Identity -Part 9
After being spurned by the Confederate intelligence community, Mary's
'candy man' approached and became involved with the Rothschild Empire of
Europe, for he realized the European banking moguls would be very interested
in his pipeline to the White House.
(At this time) Abraham was searching for an issue that would unite the
North and South AFTER the Civil War ended. The issue needed to be popular
to all levels of American citizenry so they could 'rally around the Stars
and Stripes' thus rapidly healing the wounds of the bloodiest war in history.
Lincoln was seriously considering one major movement or event that would
galvanize his fellow Northern and Southern patriot countrymen into cutting
loose the United States of America from the dictatorial grip of the Hapsbergs
bloodline of banking control in Europe. All the time, the Rothschilds were
trying to take control of the entire world monetary system, and at that
time the Rothschilds were trying to get a foot-hold in America and find
a way around the British, Virginia Company, and French Bourbon family that
were gaining control in this country through government help...
Lincoln found himself in real hot water, because under the Virginia
Company covenant the 48 families that formed it were all of the Holy Grail
Bloodline. This country was to be an extension of what all the royal families
of Europe controlled. The royalty of Europe is Hapsburg, no matter what
their name is. The royal family of England is one such example. Now what
Lincoln did is he wanted to become independent of the cogenant (in favor
of his family) on the Rothschild side...the Rothschilds and their family
bloodline have always been undermining the affairs of the Hapsbergs and
stealing the monetary control away from them. No matter what the history
books say, the Rothschilds didn't get (total) real control on things in
America and the Federal Reserve until the Springs usurped the Payseur family
companies in the early 1920s...
(But Lincoln had fallen from Rothschild grace also and so, due, in part
to his Executive Order to print United States Greenbacks, thus interfering
with the Jewish International Banks profits) It appears that the Rothschild
family wanted Lincoln embarrassed to the maximum degree. (So) Mary Todd's
drug dealer (John Wilks Booth) was hired to kidnap the President of the
United States. Abraham would be put on a boat for a two month cruise of
the Atlantic where he would be injected with and addicted to opium and
then dumped on the streets of Washington. While the forcefully addicted
President was stumbling around our nation's capital, the press would be
informed of Elizabeth, Ella and Emily.
The drug pusher (Booth) and collaborator (agent) of the Rothschilds
had his perfect accomplice in the plot to kidnap and discredit the leader
of the North American continent in the First Lady Mary Todd Lincoln. After
being informed of Abe's lover and the twins and the kidnap plot by her
drug supplier, Mary was promised that after her husband resigned or was
impeached, she and Abe would be moved to Europe to live happily ever after
with plenty of opium. Superficially Mary expressed a desire to live in
Europe with plenty of opium and no Civil War or politics to distract her
husband or family. But her drug suppler had totally underestimated the
confusion, desperation and anger of Mary Todd Lincoln.
The plotters decided the Presidential snatch needed to take place in
a public, yet discreet location where minimum witnesses would be present.
There were too many potential witnesses at the White House. Two hours before
the capture was to take place, Mary Todd had on the floor, a tantrum, because
Abe had decided not to go out of the White House that night. Mary's outrageous
outburst caused Abe to change his mind and the First family departed. Several
minutes after arriving at the kidnap location, Mary instructed the family
bodyguard to take a position that placed the First Family out of his visual
sight. The position also required the bodyguard to traverse several flights
of stairs to reach Abe and Mary should he be needed for any reason...A
wagon with a wooden cover arrived at the back entrance of the kidnap location
with several men including Mary's opium supplier. The plan was for the
drug pusher to traverse the backstairs entrance, silently move down a hallway,
and open an unlocked door to a darkened room where Mary and Abe were sitting.
After entering the room, Mary's drug man (Booth) would tell the President
an urgent message was waiting for him at the War Department. Before descending
down the backstairs, Abe would be knocked out with a chloroform loth. The
kidnappers would load the limp body into the covered wagon and swiftly
stow Lincoln on an opium boat for a novel 'cruise' of the Atlantic Ocean.
When Booth actually opened the door to the darkened room where Abe and
Mary were sitting, he went into a panic and shock. Abe was asleep with
his head on Mary's left shoulder and the First Lady had her head turned
toward the left looking at the door...When she was sure the man who opened
the door was Booth, she turned and looked at the President to be sure the
pistol she was pointing would explode beneath the lower left earlobe of
Before Mary pulled the trigger, John Wilkes Booth, drug supplier to
the First Lady, realized he was the patsy in all this mess. But he did
not know if he was only Mary's patsy or also a chump for the Rothschild
family. Were the men hiding around the back door of Ford's Theater there
to help Booth with the kidnaping or there to point the false finger at
the 'innocent' Booth? Booth was not about to run into the hallway or down
the backstairs to find out the answer to that question. The only escape
route was to jump the balcony and crash onto the stage during the performance.
That night, Booth gave a literal interpretation of the theatrical phrase
'brake a leg' as he fractured one of his during his leaping act from 'lethally
looney Mary' and the men lurking around the back entrance of Ford's Theater.
In a novelty case on a wall in Ford's Theater is 'The Gun That Shot
Abraham Lincoln.' If anyone (assassin) were to kill a head of state, they
would use a revolver, because several bullets might be needed to accomplish
the murder and stop any guards during the escape. One would only use a
one-shot pistol if they were absolutely sure they had intimate access to
the victim. The gun on the wall of Ford's Theater is a derringer-the perfect
weapon for the left handed female assassin who did not attend her husbands
funeral. Mary Todd was not hiding in her room due to overwhelming grief
and sorrow; she was imprisoned in her room with two armed guards for two
weeks after killing her husband.
In the 1860s, an act of Congress mandated the compensation of widows
of former and active Congressmen, Senators, Vice Presidents and Presidents.
The mouth and duration was ratified by both Houses of Congress for each
widow. Mary Todd Lincoln applied for her widowers compensation three times
and was denied the mandated compensation three times by both Houses of
Congress. An unknown benefactor paid for Mary's passage to Europe where
she died in small cottage in Germany.
In 1867, the Secret Service was founded so that drunken municipal law
enforcement could not unwittingly participate with drug-addicted First
Ladies or Gentlemen in vengeful high-brow killings of philandering Presidents
of the United States. (To cover up the murders committed which would reflect
a bad light for the presiding Administration, such as the Foster murder
is doing at the present time).
Before Booth jumped out of the balcony of the Presidential Box of the
Ford Theater, he shouted at General Riley and his wife who were sitting
to the right-front of the Lincolns. Booth's words expressed his innocence
but also sealed the fate of the Rileys. Within a week of the shooting,
General Riley and his wife were packed off to an insane asylum where they
both died of 'unknown causes' within 30 days of being committed." (Pandora's
Box, by Alex Christopher, pp. 282-286))
The persecution and destruction of White Christian people by the Jews
is not a recent thing but reaches far back into history. Writing in the
April, 1921 issue of the "Hebrew Christian Alliance Quarterly," the Rev.
M. Malbert stated: "I am going to show that real religious persecution
is uniquely Jewish...In the time of Justinian, in the sixth century, the
Jews massacred Christians in Caesarea and destroyed their churches. When
Stephanus, the governor, attempted to defend the Christians, the Jews fell
on him and slew him. In 608 A.D. the Jews of Antioch fell upon their Christian
neighbors and killed them with fire and sword...About 614 A.D. the Persians
advanced upon Palestine and the Jews, after joining their standard, massacred
the Christians and destroyed their churches. Ninety thousand Christians
perished in Jerusalem alone." (The International Jew, Vol. IV (1922), pp.
Perhaps the greatest act of revenge, treachery and hatred perpetrated
by the Jews was their destruction and takeover of the white-ruled and Christian
Nation of Russia. Here we have a premeditated and cold-blooded plan to
destroy the White Government and People of this nation.
The prophet Ezekiel also identifies the Idumeans as those claiming the
land of Israel. We read: "Therefore thus saith the Lord God: Surely in
the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen,
and against all Idumea, which have appointed my land into their possession,
with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out
for a prey." (Ezekiel 36:5)
Yes, the Idumeans (which is another name for the Edomites (Edom is in
"Modern Jewry," Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, p. 41)) had
appointed Israel's land as their own possession. The descendants of these
Edomite-Canaanites have laid claim to the land ever since Israel was first
In fact, the Canaanite was in the land from the beginning, since the
days of Abraham. The declaration of 1948 was only a continuation of an
age old attempt to steal the heritage of Israel and lay claim to their
land. But, rest assured, the prophets have foretold it all. The clearest
indictment of these heathen impostors comes from those scriptures that
speak of the time when Israel would be restored to their land and reclaim
The prophets give us clear indication that the Israelites would repossess
their land from an heathen people, which would be called by God's name!
