Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

Solution

Eliminating Discrimination Against Men

FATHERS' MANIFESTO Home Page

"In the colonial past when the right to vote was linked to property, some women enjoyed the franchise. The right, as applied to women, had been revoked in New York in 1777. The spread of Jacksonian democracy beginning in the 1820s had meant universal white male suffrage, without regard to property or other qualification, but sensitive, intelligent, and publicly concerned women were still deprived of it."

"The Ten Original Amendments: The Bill of Rights, was passed by Congress September 25, 1789."

Thus the US Constitution and the original amendments presumed that a man was the head of the family, was the sole voter and decision maker, and was solely responsible for all family matters. There would be no thought for the next century and a half that the language of this historic document would be applied to women.

"The suffrage amendment was reintroduced by Jeannette Rankin of Montana on January 20, 1918. She herself was from the first region to grant the vote to women and was the first woman to be elected to Congress. The amendment passed amidst the cheers of women who sat knitting in the galleries. Other women gathered on the steps of Capitol were described by the New York Times as "cheering like collegians after a football victory." The vote was indeed close, only one more than the required two-thirds. One congressman left the deathbed of his suffragist wife to cast his vote and then returned to her funeral. Two congressmen came from hospitals to cast affirmative votes. Tennessee was the thirty-sixth state to ratify the amendment. On August 26, 1920, final passage was achieved. Times had changed."

"AMENDMENT XIX Passed by Congress June 4, 1919. Ratified August 18, 1920. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex."

No attempt, however, was made to correct the language of the Constitution to take into account the mental, physical, moral, and emotional differences between the genders. Consider for example that the amendment referring to "equal protection" of the laws was written more than half a century before women had the right to vote or were even considered for "equal protection".

"AMENDMENT XIV Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868 nor to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

The 143 years during which women did not have the right to vote marked a stable period of American History during which social pathology was absent, divorce was rare, illegitimacy was almost non-existent, economic growth was unprecedented, and innovation ruled. In the 75 years since women were given the right to vote, chronic declining family stability, increasing divorce rates, increasing illegitimacy, increasing crime, and increasing incarceration rates, which accelerated at an unprecedented rate beginning in the 1950s, have been the byword. But this gradually increasing social pathology did not seriously impact the momentum of the previous 2 centuries of rapid economic growth for almost half a century, in the mid-1960s, when the Dow Jones Industrial Average reached its all- time after-inflation high. At that point the US was the undisputed world leader in standard of living and per capita income. So why the feminist complaints that American women were "discriminated against"? In a reckless and vigorous attempt to accommodate that complaint we ignored and abridged the clear language of the Constitution.

This mistake shall be corrected. The original language of the US Constitution shall be adhered to. The protections, immunities, privileges, and rights of those to whom the Constitution originally applied shall hereby be asserted without further prevarication.

"AMENDMENT XIII Congress January 31, 1865. Ratified December 6, 1865. Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

What IS "involuntary servitude" if it is not forcing someone to work against their will for someone else? Removing children from fathers as a matter of government policy; doling them back to fathers in exchange for tremendous psychological, time consuming, financial, legal costs; ignoring the state of fatherlessness this creates; forcing fathers to pay "child support" to an ex-wife who provides no physical or emotional or other support and who often provides exactly the opposite; tracking them across state lines; removing their drivers' licenses, their business licenses, and often their credit rating and their ability to conduct business or hold a job; is involuntary servitude, is unconstitutional, and shall end.

"AMENDMENT XIV Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868 Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States;"

"NCJ 143498- Murder in Families - 12pp, 7/94, 14 tables This BJS Special Report, a survey of murder cases disposed in 1988. Women were over half of the defendants (55%) in ... family murder: parents killing their offspring."

Taking a man's children, home, current and future income, savings, car, self respect, drivers' license, business licenses, and ability to earn a living is an abridgement of his privileges or immunities, particularly if he has not committed a crime, and when the parent most likely to murder their children is the mother. The vast majority of fathers have not committed any crimes. This language provides a responsibility to the Supreme Court to assure that neither the states nor the federal government violates these privileges or immunities. Volumes of laws and regulations, millions of lawsuits, hundreds of billions of dollars in legal fees from the filing of millions of individual law suits have failed time and time again, across the entire face of the nation, to assert basic, clear cut Constitutional rights, and this shall end.

"nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,"

A man's family is precisely the "life, liberty, or property" referred to here. A man who does not commit a crime, has as his highest priority in his life the welfare of his children, is capable of raising them, has the financial resources prior to the state removing them in the name of divorce to provide shelter, food, care, and love for them, as well as his children, shall be assured that the State will not deprive "any person" of this basic Constitutional right to his life, liberty, or property.

Children of divorce shall also be provided their Constitutional right to life, liberty, or property by assuring that they remain in the household with the optimum psychological, moral, spiritual, financial, and educational environment.

"without due process of law;"

"Due process of law" prohibits this destruction of a father's family and life, and it is for good reason in the face of the overwhelming evidence that the court itself is the catalyst which created the problems of divorce and illegitimacy, which led to our 40% rate of fatherlessness, which created our social pathology.

