The IRS Is Illegal
The 16th Amendment was
Politicians use this
tax money to disobey their own electorate.
The IRS is contrary to
the Christian principles of our Forefathers.
The majority of the
$1.8 trillion federal budget is used to finance the destruction of the American family.
The IRS is a "voluntary tax".
The 16th Amendment is
contrary to the Holy Bible.
Two thirds of those
polled favor a repeal of the 19th Amendment.
MP3 Audio About Section 861.
IRS prohibited by I.R.C. � 7431 from disclosing
confidential tax information.
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 10:16 PM
Subject: Transcript of Hauert
Hauert: Willful failure
to file case dismissed
Hauert was indicted on five counts Sec.7203 WILLFUL
FAILURE etc. Hauert wanted to know the OFFENSE statute
he was accused of violating and would then submit his plea.
Hauert wanted to know the particular statute that made him the
person required to pay the income tax. His attorney
(addressing the judge) "The prosecution has been trying to get
my client to plea bargain. My client is interested but has a few
demands of the prosecution in order to understand the charges
and determine the potential guilt. He has a serious question that
nobody will address. Will the court entertain that question?"
Hauert: "Your honor, Section 7203 of the I.R. Code is a
DIS-CIPLINARY STATUTE. It defines the penalty for someone
who has broken the law. I need to know the underlying offense
statute that is used to determine if I am the "any person"
required to file. The term "any person" is ambiguous.
Judge: "I don't know what he is asking for."
(Looking at Prosecutor) Do you know what he's asking for?"
Prosecutor: "No, your honor, I don't know what he's asking
Judge: "I am not knowledgeable of every law and can't be."
(Hey, isn't he presumed to to know the law?)
Hauert: Could you please bring me the I.R. Code book with
7203 in it so I can show you what I am talking about.
(Note: The clerk brought in the I.R.Code book.)
Judge: (Reading Sec. 7203) "Any person required under
this title to pay any estimated tax or tax, or required by this title
or by regulations made under authority thereof to make a return,
keep any records, or supply any information, who willfully fails
to pay such estimated tax or tax, make such return..."
Judge: "Sounds clear to me."
Note: (In the words of Hauert) "I looked at the prosecuting
attorney and criminal investigator looking business-like and smiling
confidently and I thought, these suckers have gotten to the judge."
Hauert: "May I see the book? (Reading) "....any person required
by this Title...What I am asking is, what statute establishes the
FACT that I am one of these "persons" required, by this title, to pay
the tax? Where, exactly, in the Title is the offense defined, where
am I made the subject of the tax?"
Note: (In the words of Hauert: "I then handed the judge back the
book. Looking perplexed, the judge read those words over and
over again for what felt like an eternity.")
Judge: "So what you're asking for, Mr. Hauert, is the Statute,
referred to in Section 7203, that makes a person liable for the
tax and subject to the penalties imposed by Section 7203?"
Hauert: "Yes, that's what I have been asking the prosecutor
for. I have also been asking the IRS the same question for
several years and no one will give me the Statute of law that
I am accused of breaking."
Note: In one sentence that would destroy the government's
Judge: "No problem, Mr. Prosecutor, I'm sure that you can
provide a copy of that statute."
Prosecutor: (Stammering and stuttering) "Um, ohh...I'm...uh...
not familiar with...uh...that part of the code." (With that, the
Prosecutor lost his business like composure and the case was concluded. The
prosecutor was ordered to find someone who
knew which statute defined the offense.)
Hauert's attorney then requested a Bill of Particulars, defining
the specific offense statute that created the liability for Hauert
to pay the income tax and file a 1040 Tax Return. A Bill of
Particulars is a written statement of the SPECIFIC CHARGES
against the defendant. This switched the burden of proof back
to the government to provide such a statute. After an extended
period of time, the prosecution still could not supply the court
with the offense statute or regulation that made Tom Hauert
(or any American Citizen) the person made liable to pay the
S.1 graduated Income Tax (because no such statute exists).
