Marks of Israel
Parts 1 through 6
By Willie Martin

Jew Watch

Marks of Israel - Part 1
 
         You have seen many posts from me about True Israel being the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic and kindred people as being the True Tribes of Israel and not the Jews. And because this Jew  Yair Davidy is spreading so much BS on the boards, that you need to know the truth. Just like most of his kind he mixes up a little truth with a lot of false information, to make what he is presenting more acceptable to those who really don't know what to believe.

        Well I have written a book which I call "In Search of Isaac's Children," (Price $39.95, from Willie Martin, P.O. Box 665, Justin, Texas 76247) which I believes proves beyond doubt my belief concerning this matter. However, it is much too long to present in a series, for it is over 300 pages in length. Therefore, I present you with this consolidated study with the help of  Henry D. Houghton, Destiny Publishers, P.O. Box 177, Merrimac, Massachusetts 01860, Price $5.00)

        "Everyone has struggled with the question: Who am I? It has been said that, if we could come up with the answer, ‘everything else would fall in place.'" (Why Civilizations Self-Destruct (1977), Dr. Elmer Pendell, p. 1); "To Destroy a people, you must first sever their roots." (Alexander Solzhenitsyn)

        It is much shorter than mine and is a very good account in a condensed form. So I present it to you for your study and review. Many on my lists who are National Socialists, and those who belong to the NAAWP, have written me and asked me to explain my position for they are interested in how I could propose something such as this, which is against everything they have been taught in the schools and Judeo-Christian churches. You will find that if you are White that more than likely you are a descendant of the Ancient Tribes of Israel; and that the Jews are deceiver, liars, murderers, thieves and are, in fact, the children of the Devil as Christ told us in John 8:44.

        You may be asking yourself about now why should I care about this? You should care if you are a White person because it will show you that you have a tremendous heritage that the Jews are trying desperately to steal from you, and why they are hell bent on destroying the White Race off the earth.

        Also if you and your family were left an inheritance of one million dollars by an unknown relative, would you want to know about it? What if your inheritance were also a royal one, that your ancestors were great and mighty warriors, that you were also heir to a royal throne? Would you want to know this, and claim your rightful inheritance and kingdom? The answer would be "Of Course."

        What would be your reaction if a group of non- relatives, thieves, deceivers, perverts, degenerates, and murderers were conspiring to together to keep you ignorant of your inheritance, so they could steal if for themselves by keeping the original, factual documents hidden from you and the public, by murdering millions of your brothers and sisters, by creating falsified and fraudulent documents which they then deceptively and maliciously put in place of the true documents? How would this make you feel? Would you be upset? Would you want to find the truth...set the record straight for everyone to know...and claim your rightful inheritance?

        This seems like a foolish question. Who in their right mind would not want their inheritance; especially if it were such a noble and worthy inheritance/ Who in their right mind would not want everyone in their family (and the entire world) to know of their noble status, their family prestige; and further, the dastardly, criminal act of those who have been attempting to steal this inheritance for themselves, and keep the knowledge of the truth from everyone? Who in their right mind would not want the record set straight for all to know; and have the criminals swiftly and just fully punished? Well, this is taking for granted that we are all in our right minds; but this is not the topic of our discussion. (Your Inheritance: The Best Kept Secret In The World, Part I: Your Hidden Heritage, p. 3; by Sacred Truth Ministries, P.O. Box 18, Mountain City, Tennessee 37683)

        How strange it is, that with all the definite and positive words in the Word of God as to Israel's continuance forever as a nation, there has never been any long continued and persistent effort on the part of genuine believers in the Bible to find them. That we have been content to let them fade away and vanish into nothingness is surely a deep reproach on all true Christians.

        There is, however, one probable explanation. It was God's Will and purpose to hide them! While the Jews occupied the stage, and even call themselves "Israel," God could work unhindered with an in lost Israel until He had finished His redetermined work; and without them knowing who they were; and only as Israel's time of punishment has run out, and the whole of God's purposes are on the point of complete fulfillment, is the identity of the old nation Israel becoming known, and who are its representatives in this day and in our time.

        Just a few words here for the benefit of those who know nothing of Anglo-Saxon-Israel truth to enable them to understand that which follows.

        The great clue to the understanding of Scripture prophecy is to remember the wide cleavage between the two houses of Israel; their age-long separation, their different careers; their separate destinies; their different prophecies, and their final reunion in the last days.

        In the time of Rehoboam, Solomon's son, God Himself of set purpose and intention divided the Kingdom of Israel into two distinct parts; for when Rehoboam was proposing to go and forcibly bring back the revolting northern house of Israel to himself, God sent Shemaiah the prophet to Rehoboam with this message: "Ye shall not go up, nor fight against your brethren the children of Israel: return every man to his house; for this thing is from me." (1 Kings 12:24)

        How very strange! Why did God do that? Because He had a different work, a different destiny, a different future for the two houses!

        Eventually the ten-tribed house of Israel was taken captive to Assyria in 721 B.C., and HAS NEVER RETURNED TO PALESTINE! Eight years later Sennacherib, King of Assyria, came against all the fenced cities of Judah and took the captives therefrom to Assyria. But the remaining part of the two-tribed house, Judah and Benjamin, were taken captive to Babylon 115 to 135 years later still; SOME of whom returned after 70 years, and were then called "Jews." (This is not exactly true, because there was never any such thing as a Jew until after the letter "J" was invented sometime in the middle of the 1500s. Check any Encyclopedia and you will see that this is correct. But we will use his rendition because it would take too long and too much space to explain who the "Jews" really were. But suffice to know that THEY WERE NOT ISRAELITES - WM) And these are the people whose descendants were in Palestine in the time of our Lord.

                In the days of Christ, Herod, an Edomite, Shelah Jew, was on the throne in Palestine. HE WAS NOT AN ISRAELITE! The Pharisees and Sadducees were in absolute control of the temple and the Sanhedrin. They were not the lawful descendants of the Tribe of Levi. They did not follow the law of Moses, although they claimed to do so.