Yes, these people would call themselves Israel. This passage from the prophet
Amos addresses the reestablishment of the Davidic monarchy and the people's
repossession of the land. We read: "In that day I will raise up the tabernacle
of David that is fallen, and close up the breaches thereof; and I will
raise up his ruins, and I will build it as in the days of old: That they
may possess the remnant of Edom, and of all the heathen which are called
by my name, saith the Lord that doeth this...And I will plant them upon
their land, and they shall no more be pulled up out of their land." (Amos
This is a clear reference to the fact that the remnant of Edom would
be in the land and that they would be called by God's name, that is Israel!
Moreover, the True Israelites would repossess the land from these heathen
The other prophets confirm the identity of those from whom Israel would
repossess the land. In Obadiah we read: "The house of Jacob shall possess
their possession. And the house of Jacob shall be a fire, and the house
of Joseph a flame, and the house of Esau for stubble, and they shall kindle
in them, and devour them; and there shall not be any remaining of the house
of Esau...And the captivity of this host of the children of Israel shall
possess that of the Canaanites, even unto Zarephath." (Obadiah 17-20)
Again, we have reference to the Edomites and the Canaanites. The scriptures
clearly tell us these heathen peoples would be in the land when Israel
returned to possess it. This prophecy from Zechariah also confirms the
presence the Canaanite in the land. We read: "In that day shall there be
upon the bells of the horses, holiness unto the Lord; and the pots of the
Lord's house shall be like the bows before the altar. Yea, every pot in
Jerusalem and in Judah shall be holiness unto the Lord of hosts: and all
they that sacrifice shall come and take of them, and seethe therein: and
in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the Lord
of hosts." (Zechariah 14:21)
Yes, in that day there shall be no more the Canaanite in Jerusalem,
nor in all the land. These heathen impostors who now call themselves Israel
will be cast out for evermore, never again to return and lay claim to the
heritage of Israel. Truly, they are the heathen called by God's name, as
foretold by the prophet Amos. (Amos 9:12)
There is written in the prophets a number of passages foretelling that
a heathen people would lay claim to the land and inheritance of Israel
during the time of their dispersion among the nations. The scriptures identify
these impostors specifically as descendants of the Edomite-Canaanite families.
These heathen people would even claim to be Israel. (Revelation 2:9; 3:9)
The prophets say they would called by God's name, indicating they would
be called Israel. Only with an historic understanding of that idiom can
it be known that a heathen people would assume Israel's heritage and claim
that name once given to Jacob.
Looking at world events today, we have confirmation of all that has
been written. Surely the words of the prophets have come to pass as there
is in the land today another people called by My name. It is a battle between
Christianity and Judeo- Christianity. It has only been in recent times
that after the people we know, today, as Jews, became familiar with Christian
literature, they began to name their religion Judaism.
Rabbi Stephen Wise, one of the main Jewish leaders in the United States
a few years ago, stated that when the Jews returned to Jerusalem from Babylon
(with the True Israelites), about 536 B.C., they brought with them the
teachings which became known as the Babylonian Talmud. "This was the end
of Hebrewism, and the beginning of Judaism," the learned Rabbi stated.
As Christians it has become of vital interest that we know what kind
of a religion Judaism actually is. We know it has been accepted by most
of the evangelical and fundamental Christians as the religion of Ancient
Israel and the Bible. But is it really the religion of the Biblical prophets
who over and over again foretold that Jesus and His disciples practiced
when He was in His earthly body on this earth? It is the religion we read
about in the pages of the Old Testament?
Or is it a cleverly conceived, Satanic religion which is so clever,
that in the words of Jesus: "...if it were possible, they would deceive
the very elect." These "elect" are not Jews, since the Jews are never referred
to in the pages of the Holy Writ as "the elect." This term is used on in
connection with "True Israel."
It would be difficult to get a better answer for this thorny question,
than by going directly to Jewish sources. Rabbi Bakker writes: "This is
not an uncommon impression and one find it sometimes among the Jews as
well as Christians, that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It
is of course a fallacious impression."
Judeo-Christian Heritage A Hoax: It appears
there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian
heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians.
That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well
stated in the author-initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966,
by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy,
at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the
purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless.
Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity; and Christianity is
Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as
the Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian or Secularist
We need to note here, that the Babylonian Talmud is the textbook of
modern Rabbinism and is the "hearts blood" of the Jewish religion. According
to their own leaders, it supersedes any other religious writing.
Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, one of the leading authorities on Judaism asserted:
"Phariseeism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and
Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes
of name...The spirit of the ancient pharisee survives unaltered."
We would also remind you that it was to these Pharisees Jesus Christ,
the Son of God, directed His sternest denunciations. In John 10:26, speaking
directly to these religious frauds of His day, He said: "But ye (Pharisees)
believe not, because ye are not of my sheep..." That should be clear to
anyone who is a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ; that the Jews are not
In a serially produced installment of a best-seller by Jewish author
Herman Wouk, we find the heading "The Talmudic Heart's Blood of the Jewish
Faith." He says: "The Talmud is to this day the circulating heart's blood
of the Jewish religion. Whatever laws, customs, or ceremonies we observe,
whether we are Orthodox, Conservative, Reformed or merely spasmodic sentimentalists,
we follow the Talmud. It is our Common Law!"
The beginning of Talmudic literature dates back to the time of the Babylonian
exile in the 6th Century B.C...a thousand years later, in Alexandria, Egypt,
these traditions of men were finally set down in codified form. When all
the frills and mystery is removed from the Talmud, it boils down to the
"traditions of the elders," which Jesus so venomously denounced in His
ministry. (Matthew 15:3,6,9; Mark 7:6-19,13)
In Matthew 15:2, we listen as Christ asks the scribes (lawyers) and
the Pharisees: "Why do ye also transgress the commandment of God by your
In verse 9 He enlarged on this evil by saying: "But in vain do they
(scribes and Pharisees) worship me (God), teaching for doctrines the commandments
A full and complete story about these scribes and Pharisees is related
in the chapter 29 of the Book of Isaiah. "Woe to Ariel, (#740 Strong's
Concordance - name for Jerusalem) to Ariel, the city where David dwelt!
add ye year to year; let them kill sacrifices. Yet I will distress Ariel,
and there shall be heaviness and sorrow: and it shall be unto me as Ariel.
And I will camp against thee round about, and will lay siege against thee
with a mount, and I will raise forts against thee. And thou shalt be brought
down, and shalt speak out of the ground, and thy speech shall be low out
of the dust. Moreover the multitude of thy strangers shall be like small
dust, and the multitude of the terrible ones shall be as chaff that passeth
away: yea, it shall be at an instant suddenly. Thou shalt be visited of
the Lord of hosts with thunder, and with earthquake, and great noise, with
storm and tempest, and the flame of devouring fire. And the multitude of
all the nations that fight against Ariel, even all that fight against her
and her monition , and that distress her, shall be as a dream of a night
vision. It shall be as when an hungry man dreameth, and behold, he eateth;
but he awaketh, and his soul is empty; or as when a thirsty man dreameth,
and, behold, he drinketh; but he awaketh, and behold, he is faint, and
his soul hath appetite: so shall the multitude of all the nations be that
fight against mount Zion. Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and
cry: they are drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong
drink. For the Lord hath poured out upon you (scribes, Pharisees - Jews)
the spirit of deep sleep, and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your
rulers the seers hath he covered. And the vision of all is become unto
you as the words of a book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that
is learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for
it is sealed: And the book is delivered to him that is not learned and
saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned. Wherefore
the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people (scribes, Pharisees - Jews) draw
near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honor me, but have removed
their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept
of men (Traditions of Men - The Talmud): Therefore, behold, I will proceed
to do a marvelous work among this people, even a marvelous work and a wonder:
for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of
their prudent men shall be hid. Woe unto them that seek deep to hide their
counsel from the Lord, and their works are in the dark, and they say, Who
seeth us? and who knoweth us? Surely your turning of things upside down
shall be esteemed as the potter's clay: for shall the work say of him that
made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of him that framed
it, He had no understanding?" (Isaiah 29:1-16)
Identity - Part 10
In Mark 7:7 we find this same accusation followed by another in verse
9: "...Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your
And in verse 13, He said that these religious and political leaders,
"Made the word of God of none effect through their tradition."
The Talmud, did not appear in writing form until centuries after the
Christian world came into existence. The Talmud comes from Mishaic Hebrew
and means "learning, teaching, instruction."
