The Cursed Ones



This is a study to show that the Jews cannot be saved; as they are The Cursed Ones. There are many who refuse to believe in Satan; and there are ever more that believe that he exists. Many will argue that the word Satan means "an adversary" and they are right for he is an adversary to Yahweh.

Then there are those who ask, "If there is a God then why does He allow evil to be in the world." This could be answered in many ways.

1). If God had destroyed Satan and the angels that followed him; then the other beings in heaven would have served God because they feared Him, and not because they loved Him; which is what He wants most of all.

2). If God had destroyed Satan and the angels that followed him; then the other beings, because of their fear of Him would have immediately began to plot on how to overthrow Him, out of their fear. And this God did not want to happen, because that would literally destroy His creation all together.

Therefore, God had to allow Satan to run rampant on the earth, and cause men to lust after money, sex, drugs, and every other kind of immoral thing imagination.

We must remember that to us, death is the end of all things and after that we know nothing. But death is nothing to God, for He can raise people up by merely speaking to them and telling them to rise and live again. Therefore, since this is the case, He can allow all the evil things to happen on earth, and show the other beings that Satan's way is wrong and evil; So when He destroys Satan and his angels, and those who follow him on earth, then the other beings will know that God is right, and His way is just and fair.

Therefore, they will love Him because He has shown them over thousands of years and rivers of blood spilled by Satan and his children the Jews; so when they are rounded up and bundled and then thrown into the fire; the other beings will know once again that God is just and that His Laws, Statutes, and Judgments bring happiness, love and well being to all who follow them. And they will love Him with an everlasting devotion.

Let us start in the beginning. Satan, of course, was not a serpent. The thing that deceived Eve and seduced her was not a scaly thing wriggling on the ground. The Hebrew word Nachash means "enchanter" or "magician."

Serpent: Strong's Concordance: #5175  nachash (naw-khawsh'); from 5172; a snake (from its hiss): KJV-- serpent.

#5172 nachash (naw-khash'); a primitive root; properly, to hiss, i.e. WHISPER A (MAGIC) SPELL; generally, to prognosticate: KJV-- X certainly, divine, ENCHANTER, (use) X enchantment, learn by experience, X indeed, diligently observe.

A fallen angel, retaining still a lot of his angelic powers, no doubt could be very much of an enchanter and magician. Now his children, (and I mean children, not just followers) through the centuries used a serpent as a symbol or emblem of their ancestor, until finally they attached a secondary meaning of serpent of the word. But it is not in the root meaning of the word at all.

At this point many will say that an angel did not do this because there is no such thing as an angel nor a devil or Satan. Yet Christ Himself said that He saw Satan fall from heaven as lightning:

"After these things the...And he said unto them, I BEHELD SATAN AS LIGHTNING FALL FROM HEAVEN." (Luke 10:1, 18)

Thus Christ told us about Satan when he was cast out of heaven:

"And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him." (Revelation 12:9)

Then Jude tells us:

"And THE ANGELS which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day." (Jude 1:6)

The Bible was never so ridiculous as to suggest that a snake accomplished all this. In Genesis 3:1-3, you remember Satan said to Eve,

"Why, is it really true that God said, You can't eat of any tree in the Garden?"

And she replies to him, (here is how it reads in the Hebrew):

"And the woman said unto the enchanter, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the Garden,"

but (now I am quoting from the King James Version and I am going to correct it as I go)

"...of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the Garden, God has said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die."

Now let us see what it actually says in the Hebrew: "Fruit" is the Hebrew word "pirchach" meaning progeny, brood, children, descendants. Do you talk about the children of a walnut tree or an apple tree? Of course you don't.

Now, of the pirchach, of the descendants, of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God has said, "Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it." And that word "touch" is the Hebrew word "naqa" which is a more polite expression, meaning, "to have sexual intercourse with." Do you need to be warned not to have sexual intercourse with an apple? Of course not. It isn't that kind of tree.

God had millions of the pre-Adamic Asiatic and African peoples around; if he just wanted somebody wide between the shoulders and narrow between the eyes, to spade up the Garden, he had them.

He didn't have to create a special being for that. Satan had been the Governor of this Planet until he forfeited the right to it by rebellion. God sent Adam here (and you remember that the last verse in the third chapter of the Gospel of Luke tells you that Adam was the Son of God: it doesn't say that about any of these pre-Adamic peoples mentioned in Genesis chapter 1. (See the books: Pre-Adamites; A book entitled, "Preadmites," or a demonstration of the Existence of Men Before Adam; together with a study of their condition antiquity, and Racial Affinities, and Progressive Dispersion Over the Earth, by Alexander Winchell, LL. D., and published by S.C. Griggs and Company, London: 1880, which contains 500 pages. Another book entitled, "Adam and The Adamite" or, The Harmony of Scripture and Ethnology by Dominick Meausland, Q.C. LL. D., London: Richard Bentley, New Burlington St. England 1864)

Adam was the son of God and God created Adam here to carry out His will and to take over by force, kick Satan out and govern this Planet.

Adam and Eve were not supposed to intermingle with these people. If these Negroes and Mongoloids were all that God wanted, He already had them. What He created was a different and separate being to have a different sort of person, which the Mongoloids and the Negroids could never produce.

Such a being was to "till" the ground; this the races God created BEFORE Adam and Eve never did. First God told us:

"And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground." (Genesis 2:5)

Then He said:

"Therefore the LORD God SENT HIM FORTH FROM THE GARDEN OF EDEN, TO TILL THE GROUND FROM WHENCE HE WAS TAKEN." (Genesis 3:23)

The Hebrew word "Awdawm," which we translate Adam, means "of a rosy, fair complexion." Adam was the first person of a specifically created new race. Adam and Eve were told,

"To not mongrelize your race, with these pre-Adamite peoples in the world."

This was what God meant when He told Adam and Eve:

"And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil." (Genesis 2:9)

God told Adam that he could eat of every tree of the garden, except the tree of knowledge of good and evil:

"And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of THE TREE OF THE KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL, THOU SHALT NOT EAT OF IT: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die."(Genesis 2:16-17)

Now when you come to Genesis 3:13 God has called Adam, Eve and Satan before Him to give an accounting of their misdeeds; and according to your King James Version, Eve says,

"The serpent beguiled me, and I did eat thereof."

Here again is the Hebrew word Nachash meaning enchanter, but instead of "beguiled" the Hebrew word "nawshaw" means "seduced." Now "beguiled" is no more than "deceived."

Somebody who sells you some mining stock, in a mine that doesn't have any good ore in it, beguiles you; but this word means "seduced." And Yahweh God said unto the woman said, "The enchanter seduced me." That is what it says in the Hebrew, and Cain was the product thereof. So in reply, in Genesis 3:15 God says (speaking to Satan):

"I will put enmity between thee (Satan) and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed."

Now the same Hebrew word, "zehra," literally meaning "seed" (and it could be used as grains of wheat for example, but it is used throughout the Bible as meaning the descendants of a person too; children, (posterity), between Satan's seed (zehra) and the woman's seed (zehra). In other words Satan was to have just as literal "children" in this world as was Eve, because the very same word with the very same meaning is used for it.

Serpent

"Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he {serpent} said unto the woman {Eve}, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden." (Genesis 3:1)

(1) Snakes are to be feared, and it is not abnormal to fear them. To prove that even such Godly men as Moses were/are afraid of snakes, we present the following from the Book of Exodus. We begin with Moses standing before the burning bush:

"...the Lord said unto him, What is that in thine hand? And he {Moses} said, A rod. And He {God} said, Cast it on the ground. And he cast it on the ground, and it became a serpent; and Moses Fled from before it." (Exodus 4:2-3)

(2) So we can see that even Moses fled before a serpent/snake! It scared him and he fled from it. Because man has a natural fear of them.

Yet here in Genesis Chapter Three, we have Eve having a discourse with a serpent/snake! With no fear. I do not believe it for a minute. I don't know about you, but I do not believe that Eve was having a conversation with a literal snake! Not for a minute. That is simply to far- fetched to be believed literally.

(3) If a snake had come up to Eve she would have ran for Adam to protect her from it. She would not have simply stood or sat there and had a casual conversation with it. No! A thousand times No!!! She would not have just sat there and said: "Hello how are you?" or some such nonsense. She simply would not have done that at all.

(4) Serpent is a strange word when we look at it in the scriptures. It is translated from many different words, but it is used 38 times in the Old Testament. And is translated, basically, from four different words.

But let's only deal with one #5175 in Strong's Concordance. It appears 31 times and every time it is translated serpent. Now keep in mind there are three other words that are also translated serpent in the Scriptures. And the total words are used some 71 times in all the Scriptures. 38 times as serpent and about 24 times as dragons.

(5) What is a dragon, you ask. Well this presentation is about serpents not dragons and to get into a long discussion about dragons would take us away from our intended subject. So we shall leave that for others to contemplate. This is because we have a problem here in Genesis 3:1 with Eve talking with this thing called a serpent.

(6) Now the scriptures say the serpent was more subtil. Well what does this word mean. To arrive at a proper answer we will turn to Strong's Concordance again. Which says the word "serpent" is "Nachas" or "naw-khawsh" (#5175). Which is a non- Israelite name according to (#5176) -- "Nachash;" the same as #5175; the name of two persons appar. non-Isr.

It also means according to #5175 a snake (from its hiss): serpent. From the #5172 which means to hiss, i.e. whisper a (magic) spell; gen. to prognosticate -- enchanter, learn by experience, diligently observe.

(7) Also, we find the following from the Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1300: 1. A snake, esp. a large or poisonous one. 2. A sly, sneaking, treacherous person. 3. Bible Satan, in the form he assumed to tempt Eve. 4. Music an obsolete, coiled, brass wind instrument of wood covered with leather. The American Dictionary of the English Language, by Noah Webster 1828, Facsimile First Edition, published by the Foundation For American Christian Education relates that serpent means among others: a subtil or malicious person.

(8) The word prognosticate means to: 1. To foretell or predict, esp. from signs or indications. 2. To indicate beforehand. (Second College Edition, New World Dictionary of the American Language, p. 1135) The 1828 American Dictionary relates: 1. To foreshow; to indicate a future event by present signs. A clear sky at sunset prognosticates a fair day. 2. To foretell by means of present signs; to predict. "I neither will nor can prognosticate To the young gaping heir his father's fate." So now we can see that the word "nachash" is linked to foretelling things. Or its linked to witchcraft (whisper a magic spell) and humanism. It's linked to anything, other than the Word of God.

(9) Now let's look again at this word serpent, and we will see that every time it appears in the Bible, it does not mean a serpent/snake. That sometimes it means either a person or a nation. For example when Jacob/Israel was relating the gifts which were given to the various tribes of Israel we find the following: "Dan shall be a Serpent by the way, an Adder {snake} in the path, that biteth the horse heels..." (Genesis 49:17)

(10) Is someone going to try to convince us that Dan was to become a snake. I don't think so. Do you? It is merely a figure of speech. It means that the tribe of Dan would, or the people of the tribe of Dan would display the attributes of being sly, cunning, deceitful.

(11) The wicked are described as serpents/snakes:

"The Wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a Serpent: They are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear." (Psalm 58:3-4)

(12) Evil and violent men are described as serpents:

"Deliver me, O Lord, from The Evil Man: preserve me from The Violent Man; Which imagine mischiefs in their heart; continually are they gathered together for war. They have sharpened their tongues Like A Serpent; Adders' poison is under their lips. Selah." (Psalm 140:1-3)

Thus we can see by these verses, anyone who is evil or wicked is described as being a serpent or snake.

(13) Now let's examine nations because they are also very important to this presentation. Turn to the Book of Isaiah where we find:

"In that day the Lord with His sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing Serpent, even leviathan that crooked Serpent; and He shall slay the dragon that is in the sea." (Isaiah 27:1)

(14) We see here that the Leviathan is a crooked and piercing serpent. It appears this is an allegory, talking about the enemies of Israel.

(15) The nations that came against Israel are compared to this thing which is also described as a serpent. And it appears that this would be a reference to the Grecian, Turkish and Roman Empires of that day. This is generally accepted when one looks at the narratives of the Bible.

(16) Now let's look at Jeremiah 8:17 for another:

"For, behold, I will send Serpents, cockatrices, among you, which will not be charmed, and they shall bite you, saith the Lord."

(17) Here again we are not talking about actual serpents/snakes. Not at all. We are talking about nations which will becoming against Israel. They will not be charmed and they will bite you. At this point some will ask what do you mean they will not be charmed.

(18) For an answer turn to the Book of Second Kings Chapter Seventeen we find Assyria came against what was left of Israel, and they told the Assyrians they would pay them a ransom if they would not come in and harm them. That's charming them is it not?  But if they will not be charmed, then they will not accept their money, gold, silver or other valuables. They will come in and bite you and destroy you. That is what Jeremiah is telling them. So we can clearly see, They are not Serpents at all, they are the enemy of Israel, who will come against them.

(19) There is another like story in Amos 9:3 and another in Isaiah 14:29. Those are good stories and you should read them very carefully.

(20) We find allegories being used all through the Scriptures. No one has a problem with Judah being called a lion's whelp (Genesis 49:9); Zebulun as a foal and an ass's colt (Genesis 49:11); Issachar as a strong ass (Genesis 49:14); Naphtali as a hind {A red deer -- one that is fully grown} (Genesis 49:21); Joseph as a bough {branch or limb of a tree} (Genesis 49:22); Benjamin as a wolf (Genesis 49:27); All the tribes as a lion (Numbers 23:24; 24:9); Gad as a lion (Deuteronomy 33:20); Dan as a lion's whelp (Deuteronomy 33:22); Jesus as a Lamb (Throughout the Book of Revelation); Israel as a speckled bird (Jeremiah 12:9); A nation of the East as a ravenous bird (Isaiah 46:11); Preachers as fishers (Jeremiah 16:16); Pharaoh King of Egypt as a young lion and a whale (Ezekiel 32:2) and Herod as a fox. (Luke 13:32) When the word "lion" is used for Judah, we are trying to really emphasize the strength of Judah. And when we use the word "serpent" we think of something sly, wicked, evil, cunning, something that hides from us, has venom, that is strong and dangerous. And that is why the word serpent is used many times as an allegory in the Scriptures.

(21) There are many more allegories which could be presented but we believe this should suffice. Was any of these men such an animal or thing? Of course not! It is simply a description of the characteristics of these separate individuals.

(22) Then we have the false doctrine of the Pharisees, Sadducees and Herod described as Leaven. (Matthew 16:12)

(23) Thus we can clearly see that it is not at all unusual for a word to be used to illustrate something more impressively. And that is what we are talking about.
    
(24) Most Christians do not have any trouble with any of these in the various verses of Scriptures until we get to Genesis 3:1. For example if we go a little further we find: "...thou shalt bruise His heel." Everyone knows that Scripture. And we find another one "...It shall bruise thy head..." and no one has any problem relating that to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and the evil one {which most people believe to be Satan}. Nobody has a problem with that.

(25) Then: Why is it a problem when someone comes along and says The Serpent is not a Snake! To some people that is a real problem: They want that Serpent to be a Snake!!! And they will scream and rant like a spoiled child if someone disagrees with them.

(26) In our opinion that Serpent never was a Snake! In my opinion that serpent was a live flesh and blood person. In my opinion it was no spiritual being, and that is not meant to refute the Satan doctrine at all. We are simply saying that this thing we had in the flesh, in the body, in the Garden of Eden, was not an invisible, negative entity. It was not a Snake that walked on two feet. It was a humanoid. Just like you and I.

(27) Let's look at some of the characteristics of this particular serpent in Chapter Three Verse One. One of the things we know, is that it is more wise than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. Is that not what it says? There word is subtil but we will deal with that a little later.

(28) What is wisdom a trait of? Can you show us any animal in the animal kingdom which can be wise, that can be sly, that can be crafty? They only do what they do by instinct, they do not do it from reason. No animal operates from reason.

(29) Now one can condition response them, by exposing them to altering good with bad conditions depending upon what they do in response to the stimuli given them. But that is merely training them, that is not teaching them wisdom, that is not teaching them to reason.

(30) Oh, the experiments with monkeys, where some scientists say they have taught a monkey to talk; but again that is only the animal being taught to make certain sounds as a result of varying stimuli given them. That is not the same thing. That is not the same thing as being born with the ability to think and reason.

(31) Another thing about this serpent that everybody agrees upon, is that it walked erect like a man. This is a natural human trait. It is not the natural reaction or trait of any animal, much less a snake. You cannot find this ability in snakes.

(32) They do not stand up. Oh there may be some species which have small legs or the semblance of legs but more than likely, if the scientists would be honest, they are a species of lizard and not a specie of snake. There are some snakes which can raise their heads up quite a bit, but still, they cannot stand erect.

(33) It has been said that apes are a form of the erectus, but that is simply not true. They spend most of their time moving about on both their (hands) and feet. Oh they can stand erect for short periods of time but their natural position is on all fours. And even when they are standing erect they are bent over, they have a slight hump to their back because that is not their normal stance.

(34) And besides that, can you imagine Eve standing or sitting in the Garden of Eden and a great harry ape suddenly dropping out of a tree beside her and speaking to her. She would have been gone like a bolt of lightening. She would not have stayed there with such an animal.

(35) Now the third thing about this serpent was the ability to talk. To speak like a man. Well things are getting worse all the time for those who want that serpent to be a snake. There has Never been a snake with the ability to talk -- not then and not now, nor at any time in the foreseeable future. They simply cannot do so.

They do not even have any vocal cords. Oh some will say what about the ass which spoke to Balaam. Well let's look at it for just a moment.

"And Balaam rose up in the morning, and saddled his Ass, and went with the princes of Moab. And God's anger was kindled because he went: and the Angel of the Lord stood in the way for an adversary against him. Now he was riding upon his Ass, and his two servants were with him. And the ass saw the Angel of the Lord standing in the way..." (Numbers 22:21-23)

(36) According to Strong's Concordance the word "ass" or "attuwn" #860 which is the same as "eythan" or "ethan" which means: "from an unused root (mean, to continue); permanence; hence (coner) permanent; spec. A Chieftain: hard, mighty, rough, strength, strong."

(37) So Balaam was riding upon a strong Chieftain. Not a Jackass as we know. We also find that the word "ass" can also mean a #2544 "chamowr" or "Canaanite." As black men were used to carry burdens and people in ancient times; and some of the Canaanites were black, it is quite possible that Balaam was being carried by a strong black Canaanite Chieftain. Which would explain the "ass'" ability to talk.

(38) Now if we are going to attribute the talking in Genesis Chapter Three of a snake, then it would appear that in this respect Satan has more power than God in that he was able to make a serpent, who has no vocal cords, nor any organs capable of making or forming words, speak.

(39) The fourth thing about this serpent, was his gift of reason; which is expressed by his statement "...hath God said." That's reasoning. That's questioning. That's showing an ability to think, to reason. Thus, the serpent had four attributes:

(1) He was wiser {more subtil} than any beast of the field,
(2) He could walk erect,
(3) He could speak, and
(4) He had the ability to think and to reason.

(40) One does not find those things in snakes: Not then and not now. THOSE TRAITS CANNOT BE FOUND IN ANY ANIMAL OR SNAKE WHICH HAS EVER EXISTED UPON THE FACE OF THE EARTH. THEY ARE FOUND, ONLY IN WHAT WE CALL TODAY, THE HUMANOID SPECIES.

(41) Then there is the problem of a snake or an ape coming up to Eve and speaking to her without her running away. It is simply more than we can accept. It could not, it did not happen that way. But he was, whatever he was, more cunning and wiser than any beast of the field. Or any other species of beast.

(42) We can solve all these problems if we recognize that Adam and Eve were the first of the White Race {which we will explain later}. Which would not preclude the existence of other so-called humanoids existing along with them. With this, the problem simply goes away. It does not exist any more, because it would make it possible for another humanoid to exist at the same time as Adam and Eve.

This would also make it possible for someone to appear before Eve and not frighten her away. Because she has seen him before, and has probably talked to him before. It would not be a mystery to her, it would be no surprise either.

(43) Suppose that Adam and Eve were the only two people in the whole world and Eve walks around a tree and there is someone there. And it's not Adam! What is she going to do. She is going to scream for Adam and tell him; Adam you are not going to believe what I have found. She would be concerned. No matter what it was, unless it was someone she had seen before.

(44) Now if we assume that the serpent is another humanoid and not a snake, then the problem goes away. Because the other races of the world can walk, talk, think, reason and have wisdom.

The only thing left is what does the word "subtil" mean. Once again let's turn to Strong's Concordance for an explanation. It is #6175 "aruwm" or "aw-room" and means: cunning (usually in a bad sense), crafty, prudent, subtil. This word "aruwm" has been translated only one time as subtil (Genesis 3:1) and the other ten times it has been translated as crafty or prudent.

(45) Webster's gives a little different spelling, it spells "subtil" as "subtle" and gives the following definitions:

(1) Thin, rare; tenuous; not dense or heavy [a subtle gas].
(2) a) Capable of making or noticing fine distinctions in meaning, etc. [a subtle thinker].
b) Marked by or requiring mental keenness [subtle reasoning].
(3) Delicately skillful or clever; deft or ingenious [a subtle filigree].
(4) Not open or direct; crafty; sly.
(5) Delicately suggestive; not grossly obvious [a subtle hint].
(6) Working insidiously; not easily detected [a subtle poison]. (New World Dictionary of the American Language, Second College Edition, p. 1420-21)

(46) Webster's 1828 Christian Dictionary gives the following:

(1) Thin; not dense or gross; as subtil air; subtil vapor; a subtil medium.
(2) Nice; fine; delicate. "I do distinguish plain Each subtil line of her immortal face."
(3) Acute; piercing; as subtil pain.
(4) Sly; artful; cunning; crafty; insinuating; as a subtil person; a subtil Adversary.
(5) Planned by art; deceitful; as a subtil scheme.
(6) Deceitful; treacherous.
(7) Refined; fine, acute; as a subtil argument.

(47) Had Eve come into an adversary situation. You bet your boots she did. She had met with a wise adversary; a deceitful and treacherous adversary.

Now the Judeo-Christian ministers say, "Oh that doesn't mean anything, because he quotes Genesis 4:1:

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain."

Now you notice, what is not said is more significant than what is said. The Bible nowhere says Adam begat Cain. Remember now, as you have read in the Old Testament, the monotonous regularity with which it always says, "And so-and-so begat whozis and whozis begat what's-his-name and what's-his-name begat somebody else," and so on. It was important to know your ancestry in those days, because you didn't get your citizenship for two box tops and a dime; you got it because your ancestors for twenty generations back were Israelites, and no other way.

So Adam knew his wife, and she conceived. Now we can tell you something, and can prove every bit of it by witnesses; we went to a movie one night and the next morning the sun rose in the East.

Now we did not say the one caused the other. We said two things happened, one of them first and the other second; and they did, but I never said they were cause and effect here.

The Bible never says there was cause and effect here either. Now if you want further proof out of this, you can go to the fifth chapter of Genesis which gives the list of Adam's descendants, and you will notice that Cain is not mentioned. Neither Cain nor Abel are mentioned among the descendants of Adam. And if you say Abel might have been omitted, because we don't know, but he was probably killed before he left any descendants of his own.

But that is not true of Cain, because the Bible traces Cain's descendants for six generations, naming them on down the line. But never once does it say that Cain was a descendant of Adam; never in any way, shape, or form or manner. The first time  it says  Adam begat a child is Genesis 5:3:

"And Adam lived 130 years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth." Not Cain.

So the Satanic blood line crept in, definitely, with Cain; possibly earlier among the pre-Adamic peoples. Now there were pre-Adamic peoples who were not necessarily Satanic.

There were some pre-Adamic people into whom the Satanic blood line came and there were even some of the descendants of Adam who probably mongrelized. In fact, it is evident that they did from the very fact that those living around Noah were wiped out by the flood because the Bible tells us that Noah was perfect in his ancestry (no mongrelization) and he was the only one left in that area who was.

That is why the mongrelized Adamites around him were drowned in the flood. The real descendants of Adam were multiplied, and then one comes to the fact of the Satanic blood line getting in there.

Remember, God had announced His purpose, that He was going to take back the world from Satanic domination, He was going to rule it according to His purposes, and He was going to rule it through His children, going down through Adam. Now, what was the obvious move on Satan's part to thwart that? Mogrelize the two blood lines, so he could sneer in God's face and say, "These are my children; and where are Yours? All these have my blood in them." And  that is exactly what he set out to do.

Genesis 6:2 says,

"The Sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all they chose."

Now you don't get the full significance of it in that translation, "the sons of God." (beni-ha-elohim, the sons of the Elohim). Now you remember the Hebrew word El (the mighty) is used as a title of God derived from it, eloa (singular) is practically always translated God or a God, and is a correct translation. And elohim is the plural, meaning gods.

In the 82nd Psalm it says,

"God standeth in the congregation of the mighty; he judgeth among the gods."

He says to them,

"I have said, Ye are gods (Elohim); and all of you are children of the most High." (Psalm 82:6)

Ferror Fenton relates this verse:

"I had said, that they seem to be Gods, And all as if Sons of the Highest; But yet you shall die as did Adam, And fall, like each one of the Great."

As you can see the King James Version just says "gods" but it is a correct translation of "the Elohim." "The sons of the Elohim saw the daughters of Awdawm that they were fair."

The Elohim are "the children" of God, and to that extent distinct from the angels, who are merely servant spirits. Now we are not given too much detail on the rebellion that took place in Heaven, but the Bible very definitely suggests that along with a number of the angels some even of the Elohim (sons of God) followed Satan into rebellion.

Some people have tried to say, since the Adamite is spoken of as the sons of God, this is merely the Adamites here. But "the sons of God saw the daughters of Adam that they were fair and took them wives of all whom they choose."

And it is written with obvious disapproval. The male descendants of Adam were not allowed by God's law to marry anyone but the daughters of Adam; so if they were marrying within their own racial line here, it couldn't have been spoken with disapproval. So the "beni-ha-elohim" are evidently of those Elohim who followed Satan into rebellion.

Go into Genesis 6:4 speaking of the same thing, and again it is botched up in the King James Version.

"There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown."

This is what it says in the Hebrew:

"There were Nephilim (the fallen ones) in the earth in those days."

They were fallen angels. That is what the Bible calls them in so many places, Jude 1:6: "And the angels which kept not their first estate..." who had fallen from Heaven and from their former powers. "When the sons of God," and it's again the beni-ha-elohim, "came in unto the daughters of Adam..." So it's the same thing.

Therefore, we have the spreading of the Satanic blood line, and the Bible in Genesis chapter 6 goes on to trace many of these descendants of the fallen angels. You find that all through Palestine, on both sides of the Jordan River, clear down into Mount Seir, the rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea where Esau and his family lived, all through there you have these various people with the Satanic blood line in them.

There are two different places, one in Isaiah, the other as in Ezekiel, where it speaks of what it calls a King or Prince, in the one case of Babylon, and the other case of Tyre; but nevertheless, it speaks of him in language which could not possibly apply to anyone except Satan; indicating therefore that at some time or other, Satan had incarnated in the form of these various kings; one king of Babylon, one king of Tyre.

Now don't think that is so impossible or unbelievable because, remember the many times that the Old Testament tells of angels appearing in very solid form. They came and talked with Abraham on several occasions; one of them, you will remember, wrestled with Jacob almost all night.

Another came when the people of Israel were about to cross the Jordan River and take over Palestine. Joshua, making a scouting trip around his camp, saw this armed man standing there in armor and with sword, and Joshua asked,

"And it came to pass, when Joshua was by Jericho, that he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, there stood a man over against him with his sword drawn in his hand: and Joshua went unto him, and said unto him, Art thou for us, or for our adversaries? And he said, Nay; but as captain of the host of the LORD am I now come..." (Joshua 5:13-15)

Turn to Isaiah 14:12-21 and note that this could not possibly apply to anyone except to Satan himself; and then, taking it out of the King James Version too,

"How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north"

Satan is saying:

"I'm going to be the ruler over Israel (God's people). I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most high."

But Yahweh God told Lucifer, the devil,

"Yet thou shalt be brought down to hell, to the sides of the pit. They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms; That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners? All the kings of the nations, even all of them, lie in glory, every one in his own house. But thou art cast out of thy grave like an abominable branch, and as the raiment of those that are slain, thrust through with a sword, that go down to the stones of the pit; as a carcass trodden under feet. Thou shalt not be joined with them in burial, because thou hast destroyed thy land, and slain thy people: the seed of evildoers shall never be renowned." (Isaiah 14:15-20)

One could not say that about any kings of Babylon. The only one who may possibly have failed to get burial and an elaborate tomb, and all that, might have been Belshazzar: but he was nothing but an incompetent drunkard, and nobody ever could say of him that he was the one who shook kingdoms, and so on. He didn't even rule Babylon. He stayed drunk.

These passages are speaking of none other than Lucifer. Note how it goes on (I am reading from the same passage, Isaiah 14:21):

"Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities."

And that word translated as "children"is from the Hebrew word "beni" (sons). So, Satan obviously was to have children who could be slaughtered, to keep them from multiplying to the point where thy would take over and rule the world. Old Testament? Sure. Now let us see what the New Testament has to say about it.

Many Judeo-Christian clergymen claim to be  Christian; so we want to call his attention to the words of Jesus Christ and see whether he is going to say Jesus Christ is a liar or mistaken, or whether he is willing to admit, perhaps, he himself was mistaken, because one cannot reconcile the two. Christ plainly, and in a number of places, says the devil has "children," not mere followers.

Remember the parable of the Tares and the Wheat (Matthew 13:25-40); He spoke of the farmer who sowed good seed in his field, and his enemy came along during the night time and sowed these poisonous weeks; the tares among the wheat; and when the farmer's servants saw the tares growing among the wheat they asked him, "Should we go and pull them up now?"

And he said,

"No, you might pull up some of the wheat with them. Let them grow together until the time of the harvest, and then the reapers will first gather the tares into bundles to be burned, and then put the wheat in my barn."

Then He explains this parable to His disciples. In Matthew 13:38-39 He says,

"The field is the world; the good seed, are the children of the kingdom (and He uses here the Greek word which is plural of 'hulos,' meaning sons - the good seed are the sons of the kingdom); but the tares are the 'children' (same Greek word, huios) of the wicked one."

So Satan has children in this world as does God.

Again, speaking to the Pharisees (who we know, were Jews), in Matthew 12:34 (The King James Version botches it up to an extent that seems to me often to be willful), Christ says,

"O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh."

But the word is not "generation" at all.

A generation is a number of people, of not too different age, living at the same time. You for example constitute one generation. He wasn't talking just about the people living then. They were not any more wicked than the generation that lived before them or the generation that lived after them.

What He said was (it's the Greek word "genema" which means "children" or "offspring"): "O children of vipers (snakes)...sure, all these centuries you Jews have used the serpent as the emblem or symbol for your ancestor. All right, taking you at your word, You children of serpents," right down the line; vipers. He knew who they were. Again Matthew 23:29-35:

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous, And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets."

And here again is that Greek word "huios."

"Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Ye serpents, ye genema (ye offspring, children) of vipers. How can ye escape the damnation of hell? That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, son of Barachias, whom you slew between the temple and the altar."

Now does the Judeo-Christian clergy say that Jesus Christ was so unjust that He was going to punish these Jews for the murder of Abel if they weren't even descendants of Cain? Of course not. He was here tracing the "children" of the serpent; the enchanter, Satan, down through the centuries, who had murdered the righteous, including all the prophets, right down the line. So He said,

"Upon you (upon this 'people') these 'descendants of the serpent, will come the responsibility for all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel even unto the blood of Zacharias."

Throughout, the Bible speaks of two seed lines (and I do not mean merely somebody who has been converted to good views or bad). The Bible makes no reference here as to what your religious point of view may be; it is talking about literal "descendants."

We read in Romans 8:16:

"The Spirit itself bears witness with our spirit, that we are the 'children' of God."

Now, the word children there; the Greek word "teknon" means one "born" a child, not adopted. Nothing is more fallacious than this church doctrine about being "adopted" children of God. You read what Paul said on this subject, and nothing in it can justify the mistranslation of that as "adoption."

