"This movement among the JEWS is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), THIS WORLD-WIDE CONSPIRACY FOR THE OVERTHROW OF CIVILIZATION AND FOR THE RECONSTITUTION OF SOCIETY ON THE BASIS OF ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT, OF ENVIOUS MALEVOLENCE, AND IMPOSSIBLE EQUALITY, HAS BEEN STEADILY GROWING." Winston Churchill in Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920.
These "protocols" are very revealing of the nature of jews, not because they themselves have been proven to be completely accurate, but because of the duplicitous manner in which jews deal with them. If Christians believed that such writings were a fraud, as jews claim that the "protocols" are, then Christians would welcome wide open public debate about them to prove their case. But that's not what jews do. Instead, jews claim in one sentence that they don't want to boycott bookstores which carry the "protocols", and in the very next breath call for a boycott of those same bookstores.
Consider the following statement from http://aish.com/issues/protocols_petition.asp
Now consider the next page of that url which asks the question:
Well, I'll tell you what I think. I think you should decide which side of the fence you are on and stick to your guns. Either tell B&N that you are going to boycott them and quit claiming that you aren't, or tell them that you are NOT going to boycott them and quit promoting a boycott.
This duplicity is the classic demonstration of the very valid concerns of those who wrote the "protocols" in the first place. The credibility of the "protocols" is enhanced rather than diminished by the hyper-emotional reaction they elicit from jews. If they were a clear fraud, and if a reasonable person reading them could easily detect that they are a fraud, then there is nothing that jews could do better to discredit them than to promote them wildly. Instead, jews go to great lengths to censor all discussion and silence the debaters by accusing them of "hate". This childish reaction alone makes a thorough reading of the "Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" a very worthwhile endeavor for Christians.
We all know why they don't, of course. We all know that jews know that the "protocols" strike too close to the truth. We all know that the jews know that the "protocols" are a perfect reflection of the tenets of the Talmud. Jews aren't worried that people will think that the "protocols" are an exact reflection of a meeting between jews, but that this will raise legitimate questions about the philosophy outlined in the Talmud. It is not the "protocols" which jews don't want an open debate about, it is the Talmud.
As jews succeed in censoring links to other articles about the "protocols", other links pop up on the internet faster than they can count. Most of the following links are still active: