German WWII Vet Reviews 'Saving Private Ryan'
Editor's Note: I am proud to call Hans Schmidt, the author of the following, my friend. I
have had the privilege and honor to know several German WWII veterans personally, from
Wehrmacht privates to Major-General Otto Ernst Remer, and I found each of them to be fine
men and great human beings.
In the annals of modern history, I do not believe there are military veterans who have had
to face the ordeal of vilification and falsification which these German veterans have
endured. They are hated and reviled in spite of the fact that they generally fought
cleanly and honorably in a war that can hardly be said to have been of their choosing.
Having met these men in the flesh, my intellectual convictions about the horrors of the
fratricide that was World War Two were confirmed emotionally and personally. To regard
these blood brothers of Americans as the enemy was the real "war crime."
Spielberg's "Pvt. Ryan" is about saving a surviving brother from the fate which
befell his other siblings in the American army. But concern only for the life of the
brother in American uniform is fatally short-sighted. Saving Private Fritz was just as
necessary. To think otherwise is to engage in deadly self-hate masked by the slick
celluloid of Spielberg.
It is this hatred for the image of the German stranger, who is in fact not a stranger, but
the face in our own mirror, that is at the root of the rot we observe today in France,
Britain and America. Where now is the civilization the Allied soldiers died to preserve?
Contrary to Spielberg's suggestion that Western, Christian civilization was saved in WWII
by the killing of Germans, the opposite obtained. One cannot make so colossal a blunder as
to mistake one's own brother for the enemy and compound that tragedy a million times and
expect the restoration of anything.
I now present to you the only reaction I have thus far seen to "Saving Private
Ryan" from one of those brothers our American countrymen sought to destroy. --Michael
A. Hoffman II
Mr. Steven Spielberg
10 Universal City Plaza
N. Hollywood, Calif. 91609
Dear Mr. Spielberg:
Permit me, a twice wounded veteran of the Waffen-SS, and participant in three campaigns
(Battle of the Bulge, Hungary and Austria) to comment on your picture, "Saving
Having read many of the accolades of this undoubtedly successful and, shall we say,
"impressive," film, I hope you don't mind some criticism from both a German and
a German-American point of view.
Apart from the carnage immediately at the beginning of the story, during the invasion at
Omaha Beach, whereon I cannot comment because I was not there; many of the battle scenes
You made some commendable efforts to provide authenticity through the use of several
pieces of original-looking German equipment, for instance, the Schï¿½tzenpanzerwagen (SPW),
the MG 42s, and the Kettenkrad.
And, while the appearance of German infantry soldiers of the regular Army in the Normandy
bunkers was not well depicted, the Waffen SS in the street fighting at the end of the film
were quite properly outfitted.
My comment about the unreality of the battle scenes has to do with the fact that the
Waffen-SS would not have acted as you depicted them in "Private Ryan."
While it was a common sight in battle to see both American and Russian infantry congregate
around their tanks when approaching our lines, this rarely if ever occurred with the
(The first Americans I saw during the Battle of the Bulge were about a dozen dead GIs
bunched around a burned-out, self-propelled, tracked howitzer.)
Furthermore, almost all the German soldiers seen in "Private Ryan" had their
heads shaved, or wore closely cropped hair, something totally in conflict with reality.
Perhaps you were confusing, in your mind, German soldiers with Russians of the time.
Or else, your Jewishness came to the fore, and you wanted to draw a direct line back from
today's skinheads to the Waffen-SS and other German soldiers of the Third Reich.
Also, for my unit you should have used 18 or 19-year old boys instead of older guys. The
average age, including general officers of the heroic Hitlerjugend division at Caen, was
The scene where the GI shows his Jewish "Star of David" medallion to German POWs
and tells them: "Ich Jude, ich Jude!" is so outrageous as to be funny.
I can tell you what German soldiers would have said to each other if such an incident had
actually ever occurred: "That guy is nuts!"
