We must reject with our heart and soul that judeochristians are free to level ANY insult at us they so choose--but we should not even THINK about criticizing "g-d's chosen race"!
We can understand, and even accept, and even appreciate, that our racial enemies, and we have many racial enemies in the world today, would resort to the following jew-coined slurs:
We cannot, however, accept as an Israelite brethren one who would claim to understand and support and even BE a member of Israelite Identity, or the misnomer "Christian Identity", by resorting to such epithets. One who would support the jew cause and fall right into line with their insinuation into our race and communities in such a way, by so wholeheartedly adopting THEIR language and vindictive methods, is more dangerous than the jew itself. Accepting this judeochristian double standard would mean that we MUST accept their EDICT that "free speech" applies ONLY to them, that we CANNOT call a jew a kike or a faggot [which most of them GLADLY ADMIT they are], or a nigger a nigger [which they ALL call each other], but they CAN call their putative Israelite brethren any name in the book and insult them in any way they see fit.
One who does that, and ALL who AGREE with them, cannot EVER again claim to be OUR brethren, regardless of WHO the House of Israel is. They have lost that right FOREVER, and we hereby call for their complete and immediate separation from the holy seed in full accord with Scripture:
Even the PRIESTS had to sacrifice a RAM! Why?:
ONLY ISRAELITES INVITED TO "CONVERT"
There was NO option for "conversion" when the Israelites and priests PUT THEM AWAY, Jesus gave jews no option for "conversion" when He spoke with them and they tried to and DID kill Him, and in HIS memory we cannot give jews and judeochristians and others who tacitly support them [like feminazis and Muslims] ANY false notion that they ever can. By such HATRED of the Word of God, and it is THAT which they HATE and not really US, they are FOREVER lost from Jesus.
Is the Holy Bible really this strict about preserving the Holy Seed? Why would 85-95% of Scripture deal with preserving it if it was NOT? Why did Solomon have to build a separate palace for his WIFE just because she was the pharaoh's daughter and not an Israelite? Why didn't she just "convert" if "conversion" is an option?
One who understands the racial message of the Holy Bible would consider it a compliment to be labeled a "racist". But this is obviously not what judeochristians have in mind when they hurl such slurs. It's always intended to be an insult when used by jews and judeochristians, so it's a very awkward way for an Israelite to attempt to insult a fellow Israelite. For this reason and others, one who would resort to such antics has lost the right to be considered an Israelite brethren. The first use of the term "racist" was in 1933 when it was coined by H. G. Wells, but the way jews, judeochristians, and other anti-Israelites use the term today is very different from how H. G. Wells used it--they consider this to be an insult whereas H. G. Wells considered it to be a compliment.
NO NAME-CALLING OF ISRAELITES
As we are confident in our position and our understanding of Scripture, there's no need to reply in kind and engage in name calling of any of our brethren just because we disagree with them on a Scriptural point, or a media disinformation gambit. We do however wholeheartedly endorse the name-calling of our racial enemies in the way Jesus did, which is precisely what judeochristians seek to censor.
The following type of statements from judeochristians are either very disingenuous or based on the most studious ignorance of Talmudism:
The GOOD news about such an observation is that at least they recognize the vast difference between the Talmud and the Torah, so different that even they realize that both could not possibly have been authored by the same races. The BAD news is that such people SHOULD know by now, with the easy availability of the internet, that the Talmud itself claims that it controls ALL jews whether they like it or not, that the Talmud itself ADMITS that it's contrary to the Torah in THOUSANDS of key ways, and that it COMMANDS jews that they are under the death penalty if they're baptized unless they do so to deceive Christians.
They SHOULD KNOW that claiming to be a "Torah observant jew" is PRECISELY the deception the Talmud COMMANDS of ALL jews.
NOT CHRISTIAN IDENTITY
We REJECT "CI". We CONDEMN "CI". We ABHOR "CI". We know that "CI", or "Christian Identity", just by its very NAME, and by its supporters like British Israel and Herbert Armstrong who CONDEMN us simply for noting that the House of Judah is Germany, and not "jews", has set Israelite Identity back, WAY back. It's IMPOSSIBLE for us to be held accountable for any way "CI" may have been discredited, because we don't represent "CI" by ANY stretch of the imagination, and it was THEY who discredited themselves by accepting the STUPID jews' claim that they are of Judah, and insulting us simply for correcting them. It is in fact an INSULT to us, an ABOMINATION AND BLASPHEMY BEFORE GOD, to insinuate that we support the FALSE screed that ANY jew is of the House of Judah.
