The Israel Truth - Part
Clearly the scriptures teach
that during the time of Israel's dispersion among the nations the heathen
would occupy their land.
Impostors: The prophets give
us some indication who the impostors would be that would lay claim to Israel's
inheritance during the time of their dispersion. There is clear evidence
that they would be of the Esau-Canaanite families. The Edomites or Idumeans
represent a significant branch of those attempting to stake out Israel's
inheritance during their exile from the land. The Edomites are addressed
in this prophecy from the prophet Obadiah. We read: "In the day that thou
stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers carried away
captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates, and cast lots
upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them. But you should not have
looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stronger;
neither should you have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the day
of their destruction; neither should you have spoken proudly in the day
of distress. You should not have entered into the gate of my people in
the day of their calamity; yea, you should not have looked on their
affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on their substance
in the day of their calamity; Neither should you have stood in the crossway,
to cut off those of his that did escape; neither should thou have delivered
up those of his that did remain in the day of distress." (Obadiah 10-14)
The Edomites took advantage
of Judah's captivity so as to wreak their revenge and hatred upon God's
people. The prophet Ezekiel also speaks of Edom's treachery "against the
house of Judah by TAKING VENGEANCE, and has greatly offended, and REVENGED
HIMSELF upon them." (Ezekiel 25:12)
In Ezekiel chapters 35 and
36, Edom is denounced for its actions in helping Israel's enemies in the
final overthrow of Jerusalem, where Edom had "shed the blood of the children
of Israel by the force of the sword in the time of their calamity." (Ezekiel
Edom acted with great vengeance
in their treacherous plan to invade Israel's land, to burn and pillage
it, and to destroy and kill the remnant of God's people that were left
Edom's nature was not to change in its desire to take advantage of
all opportunities for the destruction of the White Christian peoples, their
culture and civilization. Why? Because of Esau's animosity and jealousy
of Jacob possessing the birthright he once had.
Upon examination of the underlying
motives why the Edomite Jews would want to kill and destroy the White Christian
A). Since Esau had lost both
his birthright and blessings to Jacob, who was thus given dominion and
prosperity in the world by God, Esau has had a perpetual desire to take
revenge against Jacob. Esau wants the dominion and the blessings back,
and his envy and anger for Jacob possessing them in his stead had motivated
Esau to destroy Jacob. Now Edom must destroy and kill Israel for it is
the only way to get the revenge for Esau.
B). Jacob/Israel's birthright
and blessings include a status of dominion in the earth with God as their
head. This dominion conflicts with the Edomite Jews' plan of one-world
dominion. If Esau cannot have dominion according to God's plan, he will
have it according to his own plan. The two dominions cannot co-exist. If
all Israelites can be killed, then God's plan for Israel to have dominion
in the earth under Him cannot be fulfilled.
C). If Esau could have killed
Jacob as he originally planned, (Genesis 27:41) then as the only surviving
heir Esau would have regained the birthright. Similarly, if Esau would
have died when he still had the birthright, the birthright would have fallen
unto Jacob as the next oldest or only surviving son of Isaac. Because of
this law of inheritance, the Edomites in the world today believe that if
they can kill off every Israelite, they can regain the birthright and its
blessings as the only surviving heir.
D). The Edomites, who are
composed of Esau mixed with Canaanite people, also contain a significant
intermixture of the Judahites from the Babylonian captivity. There are
also Israelites who married into the Edomites. These are also Israelites
who married into the Edomites. These offspring from the Adamic race had
a right to the birthright but now as mongrels can never again claim that
heritage and thus lament over their hopeless fate. These descendants are
now a part of Edom and out of anguish and envy they desire to kill their
pure-blooded brethren. (Charles A. Weisman, Who is Esau-Edom?, pp. 94-95)
Esau/Edom may have other
motives to kill off God's people Israel but none are truly well-founded
on the law. Jacob lawfully possessed the birthright, and Edom, as a mongrel,
can no longer possess it. As with most motives for killing, the motives
of Esau for killing Jacob are based on passion and revenge, not on any
lawful right to action.
There is, those claiming
otherwise notwithstanding, a "conspiracy" to kill all of the White Christian
people from off the planet. Esau's motives for killing Jacob are all part
of a plot in God's plan. This is why we often see aggressive and harmful
actions being staged against the White Race, the possessors of the birthright.
It now becomes clear that the birthright plays a central role in understanding
many of the conflicts, wars, adversities and problems in the world.
When Esau heard that Isaac
had given Jacob the blessings of the birthright, "he cried out with an
exceedingly great and bitter cry." (Genesis 27:34) This is exactly what
the Jews do when they ear someone say they are not Israel, which means
they do not have the birthright. They cry out bitterly against them with
wails of "anti-Semitism." Meanwhile, these Edomites seek ways to kill the
real heirs to the birthright.
Many throughout history have
recognized this peculiar characteristic of the Jews to destroy Christians
but could never supply an adequate explanation as to why. Without understanding
who the characters in question are and how they relate to the birthright,
it becomes quite confusing to most observers.
Edom's (the Jews') desire
for revenge against Jacob/Israel was revealed by Edom's desire to see Jerusalem
destroyed when Israel possessed it, as revealed by the writer of Psalm
137: "Remember, O Lord, the children of Edom in the day of Jerusalem; who
said, Raze it, raze it, even to the foundation thereof." (Psalm 137:7)
The word "raze" means "to
tear down completely; level to the ground; demolish." (Webster's New World
Dictionary, Collins & World Pub. (1978)) When Jacob/Israel was at it
zenith in terms of national status and prosperity, Esau/Edom desired to
see its capital city destroyed.
The Edomites, being fewer
in number and subservient to Jacob, did not have the ability or might to
take out their revenge against Israel and Judah until they were weakened
by a civil war between them (734 B.C.). Judah had suffered the loss of
120,000 men in one day. (2 Chronicles 28:6) Another 200,000 of Judah's
inhabitants were taken captive by Israel along with much of its goods as
a spoil. (2 Chronicles 28:17) Thus, when Judah was torn by the ravages
of civil war, it was Edom who had rushed in and ransacked the land and
took the inhabitants into captivity.
Another episode of Edom's
treachery and revenge occurred when Judah was undergoing its final siege
from Babylon. After the enemy armies had captured Jerusalem in 586 B.C.,
Edom had treacherously participated in its destruction.
