Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

 

Telegony

 

APPLIED TROPHOLOGY


(Circulation Restricted to Professional Use.)


Vol. 3 – No. 8                                                                                                                                       August – 1959


STANDARDS PROCESS LABORATORIES


 

 

“THE PHYSIOLOGY OF HEREDITY.”


 

“We resemble out parents and ancestors because our cell chromosomes carry to us the same set of plans – blueprints as it were – that guided the growth and development of those parents and ancestors.

It will be obvious that this presence of paternal “blueprints” in the blood of a female who has had a child by one husband and subsequently remarries, the children of the latter marriage will be carrying characteristics of both male mates.   This phenomena known as “telegony” was first noted by an English horse breeder who had a mare that had mated with a zebra and was observed to give birth to colts that all had signs of zebra stripes even when later mated to pure bred stallions.  Geneticists have denied this possibility only because they were unacquainted with the possible theory of how it could happen. Animal breeders in general are aware of the contaminating effect of a mongrel mating on a pure bred female, knowing that once such a mating occurs, no subsequent offspring will be true to type, cannot possibly be used as a show animal.  We here have an interesting biological justification for a double standard of morals for the two sexes.

Here is a quote from a book written in 1897 by M. I. Holbrook, M.D.: ”Telegony” – There is one remarkable phenomenon spoken of by various writers as telegony, which has important bearing on the subject of the transmission of acquired characters, and shows the action of prenatal influence in an unexpected form.   It is referred to by Professor Romanes, when he says, ‘It has not unfrequently (sic) been observed at any rate in mammals, that when a female has borne progeny to a male of one variety, and subsequently bears progeny to a male of another variety, the younger progeny presents a more or less unmistakable resemblance to the father of the older one.’

 “Professor Romanes made particular enquiries on this subject of professional and amateur breeders of animals, and he says most of his correspondents, ‘are quite persuaded that it is of frequent occurrence, many of them regard it as a general rule, while some of them go so far as to make a point of always putting a mare, bitch, etc,. to a good pedigree male in her first season, so that her subsequent progenies may be benefited by his influence, even though they be engendered by inferior sires.’  His own more modest conclusion is that the evidence he obtained , ‘is enough to prove the fact of a previous sire asserting his influence on a subsequent progeny, although this fact is one of comparatively rare occurrence.’

“The English Darwinian met with only one case in which the offspring of a woman by a second husband, who was a white man, showed the influence of her first husband who was a Negro.  Mr. Herbert Spencer would seem to have been more successful.  In the contemporary Review for May, 1893, Mr. Spencer gives the result of his own enquiries as to the effect on a white woman’s subsequent progeny of a previous union with a Negro, and he quotes the opinion of a ‘distinguished correspondent,’ that information given to him many years ago was to the effect that ‘the children of white women by a white father had been repeatedly observed to show traces of black blood, in cases where the woman had previous connexion with,(i.e., a child by) a Negro.’  Mr. Spencer refers also to Professor Marsh as authority for such a case, and to the opinion of several medical professors who assured him, through Dr. W.J. Youmans, that the alleged result ‘is generally accepted as a fact.’  He gives as authoritative testimony the following statement by Dr. Austin Flint, taken from his ‘Textbook of Human Physiology’; ‘A peculiar and it seems to me, an inexplicable fact is, that previous pregnancies had an influence upon offspring.   This is well known to breeders of animals…  The same influence is observed in the human subject.  A woman may have by a second husband, children who resemble a former husband, and this is particularly well marked in certain instances by the color of the hair and eyes.

“This phenomenon would alone seem to answer the question of the transmission of acquired characters in the affirmative, for its explanation is to be found in the facts brought out by Darwin, as to the action of foreign pollen on the structure of the mother plant; it relation to which Professor Romanes remarks: ’When one variety fertilizes the ovules of another not unfrequently (sic) the influence extends beyond the ovules to the ovarium, and even to the calyx and flower stalk, of the mother plant.  This influence, which may affect the shape, size, colour, and texture of the somatic tissues of the mother, has been observed in a large number of plants belonging to many different orders.”

1 Human genetics, R.r. gates, Macmillan, vol.2 pps 993, 935, 937, 1946.

2 Stirpiculture. M.L. Holbrook, M.D. , pp. , 85 and 88, 1897, GSTH---

 

(End of quotes.)



horizontal rule

TELEGONY --  by Sir Robert the Bruce of Frenz -- 10 July 2002

horizontal rule


Telegony is the name given to the hypothesis that offspring can inherit characteristics from a previous mate of the mother. Breeders call this "throwing back" and physiologists call it "infection of the germ". The idea here is that the entire female's ovum apparatus is affected by the sperm, and hormones, which are injected by the male. There is an absorption factor here and absorption of many substances through ostensible membrane barriers is common knowledge. Otherwise the market for Ben Gay, beauty pastes, cellulite creams, and nicotine patches would simply be non existent.

I have mentioned earlier that Africans over the centuries have noted that when a wildebeest bull (genus Connochaetes) mates with a domestic cow (genus Bos), the cow is rendered sterile and is subsequently killed by the herders.

I have observed one example relative to a White colleague who married a White woman with mulatto children, where his children had a negro taint to their looks and behavior. Coincidence or what, I do not know, but years ago while still earning a living as a machinist, I was familiar with another case where George P.'s kids, from a similar situation, also appeared somewhat negro.

