Continued from "Nuremberg: The Crime That Will Not
That was the reality. Judge Jackson, handling the prosecution of Nuremberg's most
important trials was a man with presidential ambitions who needed a high profile carved
out of a self-serving stage: The Nuremberg Trials were to be the launching pad of his
presidential race. The Nuremberg court was not selected from, or composed of, judges of
the neutral Swiss, or the neutral Swedes, or some more distant African, Asian or Latin
American countries. American civilian judges to a large extent made up the core of the
Allied judges--not military career officers, who might have had some understanding and
compassion for what the military leaders and the civilian government under extreme war
time conditions lived through. They could have undoubtedly had a greater appreciation of
why some of the wartime measures were undertaken by Germany in the desperate days of the
war. The "liberal country club" experienced set of small town American judges
Furthermore, the Allied victors blatantly carried on their war against the Germans by
other means long after the shooting had stopped--not by bombs and bullets but this time by
falsely diagnosing psychologists or, worse, by giving torturers a free hand: cynical and
brutal investigators who could, and frequently did, mistreat, beat, whip, starve,
suffocate and mutilate their prisoners into giving confessions and statements which were
as cruelly extracted as were the confessions from witches during the disgusting witchcraft
trials of the Dark Ages.
The injustice of the Nuremberg Trials was testified to not only by Harlan Fiske Stone,
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, but also Iowa Supreme Court
Justice Charles F. Wennerstrum, a man of the Midwest, who sat on one of the tribunals
trying lesser alleged Nazi war criminals after the war.
Wennerstrum pointed out in a celebrated and controversial interview given to a reporter of
the Chicago Daily Tribune that frequently the interrogators and some of the
prosecutors were Jews who had fled Nazi Germany and came back in Allied uniforms to
torment and seek revenge on the National Socialists who had wanted to expel the Jews from
European living space because they considered them harmful to the war effort and to
Western European civilization.
Here is how the article described the lot that came to post-war Germany to settle private
scores, as seen through Justice Wennerstrum's eyes, after he quit in disgust:
"If I had known seven months ago what I know today," (Wennerstrum) told
friends as he packed to leave for America, "I would never have come here. . . The
initial war crimes trial here was judged and prosecuted by Americans, Russians, British
and French with much of the time, effort and expenses devoted to whitewashing the Allies
and placing the sole blame for World War II upon Germany.
"What I have said of the nationalist character of the tribunals," the judge
continued, "applies to the prosecution. The high ideals announced as the motives for
creating these tribunals has not been evident.
"The prosecution has failed to maintain objectivity aloof from vindictiveness, aloof
from personal ambitions for convictions. It has failed to strive to lay down precedents
which might help the world to avoid future wars.
The entire atmosphere here is unwholesome. Linguists were needed. the Americans are
notably poor linguists. Lawyers, clerks, interpreters and researchers were employed who
became Americans only in recent years, whose backgrounds were embedded in Europe's hatreds
and prejudices. . . (emphasis added) (Chicago Daily Tribune, 23 February 1948)
In other words, the Allies supplied the interrogators, most of them Jews--as some of
the victims, who had had a lifetime of experience in dealing with Jews and thus recognized
them, have stated. Those of us who are German and can speak German can easily discern the
ethnicity of some of the accusers by their mere accents and patterns of speech, even in
radio broadcasts and newsreels.
Most of the evidence in the trials was "documentary," selected by the Allies
from the large tonnage of captured records. The document selection was made by the
prosecution. The defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution
considered material to the case and were made available to the defense. The Allies could
choose to release or to hide and/or destroy any documents which did not fit their post-war
strategy or plans at Nuremberg. The Allies admitted elsewhere that their propaganda
Ministries and Intelligence Services had previously forged Nazi stamps, Nazi passes, Nazi
passports, orders, ID cards etc. which fooled the Nazis many times because they were so
perfect and over which the Allied propagandists gloat to this day. It does not take a
great leap of the imagination to think what these same Allied Government agencies, their
personnel and forgers of documents could do now with all the captured genuine German
document-producing facilities, the captured type writers, rubber stamps and tons of letter
heads of all sizes and description and of any National Socialist organization you care to
Even setting aside questionable "documentary" evidence, let's look at some of
the accused's "testimony"--how it was extracted, and what it really means.