It was at first passed on by word of mouth. By the time it appeared
in written form about 500 A.D. it contained much which was viciously anti-Christ
and anti-Christian. This has resulted in what today is known erroneously
as "anti-Semitism." We say "erroneous," since the vast majority of those
people who call themselves Jews, are of Turco-Mongolian (Khazars), rather
than Semitic in origin.
Nothing is more thrilling to a genuine Christian than to hear the name
of Jesus Christ uplifted and exalted and to listen to the marvelous promises
made by their King to those who will remain faithful to Him. So, when they
hear His wonderful name blasphemed, degraded and associated with filth,
their reaction is anger against those who promote such beliefs. Doesn't
it seem strange that only one religion in the world attacks the teachings
and person of Jesus Christ?
The Mohammedans honor Him as a great prophet and other religions recognize
Him as a great spiritual leader; only in Judaism is Jesus, the Son of God,
degraded and called the "son of a whore." The Talmud tale is told that,
because of talking to a Christian Disciple of Jesus, a rabbi is suspected
of being pro-Christian, which makes him deeply ashamed. He tells the lie
that Jesus taught that the hire of a harlot may be used to build a privy
for the high priest. (Abodah Zarah 16b-17a)
This last pleased the rabbi very much. This filthy and false story to
defame Christ is used in a typical Pharisee lie by Rabbi Louis Finklestein
in his publication "The Pharisees." (See pages xv-xvi of the Foreword)
Rodkinson (M. Levi Frumkin), who made the first English translation of
the Babylonian Talmud, asks, in the section on the History of the Talmud:
"Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet
in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it?...To such
inquiries the learned class of Jewish rabbis answer by holding up the Talmud...The
Talmud then, is the written form of that which, in the time of Jesus, was
called the Traditions of the Elders, and to which he makes frequent allusions."
The Talmud and Mary, Mother of Jesus, she is called; "Miriam, a dresser
of women's hair." She "committed adultery." ; (Sanhedrin 69a) "She played
the harlot with carpenters." (Sanhedrin 106a-106b)
All the rabbinical sources ascribe to Jesus, "illegitimate birth...the
seducer was a soldier by the name of Panthera [also called Pandira, and
stada]."; "Pappus [husband of Mary] has nothing to do with the story of
Jesus, and was only connected with it because his wife happened to be called
'Miriam' [Mary] and was known to be an adulteress."
All the life of Jesus (Toledot Yeshu), "editions contain a similar story
of a dispute which Jesus carried on with the scribes who on the ground
of that dispute declared him to be a bastard." (Jewish Encyclopedia, "Jesus.")
Christ is referred to as "Balaam" in the most lewd Talmud passages concerning
Him. Proof that Jesus is called "Balaam" is found in the Jewish Encyclopedia
(under "Balaam") which, after enumerating His alleged loathsome qualities,
states: "Hence...the pseudonym 'Balaam' given to Jesus in Sanhedrin 106a
and Gittin 57a."
In the same article, we are told that the Talmud likens the Gospel Christians
and Christ to Baal sex-worshipers because of whose abominations 24,000
Israelites died of plague at the time of Balaam. (Numbers 25:1-9) Because
Balaam had been asked to curse the Israelites but instead did not foretold
the coming Messiah, (Numbers 24:17) the flimsy pretext is made that Jesus
was a curse like Balaam. "He (Christ) is pictured as blind in one eye and
lame in one foot and his disciples distinguished by three morally corrupt
He is called "one that ruined a people," and His churches are likened
to nudist Baal worship.
And, "this hostility against his memory finds it climax in the dictum
that whenever one discovers a feature of wickedness or disgrace in his
life, one should preach about it." (Sanhedrin 106b)
Jesus, as stated in both the Talmud and Jewish Encyclopedia, gets "four
legal methods of execution" and is Crucified as well, as a blasphemer of
Jesus stoned, then "hanged" or crucified, (Sanhedrin 43a-45b; 67a);
where under another phony name (Ben Stada). (Jewish Encyclopedia) Jesus
crucified as a "blasphemer," (Sanhedrin 46a; Jewish Encyclopedia) Jesus
burned (Sanhedrin 52a); manner of burning, (Yebamoth 6b) verified by Jewish
Encyclopedia under "Balaam." He (Christ) is; "lowered into dung up to his
armpits then a hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his
neck and the two loose ends pulled in opposite directions forcing him to
open his mouth. A wick was then lit, and thrown into his mouth so that
it descended into his body and burnt his bowels...his mouth was forced
open with pincers against his wishes." (Sanhedrin 52a)
And: "The death penalty of 'burning' was executed by pouring molten
lead through the condemned man's mouth into his body, burning his internal
organs." (Yebamoth 12b)
Jesus strangled: "He was lowered into dung up to his armpits then a
hard cloth was placed within a soft one, wound round his neck, and the
two ends pulled in opposite directions until he was dead." (Sanhedrin 52a;
106a. Jewish Encyclopedia)
Jesus in hell where His punishment is "boiling in hot semen." (Gittin
57a) The subject is identified as Jesus in a footnote, also in the Jewish
Encyclopedia under "Balaam." Jesus "committed bestiality," "corrupted the
people," is "turned into hell." (Sanhedrin 105a) Jesus "limped on one foot'
and 'was blind in one eye.'" "he practiced enchantment by means of his
membrum," "he committed bestiality with his ass," he was a fool who "did
not even know his beats's mind." (Sanhedrin 105a-105b)
The ridiculous and foul misuse of Judges 5:27 about Sisera's dying convulsions
meaning sexual intercourse is here applied to Jesus, with a footnote "explanation"
of Judges 5:27: "This is taken to mean sexual intercourse..."
Jesus attempts to seduce women, is excommunicated by a rabbi and then
worships a brick, was a seducer of Israel, and practiced magic. (Sanhedrin
107b; Jewish Encyclopedia) Jesus is cited in the index of the Sanhedrin
portion of the Talmud, "chief repository of the criminal law of the Talmud,"
which shows the page numbers where he is denounced.
Jesus' resurrection is cured: "Woe unto him who maketh himself alive
by the name of God." (Sanhedrin 106a)
The trial of Jesus: "It was the action of the priests that Jesus was
sent before Pontius Pilate."
The Sanhedrin priests; "had the most reason to be offended with Jesus'
action in cleansing the Temple," the probable place of His trial, according
to the Talmud. His cry: "My god, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?...was
in all its implications itself a disproof of the exaggerated claims made
for him. The very form of his punishment would disprove these claims in
Jewish eyes. No Messiah that Jews could recognize could suffer such a death;
for 'He that is hanged is accursed of God.' (Deuteronomy 21:23) This refers
to an 'evil son' and Talmudist Rashi adds 'an insult to God.'" (Jewish
Encyclopedia under "Jesus.") Other foul charges against Jesus and His mother,
His being a "bastard," and the like, follow.
Of course the Talmud does not mention Jesus by name, but the footnotes
and context clearly show He is the one they are referring to. The Jewish
Encyclopedia states that Jewish legends regarding Jesus are found in three
sources (In Jewish Legend: The Jewish legends in regard to Jesus are found
in three sources, each independent of the others (1) New Testament apocrypha
and Christian polemical works, (2) in the Talmud and the Midrash, and (3)
in the life of Jesus ("Toledot Yeshu'") that originated in the Middle Ages.
It is the tendency of all these sources to belittle the person of Jesus
by ascribing in him illegitimate birth, magic, and a shameful death. In
view of their general character they are called indiscriminately legends.
Some of the statements, as that referring to magic, are found among pagan
writers and Christian heretics: and as the Ebolonites, or Judeo-Christians
who for a long time lived together with the Jews, are also classed as heretics,
conclusions may be drawn from this as to the origin of these legends.
It ought also to be added that many of the legends have a theological
background. For polemical purposes, it was necessary for the Jews to insists
on the illegitimacy of Jesus as against the David descent claimed by the
Christian church. Magic may have been ascribed him over against the miracles
recorded in the Gospels; and the degrading fate both on earth and hereafter
of which the legends speak may be simply directed against the ideas of
the assumption and the resurrection of Jesus. The Jewish legends relating
to Jesus appear less inimical in character when compared with the parallel
passages which more especially as such legends are fixed and frequently
occurring themes of folk-lore; and imaginations must have been especially
excited by the historical importance which the figure of Jesus came to
have for the Jews.
The earliest authenticated passage ascribing illegitimate birth to Jesus
as that in Yeb. iv.8. The mysterious phrase ("that man") cited in this
passage as occurring in a family register which R. Simeon ben Azza is said
to have found seems to indicate that it refers to Jesus, and here occur
also the two expressions so often applied to Jesus in later literature
("that anonymous one," the name of Jesus being avoided") and (-"bastard":
for which in later times was used). Such a family register may have been
preserved at Jerusalem in the Judeo-Christian community.
