This is not an endorsement of the communists at the LA TIMES, which lacks so much socially redeemable qualities that me and my friends and family cancelled our subscriptions to it, but they did manage conduct a poll which was infinitely more reliable, more thoughtful, more accurate, more thorough, than anything CNN ever did. To wit, while mentally ill liberals believed CNN when they claimed Hillary had a 90% probability of beating Trump, their poll showed Trump with a 4 to 8 point lead (the equivalent of as many as 9.6 million votes).
We are now told that Hillary had 3 million more popular votes than Trump, which means that the total difference between the poll and the votes could be as high as 12.6 million votes.
Where did they come from?
The ONLY explanation is voter fraud.
It is amazingly easy to research voter fraud, so if you hear just one news source or ONE politician object to an investigation, you must never trust them ever again.
It's not just this election Trump will prove voter fraud in. During the 2012 race, the oh so lofty (but now consumed with leftists) Gallup Poll predicted that Romney would win against Obama by 4 points, but Obama supposedly won by 4 points, a swing of 8 points, or 9.6 million popular votes.
Again voter fraud is the only explanation.
Even the U.S. Census Bureau understands that for a number of reasons, a truly random selection of 3,000 citizens can be, and often is, more accurate than a census of the entire population.
Ditto for these elections.
The only poll they have cited is the CNN poll, and when asked to cite another poll, they refused. Conversely, it was actually the Gallup Polls of 2008 and 2012 (which Gallup promised to investigate and make their findings public, which they never did) which had already proven the scale of the voter fraud which President Trump is now investigating.
For a left wing organization like Gallup to even admit that two different Republican Candidates had a 4 point lead over a Democrat was remarkable enough by itself.
The things that Gallup tried to use as an excuse could not account for even 0.2% of their 4% error. And since Romney ALLEGEDLY lost by 4%, this means they were off by �only" 7.8% rather than 8%.
The margin of error was around 0.5%, which puts this at a low of 7.3% and a high of 8.5%.
And this means that the only way to explain the extra 8,760,000 to
9.6 million votes is voter fraud.
The guy who did the LA TIMES poll hates Trump and is VERY sorry that Hillary lost. If he fudged the data just a bit, rather than predicting that Trump would win by 4 points, it might have been six points. He makes the point that a mathematician like him should trust his data and ignore superfluous opinions which have nothing to do with his poll, and then goes on to do JUST that. He admitted that he was so embarrassed that he didn't even want to discuss it with his Danish friends, even though he's Danish, much less did he handle himself properly with the media. He admitted even after Trump was elected that he still didn't trust or believe his own data.
For what reason would a scientist impugn his own research AFTER he was proven to be about the only one who got it right?
Because to a Democrat and a strong Hillary supporter, and a Dane to boot, the fact that the only explanation is voter fraud of such a magnitude, is unthinkable.
There is no other explanation.
They are bearing false witness by continuing to pass on ANY information from CNN, much less their completely discredited presidential poll.
OFFICIALLY, Trump got 32% more of the electoral votes than Hillary (306 vs. 232).
BUT, this doesn't even include another 13 million voters which will soon be proven to be a result of voter fraud. If they were all Hillary voters, this would reduce her vote count by 20%, to 185. This would give Trump a lead of 66%.
No Hillary supporter EVER wants to even THINK about that PROBABILITY.
VOTE FRAUD IN ACTION!!!
LOOK at the few counties in the nation who supported Gore. It is an IMPOSSIBLE scenario that Bush carried 2,434 of the least populous counties and that Gore gained a majority of the "popular vote" by carrying only 677 of the most populous counties.
There is NO REASON for there to be such a big difference of opinion between large and small counties, or populous and non-populous counties. The ONLY explanation for it is that key counties were targeted for vote FRAUD!
The Criminal Gallup Organization
The Gallup Organization is yet one more mainstream media source which is controlled by and/or advancing the cause of liberals/feminists/jews/nwo
In the last fifty years, their "polls" have consistently underestimated public support for Republicans and overestimated public support for Democrats--a fact of life which should be anathema to putative statisticians. They estimated that Clinton would get 49% of the 1992 vote, but he got only 43.2%, an over-representation of 5.8%. They estimated that Reagan would get only 47% of the 1980 vote, but he got 59.1%, an under-representation of 3.8%. Overall in the last fifty years this consistent media bias has added up to underestimating Republicans by 4.6% and overestimating Democrats by 7.3%, which is an 11.9% difference. Yet Gallup proclaims that their polls are accurate to within plus or minus 2%--a claim which constitutes nothing less than consumer fraud.
