There is no lack of theories about the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
None of them are convincing though, since not a single one of them proposes a perpetrator
with a plausible motive. A meaningful criminal investigation must of course focus on the
background, character and actions of the victim first. Kennedy's life provides the clues
to uncover the identity of his assassins.
People outside of the United States, especially in
Europe, consider the speech in Berlin to be the most defining moment of Kennedy's
presidency. Even more so then the Cuban Missile crisis. On the 26 of June 1963, addressing
a large crowd from the balcony of the Rathaus Schoeneberg Kennedy said:
Two thousand years ago the proudest boast
was civis romanus sum [I am a Roman citizen]. Today, in the world of freedom, the proudest
boast is 'Ich bin ein Berliner' All free men, wherever they may live, are citizens of
Berlin, and therefore, as a free man, I take pride in the words 'Ich bin ein Berliner!'
It is extraordinary for an American president to speak those words in the capital of
Hitler's 3rd Reich less then two decades after the holocaust and the end of the war.
People in Germany were electrified by that speech. America ceased to be the enemy who
defeated them in WW II and occupied their country since. America was suddenly a friend,
who freed Germany from the Nazis and was standing now firmly at her side against the
looming threat of the Soviet Union. The Germans felt that they were for the first time in
their history in league with the good guys. The effects of that speech on the German
psyche can hardly be overestimated.
But what about the people who suffered from German
Brutalities during the second world war? What about the Jews?
They were not pleased to see "Ein Berliner"
being the leader of the most powerful nation on earth. The Jews had other reason's to
mistrust Kennedy as well. There is Joe Kennedy, the president's father, a known Nazi
sympathizer and anti Semite. Joe Jr., the president's older brother, shared his father's
views. Both Joe's repeatedly expressed understanding and sympathy for the Nazis in the
1930's. It must be said that John F. Kennedy himself never displayed any anti Semitic or
pro Nazi sentiment. But the Berlin speech and the family background were surely enough to
fuel Jewish resentment against him.
Several policies of the United States after WW II
caused concern among Jews in general and Israelis in particular. Anticipating the Cold
War, American Intelligence agencies recruited Nazi officer's who had plenty of experience
and contacts in eastern Europe and Russia. The most prominent among them being Reinhard
Gehlen, Hitler's chief of military Intelligence in the east. This happens, while Israeli
Intelligence is engaged in a worldwide hunt for Nazi war criminals. It must have been
frustrating for Israel to see some of them become members of the US Intelligence community
and thereby untouchable.
The perception of an imminent Communist threat during
the McCarthy era was partially due to the influence of Americanized German intelligence
officers, and partially of course due to the fact that communism really was, and remained
until its collapse, a serious threat. McCarty was certainly not paranoid, the Rosenberg
case shows that American communists did indeed harm American interests, for example by
providing the Soviets with information that helped them to develop nuclear weapons.
What matters in regards to Kennedy however is that
most of the prominent communists, alleged or real, who were targeted by McCarthy happened
to be Jews, which is not surprising considering the common origins of Communism and
Zionism. Kennedy, unlike the rest of the Democratic Party, considered McCarthy a true
patriot and defended the man and his actions on many occasions, even after he became
highly unpopular. That surely didn't earn Kennedy sympathies from the Jews.
Even as Kennedy announced America's intention to put a
man on the moon, he managed to alienate the Jews. He drew attention to NASA which was
crawling with ex Nazis like von Braun at that time. Americans may have known Werher von
Braun as the great visionary in charge of their space program. The Jewish labor slaves he
used to pick up from the concentration camp at Buchenwald though, knew von Braun as the SS
officer and convinced Nazi he used to be during the war.
Wernher von Braun after and
during the war
The Israelis had every reason to resent
John F. Kennedy and they would surely welcome his demise. But that alone does not justify
an operation as risky as the assassination of an American president. Such measures are not
considered, unless they are deemed absolutely necessary. What finally prompted the
Israelis to act, was Kennedy's hardening position on the Dimona issue.
The Israeli nuclear program started
sometime in 1955 as a cooperation with the French. The construction of the Dimona facility
began in 1958. American intelligence was not aware of the project until 1960. America was
then, as it is today, concerned about the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Consequently
the US confronted Israel on that issue. The Israelis claimed that the program was for
civilian use only, and agreed to allow inspections which did indeed took place in 1961.
America did not press the issue at that
time, the inspections were merely friendly visits and followed the rules set by the
Israeli hosts. Kennedy was asking for more transparency on the matter, he did however not
demand it. He saw an issue, but not the urgency to act. That attitude changed dramatically
after the Cuban missile crisis in October 1962. Those events brought the US and the Soviet
Union to the brink of an all out nuclear war. Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev managed to
avoid disaster, but the experience demonstrated the dangers of nuclear weapons
proliferation. There can't be any doubt, that after October 1962 Kennedy was dead serious
about non proliferation of nuclear weapons.
Israeli prime minister Ben Gurion came
under pressure to disclose all activities at Dimona to the American inspectors. Kennedy
feared that the Soviet's would react to Israeli nuclear ambitions by providing nuclear
weapons to their Arab allies in the middle east. Such a move would lead to a far more
serious crisis then the Cuban missiles.
Ben Gurion was faced with two options: he could either yield to American pressure and
abandon Israel's nuclear ambitions or continue his nuclear weapons program and risk
loosing Americas support. In June 1963 he resigns for "personal reasons" as he
explained. Neither Ben Gurion nor his successor Levi Eshkol were opposed to covert
operations against Britisch American or any other interests, as long as those operations
advanced the cause of "Eretz Israel". Their dispute over the handling of the
Lavon affair indicates though, that Ben Gurion and his accomplice Moshe Dayan were more in
favor of extreme and risky operations then Eshkol's people. That might have played a role
in Ben Gurion's resignation.
On July 5 1963, only five days after Levi Eshkol became prime minister of Israel, US
Ambassador Barbour delivers to him a 3 page letter from president John F. Kennedy. In that
letter Kennedy tells Eshkol, that American support for Israel "could be seriously
Israel does not let the United States obtain "reliable information" about
Israel's nuclear program. The Israelis discuss the matter amongst them, and conclude that
they must do something about Kennedy.
The following time-line shows the
chronological order of political events prior to Kennedy's assassination:
distributes it's findings to other government agencies and the White House. Dimona is
1960 December 7
department summons the Israeli ambassador and asks for explanations.
1961 January 10
Kennedy takes office and is shortly after briefed on Dimona. He requests from Ben Gurion
to allow inspections of the facility.
1961 May 20
inspection team arrives at Dimona. The inspection is anything but thorough. The official
conclusion is, that the project serves civilian purposes. Doubts remain but Kennedy
doesn't push the issue.
1961 May 30
meets Ben Gurion. The atmosphere of the meeting is relaxed. The confrontation over Dimona
1962 October 16
discovers Soviet nuclear armed missiles on Cuba. The crisis escalates close to an all out
nuclear war between the US and the Soviet Union.
1962 October 28
Kennedy and Khrushchev agree on a compromise. The soviets remove their missiles from Cuba
and Kennedy secretly withdraws nuclear tipped US missiles from Turkey. War has been
averted. Kennedy is after those events more determined then ever to prevent the
proliferation of nuclear weapons. Israel comes under increasing US pressure.
1963 June 16
Gurion resigns Levi Eshkol succeeds him as prime minister of Israel.
1963 June 26
gives the "Ich bin ein Berliner" speech in Berlin Germany. From an Israeli
perspective he embraces the perpetrators of the Holocaust. Israel see's Kennedy as an
1963 July 5
Eshkol receives Kennedy's ultimatum on Dimona. The Israelis opt for action.
The timing of the events shown above does
indeed provide a plausible motive for the Israeli government to take action against John
F. Kennedy. What remains to be examined is, if they had the opportunity to act, and in
In my opinion, it is absolutely clear,
that Lee Harvey Oswald fired the shots that killed John F. Kennedy on the 22nd of November 1963. Oswald was
arrested the same day. The details of the assassination and Oswald's arrest are not of
importance at the moment. The interesting part is, that two days later, on November 24,
Oswald was shot dead on live TV and while being in police custody by a Jewish strip-club
owner and mobster named Jack Ruby.
Ruby was arrested on the spot, tried and
found guilty of premeditated murder for which he was sentenced to death. Later the verdict
was overturned and a date for a new trial was set. Ruby died from an emphysema related to
rapidly spreading lung cancer before the second trial could take place, and the whole
story was forgotten.
Now, while Ruby was in custody he gave a
few odd statements. At least they seem odd as long as they are not placed within the right
context. Immediately after his arrest he told Dallas police officers, that the American
people will see him as "a hero" and that he has shown to the world that
"the Jews have guts". In a brief statement, that was televised March 1965 Ruby
The world will never know the true facts, of what occurred, my motives. The people who
had so much to gain, and had such an ulterior motive for putting me in the position I'm
in, will never let the true facts come aboveboard to the world.
After he was sentenced, Ruby repeatedly
requested a meeting with members of the Warren commission claiming to have crucial
information, and was repeatedly ignored. Only after his requests were made public by his
sister Eileen, the Warren commission agreed to talk to Ruby. The interview took place in
June 1964 and was conducted by Chief Justice Earl Warren and Gerald R. Ford. Ruby
essentially states that, Nazis have taken over the American government and that those
Nazis killed president Kennedy and are now preparing a second holocaust. Latter he writes
a letter to his brother Earl in which he states:
You must believe what I've been
telling you for the past two and a half years. If you only would have believed me all
along you would have found some way to check out what I said. You would have saved Israel,
but now they are doomed, because they think the U.S. are for them, but they are wrong
because Johnson wants to see them slaughtered and tortured...
Earl I know what I am talking about, and I'm
sure you think that I'm crazy. But don't forget the jury found me sane, so I'm not crazy
anymore! If you know your family is gone, then you know that all is lost and you can't
save anything. But you still may be able to save Israel. By getting to Miami either
hitch-hike or some-way. You won't be able to fly because they will be watching for you.
From Miami you must find a way to Cuba, by pretending to rent a boat to go fishing, and
get to Cuba someway. From there you must find a way to Russia. Then you tell the Russians
how Egypt has been using them all along, but they are much closer to Johnson, because of
what is happening to the Jews in the U.S. Then they will understand what kind of person
Johnson is, and then they may be able to save Israel. Russia will then be in a position to
tell Johnson, that their first move if any trouble starts is not to bomb the U.S ., but to
wipe out Germany, that one thing Johnson don't want to happen, because he is counting on
them to be the master race, also all the other former Axis partners South America, Egypt,
Italy and Japan.
Jack Ruby was a thug, not particularly interested in politics. He had good connections
to the Dallas Police and he obviously enjoyed more liberties then an ordinary law abiding
American. There is nothing in his social surroundings to account for this paranoia. This
kind of sentiment was common among the Israeli Zionists during Kennedy's presidency
though. Ruby's statements are a reflection of Israeli Zionist attitudes. Here is what Jack
Ruby was told:
Nazis established an underground government and control
Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy on behalf of the
secret Nazi government
Oswald follows the Nazi master plan and is going to
blame Kennedy's assassination on the Jews, and enable the Nazis to openly prosecute Jews.
Jack Ruby has to eliminate Oswald, and save the Jews
from Nazi prosecution.
Lee Harvey Oswald on the other hand, with his ambition to become a big time revolutionary,
is told that his actions against a fascist US government serve the cause of the communist,
and especially, the Cuban revolution. The reality though is, that both men, Ruby and
Oswald receive their instructions from Israeli agent Michael Paine.
Michael Paine had a Jewish family background and was associated with communist
organizations in the US. His wife Ruth spoke Russian and was involved in organizing visits
from communist eastern Europe to the US. Both were ACLU activists. Michael Paine had
nevertheless some kind of security clearance since he was working for the defense
Paine's initial assignment was twofold: for one, to gather intelligence about defence
related technology. The other part of his job was to track Nazi scientists which were
taken to the US during operation "PAPERCLIP" and were now leading figures in
Americas defence Industry.
The fact that he worked for Bell
Helicopters in Fort Worth and that his boss was the prominent ex Nazi scientist Walter
Dornberger supports the above hypothesis. Paine's connection to George de Mohrenschildt
does so as well.
De Mohrenschildt was a Russian immigrant
who claimed that he was involved in a Nazi sponsored plot to kill Stalin. When he came to
the US though, in 1938, he started working for the Jewish owned Shumaker company in New
York under the French Jew Pierre Fraiss who had contacts to French Intelligence. There are
some indications, that De Mohrenschildt was gathering information about pro-German
activities in the US on behalf of Fraiss and the French.
When Lee Harvey Oswald returned to the US
after his time in Russia, he was approached by George de Mohrenschildt. It was de
Mohreschildt, who introduced the Oswald's to Russian immigrants in the Dallas area and to
Ruth and Michael Paine. The Paine's and the Oswald's developed and maintained a
suspiciously close relation throughout the time leading to Kennedy's assassination.
By 1963 the higher ranks of Americas
intelligence agencies and of the US defence Industry were heavily populated with Germans.
The country was led by Kennedy, a president with an Irish Catholic and allegedly
anti-Semitic family background. This president speaks in Hitler's capital, in Berlin, end
expresses solidarity with the Germans. To top it all up, after the Cuban Missile crisis,
Kennedy becomes an obstacle to Israeli nuclear ambitions. Israel's agents in the US are
advised to act.
Their goal was to weaken America and
cause unrest within Americas borders. That would focus American attention to internal
matters and away from Israeli ambitions. The Zionist's followed the very same strategy, by
which their Jewish-Bolshevik forefathers conquered Imperial Russia. Israel's agents in
America did everything to:
Agitate opposition to Americas
involvement in the Vietnam war by using Jewish control of the mass media.
Agitate existing tensions along social,
ethnic, religious and racial lines. This effort was coordinated by the ACLU and other
Jewish funded non governmental organizations .
Fuel mistrust and suspicion by the
assassination of high profile figures in every camp.
Mobilize and organize mass protests and
Lee Harvey Oswald knows Michael Paine as
a communist activist, he has no knowledge whatsoever of Paine's loyalties to Israel. Paine
intents to utilize Oswald in the assassination of the segregationist anti-communist
General Edwin Walker. The attempt on Walker failed, but if it had succeeded it would
surely have mobilized segregationists and cause same type of unrest. After Kennedy's
intention to visit Dallas becomes known, Paine hatches the plan for the assassination of
the president and brings Oswald, his triggerman, in position by helping him to get the job
at the Dallas School Book Repository. The time-line demonstrates the plausibility of this
: Lee and
Marina Oswald return from Minsk They move to Fort Worth and stay with Lee's older brother
: Lee and
Marina Oswald meet the de Mohrenschildt's
Oswald's are introduced to Michael and Ruth Paine by George de Mohrenschildt.
orders a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle by mail from Klein's sporting good's. He receives the
rifle and a pistol he had ordered previously in the same month.
1963 April 10
attempts the assassination of General Walker using the Mannlicher rifle. The attempt
fails. Marina Oswald latter states that George de Mohrenschildt knew of Lee's intentions
1963 April 24
moves to New Orleans while Marina Oswald moves into the Paine's home.
