A mamzer is a mongrel
A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to
his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD, Deuteronomy
A mamzer shall not
enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter
into the congregation of the LORD
congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer
>At 08:15 AM 12/26/2000 -0500, Pernalenin <email@example.com> whined:
>I diligently searched the message looking for a coherent sentence.
What part of "Pernalenin is a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar
mamzer" didn't you understand, Pernalenin, you congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
In the interests of helping congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzers like Pernalenin understand themselves, I shall explain:
"Congenitally lying" means that Pernalenin, as a Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer cannot help but lie from his very birth. Why? Because
Pernalenin as a khazar mamzer is the descendant of Satan who is the Father of lies.
Thus from his birth, i.e., congenitally, Pernalenin has been lying. How does one
know Pernalenin is lying? Because one sees evidence that Pernalenin is trying to
communicate some sort of "big lie" but never ever any truth.
A "Bolshevik" is the original term for Communist.
This term came about when Lenin and Trotsky, both of khazar 'jew' parentage, had a
conflict with the Social Revolutionaries, and since their clique of khazar 'jewss' were in
the majority, the term Bolshevik meant, "those in the majority."
Better than 95% of the Bolsheviks were in part or wholly
khazar jews, which murdered millions of ethnic Russians, Byleorussians, and Ukranians from
The term "schidzoid" refers to Pernalenin's evident
psychotic use of multiple personalities. Pernalenin obviously has no problem in
developing numerous aliases, but very little ability to hide the fact that all of these
aliases sound just like congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers
indistinguishable from himself. Khazar mamzers are especially prone to mental
disease from birth, i.e., congenitally, as any perusal of messages from
Lyin_Slayer/Arab_Israeli/Bad Butthead and Pernalenin/Swillcuntes/Dooshbagmohile can easily
A "Khazar" is one of a tribe of Turko-Mongollian Asiatics
related to the Huns, Turks, Magyars, Mongols, Tatars, etc., which settled in Southwestern
Russia, and approximately 740 A.D. converted to talmudic Jewdism, and became what are
known as Ashkenazi 'jews.'
A "mamzer" is a misceginated bastard produced when racial
intermixing produces some sort of quasi-hueman hybrid which is especially prone to
schidzophrenia and nervous system disorder, and which is incapable of any degree of racial
Therefore, when I refer to a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer such as Pernalenin, it should be easy to figure out to what great degree I
have catalogued this particular congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer.
>I diligently searched the message; that is below, looking for a
This is partially true, Pernalenin. As a congenitally lying
Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer, I have no doubt that you were not able to fully
understand how this precise definition of yourself fit you so very well, or why it is a
valid term of reproach to be a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer
infesting the lost sheep of the House of Israel. However, insofar as a congenitally
lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer is able to understand why being a congenitally
lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer is a bad thing, you are indeed correct,
Pernalenin, in suspecting that being called a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer is a perjorative term.
>I found nothing that any intelligent person would consider to be
>worthy of a response.
Any intelligent person is, by definition, NOT a congenitally lying
Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer. This is why, as a congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer, you were unable to frame a response to my accurate portrayal of
yourself as a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer.
>All that I found was an extremely repetitious jumble of ad hominems,
>strawmen, name calling. A political philosophy is laid bare by the
>character of those who represent it.
Exactly, Pernalenin. This is why, as a congenitally lying
Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer, you are unable to do anything other than to cut and
paste your own collection of "ad jewinems," straw-khazars, and name-calling of
your own type. Throughout your infestation of Christian Israelite and White
Nationalist Resistance listservers, you have claimed that your version of doing exactly
that which you accuse us of doing was moral, and that our ridicule of your moral leprosies
was in some way immoral. Open congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers
call this approach "chutzpa." The natural aristocracy of the White
homelands that you congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers infest then find
it necessary to offer your kind the coercive choice between emigration or extermination,
i.e., Madagascar or bust.
>It is generally not necessary to respond to an ad hominem, other than
>by pointing out that that is what it is. A person; who repeatedly
>resorts to ad hominems, has already discredited himself before every
>logical and intelligent person.