        Instead they set up their own Babylonian traditions, Traditions of the Elders, later to become known as the Jewish Talmud. Following is how the Pharisees came to be in "Moses' Seat" when Christ was born. They had many enemies at the beginning and the Sadducees were the first of these enemies.

        They were the constant opponents of the Pharisees and their imported Babylonian paganism, misrepresented by the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Pharisees as the Tradition of the Elders, the "Oral Law" ostensibly transmitted privately to Moses and on down, superseding anything written in the Bible. In the six years of civil war between the Pharisees and Alexander Jannaeus, King and High Priest of Jerusalem, 50,000 were killed on both sides before this Sadducean ruler succumbed, and his widow Salome turned affairs over to the Pharisees in 79 B.C.

        Her brother, Simon ben Shetah, had been waiting for such an opportunity. The continued civil war resulted in the sons of Alexander Jannaeus, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, in 63 B.C., going hat in hand to Pompey, Caesar's Roman General in Syria, asking him to invade Palestine and slaughter their respective opponents. This is how Rome happened to be in power when Christ was born. The full story can be found in the Jewish Encyclopedia under "Pharisees."

        But where is Israel? Not a single nation in these days calls itself by that name, except the Khazar Jewish nation known as Israel in the middle east; therefore she must be disguised under another name. Indeed both Isaiah and Hosea say that she shall change her name!

        "For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and THEY (Israel) SHALL NO MORE BE REMEMBERED BY THEIR NAME." (Hosea 2:17); "And thou (Israel) SHALT BE CALLED BY A NEW NAME." (Isaiah 62:2); "For the Lord god shall slay thee and call his servants (Israel) BY ANOTHER NAME." (Isaiah 65:15)

        But where is Israel now? Josephus says that in his day (70 A.D.): "The ENTIRE BODY OF THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL (notice "the entire body," which would include the ten-tribes of Israel and the tribes of Judah and Benjamin - WM) remained in that country (Media); therefore, there are but Two Tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the Ten Tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude and not to be estimated by numbers." (Book II, v. 2)

        James of the Bible is a second witness that the original 12 tribes are scattered abroad and not in Palestine at the time for we find in James 1:1: "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting."

        But what became of them after that? We know they came westward and were lost (Hosea 12:1: "Ephraim feedeth on wind, and followeth after the east wind..."), exactly as Scripture says they should be.

        If it is suggested that possibly the Anglo-Saxons are this Israel, then some people say, "Tell us the exact way our lineage has come down, show us all the way we have come these 2,600 odd years, and will believe."

        That is rather a large order, extending as it does over an immensity of time. We do know, however, that Sharon Turner, the historian, has traced our ancestry back to the very place and the very time in which "Israel" finally disappeared from the sacred pages.

        And Dr. S..., editor of a German publican says: "It will not be surprising to find that England is found to be identified with Israel, and that Germany is a mixture of Philistines, Assyrians, and Romans, traditional enemies of Israel. Hence...the hereditary animosity manifested by the Germans against the Anglo-Saxon races, who in all probability are the genuine descendants from the House of Israel." (I believe I can prove that Germany is the True Tribe of Judah, with other White peoples mixed in, but I shall not go into that now for it would take too much time and space - WM)

        We thank the Doctor and others for their clear testimony, but that is not the evidence on which we rely. We have something infinitely more sure, even the more sure word of prophecy.
 

Marks of Israel - Part 2

        But where is Israel? Not a single nation in these days calls itself by that name, except the Khazar Jewish nation known as Israel in the middle east; therefore she must be disguised under another name. Indeed both Isaiah and Hosea say that she shall change her name!

        "For I will take away the names of Baalim out of her mouth, and THEY (Israel) SHALL NO MORE BE REMEMBERED BY THEIR NAME." (Hosea 2:17); "And thou (Israel) SHALT BE CALLED BY A NEW NAME." (Isaiah 62:2); "For the Lord god shall slay thee and call his servants (Israel) BY ANOTHER NAME." (Isaiah 65:15)

        But where is Israel now? Josephus says that in his day (70 A.D.): "The ENTIRE BODY OF THE PEOPLE OF ISRAEL (notice "the entire body," which would include the ten-tribes of Israel and the tribes of Judah and Benjamin - WM) remained in that country (Media); therefore, there are but Two Tribes in Asia and Europe subject to the Romans, while the Ten Tribes are beyond the Euphrates till now, and are an immense multitude and not to be estimated by numbers." (Book II, v. 2)

        James of the Bible is a second witness that the original 12 tribes are scattered abroad and not in Palestine at the time for we find in James 1:1: "James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes which are scattered abroad, greeting."

        But what became of them after that? We know they came westward and were lost (Hosea 12:1: "Ephraim feedeth on wind, and followeth after the east wind..."), exactly as Scripture says they should be.

        If it is suggested that possibly the Anglo-Saxons are this Israel, then some people say, "Tell us the exact way our lineage has come down, show us all the way we have come these 2,600 odd years, and will believe."

        That is rather a large order, extending as it does over an immensity of time. We do know, however, that Sharon Turner, the historian, has traced our ancestry back to the very place and the very time in which "Israel" finally disappeared from the sacred pages.

        And Dr. S..., editor of a German publican says: "It will not be surprising to find that England is found to be identified with Israel, and that Germany is a mixture of Philistines, Assyrians, and Romans, traditional enemies of Israel. Hence...the hereditary animosity manifested by the Germans against the Anglo-Saxon races, who in all probability are the genuine descendants from the House of Israel." (I believe I can prove that Germany is the True Tribe of Judah, with other White peoples mixed in, but I shall not go into that now for it would take too much time and space - WM)

        We thank the Doctor and others for their clear testimony, but that is not the evidence on which we rely. We have something infinitely more sure, even the more sure word of prophecy.

        Christ Our Lord and His Marks!: We have excellent authority for claiming that Israel must be known and recognized by the marks that are upon her, rather than by the revealing of her lost pedigree.

        Christ did not, in His own case, appeal to the test of pedigree. Let us see how this was so. When John the Baptist was in prison, he desired to know if this marvelous person that was going about was the Messiah. So he sent his disciples to the Lord to inquire who He was; and they cam, asking: "Art thou He that should come, or do we look for another."