ISRAELITES A RACE NOT RELIGION
No, it's not Jesus who's in error here, or who we disagree with, but judeochristians who will go to ANY length to give jews the right to coexist in our pure Israelite culture. Even though many jews might, we don't know of a single Israelite who would agree that:
This is a perfect example of the lengths to which judeochristians will go to attempt to justify their preconceived notion that Israelites are just a "religion" rather than a race. The only way Peter could have "changed camps ... as an Israelite" is if being an Israelite was simply a matter of changing "religions", simply a matter of believing in Jesus one minute and not believing Him the next, making Peter capable of becoming both a non-Israelite AND a jew by simply changing his mind. Even the Catholic Church agrees that Peter was and remained an Israelite throughout his entire life, and that he never changed camps even once.
Furthermore, Peter didn't even disagree with Jesus. He just didn't understand why it was so important that the "son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again". Peter believed that he was speaking in SUPPORT of Jesus, not disagreeing with Him. For emphasis, and to clarify His point, Jesus dramatically put Peter behind Him and equated him to "satan" to stress that His Disciples must take His Crucifixion seriously and not object to it in any way. This is far different than "did not agree with Jesus".
JUDAHITES ARE NOT JEWS
By "Judahite", judeochristians mean an Israelite of the House of Judah.
NEVER have they ever produced the name of a SINGLE Israelite of the House of Judah WHO CALLED HIMSELF A JEW, not from Scripture, not from history, and not from modern literature. Why? ISRAELITES OF THE HOUSE OF JUDAH, like many of us, consider it a gross INSULT to be called a "JEW".
The ONLY Israelite who ever called an Israelite from either house a "jew" was Paul, but he qualified what he really considered a "jew" to be in the following statement:
HEROD, CAIAPHAS, AND ANNAS WERE JEWS, NOT ISRAELITES
By accusing the jews of admitting that they were the children, or descendants, of those who killed the prophets, Jesus separated Himself from them racially by implying that He was NOT a descendant of those same people. Either that, or Jesus was incredibly disingenuous, criticizing them as descendants of those who killed the prophets even though He Himself was also:
So who was it who killed the prophets who the jews were descendants of and Jesus was not? If you believe Jesus was of the House of Judah, which some claim are called "jews", then the jews or Pharisees were NOT of the House of Judah. Were they of the House of Israel? Would the Edomite jew King Herod have appointed someone of the House of Israel as chief priest? Of course not.
If you believe Jesus was of the House of Israel and not the House of Judah, then you could claim that these jews were of the House of Judah, and that this was the difference in ancestry Jesus was referring to. But this would imply that, when Jesus said they were "not of my sheep", that Jesus didn't consider Israelites of the House of Judah to be "of my sheep".
The enmity between the House of Israel and the House of Judah for centuries caused them to kill each other by the hundreds of thousands, even half a million in ONE battle. But to say Israelites are "not of my sheep" implies that they are not even of His same race. Even though both Houses fought and hated each other for so long, they never became, nor ever considered themselves to be, separate races or "sheep". As descendants of Jacob, all Israelites of both Houses, ARE "of my sheep" and Jesus would never have accused a fellow Israelite, not even of the House of Judah, of being "not of my sheep" as He did the jews:
So exactly who:
Who are those who killed the prophets? JEWS! Not Israelites of the House of Israel, and not Israelites f the House of Juda. JEWS, "they who say they are jews and are not but are of the synagogue of SATAN"! The descendants of Esau who occupited Judaea when the Israelites were taken captive!:
JESUS AND PAUL TAUGHT RACISM
The inference in statements like the above of course is that NON-Israelites can repent and have faith, that both Jesus and Paul preached to NON-Israelites, and that we now MUST permit non-Israelites to impose themselves on us otherwise he will engage in the futile attempt to insult us by calling us "racists" and "anti-semites", which is of course precisely the opposite of what the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and Jesus, and Paul, DID teach.
JEWS CANNOT RULE OVER ISRAELITES
The inference here is that "the stranger that is within thee", who are of course the jews, SHOULD be permitted to rule over Israelites until such time as they [judeochristians, not God] make a determination otherwise, which again is exactly the OPPOSITE of Scripture, common sense, and makes a mockery of His Crucifixion.
Date: 12/5/2006 1:53 PM
This is indeed a dear John letter, because I want you to remove my name from your address book[s]. And in turn, I will block sender. It is only fair that I give you some reasons.
will quote from an email to Eli James, as follows:
Eli, Actually I do not feel as if I am sparring with you as I do with JK -one cannot
reason with him. One of the reasons why I am not going to fight with him is because
of the tone and language of his emails. I had some precious moments in hospital in
the presence of God and I find JK's emails have no consonant association with those
moments. In fact his emails to some people repel me and so the last post has
sounded! What is missing in him is this, "And this is life eternal,
that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent". - [John 17:3].