The Jews, who are represented as inimical to Jesus in the canonical
Gospels also, took him to be legitimate and born in an entirely pastoral
manner. A contrary statement as to their attitude is expressed for the
first time in the "Acts of Pilate" ("Gospel of Nicodemus,") Celaus makes
the same statement in another passage, where he refers to a written source,
adding that the seducer was a soldier by the name of Panthera. The name
"Panthera" occurs here for the first time; two centuries later it occurs
in Epiphanius, who ascribes the surname "Panther" to Jacob, an ancestor
of Jesus; and John of Damascus...includes the names "Panther" and "Barpanther"
in the genealogy of Mary. It is certain, in any case, that the rabbinical
sources also regard Jesus as the "son of Pandera." Although it is noteworthy
that he is called also "Ben Stada."
It appears from this passage that, aside from Pandera and Stada, the
couple Pappus b. Judah and Miriam the hairdresser were taken to be the
parents of Jesus. Pappus has nothing to do with the story of Jesus, and
was only connected with it because his wife happened to be cited "Miriam"
(="Mary"), and was known to be an adulteress.
The one statement in which all these confused legends agree is that
relating to the birth of Jesus. Although this is ascribed only to the Jews,
even in Celsus, the Jews need not necessarily be regarded as its authors,
for it is possible that it originated among heretics inimical to Jesus,
as the Ophites and Cainites, of whom Origen says "they uttered such hateful
accusations against Jesus as Celsus himself did" ("Contra Celsum,"). it
is probable, furthermore, that the accusation of illegitimacy was not originally
considered so serious; it was ascribed to the most prominent personages,
and is a standing motive in folk-lore (Krause, "Leben Jesu,").
The incident of Jesus concerning the dispute with the Scribes was copied
by the rabbinical sources (Kallah 18b). All the "Toledot" editions contain
a similar story of a dispute which Jesus carried on with the Scribes who
on the ground of that dispute, declared him to be a bastard. Analogous
to this story are numerous tales of predictions by precocious boys.
The sojourn of Jesus in Egypt is an essential part of the story of his
youth. According to the Gospels he was in that country in his early infancy,
but Celsus says that he was in service there and learned magic; hence he
was there in early manhood. R. Joshus b. Perahyah is said to have fled
with his pupil Jesus to Alexandria in order to escape the persecutions
of the Jewish king Yannal (103-76 B.C.); on their return Jesus made a remark
on the spot faultless beauty of their hostess, whereupon R. Joshua excommunicated
him: and when Jesus approached him again and was not received he set up
a brick for his god, and led all Israel into Apostasy (Sanh. 107b; Sotah
47a; Yer. Hag. 77d). This account is supplemented by the statement, made
on the assumption that Ben Stada is identical with Ben Pandera, that Ben
Stada brought magic from Egypt (Sanhadren 104b).
The story that Joshua b. Persbyah, a contemporary of Simeon b. Sheta,
was the teacher of Jesus, is not clearly stated in the various "Toledot:'
it is said merely that Jesus was named after this brother of his mother.
The assumption that Oshua b. Perahyah was the uncle of Jesus is confirmed
by Kirkisani, who wrote about 987 a history of Jewish sects...The references
to Yannai, Salome Alexandra, and Joshua b. Perabyah indicate that according
to the Jewish legends the advent of Jesus took place just one century before
the actual historical date; and some medieval apologists for Judaism, as
Nahmanides and Salman Zebi, based on this fact their assertion that the
"Yeshu'" mentioned in the Talmud was not identical with Jesus; this however,
is merely a subterfuge.
According to Celsus and to the Talmud (Sanhedrin 104b), Jesus learned
magic in Egypt and performed his miracles by means of it; the latter work
in addition, states that he cut the magic formulas into his skin. It does
not mention, however, the nature of his magic performances (Tosef. Shab.
xi.4; Yer. Shab. 18d); but as it states that the disciples of Jesus healed
the sick "in the name of Jesus Pandera." (Yer. Shab. 14d; Ab. Zarah 27b;
Eccl. R. i.8) it may be assumed that its author held the miracles of Jesus
also to have been miraculous cures. Different in nature is the witchcraft
attributed to Jesus in the "Toledot." When Jesus was expelled form the
circle of scholars, he is said to have returned secretly from Galilee to
Jerusalem, where he inserted a parchment containing the "declared name
of God" ("Shem ha-Meforash"), which was guarded in the Temple, into his
skin, carried it away, and then, taking it out of his skin, he performed
his miracles by its means. This magic formula then had to be recovered
from him, and Judah the Gardener (a personate of the "Toledot" corresponding
to Judas Iscariot) offered to do it; he and Jesus then engaged in an aerial
battle (borrowed from the legend of Simon Magus), in which Judah remained
victor and Jesus fled.
The accusation of magic is frequently brought against Jesus. Jerome
mentions it, quoting the Jews: "Magum vocant et Judel Dominum Meum"; Marcus,
of the sect of the Valentinians, was, according to Jerome, a native of
Egypt, and was accused of being, like Jesus, a magician. There were even
Christian heretics who looked upon the founder of their religion as a magician,
and public opinion at Rome accused all Christians of magic (W.M. Ramsay,
"The Church in the Roman Empire Before A.D. 170,"). The Apostles were regarded
in the same light ("Acts Petri et Andreae,"). Neither this accusation nor
that concerning the birth of Jesus is found in the canonical Gospels, but
it occurs in the apocryphal account...(The Jewish Encyclopedia, pp. 170-
171)) and all these sources tend to belittle Him by ascribing to Him illegitimate
birth, the use of magic and the shameful death of a common criminal. It
goes on to say that His mother, the Virgin Mary, was seduced by a Roman
soldier from the garrison at Nazareth, named Panthera; and Jesus was the
result of that union.
After referring to a Talmudic source regarding a dispute between Jesus
and the scribes (lawyers), the Jewish Encyclopedia states: "All the Toledon
editions contain a similar story of a dispute which Jesus carried on with
the scribes on the grounds that they declared Him to be a bastard." (John
8:44) They said, "We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even
And Jesus rebutted them in vs. 42-43 by saying: "If God were your Father,
ye would love me; for I proceeded forth and came form God: neither came
I of myself but He sent me. Why do ye not understand my speech? even because
ye cannot hear my word."
Again, according to the Talmud, Jesus was supposed to have, as we have
shown in a footnote, learned magic while He was in Egypt and the Jewish
leaders accused Him of performing His miracles by these means and through
the power of Satan. It goes on to say that His disciples healed the sick
in the "name of Jesus Pandera."
In Matthew 12:24 we read where the Pharisees on seeing His miracles
said: "...This fellow doth not cast out devils, but by Beelzebub, the prince
Jesus refuted their claim, by saying, vs. 26: "If Satan cast out Satan,
he is divided against himself; how then shall his Kingdom stand?" And they
could not answer Him.
The Talmudic story of the trial, crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus
is completely at odds with the Biblical account. The Jewish account denies
His resurrection, just as Matthew 28:11-15 explains. How when the Jewish
authorities heard about His resurrection, they paid large amounts of bribe
money to the Roman soldiers who had been guarding the grave, and told them
to tell the governor, Pontius Pilate, that while they slept, the disciples
came and stone His body. It is interesting to note that vs. 15 says: "...and
this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day."
The Jewish report stinks to high heaven for the simple reason that the
Romans were very strict about a soldier going to sleep while on guard duty.
The penalty was death. Yet the Jewish leaders were said to have bribed
Pilate to overlook the dereliction of his soldiers. This was extremely
unlikely. Which proves that the guards were the Temple guards of the Jews,
and not the Romans after all.
According to Talmudic teachings, Jesus is now in hell. It says: "...son
of Titus' sister desired to embrace Judaism and called up from hell by
magic, first Titus (a Roman General), then Baalam, and finally Jesus, who
were taken together to be the worse enemies of Judaism." (Titus was the
Roman General who completely destroyed Jerusalem in 70 A.D)
When Jesus was asked; "Who is esteemed in the world?" According to the
Talmud He was supposed to have replied: "'The Jews. Further, their well-being;
do nothing to their detriment; whoever touches them, touches the apple
of God's eye.'"
This is the same story the televangelists like the so-called Baptist
Jack Van Impe, Jerry Falwell, and Pentecostalist Jimmy Swaggart preach.
