And "the world's finest justice system"
Copyright � 2000 The Fathers' Manifesto
Please distribute freely, all portions intact
March 28, 2000
ONE THIRD OF THE WORLD'S PRISON POPULATION IS IN THE US
The US has one third of the world's prison population, two thirds of the world's rape convictions, three quarters of the world's lawyers, almost half of the world's Jews, and only five percent of the world's population. At the same time that the number of American men behind bars increased ten fold, the clearance rate for murder plunged from 92% to 63% & the murder rate almost tripled, suggesting that three decades of affirmative action and feminism also gave us an oversupply of ignorant public servants. An American man is 5 times more likely to be accused of rape and 12 times more likely to be convicted of rape than a Danish man, 14 and 35 times respectively than an Englishman, 3 and 18 times a Swedish man, 14% and 23 times a man in Chile, 5 and 26 times a Scottish man, 20% and 28 times a Dutch man, 10 and 30 times a Frenchman, 24 and 55 times an Irishman, 16 and 88 times a Japanese man, 10 and 88 times an Italian man, 54 and 125 an Indian man, and 13 and 1,470 a man in Singapore, yet American judges accept the feminist claim that "women don't LIE".
TWO THIRDS OF AMERICAN MEN CONVICTED OF RAPE DON'T MATCH
Even though only one American man is convicted out of every twenty rape accusations, scientific studies conducted by the FBI reveal that one third of the men convicted and in prison for rape whose DNA was tested *after* the conviction don't match the DNA evidence from the crime scene. Up to two hundred police officers in Los Angeles are now facing prison terms for telling LIES which led to three thousand false convictions in the "Rampart Invesigation", and critics are claiming that this is just the tip of the iceberg. Thirty one of the men executed in the US and twenty one men sentenced to the death chamber in Illinois have now been proven innocent, prompting Illinois to suspend the death penalty.
FALSE ALLEGATIONS IN WENATCHEE UNDERSCORE THIS TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE
Fourty four child sexual abuse convictions have been or are being overturned in Wenatchee, Washington, and visiting Judge Friehl discovered that even the defense attorneys had been misled by the mass hysteria which surrounded this witch hunt. The McMartin Pre-school trial led to lengthy false imprisonments of numerous innocent citizens, traumatized dozens of children, cost taxpayers eight million dollars, and produced not one single shred of evidence of child sexual abuse. The Amirault Case in Massachussetts relied on testimony from children that not even other children could believe, yet the jury decided that the innocent day school workers were guilty of ripping children's entrails out and laying them out on the table, and then replacing the entrails and sewing the wounds up so completely that no scars could be detected. In order to prevent the sexual abuse of children in a peaceful church in Waco, Texas, Janet Reno fried 80 innocent men, women, and children and then imprisoned the survivors so they couldn't tell the truth about it.
CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE
Sexual experimentation that is considered child's play in most of the civilized world is a crime in the US worthy of imprisoning our 14 year old youth for 25 years, while lying, perjury and adultery by adult public servants which would cause their removal from office in most of the civilized world is considered routine, even sexy, in the US. Yet not even one scientific study can detect that the majority of our fourteen year old boys did a nickel's worth of long term psychological damage to their purported victims, as we the taxpayers destroy their lives anyway and add the tab for the $7.5 million cost to imprison them for half of their life to our already out of control debts. Adultery by public servants encourages widespread adultery and produced a society in which one out of five children born to intact families aren't even genetically related to the husband--a national tragedy of incalculable proportions.
JUSTICE GRAY REPLACES GOD'S LAW WITH NATURAL LAW
What a difference a half century makes. Or did it? Did public opinion change, or did judicial activism merely take over the country? Note the seven sleights of hand used by Justice Gray in this one single paragraph:
FRAUD UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW
If you or I or a corporation were to try to conduct business this way, we would end up in prison for fraud. Because the courts did this under the color of law, it is considered "legal" even though it is a violation of God's law of incomprehensible proportions and even though it was done without legislative authority. Cows and apes and monkeys live by natural law--civilized societies live by God's law. For Justice Gray to destroy civilization with the stroke of a pen using such heinous sleights of hand can be explained only by the adverse influence of the Talmud on his moral philosophy.
FIFTY MILLION AMERICAN MEN REFUSE TO MARRY
Is there any wonder that 50 million American men now refuse to enter into such a non-contract, leaving an unprecedented number of pregnant American women at the altar, placing almost half of the nation's children in fatherless households? Is it impossible for Americans to understand how this led to the fifty fold increase in the divorce rate, and the ten fold increase in the murder and violent crime and incarceration rates? Did Justice Gray not know this would happen to American society when he did this, that the US would end up with one third of the world's prison inmates even though we have only 5% of the world's population, that he started a *war* on the American public which caused the "war on drugs", the "war on poverty", the "war on illiteracy", the "war on domestic violence", the "war on child abuse", the unjust "war on Vietnam", the unjust "war on Yugoslavian Christians", most of which were unprecedented and all of which were unnecessary for the two thousand years prior to his sleight of hand?