        Now here was an excellent opportunity for Christ to declare His lineage and pedigree. He might have said, "God tell John that I am of the tribe of Judah and of the house of David."

        But He did not do anything of the kind, He gave John more definite things on which to build his faith. John was familiar with the prophets, and knew well the marks of the Messiah. And so Christ bade them go and tell John the marks which they saw in Himself; the actual and literal marks as foretold of the Messiah: "Go and shew John those things which ye do hear and see: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them." (Matthew 11:5; Luke 7:3)

        These were the signs and proofs of the Messiah more than a recital of His pedigree. The marks, the prophetic marks were upon Him: they defined and declared the Messiah!

        Tried by this standard (and it must be a true one, for Christ used it), we are perfectly justified in saying that if we, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic people, have the actual and literal marks, the prophetic marks of Israel; especially if no other nation has them, then surely we must be that very Israel. And if the tracing of the pedigree is necessary, then God, in His own good time, will make that plain.

        In the meantime, the great question is "Have we the marks? And all the marks?" and, "Are they on us only?" If so, then the tracing of the pedigree can safely be left.

        Take another instance. Our blessed Lord upon one occasion visited His own city Nazareth; and entering into the synagogue He stood up to read, and the Book says: "And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias...he found the place where it was written, the Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor, he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord." He then went on to say, "This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears." (Luke 4:17, ff)

        Please note that all these points of identification are literal and actual marks on Christ Himself; all taken from prophecy! And again, our Lord said nothing about His pedigree. The actual and literal marks and signs of identification were on Himself; and the recital of His pedigree would not have been half so convincing.

        Now let us ask, shall we not be justified in applying the same method of interpretation to all the prophecies concerning Israel that Christ used concerning Himself, and in looking for Israel, seek for her and recognize her by her marks, rather than by her pedigree? The marks are absolutely vital.

        Of all the people who came to our Lord Jesus Christ, and saw, and heard, and believed, we do not read of a single one who asked to see and examine His pedigree before accepting Him. Nor do we read of anyone to whom Christ showed it. Two of John the Baptist's disciples when they came in contact with Jesus said unto Him, "Rabbi, where dwellest thou?" (John 1:38) And He said, "Come and see." And they abode with Him that day. The next day one of them, Andrew, went and found Simon, his brother, and saith unto him, "We have found the Messiah."

        Notice, the day before He was to Andrew only a "rabbi." But having dwelt with Christ one day, He became the Messiah! How was that? Did Andrew spend the interval in studying the Lord's genealogy? Not he. He had spent it with the Lord Himself. He had seen the marks and signs first-hand; that was why he went with such confidence to his brother, Peter.

        Take the case of Nathaniel, a pronounced and confessed unbeliever. Phillip, having found the Lord, went immediately and found Nathaniel and said, "We have found Jesus." But listen to the stinging sneer of unbelief that came from Nathaniel, "Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?" Phillip answered, "Cone and see." Come and see what? His line and pedigree? Oh no, but Him.

        Christ saw Nathaniel coming and He only uttered two sentences to him, all Nathaniel's doubt and unbelief had gone, and there burst out from his full heart this spontaneous exclamation: "Rabbi, Thou are the Son of God; Thou art the King of Israel." (John 1:45-49)

        So far as we know, Nathaniel had never seen the Lord before, and even now had only been in His presence in a moment or two; and yet, there had come upon him like a lightning flash this overwhelming conviction. How was it? Had he been examining the Lord's genealogy? No, he hadn't had time. He had only that moment seen Him. He was convinced without the production of the genealogy. How then was the great change wrought? He had seen the marks of the Messiah: nay, one mark only; but that was enough for Nathaniel. He knew most assuredly that the genealogy would be right if the marks were right. Is there anything for us there?

        Again, take the case of the woman at the well; Jesus declared Himself to her as the Messiah. But when the woman, quite forgetting here water-pot, ran into the city proclaiming her discovery, she said nothing about His pedigree, but she began publishing the signs, the marks of the Messiah. "Come, see a man which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?" And when the men came, "They said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world." (John 4:29, 42)

        The men had seen the indisputable signs and marks themselves, and they were the certainties that proclaimed the Messiah.

        Upon one occasion the Jews took up stones to stone the Lord; then Christ immediately pointed out to them the signs and marks which were upon Him, as justifying His extraordinary claims. And again, He mentioned nothing of His line or pedigree; but said, "If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works." (John 10:37-38) Thus pointing them point blank to His works, His marks.
 

Marks of Israel - Part 3

        Christ Our Lord and His Marks!: We have excellent authority for claiming that Israel must be known and recognized by the marks that are upon her, rather than by the revealing of her lost pedigree.

        Christ did not, in His own case, appeal to the test of pedigree. Let us see how this was so. When John the Baptist was in prison, he desired to know if this marvelous person that was going about was the Messiah. So he sent his disciples to the Lord to inquire who He was; and they cam, asking: "Art thou He that should come, or do we look for another."

        Now here was an excellent opportunity for Christ to declare His lineage and pedigree. He might have said, "God tell John that I am of the tribe of Judah and of the house of David."

        But He did not do anything of the kind, He gave John more definite things on which to build his faith. John was familiar with the prophets, and knew well the marks of the Messiah. And so Christ bade them go and tell John the marks which they saw in Himself; the actual and literal marks as foretold of the Messiah: "Go and shew John those things which ye do hear and see: the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the gospel preached to them." (Matthew 11:5; Luke 7:3)

        These were the signs and proofs of the Messiah more than a recital of His pedigree. The marks, the prophetic marks were upon Him: they defined and declared the Messiah!

        Tried by this standard (and it must be a true one, for Christ used it), we are perfectly justified in saying that if we, the Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, Celtic people, have the actual and literal marks, the prophetic marks of Israel; especially if no other nation has them, then surely we must be that very Israel. And if the tracing of the pedigree is necessary, then God, in His own good time, will make that plain.

        In the meantime, the great question is "Have we the marks? And all the marks?" and, "Are they on us only?" If so, then the tracing of the pedigree can safely be left.

