Its not just this ONE jew publication which
claims jews are Edomitesits ALL of them, with the
following being just a select few:
· Why would the jewish encyclopedia mention that "edom is in
modern jewry" if it werent true? that is your very own writings not the klan!
why the kkk reference and where is your proof? "EDOM IS IN MODERN JEWRY." The
Jewish Ency. 1925 Ed., Vol. 5, Pg. 41.
IT DOESN'T. YOU ARE LYING.
THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT ANYWHERE, much less on page 41 of Vol. 5.
· The [non-Israelite] Edomites became a section of the Jewish
people. "EDOM," Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem,
Israel: Encyclopaedia Judaica Company, 1971) Vol. 6, p. 378
YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH
· They [the non-Israelite Edomites] were then incorporated with the
. "EDOM, IDUMEA," The Jewish Encyclopedia (New York &
London: Funk and Wagnalls Company, 1904) Vol. V, p. 41
YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT.
from then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a
part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants.
"EDOM (Idumea)," The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY:
Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589
YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT., Jon Moseley
they [the Edomites] were hereafter
no other than [non-Israelite] Jews. Flavius Josephus, The Antiquities of the Jews (Grand
Rapids, MI: Dregel Publications, 1960) Book XIII, Chapter IX, Verse 1, p. 279
YOU ARE LYING. THERE IS NO SUCH STATEMENT Jon Moseley
Again, Moseley claims that jews LIE by claiming his OWN publications FABRICATED this link of jews to Edomites.
SCRIPTURE backs it up, which is about the ONLY time Scripture ever agreed with these filthy kikes, their foul TalMUD, and their other scatological screeds.
Received: by 10.142.230.5 with SMTP id c5cs499774wfh;
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:27:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.92.12 with SMTP id p12mr2087138wxb.1195964871131;
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blackexodus.us (s15.n52.vds2000.com [184.108.40.206])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 30si203554hso.2007.11.24.20.27.50;
Sat, 24 Nov 2007 20:27:51 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 220.127.116.11 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of firstname.lastname@example.org) client-ip=18.104.22.168;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 22.214.171.124 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of email@example.com) firstname.lastname@example.org; domainkeys=hardfail header.From=Israelites@yahoogroups.com
Received: from n28.bullet.mail.scd.yahoo.com (n28.bullet.mail.scd.yahoo.com [126.96.36.199])
by blackexodus.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id lAP4Rnie029809
for <email@example.com>; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:49 -0500
X-Orig: n28.bullet.mail.scd.yahoo.com [188.8.131.52]
X-Authentication-Warning: blackexodus.us: h621364w owned process doing -bs
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=lima; d=yahoogroups.com;
Received: from [184.108.40.206] by n28.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2007 04:27:48 -0000
Received: from [220.127.116.11] by t3.bullet.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Nov 2007 04:27:48 -0000
X-Received: (qmail 65931 invoked from network); 25 Nov 2007 04:27:47 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (18.104.22.168)
by m56.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Nov 2007 04:27:47 -0000
X-Received: from unknown (HELO elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net) (22.214.171.124)
by mta15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Nov 2007 04:27:46 -0000
X-Received: from [126.96.36.199] (helo=elwamui-sweet.atl.sa.earthlink.net)
by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1Iw95r-00068x-HK; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:43 -0500
X-Received: from 188.8.131.52 by webmail.pas.earthlink.net with HTTP; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:43 -0500
To: TWOMIFTG@yahoogroups.com, "'Jacob Israel'" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0
Mailing-List: list Israelites@yahoogroups.com; contact Israelitesemail@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list Israelites@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:27:43 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [Israelites] Re: [TWOMIFTG] RE: CALLING ALL KIKES
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
First, I have never heard of it before.
Since there is already a "Jewish Encyclopedia" that is published, I find it highly unlikely that ehre is ALSO a "Jewish STANDARD Encyclopedia."
Second, it is YOU who is not the credible source.
We have not seen what the Jewish Standard Encclopedia says.
We have only seen YOUR LIES... ABOUT the Jewish Standard Encyclopedia.
THIS is not something CHRISTIANS or nazis made up. This is straight from the horses mouth. Its not CHRISTIANS who claim jews are edomitesits jews!! Its not anti-semitism to quote jew sourcesITS TRUTH [and perhaps the first time weve found an actual truth in a jew source, even if its a half truth]
If such a jew historical source will ADMIT that from then on [Edomites] *constituted* a *part* of the jewish people, AND that Herod [was] one of their descendants, then the TRUTH is far more revealing about, and far worse for, the jew.