1963 May 11
Joins Lee in New Orleans
1963 August 9
: Lee is
arrested in New Orleans over a confrontation with anti-Castro Cubans which confronted him
for distributing pro-Castro leaflets. Lee is literarily advertising his Cuban communist
1963 September 23
Ruth Paine pick's up Marina Oswald and her possesions in New Orleans and drives her to the
Paine home in Dallas. Lee stays in New Orleans from where he departs for Mexico two days
latter. The Mannlicher Rifle must have been taken to the Paine's home in Dallas by Ruth
Paine. It is very unlikely that Lee took the rifle with him on his trip to Mexico.
1963 September 25
departs from New Orleans on his way to Mexico city. At that point in time, the plans for
Kennedy's assassination are already laid out. The Manlicher-Carcano is safely stored in
the Paine's Garage, taken there by Ruth Paine. Lee is heading to the Cuban embassy in
Mexico with the intension to obtain a visa and thereby secure his escape route to Cuba.
1963 September 27
arrives at the Cuban embassy in Mexico city. He flashes his communist party membership
card and expects VIP treatment, he firmly believes that he is working for the Cuban
government. The Cubans are not impressed, they are suspicious of Lee. He shuttles between
the Cuban and Russian embassies. He's desperate to secure his visa for Cuba quickly. After
trying to do so for five days, he gets in to an argument with stuff of the Cuban embassy
and is asked to leave.
1963 October 3
arrives in Dallas after his departure from Mexico city. It is during that time that he
talks to Marina about hijacking an airplane to Cuba. He also tells her that some day he
would become the prime minister of Cuba.
1963 October 16
first day at work at the Dallas school book repository. Lee got the job due to the efforts
of Ruth Paine.
1963 October 18
Cuban embassy approves Lee's visa application. Seemingly somebody worked behind the scenes
to resolve this issue. Lee obtains his visa and secures his escape route in time for the
1963 November 22
the morning of this day, a few hours prior to the assassination, Michael Paine was
discussing the "character of assassins", according to one of Michael's coworkers
named Dave Noel.
1963 November 22
Harvey Oswald retrieved the Mannlicher rifle from the Paine's garage sometime prior to
this day. At 12:30 pm Lee aims his rifle from the Dallas school book Repository at fatally
wounds president John F. Kennedy. Lee is able to flee the scene. Approximately at 1:15 pm
Lee encounters Dallas police officer Tippit, Lee shots and kills Tippit with a pistol.
1963 November 22
Oswald is arrested and charged with the murder of Officer Tippit. The Murder weapon
(pistol) is found on Oswald. A coworker of Michael Paine by the name Frank Krystinik told
the Warren commission, that as the news of Oswald's arrest came through he overheard
Michael Paine saying something along the lines: "That stupid ....... he is not even
supposed to have a gun".
1963 November 24
Harvey Oswald is shoot and killed by Jack Ruby. On life TV and while in police custody.
It is noteworthy that Lee Harvey Oswald
becomes active after he meet's the Paine's. Without the Paine's it would be impossible for
Lee to be in the Dallas School Book Repository at the time of Kennedy's visit to Dallas.
The rifle used by Lee was stored at the Paine's Home in Dallas. Most of Lee's actions
depended on aid from the Paine's.
It is in my opinion clear, that Michael
Paine was the head of the whole operation. Ruth Paine and George de Mohrenschildt were his
coconspirators. Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby were the triggerman. Lee was convinced
that he acted on behalf of Cuban communists. His pro Cuba activism and the attention it
got were meant to establish a Cuban Connection.
Michael and Ruth Paine
The plan was that Lee escapes to Cuba and causes a
confrontation between the US and Cuba which would distract America from Israel's
activities in the middle east. The plan failed as Lee got caught after he killed officer
Tippit. That explains Michael Paine's reaction to Oswald's arrest as it has been stated by
Michael Paine has to improvise and that's where Jack
Ruby with his connections to the Dallas police department enters the plot. Ruby as a Jew
was easily convinced of the grave danger Oswald and his alleged Nazi backer's posed for
Israel and the Jews. So he kills Lee Harvey Oswald. Ruby was a big mouth and at the end he
couldn't help but come out with his story about saving Israel and the Jews. Ruby's
statements create a connection between Kennedy's assassination and Israel. Interestingly,
neither the media nor the Warren commission deem it necessary to pay or draw attention to
The plan to kill Kennedy and blame the Cubans for it
matches Israeli tactics. There are at least two well known incidents where Israel attacked
Westerners and tried to have others blamed for the attacks. The Israeli agents who carried
explosives into the King David Hotel in 1946 were dressed as Arabs. The goal of the Lavon
affair was to attack western interests in Arab countries and have the Arabs being blamed
for the attacks. The fact that Israeli intelligence isn't shy when it comes to the
assassination of a western head of state was shown by the failed attempt on German
Chancellor Konrad Adenauer in 1952.
The position of Michael Paine and his connection to
George de Mohrenschildt complies with Israeli efforts at that time, to uncover and
apprehend ex Nazis every where in the world. Including the United States.
What matters the most though is, that no one gained
more from the developments that followed Kennedy's assassination then Israel and the Jews.
The climate of suspicion in the US that resulted from the assassination created civil
unrest. The ones who emerge strengthened from this struggle are the American Jews.
Kennedy's successor Lyndon B. Johnson establishes
Americas "special relation" to the state of Israel and then he goes on
pretending to fight communism in Vietnam. Meanwhile he implements communist legislature in
the US, and allows organizations with strong affiliations to communism to roam American
At the end Israel gained the Bomb while America lost
her decency, her identity, her integrity and as a consequence the war in Vietnam. America
was not defeated by the Vietcong, she was beaten by the Jewish lawyers of the ACLU and the
propaganda of Sergei Eisenstein's pupils in Hollywood. Those are a few simple truths i
hold to be self evident.
What you're about to read will probably shock some of you. It is not my intent to inflame
anyone. My only purpose in making this available, is to wake Americans up so that they can
see the truth concerning our beloved President, who died trying to protect America. In
many way's President Kennedy has been forgotten
and slandered by a media that refuses to look at some very hard evidence. All the while
this same media has put President Kennedy's personal life on display in a negative way
since the day he was murdered. I for one am sick of a biased one sided media who's power
has corrupted the many. There can be no justice until all of the facts are allowed even
and unbiased coverage. You will see two such examples in this story, where the media has
refused to help those who seek the truth. It seems that the media has aligned itself with
those who call themselves the chosen and it appears that nothing, no matter how factual,
that may point fingers at the so called chosen, is worthy of investigation according to
the media. Most book publishers are also being biased and some writers who have written
books concerning the assassination, have had to publish with the free press just to get
their books out to the public. If you love America, you should read this and then ask
yourself why the media doesn't want certain things to ever see the light of day. John
Kennedy believed in freedom of speech and we must not let anyone take that away from us.
New Questions And Facts
In my opinion President John F. Kennedy was murdered for 3 main reasons.
Kennedy was in the process of changing our money system. He wanted to do away with the
federal reserve...which rips off the American taxpayers and puts billions of dollars into
the International Bankers pockets. Later you will learn who these international bankers
are and understand what I mean. Someone made millions in stock options shortly after
Kennedy's murder...an old trick of the International Bankers. Remember the PUT options on
airlines right before 9/11 that has since been revealed?
President Kennedy and his brother Bobby were both very active in fighting the mob and
those suspected of communism. The Mob has ties to the International Bankers. Have you ever
heard of the so called Russian Mafia (actually Jewish for the most part)? The Russian
Mafia works every vice you can imagine and Florida is one location they operate out of
heavily. Of course, Florida is a prime location for drug smuggling. You will read an
article on down the page connecting Ruby to Florida.
The time was ripe for change in America and some who helped elect Kennedy found out they
couldn't control him. I believe that in the beginning Kennedy went along with certain
things thinking it was just business as usual. When he found out about certain criminal
activity...due to the power of his office and the fact that his brother was the acting
Attorney General...Kennedy started a real war against terror. Not like today's charade in
the Middle East, where our sons will fight and die to destroy Israel's enemies.
Kennedy was also alarmed by Israel's nuclear program and Jewish power controlling all of
our major media.
An overview of media control by Jews
Read Benjamin Freedman's speech of 1961 on down the page. Kennedy worked to stop the rape
of our constitution and our country. Kennedy, daring to uncover corruption and treasonous
activity within our government was set up to be murdered by criminal elements within our
government and those connected to them. Kennedy made it known that he wanted to do away
with the FBI. Is it any wonder, in light of the following information.
Insiders in the White House and the CIA (Jewish Headed by James Angleton) and FBI helped
to secure a death trap for Kennedy. If you look at all of the evidence...you cannot help
but see the picture I lay out. Jim Garrison the Louisiana District Attorney was on the
right trail of conspirators...but probably never would have been able to bring them to
justice...because some very powerful people were behind this murder and cover-up. Garrison
was pursuing a man by the name of Clay Shaw. Remember where Clay Shaw worked? Shaw worked
at the Trade Mart in New Orleans and the Trade Mart was linked to the Permindex corp,
which was a front for the Israeli Mossad and also had ties to Jewish Mafia boss Meyer
Lansky as Author of "Final Judgment" Michael Collins Piper discovered. Shaw had
knowledge of the facts pertaining to Kennedy's murder...you can bet on that. Shaw may not
have known the whole story behind the assassination, but he could have lead investigators
in the right direction if Garrisons work had of been supported by our government and the
Think about the change that took place in every white European country in the 60's after
Kennedy's death. The conspirator's plan was for the whole world... not just America. We
were all set up for socialism (a communist form of government and a Jewish ideology as in
the over-throw of Russia in 1917). Some refer to it as divide and conquer. By destroying a
nations unity, the conspirators can put their corrupt system in place. The conspirators
had to murder Kennedy to achieve their bloody goal.
The Russian Revolution
President Kennedy got in the way of the conspirator's plans and tried to keep America a
sovereign nation ruled by our constitution. The conspirators wanted a one world order and
started working hot and heavy on the plan right after Kennedy's murder. Lyndon Baine
Johnson immediately reversed many of the workings of President Kennedy.
The liberal Senator Ted Kennedy (under the direction of the ADL or Jewish Anti Defamation
League) authored a bill that opened the flood gates to 3rd world immigration so as to
overthrow the white majority rule in the years ahead. Combine this with all of the
to give minorities a free ride and taxpayer sponsored breeding, well you can see the
effects this will have in the future. Minorities vote for liberal Democrats who in turn
vote for programs that are against our Constitution and that destroy our countries
foundation. The fact is, this country was founded by a group of old White guys with White
European values. I often hear the oft misquoted phrase that we are a nation of immigrants.
While that's true to the extent that we were a nation of European immigrants, not
Africans, Mexicans, Cubans and other third worlders.
Our country's greatness was designed by brave Europeans who broke away from the rule of
Britain. Our Forefathers never intended to make America a melting pot for all the third
world countries of the world.
Don't believe me? Try reading our Forefathers complete writings, instead of the propaganda
served up by those who wish to deceive and pervert American history.
President by default Johnson, under the influence of insiders signed the treasonous un
civil rights act that would breed the minority into powerful socialist votes in the future
and eventually throw our nation into socialism and the new world order. Every white nation
underwent change in the 60's proving this was a full scale plan to undo majority white
power in all nations. The sad part is that un-suspecting, mostly liberal white politicians
have helped the plan along, thinking they were doing the right thing. Mostly these White
politicians were the victims of propaganda used to create White guilt over White
participation in slavery. So these White politicians jumped on board the liberal boat to
destroy our basic American foundations and turn us into a cesspool of minority crime and
decadence, which has no value to America's White European culture. No one was against
equal voting rights and so forth, but special programs that have give preference to
minorities and discriminate against whites is nothing but reverse discrimination and
socialism. Once minorities are the majority, do you think they will make laws that give us
Whites special consideration? If you believe so, you're just plain ole stupid.
Bobby Kennedy would have opened up the investigation of his brothers murder if he had of
come into power as President (Which we all know he would have). The conspirators couldn't
risk this, so strangely he ended up murdered before he could reach power. President by
default Johnson instructed the FBI and other agencies to investigate all persons that were
looking into the assassination. Johnson for some reason wanted the Warren Commission story
to be the final word about Kennedy's murder. What does all of this I have presented so far
have in common? Simple...like (the Jew) Ruby said...no one would ever know or believe the
real truth and anyone that gets close to the truth is called some ignorant name the
liberals and Jews dreamed up to make people fear telling the truth. Names like racist or
anti Semite are the words of choice for the controllers when they want to put a truth
teller on edge and hush the flow of truthful information . There is a bill in Congress
right this moment, authored by the ADL, that is called a hate crime bill. This bill is
just another attempt to destroy freedom of speech and keep the Jewish lies of
history...forever hidden. This is the very way these conspirators work, they take small
bites out of our freedoms until soon the only freedom left will be the politically correct
kind. That's where you agree with them or go to jail.
International Bankers are for the most part Jewish. Communism is a Jewish ideology...like
in 1917 Russia. The first mafia in America was Jewish, as reported in the Jewish Post! The
Jewish Post did an article on the first mob in America and yes they were Jews! All that I
have mentioned thus far links to the assassination of President Kennedy. Some well known
Jewish mafia figures
All of the things I have talked about have a Jewish connection. It was no mistake that Jim
Garrison found a trail leading to Clay Shaw. Clay Shaw was connected to both International
Bankers and the mafia. There were others that were involved ... perhaps even some right
wing groups that were afraid of Kennedy's limited cooperation with the liberal left.
Kennedy dragged his feet on the civil rights issue. Kennedy was a fair man, but he would
not have agreed with what went on after his death. This is one of the reasons that the
mystery is so hard for anyone to see. The trail was a perfect setup that leads in many
directions. If you study the facts I will lay out, you will come to the same conclusion.
The big picture is "Jewish" and the facts have proven this to be so. Our White
house is full of these liberals and the Jewish lobbies that control them! Their aim is
liberal (communist) multiculturalism and socialism. Jews control most banking and many
other giant corporations, everything from diamond mining to book publishing.Book
publishers Practically all of the major media and the motion picture industry are in the
hands of Jews. Jews publish our books, print our newspapers and tell us what to think on a
daily basis with their control of America's major television news stations. Our children
are saturated with Jewish promoted MTV and recently Jewish owners were trying to promote a
homosexual show on an all children's network. They will stop at nothing to destroy our
White European values and replace them with their idea of the perfect society, Communism!
It's strange that a family as rich as the Kennedy family is... cannot see the truth. Maybe
the family just doesn't want to see the truth. After all... the way the conspirators work
is if you get out of line...they murder, dig up dirt, start a major scandal or some other
clever trick. Politicians who go against their wishes usually find themselves without any
coverage in the media and if they do get any coverage, it's all negative. These Jews have
been blackmailing politicians for a long time and there are plenty of stories to back up
what I'm saying.
I know many people are going to call me names over this but frankly I don't care. I
believe in the constitution and freedom of speech. I believe what I have seen and observed
in 44 years of life. I think Hitler was right about many things concerning the evil and
greed of communist Jews...as a decent Jewish man "Benjamin Freedman" will show
us. Not all Jews take part in these liberal communist ideas and some even speak out
against the same things as I do. Nonetheless, many Jews do take part and have learned how
to control people with religion and their powerful ownership of the media plus the power
of the purse.
I had great respect for President Kennedy, he was a real American patriot and it's my hope
that one day soon his murderer's will be exposed for the scum that they are. You can help
by telling everyone you know about this information. We owe it to President Kennedy to
expose the truth. He died believing in and trying to protect America.