        Take another instance. Our blessed Lord upon one occasion visited His own city Nazareth; and entering into the synagogue He stood up to read, and the Book says: "And there was delivered unto him the book of the prophet Esaias...he found the place where it was written, the Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor, he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised, to preach the acceptable year of the Lord." He then went on to say, "This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears." (Luke 4:17, ff)

        Please note that all these points of identification are literal and actual marks on Christ Himself; all taken from prophecy! And again, our Lord said nothing about His pedigree. The actual and literal marks and signs of identification were on Himself; and the recital of His pedigree would not have been half so convincing.

        Now let us ask, shall we not be justified in applying the same method of interpretation to all the prophecies concerning Israel that Christ used concerning Himself, and in looking for Israel, seek for her and recognize her by her marks, rather than by her pedigree? The marks are absolutely vital.

        Of all the people who came to our Lord Jesus Christ, and saw, and heard, and believed, we do not read of a single one who asked to see and examine His pedigree before accepting Him. Nor do we read of anyone to whom Christ showed it. Two of John the Baptist's disciples when they came in contact with Jesus said unto Him, "Rabbi, where dwellest thou?" (John 1:38) And He said, "Come and see." And they abode with Him that day. The next day one of them, Andrew, went and found Simon, his brother, and saith unto him, "We have found the Messiah."

        Notice, the day before He was to Andrew only a "rabbi." But having dwelt with Christ one day, He became the Messiah! How was that? Did Andrew spend the interval in studying the Lord's genealogy? Not he. He had spent it with the Lord Himself. He had seen the marks and signs first-hand; that was why he went with such confidence to his brother, Peter.

        Take the case of Nathaniel, a pronounced and confessed unbeliever. Phillip, having found the Lord, went immediately and found Nathaniel and said, "We have found Jesus." But listen to the stinging sneer of unbelief that came from Nathaniel, "Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth?" Phillip answered, "Cone and see." Come and see what? His line and pedigree? Oh no, but Him.

        Christ saw Nathaniel coming and He only uttered two sentences to him, all Nathaniel's doubt and unbelief had gone, and there burst out from his full heart this spontaneous exclamation: "Rabbi, Thou are the Son of God; Thou art the King of Israel." (John 1:45-49)

        So far as we know, Nathaniel had never seen the Lord before, and even now had only been in His presence in a moment or two; and yet, there had come upon him like a lightning flash this overwhelming conviction. How was it? Had he been examining the Lord's genealogy? No, he hadn't had time. He had only that moment seen Him. He was convinced without the production of the genealogy. How then was the great change wrought? He had seen the marks of the Messiah: nay, one mark only; but that was enough for Nathaniel. He knew most assuredly that the genealogy would be right if the marks were right. Is there anything for us there?

        Again, take the case of the woman at the well; Jesus declared Himself to her as the Messiah. But when the woman, quite forgetting here water-pot, ran into the city proclaiming her discovery, she said nothing about His pedigree, but she began publishing the signs, the marks of the Messiah. "Come, see a man which told me all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?" And when the men came, "They said unto the woman, Now we believe, not because of thy saying: for we have heard him ourselves, and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the world." (John 4:29, 42)

        The men had seen the indisputable signs and marks themselves, and they were the certainties that proclaimed the Messiah.

        Upon one occasion the Jews took up stones to stone the Lord; then Christ immediately pointed out to them the signs and marks which were upon Him, as justifying His extraordinary claims. And again, He mentioned nothing of His line or pedigree; but said, "If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works." (John 10:37-38) Thus pointing them point blank to His works, His marks.

        One more reference: "And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: but these are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God: and that believing ye might have life through his name." (John 20:30-31)

        What are those that are written? Genealogies, pedigrees? Oh no. John did not mention them. Matthew did; Luke did, but not John. John had something much more certain upon which to build up the faith of the ages. He wrote about the Master Himself, the works He did, the marvelous words He said, the marks that were upon Him, the signs indubitable.

        From the very first verse of that wonderful first chapter of John: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God;" right down to the very last verse of the Gospel, it is packed full of evidences, signs, marks, seen in the words, deeds, character, life and death of Jesus, and these are the things on which he bids us ground our faith, and so believing "have life through His name."

        In other words, the faith of all succeeding generations is to be based on the marks or signs of the Messiah. That is a most remarkable statement of the Apostle. So then, likewise in looking for Israel we must find the people who have got the marks of Israel. The pedigree will be all right if the marks are. God will see to that.

        Let it be here particularly noticed that in not one single Old Testament prophecy concerning Christ Jesus our Lord was His human name given.

        Isaiah 7:14, calls Him "Immanuel," and 9:6, calls Him "Wonderful," "Counselor," "The Mighty God," but none of these was His human name. The pronoun "He" is used; and not always that. "He was despised:" "He hath borne our griefs."

 

Marks of Israel - Part 4

        The very first time his human name is given is in Matthew 1:21: "Thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall save his people from their sins."

        There is no need to assume the name in the Israel prophecies. The name is given in full. "Israel," "The House of Israel," "Ephraim," "MY People," "My Nation," "My people Israel."

        Here are six forms by which their remarkable prophecies are addressed, and there are others. Indeed so clear are they that they have proven a great embarrassment to our theologians who have, as a consequence seized hold of them and claimed them for the church, an utterly unwarrantable proceeding.

        If the church is justified in applying those unnamed Messianic prophecies to our Lord (and most certainly they refer to Him), then what about those other prophecies to Israel which are fully named and addressed?

        What are the great prophetic marks by which Isaiah points out the Messiah? Here are some of them, and notice how literal they all are: Acquainted with grief ...stricken, smitten of God; afflicted... wounded for our transgressions; bruised for our iniquities...He was oppressed, and He was afflicted, yet He opened not His mouth...brought as a lamb to the slaughter...taken from prison and from judgment...cut off out of the land of the living...made His grave with the wicked and with the rich in His death...numbered with the transgressors...bare the sins of many...made intercession for the transgressors." (Isaiah 53).