Hauert, therefore, filed for and was granted a dismissal!
No law compels a work eligible man or woman to submit a form
W-4 or W-9 (or their equivalent) nor disclose an SSN as a
condition of being hired or keeping ones job. With the exception
of an order from a court of competent jurisdiction issued by a
duly qualified judge, no amounts can be lawfully taken from
ones pay (for taxes, fees or other charges) without the worker's
explicit, knowing, voluntary, written consent.
For more information about the truth of the I.R. Code -
"Just the Facts" go to: http://www.save-a-patriot.org/
From: "Automailer - freedomabovefortune.com"
To: <Charles Bruce>; "Stewart" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2004 8:09 PM
Subject: How Many IRS Agents Does It Take To Commit Fraud?
Freedom Above Fortune News
David Cay Johnston of the New York Times authored an article regarding a
couple of really "swell" attorneys who worked for the IRS. Mr. Johnston
reported on a federal court ruling that these attorneys defrauded the U.S.
Courts so that the I.R.S. could win 1,300 tax shelter cases. I am sharing
the article that was recently shared with me. Please see below.
Consider This: If only 2 IRS attorneys are capable of defrauding people in
1,300 different tax cases, what rational person would find it hard to
believe that the IRS, an agency of 100,000 strong and possessing the
unparalleled power to economically destroy anyone it chooses, is capable of
defrauding an entire nation?
2 Ex-I.R.S. Lawyers' Licenses Suspended for Misconduct
The New York Times
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
Published: August 21, 2004
The law licenses of two former Internal Revenue Service (income tax) lawyers
have been suspended for two years after a federal court ruling last year
that they defrauded the U.S. Courts so that the I.R.S. could win 1,300 tax
W. Kenneth McWade was suspended by the Oregon Supreme Court in an order
dated Aug. 10 and released yesterday by the Oregon State Bar.
Four months ago Arkansas officials suspended the license of William A. Sims.
The United States Tax Court has also suspended both lawyers for two years,
and the I.R.S. director of practice has suspended them indefinitely.
The suspensions followed complaints brought by Michael Louis Minns, a
Houston lawyer who represented 124 of the tax shelter buyers, most of them
airline pilots. One buyer is seeking a $6 million refund.
The Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco found in
January 2003 that the lawyers had defrauded the court by making a corrupt
deal with a few of the pilots who bought tax shelters in the 1970's and
1980's. Under the deal, no IRS tax-collection actions would be taken in
regard to their tax shelters of these pilots in return for false testimony
that would hurt the other pilots.
The U.S. Court called this "extreme misconduct", and asked why the I.R.S.
had not disciplined the IRS lawyers, each of whom was also paid a $1,000
bonus for their work on the cases.
Mr. Minns then asked the I.R.S. in which state each IRS attorney was
licensed, so that he could seek their disbarment. The I.R.S. refused to give
the information, saying disclosure of their law licenses would violate their
In fighting the suspension, the two IRS lawyers filed papers contending that
they had acted properly.
IRS attorney Mr. McWade, reached at home in Hawaii, said, "I guess the court
has decided that Oregon lawyers are not entitled to due process." IRS
attorney Mr. Sims, did not respond to voice mail and e-mail messages.
The two men (attorneys) left the I.R.S. after their conduct came under
-For those who have received this message as a forward from someone else,
you can sign up to receive these messages directly by visiting
www.freedomabovefortune.com and clicking
on "Mailing List".
-For those who are unfamiliar with what has transpired to date in this case,
please visit www.freedomabovefortune.com
and click on "IRS LOCKOUT UPDATE"
or visit www.joebanister.blogspot.com .
You can also find archives of
informative radio shows at www.hearliberty.com .
