|
|
"IQ" vs. Standardized Tests"When Wechsler was developing his IQ test, he found that out of 105 tests assessing skills in solving maze-puzzles, involving the most heterogeneous populations throughout the world, 99 showed an incontrovertible male superiority. (Wechsler resolved this type of problem by eliminating all those tests that resulted in findings of significant sex differences.)"Leonardo_member@newsguy.com in 9miftl0239r@drn.newsguy.com So the IQs of men and women were "equalized" by throwing out 94% of the test? How important is this? Worldwide, with rare exceptions, annual incomes increase an average of $2,000 for each one point increase in IQ, with Japanese men at the top (with an IQ greater than 110 and annual income greater than $110,200) and black women in Africa at the bottom (with an IQ less than 55 and annual income less than $200). The IQ gap between Asian men and Asian women when correlated with GRE scores is 19 points, when correlated with SAT math scores is 14 points, TIMSS physics scores is 17 points, PISA math scores at 15 years old is 10 points, ACT math scores is 19 points, IAEP math scores is 12 points, and NAEP 12th grade math scores is 10 points. The IQ gap between sexes for all other races is similar, and by comparison the IQ gap between the US (at 98) and Mexico (at 87) is only 11 points which represents an annual income gap of $22,000 ($4,870 in Mexico, $26,870 in the US) Take five minutes to complete the Poll on Exiling Blacks
It's IQ Tests Which Show the Greatest Overlap Between Races and SexesIQ Scores With Standard Deviation of 15% x2
IQ Scores With Standard Deviation of 15%
IQ Scores With Standard Deviation of 10%
Standard Deviation for PISA Math is 16% of the Math Score
|
| Group1 | Mean GRE Quantitative Score | Lynn IQ Adjusted |
| American Indian | 479 | 75 |
| Men | 511 | 83 |
| Women | 459 | 70 |
| Asian/Pacific | 598 | 106 |
| Men | 638 | 116 |
| Women | 572 | 99 |
| Black/African | 416 | 58 |
| Men | 446 | 65 |
| Women | 404 | 55 |
| Mexican American | 475 | 73 |
| Men | 517 | 84 |
| Women | 451 | 67 |
| Puerto Rican | 471 | 74 |
| Men | 504 | 82 |
| Women | 448 | 66 |
| Other Hispanic | 495 | 79 |
| Men | 543 | 91 |
| Women | 469 | 72 |
| White | 540 | 90 |
| Men | 586 | 103 |
| Women | 514 | 84 |
| Other | 541 | 90 |
| Men | 583 | 102 |
| Women | 509 | 83 |
There are many people, including our academicians, including even White men, who claim or believe that standardized test scores are not indicative of IQ in spite of voluminous data to the contrary. These are the same people who whine "racist", "anti-semite", "sexist", if we simply point out that they are wrong and standardized tests are right, thus deflecting any criticism of their error.
Students and industry and universities and colleges don't spend billions of dollars annually to measure this aptitude, though, if it was not important to them. Whether or not we ever agree that this aptitude IS IQ is irrelevant--for the last half century, it reveals a consistent pattern, it shows the gap between races AND sexes is increasing, and it suggests that American blacks now score lower than [read: have lower IQs than] blacks in their own homelands.
In order to avoid this charge of racism, we WHITE men make the following comparisons between Asian men in Asia and the U.S., and women of other races, including Asian women.
| Asian Men vs | Black Women | Mexican Women | Indian Women | White Women | Asian Women |
| NAEP | 64 | 56 | 43 | 25 | 14 |
| IAEP | 122 | 121 | 101 | 42 | 9 |
| ACT x 20 | 126 | 86 | 78 | 10 | 4 |
| SAT | 161 | 133 | 113 | 68 | 34 |
| GRE | 258 | 212 | 199 | 140 | 72 |
| TIMSS | 274 | 222 | 199 | 62 | 17 |
Please don't view this smaller gap in GRE scores than in TIMSS scores for black women (258 vs. 274) to be representative of all blacks in the US, because this was the select few who made it through college and are now hoping to enter graduate school and thus are a very select group of blacks. Also note that even though White men represent as much as 95% of those who score in the region most desirous to industry and education, women were 55% of college admissions, so the highest scoring White men are not even represented in ACT, SAT, nor GRE scores.
In order to be able to compare ACT scores with other scores, they were multiplied by 20, and only then do they show exactly the same pattern as all other tests. In TIMSS, Korean boys (even though they scored 27 points lower than boys in Singapore, 615 vs. 642), were compared to White girls in Switzerland (representative of Whites), girls in Portugal (representative of Indians), girls in Colombia (representative of Hispanics), and girls in South Africa (representative of blacks). Also, in IAEP, Korean boys were used as the baseline, with girls in Switzerland representing Whites, girls in Brazil representing Hispanics, and girls in Mozambique (who scored unusually high for an African nation) representative of Blacks.

Professor Lynn's excellent list of the iq's of 186 nations has been updated and confirmed based on the PISA scores from their 2006 international study, as well as from the 2003 TIMSS study. Based solely on PISA, the biggest increases in IQ scores that we see are 11 points for Azerbaijan, 8 points for Ireland, 7 points for Canada and Croatia, and 6 points for Australia and Estonia, and the biggest decreases are 10 points for Argentina and Kyrgyzstan, 6 points for Italy, and 4 points for Uruguay and Romania. Based on TIMSS, Malaysia's IQ is 6 points higher than his estimate, Iran and Tunisia are 4 points higher, while Chile's is 8 points lower, Italy's is 6 points lower, Norway's is 5 points lower, and Japan's, Belgium's, Sweden's are 4 points lower.
Based only on these two studies, there are only four countries which really stick out: Italy's actual IQ appears 6 points lower than his estimate, Chile's appears 3-8 points lower, Japan's appears 1-4 points lower, whereas Russia's appears 2 points higher.