8.5% OF GDP IS SQUANDERED ON PRISONS
The mainstream media reports that the cost to imprison an American is $25,000 per year, and warns us that having two million Americans in prison is a $50 billion drain to our economy. But this is off by more than an order of magnitude, because the real cost must include the 2,476,000 justice system employees required to police, investigate, accuse, try, convict, imprison, guard, feed, and support more men than are in the Russian Army. When the government hires just one employee to work for the justice system, it removes one worker from the productive side of the economy, and requires the taxes paid by two and a half workers from the productive side of the economy to pay his salary and benefits. This means that each of those 2,476,000 employees really costs the economy 3 1/2 employees, for a total loss to the economy of 8,666,000 man years. Add to that the two million prison inmates who are removed from the workforce and the total cost (exclusive of their and their families' increased welfare, social security, AFDC, housing, and education costs) is 10,666,000 man years, which is 8.5% of the US work force. With a GDP of $9 trillion, this is the equivalent of $765 billion, or $382,500 per inmate per year, which is more than 15 times greater than these media estimates.
If just 10% (a very low figure) of the $360 billion cost of welfare, the $560 billion cost of social security, the $720 billion cost of education, $22 billion cost of housing is attributable to families of these 2 million imprisoned citizens, then another $166 billion must be added to this $765 billion, for a total of $931 billion, which is $465,500 per inmate per year, more than 18 times greater than these media estimates. How can it be explained that not one single mediot took the time to do such a basic sanity check on this false $25,000 figure?
FIGHTING CRIME COSTS 172 TIMES AS MUCH AS CRIME ITSELF COSTS
It gets worse! The 1992 direct cost to crime victims, including losses from property theft or damage, cash losses, medical expenses, and amount of pay lost because of injury or activities related to the crimes of rape, robbery, assault, personal and household theft, burglary, and motor vehicle theft, was $17.6 billion. 69% of this loss was covered by insurance, so the net loss after insurance reimbursement was $5.5 billion. With the 20% decrease in most crime rates since 1992, this figure is likely to be$4.4 billion in 2000. If the economic loss due to murder is estimated at $200,000 each, then the estimated 15,000 murders predicted for 2000 will cost crime victims another $3 billion, or $1 billion after insurance payments, for a total predicted economic loss to crime victims of $5.4 billion in the year 2000. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/ascii/coctv.txt
The cost of "preventing" crime in 2000 will thus exceed the net loss to crime victims by 172 times. The average cost of crime for each man, woman, and child in the country will be $20 each, but the average cost of crime "prevention" will be $3,448 each. The man who will serve 30 years in prison for getting a "third strike" for stealing a $50 power drill will cost his crime victim $15 after insurance reimbursement, but he will cost taxpayers almost $14 million.
INCARCERATION INCREASES CRIME
Not only does the evidence not support the theory that such a high incarceration rate reduces crime, but the international and state to state data shows a direct correlation between high crime rates and hich incarceration rates: those countries and states with high crime rates also have high incarceration rates, and those with low crime rates also have low incarceration rates. There are only three possible Scenarios:
Mixing non-violent, non-criminal drug users in prisons with hard core criminals and violent men is sure to increase all types of crime rates, which supports Scenarios A and C above. It is known from the literature that incarceration increases fatherlessness, which increases crime, which increases incarceration, which supports Scenarios B and C above. But if the average prison sentence is three years, then 2 million prison inmates represents only 2% of the 99 million victimizations over that three years, and it's doubtful that a 2% reduction in criminals would translate into a 2% reduction in crime. Because of the elasticity of criminals [read: the removal of many criminals could easily result in their immediate replacement by fellow criminals moving up the ranks], even if half of all of those perpetrators of these annual 33 million crimes were imprisoned, it would be surprising if the decrease in crime could be as much as 10%. At current costs, imprisoning these 16.5 million criminals would cost $7.7 trillion, and the maximum economic benefit resulting from a 10% reduction in crime, after insurance reimbursement, would be a mere $540 million. Such an aggressive crime-fighting campaign would thus cost 14,259 times as much as it would save the victims of crime--not exactly a win/win plan.
The Christian Party stands for an immediate cease fire to this *war* on American citizens by their own government, the immediate recantation of Justice Gray's adverse legal philosophy, and the instantaneous restoration of God's law.