Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

 

Narus

more jew spyware

 

 

The Newbie's Guide to Detecting the NSA
Submitted by davidswanson on Thu, 2006-06-29 12:28. Spying

http://blog.wired.com
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/12539

It's not surprising that an expert hired by EFF should produce an
analysis that supports the group's case against AT&T. But last week's
public court filing of a redacted statement by J. Scott Marcus is still
worth reading for the obvious expertise of its author, and the cunning
insights he draws from the AT&T spy documents.

An internet pioneer and former FCC advisor who held a Top Secret
security clearance, Marcus applies a Sherlock Holmes level of reasoning
to his dissection of the evidence in the case: 120-pages of AT&T manuals
that EFF filed under seal, and whistleblower Mark Klein's observations
inside the company's San Francisco switching center.

If you've been following Wired News' coverage of the EFF case, you won't
find many new hard revelations in Marcus' analysis -- at least, not in
the censored version made public. But he connects the dots to draw some
interesting conclusions:

The AT&T documents are authentic. That AT&T insists they remain under
seal is evidence enough of this, but Marcus points out that the writing
style is pure Bell System, with the "meticulous attention to detail that
is typical of AT&T operations."

There may be dozens of surveillance rooms in AT&T offices around the
country. Among other things, Marcus finds that portions of the documents
are written to cover a number of different equipment rack
configurations, "consistent with a deployment to 15 to 20" secret rooms.

The internet surveillance program covers domestic traffic, not just
international traffic. Marcus notes that the AT&T spy rooms are "in far
more locations than would be required to catch the majority of
international traffic"; the configuration in the San Francisco office
promiscuously sends all data into the secret room; and there's no
reliable way an analysis could infer a user's physical location from
their IP address. This, of course, directly contradicts President Bush's
description of the "Terrorist Surveillance Program."

The system is capable of looking at content, not just addresses. The
configuration described in the Klein documents -- presumably the Narus
software in particular -- "exists primarily to conduct sophisticated
rule-based analysis of content", Marcus concludes.
My bullet points don't come close to conveying the painstaking reasoning
he lays out to back each of his conclusions.

Perhaps the most interesting -- and, in retrospect, obvious -- point
Marcus makes is that AT&T customers aren't the only ones apparently
being tapped. "Transit" traffic originating with one ISP and destined
for another is also being sniffed if it crosses AT&T's network.
Ironically, because the taps are installed at the point at which that
network connects to the rest of the world, the safest web surfers are
AT&T subscribers visiting websites hosted on AT&T's network. Their
traffic doesn't pass through the splitters.

With that in mind, here's the 27B Stroke 6 guide to detecting if your
traffic is being funneled into the secret room on San Francisco's Folsom
street.

If you're a Windows user, fire up an MS-DOS command prompt. Now type
tracert followed by the domain name of the website, e-mail host, VoIP
switch, or whatever destination you're interested in. Watch as the
program spits out your route, line by line.

C:\> tracert nsa.gov

1 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 12.110.110.204
[...]
7 11 ms 14 ms 10 ms as-0-0.bbr2.SanJose1.Level3.net [64.159.0.218]
8 13 12 19 ms ae-23-56.car3.SanJose1.Level3.net [4.68.123.173]
9 18 ms 16 ms 16 ms 192.205.33.17
10 88 ms 92 ms 91 ms tbr2-p012201.sffca.ip.att.net [12.123.13.186]
11 88 ms 90 ms 88 ms tbr1-cl2.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.10.41]
12 89 ms 97 ms 89 ms tbr1-cl4.wswdc.ip.att.net [12.122.10.29]
13 89 ms 88 ms 88 ms ar2-a3120s6.wswdc.ip.att.net [ 12.123.8.65]
14 102 ms 93 ms 112 ms 12.127.209.214
15 94 ms 94 ms 93 ms 12.110.110.13
16 * * *
17 * * *
18 * *

In the above example, my traffic is jumping from Level 3 Communications
to AT&T's network in San Francisco, presumably over the OC-48 circuit
that AT&T tapped on February 20th, 2003, according to the Klein docs.

The magic string you're looking for is sffca.ip.att.net. If it's present
immediately above or below a non-att.net entry, then -- by Klein's
allegations -- your packets are being copied into room 641A, and from
there, illegally, to the NSA.