-My sincere thanks to those who have prayed for the success of our efforts
and contributed to my defense fund. Your continued financial support is
enabling me to illustrate, in detail and in a very public manner, that the
IRS does not prevail against citizens because the agency adheres to the rule
of law, but that the IRS prevails against citizens because the agency
ignores the law, twists the meaning of the law, and overwhelms the citizen
with economic and legal burdens. In a school yard, such tactics are called
"BULLYING". In a government setting, such tactics are called
This effort is the equivalent of ganging up on the bully and sending him to
reform school where he belongs.
Joseph R. (Joe) Banister, C.P.A.
Former IRS Criminal Investigation Division Special Agent
You are receiving this e-mail because you asked to be informed of updates to
the Freedom Above Fortune website and Mr. Banister's speaking schedule. If
you no longer wish to receive these notifications you may unsubscribe by
going to http://www.freedomabovefortune.com/mailingList/
and selecting the
Subject: NEW LAWSUIT PARALYZES THE IRS
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 00:52:50 -0500
From: Bill Utterback <BUtterb@connecti.com
Major Lawsuit Filed Against IRS In US District Court In Oregon
PARALYZES THE IRS
If you'd like to
get the IRS off your back, please take a
few moments to
read the enclosed lawsuit, which was
recently filed in
Federal District Court. The information it
contains is a
matter of public record and is provided to
you free of
charge. What you are about to read will
shock you and
could dramatically change your life . . .
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
CASE NUMBER: CV
00-293-KI STEVEN M.
Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE
REFUND OF TAXES,
INTEREST. REQUEST FOR
INJUNCTION. DEMAND FOR JURY
alleges that he is a British citizen who has
been a resident
alien in the US since 1987. Soon after
in the US, it came to his attention that
income tax system is based upon voluntary
Plaintiff believes that he cannot be legally
compelled to obey
any law that is voluntary, and that he
therefore has no
legal obligation to file or pay income
2. At the
beginning of 1996, plaintiff received a letter
requesting payment of overdue income
taxes for 1987,
1988, 1989. Plaintiff responded by
defendant stating that since the income tax
system is based
on voluntary compliance, he had
chosen not to comply.
3. During the
next year or so, plaintiff contacted the IRS
Portland and Seattle by telephone and certified
mail on numerous
occasions asking for an explanation of
`voluntary compliance' so that he could
legal liability and comply with the law if
required to do
ignored these requests and issued an
federal tax lien against him on 7/12/96 for the
sum of $7,256.80.
Plaintiff then filed an appeal of federal
tax lien on
8/9/96 and again on 9/3/97 with the IRS
Portland and Seattle. These appeals were also
5. On 2/5/98,
defendant sent plaintiff a notice of intent to
levy. On 3/3/98
and on 4/1/98 the IRS office in Portland
plaintiff that his appeal had been
than 18 months after he originally filed
6. Plaintiff then
wrote to the IRS office in Portland on
and 6/16/99 requesting a due process
Defendant failed to schedule a hearing and the
sum of $14,609.97
was subsequently withheld from the
plaintiff's home at 701 North Winchell street,
10/14/99 under protest in satisfaction of the
lien. Finally, on
1/3/00 defendant notified plaintiff that his
request for a due
process hearing had been denied.
7. According to
the IRS Mission Statement, the Federal
the Internal Revenue Manual, the US
and expert testimony given before
Congress, the tax
system is based on voluntary
8. a) "The
mission of the Service is to encourage and
highest possible degree of voluntary
the tax laws and regulations and to
highest degree of public confidence in the
efficiency of the Service." Federal Register,
Volume 39, #62
(11572), March 29, 1974.
9. b) "The
purpose of publishing revenue rulings and
procedures in the Internal Revenue Bulletin is to
and uniform application of the tax laws
Revenue Service employees and to assist
attaining maximum voluntary compliance."
Regulations, Section 601.601.
10. c) "The
tax system is based on voluntary
Federal Tax Regulations, Section 601.602.