        Who is the "He" spoken of in all these passages? The prophet does not tell us. Nor does he give us the faintest clue whatever, except the marks of the Man, when in due time He should appear.

        The Ethiopian Eunuch was quite justified in saying to Philip, "I pray thee of whom speakest the prophet this? Of himself, or of some other man?" (Acts 8:34) Yet we know that all these passages referred to Israel's Redeemer, the Saviour. But, till the Great Subject of the prophecy, the Man of Sorrows, came, the prophecy was in a cloud, and was very uncertain in its application.

        But when He, the Saviour, appeared with all His marks upon Him, what then? His marks declared Him. The shepherds on Bethlehem's hills were instructed to find Him, but how? BY THE MARKS! "Unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord. And this shall be a SIGN unto you: Ye shall find the Babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger." (Luke 2:11-12)

        Two marks only: 1). "A babe wrapped in swaddling clothes," 2). "Lying in a manger." And that was the only babe in all Bethlehem that night who had those two marks. For God would take good care that none but His own Son would have His Son's marks.

        How may we know this with absolute certainty? Because if any other child had possessed the marks the clues would have been useless. Nor did our blessed Lord leave all those marks behind Him in the tomb. Even after the resurrection, He still had the marks. The prophecy reads: "They pierced my hands and my feet." (Psalm 22:16) Now read the fulfillment: "And when he had thus spoken, he showed them his hands and his feet." (Luke 24:40)

        The doubter Thomas knew what was the true test of identity: "Except I shall see in his hands the print of the nails, and put my finger into the print of the nails, and thrust my hand into his side, I will not believe."(John 20:25)

        He had his doubts forever silenced when he saw the marks: "Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing." And Thomas, unbelieving Thomas, at the sight of the marks, cried out, "My Lord, and my God." (John 20:27-28)

        But what if Thomas, had repudiated the Lord after he had seen the marks? His name would have come down to us loaded with the execrations of all the generations. Thousands of Christians today believe that our Saviour took those precious marks with Him to heaven.

        One of our poets pictures even the angels transfixed with joy, and overcome with emotion at the sight of the marks: "Him they beheld their conquering God; Returned with garments rolled in blood, They saw, and kindled at the sight; And filled with joy the realms of light; Their highest Hallelujah's met, They fell and kissed His bleeding feet."

        Marks even for angels. Even today, do not Christians of all grades and denominations sing: "Hath He marks to lead me to Him, If He be my guide?" And the same verse there comes the answer, "In His feet and hands are wound-prints, And His side."

        Marks? Yes! Precious marks indeed. Marks for the doubters, like Thomas; marks for the faltering, like Peter; Marks for the devoted, like Mary Magdalene; Marks of suffering; marks of conflict; marks of tears; marks of agony; but also glorious marks of victory. And all a thousand times more precious to believers even than the crown He wears.

        Marks in the manger; marks on the cross; marks in the tomb; marks as He ascended; and even marks in Heaven; for the Apostle John in the glimpse of that glorious place which was afforded him, says: "And I beheld, and, lo, in the midst of the throne...stood a Lamb as it had been slain."

        And the new song which John heard sung was: "Thou art worthy to take the book, and to open the seals thereof: for thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by thy blood out of every kindred, and tongue, and people, and nation." (Revelation 5:9)

        All our poets agree. One sings: "Five bleeding wounds He bears Received on Calvary."

        Another sings: "There for me the Saviour stands, Shows His wounds, and spreads His hands."

        While another, in one of the most powerful and majestic hymns of all time, in describing Christ as He comes in glory with His Saints, triumphantly sings: "The dear tokens of His passion, Still His dazzling body bears; Cause of endless exultation, To His ransomed worshipers; With what rapture, Gaze we on those glorious scars."

        Marks for identification; marks for praise; marks for worship. Blessed, glorious marks of our Lord.

        ISRAEL and HIS MARKS: Now we leave our Lord and His marks, and come back to Israel. Let us apply the same method for the discovery of God's son Israel that was applied to discover the Messiah.

        If God would be careful not to put on any other but His Son, the Messiah, His marks, surely He would do the same to His people whom He calls His son, His Firstborn. If so, there is not a single nation on earth today that has Israel's marks but Israel herself. God would see to that. Thus if we can discover the nation and people with Israel's marks, we have discovered Israel.

        When the sheep farmer having clipped his sheep in the spring desires to secure them as his own he puts upon them his private mark (brand) before he allows them to go upon the common or the hillside. What far? That they may be known and identified as his.

        Therefore, when His people Israel were sent; for their sins, among the outside heathen nations, God put upon them His private mark; but not merely one; not even ten; nor twenty; but many more, now amounting to over seventy marks; and for these reasons: 1). That Israel herself in the time to come; though she should lose all trace of her way, lose here name, lose her records, lose her religion, lose her language yet should know herself definitely and certainly; and 2). That the nations should also know her when her time for acknowledgment had fully come; and that when God puts His hand on Israel and says (as He will do): "Thou art my people," and they, in answer shall say, "Thou art my God" the nations shall know that this is the very same identical Israel that God sent forth out of Canaan for their iniquities, and which, to the glory of His name, He is then restoring. "For, lo, I will...sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth." (Amos 9:9)

        There is the distributing. Now for the collecting. "For this saith the Lord God; Behold, I, even I, will both search my sheep and seek them out...so will I seek out my sheep, and will deliver them out of all places where they have been scattered in the cloudy and dark day...Thus shall they know that I the Lord their God am with them, and that they, even the house of Israel, are my people, saith the Lord God." (Ezekiel 34:11-12, 30)

Marks of Israel - Part 5

        So, just as the sheep farmer on the hillside marks his sheep, God marks His Israel people, and so will God preserve, keep, seek out, and finally put His hand on Israel, whom He calls His sheep, and who have placed upon them His distinctive marks.

        There are some men, however, who should know better, who regard these God-given marks as of no value. They much prefer the uncertain records and traditions of men, being utterly oblivious of this fact, that if these God-marks are not there, all else is folly.

        God, in His final choice as to which people are His people Israel, will not be guided by the traditions, genealogies and records of men. Please set that down. He knows where Israel is, for not a grain is to fall to the earth; and God will own that people as His people Israel, ON WHOM HE HAS PUT HIS OWN MARKS.

