"The first thing we do," said the character in Shakespeare's Henry VI, is "kill all the lawyers"
"Because the principal Effect which we can desire or expect of the Action, is the Conversion . . . of the people in those Parts unto the true Worship of God and Christian Religion."
VIRGINIA CHARTER, 1609
Copyright ï¿½ 2002 by The Fathers' Manifesto
Please distribute freely, all portions intact.
If Shakespeare was serious, then we'd have to kill of 70% of the world's supply of lawyers, because that's how many are in the US. Since we're only 4.5% of the world's population, the US is thus over-represented by lawyers by 15 times. We have 60 times as many lawyers as Japan, who has 4 times as many engineers as us, which is proof enough that we don't need this many lawyers to function, or survive, or thrive.
EACH ADDITIONAL LAWYER REDUCES GDP A QUARTER OF A MILLION DOLLARS
So what has this gorge of lawyers accomplished in the last century? Have they provided a tangible benefit that Americans can or should or must be proud of? Can we really point to our system of justice and proclaim it a raving success, as our jewish controlled media does daily? Or was Stephen P. Magee correct when he estimated several years ago that each additional lawyer in this country reduces GDP by a quarter of a million dollars?
EACH ADDITIONAL LAWYER COSTS $12.5 MILLION
In fact, Stephen Magee was wrong. His estimate was way too low. He excludes far too many things from his estimate that are too precious to be able to assign a value to. For example, one of the most incredible accomplishments of American lawyers was to attain the undisputed world's highest incarceration rate at the very same time that they attained the world's third highest murder rate, something that an effective justice system would have a difficult time justifying. If incarceration is an effective deterrent to crime, then why should both our incarceration and murder rates have increased more than ten fold in parallel with each other during the 20th Century? If we had a high incarceration rate but a low murder rate, then the high incarceration rate would be justified. Or if we had a low incarceration rate but a high murder rate, then it could be argued that the high murder rate was the direct result of our low incarceration rate. But when both rates increased in parallel from one of the world's lowest to one of the world's highest all within one century, you have to question the efficacy of feeding this many lawyers, and you have to wonder what it is about having so many lawyers that we also have so many criminals and prison inmates. And you have to question why the number of all three (criminals, inmates, and lawyers) increased so dramatically at the same time, because this is solid evidence of a conscience effort rather than a random occurrence.
If we had had a murder rate equivalent to Spain during the 20th Century, then just in that century alone, almost one million fewer Americans would have been murdered, so we are not raising a trivial question here. The loss of life is the equivalent of 200 bombings of the World Trade Center and Pentagon. How would Stephen Magee assign a value to the lives of these one million fellow Americans who are no longer with us? If we used the same value of $100,000 for a life that civil engineers use, then this loss is a mere $100 billion. If we used the $1 million per life that our courts use, then the loss is only a trillion dollars. Our attack on Afghanistan was justified by a loss of American life which is one two hundredth of this additional loss of American lives to murderers, so we obviously place a higher value than a trillion dollars on such a loss. If getting justice for 9-11 costs American taxpayers $50 billion, then it would be expected that getting justice for these one million extra murders would be worthy of an investment 200 times that, or $10 trillion. If it was our own lawyers who are directly responsible for this travesty of justice, then Stephen Magee must include this $10 trillion in his estimate for the cost of lawyers, which works out to an additional $12.5 million per lawyer--a figure which alone is 50 times greater than his total estimate.
ONE MILLION EXTRA MURDERS ARE 200 TIMES MORE COSTLY IN LIVES THAN 9-11
Not only is this loss of life 200 times greater than the loss of life in 9-11, but most of the relatives of those murder victims were never compensated by government programs, they never received accolades from mayors and governors and presidents, and they are hardly ever mentioned in our "free press". Conversely, Congress approved a welfare handout to New Yorkers who are *heavily* insured by private insurance companies which is reported to be $1.5 million per victim of the WTC bombing. We hear endless reports about the "bravery" of people who were killed in the WTC (many of whom supported the "gun control laws" which enabled airliners to be hijacked with boxcutters in the first place), but we hear little from the same press about what's being done to reverse our high murder, divorce, incarceration, and violent crime rates.