Of course, if Marcus is correct and AT&T has installed these secret
rooms all around the country, then any att.net entry in your route is a
bad sign.

http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/index.blog?entry_id=1510938


horizontal rule

 

> Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: All About NSA's and AT&T's Big Brother
> Machine, the Narus 6400
>
>
> AT&T just absorbed my provider SBC dsl... as soon as
> the 6 mo contract is up....
> i'll get me an independent, if there's such a
> creature by now.
>
>
> You really wonder why BushCo doesn't want to talk
> about this stuff?
> It's the biggest invasion of privacy in history by
> several orders of
> magnitude.
>
> the question is not if they are guilty, but when
> they will hang for Treason.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: ipakatawo
> To: <heroay@sbcglobal.net>
> Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 5:03 PM
> Subject: Fwd: All About NSA's and AT&T's Big Brother
> Machine, the Narus 6400
>
>
>                 The Proactive News Radio Show/Email
> Alert
> Host:
> Bill Brumbaugh
>
>
>
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/8/14724/28476
>
>
>
> All About NSA's and AT&T's Big Brother Machine, the
> Narus 6400
>
> by bewert
> Fri Apr 07, 2006 at 10:47:24 PM PDT
>
> Earlier today we found out that the EFF had sued
> AT&T over their
> secret work with the NSA on surveillance of millions
> of US citizens
> without wiretaps. We learned that paragraph 65 of
> this complaint shows
> EFF is trying to turn it into a nationwide Class
> Action suit covering
> all current and former customers (any after 9/2001)
> of AT&T. And we
> learned that a retired AT&T technician had stepped
> forward and
> disclosed the installation of secret NSA spy
> equipment in the San
> Francisco trunk facility. As well as the belief that
> similar equipment
> is in place in Seattle, San Jose, Los Angeles and
> San Diego.
>
> Specifically, this equipment was the Narus ST-6400,
> a machine that was
> capable of monitoring over 622 Mbits/second in real
> time in May, 2000,
> and capturing anything that hits its' semantic (i.e.
> the meaning of
> the content) triggers. The latest generation is
> called NarusInsight,
> capable of monitoring 10 billion bits of data per
> second.
>
> Follow me over the jump and let's learn some more
> about the private
> company Narus, it's founder Ovi Cohen, and board
> member Bill Crowell.
> Shall we?
> bewert's diary :: ::
>
> Narus is a private company founded in 1997 by Ori
> Cohen, who had been
> in charge of technology development for VDONet, an
> early media
> streaming pioneer. It has venture funding from an
> all-star team of
> investors including JP Morgan Partners, Mayfield,
> NeoCarta, Presidio
> Venture Partners, Walden International, Intel, NTT
> Software and
> Sumisho Electronics.
>
> Of note is that while Hoover's company factsheet on
> Narus continues to
> list Mr. Cohen as Chairman, while Narus's own
> website listing of the
> Board of Directors no longer mentions Mr. Cohen.
>
> Prior to 9/11 Narus worked on building carrier-grade
> tools to analyze
> IP network traffic for billing purposes, to prevent
> what they term
> "revenue leakage". Post-9/11 they have continued
> down that path while
> adding more semantic monitoring abilities for
> surveillance purposes.
> They even brought in former Deputy Director of the
> NSA William P.
> Crowell as an addition to their Board of Directors.
> From the Press
> Release announcing this:
>
> Crowell is an independent security consultant and
> holds several board
> positions with a variety of technology and
> technology-based security
> companies. Since 9/11, Crowell has served on the
> Defense Advanced
> Research Projects Agency (DARPA) Task Force on
> Terrorism and
> Deterrence, the National Research Council Committee
> on Science and
> Technology for Countering Terrorism and the Markle
> Foundation Task
> Force on National Security in the Information Age.
>
> His past positions have included president and chief
> executive officer
> of Cylink, a leading provider of e-business security
> solutions, as
> well as a series of senior positions at the National
> Security Agency,
> including deputy director of operations and deputy
> director of the
> Agency. Crowell has served as chairman of the
> President's Export
> Council (PEC) Subcommittee on Encryption, which
> worked with the
> Administration, Congress and private industry to
> substantially loosen
> restrictions on the export of encryption products
> and technology.
>
> "Narus has an impressive track record of working
> with tier-one
> carriers to keep their networks running safely,
> continuously and
> profitably," said William Crowell. "I look forward
> to helping Narus as
> they forge new strategic partnerships and continue
> to break new ground
> in the telecommunications industry."
>
> So these guys (1) build hugely cool network
> monitoring devices and (2)
> are tied into US (at least) national security
> organizations at the
> highest levels. What are these hugely cool machines