        Christ our Lord made His great appeal not to the test of the line or pedigree, though that was all right; but to the signs or marks. We make our great appeal not to the test or the records of the genealogical line, they are lost; nay, God has purposely cut them off. "Therefore, behold, I will hedge up thy way with thorns, and make a wall, that she shall not find her paths." (Hosea 2:6) Ferrar Fenton says, "So that she shall not find her beaten paths," evidently the path behind her.

        There you have Israel's way marks entirely obliterated; so that it is absolutely useless to seek to establish definite claims to the identity that way. It cannot be done. God has cut off the way marks. If it were possible to establish the way marks, and find the line, what have you done? Only discovered the line, that is all. And that is not enough. Remember that terrible passage of Paul, "They are not all Israel, which are of Israel." (Romans 9:6) Of the line, indeed; but not the true heir. The heirship must be established, and that can only be discovered by the marks?

        Romans 9:6-8: "But (it is) not as though the word of God hath come to nought. For they are not all Israel, that are of Israel: neither, because they are Abraham's seed, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, it is not the children of the flesh that are children of God; but the children of the promise are reckoned for a seed." (ASV)

        Many Judeo-Christian teachers, ministers, and etc., use this verse to show that ALL the various races can come under the Abrahamic Covenant; but this is not so. The verses clearly state "For they are not all Israel, that are of Israel: neither, because they are Abraham's seed, are they all children." Ishmael was the seed of Abraham, and could be classified as part of Israel, but the Scriptures clearly shows that ONLY IN ISAAC WOULD THE SEED OF ABRAHAM BE CALLED. For the children of the flesh Ishmael, and the sons of Ketrah could be called of Israel, but could not be called after Isaac.

        The so-called Judeo-Christian scholars are looking for Israel being found in some people who have preserved their records and know their descent; but the True Israel will never be found that way. For the people that the scholars are looking at a people who hate Abraham, Isaac, Jacob/Israel and the Lord Jesus Christ.

        She was to lose her way marks, not find her paths; and God says that He Himself has done it. "I will hedge her about with thorns, and make a wall." (Hosea 2:6) Cut her off, separate her, detach her from all her previous history: for it is recorded: "She shall not find her paths."

        So the method of the scholars in seeking to find Israel by her records, her way marks, or her paths, is altogether useless. God says it cannot be done. They are broken, cut off, destroyed, obliterated by His express commands.

        How then will she be found, for most assuredly she is to be. There is only one way. But perhaps someone says: "If this is so, why not wait till God speaks?"

        This is a very pertinent inquiry, but one which fails to take into account one vital passage of Scripture: "I will yet for this be enquired of by the house of Israel, to do it for them." (Ezekiel 36:37) And Ferrar Fenton translates it in the imperative, "must." This indicates earnest national inquiry, i.e., prayer to God, for Him to do these great things for Israel. But how can Israel inquire till Israel knows?

        Before the earnest inquiry, there must come the knowledge of who we are. And that knowledge can never come with absolute certainty by mere human records. It must be founded on the God-given marks. They alone give certainty.

        Therefore, even though God will speak and acknowledge us, as He assures us most definitely in His word (Hosea 1:10; 2:23; Ezekiel 39:22, 28-29), yet it is our place first to know, and then to inquire of Him as He has decreed.

        THE LOST CHILD and HIS MARKS: Even today, in the most vital things, as well as in the common things of life, we go by marks. Take a suppositious case from domestic life, but one like a number that really have occurred. A mother has the misfortune to lose here baby, a boy two years old, by his being kidnaped. The police are at once on the track of the child, but despite all their efforts and inquiries they fail to find him: and all but the mother give up hope of him ever being found.

        Many years afterwards, she receives a letter from a lawyer in Spain saying that an old gypsy woman had just died; and to relieve her conscience before death had confessed that a young man who had passed as her son was not her son at all, but was kidnaped; and from the country and neighborhood in which the lady lived. He then inquired, "Did the lady tink he could be her long- lost son; if so, would she give any marks by which he could be identified?"

        What was the mother to do? At once she wires:

        1). "Birthmark the size of a cherry back of the neck.
        2). Double birthmark one inch long, middle of the back.
        3). Scar, outside of left leg, above the ankle, one inch long.
        4). Scar, over the right ear, half inch in length."

        Immediately she gets a wire saying that all the marks are found, she and her husband leave for Spain at once but to her intense disappointment when she gets there she finds a dark swarthy man, with gypsy manners, gypsy language; and without any resemblance to herself or to her husband.

        Concealing as best she can her first disappointment she asks him to show her the scar over the right ear, and when she sees their listlessness quickly changes to hope. Then she asks him to turn down his sock that she may see the scar she knows so well above the left ankle; lo and behold, there it is.

        Then with agitated manner, and in great excitement she rushes to his neck and herself turns down his collar to see the birthmark she knows so well; and when she sees it, exactly where she knew it should be, she can scarcely contain herself any longer. Then she makes this great swarthy fellow strip himself, and the mother, eager beyond all words, looks for the double birthmark, the last. And sure enough it is there. Without any more ado, she flings her arms around him and claims him as her long-lost son. And every mother would say she was right.

        On the strength of those four marks only, they take this utter stranger home and install him there as the heir of all their property, their long-lost son. But he could not remember his father, nor his mother, nor his old home, nor his father's language, nor his father's religion, nor the way he had come. That did not matter; for he had the marks.

        The way he had trod, the adventures he had seen, the weary tramps and marching all may come out bit by bit as his dazed mind might recall them; but their value as evidence is discounted. The marks are there, and everything else is subordinate and unimportant.

        Now we are in the exact position of the long-lost son, with rights and privileges, and a great inheritance wholly belonging to us, though as yet undiscovered; for we have the Israel-marks and they are all birthmarks. Not four marks only; not merely fourteen; not merely forty-four, but OVER SEVENTY DISTINCT MARKS. Now you may forge a name, but you cannot forge birthmarks. Israel may lose her records, but Israel cannot lose the God-marks.