According to TIMSS, Hong Kong is 105 rather than his estimate of 107, but PISA places it at 107. South Korea is 1 point higher according to PISA, but exactly what he estimated on TIMSS, 106. The Netherlands is 3 points higher according to PISA, but 2 points lower according to TIMSS, putting his estimate of 102 right in the middle. According to PISA, Azerbaijan is 11 points higher, Ireland is 8 points higher, Canada and Croatia are 7 points higher, Estonia is 6 points higher, Switzerland and Greece are 4 points higher, Belgium and Latvia are 3 points higher, France and Lithuania are 2 points higher, Poland is 1 point higher, Argentina and Kyrgyzstan are 10 points lower, Luxembourg and Uruguay are 4 points lower, but they are all right on according to TIMSS, providing triple confirmation of Professor Lynn's data.

The huge gender gap between all races of all 46 nations but one (Israel) in all TIMSS subjects, particularly physics (an EXTREMELY important skill in this day and age of the technological society) proves that the theory that men and women have "equal IQs" is wrong. Correlating these scores with Professor Lynn's "IQ of Nations" produces the following graph:


There's no reason to believe that actual White women and White men in the US don't have IQ's equivalent to the many European nations in this subject (101 and 113 respectively), nor that Asian men and women don't have IQ's equivalent to Japan (103 and 118 respectively). There's also no reason to believe that Hispanic women and Hispanic men in the US don't have IQ's equivalent to Mexico (81 and 93 respectively). The VERY low scores in ALL the international tests Israel has ever participated in suggest that Professor Lynn's estimate of 94 is way too high for jews. And there's no reason whatsoever to believe that American blacks, no matter how much gene flow there might have been from Caucasoids, is the 85 which is so highly touted by the "news" media. With two dozen African nations having IQ's lower than 70, we'd have to believe that it was the most intelligent Africans who where taken into slavery to believe that they now have IQs 15 points higher.
Furthermore, the above assumptions would mean that the average IQ of the U.S. is 101.6 rather than the 98 estimated by Professor Lynn:
| Race/sex | black women | black men | jew women | jew men | Hispanic women | Hispanic men | White women | White men | Asian women | Asian men | Total |
| % Population | 6.50% | 6.50% | 1% | 1% | 5% | 5% | 36.00% | 36.00% | 2% | 2% | 100.00% |
| IQ | 77 | 85 | 94 | 94 | 81 | 93 | 101 | 113 | 103 | 118 | |
| Proportion | 5.005 | 5.525 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 4.05 | 4.65 | 36.36 | 40.68 | 2.06 | 2.36 | 101.6 |
What does fit the curve is when blacks are assumed to have an IQ equivalent to their brethren in Africa, the gap between black women and black men is assumed to be only 6 points as their close scores in SAT and GRE suggest (rather than 13 points like Norway), jews are assumed to have an IQ which is equivalent to their 446 score in TIMSS, the gap between sexes in Israel is assumed to be zero as girls in Israel score higher than boys, and that 72% of Americans are Whites with IQs equivalent to Norway. The fact that Whites in Iowa score 154 SAT points higher than the national average for "whites" as reported by the College Board proves this to be the case, and produces the following:
| Race/sex | black women | black men | jew women | jew men | Hispanic women | Hispanic men | White women | White men | Asian women | Asian men | Total |
| % Population | 6.50% | 6.50% | 1% | 1% | 5% | 5% | 36% | 36% | 2% | 2% | 100% |
| IQ | 51 | 59 | 70 | 70 | 81 | 93 | 101 | 113 | 103 | 118 | |
| Proportion | 3.315 | 3.835 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 4.05 | 4.65 | 36 | 40.68 | 2.06 | 2.36 | 98.0 |

![]()
In ounces of alcohol per capita per year, IQs increase one IQ point for each 3 ounces increase in alcohol consumption.
Each One Point Increase in IQ Saves 9 Lives per 100,000 Motor Vehicles

![]()
http://www.iapsych.com/iqmr/fe/LinkedDocuments/lynn2010.pdf
IQs for 185 countries
http://www.rlynn.co.uk
http://www.rlynn.co.uk/pages/article_intelligence/t4.htm
"National IQs Based on the Results of Intelligence Tests
and Estimated
National IQs (marked by *) Based on the IQs of Neighbouring
or Other Comparable
Countries.
"Note: IQ purists say anything within a four point range is
considered the
same or comparable", Professor Lynn
Country - National IQ
| Country | Lynn IQ | Pisa 2006 | Pisa IQ | PISA Adjust ment | TIMSS 2003 | TIMSS IQ | TIMSS Adjus tment |
| a.. Hong Kong | 107 | 549 | 107 | 0 | 586 | 105 | -2 |
| b.. Korea, South | 106 | 547 | 107 | 1 | 589 | 106 | 0 |
| i.. Netherlands | 102 | 531 | 105 | 3 | 536 | 100 | -2 |
| l.. Switzerland | 101 | 530 | 105 | 4 | 101 | ||
| ab.. Canada | 97 | 527 | 104 | 7 | 97 | ||
| c.. Japan | 105 | 523 | 104 | -1 | 537 | 101 | -4 |
| o.. New Zealand | 100 | 522 | 104 | 4 | 494 | 96 | -4 |
| m.. Belgium | 100 | 520 | 103 | 3 | 537 | 100 | 0 |
| v.. Australia | 98 | 520 | 104 | 6 | 505 | 97 | -1 |
| ad.. Estonia | 97 | 515 | 103 | 6 | 97 | ||
| g.. Germany | 102 | 504 | 102 | 0 | 102 | ||
| ak.. Slovakia | 96 | 504 | 101 | 5 | 508 | 98 | 2 |
| k.. Sweden | 101 | 502 | 101 | 0 | 499 | 97 | -4 |
| Scotland | 498 | 0 | |||||
| ay.. Ireland | 93 | 501 | 101 | 8 | 93 | ||
| u.. France | 98 | 496 | 100 | 2 | 98 | ||
| q.. United Kingdom | 100 | 495 | 100 | 0 | 100 | ||
| s.. Poland | 99 | 495 | 100 | 1 | 99 | ||
| r.. Hungary | 99 | 491 | 99 | 0 | 529 | 99 | 0 |
| j.. Luxembourg | 101 | 490 | 100 | -1 | 101 | ||
| z.. Norway | 98 | 490 | 100 | 2 | 461 | 93 | -5 |
| af.. Latvia | 97 | 486 | 100 | 3 | 505 | 97 | 0 |
| ag.. Lithuania | 97 | 486 | 99 | 2 | 502 | 97 | 0 |
| t.. Spain | 99 | 480 | 99 | 0 | 99 | ||
| aj.. Russia | 96 | 476 | 98 | 2 | 508 | 98 | 2 |
| bs.. Azerbaijan | 87 | 476 | 98 | 11 | 87 | ||
| aa.. United States | 98 | 474 | 98 | 0 | 504 | 97 | -1 |
| bj.. Croatia | 90 | 467 | 97 | 7 | 90 | ||
| aq.. Portugal | 95 | 466 | 96 | 1 | 95 | ||
| h.. Italy | 102 | 462 | 96 | -6 | 484 | 96 | -6 |
| be.. Greece | 92 | 459 | 96 | 4 | 92 | ||
| as.. Israel | 94 | 442 | 94 | 0 | 466* | 92 | -2 |
| am.. Uruguay | 96 | 427 | 92 | -4 | 96 | ||
| bl.. Turkey | 90 | 424 | 91 | 1 | 90 | ||
| bh.. Thailand | 91 | 417 | 91 | 0 | 91 | ||
| at.. Romania | 94 | 415 | 90 | -4 | 475 | 94 | 0 |
| aw.. Bulgaria | 93 | 413 | 90 | -3 | 476 | 94 | 1 |
| av.. Chile | 93 | 411 | 90 | -3 | 387 | 85 | -8 |
| bx.. Mexico | 87 | 406 | 89 | 2 | 87 | ||
| bn.. Indonesia | 89 | 391 | 87 | -2 | 411 | 88 | -1 |
| bv.. Jordan | 87 | 384 | 87 | 0 | 424 | 89 | 2 |
| ah.. Argentina | 96 | 381 | 86 | -10 | 96 | ||
| bq.. Colombia | 88 | 370 | 85 | -3 | 88 | ||
| da.. Tunisia | 84 | 365 | 84 | 0 | 410 | 88 | 4 |
| ec.. Qatar | 78 | 318 | 78 | 0 | 78 | ||
| bw.. Kyrgyzstan | 87 | 311 | 77 | -10 | 87 | ||
| d.. Korea, North | 105 | 105 | 105 | ||||
| e.. Taiwan | 104 | 104 | 104 | ||||
| f.. Austria | 102 | 102 | 102 | ||||
| n.. China | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| p.. Singapore | 100 | 100 | 100 | ||||
| w.. Denmark | 98 | 98 | 98 | ||||
| x.. Iceland | 98 | 98 | 98 | ||||
| y.. Mongolia | 98 | 98 | 98 | ||||
| ac.. Czech Republic | 97 | 97 | 97 | ||||
| ae.. Finland | 97 | 97 | 97 | ||||
| ai.. Belarus | 96 | 96 | 96 | ||||
| al.. Ukraine | 96 | 96 | 96 | ||||
| an.. Vietnam | 96 | 96 | 96 | ||||
| ao.. Malta | 95 | 95 | 95 | ||||
| ap.. Moldova | 95 | 95 | 460 | 93 | -2 | ||
| ar.. Slovenia | 95 | 95 | 95 | ||||
| au.. Armenia | 93 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| ax.. Georgia | 93 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| az.. Kazakhstan | 93 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| ba.. Macedonia | 93 | 93 | 435 | 90 | -3 | ||
| bb.. Yugoslavia | 93 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| bc.. Brunei | 92 | 92 | 92 | ||||
| bd.. Cyprus | 92 | 92 | 459 | 92 | 0 | ||
| bf.. Malaysia | 92 | 92 | 508 | 98 | 6 | ||
| bg.. Costa Rica | 91 | 91 | 91 | ||||
| bi.. Albania | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||
| bk.. Peru | 90 | 90 | 90 | ||||
| bm.. Cambodia | 89 | 89 | 89 | ||||
| bo.. Suriname | 89 | 89 | 89 | ||||
| bp.. Laos | 89 | 89 | 89 | ||||
| br.. Venezuela | 88 | 88 | 88 | ||||
| bt.. Brazil | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| bu.. Iraq | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| by.. Samoa (Western) | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| bz.. Syria | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| ca.. Tajikistan | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| cb.. Tonga | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| cc.. Turkmenistan | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| cd.. Uzbekistan | 87 | 87 | 87 | ||||
| ce.. Burma (Myanmar) | 86 | 86 | 86 | ||||
| cf.. Philippines | 86 | 86 | 378 | 84 | -2 | ||
| cg.. Lebanon | 86 | 86 | 86 | ||||
| ch.. Bolivia | 85 | 85 | 85 | ||||
| ci.. Cuba | 85 | 85 | 85 | ||||
| cj.. Morocco | 85 | 85 | 85 | ||||
| ck.. Paraguay | 85 | 85 | 85 | ||||
| cl.. Algeria | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cm.. Dominican Republic | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cn.. El Salvador | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| co.. Guyana | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cp.. Honduras | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cq.. Iran | 84 | 84 | 411 | 88 | 4 | ||
| cr.. Kiribati | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cs.. Libya | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| ct.. Marshall Islands | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cu.. Micronesia | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cv.. Nicaragua | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cw.. Panama | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cx.. Papua New Guinea | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cy.. Puerto Rico | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| cz.. Solomon Islands | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| db.. Vanuatu | 84 | 84 | 84 | ||||
| dc.. Afghanistan | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| dd.. Bahrain | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| de.. Belize | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| df.. Egypt | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| dg.. Kuwait | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| dh.. Oman | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| di.. Saudi Arabia | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| dj.. United Arab Emirates | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| dk.. Yemen | 83 | 83 | 83 | ||||
