The Beast of the Earth Was/Is
Not An Animal - Part 9
Howbeit, the king had arrived
at a high degree of spiritual understanding following his humbling experience
and he left this record for all to read: "Now I Nebuchadnezzar praise and
extol and honour the King of heaven, all whose works are truth, and his
ways judgment: and those that walk in pride he is able to abase." (Daniel
From the Bible itself we
have presented proof that the "beasts of the field" [or "earth"] are a
high order of animal life who are vocal, intelligent, who can sin and repent,
as well as pray. They are the pure stock of the Negro, a servant order.
Let us next turn our attention to the Scriptural account of the orders
of creation where we will find conclusive confirmation of the truth that
Adam and Eve were created in the image of God, a completely distinctive
order of life upon the earth.
Orders of Creation
It has been established that
the Bible refers to a species of creatures brought into being by Almighty
God, the Creator, "beasts of the earth" who were bipeds, that is, tool-making
and tool-handling, two-footed animals. They were intelligent and gifted
with speech, but not in any way related to man. It is advisable, therefore,
to re-examine the account of creation given in the Scriptures in order
to discover their point of origin. Doing so, we find they came into being
prior to the creation of man, who was made in the image of God, whereas
they were not.
God, the Creator, treats
the land animals, with which man was to be closely associated in his efforts
to "subdue" the earth, very differently from the manner in which He treats
the "fowl of the air" and the "fish of the sea." He divided them into three
classes: "cattle," "creeping things" and "beasts" a division that is maintained
throughout the Scriptures: "And God said, Let the earth bring forth the
living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of
the earth after his kind: and it was so. And God made The Beast of the
Earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that
creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good."
In the Biblical classifications
of quadrupeds, the word "cattle" is not necessarily confined to domestic
animals. In its most general Scriptural definition, it refers to any four-footed
animal, domestic or wild. However, it does more often refer to "herds"
and "flocks." It has already been pointed out that the "creeping things"
include a far greater variety of creatures than usually supposed. Since
the word "creep" means "to move along with the body prone," i.e., slinking
forward close to the ground, the category includes four-footed animals
that can crouch. We repeat what Webster's synonyms point out; that "creep"
is used more often of quadrupeds.
After His Kind
The section of the animal
creation under the descriptive phrase "beast of the earth" would not have
presented a complex problem defying easy solution if the primary creative
action, as Scripturally stated, had not been ignored. Among cattle, creeping
things and beast, the Lord decreed that each should propagate "after his
The development of the atheistical
theory of evolution [which state, broadly, that various types of animals,
etc., have their origin in other pre-existing types] was spearheaded by
Charles Darwin's book, Origin of Species, published in 1859.
This spurious doctrine aligned
itself with the growing apostasy which was to engulf all Christendom and
before long produced disbelief in the scientifically accurate but simply-worded
statements of the Bible.
In spite of the fact that
the theory of evolution is based on the idea of "natural development" without
the miraculous intervention of any Divine Being, it found a ready and widespread
acceptance even among so-called Christian believers.
The evil of this anti-Biblical
error spread quickly into schools, colleges, universities and seminaries
until the time came when no one could read with understanding the elementary
phrase, repeated many times in Genesis 1:24-25 "after his kind!" The word
"kind," as translated from the original Hebrew, means "species" and we
should understand from this that each species of animal was created, in
its order, according to the Divine design.
No matter how deplorable
it is to us, this has been a work of Almighty God; so as to fulfill His
words when He said: "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will
sow the house of Israel and the house of Judah with the seed of man, and
with the seed of beast." (Jeremiah 31:27) This is why our White Women and
Men are joining with (marrying, living with, having sex with, and etc)
the Black Race.
While there is great diversity
in the sorts of families within a species [for instance, the many varieties
of dogs], nevertheless, each species remains separate in nature from all
In fact, the Creator's laws
governing procreation do not permit one to cross over into another; most
certainly one does not "evolve" into another. There is order in the Divine
creation; this is why God saw that it was good. He makes it very plain
that mixtures are abhorrent to Him -- they are confusion!