He says that before the coming of Christ we were held in bondage under the law, governed strictly by the law, and he said we are just like an heir under age. He has inherited from his father, who has died, all the estate; but he is still a minor, and he is not allowed to take control of it.

He is under the control of trustees and governors, appointed guardians, appointed by his Father, until he comes of age. And Paul says, all the time he is the owner of it all, and yet he is controlled as though he is just a servant.

Now you couldn't say that about anybody who was adopted. If you take somebody else's illegitimate child and decide you are going to adopt him, is he already the owner of your property before you adopt him? Of course not. And Paul wasn't stupid enough to think he was. Only the Judeo-Christian church-men are stupid enough for that.

What Paul was talking about was the coming of age ceremony by which they marked the fact that the heir had now become of full age and his property was put into his hands to control as an adult.

So here in Romans 8:16:

"The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God"

"teknon" one born a child, not adopted.

Romans 9:26 (and he is quoting from Hosea 1:10):

"And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God"

and it is that Greek word huioi - sons. We are the born; not adopted (or converted) children of the devil, read Acts 13:8 which tells about a Jewish sorcerer, Elymas, who opposed Paul when Paul was trying to make some converts.

Then Saul (who also was called Paul) filled with the holy Ghost, set his eyes on him and said (in verse 9):

"O full of all subtility and mischief, thou 'child' of the devil (that Greek word Huois - son) thou 'son' of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?"

Paul was under no illusion, he knew them to be "children" of the devil, by perfectly legitimate ancestry, for what it's worth.

The child of a cat is another cat, isn't it? The child of a Negro is a Negro; and a child of God is what? Now he is not as wise, and he is not as powerful, and he is not as important as his Father; but nevertheless he partakes (within his limitations) of a godly nature.

And that is what the Bible tells us about; and that is exactly why we of God's people Israel are held to so much greater responsibility than other people. After all, you cannot expect a Negro to act like anything but a Negro; but a child of God is expected to act like one.

Therefore, the child of a devil is what? Another devil, isn't he? John 6:70-71 is part of a very important passage which began in this manner: Jesus asked His disciples who were all gathered there,

"Whom do men say that I am?"

and they said

"Oh some say that you are this prophet or that one who has been reincarnated and come back here."

The Christ said,

"Whom do you say that I am?"

and Peter spoke up and said,

"Thou are the Christ, the Son of the living God."

Christ then said,

"Blessed art thou, Simon, son of Jonah: because flesh and blood didn't tell you that fact: it was my Father in heaven who told you that."

And He said,

"Upon this rock (Petra, the solid bed-rock of the earth) I will found My church."

He didn't say He was going to found it on Simon Peter (Petros), a little stone. In Greek, Petros means a little stone, just barely bigger than a pebble. Was He going to found His church on a pebble that anybody could kick out from under it? No. "I will found it upon Petra," the solid bed-rock of the earth.

Remember the example He gave, the parable wherein He said one man had built his house on the sand and when the storm came along, the flood washed the sand out from under it and it collapsed; but another man built his house upon the rock (Petra - the bed-rock) and the storm beat upon it and couldn't do anything to it, because it was founded on a rock (Petra). If any of you have ever been up to Yosemite Valley and seen that enormous cliff, "El Capitan," you've seen a good example of what the Greeks meant by the word Petra.

You could build a castle on that and nothing could blow it off or wash it away. So upon this fact, that you have recognized who I am: the Christ, the Son of the Living God; upon that I will found My church, and the gates of death shall not prevail against it. John 6:70-81 says,

"Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a 'devil?' He spoke of Judas Iscariot, (a Jew; and a thief {John 12:6} the son) of Simon, for he it was that would betray him, being one of the twelve."

Our Savior was not just being vulgarly abusive and calling people names, He never did that. Oh, He denounced these Pharisees, He called them hypocrites, and they were; He wasn't abusing them with lying epithets.

They were hypocrites, and He was accurate when He called them "children" of serpents, they acknowledged the statement was true, for that was the emblem they had used from ancient times. And when He said that one of them was a devil, He wasn't being abusive, He was speaking the literal truth.

The first Epistle of John states the existence of these two seed lines. 1 John 2:29:

"If ye know that he is righteous, ye know that every one that does righteousness is born of Him."

1 John 3:2:

"Beloved, now are we the sons of God (and here we have that Greek word teknon; born child, not adopted, a born child of God)."

1 John 5:9-10:

"Whosoever is born of God does not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God."

1 John 2:23,

"Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father."

And in John 15:23, Jesus Christ Himself said,

"He that hateth ME hateth My Father also."

Now by that, he didn't mean that none of us commit any sins at all; because, if that is the case, we would not have needed the sacrifice of Christ on the stake. We do all have our sins; but you know people are divided into two classes; the ones who are only sorry because they don't get a chance to sin more, and the others who are sorry because they have sinned a little.

So what he means there, is, whoever is born of God doesn't habitually sin. So he says, in verse 10, "In this the children (that Greek word teknon), the children of God are manifest, and the children (and again it that same Greek word teknon) of the devil." Remember he has talked about us as born teknon of God, and the others as the born teknon of the devil.

1 John 3:12 says that as for those that are our brothers, not the children of Satan, that we should love them and not be as Cain. The King James Version says,

"...who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother."

So the people who have Judeo-churchanity rather than Christianity say,

"Oh well now, you know it doesn't say that he was a son, it just means that Cain was morally associated with Satan and was bad and reprobate, and so on."

As you know, different languages have their different idioms. In many languages one word may have a meaning that can only be expressed by a phrase of several English words.

Nearly everyone has a King James Version of the Bible and know that in most editions of it, some words are printed in italic and those words in italic are the words which the translators added because they thought it was necessary to give the English the same meaning that the Hebrew or the Greek had, without these added words.

The third chapter of Luke traces the genealogy of Jesus Christ, starting with Christ and running back all the way to Adam. So let us start with Luke 3:23 as it reads in the King James Version:

"And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the 'son' of Heli (but those words 'the son' are in italic showing that they were not in the Greek and the translators added them), which was the son of Matthat, (again added in italic), which was the son of Levi (in Italics), which was the son of Melchi (italics), which was the son of Janna,"

and so forth - all in italics.

You know all about these missions to the Jews; these were converted Jews. He says to them (and you can just hear the ring of sarcasm in His voice),

"If ye continue in my doctrines indeed, then you shall be my disciples; and you shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free." (John 8:31)

Immediately they bristled up at this and said, "What do you mean; make us free?" They said,

"We are Abraham's seed and we have never been in bondage to any man."

And Christ said,

"I know you are Abraham's seed" (notice  Christ said seed, not the children of Abraham). Now to anyone who knew his Bible (and of a minister it is utterly inexcusable that he does not know it: because, remember, this is the blind leading the blind into the ditch, when an ignorant Judeo-Christian minister is leading his congregation); THIS ALSO SHOWS THAT THEY WERE NOT REALLY CONVERTS TO CHRISTIANITY, BUT WERE ONLY PRETENDING TO BE CHRISTIANS AND CHRIST SHOWED THEM UP FOR WHAT THEY WERE; DECEIVERS. Who was it who could say that he was descended from Abraham and had never been in bondage to any man?

If these Jews were of any of the twelve tribes at all, they would have been in bondage the first time in Egypt, wouldn't they? If they belonged to the ten tribed northerly kingdom of Israel (and of the three tribes in Judea. It was only the city of Jerusalem and the towns immediately surround it that were not also taken into the Assyrian captivity. It was later that those in Jerusalem and the surrounding towns that were taken into the Babylonian captivity), they would have been in bondage a second time in Assyria, wouldn't they?

And if they belonged to the two tribed southern kingdom of Judah, they would have been in bondage for the second time, in Babylon, wouldn't they? And they said, "We have never been in bondage to any man," and Christ admitted the truth of that. He didn't deny it. So they were not of any of the tribes of Israel whatsoever. Now who could say that, nevertheless, 1,800 years earlier than that, Abraham was one of his ancestors - Esau? Remember Esau and Jacob were twins, born with presumably) the same blood line: but Esau married two Canaanite women in violation of God's law.

Therefore, he couldn't leave anything but mongrelized half-Satanic descendants, because among these Hittite Canaanites you had the Satanic blood line.

What the Bible tells you about Esau selling his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of lentil stew; that isn't when he lost it. That was merely a formal ceremony by which he gave up any claim to it; but he lost it when he did the thing that rendered it impossible for him to continue as the  head of the clan.

His descendants from then on would be mongrelized, half Satanic. So recognizing that he was already out of the line for leadership, he sold it for a bowl of stew. The Bible tells you that Esau and his two Canaanite wives moved down to Mount Seir, a very rugged mountain range southeast of the Dead Sea.

But Mount Seir is exactly where some of these people lived who were descendants of these fallen angels. Go back to Genesis, chapter 6, and among the people who had the blood line of the fallen angels were these Horites; the blood line of the fallen angels were these Horites - the Horim, the cave dwellers who lived in Mount Seir.

Suppose a white man married two Negresses here, and then moved to the interior of the Congo; and for the next 18 Centuries his descendants lived there with no one they could marry except the Negroes around them; of course the last trace of white blood would have vanished. Nevertheless, after 18 centuries of breeding into the Negroes they could still say, "18 centuries ago we had one white ancestor."

Now these weren't Negroes; these were the Satanic Canaanites, but the principle is the same. These Jews talking with Christ had identified themselves as Edomite Jews. Genesis chapter 36 lists Esau's descendants. Verses 20 to 30 specifically list all the various dukes or chieftains among the family of Seir, the Horite, Satanic line, including his daughter Timna.

And Genesis 36:12 shows that Timna was a concubine to Esau's son Eliphaz and bore him a son Amalek. And you remember what a pestilential lot the whole tribe of Amalek were. They behaved, throughout, according to the Satanic blood line. You will find a good deal of that in Exodus 17:8-16 and Numbers 20:14-21.

This same Satanic conduct on the part of the Edomites was repeated as opportunity arose. Remember that when the people of Israel came out of Egypt in the Exodus and they wanted to march on up to Palestine, they were attacked by the Edomites and driven back so they had to detour around, down through the wilderness in the Sinai Peninsula.

Again, when the Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem and looted and burned the city and massacred a lot of the inhabitants, the Edomites came rushing in to help in the massacre and plunder.

This is related in the Book of Psalms:

"REMEMBER, O LORD, THE CHILDREN OF EDOM IN THE DAY OF JERUSALEM; WHO SAID, RASE IT, RASE IT, EVEN TO THE FOUNDATION THEREOF. O DAUGHTER OF BABYLON, WHO ART TO BE DESTROYED; happy shall he be, that rewardeth thee as thou hast served us. Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones." (Psalm 137:7-9)

Rase: Strong's Concordance: #6168  `arah (aw-raw'); a primitive root; to be (causatively, make) bare; hence, to empty, pour out, demolish: KJV- leave destitute, discover, empty, make naked, pour (out), rase, spreadself, uncover.