Continual and constant ridicule is a necessary temporary expedient in
dealing with congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers, although I would be
the first to allow that Mausers and Zyklon-B are far better alternatives. However,
let us not look to the failed policies of the past, but rather at what our Father promises
will be the future of Gog and Magog after their daddy, Satan the Devil is turned loose and
these Ashkenazi-gogsspawn besieges Israel & the Camp of the Saints. Rev. 20:7-9
>Fallacy: Ad Hominem- "Ad Hominem" means "against the man" or
Truth: "Ad Jewinem" means putting a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer in its proper place, i.e., bruising its head and keeping one's heel unbitten
by these biters. Genesis 3:15.
>An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or
>argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact
We come to the gravimen of the argument. Jewn Pernalenin, as a
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer says that the fact that he is a
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer is "irrelevant."
However, I, Martin Lindstedt, says that the fact that Pernalenin is a congenitally lying
Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer is not only relevant, but that understanding
Pernalenin's nature as a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer is
absolutely necessary in order to understand everything which is in dispute. Unless
one always keeps Jewn Pernalenin's inherent nature as a congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer in mind, one cannot understand anything about this dispute between
himself and Martin Lindstedt, John Knight, Willie Martin and/or Yuriy Kirienko.
>about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.
>Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against
>the character of person making the claim, his circumstances, or his
>actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the
>person reporting the claim).
Of course Pernalenin, as a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer wants everyone to forget that he is a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer. Why? Because nobody in his right mind should believe anything a
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer has to say.
>Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or
>argument the person in question is making (or presenting). The one
>who is unable to refute the message, with facts, attacks the messenger
What kind of message would a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar
mamzer make up? Answer: One in which a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar
mamzer could appear as a messenger of truth, of course. After all, since when has
Jewn Pernalenin ever started out by telling the truth by saying, "Yes, I, Jewn
Pernalenin, am a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer, but because I care
so awfully much about Martin Lindstedt, John Knight, Yuriy Kirienko, Willie Martin, and
the rest of the Christian Israelite and White Nationalist Resistance, you just have to
believe me for once."
Rather, this idiotic congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer has worked out some pat boilerplate by which he wastes bandwidth spamming
Resistance listservers. It is cut and pasted, then resent with maybe one entirely
new sentence at the very top of the new spam. The only reason why we do not hear from
Pernalenin's a-lie-asses Swillcuntes and Dooshbagmohile is because their anonymous e-mail
accounts are spammed out past the fifth day of every month.
>This is act of desperation, that is meant to be face saving. In reality,
>it is an admission of a defeat in the philosophical exchange.
When a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer cannot
'win' by virtue of telling a new and different lie, a congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer instead posts a cut&paste clinch, which the congenitally lying
Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer claims is some sort of 'victory.'
>No matter what is or is not true about the messenger, it would be
It is a characteristic of congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzers that they post some sort of "big lie" which they hope shall be
unquestioned by those who are weak-brained and so honest that they simply cannot
understand the nature of congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers like
As answered before, whether or not the person making an asservation
is a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer matters a great deal.
Would this congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer
believe it if John Knight gave this congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer a
boat ticket which said "One-way to Madagasgar" but John Knight told this
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer that it was really a round-trip
ticket to Miami Beach? Or if I gave this congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzer a shower ticket at the soap works?
Does anyone really believe that this congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer wouldn't at least question these free gifts given by hostile
Greeks? Or bring up the motivation of John Knight and myself?
>It is abominable to be reduced COMPLETELY to nothing more than attacking
Here we see the underpinnings of every congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer's holohoax effort. Jewn Pernalenin is demanding that he be
believed because it is "abominable to be reduced COMPLETELY to being attacked on the
basis of its past criminal history as a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar
mamzer." According to his talmudic belief in his special status as Satan's
Chosen Master Race of Parasites and Predators, why, his daddy has given him free access to
the goods and services of us goy-im "dog-people," especially as ritual
matzo-ball makings around Purimfest and Passover.
>Every person; who understands logic, knows that attacking the messenger
>is a last ditch desperate tactic ; that is only resorted to by a person
>who is NOT logical, AND ONLY when that person has already realized that
>there is no way TO USE LOGICAL, FACTUAL INFORMATION TO AVOID BEING
This congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer mistakes
chopping logic for logic. Very seldom can can the messenger be separated from the
message. The Greeks 'message,' supposedly from the gods of Olympus, confirming
Trojan victory was the Trojan horse. It is because the Trojans did not carefully
distinguish the messenger -- the wooden hollow horse -- from the actual genuine message --
wiley Greeks hidden inside -- Troy was destroyed.
Similarly, this congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer
would destroy Resistance listservers by spreading a message of lies and deceit.