Kinds of Flesh
As a matter of fact, the
Apostle Paul mentions how vital it is that, "all things be done decently
and in order." (1 Corinthians 14:40) Then, as a part of his great discourse
on the resurrection, he made this trenchant observation: "All flesh is
not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh
of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds." (1 Corinthians 15:39)
Contrast this Divinely-inspired,
unequivocal statement of fact with the mouthings of evolutionists: "'Evolution'
means a process by which man must trace his ancestry back to some ape form,
then to some quadruped, thence to some reptile, thence to some amphibian,
thence to some fish, thence to an invertebrate, thence to some single-celled
creature that lived in the slime of the sea." (After Its Kind, by Byron
C. Nelson, p. 2)
In Great Pyramid Proof of
God, George R. Riffert writes under the heading, "An Overworked Word:"
"The popularity of evolution as an anti-Christian explanation for the universe
is not due to anything science has yet discovered in its favor, but rather
to the decline of Christianity in the life of the people, the weakening
of confidence in the Bible as God's Book of Truth and the widespread indiscriminate
use of the word 'evolution' in connection with matters to which it bears
no logical relation. 'Evolution' is the most overworked, misapplied and
misunderstood word in the English language. Growth, development and improvement
are erroneously accepted as its equivalent meanings. So farfetched and
ridiculous has been the use of this word that 'evolution' is now applied
to anything from the undertaker's business to the making of a universe.
When you say that a substance
evolves odors or gasses and a mind evolves ideas, you have said about all
that you can say and still be within the bounds of fact and truth concerning
evolution. To say that a worm evolved a fish and that apes or lizards evolved
men whose descendants produced a Lincoln or a Gladstone, a Handel or a
Michelangelo, to say nothing of the Christ of God, is yielding to a speculative
wildness of brain activity that is little better than philosophical imbecility."
(Great Pyramid Proof of God, pp. 154-155)
The Beast of the Earth Was/Is
Not An Animal - Part 10
Not The Same Blood
We are led to next consider
another related scientific and Scriptural fact. In The Bible and Segregation,
by C.R. Dickey, it is stated: "Paul's statement in Acts 17:26 is now so
interpreted as to make it mean the exact opposite to what Paul intended.
It reads: 'And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on
all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed,
and the bounds of their habitation...' Without quoting the latter part
of this verse, some people make much ado over the first clause, and use
it glibly to overthrow all previous Biblical teaching concerning racial
separation. The key word used to prove the oneness of all mankind is 'blood;'
yet, actually, it proves nothing because the word 'blood' does not appear
in ancient manuscripts. It was added by translators. Ferrar Fenton gives
this most logical reading of the passage: 'Himself giving to every one
life and breath and all things; because He made by One [i.e. Christ] every
race of men to dwell upon the whole face of the earth...'" (The Bible and
Segregation, pp. 16-17)
Furthermore, we are quoting
in part from an article that appeared in The Putnam Sun of Palatka, Florida,
on April 20, 1961, pointing out the fatal consequences of mixed blood transfusions:
"Unheralded by the kept press of the day, but certainly to have more far-reaching
effects than he discovery of the atomic bomb, is the news of recent advances
in the biological sciences. These are of such a nature that we are today
on the threshold of understanding how living things are created and live.