Here we can see that while Esau/Edom (the Jews) were glad to see Jerusalem destroyed, and wanted it leveled to the ground; and because of this God said that they are be destroyed.

The whole book of Obadiah is just one continuous condemnation of the Edomites, for the way they acted, and predicting their eventual slaughter and punishment for it. Obadiah, verse 10:

"For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever."

Obadiah, verse 15;

"For the day of Yahweh is near upon all the heathen: as thou hast done, it shall be done unto thee: thy reward shall return upon thine own head."

Obadiah, verse 18:

"And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau; for Yahweh has spoken it." Amen

Exodus 17:14-16:

"And Yahweh said unto Moses, Write this for a memorial in a book, and rehearse it in the ears of Joshua: for I will utterly put out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven. And Moses built an altar, and called the name of Yahweh; Nissi (Yahweh; our banner). For he said, Because Yahweh hath sworn that YAHWEH WILL HAVE WAR WITH AMALEK FROM GENERATION TO GENERATION (Amalek is an ancestor to the Jews; therefore, Yahweh will have war against the Jews until they are totally destroyed)."

Now, how did these Satanic, mongrel, Edomite Jews get up there into Judea? They came in two principal waves.

During the time that the southern kingdom of Judah was practically empty during the Babylonian captivity, the Edomites were driven out of Mount Seir by a heavy invasion of an Arab people, the Nabateans, from the east. So the Edomites were driven westward. Now they couldn't go southwest or straight west: they would then be getting into Egyptian territory, and they weren't strong enough to fight the Egyptians.

So they went slightly north of west and took over the southerly half of what had been the kingdom of Judah, and settled there. When the little remnant came back from Babylon, the Books of Ezra and Nehemiah show that 42,600, or something like that, came back.

But it lists them by their families; and if one runs those down they will find that slightly over 8,000 of these were not from any tribe of Israel.

In other words, only 34,000 of the 42,000 that came back were Israelites of the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, and a few Levites among them. Now they were too few to drive out these numerous and warlike Edomites; all they could do was settle in the little territory left to them.

To give you an idea of the size of that; the entire territory of the twelve tribed nation of Israel before it broke up, set down here in Southern California, would extend from the Mexican border to the southerly part of Los Angeles; and inland from the coast it never was more than 40 miles wide.

Now divide that into thirds. The northerly two thirds of that comprised the kingdom of Israel - the ten tribed, northern kingdom. So only the southerly one-third of that was the Kingdom of Judah.

Now of that one-third, take out the southerly half of that, now occupied by the Edomites, and the little strip left is all that remains for the true Judaites and Benjamites to settle in.

Before the captivity, the tribe of Judah had been on the south, the tribe of Benjamin on the north, with the city of Jerusalem lying right on the boundary line between them. Well, they sorted themselves out as well as they could, the way they had been before; Judah on the south, and Benjamin pushed to the north.

But Benjamin couldn't just move up to the north a little bit, because north of them was Samaria (remember I said, dived this twelve tribe territory into thirds) the middle third constituted Samaria.

Isaiah and Kings and Chronicles tell you that when the Assyrians captured the northern kingdom of Israel and deported all its people, they brought other people from Assyria and settled them in Samaria. Now it purposely failed to say they settled anybody in Galilee, the northern most portion; because they didn't, they left it vacant.

No the Benjamites were pushed to the north by the Judaites, as they returned after the captivity. They just couldn't move up into Samaria: that was fully settled. So they had to leap-frog over Samaria to the vacant Galilee, to the north of that.

Remember, up in Galilee was Christ's home town of Nazareth, He was born in Bethlehem, close to Jerusalem, but his family home was in Nazareth. Remember He got nearly all of His converts in Galilee; and of the twelve disciples only Judas was a Jew. The Bible calls him Judas Iscariot; and there is no such word as "Iscariot" in any language known to man.

It is a corruption of the Hebrew word "ish Kerioth," meaning, a man of Kerioth, and  Kerioth was a little village in the southwesterly portion of Judea, in the territory occupied by the Edomites. So Judas was an Edomite Jew, and he was the only Jew of the twelve; the other eleven were all Galileans, therefore, Benjamites.

Now, again, consider Pentecost, when the people were gathered there and the Holy Spirit came upon the disciples (and remember they were all there except Judas Iscariot), they began speaking to this assembled multitude in a wider number of different languages. And how astonished the people were, when they heard the disciples speaking all these different languages, which obviously they didn't know. They said, "Aren't all these Galileans?" They were, as all the remaining disciples were.

"Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marveled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus." (Acts 4:13)

South of what was left of the territory of Judah is where the Edomite Jews settled, and of course, pestiferous people always, they were constantly raiding the southerly boundary of Judea, the way their descendants with their Khazar brothers are raiding the Arabs' territory today.

A leopard doesn't change his spots, you know. And for a long time after the return from the Babylonian captivity, the people in Judea were a conquered province of one empire or another; Syria or Egypt, and finally Rome.

But they got their little flare-up of independence under the Maccabee kings, beginning about 150 B.C., and about 120 B.C., John Hyrcanus, one of the Maccabee kings (who had by that time a good disciplined army) got tired of these Edomite Jewish raids on his southern border, and he marched down there and defeated them thoroughly. Remember that Saul, the first King of all the Israel tribes, was told by God,

"You go down there and you absolutely exterminate these Edomites: don't you leave one of them alive." (paraphrased)

But he didn't do it, and when he came back the prophet Samuel said,

"Because you have disobeyed God, He has deposed you from being king, and He is going to put a better man in your place." (paraphrased)

Approximately 900 years later, John Hyrcanus made the same mistake. After he had defeated the Edomites, he then decided he was going to be a missionary; he would convert them to the religion of Judaism.

So he offered them the choice; he would spare them if they would accept the religion of Judaism (which was not the religion of the Old Testament, ever; it was what they had brought back from Babylon with them the Babylonian Talmud; in Christs' day it was known as the tradition of the elders, it was not codified into writing until 400 A.D. into the Talmud).

The late Rabbi Stephen S. Wise said it so briefly and accurately, I have never been able to improve on his words. He said,

"The return from Babylon and the introduction of the Babylonian Talmud marked the end of Hebraism and the beginning of Judaism."

The people of the Old Testament were real Hebrews and the religion God had given them could well be called Hebraism. And of course, the Talmud-Judaism began as they destroyed the religion of the Old Testament. But in Christ's time they had not yet given it the name of the Talmud: they called it "the tradition of the elders."

Remember how often Jesus Christ rebuked them for following their tradition. "Why have ye by your tradition set aside the laws of God?" He was referring to the Talmud. So John Hyrcanus was going to be a Jewish Billy Graham of his day: he was going to make converts.

He said,

"If you will adopt the religion of Judaism, I will give you full citizenship in the kingdom of Judea. If you don't, I will cut your throats."

Well, you know that is the most effective missionary technique they have ever developed, even Billy Graham doesn't make converts that fast.

Of course, the converts he makes with the sword are of doubtful validity. So the Edomites adopted the religion of Judaism and were accepted in full citizenship in the kingdom. Now you will find that described in great detail in the one reliable history of that period; Josephus, in his history, "Antiquities of the Jews," Book 13, chapter 9.

The second wave of Edomites came in when the Edomite chieftain Herod conquered and became king of Judea, under the Roman Empire. He was a very able, very evil scoundrel. He raised a large sum of money by taxation and by raiding his neighbors, and with it he bribed Mark Anthony who was over Egypt with the Roman legions, in addition to his own Edomite troops, for a conquest of Judea.

And, with the Roman troops and his own, he did capture Judea. In 40 B.C., the Romans recognized him as governor with the title, Ethnarch, and in 37 B.C., they formally recognized him as the local King of Judea. Of course, he was subject to Roman foreign policy but he had complete self-government at home. As Rome served as an occupying army, much the way our American troops do in Germany.

Now he had come in with a conquering army and, of course, his Jewish Edomite followers came in, for the sake of the plunder they could get (just as they did Germany, and are trying to do to Switzerland for the plunder they can get). So they overran the place.

You may learn how much about these events by reading Josephus' "Antiquities of the Jews," Books 14 to 18. In his other history, the "Wars of the Jews," Book 4, chapters 4 and 5, Book 5 and chapter 6 and thereafter, he tells of the horrible conduct of these Edomite Jews within the besieged city of Jerusalem while it was undergoing siege by Titus in the year 70 A.D.

Their robbery and massacre of the inhabitants inflicted probably more casualties than the Roman army did. In the Jewish Encyclopedia, the article "Edom," (in the edition I used to look it up, it was Vol. 5, page 41), the article "Edom" concludes with these words:

"The Edomites are found today in modern Jewry."

These Edomites had come in first, when they were given full citizenship by John Hyranus,; second, they had come in as a wave of conquerors under Herod (that is the same Herod who tried to murder Christ as a baby). they had overrun the land, they had the entire civil and religious government, until the death of Herod in 4 B.C.

Then Herod left the kingdom of Judea, by will, to his son Herod Archelaus. The Romans were too wise to trust somebody with the kingdom when they didn't know anything about him.

They gave him a trial period as governor, under the title, Ethnarh; and he gave them 10 years of the most miserable misrule that any nation ever had, 4 B.C., to 6 A.D., and the people finally petitioned Rome to send a Roman to govern them.

Now remember the people didn't like the tyranny of Rome a bit: but when this was so bad they said, "We would rather be governed by a foreigner, a Roman," you can understand how bad it was.

The Romans tried Herod Archelaus, found him guilty of misrule, and banished him to Vienne; and from that time on there were a series of Roman governors called procurators: Pontius Pilate was number six in that series. So the military government was entirely in the hand of the Roman procurators.

The collection of taxes for Rome was entirely under the supervision of the Roman procurator. On the other hand, these Herodian Jews had control of the entire religious government and the temple. They also had control of the civil government, in all respect concerning purely local self-government; could collect their own taxes, and so on.

You remember, when the priests were getting greatly upset about Jesus's teachings they said,

"If we let Him alone, all men will believe on Him; and the Romans will take this place, this kingdom, away from us." (John 11:50; 18:14)

The way the Judeo-Christian clergymen have taught it, that is meaninglessly stupid. They pictured Christ as a whining, cringing, milk-sop, going around, whimpering to people that they ought to be good.

If that was all He did, these Jews would not have honored Him even with their contempt, much less be worried about Him. He was exposing and explaining to the people, the utter evil of the Jewish economic and religious system under which they were living.

The Jews said,

"Look, if we let Him alone, He is going to awaken the people to these evils. They will petition Rome just as they did with Herod Archelaus, and the Romans will kick us out of here." 

This is what the Judeo-Christian clergymen will not do and God says about these false teachers, Jeremiah 23:16-22:

"Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD. They say still unto them that despise me, The LORD hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart, No evil shall come upon you. For who hath stood in the counsel of the LORD, and hath perceived and heard his word? who hath marked his word, and heard it?...I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied. But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings."