A Jewish Defector Warns America
By Benjamin H. Freedman
Introductory Note: Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing
individuals of the 20th century. Mr. Freedman, born in 1890, was a successful Jewish
businessman of New York City who was at one time the principal owner of the Woodbury Soap
Company. He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, and
spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his considerable fortune,
at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish tyranny which has enveloped the United
States. Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider at the
highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to gain power over our
nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer,
Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Joseph Kennedy, and John F. Kennedy, and many more
movers and shakers of our times. This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961
at the Willard Hotel in Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic
newspaper of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and
extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to us -- his
warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S.
HERE IN THE UNITED STATES, the Zionists and their co-religionists have complete control of
our government. For many reasons, too many and too complex to go into here at this time,
the Zionists and their co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the
absolute monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, but let
me show you what happened while we were all asleep.
What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few people here my
age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by Great Britain, France, and
Russia; and on the other side by Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Turkey.
Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but won it actually.
The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, had swept all the convoys from
the Atlantic Ocean.
Great Britain stood there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply
-- and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. They had lost
600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of Verdun on the Somme. The Russian
army was defecting, they were picking up their toys and going home, they didn't want to
play war anymore, they didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed.
Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed the border
into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. They offered England a
negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status quo ante basis. That means: "Let's
call the war off, and let room. There was absolutely no reason for World War I to be our
war. We were railroaded into -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war
merely so that the Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that
the people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we went into
World War I.
After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: "Well,
we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in writing that shows that
you are going to keep your bargain and give us Palestine after you win the war." They
didn't know whether the war would last another year or another ten years. So they started
to work out a receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very
cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all about. And that
was called the Balfour Declaration.
The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the Zionists what they
had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this
great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar
bill. I don't think I could make it more emphatic than that.
That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The United States
crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, and the Germans went to Paris
for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation
representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what
happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and
parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of
European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for
the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans,
for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game!
That's why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time
realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped
onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any
That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized this, they
naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been better off in any country
in the world than they had been in Germany. You had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100
times as important in industry and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had
Mr. Balin, who owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the
Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the Hohenzollern
family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big merchant bankers -- the biggest
in the world. The Jews were doing very well in Germany. No question about that. The
Germans felt: "Well, that was quite a sellout."
It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: Suppose the United
States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were winning. And we told the Soviet
Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you peace terms. Let's forget the whole
thing." And all of a sudden Red China came into the war as an ally of the Soviet
Union. And throwing them into the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with
reparations the likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after
that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our Chinese
citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens working with us, were
selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was through them that Red China was brought
into the war against us. How would we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I
don't think that one of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be
enough convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel.
Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to them: from
1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, and the Jews had to
scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And Germany gave them refuge. And they
were treated very nicely. And here they had sold Germany down the river for no reason at
all other than the fact that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish
Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read about in
connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 wrote in all their
papers -- and the press was filled with their statements -- that the feeling against the
Jews in Germany is due to the fact that they realized that this great defeat was brought
about by Jewish intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews
themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered that a glass of
Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner Beer. There was no religious
feeling. There was no sentiment against those people merely on account of their religious
belief. It was all political. It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared
in Germany whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema'
Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in
the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due to one thing:
the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing defeat.
And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which Germany was
responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being successful. They built up a big
They built up world trade. You must remember that Germany at the time of the French
Revolution consisted of 300 small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth.
Three hundred separate little political entities. And between that time, between the times
of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And within 50 years they
became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was rivalling Great Britain's, they
were doing business all over the world, they could undersell anybody, they could make
better products. What happened as a result of that?
There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down Germany. There
isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason why those three countries
decided to wipe Germany off the map politically.
When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally
resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair.
Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of
the State Department, wrote in his book, and quoted from a State Department document
written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate
the so-called camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very fine
condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. And they were filled
with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, because the Jews happened to comprise
about 98 per cent of the Communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests
there, and ministers, and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international
Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria for a few days.
Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other Jews took over the government for
three days. In fact, when the Kaiser ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought
the Communists were going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to
meet the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. After the
Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still working, trying to get back
into their former status, and the Germans fought them in every way they could without
hurting a single hair on anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this
country, the Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't fight
one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the Jews in Germany. And
at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million Germans, and there were only 460,000
Jews. About one half of one per cent of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they
controlled all the press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in
with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically everything.
The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to really understand
that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans resented that.
The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, discriminated
against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same way that we would shun the
Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or anyone in this country who had sold us out
to an enemy and brought about our defeat.
After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews from every
country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And they said to Germany:
"You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his former position, whether he was
a Communist or no matter what he was. You can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the
world, are serving an ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told
them. So what did the Jews do?
In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews in Amsterdam,
the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was the head of the American
delegation and the president of the whole conference, came to the United States and went
from the steamer to the studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio
broadcast throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the
world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a sacred conflict
against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into surrender. We are going to use a
world-wide boycott against them. That will destroy them because they are dependent upon
their export business." And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had
to be imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they exported. So
if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's population would have to starve.
There was just not enough food for more than one third of the population. Now in this
declaration, which I have here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7,
1933, Mr. Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of
self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National Recovery
Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody was to be boycotted
unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, and which was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. Nevertheless, the Jews of the world
declared a boycott against Germany, and it was so effective that you couldn't find one
thing in any store anywhere in the world with the words "made in Germany" on it.
In fact, an executive of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of
dollars worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were boycotted if
anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they were picketed
with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, something like
these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy
chain, which was controlled by a family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman
found stockings there which came from Chemnitz, marked "made in Germany." Well,
they were cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been
observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've seen any cotton
stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of people walking around with
signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so forth. Now up to that
time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in Germany. There was no
suffering, there was no starvation, there was no murder, there was nothing.
Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott against us
and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries come to a standstill? Who
are they to do that to us?" They naturally resented it. Certainly they painted
swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why should a German go in and give his money to a
storekeeper who was part of a boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering
to the Jews of the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to
be? Well, it was ridiculous.
The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young Jew from
Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German official, that the
Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in Germany. And you found them then
breaking windows and having street fights and so forth.
Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, but
it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only reason that there was
any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they were responsible for World War I and for
this world-wide boycott. Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because
after this thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany to
lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive.
In the meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided that
Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. And the Germans
decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. And they started to re-arm.
In November 1933 the United States recognized the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was
becoming very powerful, and Germany realized that "Our turn was going to come soon,
unless we are strong." The same as we in this country are saying today, "Our
turn is going to come soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or
84 billion dollars for defense.
Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little Jews in Moscow that took over Russia,
and then, in their devious ways, took over control of many other countries of the world.
For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we cannot emerge
a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know that nuclear bombs are
measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term used to describe one million tons of
TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they
were first developed. Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of
200 megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet Union have.
What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a nuclear war,
humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will take place as the curtain
goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 was World War II, Act 3 is going to be
World War III. The Jews of the world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere,
are determined that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently
retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just as true as I
am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have also read it, and it is
known all over the world.
What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may be on their
way to that war tonight; and you you don't know it any more than you knew that in 1916 in
London the Zionists made a deal with the British War Cabinet to send your sons to war in
Europe. Did you know it at that time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You
weren't permitted to know it.
Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. Other insiders knew it.
Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison to Henry
Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was elected, and there was
talk around the office there. I was "confidential man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr.,
who was chairman of the finance committee, and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells,
the treasurer. So I sat in these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table,
and all the others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated
income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them indoctrinate him with
the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President Wilson were just as close as the two
fingers on this hand. President Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to
determining what was going on as a newborn baby.
That is how they got us into World War I, while we all slept. They sent our boys over
there to be slaughtered. For what? So the Jews can have Palestine as their
"commonwealth." They've fooled you so much that you don't know whether you're
coming or going.
Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you find has
told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't know what state you
come from, but in New York state that is the way a judge addresses a jury. If that witness
told one lie, disregard his testimony.
What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they are known as
Jews. I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as so-called Jews, because I know
what they are.) The eastern European Jews, who form 92 per cent of the world's population
of those people who call themselves Jews, were originally Khazars. They were a warlike
tribe who lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the Asiatics
drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large Khazar kingdom of 800,000
square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, nor did many other European countries.
The Khazar kingdom was the biggest country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that
when the other monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers.
That's how big and powerful they were.
They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into the details of
But that was their religion, as it was also the religion of many other pagans and
barbarians elsewhere in the world. The Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy
of his kingdom that he decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either
Christianity, Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By
spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out
so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the Talmudic
schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, and opened up synagogues
and schools, and his people became what we call Jews. There wasn't one of them who had an
ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy Land.
Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. Not one of them! And
yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support their armed insurrections in
Palestine by saying, "You want to help repatriate God's Chosen People to their
Promised Land, their ancestral home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one
of our boys as your Lord and Savior.
You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you worship a Jew, and we're Jews."
But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish were converted.
It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," as it would be to
call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed only died in 620 A.D., and
since then 54 million Chinese have accepted Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine,
in China, 2,000 miles away from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if
the 54 million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they
were lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must be crazy.
All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its origin in Mecca, in
Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became Christians, nobody dumped them in the
ocean and imported to the Holy Land a new crop of inhabitants.
They hadn't become a different people. They were the same people, but they had accepted
Christianity as a religious faith.
These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a Mongoloid race who
were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because their king took the Talmudic faith,
they had no choice in the matter. Just the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic,
everybody had to be a Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became
what we call today Jews.
Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world to say,
"We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's Chosen People to their
ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could there be a bigger lie than that?
Because they control the newspapers, the magazines, the radio, the television, the book
publishing business, and because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians
on the soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you believe that
lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often enough. You wouldn't call black
black anymore -- you'd start to call black white. And nobody could blame you.
That is one of the great lies of history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has
befallen the world.
Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so sacred to them? I
was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give
When, on the Day of Atonement, you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first
prayer that you recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times
a short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an agreement with God
Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make during the next twelve months
shall be null and void. The oath shall not be an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the
pledge shall not be a pledge. They shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud
teaches that whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol Nidre
prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted from fulfilling
them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can depend upon their loyalty as much
as the Germans depended upon it in 1916.
We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same reason.
Salandria is one of the first to point to the work of the 'guerrilla journalism' of Life
Mag, and he acknowledges the past work of Life Mag's Isaac Don Levine, who played a
central role in the Alger Hiss case, exposed Trotsky's assassin as a Soviet agent, bought
and suppressed the Zapruder film for Life Mag and wrapped up the publishing rights to
Marina's story from the gitgo
Who owns Time Life is simple! JEWS!
That means Jews own the rights to the Zappruder film and Marina Oswald's story.
Jim Garrison was interested in Clay Shaws affiliation with the Permindex Corporation. The
interesting thing is that Garrison was not seeing the same thing I am seeing and was
looking more for what he considered a Nazi plot.... his investigation does lead in the
right direction, even though it didn't find any Nazi's. It found some high ranking Jewish
businessmen and their Jewish Mafia ties.
The site above makes some very factual statements. For instance......why would the
Russians or Cuba make it so obvious with the Oswald connection. They would be risking
nuclear destruction from the USA.
This just shows how stupid it is for anyone to believe Oswald acted alone....if at all.
PERMINDEX was a corporate front, headed by Major Louis M. Bloomfield of Canada. Clay Shaw
operated a division of PERMINDEX in New Orleans at the International Trade Mart. The
connections between Clay Shaw, David Ferrie and Lee Harvey Oswald have, at this time, been
proven by documentary and photographic evidence, despite myriad attempts to discredit the
Before you can understand the Federal Reserve, it would be wise to know how it came to be
and who got it started here in America. Eustace Mullins wrote a book detailing how the
Federal Reserve came into being. This is a must, if you want to completely understand the
mystery and overall conspiracy. Go and read the book before you continue reading any
further. Go to: SECRETS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE The London Connection By Eustace Mullins
Dedicated to two of the finest scholars of the twentieth century
Be sure to read it and you will start to understand the total
Government Editorial Keywords: JFK, FEDERAL RESERVE, RIPOFF
Source: Uncensored Media Weekly
Published: n/a Author: Anthony Wayne
Posted on 11/22/2000 09:03:04 PST by rubbertramp
Uncensored Media Weekly
JFK vs. The Federal Reserve
On June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was
signed with the authority to basically strip the Federal Reserve Bank of its power to loan
money to the United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen,
President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would soon be out
of business. The Christian Common Law Institute has exhaustively researched this matter
through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We can now safely conclude that this
Executive Order has never been repealed, amended, or superceded by any subsequent
Executive Order. In simple terms, it is still valid.
When President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage - signed this
Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury Department, the
Constitutional power to create and issue currency - money - without going through the
privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full
text is displayed further below] gave the Treasury Department the explicit authority:
"to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver
dollars in the Treasury."
This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S. Treasury's vault, the government
could introduce new money into circulation based on the silver bullion physically held
there. As a result, more than $4 billion in United States Notes were brought into
circulation in $2 and $5 denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never
circulated but were being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assasinated.
It appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being used as the
purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the United States of
America. "United States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free
currency backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury.
President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he had
issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes continued to serve
as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United States Secret Service, 99% of
all U.S. paper "currency" circulating in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they
would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter
of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of
instrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from
reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has
been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would
have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without
going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new
"money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again,
create its own money backed by silver and real value worth something.
Again, according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assasinated, no
more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either, and they were
subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination of JFK was a warning to
all future presidents not to interfere with the private Federal Reserve's control over the
creation of money. It seems very apparent that President Kennedy challenged the
"powers that exist behind U.S. and world finance". With true patriotic courage,
JFK boldly faced the two most successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up
debt: 1) war (Viet Nam); and, 2) the creation of money by a privately owned central bank.
His efforts to have all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order
11110 would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve Bank.
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN
FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States
Code, it is ordered as follows:
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further
(a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
"(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act
of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)), to issue silver certificates against any
silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for
redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such
silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency
for their redemption," and
(b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right
accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal
cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be
enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
JOHN F. KENNEDY
THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 4, 1963
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States
Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
EO 10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO 10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO 11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO 11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO 12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617
The 1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change or
alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999 EO's and
Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any alterations, suspensions, or
changes to EO 11110.
The Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation. Black's
Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as:
"Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which
state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum
Privately-owned banks own the stock of the FED. This was explained in more detail in the
case of Lewis v. United States, Federal Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241
(1982), where the court said:
"Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial banks in its
region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of each Bank's nine member
board of directors".
The Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again,
according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks actually
"Federal Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in
maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending money to
banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board (q.v.)".
The privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the
"money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency,
Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress, put out a
study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what the FED is:
"The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can issue money or checks.
And it never has a problem of making its checks good because it can obtain the $5 and $10
bills necessary to cover its check simply by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of
Engraving to print them".
Any one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power. Now
imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the power these
people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!
No man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the
Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the FED, he
remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world
has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks. The
Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the Government of the United States
and he people of the United States out of enough money to pay the national debt. The
depredations and the iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks
acting together have cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times
over. This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States;
has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this
through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal Reserve Board, and through
the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it".
Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions.
They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies. They are private credit
monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves
and their foreign customers. Those 12 private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed
upon this country by bankers who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our
hospitality by undermining our American institutions.
The FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money to the
FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government charging interest. The
government levies income taxes to pay the interest on the debt. On this point, it's
interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act and the sixteenth amendment, which gave
congress the power to collect income taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power
of the FED over the economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the
banking and academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those,
such as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His efforts
were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:
"Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves
money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states
that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be
reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print
paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4,
1963, by signing Executive Order 11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in
United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve
System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar
bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful
Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for
banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that
non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again
weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
In a speech made to Columbia University on Nov. 12, 1963, ten days before his
assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy said:
"The high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the
American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this
In this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own book... a
true Profile of Courage.
This research report was compiled for Lawgiver.Org by Anthony Wayne
Jim Garrison is talking about Jack Ruby during an interview with Playboy. Here is a part I
But I don't believe Jack Ruby falls into this category; he was just a hoodlum out for a
buck. I will say --- with the understanding that it's pure speculation --- it's not
impossible that Jack Ruby developed certain guilt feelings in prison over his role in the
plot. Remember his repeated lament, "Now there will be pogroms. They will kill all
the Jews."? Most people assumed this was just the fantasy of a crumbling mind. But
maybe Jack Ruby knew better than the rest of us what the master-racist authors of the
assassination had in mind for the country.
Ask yourself why Ruby would say something like this?
One can argue that he was referring to a Nazi connection(Why would a Jew be working with
neo nazis and how come all of the other connections were also Jewish)...but the correct
response is that he was referring to the possibility of America finding out that it was
Jews behind the Murder of JFK.
Garrison also made a comment to his Playboy interviewer that has much bearing
Here is what he said to Playboy!!!
"I only wish the press would allow our case to stand
or fall on its merits in court. It appears that
certain elements of the mass media have an active
interest in preventing this case from ever
coming to trial at all and find it necessary to
employ against me every smear device in the book. "
Now ask yourself this question!-----Why would the mass media which is Jewish owned...be
interested in working with the government.....CIA...FBI...to cover up and destroy any
independant investigation by a DA trying to find the truth that could possibly expose a
nazi conspiracy? Isn't that ridiculous? The media (owned by Jews) would have loved to
expose a Nazi plan working within our government. Garrison...in his interview...believes
it was a Nazi right wing conspiracy...as he told the Playboy interviewer.
I'll tell you why the Jewish owned media wanted to stop Garrison's
investigation....because they knew where the road leads and were afraid of it's findings.
Garrison was on the right trail...but had the wrong ideas about who was behind it. It
wasn't any Nazi right wing organization that conspired to murder the president.
It was a Jewish conspiracy with help from insiders in our government.
This link shows some pictures of the hobo's in Dallas and their resembalance to key CIA
This could be some of the shooters.
The theory about Cuba and Castro doesn't hold up. If this was an assassination because
Kennedy was deemed soft on communism...then how come 40 years after Kennedy's death Castro
is still in Cuba and Russia remained communist until 1989.
These people were barking up the wrong tree. They have some of the players right...but not
the motive for the crime.
This is what makes sense and is where all trails lead to. I'll list them!!!
The Media(Jewish Owned and dominated)Remember Garrisons remarks!
JFK's concern over Israel's nuclear program(Jewish)
JFK's sympathy towards Germany and the Nuremberg Trials(one thing the Jews can't
stand...anyone that questions WW2 and the so called Hollocaust)
JFK's steps to demolish the Federal Reserve(Jewish)
JFK's pro Arab status(anti Jewish in Jew eyes)
JFK'and Bobby's tuff stance against the mob and communism in America(remember the mob ties
in with the Jewish elite and the bankers and communism is a Jewish idea of government as
brought to Russia in 1917) JFK was worried about communism here at home...not sending
troops all over the world to fight!
Jack Rubys own words( They will kill all Jews now....Ruby said this over and over while in
jail) He was worried if the American people ever found out...there might be a real
Hollocaust for the Jews)
The World agenda in all White Nations after JFK's death(massive non White immigration and
civil rights for socialist votes in the future.....would usher us into a socialist
concept....while the elite rule with all the money and power under super capitalism which
only benifits themselves and we get what crumbs we can compete for that are left over.
The destruction of White unity and power in every nation. They use the media and religion
to keep us bickering about petty bull while they continue their agenda.
They use us to fight the wars and do all the dirty work..like brainwashed puppets and flag
waving idiots...who don't have a clue about what is really going on behind the scenes.
We are participating in our own destruction by not standing up for the real constitution
and demanding change. We are allowing this to take place...while they use cute little pre
programed propaganda words of brotherhood for all, diversity and love as the way to
eternal peace...meanwhile they murder anyone who doesn't go along, start wars and rape the
the people and the constitution of this once great country. It's time for people to open
BOBBY BAKER, ex-Senate Secretary; ROY M. COHN, New York attorney and head of the Jewish
League Against Communism; CLIFFORD JONES, ex-Lieutenant Governor of Nevada, Democratic
National Committeeman, and business partner with Bobby Baker and L.J. McWillie, L.J.
MCWILLIE, of Las Vegas, Nevada a partner in Havana gambling with Ruby and Jones; L.M.
BLOOMFIELD of Montreal, a long time friend and agent of J. Edgar Hoover.
Notice how they set up a front like they were fighting communism. They were the ones that
ushered communism into Russia. (notice Roy M. Cohn). In one site they are trying to push
Ruby off as a White Russian Czarist.
(What this tells me is that Ruby's family was from Russia and was part of the Jewish
mafia....a true Bolshevik. I had no idea Ruby's family was from Russia...this is futher
evidence of my story and it's connections to Jews! ( Read about the Bolshevik Revolution)
Here is a little statement printed about Ruby!!!......
Ruby's constant use of the words "pogroms against the Jews" reveal his close
affiliation with and his deeply ingrained awareness of his family's Russian Czarist
Notice how Bloomfield's name comes up again as a close friend of J. Edgar Hoover! Remember
who Bloomfield was!
PERMINDEX was a corporate front, headed by Major Louis M. Bloomfield of Canada.
I hope your eyes are starting to see what all of this means. Can there be any doubt...even
though we cannot prove this. This was a Jewish led conspiracy no doubt...with other
players that went along for their own greedy reasons.
President Kennedy also appreciated the
friendship this author(Benjamin Freedman) demonstrated for his father, Ambassador Kennedy.
Ambassador Kennedy was blackmailed
by President Roosevelt. President Roosevelt told Ambassador Kennedy not to write the book
he planned to
write. President Roosevelt removed Ambassador Kennedy as Ambassador to the Court of St.
James in London
for circulating what Neville Chamberlain told Ambassador Kennedy in London in l938.
The Senior Kennedy Liquidated Politically by Franklin Roosevelt
for Reporting Talmudic Conspiracy
Ambassador Kennedy(JFK's father) reported to Washington in 1938 that Neville Chamberlain
told him that the United States
and Talmudists throughout the world forced Great Britain into the Second World War.
Chamberlain also told
Ambassador Kennedy in 1938 that Great Britain had nothing with which to fight Germany,
that Great Britain
should not risk going to war against Germany. Chamberlain complained to Ambassador Kennedy
States Ambassador to France William C. Bullit in 1938 was urging President Roosevelt that
Germany must be
"faced down" in their attitude towards Poland in the Danzig Corridor matter.
President Roosevelt recalled
Ambassador Kennedy to silence him. Ambassador Kennedy planned to return to the United
States to write a
book telling what he knew that he thought the grass roots population of the United States
should be told.
President Roosevelt sent for Ambassador Kennedy upon his return to the United States to
come to Washington
to see him. President Roosevelt told Ambassador Kennedy that he had heard that he was
planning to write a
book which he asked him not to do. After Ambassador Kennedy's unpleasant meeting with
in Washington after his recall from London for daring to circulate what Chamberlain had
told him about
Talmudists, his ambition in life was to see one of his sons in the White House as
president of the United States.
WHAT DOES ALL OF THIS MEAN? I'LL TELL YOU!!!!
This means that JFK was well aware of the things that had taken place during WW2 and
after. His father had passed the information on to John and Bobby. The author tries to
make it sound like JFK was in support of Israel's goals....but his actions during office
clearly show a different story. Remember JFK's statement that
"before he left office he must tell the American people of an evil against our
I think the elder Kennedy wanted his son in the White house to undo the things that had
been taking place since the early 1900's. JFK..... was un-doing these assaults against
Americans and was murdered before he could finish the job. The traitor LBJ quickly un-did
all the JFK had accomplished.
Sometime in the late 1950s, that world-class gossip and occasional historian, John F.
Kennedy, told me how, in 1948, Harry S. Truman had been pretty much abandoned by everyone
when he came to run for president. Then an American Zionist brought him two million
dollars in cash, in a suitcase, aboard his whistle-stop campaign train. 'That's why our
recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast.////Gore Vidal\\\\
Read this Jewish authors book online by going here:
This shows that the elder Kennedy had informed his son JFK of what he knew. I don't
believe JFK was on the Zionist's side....because like I said earlier...he was doing too
many things against Jewish interests. Scan back in this thread if you need your memory
jarred. JFK was playing along...while un-doing their evil deeds against this country.
A book written by Kerry Thornley about himself and some people that he would later believe
to be E. Howard Hunt (known CIA). The book describes some conversations that took place
for months prior to JFK's murder. The interesting points of the book are some of the
conversations between Thornley and this Hunt look alike. A couple of the interesting ones
that caught my eyes are below!!
"You will know it is happening -- when your society is becoming totalitarian -- as
soon as they start saying: 'Yesterday's gone. Don't stop thinking about tomorrow.'"
Remember this! Do you like ford Kerry? Just remember that Kerry!!
NOW IF THIS IS NOT JUST SENSATIONALISM FOR THE BOOK...IT MAKES MUCH SENSE. AFTER THE
MURDER, GERALD FORD WAS ON THE WARREN COMMISSION AND MANY THINK HE HELPED WITH THE
AND....DON'T STOP THINKING ABOUT TOMORROW WAS THE THEME SONG FOR THE CLINTON
ADMINASTRATION. CLINTON WAS THE FIRST PRESIDENT
SINCE FDR TO PLACE SO MANY JEWS IN HIS ADMINISTRATION.
THE BOOK SEEMS TO TRY AND LEAD THE READER TO A RIGHT WING NAZI CONSPIRACY AS MOST OTHERS
DO. MY QUESTION IS: WAS THORNLEY BEING TOLD THINGS SO THAT LATER HE WOULD WRITE A BOOK AND
BE CALLED TO TESTIFY THE DIS-INFORMATION HE WAS GIVEN...SO AS TO MAKE THE MURDER LOOK LIKE
A RIGHT WING NAZI CONSPIRACY! YET AT THE SAME TIME HE WAS BEING TOLD SOME THINGS THAT HE
PLACED NO RELEVENCE ON. HE DID NOT MAKE ANY IMPLICATION ABOUT THE TWO COMMENTS I POINTED
OUT AND HE SEEMED TO NOT REALIZE THEIR IMPORTANCE. JIM GARRISON HAD TIED HIM TO SOME OF
THE LEADING PLAYERS IN THE ASSASSANATION. HE WAS MERELY A WRITER WHO HAPPENED TO COME
ACROSS THESE PEOPLE. WAS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE ONE OF THE DIS-INFO STORIES TO LATER BE
REVEALED? ONE CAN ONLY PONDER. IT IS A WEIRD BOOK, BUT I SEE SOME USEFUL INFORMATION IN
IT. BELOW IS A LITTLE INFORMATION ABOUT THE WRITER!
By 1975, the Watergate revelations convinced Thornley that his most important link to the
assassination was not Oswald, but the two shadowy denizens of the French Quarter known as
Slim Brooks and Brother-in-Law, who had discussed killing Kennedy with him for a period of
over three years. Their true identities cloaked in mystery, one bore a striking
resemblance to one of the Watergate burglars, and the other answered the description of
one of Guy Banister's anti-Castro coordinators.
Finally, Thornley began to realize he had been a participant in a genocidal conspiracy
whose goals did not stop with the assassination of the President.
This document shows the intent of Kennedy to start bringing troops home!
THE WHITE HOUSE
October 11, 1963
NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDUM NO. 263
TO: Secretary of State
Secretary of Defense
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
SUBJECT: South Vietnam
At a meeting on October 5, 1963, the President considered the
recommendations contained in the report of Secretary McNamara
and General Taylor on their mission to South Vietnam.
The President approved the military recommendations contained
in Section I B (1-3) of the report, but directed that no formal
announcement be made of the implementation of plans to with-
draw 1,000 U.S. miltitary personnel by the end of 1963.
After discussion of the remaining recommendations of the report,
the President approved an instruction to Ambassador Lodge which
is set forth in State Department telegram No. 534 to Saigon.
s/ McGeorge Bundy
Director of Central Intelligence
Administrator, Agency for International Development
[Declassified - was Top Secret Eyes Only
Auth: EO 11652
By: Jeanne W. Davis
National Security Council
WHEN YOU READ THE INFORMATION FOLLOWING MY COMMENTS HERE, KEEP IN MIND THAT THE COMMUNISTS
THAT TOOK OVER RUSSIA WERE JEWISH AND THAT COMMUNISM IS A JEWISH IDEOLOGY. REMEMBER, IF
YOU'RE GOING TO FOOL SOMEONE, YOU PLANT A DIFFERENT VIEW OF YOURSELF INTO THE MINDS OF THE
PEOPLE AROUND YOU. CLAIMING TO BE ANTI COMMUNIST WOULD GRANT A PERSON ACCESS INTO A
COUNTRY THAT WAS AGAINST COMMUNISM. IS THIS PERHAPS THE WAY THE BOLSHEVIKS FURTHERED THEIR
PRESENCE IN AMERICA? LOOK AT THE NAMES OF THE PLAYERS VERY CLOSE.
REMEMBER THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INTEGRATION IS TO PLAY JUST THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT YOU ARE.
SPY'S DO THIS SAME THING.
SOME OF THESE PLAYERS PLANTED INTO THE MINDS OF PEOPLE WHO WOULD LATER WRITE BOOKS AND BE
CALLED TO TESTIFY, THAT THEY WERE FASCISTS AND NAZI'S. THIS WAS PURPOSELY DONE TO MAKE
PEOPLE BELIEVE THIS MURDER OF THE PRESIDENT WAS A RIGHT WING NAZI CONNECTED PLOT. FROM
WHAT I'VE SHOWN YOU, YOU SHOULD REALIZE IT IS A PHONY COVER TO HIDE THE TRUTH AND LEAD
INVESTIGATORS IN THE WRONG DIRECTION. REMEMBER CASTRO, HE'S STILL IN CUBA! REMEMBER
COMMUNIST RUSSIA, IT STAYED THAT WAY UNTIL 1989. REMEMBER ALL THE JEWISH CONNECTIONS AND
THE MEDIA'S UNWILLINGNESS TO PUBLISH OR KEEP THIS IN THE SPOTLIGHT. REMEMBER WHAT JIM
GARRISON SAID ABOUT THE MEDIA AND THEIR RELUCTANCE TOWARDS HIM.
WHEN DEALING WITH UNDERHANDED PEOPLE, YOU MUST REMEMBER THEIR BIGGEST WAY OF FOOLING YOU
IS THROUGH DECEPTION OF WHAT THEY REALLY ARE AND WHAT THEY REALLY STAND FOR. PLUS THEY
LIKE TO PIN THE TAIL, OR SHOULD I SAY THE TRAIL ON THE INNOCENT PARTY. FOLLOWING ARE A FEW
LINES FROM SOMETHING I FOUND INTERSETING AND TIES IN WITH ALL THE OTHER STUFF.