No person capable of reading the printed word should miss, in the April
15th issue of The Saturday Evening Post, an article entitled 'The Messages
of Life,' by James Bonner, professor of biology at California Institute
According to Prof. Bonner
- 'This almost successful search for the principle, the logic, of life
may someday enable us to control the step-by-step development of the human
organism to cultivate replacement organs and perhaps even to initiate life
in isolated cells. This new biology...is largely concerned with the molecular
facts of life...Every day now brings new excitement as research biologists
draw close to a final solution. For they have discovered that each cell
of each individual contains a blueprint, an instruction manual, which gives
the cell detailed instructions on what kind of chemicals to make from the
available food, on how the cell shall divide or duplicate itself, on the
size and shape of the systems it shall form [that is, elephant or mouse]
in short, how the cell should become a part of a particular kind of living
A tremendous fact developed
is that the human races are not the same -- but particular kinds of living
things. The blood of the White Man differs in Molecular construction and
hereditary factors from that of the Negro. The physical evidence of this
difference has been commonly known as sickle cell anemia, a child killer
and causing invalidism in adults. This anemia is not a disease. It occurs
in the blood of the Negro as a mutation from the normal and is an inherited
characteristic. It can be and is transmitted to the White Race by means
of transfusion of Negro blood. Prof. Bonner remarks that 'a striking example
of this...is an enzyme found in victims of the hereditary disease called
sickle cell anemia, characterized by abnormal hemoglobin of red blood cells.'
Developments are gradually leaking out that the epidemics of hepatitis
occurring in hospitals the last few years are closely related to blood
transfusions from different races and peoples. This is now being recognized
by the American Association of Blood Banks. The 'social engineers' and
misguided 'do-gooders' devoting their energies to race mixing as a basis
for social adjustment now are proven wrong from every scientific point
of view. Race mixing is bound to result in race suicide. The Red Cross
and other blood banks who have mixed blood of the races for transfusions
under pressure from minority groups, are guilty of a crime against humanity.
The crime is not directed to the White Race alone -- but there is much
evidence that White Blood given to a Negro has, in many cases, a much more
serious result. According to the official information received from the
Red Cross,' the race of the donor [of blood] has not been shown on any
Red Cross records or on labels applied to the bottles since 1951.' This
must not be continued in the face of the scientific evidence that mixed
blood transfusions may have fatal consequences."
Anthropology Confirms The Bible
Our agreement is with the
Science of Anthropology when its members classify all of mankind into three
basic groups, viz., anthropologist Dr. Henry Field and his staff of the
Chicago natural History Museum who trace the races of mankind from the
three primary sources:
(Hammond's Library World Atlas 1955)
The three great divisions
confirm and amplify those three races as set forth in Gen., Chapters 1
and 2, as the "Aw-dawm" (White or Aryan), "Enosh" (Mongoloid) and "Chayee"
or "Beast of the Field" (Negroid).
these groups as Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Negroid by their contrasting physical
characteristics. As you will continue to discover, there is much more involved
in separating each race from the other characteristically, than most MODERN
scientists in fields affecting racial and social studies, will admit. Through
grants and funding by large tax-free foundations, many members of the profession
of Anthropology have sold their integrity for the price of a ride on the
highly profitable "liberal band-wagon."
All of this has worked well,
on the unsuspecting public, to help evolve the "one-race" or "Brotherhood
of Man" idea the enemies of Christ and His Israel people advocate. However,
occasionally a few do speak out on what they find to be true regarding
separatist factors among the three racial divisions as pertains to abilities
and qualities reflecting upon our Western standards.
Their independent findings
have withstood persecution in place of rebuttal. Dubbing a scientist a
"racist" is a cowards way of avoiding the responsibility of an intelligent
refutation, which seems impossible considering the evidence to be surmounted.
That evidence points to,
"...the overwhelming balance of probability that racial differences exist
in the morphology of the human brain which in turn account for differences
in the capacity to adapt to Western Civilization."
There is no dispute about
the fact that, other things being equal (such as sex, body size, proportion
of parts and stultification) the weight of the brain correlates with intelligence.
This has been found to be true throughout the series of vertebrate animals.