One should always ask: of what possible use could a message from a
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer be? Especially when all that
the message is about is some idiocy about how we should witlessly trust congenitally lying
Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers.
>A person who repeatly resorts to Ad Hominems is subjecting himself to
>FAR GREATER embarrassment than it would have been to simply admit that
>he has lost the debate.
More lying nonsense. Congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid
khazar mamzers are incapable of shame or embarrassment.
>Apparently there are those who JUST CANNOT RESIST THE URGE TO CHANGE
>THE DEBATE FROM THE ISSUE TO THE PERSON. If I was the chief Rabbi of
i.e., yet another congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar
>or if I was the former head of the Gestapo,
If you were the former head of the Gestapo, Pernalenin, you
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer, could I
borrow the Mauser and have your receipe for Zyklon-B?
>it would not mean that what I say is true, and it would not mean that
>what I say is false.
Then what would it mean, Pernalenin, you congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer? Would it mean that you have nothing to do with
your time except post the same old stupid crap onto Resistance listservers?
>I have never asked anyone to believe anything, that I posted, simply
>because I am the one who posted it
Perhaps if you wished to be believed, you should reveal your true
identity and motivations, Pernalenin, you congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer.
The fact of the matter is is that you have done nothing except
demand that somebody really stupid believes anything you have to say.
You've whined about how it is "abominable" that nobody believes you
because you are a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer,
>With anyone else, there are a few points of logic; which when made clear,
>will result in the adaptation of rational conduct. This would be simply
>pointing out that:
> 1) Those who have truth on their side can argue with facts.
I have truth on my side.
It is a fact that Pernalenin is a congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer.
>and that: 2) It is only those whose arguements are fictional, who
> resort to name
calling, and personal attacks
So when are you going to stop, Pernalenin?
>and that: 3) Statements made about the messenger are irrelevant to
> the validity of the
The identity of the messenger is ALWAYS relevant to the message.
Any messenger trying to hide his identity and motivation is deliberately
sending a false message. This false message should ALWAYS be recieved
with due suspicion. If the messenger is a liar, then the message is
most likely a lie.
> If pointing these things out does not result in rational, logical,
>discussion, then we must assume that we are dealing with someone who is
>without that capability.
I and John Knight have pointed out that Pernalenin is neither
logical nor rational, and Pernalenin has most certainly proven our
points. Pernalenin has been unable to refute any of the proven
accusations against himself. Rather, Resistance listservers have
been deluged under Pernalenin's spam such as this one, in which
Pernalenin did nothing more than make up another one-sentence lie
and post his "ad hominem" spam.
>When a rational person; who is arguing for something that is TRUE,
inadvertantly makes an ad hominem, and that is pointed out, he will
>apologize, and will be more careful not to do it again. Those who
>are not arguing for the truth, in a rational manner, will repeatedly
>resort to the ad hominem.
Pernalenin again acts like a typical congenitally lying Bolshevik
schidzoid khazar mamzer. It (1) sends out hundreds of spams full of its
witless "ad hominems," (2) accuses everyone else of doing exactly that
which it does as a matter of routine, (3) never, ever makes a rational
legitimate apology, and then (4) proceeds to spam Resistance listservers
which haven't kicked it off with the same old spams. And so it goes,
forever and a day, until eventually people are forced to either banish
these mamzers from their Resistance listservers or to put a "bozo-filter"
on their e-mail boxes.
Lucky me. I have a CD-ROM cutter and infinite patience so that I
can save infinite samples of this Pernalenin pathology -- regurgitated
spam from a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer.
>Description of Straw Man fallacy
>The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores the
>actual opposing argument and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated,
>or misrepresented version of that position. A "Straw Man Argument" is a
>misrepresentation of the opposing view, set up in such a way that it is
>easy to demolish. This is meant to bring the opponent's position into
disrepute, by ascribing to him positions that he never endorsed. The
>intention is to avoid having to address the real arguments. A person
>creates a Straw Man as an easy opponent, because he is not capable of
>dealing with the issue that actually WAS presented. The person creating
>a Straw Man hopes to burden his opponent with an unpopular, or
>indefensible, position. The use of tactic is actually an admission
>of defeat on the question that was actually presented, and was evaded.
Describes Pernalenin to a "T." One never ever gets any logical or
sensible discussion of differences from Pernalenin, only endless spam after Pernalenin has
written a sentence or two at the very top of the cut&paste spam.