J. Edgar Hoover was named first Director of the FBI in 1924, and he immediately organized
the anti-communist Division Five for espionage and counter-espionage work which President
Roosevelt made official in 1936. Actually, Division Five was in existence as the General
Intelligence Division of he justice Department since 1919. Hoover, an Assistant Attorney
General and head of the GID, had used the Czarist Russians in tracing the Bolsheviks
during the Red Scare and Palmer raids of that period.(2)
1924 was the year the Communists finally took complete control of Russia after five years
of resistance by the imperial Czarists. From 1918 to 1923, the leaders of the Czarists
were leaving Russia with vast fortunes by the tens of thousands. One of those escaping
Russians was John DeMenil, presently of Houston, Texas, who fled to France, married into
the Schlumberger family, moved to Caracas, Venezuela, and then to Houston, Texas before
World War II. He is presently the Chairman of the Board of Schlumberger Corporation, a
worldwide oil well service company.
The forerunners of the Solidarists have been described by James Wechsler of the New York
Post and other writers, before and during World war II, as the Ukrainian Fascists. The
Solidarists expanded the group to include all East European exiles, including those of
various religious denominations.
Of course, these Russian exiles in all countries of the world were violently
anti-communist and considered themselves as a government in exile with headquarters in
Munich, Germany.(3) One has only to glance at Czarist Russian history to learn that these
people are the most proficient dealers in assassination the world has ever known.
George DeMohrenschildt, a Russian emigre who refused to join the Solidarists and who was
familiar with the workings of espionage groups and had worked with them in the past,
testified that J. Edgar Hoover, using Division Five of the FBI, was the planner of the
assassination of President Kennedy. Through DeMohrenschildt's testimony before the
Commission and his documentation, the connection of the espionage section of the FBI and
the Assassination has been established. (4)
The public records of the Corporate Records Department of Italy and Switzerland, Who's Who
in the South and Southwest, 1963, 1964, The Invisible Government, The Espionage
Establishment by Wise and Ross, Buddy Floyd murder files, Alice Texas, Warren Commission
26 volumes, the Grand Jury records of New Orleans Parish, New Orleans, Louisiana, all
further substantiate, bolster and corroborate the testimony of DeMohrenschildt concerning
the FBI's Division Five' s involvement.
Many examiners of the case have concluded that George DeMohrenschildt was a part of the
conspiracy because of his close association with Oswald during the fall of 1962, and
winter and early spring of 1963, but a close reading of the Russian exile's testimony
before the Warren Commission shows that DeMohrenschildt was being used by the Solidarists
the same as Oswald was being used, and was to have been tied in with Oswald in connection
with the assassination. However, DeMohrenschildt, a highly polished professional
geologist, saved himself by moving to Haiti in April of 1963 in connection with a contract
with the government of Haiti, where he still resided on the day of the assassination of
President Kennedy. (5)
DeMohrenschildt, in retrospect, knew that Division Five of the FBI and the Solidarists had
intended to use him as a scapegoat along with Oswald, and he did not hesitate to name the
small group within the Federal Bureau of Investigation as the instigators of the
assassination of President Kennedy.
Concerning the Solidarists, Jack Ruby was a second-generation immigrant from the White
Russian area of Poland and his brother, Hyman Rubenstein, was born there. Ralph Paul,
Ruby's Dallas partner in the Carousel Club, was a Russian immigrant having been born in
Kiev, Russia. (6)
While in confinement, Jack Ruby said in letters later authenticated by Hamilton
Autographs, New York City, that pogroms against the Jews in this country were a real
threat. He repeated over and over the words "pogroms against the Jews" in these
letters and in a number of habeas corpus hearings in Federal District Court in Dallas, and
at the same time, he testified that Lyndon Johnson was the head of the organization
carrying out the assassination plans. Ruby's testimony is acceptable in every court as an
accomplice witness needing only corroboration insofar as his naming Lyndon Johnson as one
of the accomplices. This has been done.
Ruby's constant use of the words "pogroms against the Jews" reveal his close
affiliation with and his deeply ingrained awareness of his family's Russian Czarist
background. Everyone even slightly conversant with Russian history knows that the words
"pogroms against the Jews" are exclusively descriptive of the Czarist Russian
Cossacks pillaging and killing of Jews in their villages and neighborhoods in Russia
during the centuries under the Czars. But to return to J. Edgar Hoover's connection with
the Czarist Russians in exile.
With the Solidarists' vast number of agents within Russia and the common anti-communist
objectives with J. Edgar Hoover, these two groups immediately merged and have continually
worked almost as one since that time. In 1960, when it was determined that Castro was a
Communist, he too was considered an occupying force, and the Cuban exiles with the common
cause worked quite naturally into the Solidarist and Division Five organizations.
Seminar in California `proving' Mossad ties to JFK killing is canceled in 1997.
The ADL's Greenspan, was the point person in opposing the seminar.
In an interview last fall, Frogue labeled the ADL "a group of spies," and said
that Kennedy assassin "Lee Harvey Oswald worked for the ADL...I believe the ADL was
The seminar, which was advertised as a sample of "high-quality community
education," Frogue invited an eclectic mix of "experts." The one who got
the most attention was Michael Collins Piper of Washington, D.C., author of "Final
Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy."
PEOPLE WHO OPPOSE OPEN DEBATE USUALLY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE.
THINK ABOUT THIS COMMENT AND THE ADL HALTING THE SEMINAR!
In an interview last fall, Frogue labeled the ADL "a group of spies," and said
that Kennedy assassin "Lee Harvey Oswald worked for the ADL...I believe the ADL was
IN LIGHT OF THE RECENT REVELATIONS ABOUT THE 140 ISRAELI SPY'S ARRESSTED IN CALIFORNIA
AFTER 9/11 TERRORIST ATTACK AND THE MEDIA PULLING THE STORY OFF OF FOX NEWS...SEEMS MR.
FROGUE WAS CORRECT IN HIS 1997 OBSERVATION. NOW ASK YOURSELF WHY OUR GOVERNMENT WOULD NOT
PUSH TO MAKE THIS KNOWN AND QUESTION THE MEDIA ITSELF FOR TRYING TO COVER ALL OF THIS UP!
THERE IS SOMETHING SINISTER GOING ON IN WASHINGTON AND IT'S NOT IN THE INTEREST OF
THERE HAS BEEN SUGGESTIONS THAT WATERGATE DURING THE NIXON YEARS HAD CONNECTIONS TO
KENNEDY'S MURDER. WHAT WAS IT THE BURGLARS WERE LOOKING FOR? DID NIXON SUSPECT WHAT I
SUSPECT AND WAS HE LOOKING FOR EVIDENCE OF A COVERUP DURING THE LBJ YEARS....OR WAS NIXON
BEING BLACKMAILED AND LOOKING FOR THE EVIDENCE AGAINST HIMSELF? THESE QUESTIONS ARE GOOD
ONES. IT'S ALSO FUNNY HOW A WASHINGTON POST (JEWISH) REPORTER BROKE THIS STORY WITH A
SUPPOSED SECRET CONTACT CALLED DEEPTHROAT...WHO MANY BELIEVE DIDN'T EXIST! WAS HE GETTING
HIS INFO STRAIGHT FROM THE OPPOSING PARTY IN THE POLITICAL ARENA. SOMETHING DOESN'T ADD UP
IN THIS WHOLE MESS OF WATERGATE AND THE PLAYERS INVOLVED!
Michael Collins Piper wrote a book linking the Israeli Mossad to the Murder of JFK.
I spoke of him earlier. He is the one the ADL had banned from making a speech at a
California seminar. Here is a short review of something from his book "Final
Judgement"! Notice how it ties in with what I've been talking about in this forum.
THE KENNEDY-NAZI CONNECTION
JFK's father, Joseph Kennedy, had a reputation of being pro-Nazi or at
least pro-Hitler. Joe was a bootlegger and a member of the Mafia, although
he hated the Jewish Mafia (Mishpucka) boss Meyer Lansky (real name Maier
Suchowljansky). He was U.S. Ambassador to Britain but was recalled because
of his pro-Hitler viewpoint. His code clerk was Tyler Kent, which is a
story in itself.
In the book *Final Judgment* by Michael Collins Piper, you will find a
story about DeWest Hooker. Hooker was a good friend of both Joseph Kennedy
and George Lincoln Rockwell, Commander of the American Nazi Party. Piper
tells of the arrangement made with Hooker and Rockwell to help JFK get
elected. Hooker said, "Frankly, as far as I'm concerned, it was my work
that got Johnny Kennedy in the White House." I suggest you read the book,
it is available from *Spotlight* Newspaper or Liberty Lobby. If I quote
small portions from it you probably would find it too hard to believe! I
assure you the story is true, for I know well the man who was the bodyguard
and stenographer/scribe to Commander Rockwell.
When Senator Joe McCarthy was conducting the hearings on Communists in the
government, his assistant, seated at the same desk beside him, was Robert
Kennedy. The Senator at the desk beside McCarthy was Senator John F.
Kennedy. JFK was an *insider* who KNEW the source of the problems. When he
became President, he fired the CIA heads, installed his brother as Attorney
General, and said he was going to put the United States back on the silver
standard, stop the Vietnam War, eliminate government involvement with the
Mafia, and eliminate the Federal Reserve problem. It has also been reported
that he was going to tell the truth about UFOs. Ten days after he gave a
speech at Columbia University making these statements, he was murdered.
This book is no longer in print and not available at the Jewish owned major bookstores.
Sounds like he and I came to some of the same conclusions as I have.
In 1963, JFK was embroiled in a bitter (then secret) conflict with Israeli leader David
Ben-Gurion over Israel's drive to build the atomic bomb; that Ben-Gurion resigned in
disgust, having told JFK that because of JFK's policies, Israel's "existence [was] in
danger." Upon JFK's assassination, U.S. policy toward Israel began an immediate
This is all documented by Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh in "The Samson
Option," by Andrew Cockburn in "Dangerous Liaison," and by Stephen Green in
"Taking Sides" - each a respected historian. Where, then, is the "Israeli
connection" to the assassination? The fact is that when New Orleans DA Jim Garrison
prosecuted Clay Shaw with conspiracy in the JFK assassination, Garrison stumbled upon the
Although Shaw was exposed as a CIA asset, Shaw was involved in 1963 in covert activities
with high-level Mossad officer Tibor Rosenbaum, whose Swiss bank laundered mob money for
Meyer Lansky, "chairman" of the crime syndicate.
Some say "the Mafia killed JFK." In fact, the Mafia bosses accused of
"whacking" JFK - Carlos Marcello and Santo Trafficante - were not only Lansky
subordinates but also CIA collaborators in plots against Fidel Castro.
And while many accuse the CIA's James Angleton of a role in the assassination cover-up,
none mention that Angleton, the CIA's Mossad liaison, was a devoted partisan of Israel.
In light of the hysteria over "Final Judgment," recall JFK's words: "A
nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is
a nation that is afraid of its people."
Final Judgement by Michael Collins Piper has been ignored or viciously attacked by
American Jewish organizations and media. No shock there since Piper makes a pretty cogent
case for the Mossad being the moving force behind the assassination of JFK. I will attempt
to redress this imbalance and offer a review of the book as a Zionist committed to the
strength and survival of Israel.
To summarize early, Piper gets lots right and lots wrong. What is bothersome is it doesn't
take much of what he gets right to make a case for Israeli involvement in the murder.
Piper's central point, and it is a major revelation, is that Clay Shaw, Oswald's handler
was on the board of a Geneva-based trade promotion company called Permindex, which I
accept was a Mossad front for covert operations.
From this point Piper works backwards and connects Clay to the Mossad, the Mossad to
Lansky and organized crime, Lansky to the CIA, the CIA to heroin production in South-East
Asia, the heroin producers to the heroin processors of Marseilles, the processors to the
OAS, the rebellious French intelligence outfit determined to assassinate Degaulle for
pulling out of Algeria, the OAS to the Mossad and now we've come full circle.
Kennedy infuriated Israeli Prime Minister David Ben Gurion by demanding an end to Israel's
nuclear program. He equally infuriated organized crime by promising to end American
involvement in Viet Nam, and thus cutting off its major source of raw opium. Even though
he frightened many in the CIA with his declarations that the organization had to be
replaced, and by his refusal to bring down Castro, that was not a prime motive in the
assassination. The CIA was involved because its top gun James Angleton was an Israeli
agent. His duty was to prepare the patsy and plant "false flags" in the Cuban
exile community. In fact, even the alleged involvement of Italian mafia leaders was a
deliberate false flag as well. The real killers were OAS-employed Corsican hitmen, or at
least one was for certain, and they were recruited by the Mossad's European chief
assassin, Yitzhak Shamir.
I would dismiss the whole thing as a fantastic yarn, except four years ago I began
researching the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, and I independently discovered too many
facts in common with Piper's. The most uncanny is that I also conclude that French
intelligence provided the operational guidance behind Rabin's murder.
I don't intend to retell Final Judgement. The following points are aimed at people who
have already read Piper's book.
* I was already familiar with the Permindex story, having read Larouche literature. I'm
not happy that he adopts the findings of a pro-Aryan organization whose primary purpose in
life seems to be to destroy the British royal family. The fact that Piper is employed by
the Liberty Lobby and their outlet, Spotlight, is not really thrilling to me either. Even
less exciting are his quotes from Jewish traitors like Ostrovsky and Lilienthal. And now I
There is a superficial similarity between me and Victor Ostrovsky in that we both are
exposing the misdeeds of Israeli intelligence agencies. The difference, and it is telling,
is that he ran away to Canada to tell his tale, while I live and raise my family in
Israel. His motives are highly suspect, mine are honest: I want my friends, family, and
especially my children, to live in a better Israel for all ages.
That said, about half of Piper's sources are Jewish, and other than Gerald Posner, they
are mostly respected assassination researchers. He is not at all reluctant to cite as an
inspiration the Jewish investigator/attorney Mark Lane, and in fact Lane was not at all
reluctant to represent Spotlight in a well publicized legal action against the CIA. All in
all, Piper doesn't sound like an anti-semite and I can spot one. I believe he is a sincere
* The main difference between my research and his is I found the evidence to prove my case
for Israeli secret service involvement in the Rabin murder. I gathered hundreds of pages
of hospital, court and police records, combined them with indisputable first hand
testimony and put together an airtight case. Piper does not succeed nearly as well. His
argument, though deft IS all circumstantial. The weight of his circumstantial evidence is
impressive but it is far from conclusive.
* Piper does not have a handle on the personal dynamics of Israeli politics. For example,
he writes off Menachem Begin as a "terrorist." Wrong. He was a freedom fighter
in the truest sense of the word and probably the only honorable person to serve as
Israel's prime minister. He somehow ties him into the plot because he had ties with
gangster Mickey Cohen. Heck, everyone in Israel knows about these ties. Back in the late
40s when no one else would arm us, the gangsters used their muscle to save our fledgling
state. So what?
But Piper intimates that just by knowing Cohen, Begin was in on the plot. That is out of
the question. In 1948, Ben Gurion ordered Yitzhak Rabin to murder Begin on a ship called
the Altalena. Begin would never have cooperated with Ben Gurion on a Hannuka party, let
alone in the murder of an American president.