Rather than render aid when
the enemy was upon God's people, Edom, out of vengeance and revenge, invaded
Jerusalem and took part in the plunder of the stricken city. This violence
of Edom upon Judah was condemned by God: "For thy violence against thy
brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be cut off for ever.
In the day that thou stoodest on the other side, in the day that the strangers
carried away captive his forces, and foreigners entered into his gates,
and cast lots upon Jerusalem, even thou wast as one of them. But thou shouldest
not have looked on the day of thy brother in the day that he became a stranger;
neither shouldest thou have rejoiced over the children of Judah in the
day of their destruction; neither shouldest thou have spoken proudly in
the day of distress. Thou shouldest not have entered into the gate of my
people in the day of their calamity; yea, thou shouldest not have looked
on their affliction in the day of their calamity, nor have laid hands on
their substance in the day of their calamity; Neither shouldest thou have
stood in the crossway, to cut off those of his that did escape; neither
shouldest thou have delivered up those of his that did remain in the day
of distress." (Obadiah 1:10-14)
The Edomites (Jews) took
advantage of Judah's captivity so as to wreck their revenge and hatred
upon God's people. The prophet Ezekiel also speaks of Edom's treachery
"against the house of Judah by TAKING VENGEANCE, and has greatly offended,
and REVENGED HIMSELF upon them." (Ezekiel 25:12)
The ways and characteristics
of Esau/Edom do not change, and thus this treachery against God's Israel
people can and did recur again; in America, in the 1860s, with the American
Civil War. Here was a war not only planned and instigated by the Jews,
such as the Rothschilds, but both sides were financed by Jewish banks.
When the Southern states
laid devastated in the aftermath of the war, the Jewish/Marxist plan of
reconstruction was established to further destroy the White rule and culture.
The South was put under military government and Whites were deprived of
their rights, their Constitutions, and their property.
Entire plantations were destroyed,
burned and pillaged to deny the White Southerners their inheritance. Entire
White Southern families were murdered and their property given to Negroes
and to Jewish financiers.
Other Jewish carpetbaggers
from the North, such as the Lehmans, the "seven liberal-minded" Seligman
brothers, the Baruchs, and other special emissaries of the Rothschilds,
came to seize from the widows and orphans of the Confederate dead their
last savings, their last possessions, and their lands and homes.
The Israel Truth - Part 14
It was during the period right after the Civil War that the KKK was
created. The reason for the origin of this organization was because the
union soldiers were being used by the Jews to murder the owner and his
entire family of a business, farm or ranch and giving it to some black
So the confederate soldiers joined together and began killing blacks
so they would be afraid to accept the land or business that the union soldiers
were offering them. For every time a southern family was murdered and their
land or business was given to some black, the riders of the KKK would then,
in turn, kill the black and his entire family in revenge. Oh that our modern
day southerners had the same courage as our ancestors.
At any rate the Jews did not care how many blacks were killed, they
have always hated the blacks but the blacks are too stupid to understand
that and who their enemy really is; but when the riders of the KKK started
to exact revenge upon the Jews that is when the Jews turned their wrath
upon the KKK. But for many years the organization was too strong to be
hurt by the Jews or their spies. It has only been in the last 60 or 70
years that the leadership of the KKK has become so lax that federal agents
can infiltrate with ease and undermine their efforts.
John Wessely Hardin was just one of many ex-confederate
soldiers outlawed because of this treachery by the union soldiers. When
he returned home from the war, he found that his entire family, his father,
mother, brothers, sisters, grand parents and etc., had been murdered by
union soliders and their land given to a black family. After he killed
all the blacks in revenge, he started out to find the troop of union soldiers
who had murdered his family. When he found them he attached some eight
pistols, two shotguns, to his saddle and carrying two more double barrel
shotguns he rode his horse into the saloon where the union troop had stopped
to eat and drink before riding on to murder more southerners.
He rode into the bar with both shotguns blazing and
he quickly drew one after the other of the weapons and shot until they
were empty and then he went after what was left with his bowie knife. When
he finally was finished and he left the bar all of the union soldiers were
dead, shot to death or had their throats cut. And from that time on he
was considered an outlaw.
He lived as long as he did because most of the southern
lawmen knew why he was an outlaw and they would have done the same thing
if they had been in his place. Plus the fact that he was completely fearless
in battle and they knew that if they attacked him it was kill or be killed.
This mode of treachery of Edom again surfaced during World War II. When
Germany had been defeated at the end of the war, and the Allied forces
had suppressed its military and rendered it defenseless, it was the Edomite
Jews, with the aid of the Edomite Jew Dwight D. Eisenhower, of the Red
Soviet Union that had poured into the nation to rape, plunder, destroy
and kill Germans.
As with Judah, the Edomite Jews "shed the blood" of Germans "by force
of the sword in the time of their calamity." This act was a typical Edomite
style of revenge upon God's people (Germany). Esau/Edom always, whenever
possible, attacks and plunders Jacob/Israel only when they are in a weakened
and helpless state.
In February, 1945, when the war was almost over, the city of Dresden
was repeatedly bombed and destroyed to satisfy the hate and revenge of
the Jews. Dresden was the culture center of German and not a military or
industrial target. Over 250,000 men, women and children were slaughtered
by the half-Jew Churchill (This will be difficult for many to believe,
one can hear them say, what:, England do that to this country? Why they
are our greatest ally, we could not do without them. Let us look at the
record and see just how much love there is for us in this pretended friendship.
To begin with, when we were at war with Spain, this great Churchill,
"Churchill entered British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces and
fired on the American forces. It was a little embarrassing when the Honorable
William Langer of North Dadota made this announcement on the floor of the
United States Senate. Mr. Churchill was in this country, because you know,
we never hit a man behind his back, he was going to speak in Boston, a
little more of the Churchillian propaganda. Learning that this statement
had been made by the patriotic Senator Langer, Mr. Churchill was a little
upset, he sent a telegram to the Honorable Tom Connally denying the fact.
Good Friend, as he was, Senator Connally rose to his feet and read the
telegram to the Senate.
Little did they realize that the records were available, that already
these facts had been read to the Senate and were in the Congressional Record.
Once again Senator Langer read the record to the Senate. Mr. Churchill
is a brilliant man, but how stupid to try to deny what he has sanctioned
in his biography, for you will find the record in World's Who's Who and
a very good account in International Who's Who. The preface to these books
states "This volume contains an authentic record of notable men and women
throughout the world, page 114, 1940 edition: 'Winston Churchill...He entered
the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces against the American
forces in Cuba."