If one were to answer Pernalenin at length, Pernalenin never
goes into the matter discussed. Rather, it is an opportunity for telling the same
old lies atop the same old spam.
Has anyone else noticed that Lyin_Slayer/ArabIsraeli/Bad
Butthead is the exact same way?
Now I am not implying that Pernalenin and Bad Butthead are the
exact same congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer. However, as
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzers, they are pretty much
interchangeable parts, aren't they?
Martin Lindstedt wrote:
Pernalenin, as a khazar 'jew' of falsified religion and race
in perpetual war against White Christian America, your posturing regarding how you are
opposed to your kind's enmity against the Sons of God (cf. Genesis 3:15) are no more to
believed than a Bolshevik Khazar Commissar's profession of love for the ethnic Ukranians,
Russians, and Byleorussians your kind murdered from 1917-1945. It would be as
believable as seeing a rat urinate on human food supplies in a grain silo while professing
an undying love for humanity.
The fact of the matter is that you have become a comic-book
characture of the evil hook-nosed Bolshevik kike who infests the upper echilons of pretend
blight-wing organizations. I doubt that you are a genuine Bircher, because while
every single rank-and-file Bircher I've ever seen believes in a NWO Conspiracy Theory of
the Month, every single one of them also believes that evil khazar 'jews' are the
masterminds of that conspiracy. So then you come along, yapping the Bolshevik Khazar
Kommissar line of "Jews are good, Jews are good," and like a rabid rabbi caught
with his pecker in the three-year-old shiska, you seek to invoke some talmudisms about how
us stupid goyim cattle are supposed to love you jews and muds regardless of the mischief
we just caught you doing.
Fat chance of that happening, Pernalenin. As said before, you
and your various alieasses have descended to being nothing more than khazar mamzer
>>Martin Lindstedt wrote:
>> Pernalenin, as a schidzoid khazar mamzer*, I suppose you
>> expected to keep your lies in order since you are a congenital liar*.
>A person who resorts to childish name calling reveals more about
>himself than about the person who he insults*
Pernalenin, I can see how you wish to change the subject from you
being a ratlike congenitally lying schidzoid khazar mamzer.* However, the fact that
I am a Christian Israelite with an interest in revealing you as a ratlike congenitally
lying schidzoid khazar mamzer,* you ratlike congenitally lying schidzoid khazar mamzer,*
reveals nothing other than the fact that I am a Christian Israelite with an interest in
revealing you as a ratlike congenitally lying schidzoid khazar mamzer.*
If, upon your satanic wanderings as a Bolshevik Khazar Commissar and
ratlike congenitally lying schidzoid khazar mamzer,* you come across any Christian
Israelite child calling you a ratlike congenitally lying schidzoid Bolshevik khazar
mamzer,* please let me know so that I can get this precocious Resistance talent which
instinctively knows a ratlike congenitally lying Bolshevik khazar mamzer* when he sees one
into a scholarship of a Christian Israelite seminary.
>>Martin Lindstedt wrote:
>> That said, do you remember when after you removed John
>> others from your ostensible JewBitchSociety* egroups.com listserver,
>> you justified your jew-style censorship ban by telling all and sundry
>> who would listen that you were not going to spam Christian Israelite
>> or White Nationalist listservers?
>No one has ever been removed from either of the lists, that I moderate.
>Those who seek to pervert love of God and country into hatred of ethnic
>minorities tried to put their hatespeak into BOTH of the egroups, that I
>Those groups are JBirch@egroups.com and
>Both of these groups have rules against attacks on races or religions.
>Everyone, who joins these groups should be aware of this.
>They are both moderated groups, and messages that violate the rules are
>They kicked up, when I restored these groups to their defined focus.
>I have had only a little problem with them in either one of those groups,
This is a congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer's
Talmudic rational for doing exactly what I accused him of doing to John Knight and others.
First this congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer
censorship-bans Christian Israelites like John Knight from his pretend JewBitcher paytriot
listserver, then he spams every Christian Israelite and White Nationalist listserver he
can get upon. Never mind Jewn Pernalenin's talmudisms justifying a ratlike
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer acting exactly like a ratlike
congenitally lying Bolshevik schidzoid khazar mamzer is going to act regardless, what Jewn
Pernalenin admits is exactly that which I have alleged.
[Remainder excised for sake of brevity. Pernalenin didn't have any intelligible
answer to that response either.]