Ditto, Shamir. In the mid-1940s, Ben Gurion rounded up Shamir and his militia for the
British and had them sent to incarceration camps in Central Africa. Admittedly, Shamir did
work for the Mossad during Ben Gurion's regimes, but their personal ties were strained, to
say the least. While Begin would never have cooperated with Ben Gurion in a presidential
hit, it is almost as unlikely that Shamir would have. A better candidate would be Shimon
Peres, Ben Gurion's close aide and the man who started the Israeli nuclear program with
French collusion. He is suspect number one in the Rabin assassination.
* Piper mentions the well-known fact that Jack Ruby met with "Israeli
journalists" at the Dallas police station the night before he finished off Oswald.
Possibly enforcing Piper's claims, many of my correspondents have pointed out to me that
in Leah Rabin's biography, she notes that her husband Yitzhak was in Dallas on November
22, 1963. And Rabin, himself, admitted that he was in Cambodia the next year inspecting an
Israeli "experimental farm." Yes, Rabin could have been one of the
"journalists" and yes, the farm could have been growing poppies.
That Rabin was up to his ears in drug running is illustrated during his tenure as Shimon
Peres's Defence Minister from 1984-86. This was the era of Iran Contra and Israel was
involved in selling arms to Iran to free American hostages. And the money was used to buy
cocaine in Latin America, ship it to the US, use the profits to purchase arms and funnel
these to the Contras.
Like Piper, Poindexter and North tried to shift the blame for the operation to Israel. Now
being logical, Israel had its interests in the scheme; there was money and diplomatic
brownie points. But Israel had no interest in freeing American prisoners or in funding the
Contras. Iran Contra had to have been an American operation where the Israelis were called
in for operational help.
I see the Kennedy assassination in the same terms. Oswald had been trained to be a stooge
by American military intelligence from 1957, before the foundation of the Dimona Nuclear
Reactor was even laid. Indeed, Ben Gurion could have been so angered by Kennedy's
insistence on the dismemberment of Dimona that he agreed to contribute Mossad expertise to
his assassination. However, the assassination's core plot was American and its genesis
predated any possible Israeli involvement.
* By the same token, Piper implicates the Mossad in the murders of Americans who knew too
much years after JFK was gone. William Colby's demise is his prime example. This
implication dismisses the long list of political murders and murder attempts in the US
since 1963, or for that matter, since at least Lincoln's time.
There IS a culture of political murder in the US, it has been on high gear since Clinton
has assumed power, it goes back at least 150 years and Israel, the Zionists and Mossad
have nothing to do with it.
* Piper paints Israel as the murder and crime capital of the Middle East. May we remind
him that assassination was the only means of changing Middle East regimes for a thousand
years before Zionism emerged and that most of the hard drugs sold in Europe originate from
the Syrian-controlled Beka Valley and Afghanistan. Israel didn't invent the rules of
Middle Eastern politics and may well have been forced to adopt them to survive.
* Piper makes a connection between the JFK assassination and Israel's technical help in
founding the Chinese nuclear program. While the fact of Sino/Israeli nuclear coooperation
may be genuine, Piper fails totally to find its connection to Dealey Plaza. So why include
* Similarly, since 9 of 22 Warren Commission lawyers were Jews, they must have had an
interest in the coverup. Most specious is Piper's connection between Detroit
multi-millionaire Max Fischer and Michigan Congressman Gerald Ford in the coverup. As
President, Ford was a disaster for Israel, twice withholding deliveries of fighter jets
until Israel withdrew from positions in the Sinai and Golan Heights. He was no Israeli
puppet and seemed to revel in pushing then-Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin around.
If I would draw any conclusions, assuming Piper is right, it's that knowledge of Israel's
involvement in the JFK assassination is being used to force Israel to commit suicide. How
else can one explain Rabin's decision in 1993 to accede to American (ie CFR) demands and
hand over the very heart of his nation to a ragtag band of terrorists and arm them to the
teeth to boot? Perhap's Rabin's strange appearance in Dallas was the tool used against the
Jewish people in the unstoppable American quest to make Israel defenceless.
* And one cannot ignore the strange demise of JFK Jr. Four witnesses saw the explosion
that downed his plane. One was a reporter for the Martha's Vineyard Times. He radioed the
airport tower that he was readying to land and then his plane fell 8000 feet in a few
seconds. Yes, I'm sure he was murdered. And yes, the disastrous Israeli political
establishment had one heck of a motive for involvement. The latest Kennedy to die
violently was the only American editor to expose the true conspiracy behind Rabin's
assassination. He did it in grand style in a 13 page article in the March 19997 issue of
his magazine George. And he had every intention of continuing his exposes until he got to
the bottom of the matter. We don't know what drove him to stand alone in seeking the Rabin
truth, but it may have had much to do with the information contained within Final
Let me conclude by observing that the Israeli public knew nothing whatsoever about how
Rabin was really murdered until I took the trouble of explaining the truth to them. Today
the polls show that 65% of my fellow Israelis want the Rabin assassination reinvestigated.
We are waking up to the ugly reality of the kind of leadership we are saddled with.
But I take the opposite view of Piper: my research says America corrupted Israel and not
the other way around. And, probably unlike Piper, I am seeking the truth so that one
morning the rotten murderers Americans and Israelis call their political leaders, will not
make my country hopelessly unable to defend itself against even rottener forces.
Michael Collins Piper's Response To My Critical Summary
Posted to alt.conspiracy.jfk on 2 September 2001
To Whom It May Concern:
The Good Doctor Rahn has published a "critical summary" of the SECOND EDITION of
my book FINAL JUDGMENT: THE MISSING LINK IN THE JFK ASSASSINATION CONSPIRACY on his
website. He has also posted it on this newsgroup. This is my formal response.
I have a few remarks, by way of a preface to my response to Rahn, however.
I regret that, unlike Rahn, I don't have all sorts of fancy academic titles after my name
(although I did get an undergraduate degree), but I do have to say, if anyone cares, that
a number of well-known academics have praised my writing and research skills in other
areas outside the "controversial" topics of 1) the JFK assassination and 2) U.S.
policy toward Israel and the Arab world.
However, I suppose, that when one dares to mix the two topics, it sets a writer up for
some real name-calling and heavy-duty thrashing, which is precisely what I have
experienced (even from people who SAY that they are interested in "the whole
story" of the JFK assassination).
I have discovered that, in some respects, you are "allowed" to place the blame
on any and all possible suspects with the notable exception of Israeli intelligence which
did indeed have a very good reason to want JFK out of the White House and replaced with an
"Israel-friendly" president such as LBJ (a topic explored in full detail in my
book, based upon the writings of the following:
1) Seymour Hersh: The Samson Option
2) Andrew and Leslie Cockburn: Dangerous Liaison
3) Avner Cohen: Israel and the Bomb
4) Stephen Green: Taking Sides
In any case, as anyone who has actually bothered to read my book from beginning to end
(and that evidently doesn't include Dr. Rahn, by his own admission) knows full well, I do
not place absolute singular blame on the Mossad per se.
It is important to note that Rahn's review of FINAL JUDGMENT was apparently based on the
second edition, printed in 1994. The second edition was 335 pages in length and had 677
footnotes. The fifth edition of the book, released in 2000, is a grand total of 760 pages,
featuring 1114 footnotes, along with 36 pages of pictures and illustrations.
(One of the illustrations photographically reproduces hand-written attacks on JFK by
"Si" Kenan, one of the founders of the America-Israel Public Affairs
Committee--AIPAC--the lobby for Israel. These personal documents of Kenan, which are in
safe storage, were literally slipped through my office mail-slot just before the fifth
edition went to press.
Accompanying the anti-JFK ravings were other personal documents of Kenan (dating back to
1976) which verify that the handwriting and the documents were his--or otherwise they are
very masterful forgeries of a wide-ranging number of documents, even including personal
financial records of Mr. Kenan. I have to believe that the documents must have been
grabbed by some intelligence agency, possibly the CIA or even Mossad or God knows who, and
that after someone heard about my book they decided to provide them to me.
The very existence of these documents PROVES that the israeli lobby was hostile to JFK,
contrary to the general perception--even among some JFK assassination researchers--that
JFK was a "fan" of Israel of some sort.
In any event, Mr. Rahn has obviously not seen the substantially larger and enhanced FIFTH
edition of FINAL JUDGMENT, which brings to a total some 30,000 copies of all editions of
the book now in circulation. I am going to send him a complimentary copy of the FIFTH
edition in hopes that he will read it from beginning to end, rather than dismiss it with a
sarcastic comment about my mother as he does in his "critical summary" below.
Now, let's look at this "critical summary" of FINAL JUDGMENT.
Mr. Rahn writes:
"Final Judgment: The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Controversy"
Michael Collins Piper (1993) The Wolfe Press, Washington, 335 pp.
There are four basic things about this strange book
PIPER RESPONDS: The use of the word "strange" is an obvious attempt to bias the
reader of the summary in the first place. However, Webster's Third New International
Dictionary says that strange can mean "new, unfamiliar" "not before known,
heard or seen." In that regard Rahn is correct, because FINAL JUDGMENT is the first
book ever to explore, in depth--in perhaps excrucating detail, more than anyone really
wants to know--the theory that Israel's intelligence agency, the Mossad, played a hand
alongside the CIA and the Meyer Lansky Crime Syndicate (which includes the subset known as
"the Mafia") in the assassination of President Kennedy.
that every student of the JFK assassination should know. First, it proposes that Israel's
intelligence agency the Mossad was the driving force behind the assassination.
PIPER RESPONDS: Yet, Rahn does not point out that the book explores the Mossad and Israeli
lobby connections of many of the key, commonly "recognized" players in many of
the diverse JFK assassination theories. That is what I call "the tie that binds"
in the assassination conspiracy: the fact that so many people, in the CIA, the "right
wing," the military-industrial complex, the FBI, and organized crime (often
incorrectly called "the Mafia") had intimate and significant ties to the Mossad.
Second, the conspiracy and subsequent cover-up were so large as to contain something for
PIPER RESPONDS: If Rahn had read my book--any edition of it--he would have noted in the
"Conclusion" that I say precisely the opposite: that the actual numbers of
participants in the planning (and execution) of the assassination were very small in
number: perhaps no more than 20 people in the actual planning itself. Those whom I
implicate were all closely connected at the highest levels of the CIA, the Mossad and
organized crime. And the more I look at things, the less I think it is likely that
commonly-accused "conspirators" such as Giancana, Marcello, and Traficante were
actually directly involved in any planning whatsoever. As far as the cover-up is
concerned, my book documents the little-known (but very real) connections to Israel and to
Permindex (that spooky permindex) and to the Mossad of several key figures on the Warren
Commission and in the major media. To say that "the conspiracy and subsequent
cover-up were so large as to contain something for everybody" is quite simply a total
misrepresentation of my book and its thesis.
Third, Michael Collins Piper offers not a shred of solid (physical) evidence for any of
PIPER RESPONDS: I have been the first to admit, from the beginning, and in the book, that
there is no forensic evidence to PROVE that the Mossad had a hand in the assassination.
However, there are those who will argue that there is no forensic evidence to PROVE that
Lee Harvey Oswald was indeed THE assassin or ONE OF the assassins. What
"evidence" that does exist pinning Oswald has been dissected at length from the
beginning and most people find it lacking.
And fourth, the book convinced Piper's mother.
PIPER RESPONDS: How cute of Rahn to bring my mother into this. I'm sure he uses that line
with his students. It's probably good for a laugh, but it's dirty pool at the least. She
was mentioned in passing in the acknowledgments to the book and as I have pointed out in
response to Rahn in another posting, and as I have mentioned elsewhere, I think the fact
that my mother--who is indeed my worst critic--read my book and found it convincing is
Why is my mother's opinion significant?
My mother is a reasonably intelligent woman, pretty well read in a lot of areas--probably
much better read than most Americans--and she has read many of the other books on the JFK
assassination. When I first described my thesis to her in about six or eight sentences,
she said, "I don't know about that."
Then she read the book and commented, "It makes as much sense to me as anything else
I have read on the subject." And that is precisely the average comment of the average
person who has read the book (and who has read other books on the subject).
Point three, the total lack of solid evidence, is a consequence of the coexistence of
upwards of one hundred conspiracy theories, many of them mutually exclusive, which means
that the evidence for none of them can be solid. That in turn follows from the complete
absence of strong evidence for conspiracy in general in this assassination-had such
evidence existed, it would have been shouted from the rooftops many years ago, and someone
would have long since won a Nobel prize for it, to say nothing of reaping millions from
the book and the blockbuster movie. The lack of such an occurrence should make us view
each new conspiracy offering with extreme skepticism. More strongly, the total lack of
hard evidence for conspiracy requires us to approach all proposals about conspiracy with
the time-tested working hypothesis that they will not contain any hard evidence.
PIPER RESPONDS: This is a mouthful from Rahn. But it's all about "theories" in
general and does not address ANYTHING in FINAL JUDGMENT at all. In addition, Rahn's
suggestion that someone would have "shouted" from the rooftops, etc etc is
highly unlikely. Anyone who really did have inside knowledge about the conspiracy was
either smart enough to keep his mouth shut or was silenced.
One reader of FINAL JUDGMENT described my theory to Walter Cronkite at a personal meeting
with the famed broadcaster who said, "I can't think of any group--with the exception
of Israeli intelligence--that would have been able to keep the JFK assassination
conspiracy under wraps for so long."
It should be noted that E. Howard Hunt privately offered a certain journalist based in
Canada the "whole story" of what he knew about the JFK assassination in return
for $14 million. The journalist asked Hunt why $14 million. He said: "That is what
I've calculated I would need to protect myself for the rest of my natural life," or
words to that effect. This incident involving Hunt has never been reported, but I got it
second-hand from a well-known JFK assassination investigator who got the story from the
journalist who got the offer from Hunt. The journalist in question later wrote an
entertaining piece about Hunt in a recent issue of a popular magazine that left the reader
to believe that Hunt was indeed "involved" or otherwise "connected to"
the events surrounding the JFK assassination. The journalist did not mention Hunt's offer.
It should also be noted that the journalist was working for ANOTHER publication when he
first intereviewed Hunt and received the offer. The story of Hunt's offer was not
mentioned in the final published article that appeared in another publication.
Anyway, the point is that at least one person has offered to "tell". There are
others who contend that Frank Sturgis also gave a written confession to involvement in the
assassination. In addition, Marita Lorenz says that Sturgis confessed to her. There is
also the confession of James Files. There are those who doubt these stories, but if even
ANYTHING any of them have said is true about their connections to the JFK assassination,
then--as Rahn has said--somebody HAS shouted or otherwise "whispered"--if not
from the rooftops.
As for Piper's mother, he notes that she has always been his severest critic. If Mama now
believes his book, it must be true.
PIPER RESPONDS: We've already talked about my mother. Then to call her "Mama" is
the ultimate. The next thing we know, Rahn will be wondering if "Mama" nursed me
correctly or whether she nursed me at all. Is Rahn one of these Freudian types or
something. He's starting to get absolutely Bevilaquian here! (No wonder they get along so
Michael Collins Piper proposes that the Mossad was at the center of a very large
conspiracy and cover-up.
PIPER RESPONDS: Again, I say that it was a very SMALL conspiracy and cover-up.