You don't seem to know that for the average German soldier of World War II, of whatever
unit, the race, color or "religion" of the enemy didn't matter at all. He didn't
know and he didn't care.
Furthermore, you committed a serious error in judgment when, in the opening scenes of
"Private Ryan" you had the camera pan from the lone grave with the Jewish star
to all the Christian crosses in the cemetery.
I know what you wanted to say but I am sure that I was not the only one who immediately
thereafter glanced over all the other hundreds of crosses one could see, to discover
whether somewhere else was another Star of David.
And you know the answer. In fact, you generated exactly the opposite effect of what you
had intended. Your use of that scene makes a lie out of the claim now put forth by Jewish
organizations that during World War II Jews volunteered for service in numbers greater
than their percentage of the general population, and that their blood sacrifice was
(therefore) higher also.
I visited the large Luxembourg military cemetery where General Patton is buried and
counted the Jewish stars on the gravestones. I was shocked by their absence.
After World War I, some German Jewish leaders mounted the same ruse: They claimed then and
still do to this day that, "12,000 Jews gave their lives for the Fatherland,"
which would also have made their general participation higher, which it was not. But
perhaps the "12,000" figure is intended as a symbol denoting, "from our
point of view, we did enough."
During World War II, as now, about a quarter of the American population considered itself
German-American. Knowing the patriotic fervor German-Americans harbor for America, we can
be certain that their numbers in the Armed Forces were equal or higher than their
percentage of the population.
Yet in "Saving Private Ryan" there was not one single German name to be heard or
seen among the Americans.
Did you forget Nimitz, Arnold, Spaatz or even Eisenhower? Well, perhaps Capt. Miller from
Pennsylvania was a German whose name had been anglicized. In omitting the American Germans
you seem to have taken a cue from the White House at whose contemporary state dinners
rarely someone with a German name can be found.
Well, maybe someone thinks that the abundance of German sounding names such as Goldberg,
Rosenthal, Silverstein and Spielberg satisfies the need for "German-American"
My final comment concerns the depictions of the shooting of German POWs immediately after
a fire fight. A perusal of American World War II literature indicates that such incidents
were much more common than is generally admitted, and more often than not, such
transgressions against the laws of war and chivalry are often or usually excused,
"because the GIs got mad at the Germans who had just killed one of their dearest
In other words, the anger and the war crime following it was both understandable and, ipso
facto excusable. In "Private Ryan" you seem to agree with this stance since you
permit only one of the soldiers, namely, the acknowledged coward, to say that one does not
shoot enemy soldiers who had put down their arms.
As a former German soldier I can assure you that among us we did not have this, what I
would call, un-Aryan mindset.
I remember well, when in January of 1945 we sat together with ten captured Americans after
a fierce battle, and the GIs were genuinely surprised that we treated them almost as
buddies, without rancor.
If you want to know why, I can tell you. We had not suffered from years of anti-enemy hate
propaganda, as was the case with American and British soldiers whose basic sense of
chivalry had often (but not always) been dulled by watching too many anti-German war
movies usually made by your brethren.
(For your information: I never saw even one anti-American war movie-- there were no more
Jewish directors at the UFA studios.)
P.O. Box 11124
Pensacola, Florida 32524-1124
Hans Schmidt is chairman of the German-American National Public Affairs Committee (GANPAC)
and publisher of the monthly "GANPAC Brief" ($50/yr. [$35 for students and
pensioners] $60 overseas). In 1995 he was arrested in Germany and imprisoned for six
months at Bï¿½tzow prison in Mecklenburg, for the "crime" of having mailed his
newsletters to Germany.
The 71 year old Schmidt remains unbowed and continues to address American audiences and
write his memoirs. His 490 page paperback book, "Jailed in Democratic Germany"
is available from him for $25.00 postpaid.
Links: Saving Public Myth: Hoffman reviews "Pvt. Ryan"
world war two revisionism / archives / bookstore / news bureau / home
The Campaign for Radical Truth in History
Copyright 1998 by Michael A. Hoffman II