It is only denied in humans because that truth will not fit in with those
who would destroy our Israel people thus destroying Christ's witnesses
Various studies have been
made of the comparative average weights of white and Negro brains with
results that all fall within the range of about 8 to 12% lower weight for
the Negro brain. Such studies have been published by Drs. Bean, Pearl,
Vint, Tilney, Gordon, Todd and others. As a racial average, the Negro brain
is lighter than the white and this in turn indicates a lower average level
In the words of Dr. Carleton
Coon, past president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists:
"Among living populations, absolute brain size is generally, although not
necessarily individually, related to achievement."
Naturally achievement can
be attributed to both mental ability (brain size) and will power. This
latter attribute is a major contributory factor which must necessarily
be evaluated on an individual basis. Dr. Clyde Kluckhohn, Professor of
Anthropology at Harvard wrote, "On the premise that specific capacities
are influenced by the properties of each gene pool, it seems very likely
indeed that populations differ quantitatively in their potentialities for
particular kinds of achievement."
The Beast of the Earth Was/Is
Not An Animal - Part 11
Differences In Races Are Innate
Dr. Henry Garrett, for 15
years head of the Dept., of Psychology at Columbia, tested six cases where
Negroes and Whites had the same exact environment. The tests corroborate
the direct evidence from other sciences, namely that the Negroes' limitations
are chiefly innate!
Other tests show that environment
contributes about 25% and inheritance 75%, to human capacity; the ratio
varying somewhat with different characteristics. Obviously a man's or a
race's genetic limitations eventually influence their environment so that
the one compounds the other. It will never be possible completely to equate
White and Negro "environment" without making the Negro into a White Man.
This the "Race Mixers" know! To equate the Negro with the White they must
be blended into a composite which can equalize only by diminishing the
higher talents of the White Race and raising those of the Negro.
Our God expressly forbids
this in his 7th Commandment against adultery in Exodus 20:14. Funk &
Wagnalls New College Standard Dictionary defines Adulterate: "To make impure
by admixture of other or baser ingredients; corrupt. Adulterated: corrupted,
debased; spurious, Adulterous: from the Latin meaning, to add to, to alter."
The Latin from which our
English originated was preceded by the Greek which followed the Hebrew
of our Holy Scriptures. The entirety of those Scriptures are very definite
regarding Adultery as the mixing of God's people, Israel, in pro-creation,
with any of the other races or mixtures of races!
To ignore this Biblical fact
in preference for the modern, liberalized translation; "marital unfaithfulness"
amounts to a confession of having missed what can easily be considered
one of the most vital acknowledgments to be derived from the Holy Scripture.
It is a case of Intellectual Dishonesty, make no mistake about it! However,
the point we wish to make is that the Bible and Science do agree! Sir Julin
Huxley's finding that a difference of one and one-half percent in average
I.Q. makes a difference of fifty percent in the number of those having
an I.Q. of 160 or higher.
Since the Negro I.Q. ranges
from fifteen to twenty percent below that of the White, it is easy to understand
the relative dearth of Negro intellects throughout human history. And since
a civilization is totally dependent for leadership upon a thin top layer
of it's population, it is equally obvious that any amalgamation of the
races would be disastrous for our culture. Such then, is the cumulative
and converging testimony from anatomy, histology, physical anthropology,
genetics and psychology.
While no single item may
constitute proof, each item constitutes evidence, and we feel justified
in saying that the total of the evidence must amount to proof to any unbiased
mind. When the sum is added to the testimony from history [Here we would
remind you once again: The English historian, Arnold Toynbee, has stated:
'The White Race has created some 13 civilizations, the Oriental race, some
[But] AS OF THIS DATE THE
BLACK RACE HAS NOT, CONTRIBUTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF ONE SINGLE CIVILIZATION;
BUT HAS, IN FACT, DESTROYED EVERY CIVILIZATION HE HAS COME INTO CONTACT
WITH THROUGH THE MIXING OF THE RACES; EGYPT, ASSYRIA, BABYLONIA, GREECE,
and ROME WERE, AT ONE TIME WHITE, BUT DUE TO THE MIXING OF THE RACES, WERE
EVENTUALLY DESTROYED, BECAUSE THE CHILDREN OF MIXED RACES ARE TOO STUPID
TO RETAIN A CIVILIZATION, anywhere in the world.'], the result is beyond
reasonable doubt. Nothing in the self-conflicting and undocumented edicts
of various scientific cliques offers Anything factual in contradiction.