It starts with JFK during the first years of his presidency sufficiently angering the CIA,
the Mafia, and Israel that they all wanted to kill him. The reasons for the anger by the
CIA and the Mafia have been advanced for many years (failure to fully support the Bay of
Pigs operation, wanting to make peace with Castro, and wanting to scale down the Cold War
or end it entirely, etc.);
PIPER RESPONDS: Finally, Rahn got something right!
the reasons for Israel's anger have been overlooked until now, according to Piper,
PIPER RESPONDS: Note the phraseology: "according to Piper." A deliberate attempt
to make it appear as though all of the documentation I provide regarding JFK's bitter
relationship with David Ben-Gurion AND Ben-Gurion's successor are all just "according
to Piper." No, in fact, it is according to the following sources, which I will repeat
for the record:
1) Seymour Hersh: The Samson Option
2) Andrew and Leslie Cockburn: Dangerous Liaison
3) Avner Cohen: Israel and the Bomb
4) Stephen Green: Taking Sides
These books did not come out until the late 1980s and into the 1990s, so up until that
time there was very little published information about JFK's relationship with Israel. So,
yes, according to Piper, --and it's true-- there was very little information about JFK's
relationship with Israel and therefore no one who was looking into the JFK assassination
had any reason to look in the direction of Israel since many people believed the popular
claim (largely put forth by the israeli lobby, that "JFK loved Israel and the Jewish
people." etc etc. Sure, that's why he was determined to stop Israel from building the
nuclear bomb and that's why top jewish leaders threatened to cut off his re-election money
in 1964 if he didn't back off.
and center around Kennedy's desire to create a balanced Middle East policy and to thwart
Israel's nuclear ambitions. Israel feared that these changes would threaten the survival
of their nation.
PIPER RESPONDS: The sources cited above verify all of the things that Rahn summarizes
about my foundation for the claim that the Mossad would have had an interest in removing
JFK from office.
So they decided to kill him.
PIPER RESPONDS: Yes, I do believe that the Mossad did play a hand alongside the CIA and
the Lansky Crime Syndicate. I believe that the Permindex grouping (well known to JFK
researchers) was a part of the conspiracy and that you will find Mossad
connections--intimate connections--at all relevant levels. Frank Sturgis did work for the
Mossad as early as the late 1940s and well into the 1960s. Fact fact fact fact fact.
Israel turned to the Mafia to help, through kingpin Meyer Lansky and what Piper calls the
"Meyer Lansky Organized Crime Syndicate."
PIPER RESPONDS: As time goes by, I find less and less reason to believe that "the
Mafia" was a major player really and that is made clear in subsequent editions of the
book. Meyer Lansky, however, was part of the permindex crowd through his relationship with
the Banque de Credit Internationale of Geneva, run by Rabbi Tibor Rosenbaum, a major
Along the way, they also involved West Coast mobster Mickey Cohen,
PIPER RESPONDS: Although Mickey Cohen is mentioned in the book in regard to intrigue
against JFK, the book does not specifically say that Cohen was involved in the
assassination conspiracy. If you had read the book, Dr. Rahn, you would have seen that.
PIPER RESPONDS: Oh yes, Jack Ruby. You've heard of him. And yes, according to FBI
documents, Ruby had connections to Israel through gun-running back to the 1950s. In
addition, Ruby had a connection to israel through his friend and attorney Luis Kutner, who
was a major intelligence figure with ties to the Mossad. And--get this--Ruby met with
Lawrence Myers the night before the assassination. Myers was often called a
"Mafia" figure but he was also linked to a company implicated in illegal arms
smuggling to israel. None of this "PROVES" ANYTHING, but it does bring forth
Israeli connections to Jack Ruby that are passed by in all of the literature regarding the
JFK assassination--with the exception of FINAL JUDGMENT, which does indeed make the book
"singular, unique, peculiar." (as in "strange" as in Webster's Third)
PIPER RESPONDS: Rahn is quite reckless here. I simply pointed out that Belli acted as a
defender of the Warren Commission. Anyone who read what Rahn has written would think that
I implicated Belli in the assassination conspiracy.
PIPER RESPONDS: Permindex is what ties the CIA, the Mossad and the Lansky Crime Syndicate
together--along with elements of French intelligence.
James Jesus Angleton of the CIA,
PIPER RESPONDS: Oh yes. There's a monument in Israel to Angleton. You can't understand the
CIA and its history without considering Angleton. And you can't consider Angleton without
recognizing his role as the devoted CIA liaison to the Mossad. Most JFK researchers who
have talked about Angleton's links to the JFK conspiracy and cover-up (if they have done
so at all) are hesitant to mention the Mossad connection.
E. Howard Hunt,
PIPER RESPONDS: You can't talk about the JFK assassination without talking about E. Howard
Hunt, if only because he has been involved in two lawsuits on the subject and has been
written about extensively. In FINAL JUDGMENT I try to make sense of what has been written
and been said about Hunt and put it in a context that explains what did--or didn't--happen
on November 22, 1963. And if Dr. Rahn had read my book carefully he would see that I don't
necessarily contend that Hunt was INVOLVED in the assassination per se, but only that he
was involved in activities that circled around the assassination itself.
French Corsican gangsters,
PIPER RESPONDS: Maybe. Maybe not. But I did have a French source, former French
intelligence operative Pierre Neuville, clearly identified, with his whole story told, in
the FIFTH edition of FINAL JUDGMENT, also including French intelligence documents relating
to Neuville, who was supposed to be a patsy in a Mossad plot to kill Nasser of Egypt.
to name a few.
PIPER RESPONDS: This, again, is disingenuous. I state very clearly in the summary of the
book that only a small handful of people were actually involved in the assassination
planning and execution.
They piggy-backed their efforts on a fake-assassination scheme described by Gary Wean in
"There's a FISH In The COURTHOUSE." Hunt had developed the idea of pretending to
try to assassinate the president but failing. It would leave a false trail that would lead
directly to Fidel Castro and rouse American sympathies for an invasion of Cuba that would
depose Castro once and for all. Hunt sold the plan to other high-ranking anti-Castro
people in the Kennedy administration, up to and including his Cabinet. JFK was kept
unaware of it for his own "protection". (I'm not making this up, folks.)
PIPER RESPONDS: This is indeed, roughly, what Gary Wean contends in his book. The truth
is, however, that the thesis of FINAL JUDGMENT does not stand or fall on what Gary Wean
has written. Even if Gary Wean had NEVER written his book, everything else in FINAL
JUDGMENT stands on its own. So Rahn is way off the beam by trying to suggest that my whole
thesis rests on Wean's claims about this "dummy assassination attempt."
And by the way, although Rahn calls Gary Wean my "favorite informant," Gary Wean
(to my surprise) has actually attacked FINAL JUDGMENT. Despite that, Rahn doesn't seem to
be aware that Wean has now identified the name of the person who told the story about a
"dummy assassination" that was manipulated from and that person is former Sen.
John Tower of Texas. Wean disguised his identity in his book THERE'S A FISH IN THE
COURTHOUSE by saying "John" was a big man, when, in fact, as everyone knows,
John Tower was a little man. Now that Tower is dead, Wean felt that he could identify him
and has done so.
The Mossad had a spy in their midst, however, and seized the opportunity to sneak in their
own shooters and do the job for real. Naturally, Hunt and the others were devastated when
Kennedy was actually killed. They considered it a giant double-cross by somebody;
PIPER RESPONDS: I don't believe that Wean himself believes it was the Mossad, but that's
really neither here nor there.
only now does Piper reveal that it was the Mossad from the outside rather than a
double-cross from the inside.
PIPER RESPONDS: Oh, isn't Rahn clever: "Only now does Piper reveal" Piper isn't
"revealing" anything. Piper is stating his thesis based on a wide-range of
information. This kind of sarcasm is typical of those who can only cast aspersions on
"conspiracy theories" by using sarcastic tones such as this.
Anyway, I'm not sure that if there was a Mossad double-cross that it was "from the
outside" rather than from the inside, since the Mossad was very much
"inside" the CIA through the good offices of James Jesus Angleton.
Piper stresses how other writers have glimpsed part of this murky scenario, but have not
been able to put it all together. Dick Russell, in "The Man Who Knew Too Much,"
sensed that some other group usurped Oswald's "relationship with the CIA." Gerry
Patrick Hemming was said by Russell to have noticed a third force of anti-Castro exiles
that seemed to be controlled by an agency other than the CIA. Donald Freed and Mark Lane's
"Executive Action" proposed that Oswald had gotten involved in some outside
action, as did Robert Morrow's "Betrayal." Don DeLillo's "Libra"
contained a fake assassination attempt that went awry. None other than Chauncey Holt
related his involvement in a faked assassination attempt that was to be blamed on Castro.
Michael Milan's "The Squad" says that the guns were aimed at Connally rather
than Kennedy, and that LBJ and Hoover were ultimately responsible. James Reston, Jr.,
wrote similarly that Connally had been the target. Lastly, former Mossad agent Victor
Ostrovsky wrote in "By Way Of Deception" that the Mossad taught its recruits
that Connally had been the true target.
PIPER RESPONDS: Yes, these other individuals have made such statements, although without
responding in detail to each, it seems to me that Rahn is trying to suggest that all of
these things are somehow "contradictory." Quite the contrary. Instead, they all
point to the idea that perhaps there were other elements at work, manipulating different
people in different ways, bringing them together in Dallas on November 22, 1963.
After all this, one would expect some pretty strong evidence from Piper. It is absent.
PIPER RESPONDS: It is rather interesting to me that Rahn has focused on what is the one
chapter in the book where I actually try to make sense of anything that did -- or did not
-- actually happen in Dallas. I have never suggested that this chapter is
"proof" of anything, but it does show the manipulation surrounding the E. Howard
Hunt story (and the Angleton connection thereto) and demonstrates how the oft-discussed
"French connection" may well indeed be the very real "Israeli
connection" to the assassination.
Rahn does not address any of the Mossad connections of Clay Shaw, Guy Banister, Frank
Sturgis, James Angleton, Louis Bloomfield nor, most pointedly, does he want to seem to
address the very real MOTIVE for the Mossad and supporters of Israel in the CIA to want to
get JFK out of the way.
Although I didn't comb every single page of the book,
PIPER RESPONDS: Not very academic of Dr. Rahn.
I was unable to find a single piece of solid evidence to support any single aspect of
Piper's multi-tentacled "explanation." It's all connections, all loose and
PIPER RESPONDS: The connections are not "loose" and "indirect." E.G.
Would Rahn say that the fact that Louis Bloomfield, a henchman of the Bronfman family and
a top Israeli lobby figure, was chairman of Permindex and that Clay Shaw--out of all of
the trade executives in the world--was on the board of Permindex was "loose" and
"indirect." Or that Permindex ties back to the Mossad and to the Lansky
Syndicate as well. That old saw that "it's all connections" doesn't wash.
"Connections" are what life is all about. It's Rahn's "connections"
that have made him the esteemed academic that he is today.
Unfortunately for conspiracists, connections do not a conspiracy or an assassination make.
PIPER RESPONDS: An assassination couldn't happen if people planning the assassination
didn't have the "connections" to make it happen.
Piper's entire book is wishful thinking.
PIPER RESPONDS: That's what you say. Those who have read the book say that it does make
sense; that the conspiracy presented is no more outlandish or no more illogical than other
conspiracy theories regarding the subject; further, that my book is the one that ties ALL
of the seemingly disparate conspiracies together in a WAY THAT MAKES SENSE.
The astute reader will have sensed from the beginning that this is coming, however, for
the first chapter glosses over any need for conclusive evidence by stating, "The
purpose of 'Final Judgment,' you see, is not to prove, once and for all, that there was
indeed a conspiracy to assassinate President John F. Kennedy and to perpetuate a cover-up
of that conspiracy. That has been proven, time and again, in an endless array of books,
monographs, magazine articles-even in the pages of several novels." That chapter then
goes on to assert that "Final Judgment" builds on the foundation of several
"generally accepted" conclusions about the assassination, which include that it
was a conspiracy, that it involved the CIA, the Mafia, anti-Castro Cubans, Lee Harvey
Oswald (himself involved with U.S. Intelligence), and Jack Ruby (as part of the Mafia),
that Oswald was killed to silence him, and that the CIA, the Warren Commission, and the
House Select Committee on Assassinations were all directly and knowingly involved in
covering it up.
PIPER RESPONDS: Thank you, Dr. Rahn, for making the point that I made RIGHT UP FRONT in
the book: the fact that I didn't feel the need to rehash all of the forensic and other
evidence that numerous other researchers, beginning with Mark Lane, Josiah Thompson and
many, many, many others have successfully brought out over the years. My purpose was not
to determine HOW the crime was committed in Dealey Plaza, but, having been
"convinced" by other researchers that it was more than "one lone nut,"
I wanted to find out WHO WAS ULTIMATELY BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY. There's nothing more that
the real conspirators want than to have people debating ballistics and autopsy records
that may or may not be genuine and avoiding the ULTIMATE QUESTION: Who really killed
If you don't feel the need to produce any evidence that the WC (with the Chief Justice of
the U.S.), the HSCA, and the CIA deliberately covered up the crime of the century, for
reasons that included protecting the Mafia, you certainly won't feel the need to produce
any evidence for the huge conspiracy they were allegedly covering up. Come to think of it,
that may be the only logical thing in the whole book.
PIPER RESPONDS: This is very interesting. Rahn obviously believes it is impossible for the
Chief Justice of the United States or members of Congress to commit crimes or cover-up for
the crimes of others. Oh my! How dare anyone suggest that the Chief Justice of the United
States was less than perfect. I won't dare mention the frying pan murder of Earl Warren's
bootlegger/whorehouse keeping father who evidently upset his son by refusing to give up
the family business after putting the kid through law school. (Whoops! Another conspiracy
theory. I better not go any further with that one.)
Across the front cover of "Final Judgment" runs a red bar that announces it as
"The New Underground Best-Seller."
PIPER RESPONDS: Just about 30,000 copies in circulation. Pretty good.
After reading the book, I have concluded that "underground" is just the place
where it deserves to be.
PIPER RESPONDS: You're really funny. I trust that you will publish my response, word for
word, on your website. That's a fair thing to do. I would also be willing to come at my
own expense to talk to your class and let them ask me questions about my book. I'll even
send you multiple copies for your class to read. I was invited to speak before an advanced
honors class for seniors in political science at a high school in Ohio and got very good
reviews from these college-bound kids. I would be especially delighted to talk to some
college kids and hear what they have to say. Do you DARE invite the author of a
"strange" book such as me to speak to your class?
The following are excerpts from :
The Sins of the Father - by Ronald Kessler
- One of Joe Kennedy's closest friends was Morton Downey, a night-club singer who later
became a radio idol in the 1930s and 40s. As one friend put it, "Mort did him favors
in the department Joe liked best - girls, he knew chorus girls." Furthermore, since
most of the clubs where Downey sang were owned by the mob, Joe gained access to mobsters
like Frank Costello who were critical to his bootlegging business.
- Besides their love of young women, Downey and Kennedy shared a hatred of Jews. As
successful Irishmen, they needed another minority to ridicule. When Joe later went to
Hollywood, he told friends he expected to wipe out the Jewish "pants pressers"
who ruled Hollywood.
- "Joe Kennedy's feeling toward Jews was that the only way he could be a success was
that every day when he got up, he would focus on one deal involving a Jew, and he would
win the deal. That was his whole driving spirit," said Morton Downey Jr, quoting what
his father had told him about Joe.
- Shortly after he became Chancellor of Germany in 1933, Adolph Hitler began his campaign
against the Jews. Hitler used Germany's severe economic problems to win support from
extremists who had fomented violence. He claimed Germany had been "stabbed in the
back" by the acquiescence of German leaders to the Treaty of Versailles. As
scapegoats, he singled out Jews and Communists. They were responsible for Germany's
- As the Nazi party grew, Hitler destroyed the constitutional government. Squads of
brown-shirted stormtroopers carted off critics and tortured or shot them. Over four
thousand people in public life were thrown in jail.