How do we know this is a half truth? The statement [Edomites] ceased to figure in Jewish history is patently false, because this IS jewish history, and Edomites STILL figure in itin fact, theyre the MAJOR figure, and they are the MAJOR figure in this very publication.
This would be about like saying that Jacob/Israel no longer figures in our lives or history because hes just a dead old White man anyway, or Cain no longer figures in jewish history, even though we know Edomites were from Cain. If Edomites no longer figure in jewish history, then why do ALL jewish history books talk about it, and LIE about it, and prevaricate about it, and spin it, and finally DENY it?
And how could Edomite blood just disappear from the jew race? Did they kill off all the Edomite jews like Herod? If they did, why dont they just say so? If they dont say so, then they didnt, which means that each jew today has at least *some* Edomite blood in him. Why not just be straightforward about it, rather than saying [Edomites] ceased to figure in Jewish history. And why would it be only jews who claim that the two verses in Scripture which state that God HATES Esau [their patriarch] do not really mean hate, it means merely loves less unless they had some racial affinity to Esau?
The answer; jews ARE Edomites.
Edomites CREATED Judaism, and they did it completely independently from Israelites.
Both the Babylonian and Jerusalem Talmuds were created by Edomites, not Israelites.
The huge intellectual gap between jews and Whites is not merely an ideological or religious or historical or geographic gapits a genetic gap.
Note corrections below in blue.
Israelites@yahoogroups.com [mailto:Israelites@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of firstname.lastname@example.org
NOw, READ THE PREVIOUS PARAGRAPHS.
THE ARTICLE IS
EXPLICIT THAT THE IDUMEANS (EDOMITES) WERE A SEPARATE KINGDOM, WHO WERE PART OF ISRAEL,
BECAUSE THEY WERE UNDER ISRAELI RULE -- NOT AS PART OF THE SAME PEOPLE.
Israelis are jews are Edomites.
Israelites are NOT jews are not Edomites. Yes, there were two kingdoms: Israelites,
and Edomite jews.
AND THE ARTICLE
IS EXPLICIT THAT INTER-MARRIAGE WAS PROHIBITED.
This article says NOTHING about marriage, intermarriage, or intermingling. It says ONLY that from then on they constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod being one of their descendants.
Now we know why Edomite jews cant even read Christian sources: they cant even read their own jew sources, and not even a jew is willing to tell another jew [or to stand with you and make themselves look as STUPID as he now looks].
YOU said the quote: from then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants. "EDOM (Idumea)," The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589 is not there, BUT WE PROVED THAT IT IS THERE.
HOW EXACTLY CAN from then on EDOMITES constitute a part of the Jewish people WITHOUT INTERMARRYING WITH JEWISH PEOPLE? If they are *PART* of the filthy kikes, BY DEFINITION they intermarried with filthy kikes, this article says NOTHING contrarywise, and your *only* source for this is your head [though we use that term loosely].
For simply quoting a jew source, this Edomite jew called us
liars. We PROVED the quote was LEGITIMATE, and now he complains instead of proving your point yourself we quote jew sources.
If anyone LIED, it was not us, it was Edomite jew source [which we dont believe anyway, because theres NOTHING from an Edomite jew thats ever been honest or accurate anyway].
It was YOUR assertion, not OUR assertion, that this jew source did NOT say from then on they [the non-Israelite Edomites] constituted a part of the Jewish people, Herod [King of Judea] being one of their descendants. "EDOM (Idumea)," The New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1977) p. 589. It was YOUR assertion which was a LIEor at least a profound plague of ignorance.
Its not a matter of being RIGHT BY DEFAULT!
Its a matter of being called a LIAR for quoting, ACCURATELY, their OWN
sources. Its a matter now of their abject inability to comprehend the written
word, even a written word phrased by their OWN tribe. Its a matter of THEIR
believing that their own filthy thoughts and culture of death are more credible than their
OWN tribes writings [whch are rarely honest or accurate anyway]. Its a
matter of cognitive dissonancethey think we will trust their
mindsand reject their OWN tribes WRITTEN statements even years after
theyve proven to be STUPID, ignorant, arrogant, vain, DISHONEST, psychotic, and
Modified Tuesday, November 02, 2010
Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party