Definitions are still the problem. Over the weekend I read the introduction to a messianic Jewish bible and noted that they associate "Judaism" with the Torah [as do others] whereas we associate Judaism with the Talmud. This is why I suggest that if we use such a word we should say either "Torah Judaism" or "Talmudic Judaism" and so on. This enables us to talk in a common language. John Knight cannot understand such simple things because he does not possess that which gives understanding. He cannot comprehend how "Jews" could come to be believers in Jesus in John 8 because his definition of Jews is faulty, and because he thinks that the Jews of today are the same identity as the Jews of Bible days..
thanks for your prayers and I will not mention motive! On Saturday, I had somewhat
of a surprise to hear from their patriarch that the Auckland Eastern Orthodox Church had
prayed for me during their communion service! I am not a member of any church yet a
range of them did the same thing. Some of my papers are now being read widely.
In hospital I gave out all my stock of booklets because they were asked for. I see
no reason to confine my ministry to CI or BI. I have been asked to address the
BIWF in Brisbane, Australia in January, and some other groups in that country.
you will be aware that CI has become known as race haters, white
supremacists and antiSemites. You have had a
large part in this, and I want no part of it. To you the word
Jews means only one thing and you are obsessed with your singular meaning. But
the term "Jews" is vague indeed because there are Israelite Jews and
non-Israelite Jews. The unbelieving Judahites were antagonistic to Jesus and we
cannot declare that any Jew that is antagonistic to Jesus must not be an Israelite Jew,
even if many are of a non-Israelite extraction today.
Talmudic Judaism is our real enemy and one we can identify. The idea that all Jews are Edomites or Khazars is nonsense as is the idea that "Jews" are a race today. Yet you continue to use the word that way.
Remember that Jesus called Peter "satan" when Peter did not agree with Jesus? For a short period Peter changed camps and did it as an Israelite. I do not believe that you agree with Jesus in many things.
that your presentations are unbalanced and yes, unlearned. Your use of
concordances and varied translations shows how little education and understanding you
have. Your knowledge of Hebrew and Greek grammar is virtually nil. You
do not have the foggiest idea how a Hebrew Stem changes meanings. When
it comes to the word ouda from which we get the adjective Ioudaios, you lump
all the eleven derivatives together to get your hatred object as the singular identity
The Jews. You will not allow Pauls use of the
Jew as per Romans 31, What advantage then hath the Jew? or
what profit is there of circumcision? Much every way: chiefly,
because that unto them were committed the oracles of God. Why
do you think anyone should listen to your ranting?
Your ranting shows in yesterdays email where you say, All kikes are faggots and all faggots are kikes. You are just expressing racial hatred and displaying your ignorance. Race hatred in the way you advocate is a heresy. Preaching the Gospel does not give any mandate for this. I have spoken to you of the difference there is in addressing people to their face as Jesus did and denigrating others behind their backs, but you do not seem to be capable of understanding this. This in effect places you in the position of being a false prophet who is denying the Lord and His Gospel. Your switching of contexts is nothing short of wickedness.
2 Peter 2:1-2 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.
CI is being evil spoken of because
of people like you.
comes to the Law of God you are one of those who are, Desiring to be teachers of the law;
understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.
I doubt if you have ever felt like Paul did when he said, This
is a faithful saying, and worthy of all acceptation,
that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners; of whom I am chief.
Howbeit for this cause I obtained mercy, that in me first Jesus Christ
might shew forth all longsuffering, for a pattern to them which should hereafter believe
on him to life everlasting. Yes, you have said, What is
conversion? Who needs it?. The answer is, You need
There is no need for me to say any more. I will not respond to any emails from you. I have asked you to remove my name from your address book, and I ask that you delete me from all your groups and lists. This applies to all your fellow travelers who are race haters, white supremacists and anti-Semites, who do not understand the present position of Gods chosen people who are presently set aside for judgment. How could the tail be supreme in terms of being the tail and not the head? The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high; and thou shalt come down very low. Why continue to fight against the righteous judgments of the God of Israel? You can argue all you like that God has "COMMANDED us to keep the races SEPARATE", but you have no idea how to marry the two things together. You do not understand the difference between the "letter" and the "spirit". The Law has to be used "rightly"!
I cannot join in with you or have any common purpose in what you advocate. What are we to preach, race hatred, white supremacism, anti-Semitism or what Jesus taught about repentance and faith and what Paul taught?
Acts 10:36 The word which God sent unto the
children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all:).
Good bye John. Sincerely, Arnold Kennedy.