        If we could trace the line of any people with absolute certainty back to Old Israel, and then if that people did not have upon them the God-marks of Israel, all would be in vain. As a matter of fact we are in the exact position of the long-lost child, with an immense but undiscovered interest in his father's will: with property and blessings and rights innumerable, and all indubitably ours through the mercy and favor of God; but our connection with our long-lost line and possessions has been denied to us by theologians who have calmly allotted most of these to a false claimant.

        It is quite obvious, however, that God has a voice in these matters; and that neither man's foolishness, nor man's misunderstanding, nor Israel's ignorance of his line, nor even Israel's sin (please do emphasize that) is going to turn everlasting goodness from His age-long purpose to do Israel good and not evil. Listen to this profound and insuring declaration of the Lord God Almighty: "And I will give them one heart, and one way, that they may fear me (how long) for ever, for the good of them, and of their children after them. And I will make an everlasting covenant with them, that I will not turn away from them, to do them good...Yea, I will rejoice over them to do them good, and I will plant them in this land assuredly with my whole heart, and with my whole soul. For this saith the Lord: Like as I have brought all this great evil upon this people, so will I bring upon them all the good that I have promised them." (Jeremiah 32:39, 42)

        The good is as certain as the evil, and to the same people. Let it be said again, and with all the force and emphasis that it is possible to convey, that the marks are the one absolute and final test of identity.

        The great question is not, "Can we trace Israel's line," but "Have we Israel's marks? And all of them?" For if we could trace our line perfectly, if we could fix absolutely our actual and literal descent from the Israelites, it would be of no avail if we had not the marks; because only the people with God's marks can be His chosen people.

        So then, that people upon whom God has put the marks must possess them because God knows they are His Israel. In other words, the people who possess the marks, by that very token show God's definite choice, His settlement of the questions of lineage, and so of the inheritance.

        We may never know, actually know, the whole details of the literal line as it has come down; however, that does not matter so long as He knows. And if He has put His marks upon us, and all the marks, we can safely leave the tracing of the line till in His own good time God shall say to them who were cast off (and supposed not to be His people, but who now in these latter days are rediscovered bearing all the marks of the long-lost son): "Thou art my people, and they shall say, Thou art my God." (Hosea 2:23)
 
 

Marks of Israel - Part 6

        Now let's examine the specific "Marks," "Fingerprints," or "Footprints" which will prove conclusively that the United States is: REGATHERED ISRAEL! That the so-called Christian Nations of the Western World are also comprised of the descendants of the ancient Israelites.

        1). The land of the promised nation was to be located between two seas the Eastern Sea and the Great Western Sea!

        Ezekiel 47:18; Amos 8:1-12; Joel 2:20); Ezekiel 48:1; Psalm 72:8; Zechariah 9:10; Zechariah 14:8; Ezekiel 47:19.

        Our so-called "Ministers" and "Learned Theologians" have, for the most part, generally supposed that the present day State of Israel, is the country referred to, but let them show these EASTERN, SOUTHERN and WESTERN SEAS for boundaries. This defect alone is fatal, and INVALIDATES THE CLAIMS OF THE JEWS and today's religious claims for the present day State of Israel.

        2). This land is described as being uncultivated and unimproved.

Deuteronomy 32:8-11; Job 29:3; Job 38:26-27; Isaiah 49:7-8; Isaiah 51:3; Isaiah 58:12; Isaiah 62:4; 1 Chronicles 17:9; Jeremiah 32:43; Baruch 2:35; Baruch 3:24-36; Jeremiah 33:12-14; Ezekiel 36:35; Ezekiel 38:8.

        Neither ancient Palestine nor the present day State of Israel is referred to here, for it cannot be said, in truth, that Palestine has always been waste. For it was known as Canaan Land long before Israel conquered it. (Exodus 6:4) Then after they were taken into Assyrian Captivity, the king of Assyria brought other people in to replace them after they were taken away captive. (2 Kings 17:24)

        However, our own country, the United States, fully answers the description of each and every one of the Scriptures. The Great Plains of the Middle west, of West Texas and Eastern New Mexico; the Eastern, Western and Southern forest presented to our ancestors, the same unbroken wilderness they had remained throughout the ages: For God had preserved them for their future destiny, as the final resting place for the Children of Israel in Zion and New Jerusalem. (Isaiah 49:8)

        3). The land of regathered Israel to have vast forests of trees.

        Isaiah 60:13; Ezekiel 37:28; Joel 2:27; Isaiah 24:15; Isaiah 24:15; 2 Esdras 13:2-13; Isaiah 61:9; Isaiah 41:18-19; (A Discourse delivered at Plymouth on the 22nd of December, 1820 by Daniel Webster, Vol. 1, The Works of Daniel Webster -- 1851); 1 Chronicles 17:9; 2 Samuel 7:10; Isaiah 14:1; Jeremiah 31:1-10; Isaiah 41:20; Isaiah 43:1-2; 2 Esdras 13:41; Isaiah 35:1-7.

        ALL OF PALESTINE COULD FIT ON THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA, NOW A MATURE FOREST OF FIR TREES ALREADY OVER 2000 YEARS OLD, AND PROTECTED WITH 13 1/4 FEET OF ANNUAL RAINFALL!

        4). Israel was to be a great and mighty nation.

        Genesis 12:2; Genesis 18:18; Deuteronomy 4:7-8; Deuteronomy 26:5; Deuteronomy 4:38: Deuteronomy 7:1; Deuteronomy 9:1; Deuteronomy 11:23.

        Here are just a few verses among many which testify as to the fact, there were MANY nations MIGHTIER and GREATER than Israel.

        Nor can it be said that ALL the nations of the earth were blessed in Ancient Israel. Oh yes, many of the "Ministers" of America will point to Christ and exclaim that ALL the nations were blessed in Him. But if one will be completely honest -- NOT ALL THE NATIONS ON EARTH HAVE BEEN BLESSED IN HIM AS OF YET! This is because not all the nations have accepted Him, nor have realized the truth of His sacrifice and the importance of His dying on the Stake, being buried, then Raised again, Ascending into Heaven and is now sitting at the Right Hand of Almighty God. However, the United States of America, the foremost nation of the western hemisphere in the number and wealth of its people, and the second largest in Area. Has blessed ALL the nations of the earth in one way or another.

