Forum

Free news

FREE blog

Donate

Search

Subscribe

jews/911

Feedback

dna

Gun poll

RCC

AIDS

Home

Fathers

Surveys

Holocaust

IQ

14th Amdt

19th Amdt

Israelites

NWO

Homicide

Blacks

Whites

Signatory

Talmud

Watchman

Gaelic

Traitors

Health?

 

News Story

Court invalidates VMI's exclusion of women (27Jun96)

On June 26, 1996, the US Supreme Court, by a vote of 7-1, declared that excluding women from the Virginia Military Institute, a state supported all-male college, violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment (US vs. Virginia). Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the Court's majority opinion, which also rejected the adequacy of Virginia's proposed leadership program at a private women's college as a remedy for VMI's exclusivity. Justice Antonin Scalia's dissent claimed that "change is forced upon Virginia... not by democratic processes but by" court order. Justice Clarence Thomas, whose son attends VMI, did not participate in the decision.

Lawyers for VMI argued that the men-only policy is based on a philosophy of leadership training that involves an extremely challenging physical and emotional military-style discipline (the "adversative" method). The state claimed that admitting women would make the school fundamentally alter its curriculum, which is justified by the state's interest in providing educational opportunities to students who can benefit from single-sex education. Virginia argued that a separate-but-equal educational opportunity for women is available at the state supported Virginia Women's Institute for Leadership at nearby Mary Baldwin College. VWLI, established under a 1994 court order holding that Virginia could not provide a single-sex military style education for men without also providing a comparable opportunity for women, does not use VMI's adversative method. VWLI uses a cooperative method to build self-esteem.

Lawyers for the US government, challenging VMI's exclusion of women, argued that, like racially segregated schools, there is no sufficient justification for maintaining tax-supported, sex-segregated institutions of higher education using different educational philosophies based on gender stereotypes. It also argued that the two programs are not equal -- VMI's resources, reputation, and the value of its degrees being significantly greater than VWLI's. Finally, the US disputed Virginia's claim that VMI's adversative method must substantially change with the admission of women.

Some VMI cadets expressed disappointment at the Court's decision, claiming that the presence of women will disturb cadet cohesion. The head of VMI, Josiah Bunting, said "This is a savage disappointment for the alumni." Attorney General Janet Reno said, "The Supreme Court overwhelmingly has given life to the promise in the Constitution that all of us deserve an equal shot at educational opportunity."

Sources: Linda Greenhouse, The New York Times WWW edition, 27Jun96; Joan Biskupic, Washington Post WWW edition, 27Jun96.

Related topics:

bulletequal protection of the law
bulletgender classifications
 

TRAITOR McCain

jewn McCain

ASSASSIN of JFK, Patton, many other Whites

killed 264 MILLION Christians in WWII

killed 64 million Christians in Russia

holocaust denier extraordinaire--denying the Armenian holocaust

millions dead in the Middle East

tens of millions of dead Christians

LOST $1.2 TRILLION in Pentagon
spearheaded torture & sodomy of all non-jews
millions dead in Iraq

42 dead, mass murderer Goldman LOVED by jews

serial killer of 13 Christians

the REAL terrorists--not a single one is an Arab

serial killers are all jews

framed Christians for anti-semitism, got caught
left 350 firemen behind to die in WTC

legally insane debarred lawyer CENSORED free speech

mother of all fnazis, certified mentally ill

10,000 Whites DEAD from one jew LIE

moser HATED by jews: he followed the law

f.ck Jesus--from a "news" person!!

1000 fold the child of perdition

 

Hit Counter

 

Modified Saturday, March 11, 2017

Copyright @ 2007 by Fathers' Manifesto & Christian Party