| dl.. Bangladesh | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| dm.. India | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| dn.. Maldives | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| do.. Mauritius | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| dp.. Pakistan | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| dq.. Seychelles | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| dr.. Sri Lanka | 81 | 81 | 81 | ||||
| ds.. Ecuador | 80 | 80 | 80 | ||||
| dt.. Trinidad & Tobago | 80 | 80 | 80 | ||||
| du.. Comoros | 79 | 79 | 79 | ||||
| dv.. Guatemala | 79 | 79 | 79 | ||||
| dw.. Madagascar | 79 | 79 | 79 | ||||
| dx.. Barbados | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||||
| dy.. Bahamas | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||||
| dz.. Bhutan | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||||
| ea.. Cape Verde | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||||
| eb.. Nepal | 78 | 78 | 78 | ||||
| ed.. Zambia | 77 | 77 | 77 | ||||
| ee.. Antigua & Barbuda | 75 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| ef.. Grenada | 75 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| eg.. Dominica | 75 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| eh.. St. Kitts & Nevis | 75 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| ei.. St. Lucia | 75 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| ej.. St.Vincent/Grenadines | 75 | 75 | 75 | ||||
| ek.. Congo (Braz) | 73 | 73 | 73 | ||||
| el.. Mauritania | 73 | 73 | 73 | ||||
| em.. Uganda | 73 | 73 | 73 | ||||
| en.. Botswana | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| eo.. Chad | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| ep.. Haiti | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| eq.. Jamaica | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| er.. Kenya | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| es.. Lesotho | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| et.. Mosambique | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| eu.. Namibia | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| ev.. South Africa | 72 | 72 | 264 | 72 | 0 | ||
| ew.. Swaziland | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| ex.. Sudan | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| ey.. Tanzania | 72 | 72 | 72 | ||||
| ez.. C?te d'Ivoire | 71 | 71 | 71 | ||||
| fa.. Ghana | 71 | 71 | 71 | ||||
| fb.. Malawi | 71 | 71 | 71 | ||||
| fc.. Burundi | 70 | 70 | 70 | ||||
| fd.. Cameroon | 70 | 70 | 70 | ||||
| fe.. Rwanda | 70 | 70 | 70 | ||||
| ff.. Angola | 69 | 69 | 69 | ||||
| fg.. Benin | 69 | 69 | 69 | ||||
| fh.. Togo | 69 | 69 | 69 | ||||
| fi.. Central African Rep. | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||
| fj.. Djibouti | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||
| fk.. Eritrea | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||
| fl.. Mali | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||
| fm.. Somalia | 68 | 68 | 68 | ||||
| fn.. Niger | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||||
| fo.. Nigeria | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||||
| fp.. Burkina Faso | 66 | 66 | 66 | ||||
| fq.. Gabon | 66 | 66 | 66 | ||||
| fr.. Zimbabwe | 66 | 66 | 66 | ||||
| fs.. Congo (Zaire) | 65 | 65 | 65 | ||||
| ft.. Gambia | 64 | 64 | 64 | ||||
| fu.. Liberia | 64 | 64 | 64 | ||||
| fv.. Senegal | 64 | 64 | 64 | ||||
| fw.. Sierra Leone | 64 | 64 | 64 | ||||
| fx.. Ethiopia | 63 | 63 | 63 | ||||
| fy.. Guinea | 63 | 63 | 63 | ||||
| fz.. Guinea Bissau | 63 | 63 | 63 | ||||
| ga.. Sao Tome/Principe | 59 | 59 | 59 | ||||
| gb.. Equatorial Guinea | 59 | 59 | 59 |
http://www.rlynn.co.uk/index.php?page=richard-lynn-and-tatu-vanhanen-iq-and-global-inequality-2006
Country
Lynn IQ
i.. Netherlands
102
k.. Sweden
101
w.. Denmark
98
l.. Switzerland 101
x.. Iceland
98
z.. Norway
98
u.. France
98
o.. New Zealand
100
v.. Australia
98
f.. Austria
102
ar.. Slovenia
95
g.. Germany
102
r.. Hungary
99
h.. Italy
102
aj.. Russia
96
ag.. Lithuania
97
ac.. Czech Republic 97
aa.. United States 98
ab.. Canada
97
ev.. South Africa
72
a.. Hong Kong 107
b.. Korea, South
106
c.. Japan
105
m.. Belgium
100
ad.. Estonia
97
ak.. Slovakia
96
Scotland
ay.. Ireland
93
q.. United Kingdom 100
s.. Poland
99
j.. Luxembourg
101
af.. Latvia
97
t.. Spain
99
bs.. Azerbaijan
87
bj.. Croatia
90
aq.. Portugal
95
be.. Greece
92
as.. Israel
94
am.. Uruguay
96
bl.. Turkey
90
bh.. Thailand
91
at.. Romania
94
aw.. Bulgaria
93
av.. Chile
93
bx.. Mexico
87
bn.. Indonesia
89
bv.. Jordan
87
ah.. Argentina
96
bq.. Colombia 88
da.. Tunisia
84
ec.. Qatar
78
bw.. Kyrgyzstan
87
d.. Korea, North
105
e.. Taiwan
104
n.. China
100
p.. Singapore
100
y.. Mongolia
98
ae.. Finland
97
ai.. Belarus
96
al.. Ukraine
96
an.. Vietnam
96
ao.. Malta
95
ap.. Moldova
95
au.. Armenia
93
ax.. Georgia
93
az.. Kazakhstan
93
ba.. Macedonia
93
bb.. Yugoslavia
93
bc.. Brunei
92
bd.. Cyprus
92
bf.. Malaysia
92
bg.. Costa Rica
91
bi.. Albania
90
bk.. Peru
90
bm.. Cambodia
89
bo.. Suriname 89
bp.. Laos
89
br.. Venezuela
88
bt.. Brazil
87
bu.. Iraq
87
by.. Samoa (Western) 87
bz.. Syria
87
ca.. Tajikistan
87
cb.. Tonga
87
cc.. Turkmenistan
87
cd.. Uzbekistan
87
ce.. Burma (Myanmar)
86
cf.. Philippines
86
cg.. Lebanon
86
ch.. Bolivia
85
ci.. Cuba
85
cj.. Morocco
85
ck.. Paraguay
85
cl.. Algeria
84
cm.. Dominican Republic
84
cn.. El Salvador
84
co.. Guyana
84
cp.. Honduras 84
cq.. Iran
84
cr.. Kiribati
84
cs.. Libya
84
ct.. Marshall Islands 84
cu.. Micronesia