> capable of?
>
> From the Key Features list of NarusInsight
> -Universal data collection from links, routers, soft
> switches,
> IDS/IPS, databases, etc. provides total network view
> across the
> world's largest IP networks.
>
> -Normalization, Correlation, Aggregation and
> Analysis provide a
> comprehensive and detailed model of user, element,
> protocol,
> application and network behaviors, in real time.
>
> -Seven 9s reliability from data collection to data
> processing and
> analysis.
>
> -Industry-leading packet processing performance that
> supports network
> speeds of up to OC-192 at layer 4 and OC-48 at layer
> 7, enabling
> carriers to monitor traffic at either the edge of
> the network or at
> the core.
>
> -Unsurpassed and limitless scalability to support
> the world's largest,
> most complex IP networks.
>
> -Unparalleled flexibility -- NarusInsight's
> functionality can easily
> be configured to meet any specific customer
> requirement (Narus
> Software Developer Kit -SDK).
>
> -Unparalleled extensibility -- NarusInsight's
> functionality can easily
> be configured to feed a particular activity or IP
> service such as
> security, lawful intercept or even Skype detection
> and blocking.
>
> How powerful is this? OC-192 carries about 10
> gigabits of data per
> second.  Ten billion bits per second, monitored in
> real-time. That is
> stunning. This is one damned powerful machine, one
> of the most
> powerful I've ever heard of in 25 years in IT.
>
> And what does it monitor while looking at this 10
> billion bits of IP
> data per second? First lets take a look at what the
> network model is,
> the OSI model of seven layers. NarusInsight focuses
> on two layers:
> number four, the transport layer, built on standards
> like TCP and UDP,
> the physical building blocks of internet data
> traffic, and number
> seven, the application layer, built on standards
> like HTTP and FTP,
> which are dependent on the application using them,
> i.e. Internet
> Explorer, Kazaa, Skype, etc. It monitors 10 billion
> bits per second at
> level four and 2500 million bits per second at level
> seven. For
> reference, the 256K DSL line I am using equals .25
> million bits per
> second. So one NarusInsight machine can look at
> about 39,000 DSL lines
> at once in great detail. That is a pretty damn big
> number. This is
> some really serious hardware with equally serious
> software. Which is
> our next subject.
>
> So what exactly is done to and with this data?
> That's kind of a grey
> area, so let's try to find what we can. The starting
> point is called
> the Internet Protocol Detail Record, which Narus
> helped found. From
> that FAQ I just linked to, we learn that
>
> IPDR stands for the Internet Protocol Detail Record,
> the name comes
> from the traditional telecom term CDR (Call Detail
> Record), used to
> record information about usage activity within the
> telecom
> infrastructure (such as a call completion).
>
> NDM-U stands for Network Data Management - Usage. It
> refers to a
> functional operation within the Telecom Management
> Forum's Telecom
> Operations Map. The NDM function collects data from
> devices and
> services in a service providers network. Usage
> refers to the type of
> data which is the focus of this document.
>
> IPDR.org is the non-profit organization that
> promotes use of the IPDR
> NDM-U and other related standards. The principle
> deliverable for
> IPDR.org is the NDM-U specification and related
> development tools.
> And is it actually being used?
>
> IPDR.org has been in existence since 1999 and more
> than a dozen
> vendors have actual IPDR implementations "etched in
> code". Their
> systems are actually able to talk to each other and
> interoperate.
> Version 2.5 and up of the NDM-U represents a stable
> basis for
> development. IPDR.org's Interoperability Pavilion is
> a working
> demonstration of multiple companies exchanging
> service usage data in
> that format.
>
> Service usage data. That would be data on the actual
> usage of the
> Internet. And what kind of data would this be? Way
> back in 1999, this
> article stated
>
> In an effort to provide more complex network traffic
> analysis, Narus
> is introducing its semantic network traffic service.
> The company cites
> research which predicts the fast-growing ISP sector
> will become
> stagnant without the ability to offer differentiated
> services. In
> order to gain significant revenues from these
> services, a technology
> was necessary to allow usage based pricing.
>
> "We realized that, at the heart of the data that is
> needed to
> accurately measure usage and enable 'pay-as-you-go'
> business models
> for Internet service providers, is what we call the
> 'semantics' of
> network traffic," said Ori Cohen, Narus' founder and
> chief executive
> officer.
>
> "In short, by seeing the 'semantics' of network
> traffic, service
> providers can see 'inside' the data, providing much
> more detailed
> insight about the use of the Internet and the
> perceived value of
> specific applications than existing technologies
