FOR ALL>>>Some of you may have heard of the place in central London called, "The City"--It has been the international financial center of the world ever since Cromwell's time after he made the mistake of permitting Jews to return to England...When he let them back into England, they used the Crown Jewels as collateral and set up the Bank of England...anglicized their names, intermarried with the British Nobility and never looked back..Now, in collaboration with this current, mainly Jewish Administration and their kinsmen of the UK, the principle theme of their "bible", the Talmud and its goal of world dominion under the aegis of the Jew, is now forming but they are getting reckless....making demands that are beginning to awaken many to who really is running the show, so to speak...For certain, this admininstration and that of the current British leaders, are only the "action officers" of the Great Sanhedrin which is now calling the shots...but, like all well organized conspiracies and secret plans, there is a greater Controller who always disrupts those who seek to violate His plans so well outlined in the Bible.
Today, as it has been for centuries, the world's daily Gold price is set arbitrarily by only 6 men, all internationalist Jews working for the Rothschild Banks..(And you thought that the "market" determined the Gold Price!) .But, the "City" is a most secluded and controlled space but it still retains its dominion over the western world...How and why this has been permitted to happen is outlined in this 19 page article...a Keeper...>JRN
----- Original Message -----
From: Cal Steinberger
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 9:26 PM
Subject: Fw: The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, private, independent, State
Because this is such a "hard read", and because of its importance, I want to make this e-mail my last one for about the next 24 hours. Please take the time to study it closely! You will notice the name of "Rothschild" mentioned throughout the article. What I call the "International Banking Cartel" is controlled by the Rothschild Dynesty. It is the Zionist factor in the whole conspiracy.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jack Lancaster
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:12 PM
Subject: The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, private, independent, State
City of London Corporation
The City of London Corporation is a Masonic, private, independent,
sovereign state occupying approximately one square mile within
the heart of the greater London area inside the old Roman walls of
It either directly or indirectly, controls all mayors, councils,
councils, multi-national and trans-national banks, corporations,
judicial systems (through Old Bailey, Temple Bar and the Royal
Courts of Justice in London), the IMF, World Bank, Vatican Bank
(through N. M. Rothschild & Sons London Italian subsidiary
Torlonia), European Central Bank, United States Federal Reserve
(which is privately owned and secretly controlled by eight
British-controlled shareholding banks), the Bank for International
Settlements in Switzerland (which is also British-controlled and
oversees all of the Reserve Banks around the world including our
own) and last but not least, the communist European Union and
communist United Nations Organization.
The supreme ruler of the City is the Lord Mayor who is elected
once a year and lives in the Mansion House. The City has a
resident population of about 5,000 that rises to about two million
during the week when people surge in and out each day to work.
The financial centre of the world, it is often termed the 'wealthiest
square mile on earth.'
The full title of the Square Mile's governing body is the 'Mayor,
Aldermen and Commons of the City of London in Common Council
Assembled.' The Court of leadership consists of the Lord Mayor, 25
Aldermen and 130 Common Councilmen.
All of the giant, largely Jewish international banks and
corporations in the City of London that control the world are
members of one or another of the Twelve Great Livery Companies
domiciled in Guildhall (or the Hall of the City of London Corporation).
As the result of a 'gentleman's agreement' between the
sovereign and the City merchants and bankers made many
hundreds of years ago, the Lord Mayor is officially head of the
Corporation and is allowed to operate independently of the
sovereign. However, the wealth of the world held in the
Corporation ultimately is the sovereign's, because, should the
gentleman's agreement break down, the sovereign has the power to
"rescind" the Corporation's independence. The Queen sometimes
refers to the Corporation as "The Firm."
While ostensibly the power of the monarchy appears to be
diminishing as the Queen voluntarily gives her Commonwealth
countries their independence and they become republics chartered
to the United Nations, and she actively works toward abolishing the
sovereignty of Britain as the UK is broken up and divided into
regions of the European Union ï¿½ her City of London Corporation
multi-national banks and corporations are quietly taking over
the world. All of the big banks and companies in both New Zealand
and Australia are either directly or indirectly City of London-
In ancient times the City marshals and sheriffs were employed to
ensure that all the "council" rates and taxes were paid to the City
on behalf of the king. After the conquest of William the Conqueror
in 1066, who first brought the Jewish bankers to London from
France, the Jews developed written credit agreements for the king,
(in French called "mort-gages" ï¿½ mort 'death' gage 'bond') and it was
the marshal's and sheriff's jobs to ensure that all the interest
payments of these "death-bonds" were paid to the Jews on behalf of
During the reign of Richard I (the Lionheart) after the serious
downturn in the economy as the result of the cost and tax
impositions of the Crusades, many farmers, business people and
peasants had defaulted on their "mort-gages" throughout England.
As the result, the Jews promptly commenced seizing the
commoner's property for not paying the interest, rates and taxes
to the City and King. Subsequently, a rapid increase in hate
against the "King's Jews" was initiated. This led to the massacre of
Jews at York in 1190. New York in America was later named by
British Jewish immigrant bankers in memory of the event.