84
cv.. Nicaragua 84
cw.. Panama
84
cx.. Papua New Guinea
84
cy.. Puerto Rico
84
cz.. Solomon Islands 84
db.. Vanuatu
84
dc.. Afghanistan
83
dd.. Bahrain
83
de.. Belize
83
df.. Egypt
83
dg.. Kuwait
83
dh.. Oman
83
di.. Saudi Arabia
83
dj.. United Arab Emirates
83
dk.. Yemen
83
dl.. Bangladesh
81
dm.. India
81
dn.. Maldives
81
do.. Mauritius 81
dp.. Pakistan
81
dq.. Seychelles
81
dr.. Sri Lanka
81
ds.. Ecuador
80
dt.. Trinidad & Tobago
80
du.. Comoros
79
dv.. Guatemala
79
dw.. Madagascar
79
dx.. Barbados 78
dy.. Bahamas
78
dz.. Bhutan
78
ea.. Cape Verde
78
eb.. Nepal
78
ed.. Zambia
77
ee.. Antigua & Barbuda
75
ef.. Grenada
75
eg.. Dominica
75
eh.. St. Kitts & Nevis 75
ei.. St. Lucia
75
ej.. St.Vincent/Grenadines
75
ek.. Congo (Braz)
73
el.. Mauritania
73
em.. Uganda
73
en.. Botswana
72
eo.. Chad
72
ep.. Haiti
72
eq.. Jamaica
72
er.. Kenya
72
es.. Lesotho
72
et.. Mosambique
72
eu.. Namibia
72
ew.. Swaziland
72
ex.. Sudan
72
ey.. Tanzania
72
ez.. Cote d'Ivoire 71
fa.. Ghana
71
fb.. Malawi
71
fc.. Burundi
70
fd.. Cameroon
70
fe.. Rwanda
70
ff.. Angola
69
fg.. Benin
69
fh.. Togo
69
fi.. Central African Rep.
68
fj.. Djibouti
68
fk.. Eritrea
68
fl.. Mali
68
fm.. Somalia
68
fn.. Niger
67
fo.. Nigeria
67
fp.. Burkina Faso
66
fq.. Gabon
66
fr.. Zimbabwe 66
fs.. Congo (Zaire) 65
ft.. Gambia
64
fu.. Liberia
64
fv.. Senegal
64
fw.. Sierra Leone
64
fx.. Ethiopia
63
fy.. Guinea
63
fz.. Guinea Bissau
63
ga.. Sao Tome/Principe
59
gb.. Equatorial Guinea
59
25 African nations have IQs lower than 70, and more than 80 have IQ's lower than 84. The average of the lowest 24 is 66, and the average of the entire 84 is 74, so at best the IQ of blacks brought to the Americas as slaves was 70. IF the IQ of the offspring of mixed race parents is a simple average, and since American blacks have 20% Caucasoid genes whose ancestor's IQs were around 100, THEN we'd expect American blacks to have an average IQ of 76 (borderline retarded according to Seligman), consistent with the performance of mostly black cities like Washington, DC, Detroit, New Orleans, and Gary, Indiana.
Koko the Gorilla's IQ was 85, making her a more qualified candidate for "president" than Obama even IF he's at the high end of the curve--which he clearly is NOT!

Did the "liberals" in education [read: jews] achieve their goal of establishing racial and "gender" "equality" by using only 6% of the "IQ" test questions to measure "IQ", and then widely publicize that "men and women have equal IQs"? If Gallup's poll on "gender issues" is any indication, then it's been a raving success: 29% of men and 43% of women believe women are more intelligent than men, and 40% of both men and women believe they are of "equal intelligence". Are they correct, or are the 28% of men and 14% of women who believe men are more intelligent correct?
It's a major moral dilemma for this putative Christian nation, one that prides itself on truth, honesty, and Christian charity, that there's no hard scientific or statistical evidence to support the beliefs of almost three quarters of American men and 6 out of 7 of American women that women are "equally" or more intelligent than men.
After more than a decade of research, this author is familiar with only two tests on which females outperformed males in intelligence, and that's a small advantage 9 and 13 year old girls have over boys on the math portion of the politically motivated National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test, and the verbal portion of the equally politically biased American College Testing (ACT) test. By age 17 years, though, boys outperform girls by a very large margin on NAEP, there are no other tests which duplicate the results of the verbal portion of ACT, and boys outperform girls by very wide margins on all the other ACT tests (math, rhetorical skills, algebra, reading, social studies, arts/literature, science reasoning, natural science, and composite). There's no section of the TIMSS test on which girls ever outperformed boys, and their scores were so low on TIMSS physics that their responses were statistically significant on only 45% of the test, and they scored lower than if they'd just guessed at the answers on the rest. Boys outperform girls by wide margins on both the verbal and math sections of the SAT.
This difference between men and women in academic skills carries over to free enterprise where a very exhaustive Census Bureau study highlights the four fold advantage men have over women in critical thinking, decision skills, earning ability, corporate management, people skills:
| Adding women to the ownership of a man owned business reduces its potential receipts by $323,300 or 55.5%. | |
| Adding men to the ownership of a woman owned business increases its potential receipts by $108,100 or 71.5%. | |
| Completely removing women from ownership increases potential receipts by $431,400 or 3.9X relative to a woman owned business where men are not owners. |
Unless "intelligence" is something that can't be measured, and unless all who believe men aren't more intelligent than women accept as a fact an entity that can't be quantified or measured or proven, then it simply cannot be correct that women are more than or equally intelligent to men. Thus, 6 out of 7 American women and three quarters of American men hold a belief that cannot be substantiated by any facts, proof that the brainwashing of our students has been a remarkable success.