Like vile exclamation marks, at the heart of the Nuremberg Tribunal stand certain words:
"Genocide" "Gas chamber." "Six million." These words, and
the value judgment concepts they connote, were derived largely from the admissions and
affidavit of one man, Rudolf Hoess, the one-time war-time Kommandant at Auschwitz.
Rudolf Hoess was the Allies' most important witness to the "Holocaust." His
affidavit and his testimony were quoted extensively both by the prosecution and in the
judgment of the IMT at Nuremberg, as well as by the press. It was his testimony which laid
the foundation and validated the claim of the ". . . extermination of millions of
people by gas at Auschwitz." Hoess's "confession" is heavily relied upon by
historians like Raul Hilberg and others as a primary documentary source to this day.
It is true that Hoess witnessed at Nuremberg to horrendous "atrocities," and he
also confirmed the "truth" under oath of an affidavit which he agreed to sign
for the prosecution. In it, he confessed to having given orders for the gassing of
millions of victims. The affidavit, by the way, was in English, a language he did not
speak or understand, according to family members.
We now know from the book "Legions of Death" that Rudolf Hoess was beaten almost
to death by Jewish members of the British Field Police Force upon capture and badly
mistreated thereafter until he gave this very devastating "testimony" and
"affidavit" used by the Allies propagandists ever since. You be the judge. Here
is an excerpt from this book by Rupert Butler, published by Hamlyn Paperbacks, page 235:
At 5 PM on 11 March 1946, Frau Hoess opened her front door to six intelligence
specialists in British uniform, most of them tall and menacing and all of them practiced
in the more sophisticated techniques of sustained and merciless investigation.
No physical violence was used on the family: it was scarcely necessary. Wife and children
were separated and guarded. Clarke's tone was deliberately low-key and conversational.
He began mildly: "I understand your husband came to see you as recently as last
Frau Hoess merely replied: "I haven't seen him since he absconded months ago"
Clarke tried once more, saying gently but with a tone of reproach: "You know that
isn't true." Then all at once his manner had changed and he was shouting: "If
you don't tell us, we'll turn you over to the Russians and they'll put you before a firing
squad. Your son will go to Siberia."
It proved more than enough. Eventually, a broken Frau Hoess betrayed the whereabouts of
the former Auschwitz Kommandant, the man who now called himself Franz Lang. Suitable
intimidation of the son and daughter produced precisely identical information.
When they found Hoess, here is how the capture played out. Clarke, one of the
participants, recalls it vividly:
"He was lying on top of a three-tier bunker wearing a new pair of silk pyjamas. We
discovered later that he had lost the cyanide pill most of them carried. Not that he would
have had much chance to use it because we had rammed a torch (flashlight) into his
Hoess screamed in terror at the mere sight of the British uniforms.
Clarke yelled: "What is your name?"
With each answer of "Franz Lang," Clarke's hand crashed into the face of the
prisoner. The fourth time that happened, Hoess broke and admitted who he was.
The admission suddenly unleashed the loathing of the Jewish sergeants in the arresting
party whose parents had died in Auschwitz following an order signed by Hoess.
The prisoner was torn from the top bunk, the pyjama ripped from his body. He was then
dragged naked to one of the slaughter tables, where it seemed to Clarke the blows and
screams were endless.
Eventually, the Medical Officer urged the Captain: "Call them off, unless you want to
take back a corpse."
A blanket was thrown over Hoess and he was dragged to Clarke's car, where the sergeant
poured a substantial slug of whiskey down his throat. Then Hoess tried to sleep.
Clarke thrust his service stick under the man's eyelids and ordered in German: "Keep
your pig eyes open, you swine." . . .