For 100 years the commoner's hate against the "King's Jews"
fermented until 1290, when, under pressure from the people,
Edward III finally suspended the Mayoralty and reluctantly banished
all Jews from his kingdom when 16,000 left England ï¿½ and didn't
begin to return until around the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603)
when the enormous power of the City really began to accelerate
with the opening of the world's first stock exchange in London ï¿½
and has continued unabated to the present day.
While there have been rare occasions when the Lord Mayor and
Commalty of the City, as a result of their colossal wealth and
power have been able to subtly out-maneuver the monarch, as to
their cost, Richard II, Charles I and James II were to learn to their
fate ï¿½ generally speaking this has been the exception rather than
Ultimately, whoever successfully rules must have the "will" of the
people. Historically, in the City many although certainly not all
monarchs, have ruled with the "will" of their subjects. But rarely, if
ever, have the bankers, rich barons or knights been respected in
this position. More often than not they've been consistently hated.
Even when monarchs have done a poor job, provided they have still
had the "will" of the people, the wealthy bankers' position has been
extremely "perilous" to say the least.
After forty years of misrule by Henry III, the Lord Mayor, Thomas
Fitzthomas (1261-1264) and the Aldermen defied the king. On this
particular occasion the Lord Mayor ended up being thrown into the
Tower where he died. Henry III vetoed nine Mayors in his long reign,
and jailed another who died in prison.
On one occasion the threat to the Lord Mayor's massive wealth
and power has not come directly from the monarch, but from
the people themselves. Mayor Nicholas Brembre (1383-1385) had
been a king's man during the peasant's revolt, and was knighted by
Richard II (similar to Sir Barry Curtis, Mayor of Manukau City in
New Zealand today) for curbing the ambitions of his uncle, John of
Gaunt. But Brembre had few friends among the common people
having deposed the popular Mayor Adam Stable, and when he
re-imposed the hated Poll Tax which had caused the revolt, the
mob turned on him. He was given a mockery of a trial and was then
hanged, drawn and quartered.
Understandably, therefore, >from the time of Richard II most of the
"Lord Mayors" in the City of London and others in the realm
became very "cautious" and "hesitant" about any proposal which
could be seen as an "unreasonable demand" to levy rates or taxes
for the City and king. However, today these events have all but
>From the time of William the Conqueror in 1066 up to the time of
the Reformation the City of London Corporation was Roman
Catholic. (The modern global "company" and "corporate" business
system that we know today grew out of the old Roman Catholic
dioceses in England which were the world's first "corporations").
During the reigns of Henry VIII (1491-1547) and Elizabeth I (1558-
1603) when the Church of England, knights and barons took over
the assets of the Roman Catholic Church in England, the City then
Gradually, as the people of England apostatized and turned away
from the Protestant King James Bible and Christianity in general,
both Roman Catholic and Protestant, in the late 1800's the City
and Monarchy became rabidly Socialist.
The Beginning of Socialism in London
The religion of Socialism is based primarily on the teachings of the
pagan Greek philosopher and writer Plato, and especially his book
The Republic, in which 400 years before the time of Christ he
dreamed of a "World Republic" headed not by a president, but by a
royal "world philosopher king" or "prince" (like himself of course!).
Both Karl Marx and Hitler were great students of Plato. It is only
inevitable that the planned reformed United Nations and EU will one
day be headed by this "Philosopher Prince."
Socialism officially first began in 1880 in London when H. M.
Hyndman founded the Rose Street Club which was dedicated to
the destruction of Christianity in England.
In 1884 the group changed its name and came to be called the
Social Democratic Federation. Its early members deceptively
called themselves "Christian Socialists." Later the group's
membership included the Jew, Karl Marx's daughter, Eleanor Marx
and her husband Professor Aveling. Behind the scenes the group
was largely controlled by Engels, Karl Marx's partner. Because
Hyndman would not obey the orders of Engels, Eleanor Marx and
her husband split off with William Morris the poet and others and
started an opposition group which they called the Socialist League.
On January 4, 1884, members and past members of the Social
Democratic Federation, the Socialist League and others founded
the Fabian Society.
The first meeting of the Fabian Society was held at the home of Mr
E. R. Pease, a member of the London Stock Exchange. Two of the
leading members were George Bernard Shaw and Sidney Webb.
Other early members were Eleanor Marx, theosophist and occultist
Annie Besant, and author H. G. Wells.
The name of the society was suggested by the Spiritualist, Frank
Podmore, who named it after the brilliant, elderly, third century
Roman general, censor and consul, Quintus Fabius (Maximus
Verrucosus) (303-203 BC) who was made a dictator in 221-217 BC
and, with his small band of fighting guerillas and superior cunning,
successfully defended Rome by defeating Hannibal's much bigger
and mighty Carthaginian army through "gradualism" and
"terrorism" during the time of the second Punic War.