"Taxpayers in the United States assess their tax
against themselves and pay them voluntarily.
This system of
assessment and payment is based on the
voluntary compliance." Internal Revenue
12. e) "Of
course, the Government can collect the tax
from a District
Court suitor by exercising its power of
distraint ~ if he
does not split his action ~ but we cannot
compelling resort to this extraordinary
measure is either
wise or in accord with congressional
system of taxation is based upon voluntary
payment, not upon distraint." US
Flora v. United States, 362 US 179, 80
S.Ct. 630 (1960).
13. f) "Let
me point this out now. Your income tax is
voluntary tax, and your liquor tax is 100
tax. Now the situation is as different as
day and night.
Consequently, your same rules just will
Testimony of Dwight E. Avis, Head of the
Tobacco Tax Division of the Bureau of
before the House Ways and Means
Restructuring the IRS (83rd Congress,
14. Neither the
Federal Tax Regulations nor the Internal
define the term `voluntary compliance'.
relies on the definitions of `voluntary'
given in Corpus
Juris Secundum (C.J.S. 92: 1029, 1030,
word `voluntary', which connotes an
implies willingness, volition, and intent. It
freedom of choice and refers to the doing of
something which a
person is free to do or not to do, as he
legal purposes the word `voluntary' is
considered to be
so simple and in such general use that it
need not be
defined, it has been defined variously as
meaning acting by
choice, acting of one's self, without
without being influenced by another;
willingness; done by design or intention;
intended; done of his or its own accord; done
of or due to
one's own accord or free choice; produced
by an act of
choice; proceeding from the will or from
one's own choice
or full consent.
further defined as meaning free; willing;
spontaneous; proceeding from the free
will of the person; proceeding from the
operation of the party's own mind, free
from influence of
any extraneous disturbing cause; of
one's own will
without being moved, influenced, or
others; unconstrained by external
influence, or force; unimpelled by another's
compelled, prompted, persuaded, or
another; acting without constraint by
In its legal
aspect, and as commonly used in law, the
is defined as meaning gratuitous;
consideration; acting, or done, of one's
own free will
without valuable consideration; acting, or
done, without any
present legal obligation to do the thing
16. According to
the IRS Mission Statement, the income
tax system is
based on voluntary compliance.
17. According to
the Federal Tax Regulations (sections
601.602) the income tax system is based on
18. The Internal
Revenue Manual (section 20:123)
that the payment of income tax is
19. The US
Supreme Court has ruled in Flora v. United
that the income tax system is based upon
payment, not upon distraint.
20. Dwight E.
Avis, Head of the Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax Division of
the IRS, testified before Congress that
income tax is 100
21. According to
Corpus Juris Secundum (supra), various
courts have ruled
that the meaning of the word
includes: "the doing of something which a
person is free to
do or not to do; acting without
acting without constraint by external
influence, or force; acting without any
obligation to do the thing done."
22. Plaintiff did
not voluntarily pay income taxes for the
years 1987, 1988,
23. In response
to defendant's request for payment of
taxes for the
years 1987, 1988, 1989, plaintiff repeatedly
to explain the meaning of the term
compliance', but defendant repeatedly failed to
issued an involuntary federal tax lien
on 7/12/96 for the sum of $7,256.80. In
plaintiff filed an appeal of federal tax lien on
8/9/96 and again
on 9/3/97, which defendant disallowed
Plaintiff then requested a due process hearing
4/7/99, and 6/16/99, which defendant denied
compelled the sum of $14,609.97 to be
withheld from the
sale of plaintiff's home on 10/14/99
under protest by
means of the above-mentioned
federal tax lien.