Our American [Israel] people
have been misled long enough by equalitarian propaganda claiming support
in scientific circles. It is time all of us realized that the constant
parroting of denials of the existence of well established evidence does
not effect an adequate refutation. We should become aware that undocumented
resolutions by scientific societies have no probative value, and that the
perversion of truth in the interest of race amalgamation must be stopped.
Honest, conscientious Christians must adhere to God's Word on this subject.
Confirmed By Science
A convincing array of scientific
evidence is now adduced in support of the Biblical premise upon which the
fact is established that the Negro is not of Adamic origin.
The Family Simiidae
When scientists discovered
striking similarities between "prehistoric" inhabitants of the earth and
Negroes, they approached more nearly the truth than they realized. Their
findings that the characteristics of the so-called "Neanderthal man" and
the Negro are very similar are valid because they were not describing the
characteristics of a man but of the "beast of the earth." One scientific
statement is significant in this context because it states: "In anthropology,
the term 'Grimaldi Man' is applied to a Negroid type of prehistoric man
found in the caves of Grimaldi, near Mentone, Italy."
The pure Negro, who was created
before man, is of the family Simiidae, for while he did not "evolve" from
apes, he stands, nevertheless, at the head of that family, as the lion
stands at the head of the cat family. The Negro is of the Anthropoidea
because, while he is not man, he resembles man in many of his characteristics.
It was man who was to have
dominion over the earth and "subdue" it. (Genesis 1:28-30) The "Beast of
the earth" is mentioned separately and the conclusion may be logically
drawn that a being was created by God in the animal order as nearly as
possible like man to take from Adam's shoulders many of the tasks of subduing
the earth, maintaining the Garden of Eden and other duties of the earth
and the field.
Many scientists who, while
they are not familiar with the order of creation in which the Negro is
categorized, do confirm what the Scriptures maintain. It must be said that
this was not always their intention, since some were exponents of the theory
of evolution. This very fact, however, enhances the value of their objective
testimony and Dr. Alexander Winchell, an American geologist and professor
of geology and paleontology in the University of Michigan from 1879 to
1891, made these statements: "The inferiority of the Negro is fundamentally
structural. I have enumerated the points in his anatomy in which he diverges
from the White Race and have indicated that, in all these particulars,
he approximates the organisms below. It follows that what the Negro is
structurally at the present time is the best he has ever been. It follows
that HE HAS NOT DESCENDED FROM ADAM."
When we turn upon the conclusions
of this scientist the light of the Apostle Paul's declaration that "there
is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes,
and another of birds," (1 Corinthians 15:39) we find that the Negro who
"has not descended from Adam." and is consequently not of the "flesh of
men," belongs to one of the other three "kinds of flesh." Being a land
animal, he belongs to the "flesh of beasts" - that is, he is of the Anthropoidea.
Man Not A Species
Let it be stated here with
emphasis that the term "species" correctly applies only to plants and animals;
it does not apply to mankind. The theory of evolution attempts to say that
man is of the "genus of mammals usually considered as belonging to the
order [Primates] which contains also the monkeys, apes and lemurs."
The dictionary definition
of man takes its cue from this and designates man as the highest type of
animal; that he is the human "species." this is entirely erroneous, refuting,
as it does, the inspired statements of the Bible. But, then, this was the
atheistic intention, supported by such evolutionists as Julian Huxley who
did not propose to allow God to be anywhere in the evolutionary picture.
Certainly He was not in the caricatures they drew of "early man!" Huxley
is quoted to have asserted: "If you let God in one place, you may as well
let Him in all along the line."