Initially he kept to the hills and cunningly hampered the enemy's
progress by cutting off their food and supply lines with "delaying
tactics" until Rome could assemble enough men to defend the city
successfully. During the war, his slow, "gradual," delaying tactics
were greatly disapproved of by his soldiers and the civilians and
earned him the name of 'Cunctator' ï¿½ the 'Delayer.' But later, after
the triumph, his skill and wisdom was highly appreciated. He died
in his 100th year in 203 BC.
Fabian Socialism is a "mixture" of Fascism, Nazism, Marxism and
Communism all bundled together. However, it is much more deadly
because it is much more clever and subtle. The only difference
between Fabian Socialism and Communism is that Communists
take your house by directly sending in the "secret police" to knock
your front door down ï¿½ Fabian Socialists do it much more subtly
and cleverly ï¿½ by "gradually" taking your individual rights
away, by "gradually" increasing property taxes and rates, and
finally, when you can't pay them, they send in their regional
"council tax inspectors" to take your house away ï¿½ but the end
result is the same.
British PM Tony Blair and President George Bush Junior's globalist
"war on terror" is a classic Fabian Socialist strategy.
The philosophy of the Fabian Society was written in 1887 and
included the statement: "The Fabian Society acknowledges the
principal tenet of Marxism "the abolition of private property etc."
(of course this does not apply to the elect oligarchy at the top
who end up owning the lot!).
Sidney and Beatrice Webb published a book of 1143 pages in
defense of Bolshevism. It was entitled Soviet Communism: A New
Civilization. In April 1952 the Webbs were exposed before a US
Senate Committee on the Judiciary when Soviet Colonel I. M.
Bogolepov, a former Red Army officer, stated that the entire text
had been prepared by himself in the Soviet Foreign Office.
Appropriately, the defiant coat of arms of the Fabian Society
(commissioned by author/playwright co-founder George Bernard
Shaw) today (now archived) is a "wolf in sheep's clothing." Until
recently it also appeared on the Fabian glass window (now
removed) in the Beatrice Webb House at Dorking, Surrey.
Today the Fabian Society is among other things the intellectual
wing of the British Labour Party. Before Tony Blair became British
Prime Minister in May 1997, he was Chairman of the Fabian
Since the 1997 British general election there have been around 200
Fabian MP's in the House of Commons, some of whom have
formed almost entire Labour Cabinets including Gordon Brown,
Robin Cook, Jack Straw, David Blunkett, Peter Hain, Patricia
Hewitt, John Reid, Ruth Kelly, Alan Milburn, and Clare
Short. Headed by Tony Blair, Fabians now dominate the entire
British government. They are resident in all parties and sit on all
important select committees, commissions and organizations
allied to the government. A good web-site on the subject is:
The Fabian Society literally controls the European Union. German-
born Gisela Stuart, the Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston
since 1997, and member of the House of Commons Foreign Affairs
Select Committee, was one of two House of Commons'
Representatives on the European Convention and a member of
the Presidium of the Convention on the Future of Europe. The
Presidium was the drafting body that created the draft Constitution
for Europe. In her book, The Making of Europe's Constitution ,
published in December 2003 by the Fabian Society, p. 20-21,
"In the early months, the Presidium members would meet in a
small room in the Justus Lipsius Building some fifteen minute
walk from the European Parliament. Attendance was limited to
the thirteen members, the Secretary General Sir John Kerr, his
deputy and the press officer. Sir John Kerr, a former Permanent
Secretary of the British Foreign Office, conducted the proceedings
inside the Presidium and in the plenary sessions of the Convention
with deft diplomatic skill as might be expected from someone who
John Major called 'Machiavelli' in his autobiography. The best
description of his talents I heard was: 'When Kerr comes up to you
and asks for the time, you wonder why me and why now?'
On several occasions, we would retreat to the Val Duchess ï¿½ a
small palace used by the Belgian foreign minister. It was at one of
the dinners at Val Duchess that the skeleton of the draft
constitution was given to members of the presidium in sealed
brown envelopes the weekend before the public presentation. We
were not allowed to take the documents away with us. Just
precisely who drafted the skeleton, and when, is still unclear to
me, but I gather much of the work was done by Valery Giscard
d'Estaing and Sir John Kerr over the summer. There was little time
for informed discussion, and even less scope for changes to be
Today the Labour Parties in both New Zealand and Australia are
closely affiliated to the Fabian Society in London.
When Australian Labour Party Prime Minister Bob Hawke (a
Rhodes Scholar), was guest of honour at the Fabian Society's
Centenary Commemoration Dinner in Melbourne on May 18, 1984,
"I gladly acknowledge the debt of my own government to
Fabianism. Earlier I dealt at some length with the principle of the
inevitability of 'gradualness.' There is another important idea, a
method more than a principle ï¿½ which becomes closely associated
with Fabianism. Sydney Webb called it 'permeation.' Today it
would be called 'consensus.'
Webb put it this way. Most reformers think that all they have to do
in a political democracy is to obtain a majority. This is a profound
What has to be changed is not only the vote that is cast, but also
the mental climate in which Parliament and Government both live
and work. That I find to be an accurate description of the approach I
and my colleagues have tried to bring to the affairs of the nation in
our first term of office."