Why do the well-know televangelists of the fundamental and charismatic
crowds support the State of the Israeli, no matter what they do?
The answer is that they have swallowed Jewish propaganda "hook, line,
and sinker," and do look on the Jews as the "apple of God's eye." Jerry
Falwell has said: "The reason God has been good to America and blessed
her, is because she has been good to the Jews." This is an incredible and
observable lie, for the fact prove differently.
Identity - Part 11
The time of America's greatest debacle in every way, economic, political,
moral, militarily and spiritually, has been since 1948, when we recognized
that "little bastard state in Palestine called the Israeli." It has been
"down-hill" for us ever since. We often wonder if these Judeo-Christian
preaches have ever bothered to read 2 Chronicles 19:2 which states: "...shouldest
thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath
upon thee from before the Lord."
The saddest and most frustrating thing about this whole scenario is
the blind cooperation given to the anti-Christ leaders by millions of Christians.
Many people ask how Identity Christians interpret the existence of a political-religious
state in the Middle East called "Israel." They ask, "Isn't the reality
of that state proof that Biblical predictions are being fulfilled? What
other explanation is there?"
Our answer is: Yes! prophecy is being fulfilled, but not for the reasons
popularly understood by most Christians.
The popular chiliastic (millennial) view is that the Old Testament predicted
that the Jews would be regathered from the four corners of the world and
reclaim Palestine which was promised to them because they are descendants
At a proper moment in history foreknown to God, a peace treaty will
be signed between Israel and the leaders of Gog/Magog, and the latter will
break that treaty in the middle of the so-called seven year tribulation
period. Israel will be attacked and it all leads to Armageddon.
The (sic) "rapture" will occur either at the beginning of that seven
year time or in the middle, depending upon which detail you espouse. After
the "rapture," the Jews will evangelize the world and suffer martyrdom
in the process. But the God of Israel Who made a covenant with Abraham
will destroy her enemies, and the Jews who have been blinded for centuries
about Messiah will embrace Jesus Christ Who returns to establish His earthly
kingdom for a thousand years, furnishing the leadership that the Jews expected
from Messiah back in Roman times.
The existence of "Israel" today is fulfillment of prophecy - the prophecy
which identifies Jerusalem (Revelation 11:8-9) as that "great city" symbolically
called Babylon the Great in the "Apocalypse of Jesus Christ," the "whore"
of Revelation 17:1 (that great city of Revelation 17:18).
This Jerusalem is the headquarters of the Beast system described in
The Apocalypse. In this view, Jews collectively are not God's Chosen; the
Jews are Khazars not Israelites and their leaders are the prime movers
of the Beast system.
Individual Jews may convert (as many have - but they must renounce Judaism,
which makes them non-Jews if they really convert to Christianity) to Jesus
the Messiah before His return.
As for the alleged seven year long tribulation period, there will be
no such thing. That doctrine is based upon the error of breaking off the
"seventieth week" of the "seventy weeks of years" described in Daniel 9:24-27.
Because the seven year tribulation idea stands or falls on the "seventieth
week of Daniel," and because that is an erroneous premise, it follows that
there will be no seven year tribulation and therefore no pre- or mid-trib
rapture. (Which originally emanated from the dreams of a 15 year old girl,
by the name of Margaret McDonald on her deathbed)
These false ideas are originally from the fertile brains of Jewish teachers
who eventually succeeded in infiltrating the doctrine into a big segment
of the Christian community. They have enjoyed full cooperation (either
wittingly or unwittingly) from non-Jewish and "Jewish Christian" apologists.
For example, "The American Board of Missions to the Jews, Inc., of New
York," published "The Ten Points of Seelisberg," (An issue of The Chosen
People, October 1971, p. 2) a document summarizing an International Conference
of Christians and Jews which met in 1947 at Seelisberg, Switzerland. Those
ten points in effect prevent Christians who abide by them from telling
the whole truth about Judaism. They are as follows:
1). Remember that One God speaks to us all through the
Old and New Testaments.
2). Remember that Jesus was born of a Jewish mother of
the seed of David and the people of Israel, and that his everlasting love
and forgiveness embrace his own people and the whole world.
3). Remember that the first disciples, the apostles, and
the first martyrs were Jews.
4). Remember that the fundamental commandment of
Christianity, to love God and one's neighbor, proclaimed already in the
Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus, is binding upon both Christians and
Jews in all human relationships without any exception.
5). Avoid disparaging biblical or post-biblical Judaism
with the object of extolling Christianity.
6). Avoid using the word Jews in the exclusive sense of
the enemies of Jesus, and the words the enemies of Jesus to designate the
whole Jewish people.
7). Avoid presenting the Passion in such a way as to bring
the odium of the killing of Jesus upon Jews alone. In fact, it was not
all the Jews who demanded the death of Jesus. It is not the Jews alone
who are responsible, for the Cross which saves us all reveals that it is
for the sins of us all that Christ died. Remind all Christian parents and
teachers of the grave responsibility which they assume, particularly when
they present the Passion story in a crude manner. By so doing they run
the risk of implanting an aversion in the conscience or subconscience of
their children or hearers, intentionally or unintentionally. Psychologically
speaking, in the case of simple minds, moved by a passionate love and compassion
for the crucified Savior, the horror which they feel quite naturally towards
the persecutors of Jesus will easily be turned into an undiscriminating
hatred of the Jews of all times, including those of our own day.
8). Avoid referring to the scriptural curses, or the cry
of a raging mob. His blood be upon us and upon our children, without remembering
that this cry should not count against the infinitely more weighty words
of our Lord: Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.
9). Avoid promoting the superstitious notion that the Jewish
people is reprobate, accursed, reserved for a destiny of suffering.
10). Avoid speaking of the Jews as if the first members
of the Church had not been Jews. (Quoted by Peter Schneider, The Dialogue
of Christians and Jews, pp. 71-73)
The Bible does speak about the "apple of God's eye," in Deuteronomy
12:10 and Psalm 17:8, but neither of these Scriptures refer to the Jews,
but to Israel, who is a completely different race of people.
The Talmudic Jew who is dragged out of hell to parrot the Talmudic line
that the Jews are the "apple of God's eye," may be the false Christ worshiped
by the Judeo- Christians, but he is not the Christ of the Bible.
In 1 John 2:18 we read: "Little children, it is the last time; and ye
have heard that Christ shall come, even now there are many antichrists:
whereby ye shall know it is the last time."
Many of these antichrists, false prophets, and false teachers are standing
behind the pulpits of Judeo-Christian churches, leading their Israel people
away from the truth of God's Word. The time has indeed come, when professing
Christian have departed from the faith and are giving heed to "seducing
spirits and doctrines of devils.." (1 Timothy 4:1)
The same Talmudic passage which refers to Jesus being raised from hell
states that His punishment is to be "with boiling hot excrement, since
a master of the Jews has said: 'whoever mocks at the words of the Sages
(Jewish religious leaders) is punished with boiling hot excretement.'"
Anyone with the slightest degree of perception can see how our moral
values have degenerated in the past fifty years. Over a hundred years ago,
a French political philosopher named Alexis de Tocqueville, visited the
United States. He came to find out how we had had such a phenomenal rise
to power in such a short time.
On returning to France, he wrote a letter to an American friend in which
he said, among other things: "America is great because she is good; when
she ceases to be good, she will cease to be great."
We have seen this debacle take place in the past fifty years as moral
and spiritual standards have been destroyed by enemy action; in fact by
many of these churchmen who call God's enemies, His Chosen People.
In this period, we have degenerated from the greatest Republic the world
has ever seen, into a Socialist Democracy which is not tottering on the
verge of totalitarian dictatorship.
The "thought police" of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL) have
conditioned most of our people to accept the "immoral" as "moral," and
"bad" for "good." They have "called evil good, and good evil; have put
darkness for light, and light for darkness; have put bitter for sweet,
and sweet for bitter," just as the prophet Isaiah predicted. (Isaiah 5:20)
He further clarifies these evil men in vs. 23 when he says: "Which justify
the wicked for rewards (bribes), and take away the righteousness of the
righteous from him." This is a perfect example of our present, Jewish controlled
Our morals have been changed as religious leaders, hiding behind the
sanctuary of their pulpits, and in God's name, have cooperated with, and
supported an ancient religion whose corruption came from the occult practices
of ancient Babylon, this was the same religion Jesus Christ fought so vigorously
when He was on this earth and which mysteriously and evil, has become united
with the Christian faith under the name of Judeo-Christianity.
Historically, the Christian faith has had a high regard for women and
little children and has sought to protect them. Jesus warned that anyone
who did anything to harm little children who believed on Him, was in danger
of "extreme, eternal punishment."