> allow."
>
> Semantic Traffic Analysis uses network technology to
> consistently
> capture and analyze all IP data streams on heavily
> trafficked networks
> remotely and non-invasively. In addition, the
> semantics of the data
> stream are determined also, as well as the protocol
> used and the
> application taking place. A variety of other data is
> available as
> well.
>
> Remember that semantics is not just the data, but
> rather the meaning
> of the data. It looks at the the data in a more
> comprehensive way than
> looking for keywords. Each NarusInsight machine does
> this at 2500
> million bits per second, in real-time.
>
> You really wonder why BushCo doesn't want to talk
> about this stuff?
> It's the biggest invasion of privacy in history by
> several orders of
> magnitude.
>
> How can we know? From Narus' Lawful Intercept and
> Regulatory
> Compliance page:
>
> Explosive Internet growth in recent years has
> transformed worldwide
> communications, yielding tremendous efficiencies and
> benefits, as well
> as many risks.
>
> For example, terrorist attacks around the globe have
> been carefully
> orchestrated through Internet-based forms of
> communications such as
> e-mail, messaging, hidden Web pages and now VoIP,
> forcing governmental
> organizations and law enforcement agencies to
> re-evaluate how they are
> providing public security as it becomes so much
> easier and faster to
> communicate electronically.
>
> Recent mandates and the resulting standards
> referenced under CALEA in
> the United States and ETSI in Western Europe aim to
> preserve the right
> of law enforcement agencies to conduct authorized
> electronic
> surveillance in an effort to protect the public and
> its right to
> privacy. However, these mandates create IT headaches
> for carriers as
> they struggle to meet the requirements.
>
> With a suite of products targeted at meeting lawful
> intercept
> requirements, Narus simplifies lawful intercept
> tasks helping carriers
> and agencies meet requirements without experiencing
> any degradation in
> service quality.
>
> Key benefits
> -Packet-mode data intercepts for Service Providers
> and Carriers.
> -Wireline to wireless and WiFi or dialup to
> broadband.
> -"Instant Compliance" with CALEA and ETSI for
> simple, fast and
> hands-free compliance.
> -Carrier-grade speeds, performance and scalability.
> -Supports all of your services, out-of-the-box.
> -Securely manages resources while simplifying audits
> and reporting.
> -Network and vendor agnostic.
> -Enables additional application for revenue
> generation or revenue
> protection.
>
> This data flows right into NarusInsight Intercept
> Suite, which enables
> Packet-level, flow-level, and application-level
> usage information is
> captured and analyzed as well as raw user session
> packets for forensic
> analysis, surveillance or in satisfying regulatory
> compliance for
> lawful intercept.
>
> The Lawful Intercept module offers carriers and
> service providers
> compliance with regulatory requirements regarding
> lawful intercept.
> The Lawful Intercept module provides an end-to-end
> solution consisting
> of Administration, Access and Delivery functions.
> The Lawful Intercept
> module is compliant with CALEA and ETSI standards.
> It can be
> seamlessly integrated with third party products for
> testing/validation
> or as a complete law enforcement solution.
>
> The Directed Analysis module seamlessly integrates
> with NarusInsight
> Secure Suite or other DDoS, intrusion or anomaly
> detection systems,
> securely providing analysts with real-time, surgical
> targeting of
> suspect information (from flow to application to
> full packets). The
> Directed Analyis module provides industry standard
> formats and offers
> tools for archival and integration with third party
> investigative
> tools.
>
> These capabilities include playback of streaming
> media (i.e. VoIP),
> rendering of web pages, examination of e-mail and
> the ability to
> analyze the payload/attachments of e-mail or file
> transfer protocols.
> Narus partner products offer the ability to quickly
> analyze
> information collected by the Directed Analysis or
> Lawful Intercept
> modules. When Narus partners' powerful analytic
> tools are combined
> with the surgical targeting and real-time collection
> capabilities of
> Directed Analysis and Lawful Intercept modules,
> analysts or law
> enforcement agents are provided capabilities that
> have been
> unavailable thus far.
>
> Imagine how great a tool "instant compliance" with
> the Communications
> Assistance for Law Enforcement Act could be with
> this kind of reach
> and detail. Especially if a secret Presidential
> Directive allows it to
> be used without the warrants required under the Act.
>
> That's what it appears we are up against, folks.
> Real-time semantic
> data monitoring on a huge scale. A scale beyond what
> most of us can
> even comprehend. It's scary.
>
> Tags: EFF, NSA, spying, Bush, AT&T, warrantless
> wiretaps (all tags) 
>
>

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party