From: "John Knight" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Newsgroups: alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-lim References: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0207070027570.27896-100000@mail> Subject: Time for KIKES show-and-tell Lines: 172 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <tjQV8.25568$Pemail@example.com> Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 05:27:53 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.108.40.206 X-Complaints-To: firstname.lastname@example.org X-Trace: news2.west.cox.net 1026019673 220.127.116.11 (Sun, 07 Jul 2002 01:27:53 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 01:27:53 EDT Organization: Cox Communications
> Tammy Bruce is a former president of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW > and a contributing editor to FrontPageMagazine.com. She is the author > of "The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free > Speech and Free Minds."
But FIRST, Tammy Bruce is a sodomite, a kike, criminally STUPID, a feminazi, and a LIAR, each one of which should be criminal acts in this putative Christian nation.
The REAL threat to the security of this nation is STUPID KIKES like her, not Muslims, 99.999999% of whom have never attacked nor even thought about attacking the World Trade Center.
"Howard Rothenburg" <email@example.com> wrote in message news:Pine.GSO.4.44.0207070027570.27896-100000@mail... > > Time for Muslim Show-and-Tell > > Tammy Bruce > Wednesday, July 3, 2002 > > Last time I checked, it was Muslims who attacked this country on > September 11, killing thousands of Americans. I predicted then to my > friends that we were about to descend into the equivalent of the > Looking Glass: There would be a frenzy by our cultural and political > establishment to cozy up to Muslims in this country in a perverse > effort to 'prove' we still love them; to prove we aren't racist; to > prove we aren't anti-Muslim. > > Somehow the pathetic proving would rest with the victims as we swim in > false guilt and political correctness inflicted on us by the Left > Elite for decades. The same mentality that compelled the American > establishment to beg Muslims to like us in the aftermath of slaughter > brought to us by their 'brothers' is also responsible for our > inability to stop it as the conspiracy grew. > > Can you imagine an effort by law enforcement before September 11 to > question Arabs or Muslims in this country? It was impossible. And it > remains impossible even after the attack. Our hands were tied then as > they are now, by a Left Elite rhetoric that has reduced our critical > minds to mush, and twisted our legal right to defend ourselves into > the bizarre effort at group therapy to make sure those who hate us > know that we don't hate them. > > Since the attacks on our country, we have indeed been kissing the > proverbial derriere of the American Muslim establishment, and it's > time we stopped. It is now their turn to do the right thing and go out > of their way to show us that they are American first and foremost. > > FBI Director Robert S. Mueller's little lunch talk to the American > Muslim Council (AMC) on June 28 is the latest and most inappropriate > manifestation of the scourge of political correctness. One of > Mueller's aides, in responding to criticism regarding his appearance, > claimed he was speaking to them because they are "the most mainstream > Muslim group in the United States." Well, that's a worry. > > AMC's support for terrorist fund raising, hostility to law enforcement > and hostility to the United States is widely documented. (See, for > example, 'Mainstream' Muslims? by Daniel Pipes.) If this is the > mainstream Muslim, we're all in trouble. > > Instead of delivering a speech, Director Mueller had a duty to deliver > subpoenas to that organization, scour its books and deport any of its > directors and members who are here illegally. Instead, our Left Wing > culture of paralyzing self-hate, still disgustingly drilled into us > post-Sept. 11 by pond scum like Susan Sontag and Noam Chomsky, has > compelled the FBI to have salad with them instead. > > In these months after the worst attack on American soil by an enemy, I > checked the Web site for CAIR the Council on American-Islamic > Relations (http://www.cair-net.org). Perhaps I was wrong, I thought. > Perhaps Muslims in this country are reaching out and it just isn't > being covered. > > What I found instead were screeds against Jews, from articles like > their front-page headline: "Pro-Israel lobby buys Alabama house seat > say Muslims" to news releases demanding we kiss their derrieres even > more, with "Bush's speech 'fell short' say Muslims" and "President > Bush asked to repudiate anti-Muslim remarks." > > At a time when the Muslim establishment in this country should be > tripping over themselves to prove