In Matthew 18:6, we read where He said: "But those who offend (Greek
- 'skandalizo' meaning: entrap; entice to sin; offend) one of these little
one's which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were
hanged about this neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."
Apparently, according to our Lord, a terrible punishment is reserved for
those who deliberately harm little children.
Yet in our society today, "kiddie pornography" is on the upswing and
"men-boy" clubs have been formed where grown men have sex with under aged
boys. In almost every case, these programs are sponsored and led by Jews,
those people the Judeo- Christian crowd supports. Why?
A look at the Jewish religious book the Talmud, will give you an answer
as to the Jewish proclivity towards "illegal, or unnatural sex."
Listen to the sages of Judaism, as they state in the Talmud: "When a
grown man has had intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for when
the girl is less than three years old, it is as if one puts the finger
into the eye. Tears come to the eye, again and again, so does virginity
come back to the little girl under three years."
Ask yourself why any decent man would want to have sex with a little
girl under the age of three? Yet this is instruction to Jewish men, from
their holy book. It's nothing short of sickness! No other major religion
in the world teaches that women outside of their faith are "like a piece
of raw meat," to be treated as the Jewish man desires. The Talmud abounds
with such sickening references.
In Canada, they are having big problems with the Judeo-Christian concept.
A Kitchner, Ontario welfare worker was reinstated recently, after being
fired for having for lunch sex with a mentally retarded boy who was his
This government worker had twice been convicted of gross indecency under
Canadian Criminal law. His punishment was a one year suspension, but the
Grievance Board, ordered that he be paid retro-active pay for the time
he had missed.
This sort of betrayal of justice and decency is an insult to the people
of Canada, who for the most part are decent, God fearing people. Yet the
same scenario is played over and over again in the United States, with
the same results.
The Tradition of the Elders (Talmud) says this about sex between grown
men and under-aged boys: "Pederasty (sex between men and boys) with a child
below the age of nine years is not deemed as pederasty...if it is committed
with a child of lesser age (than 9 years old), no guilt is incurred."
Another gem of moral turpitude: "It is necessary to teach concerning
one who commits pederasty with a 'terefah,' (a person suffering from an
incurable disease which will end in their death). I think that he is as
one who abuses a dead person, hence exempt from guilt" (This is why our
ancestors, although lost in time and because the Judeo- Christian preachers
stopped preaching about it, used to sit up at night with the dead, because
the Jews would rob them of their gold teeth, or anything else of value
that might have been laid in the casket with the loved one, and to prevent
them from having sex with the dead).
In regards to non-Jews, whom the Christian world often erroneously calls
"Gentiles," the Talmud teaches: "Only Jews are men...Gentiles are not classified
as men, but as barbarians. The Gentile nations have few rights since He
(God) withdrew His shining, legal protection from them, and transferred
their property rights to the Jews."
Non-Jews find themselves in a legal quagmire no-win situation when they
come before a Jewish judge, who is probably backed by a Jewish Prosecuting
Attorney, and very possibly defended by a Jewish court appointed Defense
Counsel. The Talmud says: "If a Gentile (non-Jew) sue a Jew, the verdict
is for the defendant; if a Jew is the plaintiff, he must obtain full damages."
With a high percentage of judges and lawyers being Jews, the non-Jew,
particularly if he is a Christian, has little protection from the law since
the Talmud, which is the legal law for the Jewish judge, states that he
has no property rights and that his possessions are "like unclaimed land
in the desert."
The Talmud teaches that "the Torah (which are supposed to be the laws
of Moses, but when a Jew reads the word 'Torah' he knows that it means
the Talmud, not any books of the Bible, Sanhadrin 59a) outlaw the issue
of Gentiles as that of a beast."
Maybe this explains why the majority of the abortion murder mills in
Canada and the United States are owned and operated by Jewish doctors.
In fact a Jewish Rabbi in the Talmud is quoted as saying: "The best
among the Gentiles deserves to be killed." (Abhodah Zorah, 26b) When an
orthodox Jew prays, he says: "Blessed be Thou (God)... who has not made
me a goi (non-Jewish animal)."
The Talmud infers that Jews are their own Messiah, to be treated like
God and that "He who smites a Jew on the jaw is worthy of death...it is
as though he had assaulted the Divine Presence."
You wonder why Jews are arrogant people? Read their holy book and you
need not wonder why! The Talmud admits that Judaism will only come into
power by inflicting much suffering on the Gentiles and they glory in it.
They are perfectly willing to use the hordes of "brainwashed" Christians
to accomplish their purpose of world control.
One of the ultra-religious sects of Judaism is the Hasidim, who are
devotees of mysticism and the occult. They are followers of the Cabala
(an esoteric secret doctrine known only to an elite few. It is very similar
to the teachings of the higher degrees of Freemasonry, in fact the Freemasons
get much of their symbolism from Judaism).
The Jewish Encyclopedia goes into detail in its explanation of Cabalism,
sometimes called Kabbalism. It includes magic, sorcery, astrology, the
conjuring of demons, transmigration of souls (reincarnation), a non-personal
God, and the use of amulets to ward off evil. ( A fetus (unborn baby skin
- the Jews are doing this today with the skins of many of the aborted babies
- but is unknown to Cabala. Gaster explains why these means were thought
to be effective. It appears that every angel and demon is bound to appear
and obey when he hears a certain name uttered. Even Hai Gaon says, "Amulets
are written, and the divine name is spoken, in order that angels may help."
But a great deal was made to depend upon using the right name at the right
time, a condition likewise frequently insisted on in the Egyptian and Babylonian
"Practical Cabala," or the art of employing the knowledge of the hidden
world in order to attain one's purpose, is founded upon the mysticism developed
in the "Sefer Yezirah" (Book of Creation). According to this work, God
created the world by means of the letters of the alphabet (and numbers)
and particularly those of His name which He combined in the most varied
ways. If one learns these combinations and permutations, and applies them
at the right time and in the right place, one may thus easily make himself
master of creation, since God Himself not only permits but desires this;
for these formulae all proclaim monotheism. The Egyptians held a similar
view. The mystic book "Razel" (eleventh century), in so far as it is to
be considered here, is also of Oriental origin, and reflects similar views.
Instructions are given for the preparation of amulets; and particular days
and hours are indicated as suitable for the manufacture.
In Europe, Spain comes most prominently into view in the consideration
of amulets, that country being a hotbed of superstition (a result of the
teachings of the Catholic Church) and Cabala. Namaides and Adret permit
the employment of a metal plate with the image of a lion as a remedy against
a painful cough. This superstition was a universal one, and is mentioned
also by Manasseh ben Israel of Amsterdam (seventeenth century), who remarks
that Leone Soavio, recommended it to Paracelsus as a cure for stomach pain.
Other amulets were written upon parchment, on the public and is kept carefully
hidden) or of a deer, but wee of avail only when the writer and the chosen
time were propitious...Strangely enough, in the later Middle Ages, Jews
attached to their arms, where the phylacteries were applied, amulets containing
the names of Christ and the three holy kings. Insanity or epilepsy was
cured by hanging beets around the patient's neck. People were warned, however,
that the preparation of these amulets would irritate demons. Against miscarriage
women carried a stone around the neck, called
, a word evidently derived from the French enceinte; a hole was pierced
through it; it was as large and as heavy as a hen's egg. These stones,
which had a glazed appearance, were found in the fields, and were esteemed
of priceless value. A similar purpose was served in antiquity as well as
in the Middle Ages by actites. For lightening labor, Jewish women wore
a piece of a man's vest, girdle, or other clothing. Luther relates that
a Jew presented Duke Albert of Saxony with a button, curiously inscribed,
which would protect against cold steel, stabbing, or shooting. The duke
made the experiment on the Jew, hanging the button around his neck and
then slashing him with a sword. The Italian coin, with its abracadabra-like
inscription, described by GUdemann, was probably of Jewish, and not of
Christian, origin. The medallion bears on the one side the words below,
the Hebrew transliteration of "Majestas YHWH regis domini mei animum benignum
mihi foveat" (May the majesty of YHWH foster a kindly disposition in my
lord the king toward me). Upon the other side is "Majestas YHWH animum
mei regis and me inclinet" (May the majesty of YHWH incline the king's
soul to me).
