Jesus the Nazarene
JESUS OF NAZARENE, THE PURE ISRAELITE
Jesus Christ lived in Nazareth, in Galilee, so was not a Judean by residence. He was a genetic descendant of the Tribe of Levi through His mother Mary, and a legal descendant of the Tribe of Judah through his step-father Joseph:
Thus Jesus was a pure Israelite who was not a genetic descendant of the Tribe of Judah which may have miscegenated with the Edomites who occupied Judaea during the captivity of the Israelites, and the remnants of the Israelites from the Tribe of Judah who had returned from captivity. The majority of the pure Israelites (Including those of the Tribe of Judah) had dispersed before the Assyrian captivity, most of them settling in what is now Germany. The "jews" Jesus confronted in the Temple in Jerusalem, who claimed to be of the Tribe of Judah, whom Jesus accused of being descendants of the devil, whom He claimed were not descendants of Abraham, were either pure Edomites, or at best mamzer descendants of Israelites of the Tribe of Judah who had miscegenated with Edomites.
HOUSE OF ISRAEL VS. HOUSE OF JUDAH
"who are Israelites; whose is the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service, and the promises; of whom are the fathers, and from whom is Christ as concerning the flesh, who is over all, God, blessed forever. Amen", Romans 9:4-5
What was the difference between the House of Israel and the House of Judah?
For, finding fault with them, he saith: Behold the days shall come, saith the Lord: and I will perfect, unto the house of Israel and unto the house of Juda, a new testament: Hebrews 8:8
JEWS ARE CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL
Was such miscegenation widespread, or even possible, considering that these two races have always hated each other, have refused for millennia (even to this day) to intermarry with each other, and that jews are taught in the Talmud that "gentiles [read: Christians] prefer sex with cows"? Not likely, but in the event that it occurred, the fact that Jesus was not a genetic descendant of these "jews" means that He was a pure Israelite, free of any miscegenation with non-Israelites.
SALVATION IS FROM THE JEWS
The Samaritan woman whom Jesus met at the well complained that the jews required her and her people to worship the father at the Temple in Jerusalem. He told her that the day is soon that they will be able to worship the father on this mountain without having to go to the Temple in Jerusalem, and said that she would be saved FROM the jews [read: "salvation is from the jews"].
What "salvation" could jews possibly offer to Israelite women like this Samaritan woman, particularly when she was most likely of the same race and religion as Jesus? How could anyone possibly expect Jesus, who accused the jews of being descendants of the devil rather than children of Abraham, claim that "salvation is OF the jews"? There could be no people more different than Germans who are descendants of the Tribe of Judah and American jews who proclaim that they can trace their ancestry directly to Jacob through Judah. Not only do Germans HATE jews to this day, but jews HATE Germans so much that numerous American jews clamoured for Germans to be exterminated after WWII.
These modern "jews" claim to be descendants of Judah, but modern Germans, who are the real descendants of the Tribe of Judah, are so different from "jews" that it's impossible that they could have had a common ancestor, much less be considered to be of the same race. The differences are so dramatic, and the hatred between the two races so severe, that the only possible explanation is that they have two very different ancestries, and that only one of these races could be descendants of the Tribe of Judah.
THE JEWS AREN'T
Jesus and His Disciples accused the jews: "you brood of vipers", be "thrown into the fire", "hypocrites!", "babbling like pagans", "wicked", "adulterous", "Ninevah will ... condemn [you]", "you break the command of God", "teachings are but rules taught by men", "will be pulled up by the roots", "blind guides", "blind man", "guard against ... the teachings of the Pharisees and Sadducees", "you yourself do not enter ... the kingdom of heaven", "blind fools", "blind men", "Blind Pharisee", "you are like whitewashed tombs", "you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets", "you snakes", "condemned to hell", "Pharisees ... rejected God's purpose for themselves", "you foolish people", "you are like unmarked graves", "you build tombs for the prophets, yet it was your forefathers who killed them", "will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world", "... ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth", "... of your father the devil ... a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him...", ... a liar, and the father of it".
How could such a description possibly fit a descendant of of Judah, much less a descendant of Jacob?
"THE JEWS SIT IN MOSES' SEAT"
Putative descendants of these same jews now claim that Jesus told His followers to uphold the very "traditions of the elders" that Jesus denounced, for which He was crucified. What an absurd, hypocritical, arrogant, ludicrous, blasphemous claim, one that mocks the crucifixion of Jesus. For this blasphemy of the name of Our LORD Jesus Christ alone, all jews should be exiled from this putative Christian nation.
"RUTH WAS A MOABITESS"
The modern putative descendants of the same jews whom Jesus accused of not being the children of Abraham (and of thus not being Semites, Hebrews, nor Israelites) now claim that Jesus' lineage was polluted because He was a descendant of Ruth, whom they characterize as a non-Israelite. But Ruth was an Israelite of the Tribe of Judah, and the great-great-grandmother of David, whereas Jesus was an Israelite of the Tribe of Levi and not a genetic descendant of Judah. For Millennia, Israelite law had required that any children born to Israelites who married non-Israelites be put away, but now we're supposed to believe that centuries of Israelite law was just tossed out the window because Boaz wanted to marry a "non-Israelite" like Ruth, with no further ado?
Did the prophets predict that Israelite law would just be abandoned like this? No. Did the Israelites hold a referendum and decide to abandon centuries of Israelite law and tradition? No. Was there any good reason to make one single exception in the case of Moab? No. To toss out Israelite law like this would have required decades or centuries of debate and discussion, only to be followed by the decision to retain the law.