By chronically misrepresenting American mainstream opinion by this much, and by putting their own opinions on a higher priority than the facts, Gallup has become a pawn if not a leader in the destruction of American politics. Their polls are cited by many American publications, which misleads entire segments of American voters.
The Criminal Computerized Vote Count
Democrats made a big play BEFORE the election, when they thought that they would win the electoral college vote but lose the popular vote, that they adamantly supported the electoral college. IMMEDIATELY after they discover that it's the REPUBLICANS who found themselves in the category--they instantly demanded a resolution to disband the electoral college. This is amazingly hypocritical.
It was DEMOCRATS who supported the computerized vote counting BEFORE the election (probably because this gave them the greatest opportunity for vote fraud), but now AFTER the election they want a hand count??!! What do they know that we don't know? Do they know that the computerized count is flawed by that much? Or does this just give them another shot at vote fraud? Not even Democrats believe their claims that their own constituents are stupider than 8 year olds when it comes to figuring out how to vote.
Let's take them at their word. Let's assume that computerized vote counting IS flawed. Let's assume that the hand count being done right now turns out different from the computerized count? WHICH one is valid? If they claim that the hand count which favors them is the only valid count, THEN what? If it was flawed in Palm Beach, then it was flawed in Orlando, and there must be a recount there to make up for the flawed computerized count. And then there must be a hand count in ALL of Florida. And then there must be a hand count in the ENTIRE US. And then EVERY election in this country which EVER used computerized vote counting MUST be declared invalid.
Of course, the Democrats will claim that voting laws apply only to their opponents but never to themselves. They KNOW how corruptible our courts are now, which is the ONLY reason they're willing to take the vote away from both the voters and the electoral college and hand it over to judges. But once they started this process, the sky was the limit on BOTH sides. We might discover that the man who was shot in Dallas wasn't even the real president after all. It could EASILY be established that the real president during that assassination was Richard Nixon (who lost an equally close election and didn't complain). Can you imagine Richard Nixon being declared a more honorable man than our current Vice President?
Maybe the rapist in the White House is just a plain rapist, and not a presidential rapist.
No matter how this turns out, this strategy STINKS to High Heaven. We would be better off digging up Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin and George Washington and drag their bodies down Pennsylvania Avenue rather than letting this slut Gore get away with this.
Gore deserves a LONG prison term, not mere censure or rebuke or infamy.
Why do they do this? Votescam has the answer:
Prejudice -- To decide beforehand; to lean in one favor of one side of a cause for some reason or other than it's justice. Reference: Bouvier's 8th -- 1859
Do The Math: Election Returns Don't Add Up By James Collier
The seeds for the rigging of 1996 primaries were planted in 1964 when, within months of the JFK assassination, a power frenzy was unleashed in Washington. The CIA, FBI and the nation's most powerful media heads met in secret. The media agreed not to challenge the Warren Commission's preposterous conclusion that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman. In return, the media gained the right to be the official vote-counting apparatus for presidential elections. This incident was doc- documented in reports from the Air Force Staff College and American University. The deal was struck and News Election Services (NES) was founded. Today, that network pool of NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, AP, the New York Times, Washington Post and others has a tote-board at 225 W. 34th St. in New York City. When Brokaw, Jennings, Rather and CNN tell the public on election night, at 7:01 pm EST, "We are the first with the most," they all lie. Just like Pravda, they get the same numbers from the NES board. The networks also own the exit-polling unit, Voter Research and Survey (VRS). That allows them to announce who won the presidency at 7:01 p.m., before a single vote is counted. The numbers do not change, and are always 100 percent correct. NES merged with VRS and is now known as Voter News Service (VNS). The networks want us to believe that people vote in the same percentages in every precinct across the country. Thus, an exit poll in Maine is representative of us all. Once that one magic precinct in Maine votes, the remainder of the country may just as well have stayed home, because the numbers will not change from coast to coast. Against this backdrop, we now examine a few curious events that took place during this primary season. Iowa -The media told us at 6:55 p.m. on the evening of the Iowa caucuses that it knew the final vote totals based on "entrance polls' " Not a single vote had been cast (unlike a regular primary, voting starts not in the morning but at 7 p.m.)