- On April 1, 1933, persecution of the Jews in Germany became official policy, beginning
with a Nazi initiated boycott of Jewish businesses and shops. Nazi students and professors
burned hundreds of thousands of books, including many written by Jews, as part of a
"purification" of German culture.
- As ambassador to England, Joe would later make clear that he thought the Jews had
"brought on themselves" whatever Hitler did to them. During a 1938 meeting at
the German embassy in London, Kennedy assured the German ambassador that America only
wanted friendly relations with Hitler. Joe said that Hitler's government had done
"great things" for the country, and that the Germans were "satisfied"
and enjoyed "good living conditions." Joe told the ambassador that a recent
report which said the limited food in Germany was being reserved for the army could not be
true. After all, Joe said, the professor who had made the report "was a Jew."
- Kennedy urged his friend William Randolph Hearst to help Hitler improve his image in the
United states. Hearst agreed, and under his own byline he told his readers that Hitler had
"restored character and courage. Hitler gave hope and confidence. He established
order and unity of purpose."
- Based on what his father had told him, Morton Downey Jr said, "I think if Joe had
his way, Hitler would have succeeded in his annihilation of the Jews....He always found
great favor in Hitler. He would have loved to see him succeed."
- Joe Kennedy often professed admiration for the works of Brooks Adams, whose views on
racial purity paralleled Hitler's. Joe accepted Adams as his intellectual guru, ratifying,
as he did, the prejudices that Joe already had.
- An historian, Adams articulated a "survival of the fittest" theory much like
Hitler's. Eventually, he wrote, the "energy" of a "race" is exhausted,
and it must be replaced by the infusion of "barbarian blood."
- In The Theory of Social Revolutions as well as other works, Adams maintained that
American democracy had inherent defects. Without near-dictatorial powers, presidents
cannot govern effectively. Ultimately, these defects would bring disaster to the country.
Adams predicted Englend would fare even worse because the country was in a state of
"decay" brought on by "high living, wasteful habits, and intellectual
torpor." In contrast, Germany had a strong military and a vigorous population that
was better educated.
- Joe Kennedy, as a capitalist, liked Adams' theories because he saw himself as their
beneficiary and they appealed to his prejudices. According to Adams, the
"greedy" economic man or capitalist becomes dominant in society. Morality and
ethics are of no value. Instead, "Men do not differ from the other animals, but
survive, according to their aptitudes, by adapting themselves to exterior conditions which
prevail at the moment of their birth."
- Joe Kennedy's oldest son, Joe Jr, absorbed his father's virulent anti-Semitism. During a
break from school in 1934, Joe Jr traveled to Germany. By then, public eating facilities,
theaters, and shops in Germany displayed signs saying "Jews Not Welcome." Jewish
mothers could not buy milk for their infants. Jews who were sick could not obtain
- Joe Jr wrote to his father that Hitler had taken advantage of a widespread dislike of
the Jews, a dislike which was "well-founded." He told his father that Hitler was
"building a spirit in his men that could be envied in any country." The
brutality, bloodshed, and marching were necessary, he said, and the sterilization law was
a "good thing." "I don't know how the church feels about it but it will do
away with many of the disgusting specimens of men who inhabit this earth," Joe Jr
- To be sure, anti-Semitism in the United States at the time, particularly in Boston, was
not uncommon. But while many were passively anti-Semitic, Joe Kennedy was rabidly so.
Repeatedly and aggressively, he attacked the Jews, even suggesting to his son Jack that he
incorporate a campaign against the Jews as part of his political platform.
Joe Kennedy - Supporter of McCarthyism
- Like Kennedy, Joseph R McCarthy was a bully, adept at creating suspicion and circulating
rumors to smear people as Communists. Kennedy had contributed to the Wisconsin
Republican's senate campaigns, and invited him a number of times to Hyannis Port. McCarthy
attended the wedding of Joe's daughter Eunice Kennedy, and was Joe's guest at numerous
other affairs, where Kennedy introduced him as his "valued friend."
- Although McCarthy was at first an undistinguished legislator, he captured national
attention in February 1950 by arguing that the State Department was riddled with
card-carrying members of the Communist Party. Shrewd at public relations and media
manipulation, McCarthy intimidated his opponents and evaded demands for tangible proof as
he developed a large and loyal following.
- McCarthy's activities gave rise to the term "McCarthyism," referring to the
use of sensational and highly publicized personal attacks, usually based on
unsubstantiated charges, as a means of discrediting people thought to be subversive.
- In November 1950, Joe Kennedy spoke at the Harvard Graduate School of Public
Administration, where he said that not enough had been done to get Communists out of the
United States government. He professed his respect for Joe McCarthy, who was just
beginning his witch hunt for Communists, and Joe said he "knew McCarthy pretty well,
and he may have something."
- Late in 1952, Senator Joseph McCarthy became chairman of the Permanent Subcommittee on
Investigations of the Senate Government Operations Committee. Arthur Schlesinger Jr
referred to McCarthy's anti-Communist activities as his "jihad," but Joe Kennedy
admired his friend's stand. To Kennedy, Communism, not Nazism, posed the greatest threat.
He was an old hand at spreading rumors himself.
-In December 1952, Joe Kennedy called McCarthy and asked him to give his son Bobby a job
on the committee. In January 1953, McCarthy named Bobby Kennedy assistant counsel.
- Bobby appeared to be blind to McCarthy's demagoguery. "Joe McCarthy's methods may
be a little rough," he told reporters, "but, after all, his goal is to expose
Communists in government, and that's a worthy goal. So why are you reporters so critical
of his methods?"
- McCarthy's failure to substantiate his claims of Communist penetration of the army in
the nationally televised army-McCarthy hearings finally discredited him. On December 2,
1954, the Senate voted to condemn him, 67 to 22. Jack Kennedy, senator from Massachusetts,
was the only Democrat who did not vote against McCarthy. Jack's failure to condemn Joe
McCarthy would cost him the vice presidential nomination in 1956.
- The family allegiance to McCarthy was demonstrated again when Bobby Kennedy attended
McCarthy's funeral in May 1957.
Now bear in mind that the above topic of JFK's father shows a strong anti Jewish agenda on
the part of the elder Kennedy. Whether this was in a mean spirited way or because of his
knowledge as a public official cannot be proven. I think in light of the fact that Joe was
behind getting John elected, it's pretty obvious that JFK shared the same views. It is
known that both John and Robert were both very anti communist and we all know that
communism is a Jewish idea as in Russia. You should also read about Joe McCarthy. It now
appears after the opening of Soviet files that what Joe McCarthy tried to tell the public
was true. Put all of this puzzle together and it ties in more and more with a Jewish plot
to assassinate JFK. Here is one more little interesting tidbit just for fun!
Kennedy won 303 electoral votes to Nixon's 219. But Republicans charged that that there
was voter fraud in Texas and Cook County, Ill., where the political machine was controlled
by Mayor Richard Daley - father of Gore's campaign manager, Bill Daley.
Was LBJ the insiders man that they managed to get on the ticket through clever
manipulation of the Kennedy campaign?
Make sure you read between the lines of all of this. Here we see Bobby in an early role
and later he would work for his brother doing some of the same kind of work. Both John and
Robert worked hard against communism. I believe the communists infiltrated this country
posing as exiles from Russia and that some were already here like the Bankers that funded
the Jewish communist takeover of Russia. They were working together and had men in our
government who were traitors or just plain ole stupid working with them. I believe JFK was
working against their wishes and that of Israel as I've already shown...so they had him
murdered. Robert would follow 6 years later.
In December 1952, Joe Kennedy called McCarthy and asked him to give his son Bobby a job on
the committee. In January 1953, McCarthy named Bobby Kennedy assistant counsel.
- Bobby appeared to be blind to McCarthy's demagoguery. "Joe McCarthy's methods may
be a little rough," he told reporters, "but, after all, his goal is to expose
Communists in government, and that's a worthy goal. So why are you reporters so critical
of his methods?"
President Kennedy was the only American president who made serious efforts to curb the
Israeli nuclear project. Based on a volume of newly declassified documents as well as
interviews, Israel and the Bomb reconstructs the details of Kennedy's efforts. Cohen
suggests that Ben Gurion's resignation in 1963 may have been triggered, in part, by
James J. Angleton of the CIA memo advising CIA Director McCone and FBI Director Hoover on
their answers before questioning by the Warren Commission.
May 13, 1964
To: Mr. A.H. Belmont
From: Mr. W.C. Sullivan
Subject: JAMES ANGLETON
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA)
James Angleton just called me to advise that Mr. McCone, Director of CIA, will testify
before the Commission tomorrow. Angleton said it occurred to him that it would be well for
both McCone and Mr. Hoover to be aware that the Commission might ask the same questions
wondering whether they would get different replies from the heads of the two agencies.
Angleton wanted us to know some of the things which he believes McCone will be asked and
the replies which will be given.
One question will be "Was Lee Harvey Oswald ever an agent of CIA?" The answer
will be no. A second question will be "Does CIA have any evidence showing that a
conspiracy existed to assassinate President Kennedy?" The answer to this question
will also be no. The third question will be "What suggestions does CIA have to offer
for safe-guarding the life of the President of the United States?" Angleton didn't
have the complete answer to this worked out but because of the nature of the question, it
wouldn't conflict with what the Bureau has already suggested. A fourth question will be
"Does CIA believe the Soviet documents on Oswald submitted to the Warren Commmission
accurately reflect the Soviet relations with Oswald?" Angleton said their answer
cannot be either a flat yes or no because they do not have the knowledge to so state. He
said he believes McCone's answer will be to the effect that CIA is aware that Soviet
Russia does have a directorate charged with the responsibility for carrying out
assassinations and, therefore, these documents in question would not normally reflect
accurately relations with such a person as Oswald. However, on the other hand, CIA has no
evidence that Oswald was under the instructions of this directorate charged with
Angleton said if anything further developed today which would be helpful to us, he would
Before examining Angleton's relationship with Oswald, it would be useful to understand
Angleton's relationship with the CIA. Angleton ran the Counterintelligence unit. The
primary role of Counterintelligence is to protect agents from a foreign intelligence
organization from uncovering CIA assets and operations. Another important role is the
ability to disseminate disinformation to foreign intelligence services in an effort to
create for them a false picture of reality, causing them to act in ways that may be
ultimately against their own interests. In other words, Counterintelligence was a unit
that conducted operations, not just research. For that reason, the CI staff resided inside
the Directorate of Plans (DDP) and not on the analytical side of the agency.
In addition to owning counterintelligence, Angleton also had control over the FBI's
relationship with the Agency (he owned the liaison relationship between FBI and CIA), and
sole control of the Israeli desk, which included liaison with their intelligence service,
Much more here: http://www.webcom.com/ctka/pr700-ang.html
After reading more of Mr. Freedmans material...it appears that President Kennedy may have
double crossed the zionists. President Kennedy was at first acting like he was supportive
of Israel..prior to becoming President, but after he became President he did not live up
to the Zionists expectations and instead went against their wishes concerning Israel.
Personally, I don't think Kennedy ever had any intent to coddle the Jewish
interests...(remember, his father was on to the Jewish agenda and worked to get his son
elected)...he only went along to get elected. This only strengthens the motive of why the
Zionists ordered his death warrent. The Zionists had been suckered...much like they sucker
others. Kennedy was an intelligent and brave man....unlike so many of the traitors in
Kennedy's stance against Israel's nuclear program!
JFK's Letter to Eshkol About Dimona
Dear Mr. Prime Minister [Eshkol]:
It gives me great personal pleasure to extend congratulations as you assume your
responsibilities as Prime Minister of Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in
your new tasks. It is on one of these that I am writing you at this time.
You are aware, I am sure, of the exchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion
concerning American visits to Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently, the
Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intense personal
consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for your Government, as it is not for
mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister's strong reaffirmation that Dimona will be
devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel's
willingness to permit periodic visits to Dimona.
I regret having to add to your burdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel
the crucial importance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this early
date certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion's May 27 letter, as to
the nature and scheduling of such visits.
I am sure you will agree that these visits should be as nearly as possible in accord with
international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the
Dimona project. As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government's commitment to and support of
Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to
obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as the question of Israel's
effort in the nuclear field.
Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you
had proposed. If Israel's purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that
the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this
summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure
that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which Mr.
Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be essential, and I understand that Mr.
Ben-Gurion's letter was in accord with this, that our scientist have access to all areas
of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication
facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time to be allotted for a
Knowing that you fully appreciate the truly vital significance of this matter to the
future well-being of Israel, to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our
carefully considered request will have your most sympathetic attention.
John F. Kennedy
(July 5, 1963)
(Israel State Archive, Jerusalem. For more information, reference Israel and the Bomb, by
Avner Cohen, pages 153-162)
Ruby"s ties to the Russian (Jewish) mafia in Flordia.
This is a true story that Officer "Fritz" of the Dallas Police department
declined interest in and where Jim Garrison was headed. The Cuba thing to me, is of no use
to this case, rather the focus should be on the ties of the players with other players.
This just helps show the ties Ruby had with the Mob and that Oswald knew Ruby.
The team of assassins may have been brought in from Florida where the Russian (Jewish)
mafia is known to have a strong base due to their drug smuggling operations.
What puzzles me though is why Fritz wasn't interested in information that linked Ruby to
Oswald. This alone proves conspiracy, if you don't believe anything else.
The Warren commission was nothing but a cover-up from the beginning.
Deputy Constable Seymore Weitzman found the rifle in the School Book Depository between
some boxes. He stated it was a German Mauser and 7.6 caliber. Looking on the rifle, in
plain sight the tag said Italy 6.5 caliber. Was this a slip of the tounge of a pre
prepared weapon that was to be found and someone got the details wrong or was there
possibily 2 different guns found...which meant two shooters at the Depository? President
Johnson instructed the FBI to gather information on all persons who were studying the
assassination. He wanted to be sure that the official cover-up Warren story was the only
How could such a blunder have happened with the description of the rifle? Notice the last
name. If anyone knows the racial ID of Weitzman, please let me know. Sounds like another
Jew ( I may be wrong on this) who happened to find the weapon that pointed to the lone
assassin theory. That could be the reason he initially identified it as a German rifle.
PIN THE TAIL ON A NAZI!
This of course is just speculation on my part about the name...but if this individual does
turn out to be Jewish... that found the gun...It will be another strange coincidence.
Even if he's not Jewish, claiming that the gun was German made and of a certain
caliber...when the Rifle was clearly marked as Italian and of another caliber...is already
strange...especially for an officer of the law!!!
There is much more to this story, but by now if you have read what I asked you to
read...you should be seeing a clear picture. This murder was designed to further Zionist
interests and to
overthrow all white nations. It's shocking that American's continue to support Israel and
that the US government gives Israel 3 billion dollars a year of our taxpayer dollars. In
the name of worshipping the golden calf and religious brainwashing...people cannot see the
truth. I have shown you the truth and as an American you should pass this along to
everyone you know...so that America can free herself of this evil Zionist control. We all
owe it to President Kennedy and to the future of our children, not only in America...but
every other nation also. Now do your part and spread the word!
Tuesday, November 02, 2010
Copyright @ 2010 by Fathers'
Manifesto & Christian Party