded ... morons" just 80 years ago transition into the majority of the members of our top proffessions? Why are jews 50% of lawyers and judges and doctors, 75% of the owners of our media outlets, and 20% of our teachers? And why did this group appeal to the US Census Bureau in 1957 to discontinue the practice of defining jews as a race, which they certainly are, at the same time that every other race and sex are continuously analyzed and surveyed and tested and questioned?
In other words, who was trying to hide what, and why?
There have always been questions about why our social pathologies seemed to explode in the 1960s, but the mainstream media did an excellent job of concealing that pathology and avoiding the questions. You wouldn't know, for example, from everyday newspaper articles that the US prison population increased ten fold since then. Nor that the divorce rate doubled yet again, giving us the undisputed highest divorce rate in the world, nor that our murder rate increased ten fold in the 20th Century, leaving few citizens of the world with a higher probability of being murdered than American citizens. Nor that 70% of the world's lawyers are in the US, even though we're only 4.5% of the world population, so that we now have 60 times as many lawyers per capita than Japan who has four times as many engineers per capita than us. Nor that we spend twice as much as a percent of GDP for health care than countries like Japan and Australia whose men have a four year longer life expectancy. Unless you followed it very closely, you wouldn't know that American 12th graders score dead last in 17 of 34 TIMSS subjects in 1995, nor that there is a direct correlation between TIMSS scores and Personal Savings, with Singapore who scored first saving 52 cents of each wage dollar and the US who scored last having a *negative* Personal Savings rate.
You wouldn't ever consider that the only industrialized nation in the world with a *negative* Personal Savings rate could hardly be viewed by the rest of the world as "the world's last superpower", yet this is the title our mainstream media chose to bestow on the remnants of this once great nation. You wouldn't know that the polio epidemic of the 1950s was a complete hoax, based on a study of only 50,000 children at a time when the incidence of paralytic polio was only 0.09 per 100,000 children. You would have to study 1,111,111 children in order to locate one child with paralytic polio, which would be an unacceptable sample size to justify any mass innoculation, particularly one that was known early on to have the SV-40 monkey virus in it.
The result is that most Americans sitting in a doctor's office reading the following, as well as their doctors, would not and cannot understand something that Alan Phillips understood instantly.
Mr. Phillips, just as the rest of us, would presume that a doctor who had taken the time and spent the money to educate himself as a doctor would understand what Mr. Phillips understood innately. His concern for his own child brought him to a realization that the doctor obviously could not care less about: vaccinating his child with that vaccine means that he is about 1,143 more likely to have an adverse reaction to it than to die from the disease in the first place. If one child dies from each 1,143 "adverse reactions" then the vaccination is no less deadly than not being vaccinated at all. If more than one child dies for each of 1,143 "adverse reactions" (a very real probability), then the vaccine itself is more dangerous than the disease it's supposed to protect against.
But the unfortunate thing is that the presumption that the doctor knew this is dangerous, and it's not borne out by the facts. The critical thinking skills required to make this analysis are missing from candidates to our medical schools. Where many other standardized tests correlate closely with tests of critical thinking skills, the MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) scores do not. For some "mysterious" reason, students selected for medical schools are precisely those who don't have those skills. And for another "mysterious" reason, most of those who are accepted under this criterea are jews.
Was this an accident--or was it planned?
To answer that question, another anomaly in our social construct needs to be examined. And the question which must be answered is why judges and lawyers have received so much undeserved praise from the mainstream media and from Hollywood. Most countries view lawyers as a necessary evil, which is why they have 1/60th as many lawyers per capita as we do, but they also believe that judges and lawyers must have the highest critical thinking skills so the few they have are those with the best skills. Our approach is exactly the reverse. Not only do we have 60 times as many as is absolutely necessary for a society to function, but the most qualified applicants are routinely rejected from our law schools through a slick affirmative action program which enabled jews to become more than half of the professors and students at our top law schools, like Harvard Law School. The result is that law majors are some of the lowest scoring students on the Graduate Record Examination, scoring in the range of home economics and social work majors, and 200 to 300 points lower than math, engineering, or science majors.
The races and sexes of our judges, who were mostly law students, are documented with abundant precision, with only one exception: jews. You must question why it is that our own Census Bureau deems that we should know exactly what percentage of our judges are Pacific Islanders or Asians or non-Hispanic Whites, or Mexicans, or Cubans--yet conceals the number of jewish judges by including them in the same category as White judges.
Why the secrecy? And in particular, why the secrecy about such an important social function: justice? And who wins by this secrecy? Obviously the majority of Americans don't benefit by keeping so many secrets from them, so who supports this secrecy, and why?
The answer is that all 5.5 million jews in this country are interested in concealing these facts, because if their test scores were known, Americans would realize we've been hoodwinked by one of the slickest propaganda campaigns ever known to mankind. Even if you were to presume that the lowest scoring students of each race and sex are the ones who are admitted to law schools, and if you estimate the test scores for jews to be equivalent to the test scores for Hispanics, the resulting composite score is still higher than it is for law students.