26. Plaintiff has
exhausted the administrative remedies
available to him
by defendant, was at all material times
herein a resident of the State of Oregon, has
place of business in the State of Oregon, and
relies on 28
U.S.C. Section 1346 (a)(1) and Section 1391
(b) as giving the
District Court of the State of Oregon
argues that according to the true and correct
usage of the word
`voluntary' in standard English and in
legal English (as
outlined in Corpus Juris Secundum), he
cannot ~ by
definition ~ be forced or compelled to do
something that is
voluntary, such as complying with a
argues that since the law clearly and
states that the payment of income tax is
defendant cannot lawfully force or compel him
to pay income
tax. Plaintiff argues that his position is
Tietjen v. Heberlein, 171 P. 928, 54 Mont.
Kuwahara v. Acheson, D.C. Cal., 96 F. Supp.
38, 42; Brown v.
State, 135 S.E. 765, 766, 36 Ga. App.
84; Coker v
State, 33 S.E. 2d 171, 174, 199 Ga. 20;
State, 12 S.E. 2d 288, 391, 63 Ga. App.
819; in which the
courts ruled that a voluntary action is
one that is done
without compulsion or external force.
argues that he has the freedom of choice to
pay or not to pay
income tax without any legal obligation
and that his position is supported by
Touli v. Santa
Cruz County Title Co., 67 P.2d 404, 406,
20 Cal. App. 2d
495, in which the court ruled that a
is one that is done without any legal
obligation to do
the thing done.
argues that according to the IRS Mission
Federal Tax Regulations, the Internal
the US Supreme Court, and the
Dwight Avis before the House Ways and
voluntary compliance forms the
foundation of the
entire income tax system and is not a
argues that section 6321 of the Internal
which lays out the rule concerning
liens, does not form the foundation of the
income tax system
and is therefore subordinate to and
the principle of voluntary compliance,
takes precedence over it.
argues that although defendant has the legal
right to issue a
federal tax lien under section 6321, such a
lien must be a
voluntary lien in order to conform to the
voluntary compliance, and that defendant
does not have the
legal right to issue an involuntary
federal tax lien.
argues that the involuntary federal tax lien
him by defendant under section 6321 of
Revenue Code violated the principle of
compliance and was erroneous and unlawful.
argues that defendant acted erroneously and
compelling money to be withheld from the
sale of his home
by means of an involuntary federal tax
lien, because the
involuntary compliance thus obtained
principle of voluntary compliance.
argues that since the payment of income tax
is voluntary, he
has never had any legal or financial
defendant and has never owed
anything, and that any and all claims against
him by defendant
are false and without merit.
36. The law
clearly and unambiguously states that the
payment of income
taxes is voluntary, as codified in the
Statement and in Sections 601.601 and
601.602 of the
Federal Tax Regulations, and affirmed by
Section 20:123 of
the Internal Revenue Manual, by the
US Supreme Court
in Flora v. US, and by the expert
Dwight E. Avis before Congress.
37. The principle
of voluntary compliance forms the
foundation of the
entire income tax system, and is not a
38. Section 6321
of the Internal Revenue Code, which
lays out the rule
concerning federal tax liens, does not
foundation of the income tax system and is
subordinate to and conditional upon the
voluntary compliance, which always takes
does not have the legal right to issue an
federal tax lien under section 6321 of the
Code, because such a lien violates the
voluntary compliance. Since the law clearly
states that the
payment of income taxes is voluntary,
erroneously and unlawfully by
sum of $14,609.97 to be withheld from
the sale of
plaintiff's home on 10/14/99 under protest by
means of an
involuntary federal tax lien.
40. According to
the true and correct usage of the word
standard English and in legal English,
be compelled to do something that is
as the payment of income tax ~ which is
compelling plaintiff to pay income tax by
means of an
involuntary federal tax lien, defendant
plaintiff's intrinsic right to freedom of choice in
without compulsion or legal obligation.
that the Court will uphold the true and
correct usage of
the word `voluntary', and will uphold his
right under the principle of voluntary
exercise freedom of choice to comply or
not to comply
with the income tax laws without
legal obligation, and prays for judgment
a) That the Court
will order defendant to refund to
plaintiff the sum
of $14,609.97 plus interest.
b) That the Court
will order defendant to pay plaintiff
and litigation costs arising from the
this lawsuit in the sum of $11,150.
c) That in view
of plaintiff's decision not to voluntarily
comply with the
income tax system, the Court will issue a
injunction forbidding defendant from
against his wishes and from directly or
interfering in any other aspect of his life.