120,000 AMERICAN MURDERERS NEVER PUNISHED
Most countries resolve and bring to justice more than 95% of their murderers, just as we did at the beginning of the 20th Century. But by the end of that century, more than a third of all murderers in the US were never brought to justice, for a total of 120,000 murderers just in the last 40 years. Three of every 100,000 Americans are murdered and their murderers are never even discovered, which is a rate twice that of the total murder rate of Spain. Per capita we have twice as many murderers who are never discovered than Spain has total murderers. Not only do we have a 15x over-abundance of lawyers, the world's highest incarceration rate, the world's third largest murder rate, but we have more murderers running around free than most countries have murderers in total. Is this the definition of justice that our Founding Forefathers had in mind? Not quite.
OUR CRIME RATES ARE TEN TO EIGHTY TIMES HIGHER THAN MUSLIM COUNTRIES
This is just the tip of the iceberg, though. Many of the Muslim countries that we're intent on bombing into oblivion so that we can "improve" their lives by imposing our "solutions" upon them also have lower crime rates than us. The UN data for Turkey which is available on the internet shows that if we had had a crime rate equivalent to Turkey's, then just last year we would have had:
ANNUAL ECONOMIC LOSS TO CRIME VICTIMS IS $6.2 BILLION
Just because the Bureau of Justice Statistics estimates that the economic loss to crime victims is low doesn't mean that it's a small problem. The average loss to an assault victim of $124 means that our additional loss to assault is only $67 million each year, but if you had been one of those victims, you most likely would have placed a higher value on your loss than that. Its estimate of $234 for each rape victim means that our additional economic loss to rape crimes is only $27 million per year, but if you had been a rape victim, you might believe that the actual loss is twice or three or ten times higher than that. Nonetheless, 65% of the $17.6 billion in annual direct costs of crime to crime victims is reimbursed through insurance claims, so the net economic loss to crime victims is $6.2 billion per year.
ANNUAL ECONOMIC LOSS TO FIGHTING CRIME COSTS $400 BILLION
This doesn't include, however, the extra $400 billion per year that it costs to sustain the world's record high incarceration rate, wherein American men are one out of every three men around the world who are behind bars. It excludes the cost of "fighting crime", which is 64 times more expensive than the net loss to crime victims, which means that the real victims of crime are the taxpayers who have to fund the process rather than the victims of crime. For every dollar that a crime victim loses to crime, the taxpayer loses another $64. Where the annual net loss to crime should have been only $6.2 billion, it's now $406.2 billion. And just like with our rate of murder, the faster our rate of incarceration grew, the faster all of these other crime rates grew: further evidence of a conscience effort to use our justice system to thwart Christian principles. The Holy Bible calls for a criminal to reimburse his victim by an amount equivalent to 3-7 times the value of his victim's loss, not for innocent third parties to be charged 64 dollars for every one dollar of loss to a crime victim. A "cure" which is 64 times more costly than the original "disease" is nothing less than a prescription for economic and social disaster.
THE ABA SET OUT TO INTENTIONALLY DESTROY THIS CHRISTIAN NATION
How can such a system just evolve by chance? It can't. It required many people working closely together to create such an out of control bureaucracy, one that continues to grow dynamically at the same time that the problem that it is tasked to "solve" continues to spiral out of control. This cannot happen by chance, because far too many public servants could have seen what was happening and stopped or reversed the process if it had been just by chance. It was carefully masterminded by the American Bar Association to use our own justice system to destroy this Christian nation, and each and every member of our legal establishment knows it. The simple fact that they don't discuss this publicly doesn't conceal their personal role in this massive injustice, nor absolve them of their guilt.
Turkey's incarceration rate is relatively high, but it's still a quarter of ours, yet Turkey still manages to keep such crimes under control with this much lower prison population: proof enough by itself that our justice system doesn't dispense justice. Each one of these differences in crime rates is yet another example of how our crime rates *increased* as a direct result of our increased incarceration rate; something that's possible only with a concerted action plan, namely the Talmud.