It has been often recorded that mares (Equus caballus, horse) who had previously mated with zebras (Equus grevyi), and subsequently mated with their own kind, often had foals with stripes on their legs. This was noted by people such as Charles Darwin, L. Agassiz, W.B. Carpenter and G.J. Romanes. Quite naturally, other reasons were given for those observations and many people on the experimental end claim they cannot find any evidence in their results, for telegony.

The doctrine of "infection" is ancient and widespread, and one might wonder if observation did not reinforce, or affirm,  then why the tenacity of such a belief over the centuries? It would certainly be to any breeder's benefit to believe the contrary -- that their mares are not contaminated by previous mating. Whatever the views of stock owners in the past, it is clearly evident that all of the English and Continental breeders of the period 1700-1920, were fully satisfied that it was truth, and acted accordingly. The veterinarian which tended to my grandfather's live stock held similar views and grandfather once related that a stray scrub bull once 'ruined' his prize Holstein, Mary Lou. It remains difficult for me to believe that telegony is made from the same fabric as groundless gossip.

Dog breeders, especially, are generally quite firm in their belief in telegony and this is in evidence even as I write.

Telegony -- true or false? As with all schools of thought, there are opposing views and the dispute arises since science, contrary to popular opinion, does not know everything. This clearly is demonstrated in the changing view of the atom and in nearly all aspects of nutrition. Once vitamin C was isolated, the belief was that it could be given in tablet form to produce the same effects as eating natural foods containing it. This view, now archaic, has been proved false and only persists due to the profits engendered by the promotion of such a view. We are now back to natural foods which is another enduring belief of the past many centuries. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing and one only has to study the views concerning the "harmless" radiation of the first atomic explosions. (See the video Atomic Cafe.) At that time, the "experts knew the truth" and they certainly let we gullible goyim know that they did. The years proved them wrong to the sorrow of thousands. If the Army had believed that the radiation was extremely dangerous, then I am sure the whole atomic explosion business would have taken an entirely different path. What other sacred cows will be demolished in the future? The number will certainly be quite large.

Telegony -- truth or fiction? Many of the practical people who do work with livestock and breeding, generally accept it as fact. The myopic microscope users, and technocrats who love to nit-pick over trivia, say there is no evidence to support such a belief. It always makes more sense to err on the side of caution. If telegony is only a spurious vapor then it remains a vacuous proposition when applied, for it will produce no ill effects. However, if there is substance to telegony, than one invites disaster if he believes it to be false. If I assume incorrectly that the salt-looking substance in the shaker is potassium cyanide, and I toss it out, then what did I lose if it really were table salt?

I bring to your attention that all dispute over telegony deals entirely with the offspring and not one thing is mentioned of any possible effect upon the female. I find it very hard to believe that a White female's delicate sexual apparatus, complete with glands, ova, and other vitals, could remain unaffected by continual bombardment of the biological discharges of Black men which, incidentally, are chemically distinct from those of a White man. There is a whole lot more to the differences of blood, and semen, than mere DNA. We need no DNA to tell one blood from another, or one ejaculate from another.

I am writing briefly on this topic due to the number of email questions I have received. I am sure that those asking were less interested in what happens to Herefords or Spaniels, than they do about women who practice race-mixing. I, like Eric, have yet to meet one Black woman who provides sex appeal. Physically, each and every attribute I seek in a female is absent in the Black woman. A statue, or porno photo, while resembling female, simply holds no appeal either. I find nothing in Black people that would invite my friendship, and attraction between these two species seems preposterous to me. But then again, I never understood John Cromwell who was frequently spied mounting Mr. Betzhold's heifers, or Dr. Wade's daughter who was observed more than once playing bitch to her Collie..

Very few people seek truth. What they seek is affirmation of their held views -- as if they weren't sure of them. You cannot ever prove anything to anyone unless they are willing to accept your argument. That is a rare occurrence. Even if you ask a person what it will take to prove something to them, most deceive themselves by offering something such as, "If it's signed by Herr Professor Doctor Heinz Gerstenberg." If you happen to obtain such a document and show it to your antagonist, I'll bet that he will find some way to reject it, for that is the way of bone-headed people. They want to argue, not learn. The argument is a mere contest to see who "wins". Debates are always ego trips.

We White men often like to show the downside of race-mixing, of which evidence abounds. Let's assume that there are no "side effects" and that Matilda views sex is a neutral thing whether the object is Aids Johnson or Bush's pet goat. The question is then: Why do it? Have all the White males vanished? Or is there some dark reason like a hatred for your own kind? Whatever the reason, all life strives to reproduce its own kind. Black people and White people are not the same kind, for "kind" means kin, and kin are of the same blood, that is, they have a common ancestor. Pray tell, who is the common ancestor of Robert Mugabe and George Washington?

Since I have no personal interest in filling any available orifice, I do not concern myself with telegony, AIDS, or syphilis, one way or the other. As I intend to rob no banks, I have no interest in what penalty the law provides.

Believe what you will.

I know that many who read this will endeavor to research the matter further. Be advised that since the judeo-communist military victory of 1945, "history" is being rewritten to fit the goals of World ZOG. I personally take with 6 grains of salt, any so-called reference which was printed after 1930. The Encyclopedia Britannica is a good example. Once a standard of reference, the purchase by jewish interests in the 1920s, has resulted is a downgrading, and revision, of previous topics. I again repeat that one should apply his own god-given powers of observation and logic, in preference to something written by others, including myself. Train to be of independent thought. That's a good way to reduce your number of friends. You'll be better for it.

Just because it is new, doesn't mean it is correct. Just because it is old, doesn't mean it should be dismissed.

 
 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party