Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

xmas3.gif (5351 bytes)

 

 

 

6,800 Cases of Infanticide per Year Are Mis-reported As SIDS

The Humboldt County Grand Jury Report Uncovers the Facts About SIDS

 

bulletOther motherhood statistics.
bulletVaccine deaths are mis-reported as SIDS.

horizontal rule

Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 19:46:59 -0700

From: Walter Schneider <sheep_@telusplanet.net>

Organization: SCNEIDER’S SHEEP

For good measure, I would like to throw in another item of information. Based on the findings shown in the Grand Jury Report for Humboldt County in California, of figures pertaining to infanticide being falsely reported as SIDS (a rate of 50% in all of the SIDS cases in Humboldt County—at a rate of 3.4 cases of SIDS reported per 1000 live births) and extrapolating from that and using the average SIDS rate for California of about 1.7 cases of SIDS per 1000 live births, it may be that about 3,100 child murders every year are being falsely reported as SIDS cases in the US. Extrapolating from that to Canada, that would mean that as many as about 400 cases of child murder occur in Canada every year that are currently being reported as SIDS. That would be about ten times the number currently reported for infanticide. Now why does Mr. John Finlay not sink his teeth into that one? Would he dare? Will anyone dare? Think of it this way: the most popular weapon in the murder of our children is a pillow or a mother’s breast used to smother a child! (How does anyone register those weapons?) Will Mr. John Finlay call for life sentences for that as well?

It sure would be interesting to know how Mr. Finlay rationalizes that the murder of a child can possibly be deemed far less important than sexual molestation. The opinions he offered in his speech are insufficient explanation for singling out one specific type of crime for special consideration and not others just as or even more vile and atrocious. Consider the case of Danielle Blais who didn’t serve a single day of her sentence of two years less than a day for the deliberate drowning in the murder of her two-year old son.

horizontal rule

OCTOBER 22, 23:51 ET
Police: Woman Admits Killing Babies

DYERSBURG, Tenn. (AP) - Authorities say a Tennessee woman has admitted killing her two infant daughters in the early 1980s, deaths that at the time were attributed to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.

Maxine Watson, 37, of Dyersburg, is charged with one count of second-degree murder in the death of her 5-month-old daughter, who died in 1982. Watson could face additional charges in the death of her 8-month-old daughter, who died in 1984. Both infants died in Milwaukee.

Dyersburg Police Lt. Steve Isbell said Watson came to the police department Friday at the urging of a counselor. Watson told police she had been hallucinating in recent weeks, hearing sounds of a crying baby and children's voices.

In each case, Watson had told police and child welfare officials she awoke to find the infant not breathing in her crib. Isbell said Watson admitted Friday that she smothered the children with a pillow.

Watson has an 11-year-old son who has been living with relatives since her arrest.

She has been extradited to Wisconsin to face charges.

horizontal rule

Tim,

The following is a condensed version of the attached document.

There is considerable bias in the excerpt of the discussion that you had sent. I would not be surprised that if any evidence supporting the bias that was produced in the discussion was biased as well. We can’t have an honest solution to the problem unless we find honest results and evidence of abuse of all children who are being abused in relation to the type of their perpetrators.

I have a feeling that a far larger proportion of sexual abuse of children is perpetrated by mothers than is being perpetrated by homosexuals. Why introduce a bill in the wake of an adverse wave of publicity against homosexuals? It seems to me that we have far more important fish to fry.

That is not a popular view, but it is born out by the meager evidence produced in

Frederick Matthews’ report "The Invisible Boy"

at http://www.travel-net.com/~pater/invis.htm

The following is from that report (chapter 2) at

http://www.travel-net.com/~pater/invis-3.htm

===<quote>===

[The full quotes are shown in the attachment. The following are the topics covered in the quotes:]

Female Perpetrators

Dynamics of Female Perpetrated Abuse

===<end quote>===

The most compelling evidence is contained in the table that follows the preceding

paragraphs on the same page

===<>===

Table 4. Victim Gender Based on Who Previously Abused the Perpetrator

Gender of Perpetrators’ Gender of Victim

Own Victimizer Male or Both Female Only

Male only 67.5% 32,5%

Female only 6.7% 93,3%

Berkowitz (1993), in a Winnipeg based study of sexually abused males in

treatment groups, found the

following rates of perpetration.

Table 5. Gender of Abusers of Male Victims in Treatment Groups

Gender of Abusers

N % Intrafamilial Abuse (N=54)

Male perpetrated 54 100.0 %

Female perpetrated 39 72.2 %

Extrafamilial Abuse (N=55)

Male adult 50 90.9 %

Female adult 30 54.5 %

Male adolescent 39 70.9 %

Female adolescent 24 43.6 %

===<end quote>===

[check attachment for text of this paragraph]

Let’s look at the statistics of physical abuse and neglect that Frederick Matthews presents in his next paragraph (I arranged some of the data into a table and added the column with the figures on relative odds).