In June 2001, at the Federal Government joint standing committee
on treaties inquiry into whether Australia should support a statute
of the UN International Criminal Court which would affect the
"sovereignty" of all Australians, when criticized by an Australian
patriotic group, Labour Party Senator Chris Schacht, sarcastically
exclaimed he had been a member of the Fabian Society for 20
years ï¿½ and further, said; "You probably were not aware that us
Fabians have taken over the CIA, KGB, M15, ASIO (Australian
Security Intelligence Organization), IMF, the World Bank and many
That is why Tony Blair, as part of the 2006 Commonwealth Games
Closing Celebrations in Melbourne on March 26, was also invited
by Labour officials and business leaders to speak to the Australian
Parliament in Canberra on March 27 about his Fabian "war against
terror," and "intelligence matters" where he said; "The war against
terror was as much a battle about values as it was about arms." ï¿½
And why, after the Australian Government meeting, he flew directly
to New Zealand on March 28 to speak about the same subject at
a meeting in the Auckland Town Hall, hosted by the New Zealand
Labour Party Prime Minister, Helen Clark, and the Auckland
Regional Chamber of Commerce and Industry ï¿½ after which he
participated (by video-link) in the International Climate Change
Conference in Wellington on March 29, and later discussed with
Prime Minister Helen Clark his ("Fabian Society") "initiative to set
up a unit in the NZ public services to enable their respective
Labour Governments to co-operate more closely on policy
development" ( NZ Herald, March 28, 2006 pg. A3) and on "security
ï¿½ intelligence matters" as communist China is brought into the fold.
In the last century, members of the British Fabian Society dynastic
banking families in the City of London financed the Communist
takeover of Russia.
Trotsky in his biography refers to some of the loans from these
British financiers going back as far as 1907. By 1917 the major
subsidies and funding for the Bolshevik Revolution were co-
ordinated and arranged by Sir George Buchanan and Lord Alfred
Milner. The Communist system in Russia was a "British
experiment" designed ultimately to become the Fabian Socialist
model for the British takeover of the world through the UN and EU.
Fabian Society "Five Year Plan"
The British plan to takeover the world and bring in a "New World
Order" began with the teachings of John Ruskin and Cecil Rhodes
at Oxford University.
Rhodes in one of his wills in 1877 left his vast fortune to Lord
Nathan Rothschild as trustee to set up the Rhodes Scholarship
Program at Oxford to indoctrinate promising young graduates for
the purpose, and also establish a secret society for leading
business and banking leaders around the world who would work for
the City to bring in their Socialist world government.
Rothschild appointed Lord Alfred Milner to implement the plan. At
first the society was called Milner's Kindergarten, then in 1909 it
came to be called the Roundtable. It was to work closely with the
London School of Economics founded in 1894 by Fabian Socialist
leader Sidney Webb (Lord Passfield).
Today former Rhodes Scholars (such as Bill Clinton), Fabian
Business Round Table members, and graduates from the London
School of Economics (the primary Fabian Socialist training school
in the world) dominate the global banking, business and political
systems in every country.
The British Fabian Society plan to takeover the world by the City of
London financial community was first published in a book entitled
All These Things by a New Zealand author and journalist, A. N.
The book was first published in 1936 by Omni Publications in the
United States (and censored in New Zealand).
The document, called "Freedom and Planning" was secretly
circulated in 1932 by the inner councils of the members of the
Political Economic Plan, otherwise known as "P.E.P." in London.
The then chairman of the organization was a City of London Jew,
Israel Moses Sieff, who was the reputed author of the plan. The
headquarters of P.E.P. were at 16 Queen Anne's Gate, London.
Mr Sieff was also chairman and financier of Marks and Spencer's'
chain stores and vice-president of the British Zionist Society.
Centered around City of London Jewry's international financiers in
the Bank of England subsidiary, the Bankers Industrial
Development Company, the essence of the document "Freedom
and Planning" was (and still is) to gradually "Sovietize" the world
based on their "Five Year Plan" inaugurated in Moscow in 1927-28
in the Soviet Union.
Basically the plan involved the subtle transfer of the entire
productive capacity of each country throughout the world into a
series of great "State-owned" departments, which would then be
"corporatized", then "privatized" to City of London Corporation
International banks and corporations which they control.
Individual property ownership would be severely restricted, with
most of the land, sea, fisheries, rivers, lakes, ports, railways,
communications, media, roads, electricity, energy, food, water,
waste management, housing, farms, commercial property,
schools, hospitals, police, social welfare, Inland Revenue etc.
transferred into statutory corporations, companies or land
trusts which indirectly would be owned by City of London banks.
The "peasants" would still be allowed to own their own clothes, and
small assets like furniture, cars and boats etc., but the main
assets of each country would be owned by their multi-national
corporations and banks.
In essence the City of London Corporation would become the "One
World Earth Corporation" and would privately own the world.