Identity - Part 12
The expulsion of the Jews from Sapin in 1492 caused the dissemination
of the Cabala far and wise thorough the East and the West. Their unexampled
sufferings served to foster their mystic bent more than ever. The Holy
Land, as far as repeopled by Spanish exiles (notably Safed), became the
hotbed of the most abstruse secret lore, which favored, among other things,
the employment of amulets. From Turkey on the one side and from Italy on
the other, the Cabala spread to Poland and lands adjacent; Hasidism arose
there and flourishes there today. This mysticism also prepared the ground
for amulets, so that there are whole books devoted exclusively to kemi'ot
still extant in manuscript form. This so-called "practical Cabala" recommended
a number of talismans, a description of which must be omitted here in order
to described the celebrated kemi's contest of the middle of the eighteenth
century. Jonathan Eibenschutz, remembered by Jews today as an eminent Talmudist
prepared a number of amulets. He issued them in Metz, where he was rabbi,
and later in Hamburg, Altona, and Wandsbeck, over the united communities
of which he presided as chief rabbi. He made them for sick children, for
expectant mothers, also as remedies against nose-bleed, epilepsy, and the
evil eye. He furnished one that would banish "croaking demons" from a house;
upon digging into the foundations, the demons would then be found in the
shape of veritable croaking frogs. To find the body of one drowned, he
provided a charm in the shape of a written parchment to be laid on the
bank of the river or pond. He claimed to have been particularly successful
with his amulets in helping women in various emergencies; and statistics
were said to support his statements that since he had officiated as rabbi
in Hamburg scarcely one Jewish woman had died in childbirth, while in the
year preceding his arrival "God's wrath had raged widely" in such cases.
The congregational Hebrah Kaddisha (burial society) confirmed this claim
All of this became matter of public discussion when Jacob Emden, then
residing in Altona, and Jacob Joshua Falk, chief rabbi of Frankfort-on-the-Main,
both learned and respected men, openly charged Eibenschutz with invoking
as Savior in his amulets the false Messiah, Shabbethai Zebi. The contest
waged furiously; the scholars and communities of Germany, Holland, Italy,
Turkey, the Holy Land, Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, and elsewhere took active
part in a most vehement discussion. Even the temporal authorities were
appealed to by Eibenschutz's opponents, application being made to the City
Council of Hamburg, and to the king of Denmark. The charge was based particularly
upon five amulets issued by Eibenschutz while officiating in Metz, and
which were certified to by the congregational officials, as having been
written by him.
It is a curious fact that in all the voluminous discussion, the only
point at issue was the employment of the false Messiah's name in these
amulets; not a voice was raised against the folly of amulets in general.
The common impression probably was that they could do no harm and might
serve as spiritual stimulants in the way of the wearer's reassurance and
Many of the Jewish superstitions have found their way into our Judeo-Christian
(Rabbi Moshe Maggal of the National Jewish Information Service said in
1961 when the term Judeo-Christian was relatively new, "There is no such
thing as a Judeo-Christian religion. We consider the two religions so different
that one excludes the other." (National Jewish Information Service, 6412
W. Olympic Blvd. L.A. CA)) society, including much of our teachings on
heaven, hell, Satan, demons, etc. According to the Cabalistic doctrine
"evil is non-existent." The cross of Jesus Christ, which is a symbol of
His sacrificial death to Christians (Galatians 6:14) is an insult to the
god of the Talmud.
During the 500th Anniversary celebration of the birth of Martin Luther,
the Great Reformer in 1983, many Judeo-Christian theologians, including
many from his own Lutheran church, criticized him for his anti-Jewish stance.
Today, in Canada, for instance, Luther would be hauled before a court
for writing his "The Jews and Their Lies." It would be considered as "hate
literature." The same thing will take place in the United States in the
near future, unless Christians wake up to what the Zionists are trying
Martin Luther understood the Jews. He began by supporting them, just
as I did before I had my eyes opened by their anti-God acts. Then from
sad experience he was constrained to write: "...I see in their writings
how they curse us goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers.
They rob us of our money thorough usury...they play us all manner of tricks;
what is worst of all they...teach that such things should be done. No heathen
has done such things and none would do so, except the devil himself, and
those he possesses, like he does the Jews. They openly blaspheme God the
Father, when they blaspheme and curse Jesus...If God would say to us now,
or on the day of judgment: Do you hear, you are a Christian, and know that
the Jews openly blaspheme and curse Me and my Son, and you gave them a
place to do so, also protected and guarded them so they could do so unhindered
and unpunished in your country, city, or houses. Tell me! What shall be
A lot of Judeo-Christians will probably say: "But we thought they were
your people. That's what preachers like Falwell and Swaggart told us. They
said we must support them no matter what they do, because they are your
Chosen People, and if we don't you will curse us!"
And the King will turn to them and say, in His own words: "...I profess
unto them, I never Knew you; depart from me, ye that work iniquity."
I would not wish to be in the shoes of preachers such as Falwell and
a host of others, no matter how popular they may now be on television.
Maybe God will say to these foolish preachers who have benefitted from
their "love affair" with Judaism: "You had my Word. You knew what my Son
said about these anti-Christ's. 'He that despiseth me, hateth my Father
also ...For the Father hath committed all judgment unto the Son: That all
men should honor the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth
not the Son, honoureth not the Father which sent Him..." (See also Luke
10:16; Matthew 10:40; Mark 9:37; John 13:20; 1 Thessalonians 4:8) This
seems pretty clear to me!
Maybe God will say to these men honoring, popularity seeking preachers:
"The prophets warned you...'shouldest thou help the ungodly, and love them
that hate the Lord? therefore is wrath upon thee from before the Lord.'"
(2 Chronicles 19:2)
The Psalmist said: "Do not I hate them, O Lord, that hate Thee? and
am not I grieved wit those who rise up against Thee? I hate them with a
perfect hatred: I count them mine enemies." (Psalm 139:21-22)
Jesus said: "Why call ye me Lord, Lord and do not the things that I
say?" (Luke 6:36)
When our King spoke to the Pharisees, the forerunners of Modern Judaism,
He said: "You generation of vipers (poisonous snakes)! how can ye being
evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth
speaketh." (Matthew 13:34); "But ye (Jews) believe not because ye are not
of my sheep..." (John 10:26); "If ye were Abraham's children, ye would
do the works of Abraham. But now ye (Jews) seek to kill me, a man that
told you the truth: this did not Abraham." (John 8:39-40)
This was followed by Christ's most scathing denunciation of the Jews
when He said: "Ye are of your father the devil, and the deeds of your father
ye will do..." (John 8:44); "If God were your Father ye would love me:
for I proceeded forth, and come from God." (John 8:47)
Then speaking to the churches in the End of the Age, the risen and ascended
Son said: "I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews (Judeans)
and are not, but are of the synagogue of Satan." (Revelation 2:9; 3:9)
These are the people the Judeo-Christian churches defend as God's Chosen,
in spite of all Jesus said about them. The Apostle Paul knew who they were
when he said in 1 Thessalonians 2:15: "Who both killed the Lord Jesus,
and their own prophets, and have persecuted us (Christians); and they please
not God, but are contrary to all men."
In Titus 1:10, Paul warns us against them again: "...many unruly and
vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision (Jews).
Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things
which they ought not, for filthy lucre's (money) sake."
The Jews are not a race, as they are made up of many races, black, Japanese,
Indian, Italian, etc., and have many Gentile converts such as Marilyn Monroe
and Sammy Davis, Jr. The majority of them are not Semites, but come from
a Turco-Mongolian background, as is admitted by many of their own leaders.
Does a person become a member of these so-called "chosen people" by
denying Jesus Christ and accepting the filthy teachings of their Talmud?
How much real Jewish blood is necessary to qualify as a Jew, in the minds
of the "brainwashed" Judeo- Christian?
There are two main branches of modern Jewry. In Western Europe we find
the Sephardic Jews, some of whose ancestors probably fled from Jerusalem
when it was destroyed in 70 A.D.
These spread across North Africa and Spain. They inter-married with
the people of the Mediterranean area, and would include the Edomite Jews
sometimes called Idumeans.
The Ashkenazi Jews, on the other hand, which make up at least 85% of
Jewry, come from the steppes of Russia where their ancestors were known
as Khazars. These people were converted to Judaism in the 8th Century A.D.
Alfred Lilienthal, the renowned Jewish writer says: "Perhaps the most significant
mass conversion to the Jewish faith occurred in Europe in the 8th Century
A.D., and that the story of the Khazars (Turco- Finnish people) is quite
pertinent to the establishment of the modern state of Israeli."
Again he writes: "That the Khazars are the real ancestors of Eastern
European Jewry is a historical fact. Jewish historians and religious textbooks
acknowledge this, though the propagandists of Jewish nationalism (Zionism)
belittle it as pro-Arab propaganda." (Alfred Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection
The Thirteenth Tribe, a book written by the Jewish author Arthur Koestler,
blows the lid from this well-kept secret. He states: "In the 1960s the
number of Sepharidim were about 500,000, while the Ashkenazim of the same
period numbered about 11-million. Thus, in common parlance, Jew is synonymous
with Ashkenazi Jew."