Beresford, Ph.D. (Plaintiff in propria persona)
MESSAGE TO YOU FROM STEVEN
As a result of
this potentially devastating lawsuit, which
was written by
myself, the IRS is being represented in
court by Janet
Reno and the Justice Department. In order
to win, I need to
hire a good attorney to help me navigate
minefield, so I'm asking for your support.
If you'd like to
help me beat the IRS, please mail your
donation to: The
Steven Beresford Defense Fund, c/o
18803 SE 18th Street, Vancouver,
WA 98683. Whether
you send $10 or $1,000, your help
could force the
IRS to its knees and make them beg for
your tax dollars
in future. This is an important lawsuit
that could end
the tyranny of the IRS once and for all.
But I sincerely
need your support.
this e-mail to as many people as possible.
The more people
who know the truth about voluntary
less power the IRS will have over the
Time is of the essence. Janet Reno is
on the warpath,
so please do it now, before you get
forget. Thank you for your time and
P.S. If you want
to verify this lawsuit, feel free to
Grant (202-307-6422) who is the
From: Beaver Cole <mailto:email@example.com>
To: Wjpbr@aol.com <mailto:Wjpbr@aol.com>
; t r u t h o u t <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
; Info at PAC <mailto:email@example.com>
; American Patriot Friends Network <mailto:APFN@apfn.org>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 5:38 PM
Subject: FW: IRS AGENT UNCOVERS AGENTS!
This came through today and thought I should share with the list.
There seems to be a information revolution going on thanks to the Internet.
We are seeing changes even in our main stream media to tell the truth coming
Money seems to be and has been the way in this world to get power and
control over other people`s lifes. My faith in God`s wisdom tells me that he
knows everything anyway.
In my opinion, our world is in a healing and truth trend as I typ and we
should pray for IRS agents...
I was contacted by an ex employee of the IRS that wants to remain unknown
and he told me:
1.That there now is more undercover IRS agents than there ever were and that
they have infiltrated Patriot Groups, are on most Patriot Internet List, and
are the ones that volunteer to help everyone so their cover is good.
2. That many major Law firms and many C.P.A.'s are now 10 percenters and
are turning clients in to the IRS without the Firm knowing about it and They
are getting paid 10% by sending their check to their home addresses.
They snoop through other's files (on week ends when no one is around-check
out the files-& photo and make copies of incriminating information.
3. Almost all large law firms that specialise in Taxation NOW has a Ten
Percenter working undercover as do all large C.P.A. Firms that do tax work.
4. Most Tax Fighter Groups have two undercover agents (so they can cover
each others backs) and usually set things up so they can ask all members to
sign a petition (with their names and addresses) for a good cause, (but the
IRS gets a copy and then has a HIT LIST.)
5. Some of the undercover agents are actually in charge of the Tax Protest
Group and the least suspected by the membershp.
6. The IRS saves more money, and catches more tax protestors by using
undercover agents than they do using regular agents plus the agents get a
good size raise in pay for being undercover and a member of a tax protest
7. That our government considers the Tax Protest Movement more dangerous to
them than the Terrorists or any other group since they are more intelligent,
hard working and usually unknown by their neighbors, fellow workers, etc.
8. That the government is more concerned about a General Tax Revolt than
another bombing of a building or other terrorist acts.
9. Now that you have been warned, BE CAREFUL, & KEEP A LOW PROFILE.
BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU TELL OTHERS ABOUT YOUR ASSETS, AND ACTIVITIES.
The undercover agent is usually the one that agrees with you and wants to
be your friend.