Similar to the experiment carried out in the in the USSR, the whole
world would eventually be transferred into a Communist "United
Nations" World Soviet Socialist Republic, where each country
would be "regionalized" and ruled through "Regional Councils"
through a United Nations dictatorship called a "Parliamentary
Assembly" which would be just another name for a Soviet "Central
Committee" ï¿½ and all independent, sovereign, national governments
would be totally abolished.
Fabian Society Privatization of the World
As the result of the P.E.P. Plan originally formulated in 1932, right
now every country's "State assets" (owned in trust by the State on
behalf of the people) are being frantically "privatized" by City of
London-controlled banks and corporations primarily under the
directions of two leading Fabian Socialist writers ï¿½ Sir Roger
Douglas and John Redwood.
Sir Roger Douglas's book Unfinished Business and John
Redwood's book Public Enterprise in Crisis are the primary
handbooks being used by central and local government finance
ministers and officers all around the world to sell off each nation's
"family silver" and State assets ï¿½ with the more "sensitive" public
assets being transferred into Fascist-type Public-Private
Partnerships (PPP's) which are designed to make the public
masses and peasantry "think" that they have some degree of
control ï¿½ when in reality they have none as the real ownership of the
assets are held by the City of London banks and corporations
who fund them.
Until relatively recently, John Redwood was head of N. M.
Rothschild & Sons London global Overseas Privatization Unit that
is coordinating the entire global privatization process. Sir Roger
has been contracted as a consultant by City of London Banks, the
World Bank and others to advise on national privatization programs
Fabian Society "Regionalization" of the World through UN and EU
Control of Regional and City Councils
All of the countries in the world currently are being "regionalized."
Presently, for example, the whole of the United States is being
"regionalized" and the EU Committee of the Regions, based in
Brussels, is "regionalizing" every country in the European Union.
As the result of this radical "regionalization" process, Britain has
now already been effectively abolished, having been divided up into
9 separate regions of the EU, plus Wales, Scotland and Northern
Ireland. This cunning process, which is being "gradually"
implemented to destroy the power of the central national
government in each country, is commonly referred to as
"Devolution" by the Queen and Fabian Society.
Unlike the rest of the autonomous regions in the UK which, like
most of the other regions in the EU that have become virtually
powerless through their representation in the European Parliament
which is now only a "talking shop", the City of London Corporation
as a separate region by itself within the Union now rules it. This is
because all of the Commissioners are appointed (not elected) to
the European Commission by City of London-controlled business
leaders and bankers in their respective countries.
Right now throughout the UK all city councils and regional councils
are dramatically increasing their rate demand on their constituent's
properties, while at the same time they are quickly expanding their
debt levels for unaffordable capital works programs via loans from
City of London banks ï¿½ which policies are deliberately intended to
prepare for the councils' "privatization" whilst transferring the
local government in each country to "regional councils" ï¿½ which
ultimately will become or be controlled by "Regional Parliamentary
Assemblies," identical to the old structure in the former Soviet
Union ï¿½ which first regionalized then abolished the national
governments before they set up their republican socialist police
"Sovietization" of Local Government in New Zealand
In New Zealand, the blatant UN "Sovietization" of the entire country
was implemented by the Hon. Dr. Michael Bassett, Minister of
Local Government, through the Local Government Amendment Act
(No.2) in 1989. This radical act reduced more than 600 different
local authorities throughout the country to 94: 13 regional councils,
74 district or city councils and seven special authorities.
This new structure of local government deftly created by the act
divided the whole country up into 14 "Soviet-styled" regions
governed by 13 regional councils and a district council (with the
Airborne Region being unique in that its district council was also to
become the regional council for that area.).
Under the 1989 Act, the district and city councils were designed to
continue to provide essential services such as water supply, roads,
sewage disposal and rubbish collection (which all ultimately would
be "privatized" or transferred into "Public-Private-Partnerships
(PPP's) which would finally end up being foreign-owned) and the
regional councils would take over many of the responsibilities
performed in the past by many special purpose authorities formerly
carried out by such agencies as catchment boards, harbor boards,
pest and noxious plant authorities etc.
Ultimately, this devious plan is to transfer many of the Central
Government tasks and responsibilities to regional councils as well,
which will be further subtly rationalized to become or be controlled
by "Sovietized" Regional Development Agencies and Regional
Parliamentary Assemblies ï¿½ to rule their unwary serfs and
peasants under strict Communist United Nations and Marxist EU
socialist law. These processes are now well advanced and are
almost complete in Britain, and are accelerating in all other
countries, including the United States. One could say that the
Fabian Socialist global "cake is about 95% baked!"
Communist "Sustainable Development"
In 1992 at the "communist" United Nations Conference on the
Environment and Development (UNCED) in Rio de Janero, Brazil,
co-chaired by former Soviet Union president Mikhail Gorbachev and
N. M. Rothschild-London agent Canadian billionaire Maurice
Strong, the UN unveiled a radical environmental philosophical
agenda which "inverted" the traditional values reflected in the Bible,
Magna Carta and US Constitution (which put man under God at the
head of his creation and dominion i.e. a man's rights were to have
superiority over those of animals, fish, plants, trees and forests
At the Earth Summit in Rio, an old pagan concept was introduced
which "inverted" all of our existing, constitutional, democratic,
personal and property rights and values espoused by Christianity ï¿½
and transferred them to the environment and the religion of mother-
earth Gaia worship. In this religion, a tree becomes more valuable
than a human being. A rare bird more valuable than a hospital.