"nor to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Application of this "equal protection of the laws" requires compensation for at least 3 decades of chronic and unconstitutional past discrimination against men. This requires federal programs and laws which provide a legal advantage to men for the next 3 decades which is comparable to that for women for the last 3 decades.

  1. UNEQUAL WELFARE SPENDING AND TAXATION Welfare is paid primarily to women, yet funded primarily by men. Men receive less than 7.5% of it, even though they pay 75% to 85% of the taxes which fund it. This is a direct and creative transfer of an estimated $234 Billion directly from men to women. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires that welfare expenditures be paid 92.5% to men and 7.5% to women, and that women pay 75% to 85% of the taxes which fund it.
  2. UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH The nation's wealth is held only 35% by men, while 65% is held by women. The massive government transfers of wealth like that above, as well as through other programs like "child support", AFDC, HUD housing, Social Security, and inheritance laws, discriminate against men by leaving them with only one third of the wealth of the nation, even though they earned 70-85% of it in the first place. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires economic incentives and programs which assure that 65% of wealth is held by men.
  3. UNEQUAL APPLICATION OF DIVORCE LAWS Divorce laws favoring mothers encourage them to file for divorce twice as often as fathers. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires federal programs and laws to reduce the number of divorces filed by women to half that of men.

    "In 1988 divorces filed involving families with children, 64.9% were filed by women, which is down from 71.4% filed by women in 1975; 28.8% were filed by men, which is up from 25.6% in 1975; and 6.3% were filed jointly, which is up from 2.6% in 1975." National Center for Health Statistics, Monthly Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 38, No. 12 (S) 2, May 21, 1991.

  4. UNEQUAL APPLICATION OF CHILD CUSTODY LAWS

    1) Marriage, divorce, illegitimacy, and child custody laws have been structured to allow removal of 92% of the children of divorce and illegitimacy from fathers and placed with their mothers. Those who file for the majority of the divorces which destroy American families shall no longer be provided "equal protection" to those who do not file and instead attempt to keep families together. Compensation for this unequal, unconstitutional application of the laws requires federal programs and laws which assure that 92% of the children of divorce and illegitimacy remain in the custody of fathers who:

    a) paid for their birth and upbringing
    b) have the resources and the ability to raise them
    c) desire to be the primary parent
    d) are capable of and desire to instill values in children
    e) can provide the healthiest, most financially secure environment
    f) rear the children who are the least likely to go to prison, have psychological problems, do poorly in school, etc.
  5. UNEQUAL EMPLOYMENT POLICY DISCRIMINATES AGAINST MEN BY DESIGN Government-sponsored affirmative action programs similar to the ones which discriminated against men by design for the last 2-3 decades shall be put into place to equally discriminate against women.
  6. UNEQUAL HEALTH CARE SPENDING The life expectancy for men is 7.2 years shorter than for women, yet health care spending favors women by a wide margin. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires federally sponsored men's health programs to increase men's life expectancy to 7.2 years longer than that for women.
  7. UNEQUAL MENTAL CARE SPENDING The suicide rate for men is five (5) times higher than for women, yet mental health care spending favors women by a wide margin. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires federally sponsored programs to reduce the suicide rate of men to 1/5th of that for women.
  8. UNEQUAL VICTIM ASSISTANCE SPENDING Murders of men are four times that of women, yet it is women who receive a much larger share of "victim assistance" funds. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires federal laws and programs which reduce the rate of victimization of men to one quarter of that for women.

    Bureau of Justice Statistics - 1994 murders: Men = 21,233, women = 5050, a rate 4.2x higher than for women.

  9. UNEQUAL APPLICATION OF "MUST ARREST" LAWS Domestic violence police policy, and "must arrest" laws, result in the father being arrested regardless of the facts of the situation or of who called the police. "Must arrest" policies in police agencies across the nation call for the police to arrest the man in any domestic violence call, regardless of the circumstances and regardless of who actually called the police. Even though men are the victims of crime 4 times more often than women, domestic violence programs deal only with women. These shall be modified to deal with men. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires a presumption to arrest the mother for the next 3 decades."
  10. UNEQUAL INCARCERATION RATES Prison incarceration rates of men for equivalent crimes are up to 5 times that of women, and men receive prison sentences which are 2 or more times longer for the exact same crime. For example, out of 92,490 accusations of rape in 1988, fully 51,431 of these charges were PROVEN to be false, while 15,562 men were imprisoned. A false charge of rape does far more damage than many of the alleged rapes themselves, yet not one single conviction for filing a false police report and/or perjury has been identified. Compensation for this unequal application of the laws requires federal programs to ensure that the estimated 50,000 women who file FALSE charges EVERY YEAR are punished as severely as those they falsely accuse.

    BUREAU OF JUSTICE STATISTICS FACT SHEET - ADVANCE FOR RELEASE AT 5 P.M. EDT - WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1995 - Moreover, convicted husbands were more likely to receive a term of imprisonment (94 percent of the husbands vs. 81 percent of the wives), and the average prison sentence for husbands was much longer--16 years for husbands vs. 6 years for wives.

FATHERS' MANIFESTO Home Page

 

 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party