The whole theory of evolution
-- postulating, as it puts it, man's descent from the ape -- is not only
irrational and unscientific; it is completely unscriptural. One tragic
result is that the Negro has obtained his present unjustifiable, unnatural
position "in the family of man" as the result of the acceptance of the
notion that man is merely a highly develop species of ape -- the "human
species" -- of which the Negro is the lowest race.
Hence, our social, political
and religious relationships with the Negroes are not based upon the Scriptures,
but upon the teachings of atheism. This position repudiates the declaration
the White Man is a distinct creation in the image of God, for our yielding
to the degrading influence of the atheistic theory of evolution; to renounce
kinship with God by claiming to be kin to the ape.
FIRST CONTRAST: Contrasting
Black and White - Advancing his arguments that man - and man alone - was
created in the image of God, Professor Charles Carroll took strong exception
to the evolutionist position (the theory of natural development [selection])
that the White Race is a "human species," one of "five races of men."
As the Professor maintained,
the number of races may be more or less, "dependent upon the whim of the
naturalist who makes the classification." Nevertheless, borrowing the very
phrase he detested, Professor Carroll went on to assert: "The White, the
highest, and the Negro, the lowest of the so-called [five races of men],
present the strongest contrast to each other in their physical and mental
characteristics...White is not a color; neither is Black a color; yet the
White, colorless complexion of the White finds its strongest contrast in
the Black, colorless complexion of the Negro."
The following facts are relevant
here as put on record by Professor Carroll. He quotes first from a discussion
by anthropologist Quatrefages in The Human Species: "With all anthropologists,
I recognize the high value of the color of the skin as a character...We
know that it does not result from the existence or disappearance of special
Black or White, the skin
always comprises a White dermis, penetrated by many capillaries, and epidermis,
more or less transparent and colorless. Between the two is placed the mucous
layer, of which the pigment alone in reality varies in quantity and color
according to the race. All the colors present in the human skin have two
common elements: the White of the dermis and the red of the blood.
Moreover, each has its own
proper element, resulting from the colorings of the pigment. The rays reflected
from these different tissues combine into a resultant which produces the
different tints and traverses the epidermis. The latter plays the part
of roughened glass. The more delicate and the finer it is, the more perceptible
is the color of the subjacent parts...From the preceding we can also understand
why the White alone can be said to turn pale or to blush. The reason is
that in him the pigment allows the slightest difference in the efflux of
the blood to the dermis to be perceived. With the Negro, as with us, the
blood has its share in the coloring, the tint of which it deepens or modifies.
When the blood is wanting, the Negro turns grey from the blending of the
White of the dermis with the Black of the pigment."
The Beast of the Earth Was/Is
Not An Animal - Part 12
Professor Carroll concluded from
his extensive examination of this subject: "Thus, it is shown by the highest
scientific authorities that the Black, colorless complexion of the Negro
IS NOT THE RESULT OF CLIMATIC INFLUENCE; it is due solely to the Black
pigment which intervenes between the dermis and the epidermis."
SECOND CONTRAST: Dr. Ernst
Heindrich Haeckel wrote in "History of Creation," Volume II (pp. 414-415;
1868): "The long, fine, silken hair of the White finds its strongest contrast
in the short, coarse, woolly hair of the Negro. Each individual hair of
the White is cylindrical. Hence, 'its section is circular.' In striking
contrast to that of the White, each individual hair of the Negro 'is flattened
like a tape.' Hence, 'its section is oval.'"
The Negro's hair is inserted
in the vertical in his scalp, while in the White Man's scalp, the insertion
THIRD CONTRAST: The long,
narrow skull of the White finds its strongest contrast in the short, broad
skull of the Negro. The shortness and broadness of the Negro skull displays
its similarity to the bodily construction of the anthropoid ape. A certain
relative length of skull (i.e., high forehead) appears to be associated
with energy, force and executive ability. Hence the shortness of the Negro's
skull denotes his lack of these attributes. The Negro skull is very thick
and solid; it is flattened on the top and well suited to carrying burdens.