The other evidence of the remarkable success of this brainwashing is the fact that this page has been on the internet for more than a decade in one form or another--and in all that time not one single woman, even those claiming to be PhD's, asked one single logical question about:
Why there's a four fold difference between men and women in these skills.
If there's anything that can be done to improve American education (for either boys or girls--or both).
How this highlights affirmative action's destructive effects when competent White men are displaced by incompetent black women.
Whether or not there may be a specific flaw in the data, the tests, or the way the tests are conducted or reported.
How it might be possible for an entire group to score lower on a standardized test than if they'd just guessed at all the answers.
And, most importantly, how so many 12th grade girls could exhibit zero mathematical and calculation skills.
Instead, virtually every input from a girl or woman has been an emotional tirade which attempted to discredit the messenger rather than understand that their equality boat has a great big hole in it and has already sunk. The usual charge is "you must really hate women", which belies this author's role in creating and organizing standardized tests, administering and funding them, collating the results, and publishing the test scores. If this author "hates women", then consider how much MORE the federal and state governments around the world who paid for, administered, tested, and publicized the results of so many different tests, must "hate women". All this author has done is peek at the test results and put them on a few web pages.
Biased jew-controlled businesses like the Gallup Organization present their data in such a distorted fashion that it is difficult to sort it all out. Almost all standardized tests (with the exception of TIMSS which did report Israel's scores separately) exclude jews as a separate race. Feminazis would not view it as "sexist" or "racist" or "anti-semitic" to merely note the significant differences in intelligence by race and sex, and particularly by race and sex of jews, had this brainwashing not been a raving success.
TIMSS, where Israel (which is mostly if not all jews) scored a mere 466 in TIMSS math, provides an excellent opportunity to fill in the gaps caused by Wechsler's distortion of his "IQ tests", Gallup's biased polling strategy, and the failure of almost all news sources to separate the data by race and sex. SAT math scores by race and sex are correlated with TIMSS math scores by race and sex to establish that jew boys score 458 in SAT Math, jew girls score 438, and in TIMSS, Asian boys in the US score 614, Asian girls in the US score 580, Caucasian boys score 573, Caucasian girls score 538, etc. This is consistent with the very low test scores of Miami-Dade, Florida which has such a high population of jews that the main boulevard is now called "Yitzahk Rabin Blvd".

This correlation can then be used to establish an "actual" IQ which more accurately reflects the race and sex differences shown by all these standardized tests, as well as cranial capacity, than do the Wechsler and other "IQ tests" which have removed the major portion that tests for intelligence:


To verify this Actual IQ score, the known racial and sex differences demonstrated by differences in the NAEP Math, ACT Math, and GRE (Graduate Record Exam) Quantitative scores are compared, showing remarkably high correlation (r-squared of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.95, respectively):



Now that we've established some level of confidence that this Actual IQ is an accurate and reliable measurement of the actual differences in intelligence, or at least in test performance, between races and sexes, the real challenge is to correlate this to brain size:

The one outlier which throws r-squared off so much, to only 0.75, is the one for nigger boys with an average cranial capacity of 1,319, but who score only 78 in IQ, 445 in TIMSS Math, 431 in SAT Math, 17.4 in ACT Math, 247 in NAEP Math, and 446 in GRE Quantitative. All of these scores suggest that nigger boys should have a brain capacity of 1,210 rather than 1,319, suggesting that the actual brain size measurement might be 9% too high. The following is what the chart would look like if the cranial capacity of nigger boys were presumed to be 1210 rather than 1,319. For more discussion on this detail, please click here.
In contrast to the above Actual IQ Score are the Wechsler and Lynn IQ scores which are not consistent with any known standardized tests, achieving at best an r-squared of 0.45:

|
Race & Sex |
Brain Size IQ |
Lynn, Wechsler IQ |
PISA IQ |
|
Asian Boys |
118 |
106 |
111 |
|
Caucasian Boys |
108 |
102 |
110 |
|
Asian Girls |
110 |
106 |
105 |
|
Nigger Boys |
78 |
70 |
77 |
|
Indian Boys |
95 |
95 |
93 |
|
Mexican Boys |
90 |
92 |
90 |
|
Caucasian Girls |
100 |
102 |
100 |
|
jew boys |
85 |
115 |
86 |
|
Mexican Girls |
80 |
92 |
82 |
|
jew girls |
80 |
115 |
84 |
|
Indian Girls |
87 |
95 |
87 |
|
Nigger Girls |
75 |
70 |
74 |
Where Lynn and Wechsler estimate the IQ of both jew boys and jew girls to be 115, their performance in TIMSS puts jew boys at 85 and jew girls at 80, and where they put Asian boys at 106, TIMSS puts them at 118. Similarly, they overestimate Mexican boys by 2 points, Mexican girls by 12 points, Caucasian girls by 2 points, Indian girls by 8 points, and they underestimate Caucasian boys by 6 points, nigger boys by 8 points, and nigger girls by 5 points.