People were still parking their cars, and witnesses reported that nobody filled out entrance polls. The paper ballot vote started sometime after 7 p.m. Sen. Bob Dole won. The next day the Iowa papers ran the VNS totals. Observers noticed that Pat Buchanan's vote was shaved by 100 to 150 votes per county from what they knew he received the night before, and they called county election supervisors to ask: "When is the election going to be certified?" The answer: "We don't know, maybe in April... the media hasn't told us yet." Election supervisors had told precinct captains to "throw away your totals, we aren't officially recording them this year.. the media will tell us what the totals are" And that's how you rig a paper-ballot election. Arizona- VNS projected Buchanan the winner, but Steve Forbes won. The next day the networks apologized for the first time since the consortium was formed. They said their exit poll must have been wrong. Here's what our investigation has thus far uncovered: Sometime during the after- noon in Maricopa County (Phoenix), ballot boxes were removed by people claiming to be from the Election Supervisor's Office. "We need to get a jump on the vote count," the precinct workers were told. New boxes were already in place. No questions were asked. Also, roughly 219,000 voters (out of 1.2 million registered) were issued plastic laminated vote cards that were punched when they voted, so that nobody could vote twice on the same card. However, it seems that 60,000 additional cards were issued to "special" voters who were heard bragging in vote lines that they could vote twice without being caught. The election supervisor's office in Maricopa County issued a report stating that only two of the 60,000 extra ballots were voted. According to Yvonne Reed, assistant county recorder, 10 people were hired after the election to hand record 219,000 seven- digit voter ID numbers into a computer. Reed said the computer showed that only two voters had their numbers entered twice, and those votes were dropped from the total. The 10 employees worked three 12- hour days, with two half-hour breaks, Reed said. Do the math: Roughly 220,000 cards divided by 10 workers equals about 22,000 cards. Multiply 22,000 cards by 7 digits in each card and you get 154,000 digits. That means each worker entered about 50,000 digits a day. There are 60 minutes in an hour. To accomplish the task, one would have to enter more than 4,000 digits an hour non- stop for 12 hours a day, or more than one keyboard strike per second. Unlikely, to say the least. Reed refused to give the name of the 10 people. She said it was not public information. "Yes it is," I said. "They were paid with taxpayers' dollars." A citizen's investigation is pending.
It seems that 60,000 additional cards were issued to "special" voters who were heard bragging in vote lines that they could vote twice without being caught.
WHO COUNTS THE AMERICAN VOTE?
Bullet Sales up 900%!!
Received: from rly-yg04.mx.aol.com (rly-yg04.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.4]) by air-yg02.mail.aol.com (v76_r1.23) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 07:13:09 -0500
Received: from hn.egroups.com (hn.egroups.com [126.96.36.199]) by rly-yg04.mx.aol.com (v76_r1.19) with ESMTP; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 07:12:43 -0400
Received: from [10.1.10.37] by hn.egroups.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2000 12:12:38 -0000
Received: (EGP: mail-6_2_1); 12 Nov 2000 12:12:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 24178 invoked from network); 12 Nov 2000 12:12:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (10.1.10.27) by m3.onelist.org with QMQP; 12 Nov 2000 12:12:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web10708.mail.yahoo.com) (188.8.131.52) by mta2 with SMTP; 12 Nov 2000 12:12:37 -0000
Received: from [184.108.40.206] by web10708.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 12 Nov 2000 04:12:37 PST
From: wilford bates email@example.com
Mailing-List: list firstname.lastname@example.org; contact email@example.com
Delivered-To: mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 04:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [TheEagle-L] Fwd: While Gore supporters are holding protests in the streets, Bush supporters are buying bullets ...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
While Gore supporters are holding protests in the streets, Bush supporters
are buying bullets at gun shops. In the three days since the U.S. General
Election, ammunition sales throughout the United States have jumped an
astonishing nine-hundred percent (900%). Americans are furious over massive,
blatant and widespread vote fraud by supporters of Al Gore and many are
openly talking about "blood in the streets."