FOURTH CONTRAST: The relatively
short, narrow jaw of the White finds its strongest contrast in the long,
broad jaw of the Negro. The jaw of the Negro extends forward at the expense
of the symmetry of the face, and backward at the expense of the brain cavity.
It is well known that in the Negro, the entire face, and especially the
lower portion, projects forward. In the living subject, it is exaggerated
by the thickness of the lips. The prominent chin of the White finds its
strongest contrast in the retreating chin of the Negro. This is also a
Dr. Winchell says: "The retreating
contour of the chin, as compared with the European, approximates the Negro
to the chimpanzee and lower mammals."
The front teeth of the White,
set perpendicularly in the jaw, find their strongest contrast in the front
teeth of the Negro, which set slanting in the jaw, still another simian
characteristic. Dr. Haechel describes as Prognathi those "whose jaws, like
those of the animal's snout, strongly project, and whose front teeth, therefore
slope in front;" and men with straight teeth Orthognathi, "whose jaws project
but little and whose front teeth stand perpendicularly." The relatively
thin lips of the White find their strongest Contrast in the thick, puffed
lips of the Negro. The prominent nose of the White is in strong contrast
to the flat nose of the Negro, which has the appearance of having been
crushed in. In the Negro these are both simian characteristics.
FIFTH CONTRAST: The color
of the Negro brain is darker than that of the White, and its density and
texture inferior. Dr. Winchell states: "The average weight of the European
brain, males and females, is 1,340 grammes; that of the Negro is 1,178
On a related subject, Dr.
J. Hendree of Aniston, Alabama, in writing to Dr. Winchell, made this comment:
"Let me mention one fact especially, drawn from my own experience of forty
years. The coarseness of their (the Negroes') organization makes them require
about double the dose of ordinary medicine used for the Whites."
Dr. M.L. Barrow, of Drayton,
Georgia, in writing to Dr. Winchell, reported: "I have practiced among
the Negroes over forty years...Your information in respect to the dosage
of medicine for the colored people corresponds with my experience - except
as regards opiates, and perhaps they will bear large quantities of these
as I have known some to take very large doses with impunity."
SIXTH CONTRAST: The highly
developed calves, in the bodily structure of the White, find their strongest
contrast in the think calves of the Negro. The calves of the White, situated
low on the leg, find their strongest contrast in the calves of the Negro,
set relatively high on the leg. The short, narrow heel of the White, finds
its strongest contrast in the long, broad heel of the Negro. Again, all
of these Negro characteristics are related to their background as of the
There are certain statements
in the Scriptures which have never been adequately explained by the theological
approach to the study of the Bible. In fact, their context has been ignored
and no analysis of the implications of words used has been made.
For example, in the Book
of Jonah we are told that this prophet went to Nineveh and proclaimed in
that city that in forty days it would be destroyed because of the wickedness
of its inhabitants. Word of Jonah's preaching came to the king of Nineveh
and he descended from his throne, put on sackcloth and issued a proclamation:
"Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let them not
feed, nor drink water." (Jonah 3:7) This was a command to fast and all
men, and their animals, were to obey. The proclamation continued: "But
let man and beast be covered with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God:
yea, let them turn every one from his evil way, and from the violence that
is in their hands. Who can tell if God will turn and repent, and turn away
from his fierce anger, that we perish not?" (Jonah 3:8-9)
Both man and beast, as well
as herds and flocks, were to refrain from eating and drinking. Notice,
however, that the further stipulations of the proclamation were addressed
only to "man and beast" -- not to the herds and the flocks, i.e., the domestic
animals. Man "and beast" were to put on sackcloth; both man "and beast"
were to cry mightily unto God. Furthermore, both man "and beast" were to
turn from their evil ways and refrain from the violence "in their hands."