Physical Abuse and Neglect

>From the Ontario Incidence Study (investigations of child maltreatment)

[Child Abuse and Neglect in Ontario: Incidence and Characteristics

Nico Trocomé, Debra McPhee, and Kwok Kwan Tam

This article presents descriptive findings from the Ontario

Incidence Study of Reported Child Abuse

and Neglect (OIS). OIS is the first Canadian study to examine the

incidence and characteristics of

reported maltreatment. The study is based on a survey form

completed by child protection workers on

a representative sample of 2,447 investigated children. OIS found

an incidence rate of reported

maltreatment of 21 per thousand children, and a 27% substantiation

rate. These rates are compared to

those in the United States. (abstract from http://infoweb.magi.com/~crccy/docs/newab.html)]

the following information was excerpted and quoted by Frederick Matthews:

physical abuse 41%

sexual abuse 24%

neglect 30%

emotional maltreatment 10%

other forms of maltreatment 2%

two or more forms of suspected maltreatment in 12%

substantiated maltreatment 27%

suspected maltreatment 30%

unsubstantiated maltreatment 42%

Note: The following statistics do not specify rates of abuse. They do specify the rates of children alleged to have been abused. Although from the preceding table it is apparent that 27% of allegations were substantiated, it is not possible to tell from the data presented by Frederick Matthews what the substantiation rate for each individual category in the following tables was.

Gender of investigated children male female

All maltreatment investigations 49% 51%

Sexual abuse investigations 35% 65%

Parental caretakers of investigated children % of all families[1}

Relative Odds[3]

Both biological parents 34%

78.7 1

Biological parent and a step parent 19% 4.3

32.8

Single mother 36%

14.6 5.1

Single father 6% 1.1

405.4[2]

Notes: 1) Based on national distribution of children aged 0 to 11 year per

family type 1994-1995.

[Growing up in Canada, StatCan and Human Resources Canada, page 29]

2) If a very small number of fathers was identified that would be expected.

The size of the sample of children about which report were made (2,447 in all)

does not permit to draw conclusions about how many fathers were

involved,

although it does permit to calculate that 27 reports of abuse of a child

by a single father were investigated, but then it may be that none of

those

reports were substantiated.

3) The likelihood of that happening to a child compared to children in the

care

of both biological parents.

Primary source of income for % of all families[1} Relative Odds[2]

investigated children’s family

Social Assistance 38% 11.4 14.7

Other 72% 88.6 1

Notes: 1) Based on Ontario distribution of children aged 0 to 11 year by

main source of income 1994-1995.

[Growing up in Canada, StatCan and Human Resources Canada, page 35]

2) A child in a family on social assistance is 14.7 times more likely

to

be investigated on account of abuse allegations than a child in a family

that is not on social assistance.

Type of housing in which investigated children resided

Subsidized housing 17%

Other 83%

[Check attachment for text of these paragraphs]

Although Frederick Matthews explains why and that men cause greater physical injuries to children and that they do so more often, Bureau of Justice Statistics child-murder data from the US do indicate that biological mothers are the perpetrators of child murder in 55% of the cases and biological fathers are the perpetrators in 6% of the cases (with the second most frequent murderers of children being the biological mothers’ boyfriends).

Frederick Matthews makes a very impassioned plea that additional research is required to determine the degree to which boys are being subjected to all types of abuse, but he does indicate that there are very good reasons to assume that the abuse of boys, including sexual abuse by women is far underreported and gives many reasons to substantiate that.

Much of our legislation is being introduced based on waves of popularity for a specific issue that gained public attention. In the case of Bill C-245 it is the sexual abuse of boys by homosexuals. However, that would encompass only a small fraction of the sexual abuse of boys. We will not have equitable justice in relation to any type of abuse of boys or children if we insist to govern by popular opinions promulgated in the media. What is required is to make an objective analysis of any situation before we engage on the introduction of any legislation. Regardless of the current attempts to formulate such bills into gender-neutral language, it will be the popular opinion or, more correctly, "politically correct" perceptions that will govern the application of any law.

There is no objectivity in our justice system. Contrary to the ostensible claims, Justice is not blind. Furthermore, Justice is a lady with an awful weapon.

All the best,

Walter H. Schneider

Bruderheim, Alberta

PS. For good measure, I would like to throw in another item of information. Based on the findings shown in the Grand Jury Report for Humboldt County in California, of figures pertaining to infanticide being falsely reported as SIDS (a rate of 50% in all of the SIDS cases in Humboldt County—at a rate of 3.4 cases of SIDS reported per 1000 live births) and extrapolating from that and using the average SIDS rate for California of about 1.7 cases of SIDS per 1000 live births, it may be that about 3,100 child murders every year are being falsely reported as SIDS cases in the US. Extrapolating from that to Canada, that would mean that as many as about 400 cases of child murder occur in Canada every year that are currently being reported as SIDS. That would be about ten times the number currently reported for infanticide. Now why does Mr. John Finlay not sink his teeth into that one? Would he dare? Will anyone dare? Think of it this way: the most popular weapon in the murder of our children is a pillow or a mother’s breast used to smother a child! (How does anyone register those weapons?) Will Mr. John Finlay call for life sentences for that as well?

It sure would be interesting to know how Mr. Finlay rationalizes that the murder of a child can possibly be deemed far less important than sexual molestation. The opinions he offered in his speech are insufficient explanation for singling out one specific type of crime for special consideration and not others just as or even more vile and atrocious. Consider the case of Danielle Blais who didn’t serve a single day of her sentence of two years less than a day for the deliberate drowning in the murder of her two-year old son.

horizontal rule

Update, Dec. 15, 2002:  there are 4 million live births per year in the US, so if 1.7 SIDS deaths per 1000 live births are actually infanticide, then 6,800 SIDS deaths are actually murders committed by mothers.

In addition, an unknown but significant portion of the other 6,800 SIDS deaths were actually due to adverse reactions to vaccines, which are deaths which aren't reported to the federal health authorities, as required.

 

 

image001.jpg (18682 bytes)  

Ogam

giuliani.jpg (24193 bytes)

EXECUTE
 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party