International Who's Who, page 158, published by Europe Publications
Ltd. London, 39 Belford Square, W.C. 1 the 13th edition, states: "Churchill
entered the army in 1895, served in Cuba with Spanish forces against the
Americans. The preface in this book states, 'We wish to express our thanks
to all those who, by completing questionnaires or by correcting proofs
sent to them have enabled us to bring information up to date and to remind
others that unless proofs are returned, no responsibility can be accepted
for the accuracy of their biographical records."
In 1946, the Biographical Encyclopedia of the World repeats: "Churchill
entered the British Army 1895, serving with the Spanish forces in Cuba."
Webster's Biographical Dictionary, 1st edition by G. & C Merriam,
publishers, Springfield, Mass., also states that "Churchill served in Cuba
with the Spanish forces."
Current Biography, 1940 edition, published by H.W. Wilson Co., 950 University
Avenue, New York City also states: "Churchill: He was with the Spanish
forces in Cuba." It was repeated in 1942. It is here that we find Churchill
quoted: "He had always thought it a pity that it all had to be so make
believe, and that the age of wars between civilized nations had come to
an end forever, now he, at least had an opportunity to join civilized Spain
in a war against uncivilized Cuba."
Robert's account of Winston Churchill, 1928, Robert H. McBride, publishers,
page 32, through Sir Henry Drummond, ambassador at Madrid, (Spain) Churchill:
He joined the Spanish forces in Cuba in 1895. Spain conferred the 'Order
of Military Merit, 1st class.'"
While the New York Times, which prints "all the news that is fit to
print," in their issue of September 19, 1945 states: "Churchill fought
with Spain in Cuba." (And Men Wept, by Catherine Palfrey Baldwin)) (England)
and the Jewish President of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt. (Little
has been published about the early life of Abraham Lincoln. However, during
a search of some old property records and will in a small courthouse in
central North Carolina, Alex Christopher the author of "Pandora's Box,";
in one of the old will books dated around 1840, he found the will of one
A.A. Springs. Upon reading the will he was shocked and amazed at the secret
that it disclosed, but one must remember that it is a known fact that wills,
even though they are classified public records the same as property and
corporation records, they are rarely combed through as he was doing at
the time, and these records hold many dark secrets that can be hidden in
public view, but are never uncovered because there are very few who research
these old records.
This practice of hiding secrets in public view and the conspirators
can say, when faced with the facts and accused of concealing the records;
they can reply "Well it was there in the public record in plan view for
any and all to find." In the will of A.A. Springs was the list of his property.
it went into detail to whom the property was to be dispersed and it included
his children. Mr. Christopher and others were looking to find what railroads
and banks this man might have owned and had left to his son Leroy Springs.
He didn't find anything like that, but he did find the prize of the century.
On the bottom of page three of four pages was a paragraph where the father,
A.A. Springs, left to his son an enormous amount of land in the state of
Alabama which amounted to the land that is today known as Huntsville, Alabama
and then he went into detail to name the son and at first Mr. Christopher
and the others with him couldn't believe what they were seeing, but there
it was the name of the son and it was "ABRAHAM LINCOLN!"
This new information that they had about the Springs (real name Springstein)
family, this was just another twist to add to the already manipulative
family. This new information about Lincoln built a fire under them to see
where this new lead would take them, because everything they had found
in the railroad and banking saga had been areal mind-bender. They figured
this one would be the same; so they inquired at the local archives and
historical records on families and found a reference to one Abraham Lincoln
in the family genealogy of the family of the Carolina by the name of McAdden,
in a published genealogy on the family. The family members in the Carolinas
were in a limited edition that at one time could be found in the public
libraries. The section on Lincoln and the story went something like the
following: "In the late spring of the year of 1808 Nancy Hanks, who was
of the family lineage of the McAdden family was visiting some of her family
in the community of Lincolnton, North Carolina. While on her stay with
family in the Carolina', she vistaed with many of the neighboring families
that she had known for many years; one such visit was the Springs family.
The sordid details had been omitted but obviously the young Nancy Hanks
had found herself in a compromised position and was forced to succumb to
the lust of A.A. Springs. She became pregnant as a result. There were no
details of a love affair or an act of violence on a helpless female. Abraham
Lincoln was the result of that act, which leads one to wonder if the name
Lincoln was real or a fabricated name for the are of conception was Lincolnton.
Was there really a Thomas Lincoln? Since the Spring were of the race that
called themselves Jewish, that made Lincoln part Jewish and as part of
the Springs family, he also became a relative of the Rothschild family
The Israel Truth - Part 15
The following information
was derived from information that exists in the Smithsonian, National Archives,
the Congressional Library, Courtroom Police files, public and private libraries
and storage vaults across the United States and Europe: "Abraham Lincoln
was slapped three times with a white glove by a member of the Hapsburg
royal family of Germany (Payseur family relatives) during a White House
reception in 1862. The German royal family member demanded a pistol duel
with the, then, President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln. The blows
to the face stunned Lincoln but he non-verbally refused to participate
in the duel by bowing his head before walking out of the reception room.
What had ol' honest Abe done to so enrage and up-set the royal European
It seems that the practice
of promiscuity was running rampant in many families in those days and the
German King Leopold had, had an illegitimate daughter named Elizabeth who
was sent to America, where she lived in a very comfortable manner. Although
Leopold could not recognize her position, he was very interested in her
In the early or mid 1850s,
Abraham Lincoln and Elizabeth began having sexual liaisons that produced
twin daughters named Ella and Emily in 1856. The regal German father who
was so royally up-set with ol' honest Abe probably had full knowledge of
what the true blood line of Lincoln really was. Abraham's wife, Mary Todd
Lincoln, did not find out about Elizabeth, Ella and Emily until 1865. Previous
to being informed about Elizabeth and the twins, Mrs. Lincoln had developed
a ravaging dependency on opium. Her main supplier of the drug was a former
member of the Confederate Intelligence community, he was a former member
because the Southern gentlemen did not approve of his drug pushing and
unreliable behavior. It was because of his involvement with the Souther
Intelligence Community, Mary's supplier - John Wilks Booth - knew about
the lover and the illegal twins.
After being spurned by the
Confederate intelligence community, Mary's 'candy man' approached and became
involved with the Rothschild Empire of Europe, for he realized the European
banking moguls would be very interested in his pipeline to the White House.
