American Highway Holocaust
Download an Excel Spreadsheet of the original data for analysis here.
There were 58,847 drivers involved in 41,967 traffic fatalities in the US in 1997, which is a Motor Vehicle Fatality Rate of 15.6. Per the 1999 US Statistical Abstract international comparison of statistics http://www.census.gov/prod/99pubs/99statab/sec30.pdf this is 45.8% higher than Germany's rate of 10.7 and almost three times higher than England's rate of 5.6. Had our MVFR been equivalent to Germany's, there would have been 13,181 fewer Americans killed on the highways that year, and if it had been equivalent to England's, 26,900 fewer Americans would have died. In a two year period, this extraordinary MVFR caused the deaths of more Americans than died during the entire Vietnam War. If it continues like this for the next three decades, with normal population growth, we will have another 968,400 *extra* highway deaths compared to England, twice as many Americans as died during all of the wars ever fought by the US.
The following summary of the data from the FARS database totally disputes MADD's claims:
Review and/or critique the original spreadsheet with this data and the calculations.
AMERICAN NIGGERS TRIPLE OUR FATAL ACCIDENT RATE
In 1994, an American driver was three times more likely than a driver in Sweden or England to be killed in a traffic accident, twice as likely as a driver in Italy, Portugal, or Spain, and 50% more likely than a driver in Switzerland, Scotland, Germany, Denmark, Canada, or Australia. Between 1994 and 1998, our fatality rate increased 4% to 16.2, an indication that the federal government has not gotten a handle on this problem. The UN reports that 90% of all fatal accidents are in "poverty areas" [read: nigger infested countries], even though poverty stricken niggers have less than 1% as many cars per capita as industrialize nations, proof that the root cause of our high rate of traffic deaths is niggers:
ETHIOPIAN DRIVERS 134 TIMES MORE DEADLY THAN ENGLISH DRIVERS
Ethiopia with a population of 73 million and 1.5 cars per 1,000 people has 109,000 cars which are involved in 1,800 fatal crashes per year, or one fatal crash for every 60 cars. The UK with a population of 60.4 million and 434 cars per 1,000 people has 26.2 million cars which are involved in 3,262 fatal crashes per year, or one fatal crash for every 8,031 cars. A car driven by an Ethiopian is 134 times more likely to kill someone than a car driven by an Englishman.
It's not practical for Ethiopians to have cars. If all Ethiopians had cars, and if they had a life expectancy of 60 years, all Ethiopians would be killed in car accidents in less than 60 years.
KENYAN CARS--TRANSPORTATION, OR LETHAL WEAPONS?
The following table from the UN first needs to be interpreted. "Low/middle" income means blacks, and "high" income means Whites. Note that there is no category for "high" income in the African Region, suggesting that Whites in South Africa and Rwanda were included in this table and thus caused the figure for Africa to be lower than if it was only blacks. It confirms that blacks in general, even though their ownership of motor vehicles is less than 1% that of Whites, are two to three times more likely than Whites [read: "high income" in "region of the Americas", and "high income" in "European Region"], and Western Asians [read: "high income" in "Western Pacific Region"], to have a fatal traffic accident.
It reveals that the average rate of 28.3 for African nations is twice as high as that for North America and three times as high as that for Western European nations.
With Kenya's population of 37.5 million and their ownership rate of 14 cars per 1,000, they have only 525,000 cars. If their fatal accident rate is equivalent to the average for Africa of of 28.3 per 100,000, then they have 10,612 fatalities per year, which means they have one fatal accident for every 49 cars and one fatal accident for each 5 cars over the course of one single decade. If Kenyans had as many cars per capita as most European nations, they'd all be dead well within a half century
For what reason should we believe that American blacks would drive any safer than their genetic brethren in Ethiopia or Kenya or other parts of Africa, or that American Whites would drive any more dangerously than their racial brethren in the UK or Sweden, or that "IQ of Drivers" doesn't track perfectly with Professor Lynn's "IQ of Nations"?
2,870 men and 442 women were killed in accidents involving cycles, snowmobiles, farm and construction equipment, and other vehicles which don't contribute to highway mileage. When adjusted for these accidents, the average fatality rate for men drivers drops by 9.4% (from 31.9 to 28.9) and for women drivers by 2.2% (from 43.9 to 42.9). This adjustment increases the accident rate for women from 38% higher than men to 48% higher.