This United Nations program of action unveiled in Rio was called
It is 300 pages long and is very complex. Primarily it is designed to
be implemented with other radical UN documents such as the
Global Biodiversity Assessment (1100 pages), promoted by the UN
Conference on Human Settlements, Habitat II. The first Habitat
conference was held in 1974 and specifically identified private
property ownership as a threat to the peace and equality of the
environment. It proposed to revolutionize the development of the
land and cities of each country under strict "Soviet-style"
environmental guidelines, called "Sustainable Development."
The UN's communist secret agenda through "environmentalism"
and "sustainable development" is very cunning and has deceived a
lot of well-meaning people.
Most people genuinely want to protect the environment and ensure
that the earth's resources are "sustainable" for future generations
there is no doubt. But the communist goal of "sustainable
development" and "environmentalism" has absolutely nothing to do
with protecting the environment or sustainability ï¿½ it is all about
abolition of property rights, and ultimately, collectivization of
housing and farms under corporate State control.
Under this system, farmers and property owner's rights would be
effectively extinguished and overridden by strict Environmental and
Sustainable Development resource consents and laws. They would
be told where they could farm, what "sustainable" land they could
"develop," (sustainable development) what trees they could plant or
cut down, what fertilizer if any they could apply, and they would
need "consents" and licenses for everything under the sun. City
dwellers would be in the same dire predicament, and have
their homes confiscated, or they'd be severely fined, if they cut
down a heritage tree, washed their car, boat or dishes using
detergent, or used the privatized corporation's water when they
shouldn't, especially if they were nabbed under their friendly
"Neighbourhood Watch Scheme," which scheme, incidentally, was
first implemented in the Soviet Union. Socialism is very subtle.
The penalty for cutting a tree down without the appropriate
government consent would become worse than murder. Not only
would you have to license your dog, to own a dog you would have
to be licensed too. Farmers would need to be licensed to operate
their collectivized farms, spray weeds, care for cattle and drive their
tractors under new Soviet-styled "health and safety" laws. All
tradesmen and professional workers would have to be accredited
and licensed, as would all Christian pastors and churches, and any
other persons or institutions that could be likely to criticize their
All potential young parents would need to have a license to have
children, and if there was any family genetic weakness of some
sort in their state-controlled doctor's medical records, no license
would be given. In the end you would need a license or permit to
take your boat on a lake, take your kid fishing off a wharf, or travel
between towns or cities. In other words ï¿½ full-blown Marxism.
The United Nations policy of "Sustainable Development" introduced
in 1992 at the UNCED at Rio de Janero, and implemented
through Habitat II and the UN World Commission on Environment
and Development ï¿½ is taken directly >from the USSR Constitution,
chapter 2, article 18, which reads:
"In the interests of the present and future generations, the
necessary steps are taken in the USSR to protect and make
scientific, rational use of the land and its mineral and water
resources, and the plant and animal kingdoms to preserve the
purity of air and water, ensure reproduction of natural wealth, and
improve the human environment."
National Party Prime Minister, Jim Bolger, attended the UN Earth
Summit in Rio de Janero in 1992 and signed on behalf of New
Zealand to commit the country to Agenda 21 and Sustainable
Labour Party Prime Minister Helen Clark attended the follow-up
summit in Johannesburg August 26 ï¿��������� September 4 2002 aptly
called the "World Summit for Sustainable Development," where
she attended the head of state sessions.
The summit has since been nicknamed "Rio+10 because it marked
the 10th anniversary of the first Earth Summit at Rio. NZ
Environment Minister Marion Hobbs led a 35-strong delegation to
the giant summit, and was one of five vice-presidents nominated by
the UN to lead the summit comprised of about 45,000 delegates.
Not only was N. M. Rothschild agent, Maurice Strong, Secretary-
General of the UN 1992 Rio Earth Summit, he personally worked
with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan to appoint three of his own
Earth Charter Commissioners to the 12-man advisory panel of the
World Conservation Bank
In September 1987, the 4th World Wilderness Congress was held
in Denver, Colorado, USA, which established the World
Conservation Bank. The congress was setup by none other than
London's (late) Baron Edmond de Rothschild, chairman of Banque
Privee Edmond de Rothschild, Geneva, Switzerland, and one
of the trustees of the International Wilderness Foundation that
sponsored the conference.
Approximately 1500 of the world's most powerful bankers and
leaders attended the congress, which was chaired by Rothschild
agent and Canadian multibillionaire, Maurice Strong. At the
congress, Edmond de Rothschild designated eminent financier I.