(At this time) Abraham was
searching for an issue that would unite the North and South AFTER the Civil
War ended. The issue needed to be popular to all levels of American citizenry
so they could 'rally around the Stars and Stripes' thus rapidly healing
the wounds of the bloodiest war in history. Lincoln was seriously considering
one major movement or event that would galvanize his fellow Northern and
Southern patriot countrymen into cutting loose the United States of America
from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs bloodline of banking control
in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were trying to take control of
the entire world monetary system, and at that time the Rothschilds were
trying to get a foot-hold in America and find a way around the British,
Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that were gaining control in
this country through government help...
Lincoln found himself in
real hot water, because under the Virginia Company covenant the 48 families
that formed it were all of the Holy Grail Bloodline. This country was to
be an extension of what all the royal families of Europe controlled. The
royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what their name is. The royal
family of England is one such example. Now what Lincoln did is he wanted
to become independent of the cogenant (in favor of his family) on the Rothschild
side...the Rothschilds and their family bloodline have always been undermining
the affairs of the Hapsbergs and stealing the monetary control away from
them. No matter what the history books say, the Rothschilds didn't get
(total) real control on things in America and the Federal Reserve until
the Springs usurped the Payseur family companies in the early 1920s...
(But Lincoln had fallen from
Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part to his Executive Order to print
United States Greenbacks, thus interfering with the Jewish International
Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild family wanted Lincoln embarrassed
to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's drug dealer (John Wilks Booth)
was hired to kidnap the President of the United States. Abraham would be
put on a boat for a two month cruise of the Atlantic where he would be
injected with and addicted to opium and then dumped on the streets of Washington.
While the forcefully addicted President was stumbling around our nation's
capital, the press would be informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.
The drug pusher (Booth) and
collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds had his perfect accomplice in the
plot to kidnap and discredit the leader of the North American continent
in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After being informed of Abe's lover
and the twins and the kidnap plot by her drug supplier, Mary was promised
that after her husband resigned or was impeached, she and Abe would be
moved to Europe to live happily ever after with plenty of opium. Superficially
Mary expressed a desire to live in Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil
War or politics to distract her husband or family. But her drug suppler
had totally underestimated the confusion, desperation and anger of Mary
The plotters decided the
Presidential snatch needed to take place in a public, yet discreet location
where minimum witnesses would be present. There were too many potential
witnesses at the White House. Two hours before the capture was to take
place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum, because Abe had decided not
to go out of the White House that night. Mary's outrageous outburst caused
Abe to change his mind and the First family departed. Several minutes after
arriving at the kidnap location, Mary instructed the family bodyguard to
take a position that placed the First Family out of his visual sight. The
position also required the bodyguard to traverse several flights of stairs
to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed for any reason...A wagon with
a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of the kidnap location with
several men including Mary's opium supplier. The plan was for the drug
pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently move down a hallway,
and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary and Abe were
After entering the room,
Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President an urgent message was
waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending down the backstairs,
Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The kidnappers would load
the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly stow Lincoln on an opium
boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean. When Booth actually opened
the door to the darkened room where Abe and Mary were sitting, he went
into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with his head on Mary's left shoulder
and the First Lady had her head turned toward the left looking at the door...When
she was sure the man who opened the door was Booth, she turned and looked
at the President to be sure the pistol she was pointing would explode beneath
the lower left earlobe of her husband.
Before Mary pulled the trigger,
John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to the First Lady, realized he was the
patsy in all this mess. But he did not know if he was only Mary's patsy
or also a chump for the Rothschild family. Were the men hiding around the
back door of Ford's Theater there to help Booth with the kidnaping or there
to point the false finger at the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about
to run into the hallway or down the backstairs to find out the answer to
that question. The only escape route was to jump the balcony and crash
onto the stage during the performance. That night, Booth gave a literal
interpretation of the theatrical phrase 'brake a leg' as he fractured one
of his during his leaping act from 'lethally looney Mary' and the men lurking
around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.
In a novelty case on a wall
in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin)
were to kill a head of state, they would use a revolver, because several
bullets might be needed to accomplish the murder and stop any guards during
the escape. One would only use a one-shot pistol if they were absolutely
sure they had intimate access to the victim. The gun on the wall of Ford's
Theater is a derringer-the perfect weapon for the left handed female assassin
who did not attend her husbands funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her
room due to overwhelming grief and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room
with two armed guards for two weeks after killing her husband.
In the 1860s, an act of Congress
mandated the compensation of widows of former and active Congressmen, Senators,
Vice Presidents and Presidents. The mouth and duration was ratified by
both Houses of Congress for each widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her
widowers compensation three times and was denied the mandated compensation
three times by both Houses of Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for
Mary's passage to Europe where she died in small cottage in Germany.
In 1867, the Secret Service
was founded so that drunken municipal law enforcement could not unwittingly
participate with drug-addicted First Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow
killings of philandering Presidents of the United States. (To cover up
the murders committed which would reflect a bad light for the presiding
Administration, such as the Foster murder is doing at the present time).
Before Booth jumped out of
the balcony of the Presidential Box of the Ford Theater, he shouted at
General Riley and his wife who were sitting to the right-front of the Lincolns.
Booth's words expressed his innocence but also sealed the fate of the Rileys.
Within a week of the shooting, General Riley and his wife were packed off
to an insane asylum where they both died of 'unknown causes' within 30
days of being committed." (Pandora's Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286))
The persecution and destruction
of White Christian people by the Jews is not a recent thing but reaches
far back into history. Writing in the April, 1921 issue of the "Hebrew
Christian Alliance Quarterly," the Rev. M. Malbert stated: "I am going
to show that real religious persecution is uniquely Jewish...In the time
of Justinian, in the sixth century, the Jews massacred Christians in Caesarea
and destroyed their churches. When Stephanus, the governor, attempted to
defend the Christians, the Jews fell on him and slew him. In 608 A.D. the
Jews of Antioch fell upon their Christian neighbors and killed them with
fire and sword...About 614 A.D. the Persians advanced upon Palestine and
the Jews, after joining their standard, massacred the Christians and destroyed
their churches. Ninety thousand Christians perished in Jerusalem alone."
(The International Jew, Vol. IV (1922), pp. 171, 173)
Perhaps the greatest act
of revenge, treachery and hatred perpetrated by the Jews was their destruction
and takeover of the white-ruled and Christian Nation of Russia. Here we
have a premeditated and cold-blooded plan to destroy the White Government
and People of this nation.