Such a bias is consistent with the obvious, pervasive, and systemic bias of government reports, outrageous media disinformation, and other politically correct persons who almost have heart attacks when someone says "jew boy", "nigger", or "chink" (and perhaps this report will be updated with respect to the name of the Asian classification. Correlating their estimates with brain size produces the following graph with an r-squared of 0.745:

| Race & Sex | Brain Size | TIMSS Math | SAT Math | ACT Math | NAEP Math | GRE Quanti tative | Pub lished IQ | Adjust ed IQ | Adjust ment |
| Asian Boys | 1,472 | 614 | 592 | 24.4 | 289 | 638 | 118 | 112 | -6 |
| Caucasian Boys | 1,416 | 573 | 551 | 22.4 | 286 | 586 | 108 | 105 | -3 |
| Asian Girls | 1,358 | 580 | 558 | 22.2 | 279 | 572 | 110 | 97 | -13 |
| Nigger Boys | 1,319 | 445 | 431 | 17.4 | 247 | 446 | 78 | 92 | 14 |
| Indian Boys | 1,317 | 518 | 498 | 19 | 268 | 525 | 95 | 92 | -3 |
| Mexican Boys | 1,306 | 496 | 476 | 19.4 | 255 | 517 | 90 | 91 | 1 |
| Caucasian Girls | 1,304 | 538 | 517 | 20 | 276 | 514 | 100 | 91 | -9 |
| jew boys | 1,253 | 476 | 458 | 18.3 | 252 | 465 | 85 | 84 | -1 |
| Mexican Girls | 1,250 | 455 | 438 | 18.4 | 245 | 451 | 80 | 84 | 4 |
| jew girls | 1,243 | 456 | 438 | 17.5 | 247 | 443 | 80 | 83 | 3 |
| Indian Girls | 1,217 | 483 | 466 | 18 | 258 | 462 | 87 | 80 | -7 |
| Nigger Girls | 1,217 | 436 | 421 | 16.4 | 237 | 404 | 75 | 80 | 5 |
If IQ and brain size correlate precisely, which it might (but this is not proof that it does), then we would expect to see something like the following, which requires the reduction of IQs of:
|
Asian boys by 6 points, from 118 to 112. | |
|
Caucasian boys by 3 points from 108 to 105. | |
|
Asian girls by 13 points from 110 to 97. | |
|
Indian boys by 3 points from 95 to 92. | |
|
Caucasian girls by 9 points from 100 to 91. | |
|
jew boys by 1 point from 85 to 84. | |
|
Indian girls by 7 points from 87 to 80. |
It also requires an increase in IQs of:
|
Nigger boys by 14 points from 78 to 92. | |
|
Mexican boys by 1 point from 90 to 91. | |
|
Mexican girls by 4 points from 80 to 84. | |
|
jew girls by 3 points from 80 to 83. | |
|
Nigger girls by 5 points from 75 to 80. |

"What IS open to question is whether the tests measure innate, unchangeable abilities. As this chart shows, there are groups with average or better performance out there. However almost every conventional race based intervention in education does not result in equal performance. Only programs based on rigorous academics such as Barclay, and not race such as; conventional desegregation, busing students to expensive surburbs or affirmative action in hiring and multiculturalism in curriculum have been shown to result in superior performance."
The following IQ Spectrum has not been corrected for the erroneous IQ data reported by jews like Wechsler and one of the authors of The Bell Curve, but it has been enhanced with data from the SAT and NAEP, by state, sex, and race to demonstrate the relationship between IQs and standardized test scores. This enables the following cross-state, cross-sex, and cross-race comparison to be made between IQ, SAT Math scores, SAT Verbal scores, and NAEP Math scores.
| Ethnic Group | IQ | Source | 1990 SAT Verbal | 1990 SAT Math | NAEP Math |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sao Tome, Equatorial Guinea | 59 | Professor Lynn | |||
| Blacks, District of Columbia | < 70 | NAEP Crosslink, Beaton | 204 | ||
| U.S. Blacks | < 70 | IAEP/NAEP Crosslink | 209 | ||
| Two dozen black African nations | < 70 |
Professor Lynn |
|||
| District of Columbia | NAEP Crosslink, Beaton | 231.4 | |||
| Borderline Retarded | 70-75 | IQ - Seligman p.151 | ? | 267 | ? |
| Black Delinquents | 74 | Shuey p. 498 | ? | ? | ? |
| Africans (Africa) | 75 | Lynn as cited by Murray p. 288 | ? | 302 | ? |
| Southern Black children | 80.5 | Shuey | ? | ? | ? |
| White Delinquents | 81 | Shuey p. 498 | ? | 347 | ? |
| Black Felons | 81 | Shuey p. 498 | ? | 347 | ? |
| Black Females | 82 | Interpolated from SAT estimate | 346 | 377 | ? |
| Black Average | 85 | IQ Seligman p.149 | 351 | 385 | ? |
| Colored From Africa | 85 | Lynn as cited by Murray p. 288 | ? | ? | ? |
| Dull-Normal | 80-90 | IQ Textbook by Wechsler | ? | ? | ? |
| Jordan | 87 | NAEP Crosslink, Lynn | 236.1 | ||
| Border Black Children | 87 | Shuey, and SAT Tables, 1991 | 356 | 393 | ? |
| Northern Black Children | 87.6 | Shuey, and SAT Tables, 1991 | 356 | 393 | ? |
| Black G12 NAEP Math | 89 | (7) | ? | ? | ? |
| Black US Northern Average | 90 | IQ Jensen(4) | ? | 415 | ? |
| Koko the Gorilla | 85-95 | IQ Seattle Pacific magazine(1) | ? | ? | ? |
| Urban North Black | 91.1 | Shuey | ? | ? | ? |
| Hisp G12 NAEP Math | 92 | (7) | 379 | 430 | ? |
| White Felons | 92 | Shey p. 498 | ? | ? | ? |
| White Chronic Welfare | 92 | Murray | ? | ? | ? |
| Overall Criminals | 92 | Murray | ? | ? | ? |
| Black Calif Math CLAS | 92 | A.Hu estimate (6) | ? | ? | ? |
| South Carolina Public Schools | NAEP Table 1.6 | 395 | 437 | 261 | |
| Malays | 96 | Lynn 1977 (Seligman) | ? | 460 | ? |
| White American Girls | 96 | SAT Tables, 1991 | 436 | 464 | ? |
| Black Reading CLAS | 96 | A.Hu estimate (6) | ? | ? | ? |
| White Unwed - No Welfare | 98 | Murray | ? | ? | ? |
| California Public Schools | NAEP Table 1.6 | 482 | 263 | ||
| Mixed Child of Black | 100 | Murray p. 310 (5) | ? | ? | ? |
| Black Children Boston, NYC | 100 | See note | ? | ? | ? |
| Adopted Asian Children | 100 | Sandra Scarr | ? | ? | ? |
