Free news

FREE blog







Gun poll








14th Amdt

19th Amdt














No SSN Required


The following does not constitute a recommendation that the SSN be abandoned nor that taxes not be paid.  It is merely information regarding the possible unconstitutionality of  two very questionable government practices in this putative Christian nation


    Folks when people ask you for your Social Security
Number here is some information that you need to
know. There are few people that are intitled to that

    You can use this form to inform people that they
are not allowed to even ask you for your Social Security.
We suggest that you print this out and make several
copies of it and cary them with you to show those people
who ask for your Social Security Number.

    Hope this is of value and help to you folks.

    Notice of limitation on Social Security Number
use and demand for compliance with the laws
relating to requirements governing requests for
disclosure of such number.

    This document is to serve NOTICE to the
financial institution, its agents, employees and
representatives named herein, that the intent of
the Citizen named herein is to exercise his or her
lawful right, protected under the provisions of the
Federal Privacy Act (Title 5, United States Code,
Section 552(a)), which limits the disclosure of a
Federal Social Security Account Number.

    In 1974 Congress passed the Federal Privacy
Act (Public Law 93-579, 88 Stat. 1896; as
amended). The relevance of this Act is simply that
it highlights the importance of privacy interests
associated with social security information. Cf.
Wolman v. United States, 501 F.Supp. 310 (D.C.D.C.
1980), remanded 675 F.2d 1341 (D.C. Cir. 1982),
vacated on other grounds, 542 F.Supp. 84 (D.C.D.C.
182) (Section 7 of the Privacy Act was intended,
the District Court found, to block indiscriminate
governmental use of social security information as
the "universal identifier."). See United States v. Two
Hundred Thousand Dollars in U.S. Currency, 590
F.Supp 866 (S.D. Fla. 1984).

    Section 7 of The Privacy Act makes it
unlawful for any person to require an
individual to disclose or furnish a social
security number for any purpose, unless the
disclosure or furnishing the number was
specifically required by federal law.

    In enacting Section 7, Congress sought to
curtail the expanding use of social security
numbers by federal and local agencies and, by so
doing, to eliminate the threat to individual privacy
and confidentiality of information posed by
common numerical identifiers. See S.Rep.No. 1183,
93rd Cong., 2nd. Sess., reprinted in [1974] U.S.
Code Cong. & Admin. News, pp. 6916, 6944.
Underlying this legislative effort was the
recognition that widespread use of a standard
identification number in collecting information
could lead to the establishment of a national data
bank or similar informational system, which could
store data gathered about individuals from many
sources and facilitate government surveillance of
its citizens. Id. at 6944-45, 6957. It was anticipated
that as the use of the social security number
proliferated, the incentive to consolidate records
and to broaden access to them by other agencies of
government would in all likelihood
correspondingly increase. Id. at 6945. Thus,
Congress saw a need for federal legislation to
restore to the individual the option to refuse to
disclose his social security number without
repercussion, except in specifically delineated
circumstances outlined in section 7(a)(2).

    The federal courts have ruled that private sector
solicitors may not obtain social security numbers
until they comport their solicitations to comply with
disclosure requirements of Privacy Act, including informing
customers of voluntariness of disclosure, source of
authority for it, and possible uses to which disclosed
numbers might be put. Yeager v. Hackensack Water Co., 615
F.Supp. 1087 (1985).

    Any person who is found in violation of Title 5,
United States Code, Section 552(a), for depriving any
Citizen of any right, benefit, or privilege provided by
law may be subject to "(A) actual damages sustained by
the individual as a result of the refusal or failure, but in

no case shall a person entitled to recovery receive
less than the sum of $1,000.00; and (B) the costs of the
action together with reasonable attorney fees as
determined by the court." See Doyle v. Wilson, 529
F.Supp. 1343 (1982).

    In addition, should it be found that the rights
deprived are, in fact, Constitutionally secured,
unalienable Rights, any person, who by act or
omission, or under color of Law, deprives the bearer
of this document of such secured Right, or Rights,
protected by the Constitution of the United States of
America, may be subject to Fine of up to $10,000.00,
and imprisonment for up to ten years, or both. See
Title 18, United States Code, Sections 241, 242; as well
as: Title 42, United States Code, Sections 1983, 1985 and
1986, providing for additional civil actions for damages.

    Since the passage of the Privacy Act, federal
regulations which carry the force and effect of law
have been promulgated by the Secretary of Treasury
prescribing the procedure used in obtaining taxpayer
identification numbers. Pursuant to Title 31, Code of
Federal Regulations, Section 103.34, banks are required
to ask for the social security number when opening a
bank account for a new customer, but in the event that
the bank has been unable to secure the required
information, "it shall nevertheless not be deemed to be
in violation of this section if (I) it has made a reasonable

effort to secure such identification, and (ii) it maintains
a list containing the names, addresses, and account
numbers of those persons from whom it has been unable
to secure such identification, and makes the names,
addresses, and account numbers of those persons available
to the Secretary as directed by him."

    Regulations issued by the Board of Governors of the
Reserve System, require all member banks to adhere to the
regulations promulgated under Title 31 and caution banks not

to adopt policies which conflict with and violate federal
law and regulations concerning privacy issues.

    Compliance with the Law and the bearer's intent, as
expressly evidenced and implied by this document, is
demanded. Non-
compliance with this NOTICE AND DEMAND shall result in
immediate action against the below named financial
and representative(s). Such action may include, but shall
not be
limited to, all theories of liability provided by laws and
cited in this document.

    Take Notice and Govern Yourselves Accordingly.

    I, ___________________________________, the undersigned,
hereby verify and certify, that on the _____ day of
___________________, 19___, I personally handed a copy of
document to ______________________________________,
whose title is: ___________________________________. It is
my desire
to open a checking account
with_____________________________________, whose address is




    Keep in mind the bank may claim it's their "policy" to
require all accounts have a social security number.
However policy is not law, policy follows the law. Remember
31 CFR section 103.34 is the controlling regulation.
If you need more information or help, let us know.



jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition


Hit Counter


Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party