That is what they were talking about. So here were these Edomite Jews, who said to Jesus Christ, "We are descendants of Abraham."

They were illegitimate descendants of Abraham but, nevertheless, descendants of Abraham, and they said, "We've never been in bondage to any man." And Christ said, "That's right." Now continue that same passage through John 8:31-44, and you will come to the place where Christ tells them that they were the children of their father, the devil, and they would do the lusts of their father, the devil and that they were not of God. (John 8:47)

Christ recognized the two seed lines, He didn't say, "Well, you have adopted some of the bad principles of the devil." He said,

"You 'are' the children of your father the devil." (John 8:44)

Then Christ said it another way when He said later on in John:

"He that is of God heareth God's words: YE (Jews) THEREFORE HEAR THEM NOT, BECAUSE YE (Jews) ARE NOT OF GOD." (John 8:47)

So the entire Bible, Old Testament and New Testament, recognizes the two seed lines. The Adamic seed line coming down through a carefully selected best one in each generation, right on down to Abraham, Isaac, Israel and then on down through the twelve tribes of Israel. The seed, the children of God and the seed, the children of Satan; some of whom, the most pestiferous of them, have come down through the line of Cain.

The Bible says that Cain said, "Why, you've driven me out of this land where the descendants of Adam would be." And he said, "Wherever I go, whoever meets me will kill me."

And in those days there were a lot of places that weren't too hospitable to strangers. If as the Judeo-Christian preachers say, Adam and Eve were the parents of the only people on earth (the only other child had been Abel and he was dead); now with Cain driven away from Adam and Eve, out into some other part of the earth, who was he going to meet there to kill him?

And you remember, it says that he very speedily found enough people, that with them he built a city. So the Bible recognizes these pre-Adamite races. But God said,

"Well, I'll put a mark on you, so that people will recognize you and not kill you."

What was this mark? Did God tattoo something on the sole of his foot or where he would sit down on it? No long before any hidden mark could possibly have been seen, he would have been killed. God had to put it where it was the first  thing they would see, and He put it where it was the first thing they would see, and He put it right in the exact geometrical center of his face: that big Jewish nose which they have borne ever since, and the sculptured monuments of the ancient empires show it.

The ancient kings were extremely vain of the conquests they had made. The pharaohs of Egypt, the kings of Babylon, the kings of Assyria, the kings of Persia, all left elaborately carved monuments telling how they had captured this city or that, and massacred so many of its inhabitants and made slaves of the others, and took so much loot, and so forth.

In addition to the inscriptions they nearly always had a carved panel illustrating this,   showing some of the captives. Now wherever any of these show an Israelite, it is invariably a straight nose, typical, what we  would call an Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian or Teutonic type of face. But where it shows these Canaanite peoples, it is always a typical hook-nose Jew.

The evidence of the Bible, the evidence of archaeology all show one thing, definitely, right down the line: the existence of the Satanic seed line, and the existence of the other seed line of God's own children.

There are some who say they are Jew lovers. Which makes others wonder how they can say that and in the same breath say they are Christians, which means to follow the Lord Jesus Christ; Who was God in the flesh, here on earth in a flesh body.

God asks a question in 2 Chronicles:

"Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD?..." (2 Chronicles 19:2)

They ignore the writings of the Jews themselves when they say they are not Israelites. Things like Under the heading of "A brief History of the Terms for Jew" in the 1980 Jewish Almanac is the following:

"STRICTLY SPEAKING IT IS INCORRECT TO CALL AN ANCIENT ISRAELITE A 'JEW' OR TO CALL A CONTEMPORARY JEW AN ISRAELITE OR A HEBREW." (1980 Jewish Almanac, p. 3).

Again:

"The current expression 'Judeo-Christian' is an error which has altered the course of universal history by the confusion it has sown in men's mind, if by it one is meant to understand the Jewish origin of Christianity; for by abolishing the fundamental distinctions between Jewish and Christian messianism, IT SEEKS TO BRING TOGETHER TWO IDEAS THAT ARE RADICALLY IN OPPOSITION. By laying the accent exclusively on the 'Christian' idea to the detriment of the 'Judean' it conjures away monotheistic messianism - a valuable discipline at all levels of thought, and reduces it to a purely confessional messianism, preoccupied like Christian messianism with the salvation of the individual soul. If the term 'Judeo-Christian' does point to a common origin, there is no doubt that it is a most dangerous idea.
"It is based on a 'contrdictio in adjecto' which has set the path of history on the wrong track. It links in one breath TWO IDEAS WHICH ARE COMPLETELY IRRECONCILABLE, IT SEEKS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN DAY AND NIGHT OR HOT AND COLD OR BLACK AND WHITE, and thus introduces a fatal element of confusion to a basis on which some, nevertheless, are endeavoring to construct a civilization. Christianity offers to the world a limited messianism which it wishes to impose as the only valid one...Even Spinoza, who was further than any other thinker from the historic messianism of Israel, wrote: 'As for what certain churches say, that God assumed human nature, I must confess that this seems to me as absurd as saying that a circle assumed the shape of a square...'
"(Spinoza, goes ahead and says) The dogmatic exclusiveness professed by Christianity must finally end...It is the obstinate Christian claim to be the sole heir to Israel which propagates-anti-Semitism. This scandal must terminate sooner or later; the sooner it goes, the sooner the world will be rid of the issue of lies in which anti-Semitism shrouds itself." (Joshua Jehouda, l'Antisemitisme Miroir du Monde, pp. 135-136; Judaism and the Vatican, Vicomte Leon de Poncins, pp. 30-31).

When the Jew lovers are shown that the Jews are actually the descendants of the ancient Khazars, they laugh it off and say that is just so much nonsense. Again they disdain the words of the people they "love" who say in their encyclopedias:

New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia, page 179,[GCP pg 68] "ASHKENAZI, ASHKENAZIM... constituted before 1963 some nine-tenths of the Jewish people (about 15,000,000 out of 16,5000,000)[ As of 1968 it is believed by some Jewish authorities to be closer to 100%]"

And of course they ignore such as the following, because it does not adhere to their particular beliefs which is everything but Christian.

JUDEO-CHRISTIAN HERITAGE A HOAX: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians.
"THAT 'JUDEO-CHRISTIAN DIALOGUE' IN THIS CONTEXT IS ALSO ABSURD AS WELL STATED IN THE AUTHOR-INITIATIVE RELIGIOUS JOURNAL, JUDAISM, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote:

"As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. JUDAISM IS JUDAISM BECAUSE IT REJECTS CHRISTIANITY; and CHRISTIANITY IS CHRISTIANITY BECAUSE IT REJECTS JUDAISM. What is usually referred to as the JEWISH-CHRISTIAN TRADITIONS EXISTS ONLY IN CHRISTIAN OR SECULARIST FANTASY."

There is no doubt this is true! And the fantasy exists in Christian and Secularist minds only because it was implanted there by the persistent propaganda of the masters of intrigue of the ADL-AJC Network. Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that knowledgeable theologians, Jewish and Christians who constantly allude to "our Judeo-Christian heritage" are for their own specious purposes perpetuate a grotesque and fantastic hoax.

The attitude of Jesus Christ to this sect is definitely expressed in the New Testament. Ask yourself the following questions regarding present day Jews Then you decide from the Word of God, WHO IS TRUE ISRAEL.

1). Have the Jews been a blessing to all nations?

2). Have the Jews been "CIRCUMCISED IN THE HEART?"

3). Do the Jews glorify Jesus Christ?

4). Do the Jews declare that Jesus is God?

5). Do the Jews show forth the praises of Christ, God's Son?

6). Have the Jews carried the message of Salvation to the ends of the Earth?

7). Do the Jewish people have God's Spirit in their hearts?

8). Was the New Covenant (Testament) written to Jews or Israelites and what is the difference between the two?

9). Are the Jews the "LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL?"

10). Are the Jews the "CHILDREN OF GOD, SCATTERED ABROAD?"

11). Are the Jews the servants of God?

12). Are the Jews a Holy Nation and People?

13). Are there any Jews mentioned in the "FAITH CHAPTER" of Hebrews 11?

14). Are the Jews a righteous nation?

15). Are the Jews bringing forth the fruits of God's Kingdom?

16). Are the Jews kind to strangers in their midst?

17). Are the Jews called the "CHILDREN OF THE LIVING GOD?"

18). Do the Jews admit that they are not God's People?

19). Do the Jews have all of God's Word?

20). Are the Jews a Great and Mighty Nation?

21). Do the Jews possess the "GATES OF THEIR ENEMIES?"

22). Are the Jews a "COMPANY OF NATIONS?"

23). Are the Jews above all people in moral excellence?

24). Are the Jews today called through Isaac?

25). Have the Jews ever lost their identity?

26). Have the Jews ever been called by a "NEW NAME?"

27). Are the major heathen nations aligned against the Jews alone?

28). Are the modern day Jews described as "A GREAT LION?"

29). Did the Jews deliver Jerusalem from the power of the heathen?

30). Has the Jewish people ever had the name of "GREAT?"

31). Have the Jews been foremost in ending slavery?

32). Have the Jews been great colonizers?

33). Do the Jews recognize Jesus as Messiah?

34). Does your pastor teach that the "JEWS ARE ALL OF ISRAEL?"

35). Do you honestly know what the Bible teaches about the Jews and Israel?

"Although the Jews have appeared in the histories of other nations throughout the centuries, they were never able or willing to establish a nation of their own (They did take control of the Khazar nation, once the king had accepted Judaism as his and his peoples religion in 740 A.D. And they had a very large kingdom at that time but it didn't last very long until True Israelites defeated and destroyed their kingdom).
"They remain forever desolate in this regard. The only way the Jews got possession of Palestine was by using other people to steal it from the Turks and Arabs for them. The so-called 'Israeli' state is nothing but a parasitic state, since it is occupied by parasites.
"The Jews get billions of dollars from Germany as 'reparations' and 'restitution payments' for its alleged 'war crimes' against Jews. They get billions more every year from the United States. IT (Israel; the Jews) HAS TO STEAL OR BUY TECHNOLOGY FROM WESTERN NATIONS (The many nations of Israel) AS THE JEWS HAVE NOT THE CREATIVITY TO DEVELOP THEIR OWN.
"THE JEWISH STATE OF ISRAELI WOULD COLLAPSE IN A MINUTE WITHOUT THE CONTINUED SUPPORT, PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE FROM JACOB/ISRAEL (The White Nations of Christendom). IT IS NOT, NEVER HAS BEEN, AND NEVER WILL BE A SELF-SUSTAINING NATION." (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom?, pp. 27-28).    

The Jews again tell Christians, such as those that say they love them, but they ignore it because they choose to, not because it is not true, but because they do not have the moral courage to admit they have been deceived.