HALF OUR JUDGES AND LAWYERS ARE JEWS
Whether or not you agree that jews should judge Christians, or that it's "anti-Semitic" to make this observation, the simple fact is that they do. Jews complained to Harvard in 1922 that they were being "discriminated against" because they were only 21% of law school admissions, even though they were only 1.9% of the population and were already over-represented by 11 fold. Yet they still demanded that they be admitted in larger percentages, and now conceal the effectiveness of their demands by insisting that jews not be listed as a separate race in the census data. Why would jews want to conceal from the public that they represent more than half of students and professors at our top law schools, and more than half of our lawyers and judges? It's the ultimate hypocrisy to abuse such special privileges and use of their power as judges to force qualified White men out of industry and government through affirmative action. The enforcement of this double standard is precisely what weakened our economy and undermined our institutions, and it was accomplished by jews who actually believe that "Christians prefer sex with cows".
JEWISH JUDGES AND LAWYERS MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE
Whether or not jewish judges and lawyers intentionally sabotaged our justice system is not relevant--the simple fact that it happened precisely during their watch makes jews culpable. Public servants cannot demand such authority over people, fail so miserably in their responsibilities, and expect to continue to be rewarded for their crimes against humanity--nor to not be punished for it. While American jews complain about how unjust the Spanish Inquisition was, it did accomplish one thing, which was to rid that Christian nation of jews and establish a state of social stability which we Americans can only dream about.
FOUR DECADES OF JEWS IN LAW
With 6 million jews, there's no question that one extra American was murdered in the 20th Century for each six jews in the country. The only question is whether or not you believe their is an association. A majority of our judges are people who have been told their entire lives that they are underdogs and must get even with Christians, and that "Christians prefer sex with cows", enough to make you question this association. The extra cost of "fighting crime" (excluding that when jewish judges and lawyers "fight crime" they clearly caused an increase in crime) of $67,000/year, or $1.4 million over the last 40 years, for each jew in the country, makes this association ever more obvious. The large prison population reduces the life expectancies of two million men by an amount that's equivalent to 15,000 lives per year, or 300,000 lives over the last 40 years, which supports the desire of jewish judges to "get even with Christians for millennia of anti-Semitism". During that time, there were an *extra* 36 million divorces relative to our divorce rate *before* jews became judges, which caused another 18 million premature deaths. This is 3 premature deaths for each jew, which should help you to understand why Spain and 85 other countries before us finally exiled the jews from their land. Six million extra cancer deaths in this country can be traced directly to the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines and the failure by our justice system to stop such heinous practices, or one death per jew, a pattern which you can no longer ignore. We even have a motor vehicle fatality rate which is more than twice as high as countries who don't even have speed limits or "dui" laws, which caused the extra loss of another 1 million American lives over the last four decades:
ANTI-SEMITISM OR PRO CHRISTIANITY?
The above is a mere tip of the iceberg, but of course jews will charge that it's anti-Semitic to even mention that the loss of American lives to these internal (and eternal) enemies is 5,221 times greater than the loss of lives to Osama bin Ladin, even IF he's guiltier than sin. With the known terrorist Ariel Sharon having just taken power, and with the United Nations having just condemned Israel as a terrorist and apartheid nation THREE DAYS before 9-11, and with more than 200 Israeli Mossad agents having been arrested for spying on the US during this time, our confidence level that Ariel Sharon was the mastermind behind this attack is 100%. Permitting jews to become lawyers and judges in light of millennia of evidence of the evil consequences, and in spite of the warnings of Jesus Christ and our Founding Forefathers, created a catastrophe which is almost impossible for Americans to comprehend. It's not nearly as dramatic as watching the twin towers of the WTC crumble into dust (in a way that only the Holy Bible can describe) but it's real, and it caused the loss of 5,221 times as many American lives.
LET'S DISCUSS MASS EXPULSION OF JEWS FROM U.S.
This formerly Christian nation can easily expel 6 million jews from our midst. We can accomplish this even more easily than the jews expelled Palestinians (many of whom were fellow Christians) from Israel, and we have more than 26,015,000 reasons to do it. The equation is simple: if we don't expel the jews, the loss of American lives will double from the above figure over the next century, not even including the potential for jews to cause WWIII, nor their role in causing WWII, nor their role in killing 50-100 million White Christians in Russia.
Thank you, Carol A. Valentine, for asking.