The Israel Truth - Part 16
The prophet Ezekiel also
identifies the Idumeans as those claiming the land of Israel. We read:
"Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Surely in the fire of my jealousy have
I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea, which
have appointed my land into their possession, with the joy of all their
heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey." (Ezekiel 36:5)
Yes, the Idumeans (which
is another name for the Edomites (Edom is in "Modern Jewry," Jewish Encyclopedia,
1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41)) had appointed Israel's land as their own
possession. The descendants of these Edomite-Canaanites have laid claim
to the land ever since Israel was first exiled.
In fact, the Canaanite was
in the land from the beginning, since the days of Abraham. The declaration
of 1948 was only a continuation of an age old attempt to steal the heritage
of Israel and lay claim to their land. But, rest assured, the prophets
have foretold it all. The clearest indictment of these heathen impostors
comes from those scriptures that speak of the time when Israel would be
restored to their land and reclaim their inheritance.
The prophets give us clear
indication that the Israelites would repossess their land from an heathen
people, which would be called by God's name! Yes, these people would call
themselves Israel. This passage from the prophet Amos addresses the reestablishment
of the Davidic monarchy and the people's repossession of the land. We read:
"In that day I will raise up the tabernacle of David that is fallen, and
close up the breaches thereof; and I will raise up his ruins, and I will
build it as in the days of old: That they may possess the remnant of Edom,
and of all the heathen which are called by my name, saith the Lord that
doeth this...And I will plant them upon their land, and they shall no more
be pulled up out of their land." (Amos 9:11-15)
This is a clear reference
to the fact that the remnant of Edom would be in the land and that they
would be called by God's name, that is Israel! Moreover, the True Israelites
would repossess the land from these heathen people.
The other prophets confirm
the identity of those from whom Israel would repossess the land. In Obadiah
we read: "The house of Jacob shall possess their possession. And the house
of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house of Joseph a flame, and the house
of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle in them, and devour them; and
there shall not be any remaining of the house of Esau...And the captivity
of this host of the children of Israel shall possess that of the Canaanites,
even unto Zarephath." (Obadiah 17-20)
Again, we have reference
to the Edomites and the Canaanites. The scriptures clearly tell us these
heathen peoples would be in the land when Israel returned to possess it.
This prophecy from Zechariah also confirms the presence the Canaanite in
the land. We read: "In that day shall there be upon the bells of the horses,
holiness unto the Lord; and the pots of the Lord's house shall be like
the bows before the altar. Yea, every pot in Jerusalem and in Judah shall
be holiness unto the Lord of hosts: and all they that sacrifice shall come
and take of them, and seethe therein: and in that day there shall be no
more the Canaanite in the house of the Lord of hosts." (Zechariah 14:21)
Yes, in that day there shall
be no more the Canaanite in Jerusalem, nor in all the land. These heathen
impostors who now call themselves Israel will be cast out for evermore,
never again to return and lay claim to the heritage of Israel. Truly, they
are the heathen called by God's name, as foretold by the prophet Amos.
There is written in the prophets
a number of passages foretelling that a heathen people would lay claim
to the land and inheritance of Israel during the time of their dispersion
among the nations. The scriptures identify these impostors specifically
as descendants of the Edomite-Canaanite families. These heathen people
would even claim to be Israel. (Revelation 2:9; 3:9)
The prophets say they would
called by God's name, indicating they would be called Israel. Only with
an historic understanding of that idiom can it be known that a heathen
people would assume Israel's heritage and claim that name once given to
Looking at world events today,
we have confirmation of all that has been written. Surely the words of
the prophets have come to pass as there is in the land today another people
called by My name. It is a battle between Christianity and Judeo- Christianity.
It has only been in recent times that after the people we know, today,
as Jews, became familiar with Christian literature, they began to name
their religion Judaism.
Rabbi Stephen Wise, one of
the main Jewish leaders in the United States a few years ago, stated that
when the Jews returned to Jerusalem from Babylon (with the True Israelites),
about 536 B.C., they brought with them the teachings which became known
as the Babylonian Talmud. "This was the end of Hebrewism, and the beginning
of Judaism," the learned Rabbi stated.
As Christians it has become
of vital interest that we know what kind of a religion Judaism actually
is. We know it has been accepted by most of the evangelical and fundamental
Christians as the religion of Ancient Israel and the Bible. But is it really
the religion of the Biblical prophets who over and over again foretold
that Jesus and His disciples practiced when He was in His earthly body
on this earth? It is the religion we read about in the pages of the Old
Or is it a cleverly conceived,
Satanic religion which is so clever, that in the words of Jesus: "...if
it were possible, they would deceive the very elect." These "elect" are
not Jews, since the Jews are never referred to in the pages of the Holy
Writ as "the elect." This term is used on in connection with "True Israel."
It would be difficult to
get a better answer for this thorny question, than by going directly to
Jewish sources. Rabbi Bakker writes: "This is not an uncommon impression
and one find it sometimes among the Jews as well as Christians, that Judaism
is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is of course a fallacious impression."
The Rabbis of Judaism understand
this just as do the leaders in the Christian movement. Rabbi Moshe Maggal
of the National Jewish Information Service said in 1961 when the term Judeo-Christian
was relatively new, "There is no such thing as a Judeo-Christian Religion.
We consider the two religions so different that one excludes the other."
(National Jewish Information Service)
A Hoax: It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy
of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to
all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context
is also absurd was well stated in the author-initiative religious journal,
Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department
of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote:
"As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more
fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity;
and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually
referred to as the Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian
or Secularist Fantasy."
We need to note here, that
the Babylonian Talmud is the textbook of modern Rabbinism and is the "hearts
blood" of the Jewish religion. According to their own leaders, it supersedes
any other religious writing.
Rabbi Louis Finkelstein,
one of the leading authorities on Judaism asserted: "Phariseeism became
Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism
became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name...The spirit
of the ancient pharisee survives unaltered." We would also remind you that
it was to these Pharisees Jesus Christ, the Son of God, directed His sternest
In John 10:26, speaking directly
to these religious frauds of His day, He said: "But ye (Pharisees) believe
not, because ye are not of my sheep..." That should be clear to anyone
who is a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ; that the Jews are not Israelites!
