At 80 years old, Dr. Watson, is as good as he ever was at manipulating the jewsmedia, with the following article being an excellent example of how he can communicate with those who understand his research, through the jewsmedia which clearly does NOT and NEVER will, thus successfully preventing them from blocking his message.
By agreeing that 1) He doesn't know whether or not blacks are less intelligent than Whites just because their average IQ is 40 points lower, and 2) Pretending that "It was very surprising ... for Jim [that 16 of his 30,000 genes were similar to a 'black ancestor of African descent'", he mocked the entire racist jewsmedia "establishment" which was so "shocked" at his "racism" that they demanded he be ousted after 30 years in his post. Their complete and total failure to understand what he was saying produced his greatest and most revealing and most poignant article ever:
It proves precisely what he's been saying for 30 years, which is that those with IQ's of 70 are too STUPID to even begin to ask the right questions, much less comprehend his answers.
It proves that White genes are AT LEAST .9994667 pure.
It proves Dr. Watson is more closely related to the ground worm than an African.
It proves that not even jews and blacks believe the "out of Africa" theory. Rather than "European genes" being .9999667 pure, they would have to be .9999667 "black ancestor[s] of African descent". in order for this "out of Africa theory" to be valid.
Webster's New World Dictionary:
I.Q. = intelligence quotient, a number indicating a person's level of intelligence: it is the mental age (as shown by intelligence tests) multiplied by 100 and divided by the chronological age.
Can there be a greater proof of the lack of intelligence of blacks than to deny that having low IQ's means they're less intelligent?
Human and ground worm genome are .666 similar
There are 30,000 genes in the human genome and 20,000 in the round worm genome, making, in jewsmedia lexicon, Dr. Watson and ground worms .666 similar. Conversely, if Europeans have "at most 1 gene" which is supposedly from "a black ancestor of African descent", then the European gene is at LEAST .9999667 pure [five 9's pure], meaning there is almost NO African gene in the European gene pool today.
IF 15 additional of Dr. Watson's genes ARE actually from a "black ancestor of African descent", then he's "only" .9994667 pure [three 9's pure], a difference of 0.0005, a VERY high degree of purity even IF we agree that this is proof of an African ancestor [which of course we cannot, for practical as well as scientific reasons].
The difference between Dr. Watson's genes and African genes is 13,332 TIMES greater than the difference between Dr. Watson's genes and ground worm genes. This is THEIR OWN "logic". If it WAS true that Dr. Watson "had a great-grandparent who was African", then his IQ would have been closer to 70 than to the level required for admission to our universities at the time that he got his degrees--this was prior to affirmative action. There are four reasons this is not practical and why those who actually believe this have made fools of themselves, not Dr. Watson, not DNA studies, and maybe not even deCODE Genetics:
In White societies even in the US, no self-respecting White would marry someone with a great-grandparent who was black, no matter how "white" they might have appeared.
By the laws in place at the time Dr. Watson's great-grand parents married, miscegenation with blacks was ILLEGAL.
Not even today in actual White societies could it be possible to conceal a black great-grandparent from a great-grandchild.
He could not have completed the research he did if he'd had an IQ of 70, as those with "black [great-grandparents] of African descent" do.
Those who claim Dr. Watson with .9994667 European genes, is "part black" are the real RACISTS. But they're also IDIOTS, because they also ACCEPT the presumption that having African genes even IMPLIES having a black ancestor. They also tacitly admit that they know that even being .9994667 is NOT acceptable under God's Law, which requires 100% GENETIC PURITY:
A mamzer shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD, Deuteronomy 23:2
Every human today (except "Israelis" whose "mother is my sister") can count back in their own genealogy to discover they have 2,048 ancestors at the tenth generation. 16 genes out of 30,000 genes is 1 out of 1,875 genes, in the same range as "Even to the tenth generation". Some claim that when the DNA is impure by "only" one part out of 2,048, intermarriage is then permissible. But this is a Hebraism which means FOREVER, which means that IF 1 out of every 1,875 of Dr. Watson's genes IS from a black ancestor, he's no longer an heir to God's Everlasting Covenant.
It's a complete and total fraud to presume that sharing either 1 or 16 genes with "black ancestors" even *implies* miscegenation with blacks, because every gene has the potential to have been associated with other species with which we know it was impossible to miscegenate. Many if not most of the 20,000 genes in the simple ground worm are identical to those in Dr. Watson's genome, yet we know that none of them are the result of miscegenation of Dr. Watson's ancestors with ground worms. Even we today understand the natural barriers God put in place to prevent such things. When Dr. Watson's genome is 13,332 TIMES more similar to a ground worm than to an African, the probability of Dr. Watson having a black ancestor is ZERO divided by 13,332, which of course is ZERO!
Why do racists jump for joy over the prospect of him having a black ancestor when confronted with PROOF that the "out of Africa theory" is IMPOSSIBLE, and that the European genome is .9999667 pure? Simply because they do not and cannot grasp simple math that "most Americans" [read: all Whites in the U.S.] can EASILY grasp.
Hallelujah, Dr. Watson!! Well done.
ps--we also can't ignore that jews control deCODE Genetics
December 10, 2007
LONDON: James Watson, the DNA pioneer who claimed Africans were less
intelligent than whites, has been found to have more genes of black
origin than most Europeans.
An analysis of Dr Watson's genome shows 16 of his genes are likely to
have come from a black ancestor of African descent. By contrast, most
people of European descent would have no more than one such gene.
The study was made possible when Dr Watson allowed his genome - the
map of all his genes - to be published on the internet in the
interests of science and research.
"This level is what you would expect in someone who had a great-
grandparent who was African," said Kari Stefansson of deCODE
Genetics, whose company carried out the analysis.
"It was very surprising to get this result for Jim."
Dr Watson won the Nobel Prize, with Francis Crick and Maurice
Wilkins, after working out the structure of DNA in 1953. However, he
provoked an outcry earlier this year when he suggested black people
were genetically less intelligent than whites.
His critics savoured the latest wry twist of fate at the weekend.
John Sulston, the Nobel laureate who helped lead the consortium that
decoded the human genome, said the discovery was ironic in view of Dr
Watson's opinions on race.
"I never did agree with Watson's remarks," he said.
"We don't understand enough about intelligence to generalise about
The backlash against Dr Watson forced him to step down as chancellor
of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York state, after 39 years at
He said he was "inherently gloomy about the prospects for Africa"
because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their
intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not
The analysis of his genome by deCODE Genetics, an Icelandic company,
shows a further nine of Dr Watson's genes are likely to have come
from an ancestor of Asian descent. Dr Watson was not available for
The Sunday Times