Michael Sweatman to be the first president of the World
Conservation Bank. Sweatman wrote the forward of the banks
Leading insiders of the biggest banks and UN agencies in the world
were present, including Maurice Strong "Mr Sustainable," David
Rockefeller head of the Chase Manhattan Bank "Mr Development"
and Mr David Ruckleshaus head of the UN Environmental
Protection Agency "Mr Environment" ï¿½ of course!
The World Conservation Bank is destined to become the final
World Bank and the "de-coupling mechanism" for City of London
parent banks to take over the assets of every country of the world.
The essence of their secret plan is this: After an orchestrated
period of global financial chaos triggered by a major war in the
Middle East or man-made state of emergency or natural disaster,
in which most of the world's banks will be deliberately collapsed
in the process, (wiping everybody's savings out in the crash), key
City of London banking parent creditors, are going to takeover all
the "mort-gages" (death-bonds) and assets of the world, and
transfer them to the World Conservation Bank.
The plan is very esoteric and cunning, and very difficult
for most to understand.
Already most government treasury departments are preparing for
such an event. As part of the preparation for this momentous event,
all of the world's individual currencies are to be merged into two or
three major currency groups, two of which are the euro and US
Finally, these currencies are to be replaced with the World
Conservation Bank's new electronic global currency, the "Earth
Dollar." This new currency is deceptively to be issued against the
collateral of 34 per cent of the Earth's surface that is presently
being transferred into huge UN Heritage Parks and Conservation
areas in every country across the globe, under the crafty deception
In short, the biggest banking conspiracy and deception ever to face
George W. Hunt, (95 Camino Basque, Boulder, Colorado 80302,
U.S.A.), a US businessman, attended the congress and produced
a video about it exposing their wicked and incredibly deceptive
plans. On his video he plays excerpts of key speeches recorded at
the congress. One such speech was made by David Lang, a
leading US financier and close personal friend and business partner
of Maurice Strong, who said:
"When the auditor finally gets his hands into the balance sheet, I
suggest therefore that this be sold not through a democratic
process. That would take too long and devour far too much of the
funds to educate the cannon fodder unfortunately which populates
the earth. We have to take an almost elitist program that we can
see beyond our swollen bellies and look to the future in time
frames and in results ï¿½ which are not easily understood or
which can be, with intellectual honesty, be reduced down to some
sort of simplistic definition."
"CANNON-FODDER!" ï¿½ this is what these leading, arrogant,
banking conspirators of the UN "Sustainable Development,"
"SmartGrowth," and World Conservation policies think of the world
general population ï������½ including all New Zealanders.
THESE are the wicked men that all the millions and millions of
naï¿½ve local/central government politicians and business leaders
throughout the world are now following.
The New Zealand government has already met its commitment and
transferred over 34 per cent of the entire country's land area into
UN Heritage Areas and Conservation Parks under this deceptive
plan. New Zealanders need to wake up and wake up fast.
The main business facilitators and organizations of the UN
Sustainable Development policies in the Asia-Pacific Region are
the Pacific Rim Institute of Sustainable Management, the NZ
Business Council for Sustainable Development and the Melbourne-
based Sustainable Investment Research Group (SIRIS). Equity in
this group, SIRIS, coincidentally, is held by IOOF Funds
Management and broking house JBWere ï¿½ that provide research for
N.M. Rothschild & Sons' Ethical Share Trust based in London.
The 1995 session the United Nations General Assembly passed a
number of rules. Rule 61, 62 and 63 gave local government, civil
organizations and private citizens the right to participate directly in
the development and implementation of these documents.
Directed by the IMF, World Bank, UN, and Prince of Wales
International Business Leaders Forum, the philosophy of
"sustainable development" basically says that there are too many
people on planet earth and there are not enough resources to go
around. What we need to do is urgently reduce the population,
preserve, conserve, and "ration" the remaining resources ï¿½ and
that the United Nations is the only body that can do it.
The World Bank already has a huge statistical database on
countries and individuals ï¿½ what they produce and what resources
they consume, water, energy, food, raw materials, heat, waste,
health, social services etc.
If the net figure is a plus, they are considered to be good
productive world citizens. If it is a negative, they are in line for
liquidation. These are all basically the same old
Socialist/Communist ideas as the "Marxist/Leninist" philosophy
and "planned economy" that permeated the old Soviet Union.
In 1992 at Rio, another key "Soviet-styled" strategy proposed by
the Agenda 21
Programme of Action from the United Nations Conference on the
Environment and Development (UNCED) was "SmartGrowth."
This agenda can be found in a UN companion book called Global
Biodiversity Assessment published by Cambridge University Press.
It proposes to model all the cities of the world on the Israel Moses
Seif P.E.P plan, and the "planned" economic system of
development used by Lenin and Stalin under the old Communist
Soviet system of local government.
The UN "SmartGrowth" legislation in the United States was first
passed in the State of Maryland in March 1997. Since then, it has
been gradually introduced by city and district councils all around
the world ï¿½ including our own here in New Zealand. Of course,
rarely if ever will you hear of the policy coming from a foul brood of
UN international bankers. While virtually all of the general public
are oblivious of this fact, usually individual councils will be happy
credit themselves as authors of the plans.