        This "Great Nation" in which the eastern coast is separated from Europe by approximately 3,000 miles of the Atlantic Ocean which acts as a carrier for an enormous commerce between the two continents, but which, at the same time, gives the United States a degree of isolation from European affairs which contributed greatly to its independent growth and progress. While the Pacific Ocean which separates the United States from the Oriental nations of the far east is wider, varying from 5,000-6,000 miles, but in the acquisition of the Hawaiian Islands the United States acquired possession of an important midway stepping stone to these far away nations.

        Also, the United States consists of 50 separate and theoretically sovereign states [nations] which are joined together by [one] federal government to which the original 13 states [nations] delegated CERTAIN powers to it, and which are outlined in the Federal Constitution adopted in 1787 and placed in force in 1789. By the Declaration of Independence in 1776, the Thirteen American Colonies of Great Britain expressed their action as that of "these united colonies," but the terms of the declaration implied that each became an independent state or nation.

        The thirteen united in declaring independence and in the conduct of war, though their co-operation was largely ineffective. The Articles of Confederation, adopted in 1781, constituted a legal symbol of union, but the Central Government under these articles had no coercive power over the states, and no power whatever over the citizens of the states.

        However, since the United States is regathered Israel, Zion and New Jerusalem where God was forming the Kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ here on the earth as promised in the scriptures. Therefore, unknown to our forefathers He caused them to become discontent with the original Articles of Confederation, and so the National Constitution was framed in 1787 and placed into effect in 1789, to remedy this situation by creating a Central Government [Which ultimately, upon Christ's return will be turned into a Kingdom with Christ as King] with large powers and with the authority to exercise these powers, not only upon the states, but directly upon all citizens of the country.

        When the first Congress of the United States under the Constitution of 1787 assembled in New York in April 1789, the Union had a membership of eleven states. North Carolina and Rhode Island soon joined their sisters of the original thirteen states [nations]. The thirteen have now grown to fifty. Everybody in the United States except the American Indian is an immigrant from some other country or a descendant of an immigrant. The main race groups are:

        1). The descendants of the colonist, who were mainly Anglo-Saxons, with some Germans and Scotch-Irish;

        2). Descendants of the European who came over in GREAT NUMBERS;

        3). The large number of recent immigrants and their children, which unfortunately are the Jews and Asians who are enemies of Christ and Christians; and are alien to our Christian Heritage.

        No human agent can possibly list all of the blessings Americans [Israelites] have given to the people of the world;

        1). In agriculture: Dams, advancement in crop production, development
of arid lands;

        2). Electronics: Telephones, motion pictures, telegraph, electric
transformer, radio and television;

        3). Medicine: Anesthetic, vaccines, vitamins and surgical procedures;

        4). Christianity: The U.S. has sent more Missionaries around the world spreading the Word of God, the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ and has translated the Bible into almost every language on earth;

        5). avionics: Air Plane, missiles and space craft;

        6). So many other ways it would take volumes to relate.

        How many great nations are there in the world? Not more than about eight if all of the Anglo-Saxon race and stock are counted as one. 1). The United States and Great Britain and all her offshoots; 2) France; 3). Germany; 4). Italy; 5). Japan; 6). Russia; 7). China and 8). Turkey. Those great peoples of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, being chiefly of British descent, are included in 1).

        Now if Israel was to be a great and mighty nation she is somewhere among these eight nations. But objectors may say that this promise was fulfilled in the time of David and Solomon. That is very ingenious, but it will not do. For how could that be, seeing that immediately after Solomon's death the nation was violently split into two parts, and in a few years was broken up, carried captive, scattered, lost? Is that God's way of fulfilling His Word? Surely not! Conquered, carried captive, her land possessed by the heathen, is that the great nation promised unconditionally to Abraham? Impossible.

        5). Israel's seed to be without number.

        Genesis 13:16; Genesis 15:5; Genesis 22:17; Genesis 24:60; Genesis 26:4-24; Genesis 28:3-14; Genesis 32:12; Genesis 49:22; Isaiah 10:22; Hosea
1:10.

        In 1785, there were approximately 350,000 people in Palestine, in what is known today as the State of Israel. "After 4 centuries of Ottoman rule, during which the population declined to a low of 350,000 [1785]." (The World Almanac and Book of Fact, 1984, p. 509 published for the Dallas Morning News)

        Then in 1982, the population was estimated to be only 4,100,000 (World Almanac). This is an increase of only 3,750,000 in a period of some 197 years. While at the same time, and during a less number of years, there were 70,000,000 Europeans who immigrated to the United States in just 114 years. "Some 70 million Europeans emigrated in the century before 1914." (The World Almanac and Book of Fact, 1984, p. 685)

        6). Regathered Israel was to be a nation established and inhabited by people gathered out of many nations.

        Nehemiah 1:9; Psalms 107:3; Isaiah 11:12; 2 Esdras 13:40-46; "Behold, these shall come from far: and, lo, these from the north and from the west; and these FROM THE LAND OF SINIM [This was the ancient name of China]." (Isaiah 49:12)

        Isaiah 60:4; Jeremiah 3:16-19; Baruch 4:37; Jeremiah 29:14; Ezekiel 11:17; Ezekiel 20:34; Ezekiel 34:13; Ezekiel 36:24; Ezekiel 37:21-22; Ezekiel 38:8; Hosea 1:11; Micah 4:6-7; Isaiah 49:18; Isaiah 60:4-8; Isaiah 60:5-13; Isaiah 2:6-8; Isaiah 33:20-21; (Isaiah 60:11; Jeremiah 30:10; Ezekiel 34:28; Ezekiel 38:12; Zechariah 2:4; 2 Esdras 1:13; Isaiah 60:10; Isaiah 61:5; Isaiah 60:14;
 
 

Click Here if you would like a hard copy of any of Willie Martin's books

Jew Watch - Willie Martin