He will volunteer for all the tough jobs such as sending out the newsletter
(he gets the mailing list)
pickig up people, giving them rides, and will always attend all meetings.
He will tap all phones if he can, and plant mikes and carry a voice
activated small tape recorder with him.
He will appear like a successful business man, and dress nice with nice
manners. He will agree with everybody and volunteer to help everybody.
THE WHOLE THING IS A
PACK OF LIES.
1.) The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It
is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products
v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law
94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization
Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)
2.) The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law
Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)
3.) The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921.
(41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)
4.) The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF.
(Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg. 113, 22
5.) The United States does not have any
employees because there is no longer a United States.
No more reorganization. After over 200 years of
operating under bankruptcy its finally over.
(Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the
creditors or shareholders or you will go to Prison.18
6.) The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the
other alphabet gangs were never part of the United
States government. Even though the "US Government"
held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V.
Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)
7.) The UN through the IMF issues Social
Security Numbers. The Application for a Social
Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the
Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security
Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or
what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that
they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get
a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form
SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter
111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites
8.) There are no Judicial courts in America and
there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce
Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v.
PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
9.) There have not been any Judges in America
since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC
v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat.
10.) According to the GATT you must have a Social
Security number. House Report (103-826)
11.) We have One World Government, One World Law
and a One World Monetary System.
12.) The UN is a One World Super Government.
13.) No one on this planet has ever been free!!.
This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been
One World Government. It is just that now it is much
better organized and has changed its name as of 1945
to the United Nations.
14.) New York City is defined in the Federal
Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani
stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital
of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111,
subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)
15.) Social Security is not insurance or a
contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v.
Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)
16.) Your Social Security check comes directly from
the IMF, which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if
you receive one. It should have written on the top
left United States Treasury.)
17.) You own no property, slaves can't own
property. Read the Deed to the property that you think
is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document
43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)
18.) The most powerful court in America is not the
United States Supreme Court but the Supreme Court of
Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)
19.) The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23
20.) The King of England financially backed both
sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles
July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)
21.) You can not use the Constitution to defend
yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford
Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of
Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)
22.) America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED
STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT
EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH
TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers
1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The
Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8
Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication
6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)
23.) Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of
24.) The Pope can abolish any law in the United
States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)
25.) A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain.
(IRS Publication 6209)
26.) The Pope claims to own the entire planet
through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal
Bulls of 1455 and 1493)
27.) The Pope has ordered the genocide and
enslavement of millions of people.(Papal Bulls of 1455
28.) The Popes laws are obligatory on everyone.
(Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4.
Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)
29.) We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not
even what we think are our children.(Tillman v.
Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E.
146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session,
Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)
30.) Military Dictator George Washington divided
the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and
papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Websters 1828
dictionary for definition of Estate.)
31.) " The People" does not include you and me.
(Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S.
32.) The United States Government was not founded
upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)
33.) It is not the duty of the police to protect
you !. Their job is to protect the Corporation and
arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd.
363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262,
Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.
34.) Everything in the "United States" is For Sale:
roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons
airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath Lake? Did
anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)
35.) We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)
36.) The UN has financed the operations of the
United States government for over 50 years and now
owns every man, women and child in America. The UN
also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple.
37.) The good news is we don't have to fulfill
"our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a
fictitious obligation with another's fictitious
38.) The depression and World War II were a total
farce. The United States and various other companies
were making loans to others all over the World during
the Depression. The building of Germanys
infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads
was financed by the United States. That way those who
call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and
"Furor."etc could sit back and play a game of chess
using real people. Think of all of the Americans,
Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were
defending their Countries, which didn't even exist.
The millions of innocent people who died for nothing.
Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in
these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of
International Settlements" is located. Wars are
manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have
to have an enemy to keep the illusion of Government"
39.) The "United States" did not declare
Independence from Great Britian or King George.
40.) Guess who owns the UN?