Misandry vs. Misogyny
[mɪ.ˈsæn.dri]) is the hatred of
as opposed to
misogyny, the hatred of women; or
misanthropy, hatred of the human species. Misandry comes from misos (Greek
μῖσος, "hatred") + andr-ia (Greek
anér-andros, "man"). Those holding
misandric beliefs can be of either sex.
Copyright ï¿½ 2000 The Fathers' Manifesto
Please distribute freely, all portions intact
October 17, 2000
very aptly demonstrated how feminists worldwide use the charge of misogyny to
"debate" men in their never-ending diatribe to prove that men and women are
"equal", while out the other sides of their mouths claim that men are "more
violent" than women, or that the only reason that boys score higher than girls on
almost every standardized test, math or verbal or quantitative or analytical, is that men
"harass" or "discriminate against" women
How much more unequal could we be?
It is harassment to feminists that men request of women that they answer a simple math
question, whereas to most men this is simple math. How much more unequal could the sexes
This harassment by itself is reason enough for feminists that women fail, while men just
get the job done. This is "equal" by whose definition?
When all the ad hominems and straw man arguments and slurs are removed from the feminist
argument, there is nothing left but hot air, just as there is nothing left but hot air
when feminists list all of the benefits women as a group received after the Nineteenth
Amendment was passed. There are 36 social and economic indicators which millions of men
can read and understand well enough to know what this amendment did to our culture, and
that not one of them is positive for women. Jenny, who claimed to be a "maths
expert", and who claimed to have an iq of 168 in mathematics, was kind enough to
prove to us why women don't entertain such abstract concepts by refusing to even tackle a
tenth grade algebra problem: it requires a rudimentary understanding and trust of
probability and statistics which Jenny doesn't have, and which TIMSS proved that zero
percent of American 12th grade girls have.
This lack of knowledge of math, and the inability to learn it, is why feminists distrust
science and math, why feminists always say things like: "I trust my 'opinion' [read:
feelings] better than cold numbers", or "you can prove anything with
statistics". If this were at all true, American feminists would have wasted no time
whatsoever "proving" that 100% of American 12th grade girls correctly solved
100% of the TIMSS math, science, and physics problems, and that women have *always*
outperformed men in all the standardized tests. But they didn't and they can't because
this is a feminist fallacy. Instead, TIMSS proved that not even the math experts who have
manipulated American voters' opinions of public education through their control of the SAT
test and SAT scores could get away with it forever.
Many of the statistical analyses and data citations on the Fathers' Manifesto web site
have been read by feminists, radical men, and N.O.W. members for more than five years now.
The site has been made as accurate as possible--where reputable private sources dispute
government sources, the private sources are considered valid, but the government sources
are cited. To give feminists the opportunity to critique the FM site, intentional errors
have been introduced in the calculations, though the correct answers are always used in
the analyses. Numerous insults, slurs, and cries of bias and misogyny, are received daily,
but not one time have feminists ever pointed out even one error--not even the known
iow, we have yet to receive a valid critique of the FM web site from a feminist.
iow, there isn't a feminist in the country who has the intellect to even understand the FM
web site, much less to critique it.
Their slurs have NEVER been based on reason--they have ALL been based on pure
emotion--which is a far, far cry from "equality" with men.
With such a dearth of intellect, it's easy to understand how any two bit organization like
N.O.W. can come along and LIE with numbers and never have their members even challenge
those LIES. This is part of the reason that feminists accept the feminist fallacy that
"you can prove anything with statistics", and why those feminists who tried to
do that all got caught, and why they were all rightfully discredited, and why the only
thing history will recall about them is their LIES, and why affirmative-action-hired
journalists now propagate those lies without even the basic sanity check which was the
hallmark of American journalism just half a century ago--and why the jewish controlled
American media now has an apparent lockstep on mainstream opinion.
And why Christians around the world understand why Jesus Christ would be indicted today
under the laws of this formerly great Christian nation, for calling jews "you brood
of vipers", they will be "thrown into the fire", "hypocrites!",
"babbling like pagans", "wicked", "adulterous",
"Ninevah will ... condemn [you]", "you break the command of God",
"teachings are but rules taught by men", "will be pulled up by the
roots", "blind guides", "blind man", "guard against ... the
teachings of the Pharisees and Sadducees", "you yourself do not enter ... the
kingdom of heaven", "blind fools", "blind men", "Blind
Pharisee", "you are like whitewashed tombs", "you are the descendants
of those who murdered the prophets", "you snakes", "condemned to
hell", "Pharisees ... rejected God's purpose for themselves", "you
foolish people", "you are like unmarked graves", "you build tombs for
the prophets, yet it was your forefathers who killed them", and that jews "will
be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the
beginning of the world".
To feminists, Jesus Christ was a misogynist, a racist, and a religious bigot, and if He
were around today, they would support Janet Reno's assault on His temple just as readily
as feminists supported her assault on Mount Carmel in Waco.