| American Students | 100 | Cattell's culture Fair Test | ? | ? | ? |
| British | 100 | Lynn 1977 (Seligman) | ? | ? | ? |
| Average Intelligence | 90-109 | IQ Textbook by Wechsler | ? | ? | ? |
| Mainland China | 101 | Lynn (Seligman) | ? | ? | ? |
| White CLAS Reading & Math | 100 | A.Hu set by definition (6) | 447 | 489 | ? |
| Flynn's Asian Studies | 100 | ?? | ? | ? | ? |
| Asian Calif CLAS Math | 102 | A.Hu (7) | ? | 504 | ? |
| White G12 NAEP math | 102 | (7), and SAT Tables, 1991 | 446 | 514 | ? |
| British Children | 102 | IQ Lynn & Song 1994 | ? | ? | ? |
| Malnourished Korean Adult | 102 | Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (2) | ? | ? | ? |
| Asian Average | 103-4 | Murray | 405 | 521 | ? |
| South Carolina Non-public Schools | NAEP Math, Table 1.6 | 525 | 283 | ||
| Korean (est) | 105 | IQ Lynn & Song 1994 | ? | 528 | ? |
| Moderately-nourished Adult Korean | 106 | (2)Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 | ? | 536 | ? |
| Chinese Hong Kong | 106 | IQ Chan & Lynn 1989 | ? | ? | ? |
| Chinese Hong Kong | 106.7 | Lynn 1982 (Seligman) | ? | ? | ? |
| Japanese 9 Year Olds | 107 | IQ Shigehisa & Lynn 1991 | ? | ? | ? |
| White American Boys | 542 | ? | |||
| Korean | 108.5 | IQ Lynn & song 1994 | ? | ? | ? |
| Asian G12 NAEP math | 109 | (7) | ? | 559 | ? |
| Korean Children in Korea | 109 | IQ Lynn & Song 1994 | ? | ? | ? |
| Italian 8th Graders | 109 | IAEP/NAEP Crosslink | ? | ? | 280 |
| Chinese Hong Kong | 109.8 | Lynn 1982 (Seligman) vs. British 100 Raven's matrices | ? | 566 | ? |
| Bright-Normal | 110-119 | IQ Textbook Wechseler | ? | ? | ? |
| Korean Adults in Belgium | 110 | Frydman & Lynn 1989 | ? | ? | ? |
| Adopted Black Children | 110 | Sandra Scarr | ? | ? | ? |
| Chinese | 110 | Lynn 1977 (Seligman) | ? | ? | ? |
| Well Nourished Korean Adult | 112 | Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975 (2) | ? | 581 | ? |
| North Dakota Public Schools | 112 | SAT Table, 1991 and NAEP Math, Table 1.6 | 581 | 285 | |
| Jewish Boys | 112.8 | verbal Ann Arbor Institute (Seligman) | ? | ? | ? |
| Orthodox Jewish Children (applying to Hebrew schools in 1950's) | 114.9 | Miles B. Storfer | ? | ? | ? |
| Other Storfer Jews | 110-115 | Miles B. Storfer | ? | ? | ? |
| Jews | 115 | Review of Bell Curve | ? | 603 | ? |
| Blacks at UC Berkeley | 115 | A.Hu top 15% UC definition | ? | ? | ? |
| Texas Non-public Schools | 116 | naepmath.pdf Table 1.6 | 605 | 301 | |
| Blacks in Math Program | 116 | Barclay school Baltimore MD | ? | 611 | ? |
| Adopted White children | 120 | Sandra Scarr | ? | 641 | ? |
| Blacks at MIT | 120 | A.Hu based on SAT 1985 | ? | ? | ? |
| Whites at UC Berkeley | 124 | A.Hu top 5% top 1/3 of UC | ? | 671 | ? |
| Superior | 120-129 | IQ Text Wechsleler | ? | ? | ? |
| Above Superior | 130 & above | By Definition | ? | 715 | ? |
| White/Asian MIT | 138 | A.Hu (top 0.5% of population) | ? | 771 | ? |
Notes:
(1) In many cases, conversions were made from SAT scores to an estimate of the US population based on percentile to IQ conversion.
(2) Koreans adopted by Americans, Winick, Meyer and Harris 1975
(3)American men = Asian women at visiospatial tasks (math) (Lynn / Seligman)
(4) Blacks in New York and Boston are equal to grade level in some grades, equal to 100 IQ by definition. Some schools that are mostly black in Chicago also perform at the 50th percentile.
(5) Study of children of mixed parents of European and Black soldiers found no difference
(6) A.Hu Converted 1995 CLAS distribution to IQ with white=100
(7) National Assessment of Educational Progress given to national cross-section of students, 1990
(8) "A better idea" The Economist Dec 2, 1995 p. 23 Barclay public school in Baltimore Md. emulates a tough private school to achieve 85 percentile math scores with 90% black students, 82% free lunch who previously were scoring 20-30 percentile. Superintendent was fired who had opposed "rich black man's curriculum" inappropriate for poor students.
(9) Flynn looked at studies that put Asian IQ higher and concluded that after you accounted for increases in IQ since the tests were "normalized", Asian IQs were actually no higher than whites might expected to be at the same time. However, he does not dispute that Asians still have superior academic performance in school, which is just as useful as having a high IQ.
This is my latest version -- Arthur Hu's "IQ Spectrum" -- http://www.halcyon.com/arthurhu/ 12422 107th Pl NE Kirkland WA 98034
Note that blacks are, as a group, generally below whites, but it is not difficult to find groups who score 100 average or far above under ideal conditions. Those who say that tests are invalid are implying that performance is equal when every test devised by man shows differences in skills such as vocabulary, abstract reasoning, and mathematics.
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 1996
Here's something else you might find helpful - note Asian females have a gender gap, but its nearly erased by the racial gap for Asians.
1993 SAT Scores Ranked by Race and Gender (unpublished special tabulations, College Board)
![]()

Summary of references:
http://fathersmanifesto.net/einstein.htm
for why Einstein's brain cannot be trusted as a control samplehttp://fathersmanifesto.net/gallupsexdifference.htm for American opinion of intelligence by sex.
http://fathersmanifesto.net/timssphysics.htm for the huge differences between the sexes in physics scores.
|
Modified Tuesday, November 02, 2010 Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party |