Hence the majority of those we know as Jews, never had ancestors who
set foot in Palestine. It is interesting to note that the same "Ashkenaz"
is found in Genesis 10:3 and 1 Chronicles 1:6, and in both instances is
connected with the sons of Gomer, a nephew of Magog. They are mentioned
as adversaries of "true Israel" in Ezekiel 38, 39. A Westphalian monk named
Christian Druthmar of Acquitanta, wrote somewhere about 864 A.D., that
there "existed in a region where no Christians dwelt, the name of whose
people is Gog and Magog, and who are Huns; among them is one called Gazari
(Khazar) who are circumcised and observe Judaims in its entirety."
When one reads in Revelation about Babylon the Great "drunk with the
blood of the saints," (Revelation 17:5-6) it might be well for us to remember
the 140-million people, including millions of Christians, who have been
slaughtered by Jewish-led and financed communism in the past 100 years,
and who today are persecuting Christians in communist lands.
Amnesty International, recently estimated that as many as 350,000 Christians
each year die under communist persecution. For all intents and purposes,
this means Jewish persecution.
If there is indeed an International Conspiracy between Communism and
Talmudic Judaism, and much evidence points in this direction, then men
like James Keegstra, Malcolm Ross, and Ernst Zundel of Canada, who have
been persecuted by government edict, should be commended as heroes of Christianity.
Instead, on many occasions, they have been reproved by Canadian Christian
prelates. We can turn to Jewish sources to hear what they say about communism.
Oscar Levy, a well-known Jewish author, in the introduction to his book
"The World Significance of the Communist Revolution," said: "We Jews have
erred...we have most grievously erred: and if there was truth in our error
3,000, nay 100 years ago, there is nothing now but falseness and madness,
a madness that will produce an even greater misery and an even wider anarchy.
I confess it to you openly and sincerely, and with a sorrow whose depth
and pain, as the ancient Psalmist and only he could moan into this burning
universe of ours. We who have boasted and posted as the saviors of this
world, we have been nothing but it's seducers, it's destroyers, it's incendiaries,
it's executioners. We who have promised to lead the world into heaven have
only succeeded in leading you into a new hell. There has been no progress,
least of all moral progress. And it is just our (Jewish) morality which
has prohibited all real progress, and, what is worse, which even stands
in the way of all future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world
of ours. I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder
all the more as I know the Spiritual Authors of this Ghastliness."
The Jewish author Samuel Roth, in his book "Jews Must Live," page 12,
says: "The scroll of my life spread before me, and reading it in the glare
of a new, savage light, it became a terrible testimony against my people
(Jews). The hostility of my parents...my father's fraudulent piety and
his impatience with my mother which virtually killed her. The ease with
which my Jewish friends sold me out to my detractors. The Jewish machinations
which three times sent me to prison. The conscienceless lying of that clique
of Jewish journalists who built up libel about my name. The thousand incidents,
too minor to be even mentioned. I had never entrusted a Jew with a secret
which he did not instantly sell cheap to my enemies. What was wrong with
these people who accepted help from me? Was it only an accident, that they
were Jews? Please believe me, I tried to put aside this terrible vision
of mine. But the Jews themselves would not let me. Day by day, with cruel,
merciless claws, they dug into my flesh and tore aside the last veils of
allusion. With subtle scheming and heartless seizing which is the whole
of the Jews fearful leverage of trade, they drove me from law office to
law office, and from court to court, until I found myself in the court
of bankruptcy. It became so that I could not see a Jew approaching me without
my heart rising up within me to mutter. 'There goes another Jew, stalking
his prey!' Disraeli set the Jewish fashion of saying that every country
has the sort of Jews it deserves. It may also be that the Jews have only
the sort of enemies they deserve too."
On page 20 he continues his observation of his own people: "If it is
true, as the Jews claim, that the Gentiles lay violent hands on them purely
out of prejudice against their religion, out of envy for their superior
commercial genius, how would they ever have gotten into that country in
the first place. Read for yourself the story of the progress of Jewry throughout
Europe and America. Wherever they come, they are welcomed, permitted to
settle down, and join in the general business of the community. But one
by one, the industries of the country close to them because of their unfair
business practices, it being impossible to longer hold in check the wrath
of a betrayed people, there is violence, and inevitably, an ignominious
rejection of the whole race from the land! There is not a single instance
where the Jews have not fully deserved the bitter fruit of the fury of
their persecutors...Even in America, the most patient of the Western nations,
things are coming to a head... The civil population is chafing under the
abuses of Jewish doctors and lawyers."
He continues on page 54: "Many articles and books have been written
on the subject of how much the Jews have enriched America culturally. Needless
to add, Jews have authored them. (Or Jewish goyim prostitutes like Jack
Van Impe in his book 'Israel's Final Holocaust,'). And while it is undoubtedly
true that Jews have given themselves over infinitely to the vain show and
inglorious barter which everywhere accompanies the development of the arts
and sciences, I cannot find anything of value they have themselves created
in their over two hundred and fifty years in residence on the American
continent. This is true in science, as well as art...If being in America
meant anything to Jews like Jacques Loeb and Albert Einstein, it certainly
did not crop up in their work."
Roths sums up what we have been trying to say on page 63: "It is my
honest belief that nothing the Jew does in America is essential to its
welfare. On the contrary, a great of what American Jewry does is subversive
of America's best interests... the Jew in America is forever engaged in
the fascinating pursuit of creating everything he needs out of nothing,
his modest opinion of the Gentile world about him... We come to the nations
pretending to escape persecution, and we are the most deadly persecutors
in the wretched annals of man."
Contrast this with what the Judeo-Christian Zionist, Baptist evangelist
Jack Van Impe says on page 50 of his "Israel's Final Holocaust": "We who
live in the memory of the Nazi nightmare, when six million Jews died in
Europe" (according to Jewish sources both before and after the war, there
were never anywhere near six million Jews living in all the territory occupied
by the Nazis and many of these escaped. The six-million myth is being steadily
exploded by truth seeking historians) might conclude that Hitler's hatred
of this people was a phenomenon of the twentieth century. Not so, for Jewish
blood had been spilled across Europe and in other parts of the world for
centuries. In taking the long look at history, one sees that the Jews had
been steadily marching towards Hitler's ovens ever since the fall of their
beloved city in A.D. 70."
Since 1945 there have been many conflicting claims concerning the numbers
of Jewish people (and others) who died at Auschwitz-Birkeneu (Oswiecim,
concentration camp). However, it is only recent research and access to
hitherto unavailable documents, that these numbers have drastically lowered,
possibly indicating that more of our people survive. Perhaps the 6 million
often publicized (though our best figure is 4.3 million) may also need
to be revised lower, we hope so.
Dr. Nathan Nussbaum,
Centre for Jewish Holocaust Studies.
According to official documents in the French Republic (institute for
the Examination of War-criminals) the number that died in Auschwitz was:
According to the French daily newspaper "Le Monde" (20 April, 1978):
According to the memorial plaque on the gas-chamber monument at Auschwitz-Birkenau
(later removed in 1990 by the Polish Government): 4,000,000
According to the "confession" of Rudolf Hoess, the last commandant of
Auschwitz. G.V. interrogation record and written statement before his "suicide":
According to a statement by Yeduha Bauer, Director of the Institute
for Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew University, Jerusalem: 1,600,000
According to "La Monde" (1 September 1989): 1,433,000
According to Prof. Raul Hilberg (Professor for Holocaust Research, and
author of the book, "The Annihilation of European Jewry," 2nd. ed. 1988:
According to Polish historians, G.V. DPA - Report of July 1990 and corresponding
public announcements: 1,100,000
According to Gerald Reitlinger, author of "Die Endlbsun": 850,000
In the autumn of 1989 the Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev opened
Soviet archives, and the public saw for the first time, the complete register
of deaths at Auschwitz - which speaks as a key document of: 74,000 dead
He then goes on to tell how Jews were accepted in Spain where they worked,
studied, and engaged in commerce alongside their neighbors...This era was
relatively calm and is known as "The Golden Age of Spanish Jewry."
He then blames the waves of fanatical Muslims, and Berbers from North
Africa, who disturbed the Jewish life style. Indeed they did, for it was
the Jews, who had been befriended by the Spanish, that turned traitor against
their benefactors and opened the city gates to the Moslem hordes. This
was what caused the intense Spanish persecution of the Jews.