Voter fraud in Tuesdays general election has Radio Talk Shows throughout
the United States burning up with callers who are openly speaking about
civil insurrection, blood in he streets, state secession from the Union and
wondering aloud whether President Bill Clinton will use this election
debacle as an excuse to remain in power after his term expires on January
Such talk is not limited to fanatics; U.S. Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX),
lent credibility to the prospects of violence when he was asked tonight on
radio station WBCQ if President Clinton would use this situation to remain
in power. Responding to that query, Rep. Paul stated "Six months ago, I
thought the idea was preposterous. Now I'm not so sure. The people would
come out and there would be total violence."
Here's a brief list of just some of the fraud:
Tens of thousands of U.S. Military personnel around the world were unable
to cast ballots for the first time in US History because their Military
Absentee ballots "got lost in the mail." In past elections, the Military
voted 9:1 in favor of Republicans.
Thousands of non-US Citizens - who cannot legally vote - were sent
letters by President Bill Clinton just days before the election, informing
them they had registered, and even providing them with Voter Identification
Cards to sign and use when voting! These mailings were sent to states with
large Latino populations such as California, possibly allowing enough
non-citizens to vote and sway the election.
In New York City, voting machines were tampered with, disabling the
Republican voting levers. When voters came out of the malfunctioning voting
booths and sought a paper ballot, it let polling workers know the voter was
going to vote Republican because those were the only levers that weren't
working. A television news crew caught Democrat vote counters in Brooklyn,
New York throwing thousands of paper ballots into garbage dumpsters -
resulting in thousands of Republican votes disappearing.
Also in New York, registered Republican voters were told in hundreds of
polling places they were no longer registered to vote. Those persons were
offered a paper "provisional ballot" but when those ballots were filled out,
Poll workers refused to place the Ballots in a locked box.
In the Albuquerque, New Mexico area, computerized voting machines were
reprogrammed so that votes were not counted whenever anyone cast ballots for
all candidates from the same political party! Upwards of 68,000 votes may
have been reprogrammed out of existence.
In Michigan, Gore campaign workers were paying drunks and homeless hobos
with cigarettes if those people would register to vote and cast a ballot for
In Missouri, polling places in heavy Democrat areas remained open up to
four hours after the legal time, allowing those Democrats to cast ballots.
In New Jersey, hundreds of voters in urban Democrat areas like Hudson and
Essex County, were jammed into the hallways at the County Boards of
Elections, casting absentee or provisional ballots hours after the polls
The media a willing participant
Just minutes after voting places on the east coast closed, major news
networks began "calling' the race. But when the networks "called" Florida as
being won by Al Gore, they did so despite the fact that a portion of that
state is in the Central time zone and those polling places were still open.
These premature "call" of Florida by the media caused tens-of-thousands
of voters in the affluent Republican area of the Florida panhandle, to leave
polling places without voting because they thought Gore had already won.
Florida is now the key state in the Presidential race.
False Claims of fraud in Palm Beach County, Florida Democrats have been
complaining wildly about alleged fraud in Palm Beach County, Florida, where
19,000 ballots were allegedly discarded because voters punched ballots for
two Presidential candidates. Punching the ballot for two Presidential
candidates automatically voids the ballot.
But it is now surfacing that many or most of the 19,000 discarded ballots
were, in fact, lawfully and properly replaced when voters who made the
mistake came out of the voting booth, requested and received replacement
ballots then cast a proper vote!
Leftist Gore supporters and the media are ignoring this fact, spurring
outrage by conservatives that the truth is being suppressed and causing
minorities in that county to take to the to the streets demanding a re-vote.
Such a re-vote is not only illegal under Florida law, it is also illegal
under federal law. (3 U.S.C. 1)
Putting this in perspective, even if the 19,000 votes were all discarded
and not counted, those votes would only represent four percent (4%) of the
total votes cast in that County, meaning ninety-six percent of the other
voters in the County did it correctly.
As a result of all this election fraud, Bush supporters are convinced
that Gore, with Clinton's help, is stealing the US Presidential election.
Bush supporters are going to gun stores in large numbers and buying large
amounts of ammunition for their guns. Many are openly saying they will not
allow Al Gore to steal the election and are calling those who support Gore
Not since the early 1860's prior to the Civil War has the US population
been so divided and openly talking about violent civil warfare. Radio
callers are making unprecedented open and public calls to employ the Second
Amendment (right to keep and bear arms) to protect the integrity of the
Constitution and of the Bush election.
This election has pitted brother against brother, parent against child,
young against old, white against black, Gentile against Jew. The anger is
palatable and the situation grows steadily worse.