In a serially produced installment
of a best-seller by Jewish author Herman Wouk, we find the heading "The
Talmudic Heart's Blood of the Jewish Faith." He says: "The Talmud is to
this day the circulating heart's blood of the Jewish religion. Whatever
laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe, whether we are Orthodox, Conservative,
Reformed or merely spasmodic sentimentalists, we follow the Talmud. It
is our Common Law!"
The beginning of Talmudic
literature dates back to the time of the Babylonian exile in the 6th Century
B.C...a thousand years later, in Alexandria, Egypt, these traditions of
men were finally set down in codified form. When all the frills and mystery
is removed from the Talmud, it boils down to the "traditions of the elders,"
which Jesus so venomously denounced in His ministry. (Matthew 15:3,6,9;
In Matthew 15:2, we listen
as Christ asks the scribes (lawyers) and the Pharisees: "Why do ye also
transgress the commandment of God by your tradition?" In verse 9 He enlarged
on this evil by saying: "But in vain do they (scribes and Pharisees) worship
me (God), teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
The Israel Truth - Part 17
A full and complete story
about these scribes and Pharisees is related in the chapter 29 of the Book
of Isaiah. "Woe to Ariel, (#740 Strong's Concordance - name for Jerusalem)
to Ariel, the city where David dwelt add ye year to year; let them kill
sacrifices. Yet I will distress Ariel, and there shall be heaviness and
sorrow: and it shall be unto me as Ariel. And I will camp against thee
round about, and will lay siege against thee with a mount, and I will raise
forts against thee. And thou shalt be brought down, and shalt speak out
of the ground, and thy speech shall be low out of the dust. Moreover the
multitude of thy strangers shall be like small dust, and the multitude
of the terrible ones shall be as chaff that passeth away: yea, it shall
be at an instant suddenly. Thou shalt be visited of the Lord of hosts with
thunder, and with earthquake, and great noise, with storm and tempest,
and the flame of devouring fire. And the multitude of all the nations that
fight against Ariel, even all that fight against her and her monition ,
and that distress her, shall be as a dream of a night vision. It shall
be as when an hungry man dreameth, and behold, he eateth; but he awaketh,
and his soul is empty; or as when a thirsty man dreameth, and, behold,
he drinketh; but he awaketh, and behold, he is faint, and his soul hath
appetite: so shall the multitude of all the nations be that fight against
mount Zion. Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are
drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink. For
the Lord hath poured out upon you (scribes, Pharisees - Jews) the spirit
of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers
the seers hath he covered. And the vision of all is become unto you as
the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned,
saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed:
And the book is delivered to him that is not learnedand saying, Read this,
I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned. Where said, Forasmuch
as this people (scribes, Pharisees - Jews) draw near me with their mouth,
and with their lips do honor me, but have removed their heart far from
me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men (Traditions
of Men - The Talmud): Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvelous
work among this people, even a marvelous work and a wonder: for the wisdom
of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent
men shall be hid. Woe unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from
the Lord, and their works are in the dark, and they say, Who seeth us?
and who knoweth us? Surely your turning of things upside down shall be
esteemed as the potter's clay: for shall the work say of him that made
it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it,
He had no understanding?" (Isaiah 29:1-16)
In Mark 7:7 we find this
same accusation followed by another in verse 9: "...Full well ye reject
the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition." And in verse
13, He said that these religious and political leaders, "Made the word
of God of none effect through their tradition."
The Talmud, did not appear
in writing form until centuries after the Christian world came into existence.
The Talmud comes from Mishaic Hebrew and means "learning, teaching, instruction."
It was at first passed on by word of mouth. By the time it appeared in
written form about 500 A.D. it contained much which was viciously anti-Christ
and anti-Christian. This has resulted in what today is known erroneously
as "anti-Semitism." We say "erroneous," since the vast majority of those
people who call themselves Jews, are of Turco-Mongolian (Khazars), rather
than Semitic in origin.
Nothing is more thrilling
to a genuine Christian than to hear the name of Jesus Christ uplifted and
exalted and to listen to the marvelous promises made by their King to those
who will remain faithful to Him. So, when they hear His wonderful name
blasphemed, degraded and associated with filth, their reaction is anger
against those who promote such beliefs. Doesn't it seem strange that only
one religion in the world attacks the teachings and person of Jesus Christ?
The Mohammedans honor Him
as a great prophet and other religions recognize Him as a great spiritual
leader; only in Judaism is Jesus, the Son of God, degraded and called the
"son of a whore." The Talmud tale is told that, because of talking to a
Christian Disciple of Jesus, a rabbi is suspected of being pro- Christian,
which makes him deeply ashamed. He tells the lie that Jesus taught that
the hire of a harlot may be used to build a privy for the high priest.
(Abodah Zarah 16b-17a)
This last pleased the rabbi
very much. This filthy and false story to defame Christ is used in a typical
Pharisee lie by Rabbi Louis Finklestein in his publication "The Pharisees."
(See pages xv-xvi of the Foreword) Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin), who made
the first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud, asks, in the section
on the History of the Talmud: "Is the literature that Jesus was familiar
with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for
us to get at it?...To such inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis
answer by holding up the Talmud...The Talmud then, is the written form
of that which, in the time of Jesus, was called the Traditions of the Elders,
and to which he makes frequent allusions."
The Talmud and Mary, Mother
of Jesus, she is called; "Miriam, a dresser of women's hair." She "committed
adultery." (Sanhedrin 69a) "She played the harlot with carpenters." (Sanhedrin
All the rabbinical sources
ascribe to Jesus, "illegitimate birth...the seducer was a soldier by the
name of Panthera [also called Pandira, and stada]."; "Pappus [husband of
Mary] has nothing to do with the story of Jesus, and was only connected
with it because his wife happened to be called 'Miriam' [Mary] and was
known to be an adulteress."
All the life of Jesus (Toledot
Yeshu), "editions contain a similar story of a dispute which Jesus carried
on with the scribes who on the ground of that dispute declared him to be
a bastard." (Jewish Encyclopedia, "Jesus.")
Christ is referred to as
"Balaam" in the most lewd Talmud passages concerning Him. Proof that Jesus
is called "Balaam" is found in the Jewish Encyclopedia (under "Balaam")
which, after enumerating His alleged loathsome qualities, states: "Hence...the
pseudonym 'Balaam' given to Jesus in Sanhedrin 106a and Gittin 57a."