Bribery of Local Government Politicians
Based on a City of London corporate banking formula, a policy to
provide for "more appropriate rates of remuneration for council
members" was planned for in the Local Government Act (No.2)
1989. This was essentially recommended to effectively "bribe" City
Council, District Council, Regional Council and Community Board
members throughout New Zealand, particularly in the bigger
councils, to implement the Fabian Socialist policies from the
Central Government and Treasury which aimed to dramatically
increase property rates and taxes in the future, whether ratepayers
or constituents agreed with them or not.
Subsequently, these sweeping remuneration changes were
proposed by the politically appointed Higher Salaries Commission
on April 2002 increasing Auckland Mayor John Banks annual
salary from $47,007 to $146,107, a pay rise of $99,100, Manukau
Mayor Sir Barry Curtis a pay rise of $35,111, Hamilton
Mayor David Braithwaite a pay rise of $27,381, Auckland Regional
Council Chairwoman Gwen Bull a pay rise $37,872 and Tauranga
Mayor Jan Beange a pay rise of $9461.
Since April 2002, it is not just a coincidence that these are
precisely the councils that have been amongst the biggest culprits
who have demanded the most onerous rates rise from their
For example, Tauranga City's proposed average rate rise for the
2006-2007 year was leveled at 16.3 per cent (when inflation, wage
rises, benefits, pensions etc. and the change in the consumer
price index was running at about 3 per cent).
Even a five year old kindergarten child knows that this huge
disparity is entirely unfair and "unsustainable" for the majority of
their citizens, yet these highly paid Lord Mayors, Councilors and
UN vassals of the realm have the cheek and audacity to call their
plans "SmartGrowth" and "Sustainable Development."
Pauperization of Pensioners and the Middle Class
Just as there is a "close relationship" between the remuneration
rises of leading local body politicians with the overall level of
council rate-rise demand, so there is a "close relationship"
between the level of council rate-rise impositions and the financial
status of people living in each council ward or constituency.
The Fabian bankers already "own" the properties held by
ratepayers with a "mort-gage" on them. This includes all private
homes, farms, businesses and commercial property, local and
central government debt. All young people with student loans and
welfare beneficiary groups also come under this category. By and
large central bankers believe this group is not a worry as they are
already under their strict control and firmly in their grip through
welfare dependency or mort-gage "death-bond" fealty.
But the one group that Fabian Socialists hate the most are the
"freehold" property-owners. Hence, this group, more often than not,
is the "middle class" that is predominantly comprised of middle-
aged citizens and more particularly pensioners who are generally
the most asset-rich. As a result of this phenomenon, all global
residential property taxation and ratepayer tax policies are now
being subtly targeted against these particular groups to confiscate
all their properties.
Essentially the Fabian City of London banks envisage this to be
achieved through a variety of measures including onerous council
rate-rises, capital gains taxes on more expensive residential
properties, stamp duties, the introduction of Home Equity Release
Loans (usually for over-60's), aged health care, social welfare and
superannuation programs that debit the cost from the value of
recipient property estates, the introduction of Residential Equity
Taxes and attacks against Family Trusts.
Since council taxes were introduced in Britain in 1993, the average
council bill has increased by 121 per cent ï¿½ but it has soared by
149 per cent in areas which have a lot of older residents.
Chichester is the worst offender with a 173 per cent increase. The
average bill in the West Sussex town, where 23 per cent of
residents are retired, has jumped from ï¿½456 in 1993-1994 to ï¿½1,244
for 2005-2006. In the Dorset coastal town of Christchurch, where
pensioners make up 30 per cent of the population, the bills have
soared by 171 per cent from ï¿½441 to ï¿½1,193.
f the 20 local councils in England with the highest numbers of
pensioners, 18 have seen their bills rise faster than average over
the past 12 years, according to the research by Halifax Bank.
(Daily Mail, Saturday, November 26, 2005).
The targeting and planning of these exorbitant rate rises comes not
primarily from local councils, but from Central Government and
Treasury officials through the Minister of Local Government and the
Department of Internal Affairs acting under various OECD or UN
Borrowing Powers of Councils and the Stealing of Ratepayer's
Early in 1994 submissions were called for on Department of
Internal Affairs plans to repeal the 1956 Local Authority Loans Act
and for new borrowing powers to be placed in the 1974 Local
Up to 1994, most local authority borrowing had to be
approved by the Local Authorities Loans Board, which ensured
that all long-term borrowing by councils for a capital work or asset
had to be secured by future rates revenue. Since some loans were
exempted from the control and monitoring of the Board, such as
redemption loans, loans up to $50 million for local authorities with
populations more than 20,000, and loans up to $15 million for local
authorities with populations of less than 20,000, it was proposed
that the Local Authorities Loans Board should effectively become
redundant ï¿½ and new laws should be implemented which would
allow all local authorities to manage their financial costs and risks
themselves with details of their proposed borrowing programs
included in their annual plans.
1 Any comments to firstname.lastname@example.org