If the results of comparative
anatomy, which indicate the structural differences of the Negro, are not
found conclusive -- if there is still insistence that he is a descendant
of Adam -- FROM WHICH BRANCH OF THE ADAMIC FAMILY WOULD HE HAVE DESCENDED?
If we were to accept the atheistical doctrine that the Negro and the White
are blood brothers, from whence came all these physical and mental characteristics
which so widely distinguish the White from the Negro?
1). What changes his complexion
from the colorless White to the colorless Black?
2). What turned his smooth,
silken hair to short, coarse, wooly hair and changed each hair of his head
from cylindrical in construction to flat?
3). What wrought the
change in the way his hair was inserted into the scalp, from the oblique
to the vertical?
4). How was his cranium shortened
and broadened, his skull thickened and his brain made another color?
5). What reduced the number
and increased the size of the convolutions of his brain, thus simplifying
and approximating it to the anthropoid ape?
6). What made his brain lighter
7). What broadened his jaw
and extended it forward at the expense of the brain cavity; thickened his
lips, sloped his front teeth, flattened his nose; shortened and thickened
his neck, reduced his chest measurements and lung capacity?
8). What elongated his arms,
reduced the size of his calves, placed them at a high elevation on the
leg, lengthened and broadened his heel and flattened his foot?
9). Why does he have to have
a larger dosage of medicine than the White?
These are only a few of the
many fundamental differences that raise the most serious objections to
the theory that White human beings and the Negroes are the descendants
of the primigenial pair -- Adam and Eve.
The great tasks to which
man was assigned in the Creator's plan were of such magnitude that their
accomplishment would require ages of time for completion and demanded that
man be endowed with a mind almost Godlike in its scope; a mind at once
legislative, executive and judicial. History, tradition and the whole range
of scientific research combine to teach us that man is so endowed.
This power is peculiar to
man and it is this marvelous intellectual capacity that enables man to
tower above the animal creation over which he was given dominion, just
as the snow-crowned mountain towers above the brooklet at its base. Fresh
from the hands of his Creator, Adam presented, in his physical, mental
and spiritual organisms, the acme of human perfection.
Eve, also fresh from the
hands of her Creator, presented, in her physical, mental and spiritual
organisms, the most sublime specimen of her lovely sex; upon whose fair
brow was stamped the image of her God. The scientists take up this theme.
Theodore Parker maintains: "THE WHITE DIFFERS FROM ALL OTHER RACES; he
is humane; he is civilized and progressive. He conquers with his head as
well as with his hands. It is intellect, after all, that conquers, not
the strength of man's arm. The White has often been the master of other
races never their slaves; except for brief periods when God was punishing
He has carried his religion
to other races -- but never taken theirs. All the great, limited forms
of monarchies are White. Republics are White. All the great sciences are
of White origin; all the inventions are White. Literature and romance come
from the same stock; all great poets are of White origin. No other race
can bring up to memory such celebrated names as the White race."
In his book, Moral and Intellectual
Diversity of Races, De Gobineau states: "The White Race has great vigor,
capacity and endurance. It has an intensity of will and desire which is
controlled by intellectually.
Great things are undertaken
readily, but not blindly. It manifests a strong utilitarianism, united
with a powerful imagination, which elevates, ennobles and idealizes its
practical ideas. The Negro can only imitate, the Chinese only utilize,
the work of the White, but the latter is abundantly capable of producing
He has as keen a sense of
order as the yellow man; not from the love of repose, however, but from
the desire to protect and preserve his acquisitions. He has a love of liberty
far more intense than exists in the black and yellow races, and clings
to life more earnestly. His high sense of honor is a faculty unknown to
other races and springs from an exalted sentiment of which they show no
indications. His sensations are less intense than in either the black or
yellow, but his mentality is far more developed and energetic."
Continue on to:- Part 13
Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books
Watch - Willie Martin