No matter what they claim, the Jews DO NOT BELIEVE THE WORDS OF CHRIST:

"There never was a time when any Jew believed that Jehovah spoke to Moses or to the Prophets in any other sense than we believe today that God - that is, existence - reveals himself through the minds of a Spinoza, a Hegel, a Marx, an Einstein and the like." (A Program for the Jews and Humanity, Harry Waton, p. 217)

This is born out in scripture for in the parable about Lazarus and the Rich Man, we are told about the Jews:

"...They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them." (Luke 16:29)

The Jews seemingly convert to Christianity only to bring in damnable heresies and false doctrine:

"A JEW REMAINS A JEW EVEN THOUGH HE CHANGES HIS RELIGION; a Christian which would adopt the Jewish religion would not become a Jew, because the quality of a Jew is not in the religion but in the race. A Free thinker and Atheist always remains a Jew." (Jewish World, London December 14, 1922)

In fact the purpose of the Jews is to destroy the Christianity they hate:

"THE JEW IS NOT SATISFIED WITH DE-CHRISTIANIZING, HE JUDIAZIZES, HE DESTROYS THE CATHOLIC OR PROTESTANT FAITH, he provokes indifference but HE IMPOSES HIS IDEA OF THE WORLD OF MORALS AND OF LIFE UPON THOSE WHOSE FAITH HE RUINS. HE WORKS AT HIS AGE OLD TASK, THE ANNILATION OF THE RELIGION OF CHRIST." (Benard Lazare, L'Antisemitism, p. 350; Rabbi Benamozegh, quoted in J. Creagh Scott's Hidden Government, page 58).

Christ came only to the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel:

"These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not: But GO rather TO THE LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL." (Matthew 10:5-6)

"But he answered and said, I AM NOT SENT BUT UNTO THE LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL." (Matthew 15:24)

Christ came "only" to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, He did not come for any other people or any other race; He came only to the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel.

God asks a question in 2 Chronicles:

"Shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the LORD?..." (2 Chronicles 19:2)

For those that love the Jews; I ask should you love them that hate our God? For Christ said that the Jews Hated Him, and He was God in the flesh:

"But they cried out, Away with him, away with him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar." (John 19:15)

Here the people living in Jerusalem, who people today know as Jews (they were people who lived in Judah, but were not Israelites. Just the same as a person originally from Mexico, but was born in Texas; that person would be a Mexican, but he would also be a Texan. The same applies to the Jews, they were a people different from the True Israelites, but were called Judeans because they were born and lived in Judea), but were really the descendants of the mixed breed between True Israelites and the other races and people in the area of Palestine; were saying that they would not have Christ to rule over them but wanted Caesar instead. But we know this to be another Jewish lie, because they were constantly in rebellion against Rome.

"But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me." (Luke 19:27)

Here Christ said to bring His enemies, the Jews, and slay them before Him. And that will be done, for most of the Jews in the world today are right here in the United States, and will be slain before the Lord here, and there will be none of them left.

"As for what you say about their making attempts on your lives: MAKE YOUR SONS DOCTORS AND APOTHECARIES, THAT THEY MAY TAKE AWAY CHRISTIANS' LIVES. (The Revue des etudes Juives, by James de Rothschild, published in 1889 two documents)

Following are many verses showing that God hates the Jews and will totally destroy them at some point in the future.

"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand. For I lift up my hand to heaven, and say, I live for ever. If I whet my glittering sword, and mine hand take hold on judgment; I WILL RENDER VENGEANCE TO MINE ENEMIES, AND WILL REWARD THEM THAT HATE ME. I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh; and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives, FROM THE BEGINNING OF REVENGES UPON THE ENEMY. Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people: for he will avenge the blood of his servants, and will render vengeance to his adversaries, and will be merciful unto his land, and to his people." (Deuteronomy 32:39-43)

"So LET ALL THINE ENEMIES PERISH, O LORD: but let them that love him be as the sun when he goeth forth in his might..." (Judges 5:31)

"Let God arise, LET HIS ENEMIES BE SCATTERED: LET THEM ALSO THAT HATE HIM FLEE BEFORE HIM. As smoke is driven away, so drive them away: as wax melteth before the fire, so LET THE WICKED PERISH AT THE PRESENCE OF GOD." (Psalm 68:1-2)

"Arise, O God, plead thine own cause: REMEMBER HOW THE FOOLISH MAN REPROACHETH THEE DAILY. FORGET NOT THE VOICE OF THINE ENEMIES: THE TUMULT OF THOSE THAT RISE UP AGAINST THEE INCREASETH CONTINUALLY." (Psalm 74:22-23)

"Therefore saith the Lord, the LORD of hosts, the mighty One of Israel, Ah, I WILL EASE ME OF MINE ADVERSARIES, AND AVENGE ME OF MINE ENEMIES." (Isaiah 1:24)

"Thine hand shall be lifted up upon thine adversaries, and ALL THINE ENEMIES SHALL BE CUT OFF." (Micah 5:9) (KJV)

"The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, TILL I MAKE THINE ENEMIES THY FOOTSTOOL?" (Matthew 22:44; Mark 12:36) (KJV)

"Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for YE COMPASS SEA AND LAND TO MAKE ONE PROSELYTE, and WHEN HE IS MADE, YE MAKE HIM TWOFOLD MORE THE CHILD OF HELL THAN YOURSELVES." (Matthew 23:15) (KJV)

"WHEN PILATE therefore heard that saying, HE BROUGHT JESUS FORTH, and sat down in the judgment seat in a place that is called the Pavement, but in the Hebrew, Gabbatha. And it was the preparation of the Passover, and about the sixth hour: AND HE SAITH UNTO THE JEWS, BEHOLD YOUR KING! BUT THEY (The Jews) CRIED OUT, AWAY WITH HIM, AWAY WITH HIM, CRUCIFY HIM. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King? THE CHIEF PRIESTS ANSWERED, WE HAVE NO KING BUT CAESAR (Thus the Jews rejected the idea that Christ might rule over them, because they are not Israelites)." (John 19:13-15) (KJV)

"But those mine enemies (the Jews), which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me." (Luke 19:27) (KJV)

"The strongest supporters of Judaism cannot deny that Judaism is anti-Christian." (Jewish World, March 15, 1924)                                                            

There is Edom [Esau is called Edom in Genesis 36:8. And Edom is in 'Modern Jewry' Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41.



"I have loved you, saith the LORD. Yet ye say, Wherein hast thou loved us? Was not Esau Jacob's brother? saith the LORD: YET I LOVED JACOB, And I HATED ESAU, and laid his mountains and his heritage waste for the dragons of the wilderness. Whereas Edom saith, We are impoverished, but we will return and build the desolate places; thus saith the LORD of hosts, THEY SHALL BUILD, BUT I WILL THROW DOWN; AND THEY SHALL CALL THEM, THE BORDER OF WICKEDNESS, AND, THE PEOPLE AGAINST WHOM THE LORD HATH INDIGNATION FOR EVER. And your eyes shall see, and ye shall say, The LORD will be magnified from the border of Israel. A son honoureth his father, and a servant his master: if then I be a father, where is mine honour? and if I be a master, where is my fear? saith the LORD of hosts unto you, O PRIESTS (there is no doubt that this is speaking of those Jews who pose as Christian priests, ministers, and etc. Also the so-called Judeo-Christian clergy that are deceiving, and polluting God's word every day, while they pose as His servants), THAT DESPISE MY NAME. And YE SAY, WHEREIN HAVE WE DESPISED THY NAME? YE OFFER POLLUTED BREAD UPON MINE ALTAR; AND YE SAY, WHEREIN HAVE WE POLLUTED THEE? IN THAT YE SAY, THE TABLE OF THE LORD IS CONTEMPTIBLE." (Malachi 1:2-7) 

"As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated." (Romans 9:13)

Yahweh again and again states that He will totally destroy the Jews, who are Edom, and Idumea:

"THE SWORD OF THE LORD IS FILLED WITH BLOOD...AND A GREAT SLAUGHTER IN THE LAND OF IDUMEA." (Isaiah 34:6)

John the Baptist called the Jews vipers:

Vipers: Thayer's Definition: #2191  echidna-a viper, offspring of vipers; addressed to cunning, malignant, wicked men.

Christ in Matthew 12 said that the Jews were evil:

"O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh." (Matthew 12:34)

Christ again condemns the Jews:

"Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?" (Matthew 23:33)

Again in Luke John the Baptist relates that the Jews were vipers:

"Then said he to the multitude that came forth to be baptized of him, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come?" (Luke 3:7)

In Timothy we are told:

"Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." (2 Timothy 4:2-4)

Then we are told that the Jews:

"FOR THERE ARE MANY UNRULY AND VAIN TALKERS AND DECEIVERS, SPECIALLY THEY OF THE CIRCUMCISION (the scribes, Pharisees, and Sadducees; known to the world today as the Jews): WHOSE MOUTHS MUST BE STOPPED, WHO SUBVERT WHOLE HOUSES, TEACHING THINGS WHICH THEY OUGHT NOT, FOR FILTHY LUCRE'S SAKE (Have you not noticed that all the Judeo-Christian clergy and are Jews are always teaching others how to get rich, but in reality they are the only ones getting rich off the dumb goyim, the Christians who listen to these religious hucksters). One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; NOT GIVING HEED TO JEWISH FABLES, AND COMMANDMENTS OF MEN (the teachings of the Learned Elders), THAT TURN FROM THE TRUTH (the Jews turn you from the truth, to their fables). Unto the pure all things are pure: but UNTO THEM (the Jews) THAT ARE DEFILED AND UNBELIEVING IS NOTHING PURE; BUT EVEN THEIR MIND AND CONSCIENCE IS DEFILED. THEY PROFESS THAT THEY KNOW GOD; BUT IN WORKS THEY DENY HIM, BEING ABOMINABLE, AND DISOBEDIENT, AND UNTO EVERY GOOD WORK REPROBATE.  (Titus 1:10-:16)

Now there are some who will say you are not consistent, because you speak of the Judeans as Jews and the Jews as Jews. This is because they do not wish to receive the truth about the Jews; they have believed a lie and don't wish to admit it to themselves or to anyone else.

They would rather worship those who Christ hates than denounce them. So they will try in every way to deny these verses and twist them around so as to deny the truth that is in them.

"THE JEW...IS NOT CONTENT MERELY TO DESTROY CHRISTIANITY, but he preaches the gospel of Judaism; he not only assails the Catholic or the Protestant faith, but he incites to the unbelief, and then imposes on those whose faith he has undermined his own conception of the world, of morality and of life. HE IS ENGAGED IN HIS HISTORIC MISSION, THE ANNIHILATION OF THE RELIGION OF CHRIST." (Benard Lazare, Antisemitism: It's History and Causes, Translated by Britons Publishing Co., London (1967), p. 158).

Over the last 400 years the Jews have cause almost every war fought in that time, through their treason, subterfuge and influencing worthless, traitous politicians.