they're with us and are loyal and > sympathetic (after all, isn't that what we've been doing for them?), > they instead spew rhetoric that runs the gamut from concern about > themselves to concern about themselves. > > I recall that some weeks after the attack Queen Noor of Jordan, the > American girl born Lisa Halaby who married the now-late King Hussein, > appeared on "Larry King Live." Queen Noor converted to Islam when she > married Hussein and was asked by Larry something to the effect of what > is it that Americans can do to show Muslims around the world that > we're not bad people? > > The appropriate question to her would have been how can you convince > us that Muslims aren't bad people? After all, it was a reasonable > question after September 11, and it oddly remains the question as we > continue to give the Muslim establishment a free pass in our efforts > to prove we aren't racist. > > It's time we get off our knees and make it clear to the > American-Muslim establishment that we have a few requirements of our > own, and that it's time they put up as American-first or shut up, and > perhaps even get out if they haven't bothered to renew their visas. > > First, they can prove they are American-first by exhibiting some > patience when it comes to our efforts to protect ourselves in this war > on Radical Islamists. > > There is a terrorist profile and if you fit it, you have a duty as an > American to understand; stop attacking Jews. There is only one group > of people on Earth right now waging a jihad on people because of > religion and it's not the Jews, it's Radical Islamists; support law > enforcement in this country, rhetorically and otherwise. > > Instead of making television appearances whining about 'anti-Muslim > bias' try spending that time raising money for the victims of 9-11 and > reaching out through media, repeating as often as possible your > rejection of Islamist terror groups and Radical Islamists in general. > > Will we see this from groups like CAIR and AMC? I doubt it. From what > I've seen, the fat-cat Muslim Elite in this country are indeed loyal > just not to the United States. Unfortunately, I believe it will take > another attack before the impact of decades of the Left's paralyzing > political correctness can be erased and we can actually get down to > the business of saving this country and our future. > > Tammy Bruce is a former president of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW > and a contributing editor to FrontPageMagazine.com. She is the author > of "The New Thought Police: Inside the Left's Assault on Free > Speech and Free Minds." > > E-mail Tammy Bruce at firstname.lastname@example.org.
From: "radical" <email@example.com> Subject: ???: Another reason to hate this stupid KIKE... Date: 1999/07/06 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org>#1/1 References: <email@example.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Complaints-To: firstname.lastname@example.org X-Trace: news.netvision.net.il 931219312 29339 18.104.22.168 (6 Jul 1999 00:01:52 GMT) Organization: NetVision Israel X-MSMail-Priority: Normal NNTP-Posting-Date: 6 Jul 1999 00:01:52 GMT Newsgroups: alt.telaviv
John <email@example.com> ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½ï¿½:firstname.lastname@example.org... > > [ Article reposted from soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.politics.equality,alt.support.cross posting,alt.flame.fucking.faggots,alt.callahans,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh ] > [ Author was Fred Cherry ] > [ Posted on Sat, 03 Jul 1999 12:47:21 GMT ] > > "Kathy Common" <email@example.com> writes: > > >eat me, cherry! > > > Another homosexual Nazi is heard from. This one is a pre-op transsexual. > > > firstname.lastname@example.org (Fred Cherry) > > Grand Duke of Yugoslobia > Duke of Vulgaria > Grand Muff-Diver of Jerusalem > & Elector of Homophobia > stupid gay lamer natzi
From: Supermann <email@example.com> Subject: Re: Another reason to hate this stupid KIKE... Date: 1999/07/05 Message-ID: <378131F3.D3F5A17@earthlink.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <377FCC73.1931B1AD@mail.hal-pc.org> <ngQf3.158$0D3.email@example.com> <377FFDF6.7E40040@mail.hal-pc.org> <FEE9v0.BxF@world.std.com> X-Accept-Language: en X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" X-ELN-Date: 5 Jul 1999 21:32:18 GMT X-ELN-Insert-Date: Mon Jul 5 14:35:13 1999 Organization: young homos for jesus Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Newsgroups: houston.general,alt.politics.homosexuality,soc.motss,soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,alt.callahans,alt.flame.fucking.faggots
An Orthodox Rabbi speaks out on pedophilia
Fred Cherry wrote:
> Che'Gu Maru <email@example.com> writes: > > >Got me. Good question, however. I just attack bigotry whenever and > >where ever I happen to step in it.