The party arrived back at Heide around three in the morning. The snow was swirling still,
but the blanket was torn from Hoess and he was made to walk completely nude through the
prison yard to his cell. It took three days to get a coherent statement out of him.
This statement, tortured and terrorized out of him, was the one we are all familiar
with--the "proof" for the so-called "gassing of the Jews."
Historians today are finally admitting that Hoess is a totally unreliable witness--and is
it any wonder? He spoke of a concentration camp "Wolzek" which does not even
exist. He swore that 2,500,000 people were gassed and burned at Auschwitz and a further
half million died of disease, for a total dead of three million. The Toronto Sun of July
18, 1990 claimed 1.5 million. The Washington Post, on the same date, also mentioned 1.5
million. Quoted from an article by Krzyszlov Leski, we have the following:
Poland has cut its estimate of the number of people killed by the Nazis in the
Auschwitz death camp from 4 million to just over 1 million.
The vast majority of the dead are now accepted to have been Jews, despite claims by the
former Polish communist government that as many Poles perished in Hitler's largest
concentration camp. . .
The new study could rekindle the controversy over the scale of Hitler's final
Shevach Weiss, a death camp survivor and Labor Party member of the Israeli Parliament,
expressed disbelief at the revised estimates, saying: "It sounds shocking and
strange." . . .
Shmuel Krakowsky, head of research at Israel's Yad Vashem memorial for Jewish victims of
the Holocaust, said the new Polish figures were correct.
"The 4 million figure was let slip by Capt. Rudolf Hoess, the death camp's Nazi
commander. Some have bought it, but it was exaggerated." . . .
But the Polish authorities said accurate estimates of the number killed could only be made
by studying German documents seized by the Soviet Union. But Moscow has refused to return
A most convenient excuse! In 1989 I organized a write-in campaign to persuade the
then-Soviet Leader Gorbachev to release the Auschwitz Death Registers captured in 1945
when the Red Army took over the Auschwitz complex. A few months afterwards this actually
happened. Gorbachev released these all-important documents to the Red Cross, which showed
in minute detail why people had died in Auschwitz, the cause and time of death, their
birth, address etc.
74,000 names of people who had died were listed, of which only approximately 30,000 were Jews, along with an almost equal number of Poles and members
of other nationalities.
The incredibly shrinking Holocaust! The "millions" that we have heard about for
half a century and that we hear and read about still today all started with the
"testimony" beaten out of poor Hoess on that horrible night in defeated Germany.
Historian Christopher Browning finally had to admit in a recent Vanity Fair article that
Hoess was an unreliable witness. Browning stated that
". . . Hoess was always a very weak and confused witness. The revisionists
use him all the time for this reason, in order to try and discredit the memory of
Auschwitz as a whole." (Holocaust Revisionism Source Book, 1994, p. 1)
But does that invalidate the Revisionist claims or their strategy? Not at all. On the
contrary. After all, Hoess's testimony was used as the skeleton on which the entire
Holocaust myth about mass gassings was constructed in the first place. Revisionists have
concentrated on Hoess precisely because he is probably the most important source
for Holocaust historians' conclusions on and exaggerations about the Holocaust. Raul
Hilberg, who wrote the "Bible" of the "Holocaust," The Destruction
of the European Jews, (Holmes & Meier, Revised Edition, 1985 ) relies on Hoess's
testimony heavily, and Hoess was the primary witness relied upon by the Nuremberg Tribunal
in their judgment regarding the "extermination of the Jews," even though he told
the court of having been savagely tortured.
What's more, Hoess's treatment by the Allies and the total unreliability of his
"evidence" are not unusual. We don't know how many of the accused at the
Nuremberg trials were badly mistreated, since references in the trial transcripts to their
mistreatment was expunged from the record. (Read this again! Material damaging to the
Allies was expunged from the Nuremberg trial transcripts!)
An example is Streicher's testimony. Streicher was reported in the London Times as having
testified that he was tortured, whipped, spat on, and forced to drink from a latrine.
(Streicher Opens His Case, The Times, April 27, 1946). His testimony was later expunged
from the record of the trial with the active participation of the prosecution, the
president of the Tribunal, and even his own defense lawyer!
Other traces of the brutal treatment of the Nuremberg prisoners, however, have survived.
One of these witnesses was Gauleiter Sauckel's reference to threats to his family, which
did remain in the transcript. During his testimony in May of 1946, Sauckel testified that
he signed a document, even though he did not know what was in that document, after his
family of 10 children was threatened with deportation to Russia.
And finally, it must not be forgotten that t his is the only judicial proceeding conducted
in the name of civilized nations where there was no appeal mechanism to a parallel or
higher authority for a review of the proceedings or any verdicts that this so-called
international military tribunal arrived at. Their judgments over the leadership of
Europe's most populous state, against whom they had just fought a murderous, near
genocidal war, were final and deadly.
Keep all that in mind as you read, watch and listen to all the emotional hype in the mass
media on television and radio of these days. And for what?
The Jewish leader Nahum Goldman spells it out for you in his astounding book, The
Jewish Paradox, Pages 123-125, admitting to the mother of all frauds. In his own
words, at the conclusion of the agreement Goldman obtained from Dr. Adenauer, the German
Quisling State's first Allied-appointed chancellor,
". . . the Germans will have paid out a total of 80 billion. . . Without the
German reparations that started coming through during its first ten years as a state,
Israel would not have half of its present infrastructure: All the trains in Israel are
German, the ships are German, and the same goes for electrical installations and a great
deal of Israel's industry . . . and that is setting aside the individual pensions paid to
survivors. Israel today receives hundreds of millions of dollars in German currency each
year . . . In some years the sums of money received by Israel from Germany has been as
much as double or treble the contribution made by collections from international Jewry.
Nowadays, there is no longer any opposition to the principle. (emphasis added)
Not anywhere you look!
After the Nuremberg Trials and Proceedings are stripped of the hyperbole and smoke screens
which surrounds them, it can be put quite bluntly:
The Allies did it all. The Allies fought a war on foreign shores--in part to establish the
State of Israel. The Allies lent a willing hand to political ambitions that grew out of
the Zionist camp. By means of the Nuremberg trials, the Allies helped the establishment
and financing of Israel. So as to secure Israel, the Allies and their personnel became
accusers, researchers, interrogators, prosecutors, judges and executioners--all in one!
The Allies supplied the "experts" who sifted through the German documents, which
were all totally in Allied control, highlighting incriminating documents, discarding
exonerating evidence. These investigators were told only to "find" incriminating
documents against the hapless accused, as I was told by the American scholar Charles
Weber, Ph.D., who had been one of these Allied researchers, and who testified at my own
trials. These researchers were told were told to ignore the documents that might have
spared the lives of the accused German leaders. When all was said and done, there was not
even an appeal.
U.S. Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, speaking of the American Chief Prosecutor, Jackson,
finally had this to say, as mentioned in the Viking Press hard cover, cited before, p. 746
"Jackson is away conducting his high grade lynching party in
Nuremberg," he remarked. "I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to
see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law.
This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas."
Some sanctimonious fraud!
Some record for the Allies to be "proud of"--to have helped manufacture such a
sick, perverted Marxist/Zionist inspired legal farce that would condemn to death the
leaders of the only military effort ever undertaken to stop the "evil empire"
from bringing to us all their "hate law" ideology.
Are now the chickens coming home to roost? That's how America and the "free
world" have showed their gratitude to the defenders of Europe and Western
Civilization: by hanging brave and honest men who tried so valiantly for so long to stop
the decadence and the hypocrisy of what we now call, shuddering, ". . . the coming
New World Order"!
I bow my head in reverence to those who were judicially murdered at Nuremberg. They were
the world's martyrs, not villains. Not one of them would have been condemned to death in a
fair trial. Not one! Let's not forget they sacrificed an entire nation, and in the end
themselves, to save Western civilization. They were defeated by thugs in robes and
gangsters in uniform and by the conspiracies hatched by shysters from the ghettos and
shtetls of Eastern Europe.