"WARS ARE THE JEWS HARVEST, FOR WITH THEM WE WIPE OUT THE CHRISTIANS and get control of their gold. WE HAVE ALREADY KILLED 100-MILLION OF THEM, AND THE END IS NOT YET." (Chief Rabbi in France, in 1859, Rabbi Reichorn).

Matthew relates John the Baptist when speaking to the Pharisees and Sadducees:

"But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees come to his baptism, he said unto them, O generation of vipers, who hath warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bring forth therefore fruits meet for repentance: And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire." (Matthew 3:7-10)

1). Therefore the enemy (the Jews and there helpers are) to be destroyed, or taken off the earth. (Exodus 17:14; Numbers 16:26; 24:20; Deuteronomy 7:6; 1 Chronicles 17:9; 2 Samuel 4:11; 7:10; Job 11:20; 18:5; 18:5; 21:17; 21:30; 31:3; Psalm 1; 69; 9:5-6; 9:16-17; 11:5-7; 31:17; 34:21; 37:8; 37:10; 37:14-15; 37:20; 37:28; 37:34; 37:38; 58:10; 68:2; 75:10; 92:7; 101:8; 104:35; 106:18; 112:10; 139:19; 145:20; Proverbs 2:22; 5:22; 10:30; 11:5; 13:9; 21:7; 24:20; 2 Esdras 13:9-11; 13:25-38; Eccesiastes 8:10;  Jeremiah 6:29; 8:10-15; Ezekiel 20:37-38; 35; Isaiah 2:1-9; 11:4; 14:1-29; 25:1; 30:27; 34:5-8;   51:34; 65:12; 66:15-16, 24; Obadiah 1:1-10; 15-21; Nahum 1:15; Zephaniah 1:3; Zechariah 14:21; Malachi 4:1-2; Matthew 3:12; 13:36-38; 13:49-50; 21:41; 25:41; Luke 19:14, 27; 2 Thessalonians 2:8; 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12) Jude 1:1-12). To show that the Jews are Yahweh and Yeashua's enemies: (Psalm 17:9; 22:16; 27:2)

There are those who say, "My closest friends are Jews, and they don't adhere to the Talmud." This is a lie generated to fool Christians and it does its work very well.

"The Talmud must not be regarded as an ordinary work, composed of twelve volumes; it posies absolutely no similarity to any other literary production, but forms, without any figure of speech, a world of its own, which must be judged by its peculiar laws.

"The Talmud contains much that is frivolous of which it treats with great gravity and seriousness; it further reflects the various superstitious practices and views of its Persian (Babylonian) birthplace which presume the efficacy of demonical medicines, or magic, incantations, miraculous cures, and interpretations of dreams. IT ALSO CONTAINS ISOLATED INSTANCES OF UNCHARITABLE JUDGMENTS AND DECREES AGAINST THE MEMBERS OF OTHER NATIONS AND RELIGIONS, AND FINALLY IT FAVORS AN INCORRECT EXPOSITION OF THE SCRIPTURES, ACCEPTING, AS IT DOES, TASTELESS MISREPRESENTATIONS.

"The Babylonian Talmud is especially distinguished from the Jerusalem or Palestine Talmud by the flights of thought, the penetration of mind, the flashes of genius, which rise and vanish again. It was for this reason that the Babylonian rather than THE JERUSALEM TALMUD BECAME THE FUNDAMENTAL POSSESSION OF THE JEWISH RACE, ITS LIFE BREATH, ITS VERY SOUL, NATURE AND MANKIND, POWERS AND EVENTS, WERE FOR THE JEWISH NATION INSIGNIFICANT, NON-ESSENTIAL, A MERE PHANTOM; THE ONLY TRUE REALITY WAS THE TALMUD." (Professor H. Graetz, History of the Jews).

We are told by Ezekiel:

"Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea, which have appointed my land into their possession with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey." (Ezekiel 36:5)

This is in response to the Jews, the Edomites, the Idumeans saying:

"Thus saith the Lord GOD; Because the enemy hath said against you, Aha, even the ancient high places are ours in possession." (Ezekiel 36:2)

Then God tells them:

"The word of the LORD came again unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against the Ammonites (the people who later became known as Jews), and prophesy against them; And say unto the Ammonites, Hear the word of the Lord GOD; Thus saith the Lord GOD; BECAUSE THOU SAIDST, AHA, AGAINST MY SANCTUARY, WHEN IT WAS PROFANED; AND AGAINST THE LAND OF ISRAEL, WHEN IT WAS DESOLATE; AND AGAINST THE HOUSE OF JUDAH, WHEN THEY WENT INTO CAPTIVITY; BEHOLD, THEREFORE I WILL DELIVER THEE TO THE MEN OF THE EAST FOR A POSSESSION, AND THEY SHALL SET THEIR PALACES IN THEE, AND MAKE THEIR DWELLINGS IN THEE: THEY SHALL EAT THY FRUIT, AND THEY SHALL DRINK THY MILK...BECAUSE THOU HAST CLAPPED THINE HANDS, AND STAMPED WITH THE FEET, AND REJOICED IN HEART WITH ALL THY DESPITE AGAINST THE LAND OF ISRAEL; BEHOLD, THEREFORE I WILL STRETCH OUT MINE HAND UPON THEE, AND WILL DELIVER THEE FOR A SPOIL TO THE HEATHEN; AND I WILL CUT THEE OFF FROM THE PEOPLE, AND I WILL CAUSE THEE TO PERISH OUT OF THE COUNTRIES: I WILL DESTROY THEE (the Jews); and thou shalt know that I am the LORD. Thus saith the Lord GOD; BECAUSE THAT MOAB AND SEIR (the Jews) DO SAY, BEHOLD, THE HOUSE OF JUDAH IS LIKE UNTO ALL THE HEATHEN; THEREFORE...BECAUSE THAT EDOM HATH DEALT AGAINST THE HOUSE OF JUDAH BY TAKING VENGEANCE, AND HATH GREATLY OFFENDED, AND REVENGED HIMSELF UPON THEM; THEREFORE THUS SAITH THE LORD GOD; I WILL ALSO STRETCH OUT MINE HAND UPON EDOM, AND WILL CUT OFF MAN AND BEAST FROM IT; AND I WILL MAKE IT DESOLATE FROM TEMAN; AND THEY OF DEDAN SHALL FALL BY THE SWORD. AND I WILL LAY MY VENGEANCE UPON EDOM BY THE HAND OF MY PEOPLE ISRAEL: AND THEY SHALL DO IN EDOM ACCORDING TO MINE ANGER AND ACCORDING TO MY FURY; AND THEY SHALL KNOW MY VENGEANCE, SAITH THE LORD GOD." (Ezekiel 25:1-14)

Jeremiah tells us the same thing, only in different words:

"CONCERNING EDOM, thus saith the LORD of hosts; IS WISDOM NO MORE IN TEMAN? IS COUNSEL PERISHED FROM THE PRUDENT? IS THEIR WISDOM VANISHED?...I WILL BRING THE CALAMITY OF ESAU UPON HIM, THE TIME THAT I WILL VISIT HIM...I HAVE MADE ESAU BARE, I HAVE UNCOVERED HIS SECRET PLACES, AND HE SHALL NOT BE ABLE TO HIDE HIMSELF: HIS SEED IS SPOILED, AND HIS BRETHREN, AND HIS NEIGHBOURS, AND HE IS NOT...FOR, LO, I WILL MAKE THEE SMALL AMONG THE HEATHEN, AND DESPISED AMONG MEN. THY TERRIBLENESS HATH DECEIVED THEE, AND THE PRIDE OF THINE HEART, O THOU THAT DWELLEST IN THE CLEFTS OF THE ROCK, THAT HOLDEST THE HEIGHT OF THE HILL: THOUGH THOU SHOULDEST MAKE THY NEST AS HIGH AS THE EAGLE, I WILL BRING THEE DOWN FROM THENCE, SAITH THE LORD. ALSO EDOM SHALL BE A DESOLATION: EVERY ONE THAT GOETH BY IT SHALL BE ASTONISHED, AND SHALL HISS AT ALL THE PLAGUES THEREOF.
As in the overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah and the neighbour cities thereof, saith the LORD, NO MAN SHALL ABIDE THERE, NEITHER SHALL A SON OF MAN DWELL IN IT." (Jeremiah 49:7-18)

In Ezekiel 5:11-12 God said:

"Wherefore, as I live, said the Lord God, Surely BECAUSE THOU HAST DEFILED MY SANCTUARY WITH ALL THY DETESTABLE THINGS, AND WITH ALL THINE ABOMINATIONS, THEREFORE WILL I ALSO DIMINISH THEE: NEITHER SHALL MINE EYES SPARE, NEITHER WILL I HAVE PITY. A THIRD PART OF THEE SHALL DIE WITH THE PESTILENCE, AND WITH FAMINE SHALL THEY BE CONSUMED IN THE MIDST OF THEE; AND A THIRD SHALL FALL BY THE SWORD ROUND ABOUT THEE: AND I WILL SCATTER A THIRD PART INTO ALL THE WINDS, AND I WILL DRAW OUT A SWORD AFTER THEM."

Amos related about Edom:

"Thus saith the LORD; FOR THREE TRANSGRESSIONS OF EDOM, and for four, I WILL NOT TURN AWAY THE PUNISHMENT THEREOF; BECAUSE HE DID PURSUE HIS BROTHER WITH THE SWORD, AND DID CAST OFF ALL PITY, AND HIS ANGER DID TEAR PERPETUALLY, AND HE KEPT HIS WRATH FOR EVER." (Amos 1:11)

And again Amos tells us concerning Edom:

"In that day will I raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: THAT THEY MAY POSSESS THE REMNANT
Isa 34:5
5 For my sword shall be bathed in heaven: behold, it shall come down upon Idumea, and upon the people of my curse, to judgment.
(KJV)

 OF EDOM, and of all the heathen, WHICH ARE CALLED BY MY NAME, SAITH THE LORD THAT DOETH THIS." (Amos 9:11-12)

Isaiah said:

"For my sword shall be bathed in heaven: behold, it shall come down upon Idumea (Esau/Edom), AND UPON THE PEOPLE OF MY CURSE, TO JUDGMENT. THE SWORD OF THE LORD IS FILLED WITH BLOOD, it is made fat with fatness, and with the blood of lambs and goats, with the fat of the kidneys of rams: for the LORD hath a sacrifice in Bozrah, AND A GREAT SLAUGHTER IN THE LAND OF IDUMEA." (Isaiah 34:5-6)

We will close with the following words from Ezekiel:

"As thou didst rejoice at the inheritance of the house of Israel, because it was desolate, so will I do unto thee: thou shalt be desolate, O mount Seir, and all Idumea, even all of it: and they shall know that I am the LORD." (Ezekiel 35:15)

Therefore, there is no doubt that the Jews are the cursed ones and will be ultimately destroyed by Yahweh in His fierce anger. Thus fulfilling the parable of the Tares and the Wheat, where the evil tares are bound up and thrown into the fire.