In the same article, we are
told that the Talmud likens the Gospel Christians and Christ to Baal sex-worshipers
because of whose abominations 24,000 Israelites died of plague at the time
of Balaam. (Numbers 25:1-9) Because Balaam had been asked to curse the
Israelites but instead did not foretold the coming Messiah, (Numbers 24:17)
the flimsy pretext is made that Jesus was a curse like Balaam. "He (Christ)
is pictured as blind in one eye and lame in one foot and his disciples
distinguished by three morally corrupt qualities..." He is called "one
that ruined a people," and His churches are likened to nudist Baal worship.
And, "this hostility against
his memory finds it climax in the dictum that whenever one discovers a
feature of wickedness or disgrace in his life, one should preach about
it." (Sanhedrin 106b)
Jesus, as stated in both
the Talmud and Jewish Encyclopedia, gets "four legal methods of execution"
and is Crucified as well, as a blasphemer of Pharisee Judaism.
Jesus stoned, then "hanged"
or crucified (Sanhedrin 43a-45b; 67a); where under another phony name (Ben
Stada);. (Jewish Encyclopedia) Jesus crucified as a "blasphemer" (Sanhedrin
46a; Jewish Encyclopedia); Jesus burned (Sanhedrin 52a); manner of burning
(Yebamoth 6b); verified by Jewish Encyclopedia under "Balaam." He (Christ)
is; "lowered into dung up to his armpits then a hard cloth was placed within
a soft one, wound round his neck and the two loose ends pulled in opposite
directions forcing him to open his mouth. A wick was then lit, and thrown
into his mouth so that it descended into his body and burnt his bowels...his
mouth was forced open with pincers against his wishes." (Sanhedrin 52a)
And: "The death penalty of
'burning' was executed by pouring molten lead through the condemned man's
mouth into his body, burning his internal organs." (Yebamoth 12b)
Jesus strangled: "He was
lowered into dung up to his armpits then a hard cloth was placed within
a soft one, wound round his neck, and the two ends pulled in opposite directions
until he was dead." (Sanhedrin 52a; 106a. Jewish Encyclopedia)
Jesus in hell where His punishment
is "boiling in hot semen." (Gittin 57a) The subject is identified as Jesus
in a footnote, also in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Balaam." Jesus "committed
bestiality," "corrupted the people," is "turned into hell." (Sanhedrin
105a) Jesus "limped on one foot' and 'was blind in one eye.'" "he practiced
enchantment by means of his membrum," "he committed bestiality with his
ass," he was a fool who "did not even know his beats's mind." (Sanhedrin
The ridiculous and foul misuse
of Judges 5:27 about Sisera's dying convulsions meaning sexual intercourse
is here applied to Jesus, with a footnote "explanation" of Judges 5:27:
"This is taken to mean sexual intercourse..."
Jesus attempts to seduce
women, is excommunicated by a rabbi and then worships a brick, was a seducer
of Israel, and practiced magic. (Sanhedrin 107b; Jewish Encyclopedia) Jesus
is cited in the index of the Sanhedrin portion of the Talmud, "chief repository
of the criminal law of the Talmud," which shows the page numbers where
he is denounced.
Jesus' resurrection is cured:
"Woe unto him who maketh himself alive by the name of God." (Sanhedrin
The trial of Jesus: "It was
the action of the priests that Jesus was sent before Pontius Pilate."
The Israel Truth - Part 18
The Sanhedrin priests; "had
the most reason to be offended with Jesus' action in cleansing the Temple,"
the probable place of His trial, according to the Talmud. His cry: "My
god, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?...was in all its implications itself
a disproof of the exaggerated claims made for him. The very form of his
punishment would disprove these claims in Jewish eyes. No Messiah that
Jews could recognize could suffer such a death; for 'He that is hanged
is accursed of God.' (Deuteronomy 21:23) This refers to an 'evil son' and
Talmudist Rashi adds 'an insult to God.'" (Jewish Encyclopedia under "Jesus.")
Other foul charges against Jesus and His mother, His being a "bastard,"
and the like, follow.
Of course the Talmud does
not mention Jesus by name, but the footnotes and context clearly show He
is the one they are referring to. The Jewish Encyclopedia states that Jewish
legends regarding Jesus are found in three sources (In Jewish Legend: The
Jewish legends in regard to Jesus are found in three sources, each independent
of the others (1) New Testament apocrypha and Christian polemical works,
(2) in the Talmud and the Midrash, and (3) in the life of Jesus ("Toledot
Yeshu'") that originated in the Middle Ages. It is the tendency of all
these sources to belittle the person of Jesus by ascribing in him illegitimate
birth, magic, and a shameful death. In view of their general character
they are called indiscriminately legends. Some of the statements, as that
referring to magic, are found among pagan writers and Christian heretics:
and as the Ebolonites, or Judeo-Christians who for a long time lived together
with the Jews, are also classed as heretics, conclusions may be drawn from
this as to the origin of these legends.
It ought also to be added
that many of the legends have a theological background. For polemical purposes,
it was necessary for the Jews to insists on the illegitimacy of Jesus as
against the David descent claimed by the Christian church. Magic may have
been ascribed him over against the miracles recorded in the Gospels; and
the degrading fate both on earth and hereafter of which the legends speak
may be simply directed against the ideas of the assumption and the resurrection
of Jesus. The Jewish legends relating to Jesus appear less inimical in
character when compared with the parallel passages which more especially
as such legends are fixed and frequently occurring themes of folk- lore;
and imaginations must have been especially excited by the historical importance
which the figure of Jesus came to have for the Jews.
The earliest authenticated
passage ascribing illegitimate birth to Jesus as that in Yeb. iv.8. The
mysterious phrase ("that man") cited in this passage as occurring in a
family register which R. Simeon ben Azza is said to have found seems to
indicate that it refers to Jesus, and here occur also the two expressions
so often applied to Jesus in later literature ("that anonymous one," the
name of Jesus being avoided") and (-"bastard": for which in later times
was used). Such a family register may have been preserved at Jerusalem
in the Judeo-Christian community.
The Jews, who are represented
as inimical to Jesus in the canonical Gospels also, took him to be legitimate
and born in an entirely pastoral manner. A contrary statement as to their
attitude is expressed for the first time in the "Acts of Pilate" ("Gospel
of Nicodemus,") Celaus makes the same statement in another passage, where
he refers to a written source, adding that the seducer was a soldier by
the name of Panthera.