> >Lithium wrote:
> >> When the hell did this thread start? > >> > >> Che'Gu Maru wrote in message <377FCC73.1931B1AD@mail.hal-pc.org>... > >> >Roses are reddish > >> >Violets are bluish > >> >Do you feel inferior > >> >'Cause you weren't born Jewish? > >> > > >> >John wrote: > >> > > >> >> sieg heil, juden schwein! > >> >> > >> > > > This thread started in the newsgroup: alt.flame.fucking.faggots. The > reason it started is this: I had responded to an article by "Tebster." > "Tebster" is the official spokesman for NAMBLA on Usenet. NAMBLA is the > acronym for the North American Man/Boy Love Association, the largest and > most powerful organization of child-molesters in the world. "Tebster" had > posted his usual boiler-plate message glorifying and exalting homosexual > child-molesting. I then responded with a message which incorporated the > following: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > The members of NAMBLA have all sorts of mind games and tricks that they use > to seduce young boys into homosexual activity. Here is some information > about NAMBLA. > > There was an article in THE JERSEY JOURNAL (Newsstand Edition), dated > 6/11/82, pages 1 and 29, describing their modus operandi. The story says > that members of NAMBLA went to local fast food stores and "cased" the > stores for potential victims. It goes on to say that: "None of the victims, > it was stressed by authorities, had any previous homosexual experience." > The article then goes on to say that the victims were boys ranging in age > from eight to fourteen and that they were all poor white boys with no > father in the home. Then the NAMBLA members went to the boys' homes and > convinced the boys' mothers that the NAMBLA members were a "big brother" > charitable organization and wanted to serve as surrogate fathers. They > first took the boys on fishing and camping trips and to movies. THEN after > softening up the boys in this manner, they brainwashed the boys into > engaging in homosexual activity. > > In addition, NAMBLA is an organization which has a pathological hatred of > women. I say this on the basis of one of the items of literature that they > used to recommend. They used to hand out literature at the anual New York > City "Gay Pride" parade which included the book: THE ASBESTOS DIARY, as one > of the books on their recommended reading list. I will quote from a review > of this book which appeared in the homosexual magazine TANGENTS, dated > 5/66: > > Consider, for example, the kind deed done to humanity by > the author ("Duke" to his friends) in the matter of the old > whore. After one of his old *inamorati* has been sent to the > hospital with "the two worse of the seven sociable diseases, > plus stricture and involvement of the prostate and bladder-- > and potent penicillin which killed Mark....," Duke goes to > the boy's funeral and later, after having purchased two > small household items at Polter & Geist's Department Store, > visits the old whatever: "...I threw a sawbuck in her lap > saying it was hers in any case but to tell me the truth: Is > she free from disease? 'I'm clean as your mother, dearie!' > she lisped, sealing her doom, and soiling my gloved fist on > *impasto* complexion I clipped her on the jaw, lowered her > unconscious form to the bed and ripped off her clothes. Then > I unwrapped my purchases: a pound of powdered Plaster of > Paris and a pastry tube...mixed powder with water to smooth > batter, poured it into pastry-tube the nozzle of which I > shoved up that malodorous maladied twat where at least one > young explorer had been wrecked on his maiden-voyage -- and > squeezed! > *Avant-garde* frictional fiction has ever rung with praise > for the whore with the heart of gold. Now I give you > something new: the whore with the plaster vagina!" If that > act is not of "redeeming" importance, I'd like to see one > that is. > ............................ > All in all, a highly entertaining book. > > --Gary Taylor > > In addition, NAMBLA is an organization which hates Jews. That information > comes from PENTHOUSE Magazine. In the January '85 issue of PENTHOUSE > Magazine, there is an article about child-molesters. In that article, there > is a quote from a NAMBLA publication as follows: > > That the New York Press (even the left wing Guardian!) still > swallow Judi as a legit source proves their gullibility--and > their complicity in the ongoing witch-hunt. Judi's abuses have > time and time again been publicly documented. Yet, like the > proverbial bad penny, she keeps turning up. And like any other > brazen loud Jewish kvetch, she won't close that motor-mouth > filled with lies. Every time that fat trap opens, she > jeopardizes public safety. > > Now, please don't misunderstand. As a Jew, I'm not complaining over the > fact that NAMBLA hates us, I'm bragging about it. We Jews must be doing > something right, in order for a bunch of creeps like that to hate us! > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Now, if you have a shell account with your ISP and run the nn metagroup > command as follows: "nn -mxX -skike", you will be amazed at all the > neo-Nazis, both homosexual and heterosexual you will find. It appears that > Usenet is being overrun with neo-Nazis, both homosexual and heterosexual. > > I noticed that one of these neo-Nazi messages was crossposted to the > newsgroup "alt.fan.adolf-hitler." Does anyone know if such a newsgroup > actually exists? > > firstname.lastname@example.org (Fred Cherry) > > Grand Duke of Yugoslobia > Duke of Vulgaria > Grand Muff-Diver of Jerusalem > & Elector of Homophobia
From: "J.M. Ivler" <email@example.com> Newsgroups: soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,alt.revisionism,misc.education,alt.education Subject: Re: Thomas Jefferson, jews, and Pavlov's Dogs Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:13:05 -0000 Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> References: <1Qw97.30014$A47.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <4LXf7.74838$A47.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <uH3g7.75168$A47.email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <Gjwg7.76990$A47.email@example.com> <9lu4kh$b28fs$1@ID-62889.news.dfncis.de> <firstname.lastname@example.org> <p%xg7.77036$A47.email@example.com> User-Agent: tin/1.4.3-20000502 ("Marian") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.5.1 (sun4m)) X-Complaints-To: firstname.lastname@example.org Lines: 52
In misc.education fm <email@example.com> wrote: >> .3% of *all* drivers have a BAC > .10. And according to Johnnies numbers >> they are responsible for more than 5.5% of all fatal accidents. He seems >> to see no correlation between those two numbers.
> You don't seem to be able to answer the question, not even using your bogus > numbers.
Poor Johnnie can't read and understand tables, set theory or even plain English. Johnnie, do you not see that having .3% of a group perfom a negative action on over 5.5% of that same group would seem to deem it necessary to stop them from KILLING people in a percentage far more than their population.
> Why is that? Because you are a STUPID kike?
Alas, unlike you I am not inbreed and living under a trailer in a trailer park. If that makes me a "STUPID kike" then I would rather be that than whatever you claim to be.
> It used to be that many of us believed that kikes had such a different view > of the world because of their racist attitude and mealy backgrounds. But > now you have made it abundantly clear that the only reason you could > possibly "think" so differently because you're SO STUPID.
Yep. Understanding the fourth grade concept of set theory makes me "SO STUPID". When you don't understand that you must be, what is your word again, oh yes, the Johnnieism is "stupider".
> Let's try this one more time. SEVENTEEN TIMES as many drivers in accidents > had a BAC less than .10 than had a BAC of .10+.
Let's try this again, the set of all drivers that don't have a BAC > .10 is far more than "SEVENTEEN TIMES" the size of the set that has a BAC > .10. 99.7% to .3%. Now, do you see why your numbers are meaningless?
> a) What percentage of these drivers do you "think" had an accident > *because* they had a BAC less than .10? > b) What percentage of these drivers do you "think" had an accident > *because* they had a BAC of .10+?
all of those that were impared by alcohol had accidents because they were impared. If they were impared at .10 or .08 or even .06, it doesn't matter. They were impared by the use of alcohol. Now, legally, in the US we don't go after people with under .08.
Now, you want to explain why your "SEVENTEEN" is so important when the reality is that one set is .3% and the other is 99.7% and there is far greater a difference there then there is in those that KILL becuase they are impared, verses those that are involved in accidents without being impared with a BAC > .10?