The known lower average hand/eye coordination, SAT scores, work ethics, and employee competence as measured by lower incomes, of blacks and women, should cause a just society to seriously reconsider the impact that such drivers are predicted to have on such a high MVFR over the next three decades. The annual odds of an American being killed in a traffic accident is 1 in 6,314, compared to 1 in 9,346 for a German and 1 in 17,857 for an Englishman. The annual odds of an American driver being involved in a fatal accident are 1 in 4,503, 1 in 6,676 for a German driver are, and 1 in 12,755 for an Englishman. Both Germany and England have no or very high speed limits, in contrast to 55 to 65 mph in the US, and 70% of German drivers openly acknowledge that they drink and drive, proof that our accident rate can be reduced, and that neither the speed limits nor drinking and driving laws are the way to do it:
If speed limits & drinking and driving laws don't work, then what does?
The NHTSA data shows that White men [that is, all men besides black men] have the lowest fatality rate in the US, at 31 fatal accidents per billion miles driven. Black women on the other hand have a rate almost three times higher, at 91.9. In between are White women at 48.4 and black men at 65.1. If only White men drove on our roads and highways, there would be 9,270 fewer highway fatalities per year, which would reduce our odds of dying in a traffic fatality to one out of 8,105, not too far off from Germany's odds of 9,346 but still almost twice as high as England's. Conversely, if only black women drove there would be 54,946 more fatalities, if only black men drove there would be 26,696 more, and if only White women drove there would be 9,040 more.
The fact that both blacks and women drive in both Germany and
England suggests that there's more involved than their higher propensity to have a fatal
accident, but Autobahns in Germany look much like our freeways (since our freeways were
copied after the Autobahn concept). The mistake we made was not copying the laws
too. With no speed limits, with cars driving literally 120 miles per hour, with much
worse weather than most parts of the US, with a population density more than 8 times
greater ( 590 inhabitants per square mile in Germany vs. ours of 72), with much
mountainous terrain, our motor vehicle fatality rate is consistently 50% higher than
Germany's, which by itself disproves the cynical hypotheses that "speed kills"
or "drinking and driving kills". With the high population density of
Germany, it's not too hard to understand how traffic congestion would build up pretty fast
if they drove only 55 mph, which provides insight into why Germany has such a low MVFR.
The Montana "paradox" is an example of Americans discovering that the Autobahns they copied from Germany DO work as intended, IF they are used as they were originally designed--for high speed and low congestion, which of course go hand in hand. The cynical hypothesis that a driver in his own car seeing the road and cars around him isn't as good a decision maker about how to operate his own car as a judge sitting on a wooden bench in a remote location, under fluorescent lights, all day, is totally unsupported by the data: AND repugnant to the US Constitution. Bureaucrats and lawmakers must think that as soon as a responsible citizen gets into his car, he suddenly becomes a child who must have bureaucrats making decisions for him which even children are capable of making in their own sand boxes without the aid of the law.
Montana, Germany, and England are proof that citizens are not
that childish, and that American judges are not that smart. They in fact are living
proof [or in the case of the EXTRA millions of traffic deaths, are deadly proof] that the
cynicism which buried the US under such a mountain of laws IS the problem.
THE MONTANA PARADOX IS NOT A PARADOX
The real "paradox" is that so many Americans would
accept that drinking drivers are a road hazard when easily available data proves that it
was only non-drinking drivers who were involved 72% of fatal accidents by men drivers and
90.5% of fatal accidents by women drivers. This by itself should cause thinking
citizens to question the feminist mantra that "drinking drivers cause accidents"
even before considering the low percentage of Americans who have an accident when they
drink and drive.
MVFR overview from the National Transportation Safety Board
Overall, women drivers are 38% more likely per mile driven to have a fatal traffic accident, but when pedestrian, snow mobile, farm and construction machinery, go cart, motor cycle, and other high risk, low highway mileage vehicle accidents are removed, that increases to 46% more. This higher accident rate of women increases the accident rate for men by 28%, so if only men drove all the miles currently driven by both men and women, the fatal accident rate per billion miles would be 23 and the total number of fatal accidents on the highways would be 34,500, which is 15,425 or 31% fewer fatal accidents.
Not including men pedestrians who were killed by women drivers, which show up in the statistics as a man fatality, more than 10,000 traffic fatalities per year, 6,200 of which are men, are due solely and directly to the higher propensity for women to have an accident.
One fiftieth as many wives are murdered by their husbands, yet Congress spends billions of dollars to try to curb "domestic violence". One eighth as many children are murdered by their mothers, yet Congress spends hundreds of billions of dollars per year to enforce CAPTA (under the Mondale Act) to curb child abuse. Half as many men died in combat in Vietnam each year. If you are naive enough to believe the completely absurd proposition that DUI laws work, then you believe that these laws saved less than a quarter as many lives each year. One third as many women are murdered, yet we spend $390 billion per year make American men one third of the men in the world behind bars in order to reduce crime One half as many women commit suicide.
Women are not allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia. Permitting American women to drive in the US is directly responsible for one million additional deaths on the roads and highways in the Twentieth Century.
Modified Friday, December 18, 2009
Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party