Ron Paul For President
100% of the people I know on the internet, support Ron Paul.
100%, not 99%, of the people I know personally support Ron Paul, unless they just haven’t heard of him—which is now down to only a few percent.
BEFORE the jews who run the media selected the three stooges (Obama, Hillary, and McCain [literally Son of CAIN]) as our “presidential candidates”, they were LUCKY to win 4%, and usually won only ONE PERCENT, of the popular vote as reflected by internet and media polls, while Ron Paul walked away with 50-93%.
This is NOT how the Constitution works. It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for alien enemy foreign jews to take control of our communications channels, establish themselves as the fourth branch of government, and take 100% control of the other three branches.
IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. The only legitimate, qualified, popular, constitutional candidate is Ron Paul, and by our LAW, he MUST be president. Nobody else can LEGALLY take that office.
We are a nation of law, not jews, not emotion, not sound bytes, not media hysteria, and not rule by alien enemy foreign agents. The following is our law and has been for 5,000 years:
When thou art come unto the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee, and shalt possess it, and shalt dwell therein, and shalt say, I will set a king over me, like as all the nations that are about me; Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose: one from among thy brethren shalt thou set king over thee: thou mayest not set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother. Deuteronomy 17:14-15
Some IDIOT on Hannity and Colmes on October 21, 2007, referred to Ron Paul as "certifiably insane", the ONLY reference on this MISERABLE "show" to Dr. Paul
Ron Paul takes off the gloves about jews pretending to be
Ron Paul takes off the gloves about jews pretending to be neo-conservatives!
You MUST see this video of Mark Larsen dressing DOWN Bitch Romney! A CLASSIC!!
When Ron Paul is EXCLUDED from a poll, as he was in three "mainstream media" polls like the WBZ poll, joos like Giuliani get 23% of the vote, pro-anti-abortion Romney gets 23%, and Manchurian candidate McCain gets 15%. BUT, when Ron Paul IS included, as he was in 14 other objective internet-based polls around the nation[where he received an average of 59% of the vote], the joo is lucky to get 8%, abortionist Romney is lucky to get 10%, and long lost Manchurian candidate McCain is lucky to get ONE PERCENT.
Let’s be candid here. The news media does NOT represent American public opinion on ANY issue, in ANY manner. Every mediot is marching to the beat of a drum which is the precise antonym to real American ideals particularly when it comes to the Constitutional principles supported by Dr. Paul.
Counting both Democrats and Republicans, Ron Paul gets 72% of vote, Jan. 5, 2007 in Colorado, hitlery and jooliani both get 4%:
Ron Paul wins 87% of the 2,745 votes on the CNN poll on the Florida debate
Who won the CNN Youtube Republican Debate in Florida?
You voted: Ron Paul
Not a single one of these CNN “strategists” understood a THING about politics, much less mainstream American opinion. Schneider and Begala thought Giuliani won the debate but only 11% of their *own* audience agreed with them. By what process have they been SO MISLED about reality? How can a tv set make them this STUPID? Holmes was even worse off, picking McCain when 6 TIMES as many out of her own audience picked Ron Paul.
They couldn’t even pick the best one-liners correctly. Begala struck out twice, picking two candidates who combined ranked almost lower than Ron Paul, Schneider picked McCain who less than 9% agreed with, and Begala picked Tancredo who, while he performed better in this category than McCain, received a quarter as many votes as Ron Paul.
Can it get worse? Yup. NONE of these “strategists” picked Giuliani as showing the worst performance, while a third of their audience DID. In such an important category, Schneider just horsed around by picking Bush who wasn’t even in the debate, Begala picked Thompson who only 10% agreed with, and Holmes picked Romney who only 17% agreed with.
If you set out to intentionally select answers which would be just the opposite of the actual answers, could you do worse than these “strategists”? It’s hard to imagine how, isn’t it? Instead of horsing around, Schneider could have decided that the worse performance came from Duncan Hunter or Jim Gilmore or Mike Huckabee, as each of them received less than 2%. They all three could have voted that the winner of the debate was either Tommy Thompson or Jim Gilmore, as a statistical zero percent selected them in this category. But as an overall resounding antonym to public opinion, their choices were perfect.
Poll Shows Obama & Edwards Rallying in NH
With the New Hampshire presidential primaries just six weeks away, Hillary Clinton’s lead over Barack Obama and John Edwards is shrinking, while Republican front-runner Mitt Romney appears secure, according to a 7NEWS-Suffolk University poll.
voters in the Democratic Primary, which includes independents, gave 34 percent
support to Hillary Clinton, while 22 percent chose Barack Obama. Just 12
percent were undecided. However, in a June 2007 7NEWS/Suffolk University
poll, Clinton led Obama by 18 points compared to her 12-point spread today.
Mitt Romney (34 percent) topped Rudy Giuliani (20 percent), followed by John McCain (13 percent), Ron Paul (8 percent), and Mike Huckabee (7 percent), with 14 percent undecided.
In the June 2007 7NEWS/Suffolk University poll, Romney had led Giuliani by four points, as opposed to fourteen points today. In the meantime, Fred Thompson, who polled 13 percent support in June, only garnered 2 percent in this poll.
“The dynamics are different on the Republican side,” said Paleologos. “Romney’s up; Giuliani’s down; McCain’s flat; Thompson is toast; and Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee are trying to break into double digits.”
Another sign of Romney’s strength: When likely Republican voters were asked which Presidential candidate they would trust to drive their children to school, 25 percent picked Romney; 17 percent chose McCain; 9 percent, Huckabee; and only 7 percent indicated Giuliani.
Choices not set in stone
Nearly half of likely voters from both parties said that they may change their minds before Jan. 8, 2008. Eleven percent were “very likely to change their mind,” and 38 percent were “somewhat likely.”
The poll also reveals some similarities among New Hampshire voters of both parties, such as:
About the poll
The 7NEWS-Suffolk University poll was conducted from Nov. 25
to Nov. 27, 2007. The margin of error is for each party subsample of 300
respondents is +/- 5.65 percent at a 95 percent level of confidence. The
600 respondent margin of error is +/- 4.00 percent. All respondents were
likely primary voters in the New Hampshire presidential primary on Jan. 8,
2008. Marginals and 455 pages of cross-tabulation data are
available. For more information, please contact David Paleologos,
director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center, at 781-290-9310.
We MUST ask, and we MUST GET ANSWERS, about how they are an order of magnitude off on the Ron Paul figure [an average of 59% for Ron Paul on the above polls, vs. only 5%]!!
It’s not internet-based polls which are wrong, or which don’t reflect American public opinion accurately—it’s the jew-controlled “media”polls which are!