Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

xmas3.gif (5334 bytes)

 

Jews in Hollywood

The jews in Hollywood know exactly what the odds are of making money on a movie.  They know that they are losing money, lots of money, by pumping out the R-rated movies.  They know better than we do that a G-rated film is twice as likely as an R-rated film to have box-office revenues in excess of three times the production budget.

They LOSE money so they can propagate immorality and anti-Christianity. They give up hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue in order to pump our children's heads full of pro-jewish, anti-Christian, satanistic screeds, along with rap music so disgusting that our Forefathers could never have fathomed it, or known that their Constitution would be twisted inside out by IDIOTS like Sandra Day O'Connor.

Why?  The entire motion picture industry in the US is only $25 billion per year, and Hollywood is probably only $10 billion of that.   This small investment in the chronic anti-family rherotic which gave us the world's highest divorce rate and lowest personal savings is a pittance compared to the $200 billion per year that flows into divorce courts and lawyers, and the $270 billion extra cost of the prison system required to house the children raised in those broken families when they become adults. To the jews who run and profit off this system, this pittance of 2% is a small  investment to assure a steady supply of broken Christian families in the future.

Hitler was right--they should have been sent to Madagascar, and sealed off from the rest of the Godly, moral world.

.

 

Subject: R-RATED MOVIES LESS SUCCESSFUL
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 20:50:31 -0500


"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is
eternal vigilance, which condition if he break, servitude is at
once the consequence of his crime----and the punishment of
his guilt."                                John Philpot Curran
(1750-1817)

--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: National Center for Policy Analysis <ncpa@ncpa.org>


   o    "R" MOVIES MAKE MONEY HALF AS OFTEN AS "G" ONES, but
       Hollywood makes more R-rated films....JOURNAL OF BUSINESS




More than half of the movies released between 1985 and 1996 were
rated R. Yet all but one of the 20 highest-grossing movies ever
made have been rated G, PG or PG-13. One reason may be that R-
rated films -- portrayed as attacks on conventional social and
moral values -- attract a disproportionately large share of
Hollywood's on-screen and behind-the-camera stars. But in
addition, Hollywood executives are using a faulty decision model
for evaluating movies as economic prospects.

All movies have uncertain prospects for financial success, and
before one is released, a Hollywood executive can only know the
probability of outcomes. Since each movie is unique, even these
probabilities may be difficult to ascertain. They are what
economists call random variables. To make informed decisions,
the studio must get the statistical model of these random
variables right. This calls for a statistical model that
compares whole probability distributions rather than averages or
expectations.

During the period studied, G, PG and PG-13 movies had a higher
yearly success rate than R-rated movies when success is measured
on the basis of box-office revenues and returns on production
costs.

   o   Only an average 6 percent of R-rated movies earned
       cumulative box-office revenues in excess of $50 million,
       compared to 13 percent of G- and PG-rated movies and 10
       percent of PG-13 movies.

   o   An average 20 percent of G-rated films, 16 percent of PG-
       rated films and 12 percent of PG-13-rated films had box-
       office revenues in excess of three times the production
       budget, compared to 11 percent of R-rated films.

The number of R-rated successes is high because more of these
movies are made (and that may blind decision makers who do not
pay attention to the odds), but the success rate of R of R-rated
movies is much less than the success rates of G, PG and PG-13
movies. An executive seeking to trim the downside risk and
increase the upside possibilities in a studio's film portfolio
could do so by shifting production dollars out of R-rated movies
into G, PG and PG-13 movies.

Source: Arthur De Vany and W. David Walls, "Does Hollywood Make
Too Many R-rated Movies? Risk, Stochastic Dominance and the
Illusion of Expectation," forthcoming, Journal of Business.

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party