The name "Panthera" occurs
here for the first time; two centuries later it occurs in Epiphanius, who
ascribes the surname "Panther" to Jacob, an ancestor of Jesus; and John
of Damascus...includes the names "Panther" and "Barpanther" in the genealogy
of Mary. It is certain, in any case, that the rabbinical sources also regard
Jesus as the "son of Pandera." Although it is noteworthy that he is called
also "Ben Stada."
It appears from this passage
that, aside from Pandera and Stada, the couple Pappus b. Judah and Miriam
the hairdresser were taken to be the parents of Jesus. Pappus has nothing
to do with the story of Jesus, and was only connected with it because his
wife happened to be cited "Miriam" (="Mary"), and was known to be an adulteress.
The one statement in which
all these confused legends agree is that relating to the birth of Jesus.
Although this is ascribed only to the Jews, even in Celsus, the Jews need
not necessarily be regarded as its authors, for it is possible that it
originated among heretics inimical to Jesus, as the Ophites and Cainites,
of whom Origen says "they uttered such hateful accusations against Jesus
as Celsus himself did" ("Contra Celsum,"). it is probable, furthermore,
that the accusation of illegitimacy was not originally considered so serious;
it was ascribed to the most prominent personages, and is a standing motive
in folk-lore (Krause, "Leben Jesu,").
The incident of Jesus concerning
the dispute with the Scribes was copied by the rabbinical sources (Kallah
18b). All the "Toledot" editions contain a similar story of a dispute which
Jesus carried on with the Scribes who on the ground of that dispute, declared
him to be a bastard. Analogous to this story are numerous tales of predictions
by precocious boys.
The sojourn of Jesus in Egypt
is an essential part of the story of his youth. According to the Gospels
he was in that country in his early infancy, but Celsus says that he was
in service there and learned magic; hence he was there in early manhood.
R. Joshus b. Perahyah is said to have fled with his pupil Jesus to Alexandria
in order to escape the persecutions of the Jewish king Yannal (103-76 B.C.);
on their return Jesus made a remark on the spot faultless beauty of their
hostess, whereupon R. Joshua excommunicated him: and when Jesus approached
him again and was not received he set up a brick for his god, and led all
Israel into Apostasy (Sanh. 107b; Sotah 47a; Yer. Hag. 77d). This account
is supplemented by the statement, made on the assumption that Ben Stada
is identical with Ben Pandera, that Ben Stada brought magic from Egypt
The story that Joshua b.
Persbyah, a contemporary of Simeon b. Sheta, was the teacher of Jesus,
is not clearly stated in the various "Toledot:' it is said merely that
Jesus was named after this brother of his mother. The assumption that Oshua
b. Perahyah was the uncle of Jesus is confirmed by Kirkisani, who wrote
about 987 a history of Jewish sects...The references to Yannai, Salome
Alexandra, and Joshua b. Perabyah indicate that according to the Jewish
legends the advent of Jesus took place just one century before the actual
historical date; and some medieval apologists for Judaism, as Nahmanides
and Salman Zebi, based on this fact their assertion that the "Yeshu'" mentioned
in the Talmud was not identical with Jesus; this however, is merely a subterfuge.
According to Celsus and to
the Talmud (Sanhedrin 104b), Jesus learned magic in Egypt and performed
his miracles by means of it; the latter work in addition, states that he
cut the magic formulas into his skin. It does not mention, however, the
nature of his magic performances (Tosef. Shab. xi.4; Yer. Shab. 18d); but
as it states that the disciples of Jesus healed the sick "in the name of
Jesus Pandera." (Yer. Shab. 14d; Ab. Zarah 27b; Eccl. R. i.8) it may be
assumed that its author held the miracles of Jesus also to have been miraculous
cures. Different in nature is the witchcraft attributed to Jesus in the
"Toledot." When Jesus was expelled form the circle of scholars, he is said
to have returned secretly from Galilee to Jerusalem, where he inserted
a parchment containing the "declared name of God" ("Shem ha- Meforash"),
which was guarded in the Temple, into his skin, carried it away, and then,
taking it out of his skin, he performed his miracles by its means. This
magic formula then had to be recovered from him, and Judah the Gardener
(a personate of the "Toledot" corresponding to Judas Iscariot) offered
to do it; he and Jesus then engaged in an aerial battle (borrowed from
the legend of Simon Magus), in which Judah remained victor and Jesus fled.
The accusation of magic is
frequently brought against Jesus. Jerome mentions it, quoting the Jews:
"Magum vocant et Judel Dominum Meum"; Marcus, of the sect of the Valentinians,
was, according to Jerome, a native of Egypt, and was accused of being,
like Jesus, a magician. There were even Christian heretics who looked upon
the founder of their religion as a magician, and public opinion at Rome
accused all Christians of magic (W.M. Ramsay, "The Church in the Roman
Empire Before A.D. 170,"). The Apostles were regarded in the same light
("Acts Petri et Andreae,"). Neither this accusation nor that concerning
the birth of Jesus is found in the canonical Gospels, but it occurs in
the apocryphal account...(The Jewish Encyclopedia, pp. 170-171)) and all
these sources tend to belittle Him by ascribing to Him illegitimate birth,
the use of magic and the shameful death of a common criminal. It goes on
to say that His mother, the Virgin Mary, was seduced by a Roman soldier
from the garr ison at Nazareth, named Panthera; and Jesus was the result
of that union.
After referring to a Talmudic
source regarding a dispute between Jesus and the scribes (lawyers), the
Jewish Encyclopedia states: "All the Toledon editions contain a similar
story of a dispute which Jesus carried on with the scribes on the grounds
that they declared Him to be a bastard." (John 8:44) They said, "We be
not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God."
And Jesus rebutted them in
vs. 42-43 by saying: "If God were your Father, ye would love me; for I
proceeded forth and came form God: neither came I of myself but He sent
me. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my
Again, according to the Talmud,
Jesus was supposed to have, as we have shown in a footnote, learned magic
while He was in Egypt and the Jewish leaders accused Him of performing
His miracles by these means and through the power of Satan. It goes on
to say that His disciples healed the sick in the "name of Jesus Pandera."
In Matthew 12:24 we read
where the Pharisees on seeing His miracles said: "...This fellow doth not
cast out devils, but by Beelzebub, the prince of devils." Jesus refuted
their claim, by saying, vs. 26: "If Satan cast out Satan, he is divided
against himself; how then shall his Kingdom stand?" And they could
not answer Him.
Continue on to:- Part 19
Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books
Watch - Willie Martin